Skip to main content
Log in

Prognostic Significance and Molecular Features of Signet-Ring Cell and Mucinous Components in Colorectal Carcinoma

  • Colorectal Cancer
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Colorectal carcinoma (CRC) represents a group of histopathologically and molecularly heterogeneous diseases, which may contain signet-ring cell component and/or mucinous component to a varying extent under pathology assessment. However, little is known about the prognostic significance of those components, independent of various tumor molecular features.

Methods

Utilizing a molecular pathological epidemiology database of 1,336 rectal and colon cancers in the Nurses’ Health Study and the Health Professionals Follow-up Study, we examined patient survival according to the proportion of signet-ring cell and mucinous components in CRCs. Cox proportional hazards models were used to compute hazard ratio (HR) for mortality, adjusting for potential confounders including stage, microsatellite instability, CpG island methylator phenotype, LINE-1 methylation, and KRAS, BRAF, and PIK3CA mutations.

Results

Compared to CRC without signet-ring cell component, 1–50 % signet-ring cell component was associated with multivariate CRC-specific mortality HR of 1.40 [95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.02–1.93], and >50 % signet-ring cell component was associated with multivariate CRC-specific mortality HR of 4.53 (95 % CI 2.53–8.12) (P trend < 0.0001). Compared to CRC without mucinous component, neither 1–50 % mucinous component (multivariate HR 1.04; 95 % CI 0.81–1.33) nor >50 % mucinous component (multivariate HR 0.82; 95 % CI 0.54–1.23) was significantly associated with CRC-specific mortality (P trend < 0.57).

Conclusions

Even a minor (50 % or less) signet-ring cell component in CRC was associated with higher patient mortality, independent of various tumor molecular and other clinicopathological features. In contrast, mucinous component was not associated with mortality in CRC patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bosman FT, Carneiro F, Hruban RH, Theise ND. WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system. 4th edition. Geneva: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kang H, O’Connell JB, Maggard MA, Sack J, Ko CY. A 10-year outcomes evaluation of mucinous and signet-ring cell carcinoma of the colon and rectum. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;48:1161–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Chew MH, Yeo SA, Ng ZP, Lim KH, Koh PK, Ng KH, Eu KW. Critical analysis of mucin and signet ring cell as prognostic factors in an Asian population of 2,764 sporadic colorectal cancers. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2010;25:1221–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Shin US, Yu CS, Kim JH, et al. Mucinous rectal cancer: effectiveness of preoperative chemoradiotherapy and prognosis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:2232–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hyngstrom JR, Hu CY, Xing Y, et al. Clinicopathology and outcomes for mucinous and signet ring colorectal adenocarcinoma: analysis from the National Cancer Data Base. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:2814–21.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Nitsche U, Zimmermann A, Spath C, et al. Mucinous and signet-ring cell colorectal cancers differ from classical adenocarcinomas in tumor biology and prognosis. Ann Surg. 2013;258:775–83.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Xie L, Villeneuve PJ, Shaw A. Survival of patients diagnosed with either colorectal mucinous or non-mucinous adenocarcinoma: a population-based study in Canada. Int J Oncol. 2009;34:1109–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gopalan V, Smith RA, Ho YH, Lam AK. Signet-ring cell carcinoma of colorectum—current perspectives and molecular biology. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2011;26:127–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Verhulst J, Ferdinande L, Demetter P, Ceelen W. Mucinous subtype as prognostic factor in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Pathol. 2012;65:381–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Yamaguchi T, Taniguchi H, Fujita S, et al. Clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic factors of advanced colorectal mucinous adenocarcinoma. Histopathology. 2012;61:162–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hugen N, van de Velde CJ, de Wilt JH, Nagtegaal ID. Metastatic pattern in colorectal cancer is strongly influenced by histological subtype. Ann Oncol. 2014;25:651–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ogino S, Brahmandam M, Cantor M, et al. Distinct molecular features of colorectal carcinoma with signet ring cell component and colorectal carcinoma with mucinous component. Mod Pathol. 2006;19:59–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Tanaka H, Deng G, Matsuzaki K, et al. BRAF mutation, CpG island methylator phenotype and microsatellite instability occur more frequently and concordantly in mucinous than non-mucinous colorectal cancer. Int J Cancer. 2006;118:2765–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kakar S, Deng G, Smyrk TC, Cun L, Sahai V, Kim YS. Loss of heterozygosity, aberrant methylation, BRAF mutation and KRAS mutation in colorectal signet ring cell carcinoma. Mod Pathol. 2012;25:1040–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kelemen LE, Kobel M. Mucinous carcinomas of the ovary and colorectum: different organ, same dilemma. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12:1071–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Baba Y, Huttenhower C, Nosho K, et al. Epigenomic diversity of colorectal cancer indicated by LINE-1 methylation in a database of 869 tumors. Mol Cancer. 2010;9:125.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Samowitz WS, Sweeney C, Herrick J, et al. Poor survival associated with the BRAF V600E mutation in microsatellite-stable colon cancers. Cancer Res. 2005;65:6063–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ogino S, Nosho K, Kirkner GJ, et al. A cohort study of tumoral LINE-1 hypomethylation and prognosis in colon cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008;100:1734–8.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ogino S, Nosho K, Kirkner GJ, et al. CpG island methylator phenotype, microsatellite instability, BRAF mutation and clinical outcome in colon cancer. Gut. 2009;58:90–6.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Colussi D, Brandi G, Bazzoli F, Ricciardiello L. Molecular pathways involved in colorectal cancer: implications for disease behavior and prevention. Int J Mol Sci. 2013;14:16365–85.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Bardhan K, Liu K. Epigenetics and colorectal cancer pathogenesis. Cancers. 2013;5:676–713.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Zoratto F, Rossi L, Verrico M, et al. Focus on genetic and epigenetic events of colorectal cancer pathogenesis: implications for molecular diagnosis. Tumour Biol. 2014;35:6195–206.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Bishehsari F, Mahdavinia M, Vacca M, Malekzadeh R, Mariani-Costantini R. Epidemiological transition of colorectal cancer in developing countries: environmental factors, molecular pathways, and opportunities for prevention. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:6055–72.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lochhead P, Kuchiba A, Imamura Y, et al. Microsatellite instability and braf mutation testing in colorectal cancer prognostication. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013;105:1151–6.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ogino S, Stampfer M. Lifestyle factors and microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer: the evolving field of molecular pathological epidemiology. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010;102:365–7.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ogino S, Chan AT, Fuchs CS, Giovannucci E. Molecular pathological epidemiology of colorectal neoplasia: an emerging transdisciplinary and interdisciplinary field. Gut. 2011;60:397–411.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Liao X, Lochhead P, Nishihara R, et al. Aspirin use, tumor PIK3CA mutation, and colorectal-cancer survival. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:1596–606.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Nishihara R, Lochhead P, Kuchiba A, et al. Aspirin use and risk of colorectal cancer according to BRAF mutation status. JAMA. 2013;309:2563–71.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Yamauchi M, Morikawa T, Kuchiba A, et al. Assessment of colorectal cancer molecular features along bowel subsites challenges the conception of distinct dichotomy of proximal versus distal colorectum. Gut. 2012;61:847–54.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Yamauchi M, Lochhead P, Morikawa T, et al. Colorectal cancer: a tale of two sides or a continuum? Gut. 2012;61:794–7.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Morikawa T, Shima K, Kuchiba A, et al. No evidence for interference of h&e staining in DNA testing: usefulness of DNA extraction from H&E-stained archival tissue sections. Am J Clin Pathol. 2012;138:122–9.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ogino S, Kawasaki T, Brahmandam M, et al. Sensitive sequencing method for KRAS mutation detection by pyrosequencing. J Mol Diagn. 2005;7:413–21.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Ogino S, Kawasaki T, Kirkner GJ, Loda M, Fuchs CS. CpG island methylator phenotype-low (CIMP-low) in colorectal cancer: possible associations with male sex and KRAS mutations. J Mol Diagn. 2006;8:582–8.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Nosho K, Kawasaki T, Ohnishi M, et al. PIK3CA mutation in colorectal cancer: relationship with genetic and epigenetic alterations. Neoplasia. 2008;10:534–41.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Liao X, Morikawa T, Lochhead P, et al. Prognostic role of PIK3CA mutation in colorectal cancer: cohort study and literature review. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18:2257–68.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Ogino S, Kawasaki T, Brahmandam M, et al. Precision and performance characteristics of bisulfite conversion and real-time PCR (MethyLight) for quantitative DNA methylation analysis. J Mol Diagn. 2006;8:209–17.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Ogino S, Kawasaki T, Kirkner GJ, Kraft P, Loda M, Fuchs CS. Evaluation of markers for CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) in colorectal cancer by a large population-based sample. J Mol Diagn. 2007;9:305–14.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Irahara N, Nosho K, Baba Y, et al. Precision of pyrosequencing assay to measure LINE-1 methylation in colon cancer, normal colonic mucosa, and peripheral blood cells. J Mol Diagn. 2010;12:177–83.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Kakar S, Smyrk TC. Signet ring cell carcinoma of the colorectum: correlations between microsatellite instability, clinicopathologic features and survival. Mod Pathol. 2005;18:244–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Messerini L, Ciantelli M, Baglioni S, Palomba A, Zampi G, Papi L. Prognostic significance of microsatellite instability in sporadic mucinous colorectal cancers. Hum Pathol. 1999;30:629–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Kakar S, Aksoy S, Burgart LJ, Smyrk TC. Mucinous carcinoma of the colon: correlation of loss of mismatch repair enzymes with clinicopathologic features and survival. Mod Pathol. 2004;17:696–700.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Arai T, Kasahara I, Sawabe M, et al. Microsatellite-unstable mucinous colorectal carcinoma occurring in the elderly: comparison with medullary type poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma. Pathol Int. 2007;57:205–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Leopoldo S, Lorena B, Cinzia A, et al. Two subtypes of mucinous adenocarcinoma of the colorectum: clinicopathological and genetic features. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:1429–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Chagpar R, Chiang YJ, Xing Y, et al. Neuroendocrine tumors of the colon and rectum: prognostic relevance and comparative performance of current staging systems. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:1170–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Kim SH, Shin SJ, Lee KY, et al. Prognostic value of mucinous histology depends on microsatellite instability status in patients with stage III colon cancer treated with adjuvant FOLFOX chemotherapy: a retrospective cohort study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:3407–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Shigaki H, Baba Y, Watanabe M, et al. LINE-1 hypomethylation in noncancerous esophageal mucosae is associated with smoking history. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:4238–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Suzuki H, Yamamoto E, Maruyama R, Niinuma T, Kai M. Biological significance of the CpG island methylator phenotype. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. In press.

  48. Kim JH, Kang GH. Molecular and prognostic heterogeneity of microsatellite-unstable colorectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:4230–43.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Reimers MS, Zeestraten ECM, Kuppen PJK, Liefers GJ, van de Velde CJH. Biomarkers in precision therapy in colorectal cancer. Gastroenterol Rep. 2013;1:166–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Barrow TM, Michels KB. Epigenetic epidemiology of cancer. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. In press.

  51. Herbert K, Kerr R, Kerr D, Church D. Are NSAIDs coming back to colorectal cancer therapy or not? Curr Colorect Cancer Rep. In press.

  52. Sung CO, Seo JW, Kim KM, Do IG, Kim SW, Park CK. Clinical significance of signet-ring cells in colorectal mucinous adenocarcinoma. Mod Pathol. 2008;21:1533–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Samowitz WS, Albertsen H, Herrick J, et al. Evaluation of a large, population-based sample supports a CpG island methylator phenotype in colon cancer. Gastroenterology. 2005;129:837–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Borger ME, Gosens MJ, Jeuken JW, van Kempen LC, van de Velde CJ, van Krieken JH, Nagtegaal ID. Signet ring cell differentiation in mucinous colorectal carcinoma. J Pathol. 2007;212:278–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Park ET, Gum JR, Kakar S, Kwon SW, Deng G, Kim YS. Aberrant expression of SOX2 upregulates MUC5AC gastric foveolar mucin in mucinous cancers of the colorectum and related lesions. Int J Cancer. 2008;122:1253–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Sentani K, Oue N, Tashiro T, et al. Immunohistochemical staining of Reg IV and claudin-18 is useful in the diagnosis of gastrointestinal signet ring cell carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2008;32:1182–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Hugen N, Verhoeven RH, Radema SA, et al. Prognosis and value of adjuvant chemotherapy in stage III mucinous colorectal carcinoma. Ann Oncol. 2013;24:2819–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Catalano V, Loupakis F, Graziano F, et al. Prognosis of mucinous histology for patients with radically resected stage II and III colon cancer. Ann Oncol. 2012;23:135–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Hugen N, Verhoeven RH, Lemmens VE, et al. Colorectal signet-ring cell carcinoma: benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy but a poor prognostic factor. Int J Cancer. In press.

Download references

Acknowledgment

We deeply thank hospitals and pathology departments throughout the United States for generously providing us with tissue specimens. In addition, we would like to thank the participants and staff of the Nurses’ Health Study and the Health Professionals Follow-Up Study, for their valuable contributions as well as the following state cancer registries for their help: AL, AZ, AR, CA, CO, CT, DE, FL, GA, ID, IL, IN, IA, KY, LA, ME, MD, MA, MI, NE, NH, NJ, NY, NC, ND, OH, OK, OR, PA, RI, SC, TN, TX, VA, WA, WY.

Disclosure

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Funding

This work was supported by U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants (P01 CA87969 to S.E. Hankinson; P01 CA55075 to W.C. Willett; UM1 CA167552 to W.C. Willett; P50 CA127003 to C.S.F.; and R01 CA151993 to S.O.); and by grants from the Bennett Family Fund and the Entertainment Industry Foundation through National Colorectal Cancer Research Alliance. K.I. was supported by a Japan Society for the Promotion of Science Postdoctoral Fellowship for Research Abroad and by Takashi Tsuruo Memorial Fund. S.A.K. is supported by an early exchange postdoctoral fellowship grant from Asan medical center. K.M. is supported by a fellowship grant from the Uehara Memorial Foundation. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of NIH. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Kentaro Inamura MD, PhD or Shuji Ogino MD, PhD, MS.

Additional information

Kentaro Inamura, Mai Yamauchi, Reiko Nishihara, and Sun A Kim contributed equally. Curtis C. Harris, Zhi Rong Qian, and Shuji Ogino contributed equally.

Use of Standardized Official Symbols

We use HUGO (Human Genome Organisation)-approved official symbols for genes and gene products, including BRAF; KRAS; PIK3CA; all of which are described at www.genenames.org.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 113 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Inamura, K., Yamauchi, M., Nishihara, R. et al. Prognostic Significance and Molecular Features of Signet-Ring Cell and Mucinous Components in Colorectal Carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 22, 1226–1235 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-4159-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-4159-7

Keywords

Navigation