Skip to main content
Log in

Survival Outcomes After Metastasectomy in Melanoma Patients Categorized by Response to Checkpoint Blockade

  • Melanoma
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Checkpoint inhibitors have improved outcomes in metastatic melanoma, with 4-year overall survival (OS) of 46% for anti-PD-1 alone or 53% in combination with anti-CTLA-4. However, the median progression free survival is 6.9 and 11.5 months, respectively. Many who progress have gone on to alternative treatments, including surgery, yet the outcome of patients selected for surgery after checkpoint blockade remains unclear.

Methods

Patients who were treated with checkpoint blockade from 2003 to 2017, followed by metastasectomy, were identified from a prospectively maintained institutional melanoma database. Response to immunotherapy was assessed at the time of surgery. Patients were categorized as having responding, isolated progressing, or multiple progressing lesions.

Results

Of the 237 total patients identified, 208 (88%) had stage IV disease, and 29 (12%) had unresectable stage III disease at the start of immunotherapy. Median OS following first resection was 21 months. Median follow-up among survivors was 23 months. Complete resection at the first operation (n = 87, 37%) was associated with improved survival compared with patients with incomplete resection (n = 150, 63%) [median OS not reached (NR) vs. 10.8 months, respectively; 95% CI: 7.3, 14.8; p < 0.0001]. Patients resected for an isolated progressing or responding tumor had a longer median survival compared with those with multiple progressing lesions (NR vs. 7.8 months, 95% CI: 6.2, 11.2; p < 0.0001).

Conclusions

Patients selected for surgical resection following checkpoint blockade have a relatively favorable survival, especially if they had a response to immunotherapy and undergo complete resection of isolated progressing or responding disease.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Karakousis CP, Velez A, Driscoll DL, Takita H. Metastasectomy in malignant melanoma. Surgery. 1994;115:295–302.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ollila DW, Essner R, Wanek LA, Morton DL. Surgical resection for melanoma metastatic to the gastrointestinal tract. Arch Surg. 1996;131:975–9; 9–80.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fletcher WS, Pommier RF, Lum S, Wilmarth TJ. Surgical treatment of metastatic melanoma. Am J Surg. 1998;175:413–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Agrawal S, Yao TJ, Coit DG. Surgery for melanoma metastatic to the gastrointestinal tract. Ann Surg Oncol. 1999;6:336–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ollila DW, Hsueh EC, Stern SL, Morton DL. Metastasectomy for recurrent stage IV melanoma. J Surg Oncol. 1999;71:209–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wood TF, DiFronzo LA, Rose DM, et al. Does complete resection of melanoma metastatic to solid intra-abdominal organs improve survival? Ann Surg Oncol. 2001;8:658–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Petersen RP, Hanish SI, Haney JC, et al. Improved survival with pulmonary metastasectomy: an analysis of 1720 patients with pulmonary metastatic melanoma. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007;133:104–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Collinson FJ, Lam TK, Bruijn WM, et al. Long-term survival and occasional regression of distant melanoma metastases after adrenal metastasectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:1741–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mittendorf EA, Lim SJ, Schacherer CW, et al. Melanoma adrenal metastasis: natural history and surgical management. Am J Surg. 2008;195:363–8; discussion 8–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Neuman HB, Patel A, Hanlon C, Wolchok JD, Houghton AN, Coit DG. Stage-IV melanoma and pulmonary metastases: factors predictive of survival. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:2847–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sosman JA, Moon J, Tuthill RJ, et al. A phase 2 trial of complete resection for stage IV melanoma: results of Southwest Oncology Group Clinical Trial S9430. Cancer. 2011;117:4740–06.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Howard JH, Thompson JF, Mozzillo N, et al. Metastasectomy for distant metastatic melanoma: analysis of data from the first Multicenter Selective Lymphadenectomy Trial (MSLT-I). Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:2547–55.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Faries MB, Mozzillo N, Kashani-Sabet M, et al. Long-term survival after complete surgical resection and adjuvant immunotherapy for distant melanoma metastases. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24:3991–4000.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hodi FS, O’Day SJ, McDermott DF, et al. Improved survival with ipilimumab in patients with metastatic melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:711–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Chapman PB, Hauschild A, Robert C, et al. Improved survival with vemurafenib in melanoma with BRAF V600E mutation. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:2507–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Postow MA, Chesney J, Pavlick AC, et al. Nivolumab and ipilimumab versus ipilimumab in untreated melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:2006–17.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Larkin J, Chiarion-Sileni V, Gonzalez R, et al. Combined nivolumab and ipilimumab or monotherapy in untreated melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:23–34.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Larkin J, Hodi FS, Wolchok JD. Combined nivolumab and ipilimumab or monotherapy in untreated melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:1270–1.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Wolchok JD, Chiarion-Sileni V, Gonzalez R, et al. Overall survival with combined nivolumab and ipilimumab in advanced melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:1345–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Hodi FS, Chiarion-Sileni V, Gonzalez R, et al. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab or nivolumab alone versus ipilimumab alone in advanced melanoma (CheckMate 067): 4-year outcomes of a multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19:1480–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009;45:228–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wolchok JD, Hoos A, O’Day S, et al. Guidelines for the evaluation of immune therapy activity in solid tumors: immune-related response criteria. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15:7412–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Bartlett EK, Simmons KD, Wachtel H, et al. The rise in metastasectomy across cancer types over the past decade. Cancer. 2015;121:747–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. He M, Lovell J, Ng BL, et al. Post-operative survival following metastasectomy for patients receiving BRAF inhibitor therapy is associated with duration of pre-operative treatment and elective indication. J Surg Oncol. 2015;111:980–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Prabhakaran S, Fulp WJ, Gonzalez RJ, et al. Resection of gastrointestinal metastases in stage IV melanoma: correlation with outcomes. Am Surg. 2016;82:1109–16.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Deutsch GB, Flaherty DC, Kirchoff DD, et al. Association of surgical treatment, systemic therapy, and survival in patients with abdominal visceral melanoma metastases, 1965–2014: relevance of Surgical Cure in the Era of Modern Systemic Therapy. JAMA Surg. 2017;152:672–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Meyer T, Merkel S, Goehl J, Hohenberger W. Surgical therapy for distant metastases of malignant melanoma. Cancer. 2000;89:1983–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Cassidy MR, Wolchok RE, Zheng J, et al. Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio is associated with outcome during ipilimumab treatment. EBioMedicine. 2017;18:56–61.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Grimes N, Hannan C, Tyson M, Thwaini A. The role of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio as a prognostic indicator in patients undergoing nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. Can Urol Assoc J. 2018;12:E345–E8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhou B, Zhan C, Wu J, Liu J, Zhou J, Zheng S. Prognostic significance of preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in surgically resectable pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Med Sci Monit. 2017;23:5574–88.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Abe T, Amano H, Kobayashi T, et al. Preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as a prognosticator in early stage pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018;44:1573–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kubo H, Murayama Y, Arita T, Kuriu Y, Nakanishi M, Otsuji E. The prognostic value of preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in colorectal cancer. World J Surg. 2016;40:2796–802.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kim H, Jung HI, Kwon SH, et al. Preoperative neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and CEA is associated with poor prognosis in patients with synchronous colorectal cancer liver metastasis. Ann Surg Treat Res. 2019;96:191–200.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Wronski M, Arbit E. Surgical treatment of brain metastases from melanoma: a retrospective study of 91 patients. J Neurosurg. 2000;93:9–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Fife KM, Colman MH, Stevens GN, et al. Determinants of outcome in melanoma patients with cerebral metastases. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:1293–300.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Davies MA, Liu P, McIntyre S, et al. Prognostic factors for survival in melanoma patients with brain metastases. Cancer. 2011;117:1687–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Kluger HM, Chiang V, Mahajan A, et al. Long-term survival of patients with melanoma with active brain metastases treated with pembrolizumab on a Phase II Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37:52–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Yang JC, Abad J, Sherry R. Treatment of oligometastases after successful immunotherapy. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2006;16:131–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Faries MB, Leung A, Morton DL, et al. A 20-year experience of hepatic resection for melanoma: is there an expanding role? J Am Coll Surg. 2014;219:62–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Gyorki DE, Yuan J, Mu Z, et al. Immunological insights from patients undergoing surgery on ipilimumab for metastatic melanoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:3106–11.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Zaretsky JM, Garcia-Diaz A, Shin DS, et al. Mutations associated with acquired resistance to PD-1 blockade in Melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:819–29.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This research was funded in part through the NIH/NCI Cancer Center Support Grant P30 CA008748, Ludwig Collaborative and Swim Across America Laboratory, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Danielle M. Bello MD.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

This study was presented in plenary podium format at the 71st Annual Meeting of the Society of Surgical Oncology, March 21–24, 2018, Chicago, IL. Drs. Hollmann, Coit, and Brady have no disclosures. Dr. Bello has worked as a consultant for survivornet. Dr. Panageas has stock ownership in Johnson and Johnson, Pfizer, Viking Therapeutics, and Catalyst Biotech. Dr. Shoushtari serves on the advisory board for Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS), Castle Biosciences, and Immunocore. He receives institutional research support from BMS, Immunocore, AstraZeneca, and Xcovery. Dr. Chapman receives consulting, advisory, or speaking compensation from Immunocore, Merck, Cell Medica, Takeda Millenium, and AstraZeneca. He holds stock in Rgenix. He receives research support from Pfizer. Dr. Postow has worked as a consultant for: BMS, Merck, Array BioPharma, Novartis, Incyte, NewLink Genetics, Aduro. He has received honoraria from: BMS and Merck. He receives institutional research support from: RGenix, Infinity, BMS, Merck, Array BioPharma, Novartis, and AstraZeneca. Dr. Callahan reports grants from and employment of a family member by BMS; personal fees for advisory/consulting role from AstraZeneca/MedImmune, Incyte, Moderna and Merck. Dr. Wolchok is a consultant for: Adaptive Biotech, Advaxis, Amgen, Apricity, Array BioPharma, Ascentage Pharma, Astellas, Bayer, Beigene, BMS, Celgene, Chugai, Elucida, Eli Lilly, F Star, Genentech, Imvaq, Janssen, Kleo Pharma, Linneaus, MedImmune, Merck, Neon Therapeutics, Ono Pharmaceuticals, Polaris Pharma, Polynoma, Psioxus, Puretech, Recepta, Sellas Life Sciences, Serametrix, Surface Oncology, Syndax. He receives research support from: BMS, Medimmune, Genentech. He has equity in: Potenza Therapeutics, Tizona Pharmaceuticals, Adaptive Biotechnologies, Elucida, Imvaq, Beigene, Trieza, Serametrix, Linneaus. He receives honorarium from: Esanex. Dr. Ariyan served on an advisory board for BMS.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bello, D.M., Panageas, K.S., Hollmann, T. et al. Survival Outcomes After Metastasectomy in Melanoma Patients Categorized by Response to Checkpoint Blockade. Ann Surg Oncol 27, 1180–1188 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-019-08099-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-019-08099-9

Navigation