Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Limited Prognostic Value of KRAS in Patients Undergoing Hepatectomy for Colorectal Liver Metastases

  • Hepatobiliary Tumors
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

RAS mutation status is considered a powerful prognostic factor in patients undergoing hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases (CLM). However, whether its prognostic power is robust regardless of administration of preoperative chemotherapy or tumor burden remains unclear.

Methods

Consecutive patients who underwent initial hepatectomy for CLM from April 2010 through March 2017 in two hospitals were included. The prognostic value of KRAS was compared based on whether patients received preoperative chemotherapy and their tumor burden score (TBS).

Results

We included 409 patients (median follow-up 38 months). In the preoperative chemotherapy group, patients with mutant KRAS (mt-KRAS) CLM had poorer overall survival (OS) than those with wild KRAS (wt-KRAS; 5-year OS: 37.7% vs 53.8%, p = 0.024), although their OS was not different from patients undergoing upfront surgery. Similarly, patients with mt-KRAS had poorer OS than those with wt-KRAS in TBS of 3–9 (5-year OS: 33.1% vs 63.2%, p = 0.001), although their OS was not different from patients with TBS < 3 or ≥ 9. In multivariate analysis, mt-KRAS was an independent prognostic factor of OS among patients receiving preoperative chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR] 1.61, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.034–2.491; p = 0.035) and patients with TBS of 3–9 (HR 1.836, 95% CI 1.176–2.866; p = 0.008). However, it was not a prognostic factor in patients who underwent upfront surgery or with TBS > 3 or ≥ 9.

Conclusions

In patients undergoing hepatectomy for CLM, the prognostic value of KRAS depends on their history of preoperative chemotherapy or tumor burden.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brudvik KW, Jones RP, Giuliante F, et al. RAS mutation clinical risk score to predict survival after resection of colorectal liver metastases. Ann Surg. 2019;269:120–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Van Cutsem E, Cervantes A, Adam R, et al. ESMO consensus guidelines for the management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol. 2016;27:1386–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zimmitti G, Shindoh J, Mise Y, et al. RAS mutations predict radiologic and pathologic response in patients treated with chemotherapy before resection of colorectal liver metastases. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:834–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Vauthey JN, Zimmitti G, Kopetz SE, et al. RAS mutation status predicts survival and patterns of recurrence in patients undergoing hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases. Ann Surg. 2013;258:619–26 ((discussion 626-617)).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Yamashita S, Chun YS, Kopetz SE, Vauthey JN. Biomarkers in colorectal liver metastases. Br J Surg. 2018;105:618–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Soreide K, Sandvik OM, Soreide JA. KRAS mutation in patients undergoing hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastasis: a biomarker of cancer biology or a byproduct of patient selection? Cancer. 2014;120:3862–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Margonis GA, Spolverato G, Kim Y, Karagkounis G, Choti MA, Pawlik TM. Effect of KRAS mutation on long-term outcomes of patients undergoing hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastases. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:4158–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sasaki K, Morioka D, Conci S, et al. The tumor burden score: a new, “metro-ticket” prognostic tool for colorectal liver metastases based on tumor size and number of tumors. Ann Surg. 2018;267:132–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Matsumura M, Mise Y, Saiura A, et al. Parenchymal-sparing hepatectomy does not increase intrahepatic recurrence in patients with advanced colorectal liver metastases. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23:3718–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Imai K, Allard MA, Castro Benitez C, et al. Nomogram for prediction of prognosis in patients with initially unresectable colorectal liver metastases. Br J Surg. 2016;103:590–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Passot G, Kim BJ, Glehen O, et al. Impact of RAS mutations in metastatic colorectal cancer after potentially curative resection: does site of metastases matter? Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25:179–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Brudvik KW, Mise Y, Chung MH, et al. RAS mutation predicts positive resection margins and narrower resection margins in patients undergoing resection of colorectal liver metastases. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23:2635–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Karagkounis G, Torbenson MS, Daniel HD, et al. Incidence and prognostic impact of KRAS and BRAF mutation in patients undergoing liver surgery for colorectal metastases. Cancer. 2013;119:4137–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Schirripa M, Bergamo F, Cremolini C, et al. BRAF and RAS mutations as prognostic factors in metastatic colorectal cancer patients undergoing liver resection. Br J Cancer. 2015;112:1921–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Shindoh J, Nishioka Y, Yoshioka R, et al. KRAS mutation status predicts site-specific recurrence and survival after resection of colorectal liver metastases irrespective of location of the primary lesion. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23:1890–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Umeda Y, Nagasaka T, Mori Y, et al. Poor prognosis of KRAS or BRAF mutant colorectal liver metastasis without microsatellite instability. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2013;20:223–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Cejas P, Lopez-Gomez M, Aguayo C, et al. KRAS mutations in primary colorectal cancer tumors and related metastases: a potential role in prediction of lung metastasis. PLoS ONE. 2009;4:e8199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lin Q, Ye Q, Zhu D, et al. Determinants of long-term outcome in patients undergoing simultaneous resection of synchronous colorectal liver metastases. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e105747.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Teng HW, Huang YC, Lin JK, et al. BRAF mutation is a prognostic biomarker for colorectal liver metastasectomy. J Surg Oncol. 2012;106:123–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kemeny NE, Chou JF, Capanu M, et al. KRAS mutation influences recurrence patterns in patients undergoing hepatic resection of colorectal metastases. Cancer. 2014;120:3965–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Rose JS, Serna DS, Martin LK, et al. Influence of KRAS mutation status in metachronous and synchronous metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma. Cancer. 2012;118:6243–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Russo A, Migliavacca M, Bazan V, et al. Prognostic significance of proliferative activity, DNA-ploidy, p53 and Ki-ras point mutations in colorectal liver metastases. Cell Prolif. 1998;31:139–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Margonis GA, Kim Y, Sasaki K, et al. Activating KRAS mutation is prognostic only among patients who receive preoperative chemotherapy before resection of colorectal liver metastases. J Surg Oncol. 2016;114:361–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Adam R, Bhangui P, Poston G, et al. Is perioperative chemotherapy useful for solitary, metachronous, colorectal liver metastases? Ann Surg. 2010;252:774–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Okuno M, Goumard C, Kopetz S, et al. RAS mutation is associated with unsalvageable recurrence following hepatectomy for colorectal cancer liver metastases. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25:2457–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Cremolini C, Casagrande M, Loupakis F, et al. Efficacy of FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab in liver-limited metastatic colorectal cancer: a pooled analysis of clinical studies by Gruppo Oncologico del Nord Ovest. Eur J Cancer. 2017;73:74–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Margonis GA, Sasaki K, Gholami S, et al. Genetic and morphological evaluation (GAME) score for patients with colorectal liver metastases. Br J Surg. 2018;105:1210–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Fong Y, Fortner J, Sun RL, Brennan MF, Blumgart LH. Clinical score for predicting recurrence after hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal cancer: analysis of 1001 consecutive cases. Ann Surg. 1999;230:309–18 (discussion 318–321).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. De Roock W, Claes B, Bernasconi D, et al. Effects of KRAS, BRAF, NRAS, and PIK3CA mutations on the efficacy of cetuximab plus chemotherapy in chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: a retrospective consortium analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11:753–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

None.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Akio Saiura MD, PhD.

Ethics declarations

Disclosure

None.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

10434_2021_11015_MOESM1_ESM.tiff

Supplemental Fig. 1 Kaplan–Meier estimates of recurrence-free survival stratified by KRAS mutation status in patients with tumor burden score (TBS) <3 (a), in those with TBS 3–9 (b), and in those with TBS >9 (c). RFS, recurrence-free survival. (TIFF 28566 kb)

Supplementary file2 (DOCX 40 kb)

10434_2021_11015_MOESM3_ESM.tiff

Supplemental Fig. 2 Kaplan–Meier estimates of extrahepatic recurrence-free survival stratified by KRAS mutation status in patients with tumor burden score (TBS) <3 (a), in those with TBS 3–9 (b), and in those with TBS >9 (c). EHRFS, extrahepatic recurrence-free survival. (TIFF 28566 kb)

10434_2021_11015_MOESM4_ESM.tiff

Supplemental Fig. 3 Kaplan–Meier estimates of overall survival stratified by tumor burden score in patients with KRAS wild-type (a) and in patients with KRAS mutant-type (b). OS, overall survival. (TIFF 28566 kb)

10434_2021_11015_MOESM5_ESM.tiff

Supplemental Fig. 4 Kaplan–Meier estimates of overall survival of patients with tumor burden score of 3–9 stratified by KRAS mutation status in patients receiving preoperative chemotherapy (a) and patients undergoing upfront surgery (b). OS, overall survival. (TIFF 28566 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Takeda, Y., Mise, Y., Takahashi, Y. et al. Limited Prognostic Value of KRAS in Patients Undergoing Hepatectomy for Colorectal Liver Metastases. Ann Surg Oncol 29, 2383–2391 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-021-11015-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-021-11015-9

Navigation