Skip to main content
Log in

Abstract

This article reviews various models for both discrete-time and continuous-time closed capture-recapture experiments. The traditional discrete-time models assume that the samples are independent. Dependence may be caused by local dependence (list dependence) within each animal or by heterogeneity among animals. Three different approaches that can incorporate dependence into models are reviewed, i.e., ecological models, log-linear models, and the sample-coverage approach. The statistical tools involved in population size estimation in these three approaches cover a wide range of methodologies. There has been relatively little published research for the continuous-time counterparts. The counting process approach, which is the framework for most existing estimation procedures for continuous-time models, is reviewed. The connection of continuous-time models to recurrent event analysis in the context of failure time inferences is discussed. The applications of capture-recapture models to other disciplines are briefly presented. Remarks about the limitations of the models are made and some future research directions are also suggested.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agresti, A. (1994), “Simple Capture-Recapture Models Permitting Unequal Catchability and Variable Sampling Effort,” Biometrics, 50, 494–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, H. M., Slade, N. A., and Kettle, W. D. (1997), “Application of Mark-Recapture Models to Estimation of the Population Size of Plants,” Ecology, 78, 1230–1237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alho, J. M. (1990), “Logistic Regression in Capture-Recapture Models,” Biometrics, 46, 623–635.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, P. K., Borgan, Ø., Gill, R. D., and Keiding, N. (1993), Statistical Models Based on Counting Processes, New York: Springer-Verlag.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Barker, R. J. (1997), “Joint Modelling of Live-Recapture, Tag-Resight and Tag-Recovery Data,” Biometrics, 53, 666–677.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, N. G. (1984), “Estimating Population Size From Capture-Recapture Experiments in Continuous Time,” Australian Journal of Statistics, 26, 1–7.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, N. G., and Heyde, C. C. (1990), “Estimating Population Size From Multiple Recapture Experiments,” Stochastic Processes and Their Applications, 36, 77–83.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Borchers, D. L., Zucchini, W., and Fewster, R. M. (1998), “Mark-Recapture Models for Line Transect Surveys,” Biometrics, 54, 1207–1220.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Boulinier, T., Nichols, J. D., Sauer, J. R., Hines, J. E., and Pollock, K. H. (1998), “Estimating Species Richness: The Importance of Heterogeneity in Species Detectability,” Ecology, 79, 1018–1028.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckland, S. T., Burnham, K. P., and Augustin, N. H. (1997), “Model Selection: An Integral Part of Inference,” Biometrics, 53, 603–618.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Buckland, S. T., and Garthwaite, P. H. (1991), “Quantifying Precision of Mark-Recapture Estimates Using the Bootstrap and Related Methods,” Biometrics, 47, 255–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunge, J., and Fitzpatrick, M. (1993), “Estimating the Number of Species: A Review,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 88, 364–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnham, K. P., and Anderson, D. R. (1998), Model Selection and Inference: A Practical Information Theoretic Approach. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Burnham, K. P., and Overton, W. S. (1978), “Estimation of the Size of a Closed Population When Capture Probabilities Vary Among Animals,” Biometrika, 65, 625–633.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Castledine, B. J. (1981), “A Bayesian Analysis of Multiple-Recapture Sampling for a Closed Population,” Biometrika, 67, 197–210.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Chao, A. (1998), “Capture-Recapture,” in Encyclopedia of Biostatistics, eds. P. Armitage and T. Colton, New York: Wiley, pp. 482–486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chao, A., Chu, W., and Hsu, C.-H. (2000), “Capture-Recapture When Time and Behavioral Response Affect Capture Probabilities,” Biometrics, 56, 427–433.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chao, A., and Lee, S.-M. (1993), “Estimating Population Size for Continuous-Time Capture-Recapture Models via Sample Coverage,” Biometrical Journal, 35, 29–45.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Chao, A., and Tsay, P. K. (1998), “A Sample Coverage Approach to Multiple-System Estimation With Application to Census Undercount,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 93, 283–293.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Chao, A., Tsay, P. K., Shau, W.-Y., and Chao, D.-Y. (1996), “Population Size Estimation for Capture-Recapture Models With Applications to Epidemiological Data,” Proceedings of the American Statistical Association, Biometrics Section, 108–117.

  • Chao, A., Tsay, P. K., Shau, W.-Y., and Chao, D.-Y. (2001a), “Tutorial in Biostatistics: The Applications of Capture-Recapture Models to Epidemiological Data,” Statistics in Medicine (in press).

  • Chao, A., Yip, P., Lee, S.-M., and Chu, W. (2001b), “Population Size Estimation Based on Estimating Functions for Closed Capture-Recapture Models,” Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 92, 213–232.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Colwell, R. K., and Coddington, J. A. (1994), “Estimating Terrestrial Biodiversity Through Extrapolation,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, Series B, 345, 101–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cormack, R. M. (1989), “Loglinear Models for Capture-Recapture,” Biometrics, 45, 395–413.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cormack, R. M., and Buckland, S. T. (1997), “Capture and Recapture (Update), in Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences (Update vol. 1), eds. S. Kotz, C. B. Read, and D. L. Banks, New York: Wiley, pp. 79–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coull, B. A., and Agresti, A. (1999), “The Use of Mixed Logit Models to Reflect Heterogeneity in Capture-Recapture Studies,” Biometrics, 55, 294–301.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, D. R. (1972), “Regression Models and Life Tables (With Discussion),” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 34, 187–220.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Craig, C. C. (1953), “On the Utilization of Marked Specimens in Estimating Populations of Flying Insects,” Biometrika, 40, 170–176.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Darroch, J. N. (1958), “The Multiple-Recapture Census. I. Estimation of a Closed Population,” Biometrika, 45, 343–359.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Darroch, J. N., Fienberg, S. E., Glonek, G. F. V., and Junker, B. W. (1993), “A Three-Sample Multiple-Recapture Approach to Census Population Estimation With Heterogeneous Catchability,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 88, 1137–1148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Efron, B., and Tibshirani, R. J. (1993), An Introduction to the Bootstrap, New York: Chapman and Hall.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, M. A., Bonett, D. G., and McDonald, L. L. (1994), “A General Theory for Modeling Capture-Recapture Data From a Closed Population,” Biometrics, 50, 396–405.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Fienberg, S. E. (1972), “The Multiple Recapture Census for Closed Populations and Incomplete 2k Contingency Tables,” Biometrika, 59, 591–603.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • — (1992), “An Adjusted Census in 1990? The Trial,” Chance, 5, 28–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, E. I., and Robert, C. P. (1992), “Capture-Recapture Estimation via Gibbs Sampling,” Biometrika, 79, 677–683.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hook, E. B., and Regal, R. R. (1995), “Capture-Recapture Methods in Epidemiology: Methods and Limitations,” Epidemiological Reviews, 17, 243–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huggins, R. M. (1989), “On the Statistical Analysis of Capture Experiments,” Biometrika, 76, 133–140.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • — (1991), “Some Practical Aspects of a Conditional Likelihood Approach to Capture Experiments,” Biometrics, 47, 725–732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huggins, R. M., and Yip, P. S. F. (1999), “Estimation of the Size of an Open Population From Capture-Recapture Data Using Weighted Martingale Methods,” Biometrics, 55, 387–395.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • International Working Group for Disease Monitoring and Forecasting (IWGDMF) (1995a), “Capture-Recapture and Multiple-Record Systems Estimation. I: History and Theoretical Development,” American Journal of Epidemiology, 142, 1047–1058.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1995b), “Capture-Recapture and Multiple-Record Systems Estimation. II: Applications in Human Diseases,” American Journal of Epidemiology, 142, 1059–1068.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaPorte, R. E., McCarty, D. J., Tull, E. S., and Tajima, N. (1992), “Counting Birds, Bees and NCDs,” Lancet, 339, 494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawless, F., and Thiagarajah, K. (1996), “A Point-Process Model Incorporating Renewals and Time Trends, With Application to Repairable Systems,” Technometrics, 38, 131–138.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S.-M. (1996), “Estimating Population Size for Capture-Recapture Data When Capture Probabilities Vary by Time, Behavior and Individual Animal,” Communications in Statistics—Simulation and Computation, 25, 431–457.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S.-M., and Chao, A. (1994), “Estimating Population Size via Sample Coverage for Closed Capture-Recapture Models,” Biometrics, 50, 88–97.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S.-M., and Chen, C. W. S. (1998), “Bayesian Inference of Population Size for Behavioral Response Models,” Statistica Sinica, 8, 1233–1247.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, D. Y., and Yip, P. (1999), “Parametric Regression Models for Continuous Time Removal and Recapture Studies,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 61, 401–411.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, C. J. (1994), “Efficiency of Martingale Methods in Recapture Studies,” Biometrika, 81, 305–315.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, C. J., and Yip, P. (1991), “A Unification of Inference for Capture-Recapture Studies Through Martingale Estimating Functions,” in Estimating Equations, ed. V.P. Godambe, Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 65–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manly, B. F. J., and McDonald, L. L. (1996), “Sampling Wildlife Populations,” Chance, 9, 9–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manly, B. F. J., McDonald, L. L., and Garner, G. W. (1996), “Maximum Likelihood Estimation for the Double-Count Method With Independent Observers,” Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, 2, 170–189.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Nayak, T. K. (1988), “Estimating Population Size by Recapture Sampling,” Biometrika, 75, 113–120.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Norris, J. L., and Pollock, K. H. (1995), “Capture-Recapture Model With Heterogeneity and Behavioural Response,” Environmental and Ecological Statistics, 2, 305–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — (1996a), “Including Model Uncertainty in Estimating Variances in Multiple Capture Studies,” Environmental and Ecological Statistics, 3, 235–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — (1996b), “Nonparametric MLE Under Two Closed Capture-Recapture Models With Heterogeneity,” Biometrics, 52, 639–649.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Otis, D. L., Burnham, K. P., White, G. C., and Anderson, D. R. (1978), “Statistical Inference From Capture Data on Closed Animal Populations,” Wildlife Monographs, 62, 1–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pledger, S. (2000), “Unified Maximum Likelihood Estimates for Closed Capture-Recapture Models Using Mixtures,” Biometrics, 56, 434–442.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, K. H. (1982), “A Capture-Recapture Design Robust to Unequal Probability of Capture,” Journal of Wildlife Management, 46, 752–757.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — (1991), “Modeling Capture, Recapture, and Removal Statistics for Estimation of Demographic Parameters for Fish and Wildlife Populations: Past, Present, and Future,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 86, 225–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, K. H., Hines, J. E., and Nichols, J. D. (1984), “The Use of Auxiliary Variables in Capture-Recapture and Removal Experiments,” Biometrics, 40, 329–340.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, K. H., and Otto, M. C. (1983), “Robust Estimation of Population Size in Closed Animal Populations From Capture-Recapture Experiments,” Biometrics, 39, 1035–1049.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rexstad, E., and Burnham, K. P. (1991), User’s Guide for Interactive Program CAPTURE, Fort Collins, CO: Colorado Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanathanan, L. (1972), “Models and Estimation Methods in Visual Scanning Experiments,” Technometrics, 14, 813–829.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Schnabel, Z. E. (1938), “The Estimation of the Total Fish Population of a Lake,” American Mathematical Monthly, 45, 348–352.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, C. J., and Seber, G. A. F. (1999), “A Review of Estimating Animal Abundance III,” Statistical Science, 14, 427–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seber, G. A. F. (1982), The Estimation of Animal Abundance (2nd ed.), London: Griffin.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1986), “A Review of Estimating Animal Abundance,” Biometrics, 42, 267–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — (1992), “A Review of Estimating Animal Abundance II,” International Statistical Review, 60, 129–166.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Skalski, J. R., and Robson, D. S. (1982), “A Mark and Removal Field Procedure for Estimating Population Abundance,” Journal of Wildlife Management, 46, 741–751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E. P., and van Belle, G. (1984), “Nonparametric Estimation of Species Richness,” Biometrics, 40, 119–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. J. (1988), “Bayesian Methods for Multiple Capture-Recapture Surveys,” Biometrics, 44, 1177–1189.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • — (1991), “Bayesian Analyses for a Multiple Capture-Recapture Model,” Biometrika, 78, 399–407.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, T. R., and Burnham, K. P. (1998), “Estimator Selection for Closed-Population Capture-Recapture,” Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, 3, 131–150.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Tsay, P. K., and Chao, A. (2001), “Population Size Estimation for Capture-Recapture Models With Applications to Epidemiological Data,” Journal of Applied Statistics, 28, 25–36.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Voas, J. M., and McGraw, G. (1997), Software Fault Injection: Inoculating Programs Against Errors. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei, L. J., and Glidden, D. V. (1997), “An Overview of Statistical Methods for Multiple Failure Time Data in Clinical Trials,” Statistics in Medicine, 16, 833–839.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, G. C., Anderson, D. R., Burnham, K. P., and Otis, D. L. (1982), Capture-Recapture and Removal Methods for Sampling Closed Populations, Report LA-8787-NERP, Los Alamos, NM: Los Alamos National Lab.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, G. C., and Burnham, K. P. (1999), “Program MARK: Survival Estimation From Populations of Marked Animals,” Bird Study, 46 (supplement), 120–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, K. R., and Anderson, D. R. (1995), “Continuous-Time Capture-Recapture Population Estimation When Capture Probability Varies Over Time,” Environmental and Ecological Statistics, 2, 55–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, R. M., and Collins, M. F. (1992), “Capture-Recapture Estimation With Samples of Size One Using Frequency Data,” Biometrika, 79, 543–553.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Yip, P. (1991), “A Martingale Estimating Equation for a Capture-Recapture Experiment in Discrete Time,” Biometrics, 47, 1081–1088.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • — (1995), “Estimating the Number of Errors in a System Using a Martingale Approach,” IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 44, 322–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yip, P., and Chao, A. (1996), “Estimating Population Size From Capture-Recapture Studies via Sample Coverage and Estimating Functions,” Communications in Statistics—Stochastic Models, 12, 17–35.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Yip, P., Fong, D. Y. T., and Wilson, K. (1993), “Estimating Population Size by Recapture Sampling via Estimating Function,” Communications in Statistics—Stochastic Models, 9, 179–193.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Yip, P., Huggins, R. M., and Lin, D. Y. (1996), “Inference for Capture-Recapture Experiments in Continuous Time With Variable Capture Rates,” Biometrika, 83, 477–483.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Yip, P., Xi, L., Chao, A., and Hwang, W.-H. (2000), “Estimating the Population Size With a Behavioral Response in Capture-Recapture Experiments,” Environmental and Ecological Statistics, 7, 405–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaslavsky, A. M., and Wolfgang, G. S. (1993), “Triple-System Modeling of Census, Post-Enumeration Survey, and Administrative-List Data,” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 11, 279–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zippin, C. (1956), “An Evaluation of the Removal Method of Estimating Animal Populations,” Biometrics, 12, 163–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anne Chao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chao, A. An overview of closed capture-recapture models. JABES 6, 158–175 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1198/108571101750524670

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1198/108571101750524670

Key Words

Navigation