Main

OSA is a frequent condition affecting up to 2% to 3% of all children and is associated with substantial neurobehavioral and cardiovascular morbidities (13). In the United States alone, it is estimated that two million children suffer from OSA. However, many more children (8%–27%) habitually snore during their sleep and are at risk of OSA (1,2,48). Clinical history and physical examination are remarkably unpredictive in the differentiation between OSA and HS (9) such that current diagnostic approaches require implementation of ONP. However, ONP is laborious, expensive, and relatively unavailable to children. Furthermore, ONP imposes a substantial burden to both child and family.

Proteomic mass spectrometry coupled with advanced bioinformatic techniques has recently been introduced as a novel approach for developing new diagnostic and prognostic tools for various diseases (10,11). SELDI-TOF MS, which is based on the capture of proteins/peptides on chemically modified surfaces, has emerged as a specifically powerful tool allowing analysis of complex biologic samples (12,13). For example, SELDI-TOF MS has been successfully used in the analysis of serum proteins to reveal disease-specific “fingerprints” or “patterns” that have proven useful in the early-stage detection of particular diseases due to its high specificity and sensitivity in segregating diseased patients from those without disease (1416). Furthermore, the feasibility of high sample throughput and low volume sample requirements make this approach particularly valuable for discovery of new disease-specific biomarkers in children.

In this study, we used SELDI-TOF MS strategies and examined sera of 20 snoring children with OSA and of 20 snoring children who did not fulfill the polysomnographic criteria for OSA (i.e. HS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study participants.

The study was approved by the University of Louisville Human Research Committee. Parental informed consent and child assent, in the presence of a parent, were obtained. Children were excluded if they had any chronic medical condition, psychiatric diagnoses, or any genetic or craniofacial syndromes.

Morning serum samples were obtained from 20 consecutive snoring children fulfilling the criteria for OSA (see below), and from 20 consecutive children fulfilling the criteria for habitual snoring (HS). Their ages ranged between 3 and 12 y, and all were referred for evaluation of snoring as their primary complaint and therefore underwent an overnight sleep study at the Kosair Childen's Hospital Sleep Medicine and Apnea Center. Based on their polysomnographic findings, children were assigned to one of two categorical groups: group OSA, 20 children with an obstructive apnea/hypopnea index (AHI) >5 events/h of sleep, combined with oxyhemoglobin desaturation episodes (<92%) and/or hypercapnia (>50 mm Hg), and/or respiratory arousal index >2/hour of sleep and group HS, 20 children with AHI <1/h of sleep without oxyhemoglobin desaturation and/or hypercapnia, and with a respiratory arousal index ≤2/h of sleep.

Overnight polysomnography.

A standard overnight multichannel polysomnographic evaluation was performed in the sleep laboratory at Kosair Children's Hospital. Children were studied for up to 12 h in a quiet, darkened room with an ambient temperature of 24°C in the company of one of their parents. No drugs were used to induce sleep. The following parameters were measured: chest and abdominal wall movement by respiratory impedance or inductance plethysmography and heart rate by electrocardiography; air flow was monitored with a sidestream end-tidal capnograph that also provided breath-by-breath assessment of end-tidal carbon dioxide levels (Petco2; BCI SC-300, Menomonee Falls, WI), a nasal pressure transducer, and a thermistor. Arterial oxygen saturation (SpO2) was assessed by pulse oximetry (Nellcor N 100; Nellcor Inc., Hayward, CA), with simultaneous recording of the pulse waveform. The bilateral electro-oculography, eight-channel electroencephalography, chin and anterior tibial electromyography, and analog output from a body position sensor (Braebon Medical Corporation, NY) were also monitored. All measures were digitized using a commercially available polysomnography system (Rembrandt, MedCare Diagnostics, Amsterdam, The Netherlands). Tracheal sound was monitored with a microphone sensor (Sleepmate, VA) and a digital time-synchronized video recording was performed. Sleep architecture was assessed by standard techniques (17). The proportion of time spent in rapid eye movement (REM) sleep was expressed as the percentage of total sleep time (TST). The obstructive apnea index (AI) was defined as the number of apneas episodes per hour of TST. Obstructive apnea was defined as the absence of airflow with continued chest wall and abdominal movement for duration of at least two breaths (18,19). Hypopnea was defined as a decrease in nasal flow of ≥50% with a corresponding decrease in SpO2 of ≥4% and/or arousal (19). The apnea/hypopnea index (AHI) was defined as the number of apnea and hypopnea episodes per hour of TST. Children with an AHI <1/h TST were considered to have habitual snoring (HS), while children with AHI ≥5/h TST were considered to have OSA. The mean oxygen saturation, as measured by pulse oximetry (SpO2) in the presence of a pulse waveform signal void of motion artifact, and the SpO2 nadir were recorded. Since criteria for arousals have not yet been developed for children, arousals were defined as recommended by the American Sleep Disorders Association Task Force report (20) using the 3-s rule and/or the presence of movement arousal (21). Arousals were divided into two subtypes: spontaneous arousals and respiratory arousals. The arousal indices were calculated per hour of sleep time.

SELDI protein profiling of serum.

Four chip types including weak cation exchange (WCX4) with low stringency (pH 4), metal binding (IMAC-Cu2+), immobilized metal affinity capture, strong cation exchange (SAX2) and hydrophobic (H4) chips were used to profile the serum samples collected from the OSA and HS children. We used a modified analytical protocol provided by the manufacturer (Ciphergen Biosystems, Fremont, CA) for chip activation, equilibration, binding, washing, and reading.

Chip activation.

IMAC chips were activated by addition of CuSO4. This was done by adding 50 μL of 100 mmol/L CuSO4 in a 96-well formatted Bioprocessor (Ciphergen Biosystems) for 5 min at room temperature. The unbound Cu2+ was then removed; chips were rinsed by dH2O and 100 mmol/L Na acetate (pH 4.0). Other chip types did not require activation.

Chip equilibration.

All chip types were equilibrated with their perspective binding/washing buffers according to manufacturer's instructions. Appropriate buffers for a given chip type (150 μL) was added to each chip type (IMAC-Cu 2+; 100 mmol/L Na phosphate, pH 7.0 + 500 mmol/L NaCl, WCX4; 100 mmol/L Na acetate, pH 4.0, SAX2; 10 mmol/L Tris, pH 8.0, H4; 50 mmol/L HEPES, pH 7.0) in a 96-well Bioprocessor and incubated for 5 min. Then, the buffer was removed by dumping in collection trays.

Protein binding.

After thawing, the serum samples were mixed and centrifuged at 1000 rpm at 4°C for 10 min. Twenty microliters of serum was added into the 96-well plate containing mixture of 30 μL of 8 mol/L urea, 1% CHAPS/PBS (pH 7.4), sealed and subjected to shake at 4°C for 15–30 min.

Chip binding.

In an assembled 96-well Bioprocessor containing the appropriate chips, 5 μL of fractionated serum samples were added to 195 μL of binding/washing buffer.

Chip washing.

All chip arrays were first incubated in their respective binding/washing buffers for 5 min and buffers removed, which was repeated three times. Finally, chips were washed twice by adding 200 μL of dH2O, followed by dissembling the bioprocessor and chip drying with the help of Kim wipes. Spots on chips were circled with a PAP pen and 1 μL of SPA as EAMs (electron absorbing molecules) was added twice.

Chip reading.

We used two protocols developed in our laboratory for low- and high-mass focusing to read each chip. The low focusing has a mass range from 1000 to 50,000 Da with optimization at 3000 to 30,000 Da. The laser intensity will be set at 285 and the instrument sensitivity at 9. For the high-mass focusing, we set the high threshold at 200,000 Da with an optimization range of 10,000 to 60,000 Da and a laser intensity of 290 with a sensitivity setting of 9.

Peak detection/normalization.

All spectra were initially visually inspected. If the matrix peaks were missing or depressed below a 30% log normalized value, the spectra were eliminated from final data analysis. All spectra were calibrated and normalized according to the manufacturer's instructions using the Biomarker Wizard Software (Ciphergen Biosystems). The peaks were detected using the same software and a “.csv” output was generated for each experiment using this software. The unsupervised qualitative inspection of peaks and data clustering were performed at this stage. Then, the “.csv” files were imported into Biomarker Pattern Software (BPS) software for data mining analysis.

Decision tree and cross-validation.

We used linear discriminative analysis using BPS (Ciphergen Biosystems), which allows for supervised classification analysis capable of varying splitting rules, cost values, and creation of decision trees. BPS is designed to analyze large data sets and discover protein patterns that can be related to treatment and/or to pathology due to treatment. In this study, we considered a biomarker pattern as potentially useful if HS and OSA patients were distinguished with a sensitivity and specificity >90%. Decision tree classifies a spectrum pattern through a sequence of questions, in which the next question asked depends on the answer to the previous question. The sequence of questions forms a node connected by successive links or branches downward to other nodes.

Protein identification.

Preliminary identification of the discovered proteins using the isoelectric point (pI) and molecular mass information was performed using the Swiss-Prot database.

RESULTS

Subject characteristics.

Table 1 shows the demographic and polysomnographic characteristics of 20 children with sleep disordered breathing (OSA), and 20 HS children. Both groups were comparable for age, gender, and body mass index. The OSA group had higher mean AHI and arousal index, with lower SaO2 nadir, and similar mean end-tidal CO2 tension (Table 1).

Table 1 Demographic and polysomnographic characteristics in children with habitual snoring and children with OSA syndrome

Decision tree/data analysis.

The mass range of 0–2000 Da was eliminated from data analysis because of interference by matrix peaks. To identify serum biomarkers capable of distinguishing the children with OSA from HS but no evidence of OSA, we constructed a decision-tree classification algorithm using over 100 peaks within the 2000- to 40,000-Da range. The classification algorithm was developed using the cross-validation technique included in the BPS software and involved three nodes with distinct masses (5896, 3306, 6068 Da) as shown in Figure 1A and B. The discriminatory peaks were able to efficiently distinguish 17 of 18 (94%) children with OSA and 20 of 20 (100%) HS without OSA (Table 2). In the test group of the cross-validation, 15 of 18 (83%) OSA children and 18 of 20 (90%) non-OSA snorers were identified (Table 2). Figure 2A and B represent the spectra and gel view of OSA and HS set of samples, respectively. A peak at 5896 Da is clearly observed in the OSA set of samples. On the other hand, the same peak was either absent or clearly attenuated in the HS group. The biomarker protein at the putative mass of 5896 Da with stringency wash at pH.4 was subjected to the Swiss-prot database search with the ranges: molecular mass = 5896, pI = 4, delta pI = 1.00, delta molecular mass = 2%, organism species (OS) or organism classification (OC) human. We found eight proteins in the database in the specified pI/molecular mass ranges. Of the eight candidate proteins, seven were from the family of Gag polyproteins belonging to the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). The chance of the identity of this protein being a HIV protein present in serum samples from almost all OSA children and being absent in all non-OSA subjects is highly unlikely. The most likely candidate is osteocalcin precursor (gamma-carboxyglutamic acid containing protein) with a molecular mass of 5799.49 and a pI 4.40. This protein constitutes 1% to 2% of the total bone protein. It binds strongly to apatite and calcium. The calcium binding requires gamma-carboxyglutamate residues that are formed by vitamin K–dependent carboxylation (22).

Figure 1
figure 1

(A) Diagram of a single best decision tree showing the molecular mass of the biomarker proteins and total number of samples. (B) Graph showing the sensitivity and specificity of the discovered biomarker protein with 0.996 receiver operating characteristic (ROC) integral level.

Table 2 Decision tree analysis of proteomic spectral patterns during the learning and test phases
Figure 2
figure 2

Representative spectra from the serum of three children with OSA (A) and from three children with habitual snoring (B). A peak is clearly recognizable at a molecular mass 5900 Da in all OSA subjects and is absent in all HS children.

DISCUSSION

The major findings of the present study indicate that among snoring children, those with clearly defined sleep-disordered breathing and who require referral for treatment can be accurately differentiated using the differential expression of a selected number of proteins in their morning serum samples from snoring children who are not currently considered as candidates for therapy (23).

Before we discuss the potential significance of our findings, some technical issues deserve comment. First, serum samples have been previously used in the discovery process of novel biomarkers using protein mass spectrometry techniques (2427). Indeed, SELDI approaches offer a sensitive alternative to two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis for discovering of disease-associated proteins. The process of SELDI involves purified or partially purified proteins mixed with EAMs, a crystal-forming matrix, placed on an inert metal target, and subjected to a pulsed laser beam to produce gas phase ions that traverse a field-free flight tube and then are separated according to their mass-dependent velocities (28). Particular precautions were taken to standardize the timing of serum collection and the demographic characteristics of the study groups. Indeed, the two groups did not differ in age, gender, or body mass index. Furthermore, we specifically selected snoring children who fulfilled the currently accepted criteria for surgical removal of tonsils and adenoids and compared them with children who, despite having habitual snoring and being referred for evaluation by their primary care physicians, would not be viewed as requiring any therapeutic intervention based on their polysomnographic findings. We believe that this approach is more realistic and appropriate in the usual clinical contextual setting than using asymptomatic, nonsnoring controls. Therefore, the current findings should be highly relevant to the identification of snoring children who have sleep-disordered breathing and who require more extensive evaluation and treatment. Finally, the software-driven approach taken for tentative identification of the proteins corresponding to the peaks associated with predictive value in OSA is clearly only an initial step in such efforts and will require more extensive affinity-based column purification of large sample volumes of pooled serum samples followed by tandem mass spectrometry (29).

The analytical algorithms used to detect selective patterns of serum protein expression were capable of reliably differentiating between OSA and HS while using a restricted number of spectral peaks. Obviously, verification of the validity of such approach will require prospective and unbiased testing of a large cohort of snoring children with and without the diagnosis of sleep-disordered breathing in several pediatric sleep centers. Such study is clearly beyond the scope of the current work. However, our current findings confirm the initial hypothesis that OSA, possibly via altered gas exchange and sleep fragmentation, leads to alteration of a selective group of proteins in the morning serum and that such proteins can then be potentially used as a diagnostic biomarker for the disease. We have previously shown that serum levels of vascular endothelial growth factor are increased in pediatric patients with sleep apnea and that the magnitude of such increase correlates with disease severity (30). However, use of this single protein as a biomarker was ineffective, with no improvement in the likelihood ratios of diagnosing OSA compared with history and physical examination alone (30).

Of the three proteins identified in our analysis, we further analyzed the putative and clearly visible biomarker discovered at m/z 5896 using the Swiss-Prot database. This approach, which constitutes a preliminary and tentative biodiscovery exercise, suggested that a likely identity of this OSA-regulated spectrum may correspond to osteocalcin. Osteocalcin is a precursor of gamma-carboxyglutamic acid–containing protein and is also known as bone Gla protein. This protein is an important marker of bone turnover in physiologic and pathologic conditions (31) and has been widely studied as a biomarker for bone loss, growth retardation (32), osteosarcoma (33), and renal osteodystrophy (34). Previous studies have shown increased serum osteocalcin in diseases with increased bone turnover, e.g. renal osteodystrophy, hyperparathyroidism, hyperthyroidism, and Paget's disease (35,36) and decreased concentrations with low bone turnover, e.g. hypoparathyroidism, hypercalcemia resulting from bone metastases, and long-term corticosteroid therapy, the latter reflecting a decrease in the osteoblastic activity (37). While the role of osteocalcin changes in children with sleep-disordered breathing remains to be established, Colle and colleagues (38) identified increased nocturnal osteocalcin levels among children with growth retardation, possibly as a compensatory response. There is now a substantial body of evidence supporting a causal relationship between stunted somatic growth and OSA in children. Indeed, growth retardation is a frequent observation in children with OSA, even when they are obese (39) and has been attributed to increased energy expenditure during sleep (40,41) as well as to alterations in the regulation of insulin growth factor and its binding proteins (42). In the present study, we also observed that osteocalcin was consistently increased in serum of OSA patients, and this increase could reflect a compensatory phenomenon to the growth deceleration imposed by the episodic asphyxic events associated with recurrent upper airway obstruction. Of note, use of alternative search strategies for the three putative candidate biomarker peaks yielded several potential proteins whose function or expression appears to be regulated by stress. Examples of such candidates include corticotropin, lipotropin, and melanotropin. Obviously, extensive alternative techniques such as LC-MS-MS approaches and greatly expanded number of subjects will be needed to definitively identify these proteins as disease-related biomarkers and their roles in OSA.

In conclusion, proteomic profiling of serum samples in children with OSA revealed differential expression of circulating proteins that may provide useful future diagnostic approaches. Indeed, while prospective, large-scale studies will be required to confirm whether the currently discovered proteomic pattern can dependably differentiate between HS and OSA, such an approach coupled with definitive identification of the differentially expressed proteins will provide the opportunity for developing clinically applicable antibody-based diagnostic assays in pediatric OSA.