Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T17:23:47.540Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Scull's Dilemma

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2018

Kathleen Jones*
Affiliation:
University of York, Heslington, York YO1 5DD

Extract

Few psychiatrists now take a lively interest in the social sciences, and few social scientists listen to what psychiatrists have to say. For the handful who do, the widening gap between the two fields of knowledge is regrettable, for we have much to learn from each other. The gap seems to have grown for two reasons: psychiatrists, increasingly occupied with pharmacotherapy, have drawn closer to general medicine, and there is comparatively little interest in the social therapies which seemed to offer so much promise back in the 1950s. The open-door system was a success, and so was the idea of community care, even if the practice left much to be desired. Incidentally, these developments destroyed many of the interesting experiments in group dynamics which were at one time a feature of mental hospital life. Social workers, once seen as allies, went off on their own in the new, powerful and largely incomprehensible Social Services Departments, where they had many other tasks to occupy them. Sociologists became shrill and hostile. Many psychiatrists ceased to read sociology after the publication of Goffman's Asylums (Goffman, 1961) because it seemed that sociology was off on some kind of egotrip which was deeply antithetical to their own professional experience. People who talked about “madness” instead of “mental illness”, rejected diagnosis as labelling, and regarded mental patients as victims of a capitalist plot were (and are) difficult to talk to. One of the distinguishing features of mental health reform over the past 200 years has been its apolitical nature—people of all political views could agree on what seemed essentially a matter of common humanity. Suddenly it became highly politicized, both in theoretical terms, since the new analysis was basically neo-Marxist, and in the action of pressure groups in the Civil Liberties lobby. Confused by the Right to Treatment, the Right to Refuse Treatment, the Right to Information and the Right to Confidentiality, most psychiatrists have (wisely in the circumstances) kept their heads down and got on with the job.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1982 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Clare, A. H. (1980) Correspondence in Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, vol 73, January 1980, p 640.Google Scholar
DHSS (1975) Better Services for the Mentally Ill, Cmnd 6233, HMSO.Google Scholar
Flew, A. (1973) Crime or Disease? London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1961) Folie et déraison: histoire de la folie à l'àge classique, Plon, Paris. Translated by Richard Howard as Madness and Civilisation, New York, Pantheon, 1965.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1975) Surveiller et Punir, Gallimard, Paris. Translated by Alan Sheridan (1977) as Discipline and Punish, Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1961) Asylums, New York: Anchor Books, Doubleday.Google Scholar
Jones, K. (1955) Lunacy, Law and Conscience, 1744–1845. Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Jones, K. (1960) Mental Health and Social Policy, 1845–1959. Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Jones, K. (1965) The Development of Institutional Care. In New Thinking about Institutional Care. Association of Social Workers Conference Report.Google Scholar
Jones, K. (1972) A History of the Mental Health Services. Routledge and Kegan Paul, pp 54–5, 127–9, 256, 349 (financial stringency) and 327–30 (social control).Google Scholar
Jones, K. (1979) Integration or Disintegration in the Mental Health Services. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 72, 640–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, K. (1980) Correspondence in Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 73, 152.Google Scholar
Kennedy, I. (1981) The Unmasking of Medicine. Based on the Reith Lectures, 1980. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Parliamentary Debates (1954) Reply to Debate by the Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Health (Miss Patricia Hornsby-Smith) February 19, 1954, vol 523, col 2371.Google Scholar
Pearson, G. (1975) The Deviant Imagination. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Scull, A. (1973a) Decarceration: community treatment and the deviant—a radical view, p 1. Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Scull, A. (1973b) op. cit. p 97.Google Scholar
Scull, A. (1973c) op. cit. p 3.Google Scholar
Scull, A. (1973d) op. cit. pp 411.Google Scholar
Scull, A. (1973c) op. cit. p 2.Google Scholar
Scull, A. (1973f) ibid. Google Scholar
Scull, A. (1973g) op. cit pp 50–3.Google Scholar
Scull, A. (1973h) op. cit. pp 135 et seq. Google Scholar
Scull, A. (1979a) Museums of Madness: the social organisation of insanity in 19th century England, p 100. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Scull, A. (1979b) op. cit. p 261 Google Scholar
Scull, A. (1979c) op. cit. p 257.Google Scholar
Scull, A. (1979d) op. cit. p 14.Google Scholar
Scull, A. (1979e) op. cit p 33.Google Scholar
Scull, A. (1979f) op. cit pp 256–7.Google Scholar
Sheridan, A. (1980a) Michel Foucault: The Will to Truth, pp 200–4. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
Sheridan, A. (1980b) op. cit. p. 16.Google Scholar
Skultans, V. (1979) English Madness: Ideas on Insanity, 1580–1890, pp 116–27. Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Wildavsky, A. B. (1980a) The Art and Craft of Policy Analysis, p 51 et seq. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Wildavsky, A. B. (1980b) op. cit. p 48.Google Scholar
Wildavsky, A. B. (1980c) op. cit. p 53 et seq. Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.