Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of degree of polymerization on behavior of cellulose during homogenization and extrusion/spheronization

  • Published:
AAPS PharmSci Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study objective was to investigate the influence of the degree of polymerization (DP) of cellulose materials (microcrystalline cellulose [MCC] and powder cellulose [PC]) on the behavior of these materials during homogenization and extrusion/spheronization processes. Suspensions of the cellulose types with different DP values were homogenized using a high-pressure homogenizer. The particle size, agglomeration index, and apparent viscosity of these suspensions was determined at different times after pouring. Additionally, these different cellulose types were processed into pellets using the extrusion/spheronization, method, and the water content and power consumption as a function of the DP were determined. Cellulose types with a high DP value showed greater particle size after homogenization, than the types with a low DP value. In contrast, no relevant relationship between the apparent viscosity and DP could be observed. During the extrusion process, water content in the extrudate and pellet porosity were increased as the DP was increased for the extrudates produced at the same level of power consumption. MCC types with various DPs compared with PC provided a novel way of understanding the role of cellulose in the extrusion process. The DP showed a remarkable influence on the physicochemical properties of the cellulose materials and, consequently, on the behavior of these materials during the extrusion/spheronization process. It is postulated that the sponge model is more appropriate for the cellulose type with high DP (PC), whereas the gel model is more applicable to cellulose types with lower DP (MCC).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kleinebudde P, Sølvberg AJ, Lindner H. The powerconsumption-controlled extruder-;a tool for pellet production. J Pharm Pharmacol. 1994;46:542–546.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kleinebudde P. Use of a power-consumption-controlled extruder in the development of pellet formulations. J Pharm Sci. 1995;84:1259–1264.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Fielden KE, Newton JM. Extrusion and extruders. In: Swarbrick J, Boylan JC, Eds. Encyclopedia of Pharmaceutical Technology, Vol. 5. New York, Basel: Marcel Dekker, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lindner H, Kleinebudde P. Use of powdered cellulose for the production of pellets by extrusion/spheronization. J Pharm Pharmacol. 1994;46:2–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bataille B, Amourdedieu A, Sonaglio D, et al. Preformulation in extrusion-spheronization: behavioural study of two microcel cellulose grades. Pharmazie. 1997;52:138–144.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Miyake Y, Shinoda A, Uesugi K, Furukawa M, Nasu T. The influence of amount of water on granulation efficiency and physical properties of spherical granules prepared by extrusion-spheronization processing. Yakuzaigaku. 1973;33:167–171.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Iyer RM, Augsburger LL, Pope DG, Shah RD. Extrusion/spheronization-;effect of moisture content and spheronization time on pellet characteristics. Pharm Dev Technol. 1996;1: 325–331.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Schmidt C, Kleinebudde P. Significance of the granulation step in pelletization by extrusion/spheronization. Chem Pharm Bull. 1999;47:405–412.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Vervaet C, Baert L, Remon JP. Extrusion-spheronisation. A literature review. Int J Pharm. 1995;116:131–146.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Fielden KE, Newton JM, Rowe RC. The influence of moisture content on spheronization of extrudate processed by a ram extruder. Int J Pharm. 1993;97:79–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Tomer G, Newton JM. Water movement evaluation during extrusion of wet powder masses by collecting extrudate fractions. Int J Pharm. 1999;182:71–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ek R, Newton MJ. Microcrystalline cellulose as a sponge as an alternative concept to the crystalline-gel model for extrusion and spheronization. Pharm Res. 1998;15:509–510.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kleinebudde P. The crystallite-gel-model for microcrystalline cellulose in wet-granulation, extrusion, and spheronization. Pharm Res. 1997;14:804–809.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Newton JM, Chow AK, Jeewa KB. The effect of excipient source on spherical granules made by extrusion/spheronization. Pharm Tech Int. 1992;4 October:52–58.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Law ML, Deasy PB, McLaughlin JP, Gabriel SG. Comparison of two commercial brands of microcrystalline cellulose for extrusion-spheronization. J Microencapsulation. 1997;14:713–723

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Jumaa M, El Saleh F, Hassan I, Müller BW, Kleinebudde P. Influence of cellulose type on the properties of extruded pellets. Part I: Physicochemical characterisation of the cellulose types after homogenization. Colloid Polym Sci. 2000;278:597–607.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. El Saleh F, Jumaa M, Hassan I, Kleinebudde P. Influence of cellulose type on the properties of extruded pellets. Part II: Production and properties of pellets. STP Pharma Science. In press.

  18. Rowe RC, McKillop AG, Bray D. The effect of batch and source variation on the crystallinity of microcrystalline cellulose. Int J Pharm. 1994;101:169–172.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Knolle H, Jayme G. Über ein digitales Verfahren zur empirischen Bestimmung der Röntgenkristallinität cellulosehaltiger Stoffe und seine Anwendung. Das Papier. 1965;19:106–110.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Microcrystalline cellulose. In: European Pharmacopoeia. 3rd ed. Stuttgart: Deutscher Apotheker Verlag; 1997;665–666.

  21. Dong XM, Revol JF, Gray DG. Effect of microcrystallite preparation conditions on the formation of colloid crystals of cellulose. Cellulose. 1998;5:91–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bleich JU, Kleinebudde P, Müller BW. Influence of gas density and pressure on microparticles produced with the ASES process. Int J Pharm. 1994;106:77–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Thies J, Müller BW. Size controlled production of biodegradable microparticles with supercritical gases. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 1998;45:66–74.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lindner H, Kleinebudde P. Application of automatic image analysis for the characterization of pellets (German). Pharm Ind. 1993;55:694–701.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ek R, Alderborn G, Nystroem C. Particle analysis of microcrystalline cellulose: differentiation between individual particles and their agglomerates. Int J Pharm. 1994;111:43–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Kleinebudde P. Shrinking and swelling of pellets containing microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) and low substituted hydroxypropylcellulose (L-HPC). Part I: Shrinking properties. Int J Pharm. 1994;109:209–219.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Suzuki T, Nakagami H. Effect of crystallinity of microcrystalline cellulose on the compactability and dissolution of tablets. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 1999;47;225–230.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ono H, Yamada H, Matsuda S, Okajima K, Kawamoto T, Iijima H: 1H-NMR relaxation of water molecules in the aqueous microcrystalline cellulose suspension systems and their viscosity. Cellulose. 1998;5:231–247.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

published July 21, 2000

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kleinebudde, P., Jumaa, M. & El Saleh, F. Influence of degree of polymerization on behavior of cellulose during homogenization and extrusion/spheronization. AAPS PharmSci 2, 23 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1208/ps020321

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1208/ps020321

Keywords

Navigation