Lateral lymph node metastasis in a patient with T1 upper rectal cancer treated by lateral lymph node dissection: a case report and brief literature review

Background Lateral lymph node (LLN) metastasis may occur in patients with advanced rectal cancers of which the lower margins are located at or below the peritoneal reflection. However, LLN metastasis from a T1 rectal cancer is rare. Here, we report a case of LLN metastasis from a T1 upper rectal cancer that was successfully treated by sequential LLN dissection. Case presentation A 56-year-old man was referred to our hospital for the treatment of a T1 upper rectal cancer. We performed a laparoscopic low anterior resection. Histological examination showed a moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma with submucosal layer invasion; the invasion depth was classified as head invasion, without vessel or lymph duct invasion. Tumor budding was classified as grade 1. A total of six lymph nodes were harvested, and no lymph node metastases were detected. The postoperative course was uneventful. At 6 months after surgery, however, the serum carcinoembryonic antigen levels were elevated, and abdominal computed tomography (CT) revealed swollen lymph nodes in the right internal and common iliac artery area. Positron emission tomography with CT revealed hot spots in the same lesions. A retrospective re-evaluation of the preoperative CT images revealed no apparent swollen lymph nodes; however, an unusual soft tissue area was detected around the right internal iliac artery. A right LLN dissection was performed. Fifteen lymph nodes were resected, and histologically, metastases of adenocarcinoma were identified in 3 nodes. The postoperative course was again uneventful. The patient was given 12 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy with FOLFOX (fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin). The patient remains healthy and with no signs of recurrence at 30 months after the second surgery. Conclusions LLN metastasis occurs very rarely in patients with T1 upper rectal cancer and no risk factors for lymph node metastasis; however, a careful perioperative examination of the LLN should be performed. In cases involving LLN metastasis, a LLN dissection may be a therapeutic option if performed with curative intent.

Here, we report a case of LLN metastasis from a T1 upper rectal cancer that was successfully treated by sequential LLN dissection.

Case presentation
A 56-year-old man was referred to our hospital for the treatment of rectal cancer. The patient was otherwise healthy, without significant previous or current medical problems. His serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 levels were 1.8 ng/mL (normal, <3.4 ng/mL) and 7.7 U/mL (normal, <37 U/mL), respectively. Colonoscopy revealed a pedunculated-type tumor measuring 1.5 cm × 1.0 cm in the upper rectum, 12 cm from the anal verge, and proctographic examination revealed a filling defect in the upper rectum (Fig. 1a, b). Contrastenhanced computed tomography (CT) revealed no swollen lymph nodes or distant metastases. We diagnosed the rectal cancer as T1N0M0 stage I and performed a laparoscopic low anterior resection. Regarding the extent of lymph node dissection, a division of the superior rectal artery root was performed without LLN dissection. A histological examination revealed a moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma that had invaded the submucosal layer (T1); the invasion depth was classified as a head invasion, without vessel or lymph duct invasion (Fig. 2a-c). Tumor budding was classified as grade 1. A total of six lymph nodes were harvested, and no lymph node metastases were detected. The postoperative course was uneventful.
Six months after the operation, however, the patient's serum CEA levels increased to 7.0 ng/mL. Abdominal CT revealed swollen lymph nodes in the right common and internal iliac artery area (Fig. 3a, b). Positron emission tomography (PET) with CT revealed hot spots (SUV max , 5.3) in the same lesions (Fig. 4a, b). No other metastases were observed. Accordingly, we retrospectively re-evaluated the preoperative CT images. Although we detected no apparent swollen lymph nodes, we observed an unusual soft tissue area around the right internal iliac artery (Fig. 5). The preoperative diagnosis was an LLN metastasis localized in the right pelvic area, and an open unilateral LLN dissection of the right common iliac, internal iliac, and obturator nodes was performed. The branches of the right internal iliac vessels, including the superior vesical and obturator vessels, were ligated and divided at their origins with resected lymph nodes; however, the internal iliac artery and pelvic nerve plexus were preserved. Histologically, 15 lymph nodes were resected; of these, 3 (2 in the proximal internal iliac node and 1 in the common iliac node) contained metastases of adenocarcinoma (Fig. 2d). The postoperative course was uneventful. The patient was given 12 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy with FOLFOX (fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin). He remains healthy without signs of recurrence at 30 months after the second surgery.

Discussion
The course of the patient described in this report suggests two important clinical issues. First, LLN metastasis can occur in a patient with T1 upper rectal cancer and no risk factors for lymph node metastasis; second, sequential LLN dissection is useful for the treatment of this condition.
With regard to the first point, LLN metastasis occurs in 7.7-28.8% of patients with T3-T4 lower rectal cancer [4]. In contrast, the reported incidence of LLN metastasis among patients with T1 lower rectal cancer is only  Histological examination showed a moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma that had invaded the submucosal layer; the invasion depth was classified as a head invasion (a). Immunohistochemical staining for CD34 (b) and D2-40 (c) revealed no infiltration of the vessels or lymph ducts. d The resected lateral lymph nodes confirmed a metastasis of moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma 0.9% [4]. To date, only four cases of isolated LLN metastasis from a lower rectal cancer have been reported [7][8][9][10], and to our knowledge, ours is the first case of LLN metastasis in a patient with T1 upper rectal cancer. The incidence of lymph node metastasis from a T1 colorectal cancer is approximately 15% [3]. Additional major surgery is recommended after a successful endoscopic excision if the tumor has at least one risk factor for lymph node metastasis, including an invasion depth ≥1000 μm from the muscularis mucosa, lymphatic and vascular invasion, non-well or moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma, and high-grade budding [3]. Table 1 presents a review of the five reported cases (including this case) of isolated LLN metastasis from T1 rectal cancer. Three of the five cases had risk factors for lymph node metastasis [8][9][10]; in contrast, our case had no identified risk factors and involved a pedunculated-type tumor with head invasion that could be managed by endoscopic treatment alone [11].
In general, enhanced CT is used as a preoperative imaging tool for rectal cancer. Currently, the European Society for Medical Oncology guidelines recommend pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the initial staging of rectal cancer because this modality is highly accurate for determining localization, clinical T and N stages, and potential circumferential resection margins [1]. The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of MRI for lymph node metastasis are 77 and 71%, respectively [12]. Additionally, the usefulness of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI)-MRI has recently been reported [13][14][15]. The accuracy of DWI-MRI is better than that of both CT and 18 FDG-PET (86.6 vs. 76.0% and 78.3 vs. 69.9%, respectively) [14,15]. In our case, we considered the patient to be metastasis-negative, based on enhanced CT findings. The LLN metastasis was revealed only 6 months after the initial surgery, when an unusual soft tissue area around the right internal iliac artery was retrospectively detected on preoperative CT images. Based on these two factors, it is possible that the LLN metastasis existed at the time of initial surgery and could have been diagnosed by DWI-MRI.
With regard to the second point about the therapeutic usefulness of sequential LLN dissection, the status of the LLN has not been fully established. In Japan, LLN metastasis is considered a local disease [16], and prophylactic LLN dissection is recommended [3]. This type of dissection does not appear to increase morbidity, mortality, or sexual dysfunction [17,18]. In Western countries, LLN is categorized as a distant metastasis, and preoperative chemoradiotherapy, rather than prophylactic LLN dissection, has been administered to patients with advanced rectal cancers [l, 2]. However, therapeutic LLN dissection is recommended at the time of primary tumor resection for cases with clinically evident LLN metastasis, assuming that curative resection can be achieved [19]. Extended LLN dissection is recommended due to favorable oncologic outcomes in this situation [6,7]. Table 2 lists the treatments and outcomes of the five cases of isolated LLN metastasis from T1 rectal cancer. In four cases, extended LLN dissection was performed [7][8][9][10]. We disagree with the LLN dissection with skeletonizing of the branches of the internal iliac vessels; however, we think a routine en bloc resection of the internal iliac vessels is not necessary when the metastatic tumors do not invade or adhere firmly to the internal iliac vessels because there is the possibility of increasing the risk of complications. In our case, the internal iliac vessels   [20]; however, in all four cases, the patients with isolated LLN metastases from early rectal cancers were treated successfully via unilateral LLN dissection in the affected side [7][8][9][10]. With regard to adjuvant chemotherapy, two patients refused chemotherapy after LLN dissection [7,9]. Authors' contributions HT, MK, TT, SI, and TH performed the surgery, YH diagnosed the pathology, and TH approved the final manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Consent for publication
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and any accompanying images.