Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Patient Navigation and the Quality of Breast Cancer Care: An Analysis of the Breast Cancer Care Quality Indicators

  • Breast Oncology
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Patient navigation programs are initiated to help guide patients through barriers in a complex cancer care system. We sought to analyze the impact of our patient navigator program on the adherence to specific Breast Cancer Care Quality Indicators (BCCQI).

Methods

A retrospective cohort of patients with stage I–III breast cancer seen the calendar year prior to the initiation of the patient navigation program were compared with patients treated in the ensuing two calendar years. Quality indicators deemed appropriate for analysis were those associated with overcoming barriers to treatment and those associated with providing health education and improving patient decision-making.

Results

A total of 134 consecutive patients between January 1, 2006 and December 31, 2006 and 234 consecutive patients between January 1, 2008 and December 31, 2009 were evaluated for compliance with the BCCQI. There was no significant difference in the mean age or race/ethnic distribution of the study population. In all ten BCCQI evaluated, there was improvement in the percentage of patients in compliance from pre and post implementation of a patient navigator program (range 2.5–27.0 %). Overall, compliance with BCCQI improved from 74.1 to 95.5 % (p < 0.0001). Indicators associated with informed decision-making and patient preference achieved statistical significance, while only completion axillary node dissection in sentinel node-positive biopsies in the process of treatment achieved statistical significance.

Conclusions

The implementation of a patient navigator program improved breast cancer care as measured by BCCQI. The impact on disease-free and overall survival remains to be determined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ensuring quality cancer care. National cancer policy board, Institute of Medicine and National Research Council. Washington, DC: National Academies; 1999.

  2. The Commonwealth Fund Commission on high performance health system, Why not the best? Results from the National Scorecard on U.S. health system performance. The Common Wealth Fund October 2011.

  3. Shavers VL, Brown ML. Racial and ethnic disparities in the receipt of cancer treatment. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002;94:334–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Elmore JG, Nakano CY, Linden HM, Reisch LM, Ayanian JZ, Larson EB. Racial inequities in the timing of breast cancer detection, diagnosis, and initiation of treatment. Med Care. 2005;43:141–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Natale-Pereira A, Enard KR, Nevarez L, Jones LA. The role of patient navigators in eliminating health disparities. Cancer. 2011;117:3543–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wells KJ, Battaglia TA, Dudley DJ, et al. Patient navigation: state of the art or is it science? Cancer 2008;113:1999–2010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hewitt ME, Simone J. National Cancer Policy Board, Institute of Medicine: Ensuring Quality Cancer Care. Washington, DC; 1999.

  8. Edwards BK, Brown ML, Wingo PA, et al. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975–2002, featuring population-based trends in cancer treatment. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97:1407–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Malin JL, Schneider EC, Epstein AM, Adams J, Emanuel EJ, Kahn KL. Results of the national initiative for cancer care quality: how can we improve the quality of cancer care in the United States? J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:626–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Donelan K, Mailhot JR, Dutwin D, et al. Patient perspectives of clinical care and patient navigation in follow-up of abnormal mammography. J Gen Intern Med. 2011;26:116–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. North Carolina State Center for Health Statistics. http://wwwschsstatencus/SCHS/.

  12. Lohrisch C, Paltiel C, Gelmon K, et al. Impact on survival of time from definitive surgery to initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:4888–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Palmieri FM, DePeri ER, Mincey BA, et al. Comprehensive diagnostic program for medically underserved women with abnormal breast screening evaluations in an urban population. Mayo Clin Proc. 2009;84:317–22.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Guadagnoli E, Shapiro CL, Weeks JC, Gurwitz JH, Borbas C, Soumerai SB. The quality of care for treatment of early stage breast carcinoma: is it consistent with national guidelines? Cancer. 1998;83:302–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Battaglia TA, Roloff K, Posner MA, Freund KM. Improving follow-up to abnormal breast cancer screening in an urban population. A patient navigation intervention. Cancer. 2007;109:359–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Cheng SH, Wang CJ, Lin JL, et al. Adherence to quality indicators and survival in patients with breast cancer. Med Care. 2009;47:217–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Parker VA, Clark JA, Leyson J, et al. Patient navigation: development of a protocol for describing what navigators do. Health Serv Res. 2010;45:514–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ferrante JM, Chen PH, Kim S. The effect of patient navigation on time to diagnosis, anxiety, and satisfaction in urban minority women with abnormal mammograms: a randomized controlled trial. J Urban Health. 2008;85:114–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Commission of Cancer, Cancer Program Standards 2012: Ensuring Patient-Centered Care, v1.0. http://wwwfacsorg/cancer/coc/cocprogramstandards2012pdf.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jan H. Wong MD.

Appendix: Quality Indicators Interpreted as Potentially Impacted by the Patient Navigation Program

Appendix: Quality Indicators Interpreted as Potentially Impacted by the Patient Navigation Program

  1. 1.

    BR-1B1: IF a patient with new diagnosis of stage I–III breast cancer meets all of the following criteria:

    1. 1.

      Age <70 years AND

    2. 2.

      Tumor size >1 cm AND

    3. 3.

      No evidence of metastatic disease within 3 months of diagnosis AND

    4. 4.

      There is no documentation in the medical record that axillary lymph node sampling would not change treatment, THEN the patient should have axillary lymph node sampling.

  1. 2.

    BR-1B2: IF a patient has a SN biopsy that is positive, THEN the patient should undergo axillary lymph node dissection.

  2. 3.

    BR-2A4: IF a patient has new diagnosis of stage I–III breast cancer, THEN the patient should receive one of the following surgical treatments:

    1. 1.

      BCS OR

    2. 2.

      Mastectomy

  1. 4.

    BR-2B1: IF a patient newly diagnosed with stage I–III breast cancer meets all of the following criteria:

    1. 1.

      ER+ or PR+ breast cancer AND

    2. 2.

      Tumor size ≥1 cm or involved axillary lymph nodes AND

    3. 3.

      Was not taking tamoxifen WITHIN 6 MONTHS before diagnosis, THEN the patient should be started on tamoxifen or an aromatase inhibitor.

  1. 5.

    BR-2B3: IF a patient newly diagnosed with stage II–III breast cancer is <50 years old AND the tumor is >2 cm or the tumor involves the lymph nodes, THEN the patient should receive chemotherapy.

  2. 6.

    BR-2B4: IF a patient is newly diagnosed with stage I–III breast cancer and the tumor is ≥1 cm or involves the lymph nodes, THEN a physician should have a discussion with the patient regarding possible treatment with chemotherapy.

  3. 7.

    BR-2B5: IF a patient newly diagnosed with stage II–III breast cancer is <50 years old and the tumor is >2 cm or the tumor involves the lymph nodes, THEN the patient should start adjuvant chemotherapy within 8 weeks of the last therapeutic surgery.

  4. 8.

    BR-2C2a: IF a patient with diagnosis of stage I–III breast cancer has BCS, THEN the patient should receive local radiation therapy.

  5. 9.

    BR-2C3a: IF a patient with invasive breast cancer who undergoes mastectomy has any of the following:

    1. 1.

      Positive margins on the surgical specimen OR

    2. 2.

      Tumor size >5 cm OR

    3. 3.

      Four or more involved lymph nodes OR

    4. 4.

      A T4 lesion, THEN the patient should receive radiotherapy.

  1. 10.

    BR-2C5: IF a patient begins radiation therapy treatments and does not meet one of the following exclusion criteria:

    1. 1.

      Hospitalized during treatment OR

    2. 2.

      Grade 4 toxicity, THEN the planned radiation therapy should be completed.

  1. 11.

    BR-3B2: IF a patient who is postmenopausal taking tamoxifen has vaginal bleeding, THEN the patient should have had at least one of the following evaluations:

    1. 1.

      Endometrial biopsy

    2. 2.

      Pelvic transvaginal ultrasound

    3. 3.

      Referrals

  1. 12.

    BR-4-1: IF a patient with stage I–III breast cancer undergoes BCS and did not receive radiation therapy, THEN the patient should have a consultation with a radiation oncologist.

  2. 13.

    BR-4-2: IF a patient with invasive breast cancer:

    1. A.

      Undergoes a mastectomy AND

    2. B.

      Has any of the following:

    1. 1.

      Positive margins on the surgical specimen OR

    2. 2.

      Tumor size >5 cm OR

    3. 3.

      Four or more involved lymph nodes OR

    4. 4.

      A T4 lesion, THEN the patient should have a consultation with a radiation oncologist.

  1. 14.

    BR-5-2: IF a patient has a new diagnosis of stage I–III breast cancer and does not undergo axillary lymph node sampling, THEN the patient should be informed about the options of a surgical check or removal of lymph nodes under the arm.

  2. 15.

    BR-5-4: IF a patient with stage I–III breast cancer undergoes mastectomy as first therapeutic procedure, THEN before undergoing mastectomy, the patient should be informed about the options to have either BCS followed by radiation therapy or mastectomy.

  3. 16.

    BR-5-5-1: IF a patient with stage I–II breast cancer undergoes mastectomy, THEN before undergoing mastectomy, the patient should be informed about the option of breast reconstruction after mastectomy.

  4. 17.

    BR-7-2: If a patient has stage I–III breast and has not had bilateral mastectomies, then they should have a mammogram in the last 12 months.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Weber, J.J., Mascarenhas, D.C., Bellin, L.S. et al. Patient Navigation and the Quality of Breast Cancer Care: An Analysis of the Breast Cancer Care Quality Indicators. Ann Surg Oncol 19, 3251–3256 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-012-2527-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-012-2527-8

Keywords

Navigation