Skip to main content
Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture
Download PDF
Download ePub

Evaluation of the fermentation performance and functional properties of bacterial communities of amaranth silage supplemented with Limosilactobacillus fermentum and Latilactobacillus graminis

Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture volume 10, Article number: 103 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The objective was to determine the effects of different lactic acid bacteria (LAB) on amaranth (Amaranthus hypochondriaus) silage fermentation characteristics, changes in bacterial communities and their functional properties, and to investigate the preferential effects and mechanisms of action of Limosilactobacillus fermentum (L. fermentum) and Latilactobacillus graminis (L. graminis) on the bacterial communities of silage. LAB were screened and identified from native grasses and its naturally fermented silage, and their effects on fermentation performance and bacterial community of amaranth after 60 days of fermentation were investigated. BL1 and BL5 strains were identified as L. fermentum and L. graminis, respectively. They could grow normally at concentrations of 3.0% and 6.5% NaCl, tolerating pH and temperature ranges of 3.5 –9.0 and 4.0 – 9.0, 30 – 45 ℃ and 10 – 45 ℃, respectively. The distilled water, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum (commercial inoculant), L. fermentum, and L. graminis were inoculated into amaranth at a total of 1 × 105 cfu/g fresh material and labeled AhSCK, AhSLP, AhSLF, and AhSLG, respectively, while the fresh amaranth was labeled YLS.

Results

As expected, the water soluble carbohydrates of AhSCK was lower than AhSLG (p < 0.05). The highest number of LAB was found in AhSLF (p < 0.05). The lactic acid (LA) content of AhSLP was significantly higher (p < 0.05) than other silage. Nevertheless, acetic acid (AA) content of AhSLF was significantly different from other silage (p < 0.05). All the amaranth silage was well preserved with low pH (4.16 – 4.51) and acceptable levels of butyric acid (0.00 – 0.86%FM). At the species level, Pantoea agglomerans, Pseudomonas oryzihabitans, and Cenchrus americanus served as the dominant strains in fresh amaranth, with relative abundances lower than 1% after ensiling.. Lentilactobacillus buchneri, Levilactobacillus brevis, and L. fermentum were the dominant strains of AhSCK, AhSLP and AhSLF. Nevertheless, the predominant strains of AhSLG was Xanthomonas oryzae. Both fresh material and silage, L. fermentum, L. plantarum, Levilactobacillus brevis, Pantoea agglomerans, Pseudomonas oryzihabitans, Cenchrus americanus, Pseudomonas coleopterorum, Priestia aryabhattai, and Exiguobacterium sibiricum were significantly different in relative abundance (p < 0.01).Functional prediction analysis showed that in pyruvate metabolism, glycolysis/gluconeogenesis and amino sugar and nucleotide sugar metabolism were enriched after ensiling. AhSLF showed the most obvious trend of increasing abundance of pentose phosphate pathway, biosynthesis of secondary metabolites and biosynthesis of antibiotics, while the abundance of metabolic pathways decreased significantly (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

L. fermentum can be recommended as an additive to improve the quality of amaranth silage, as it regulates the epiphytic microbiota in silage, improving the fermentation quality and metabolic capacity of the bacterial community.

Graphical Abstract

Background

Recently, the rapid development of China's livestock industry has caused problems such as feed shortages, climatic conditions in semi-arid and arid regions and water shortages that reduce the availability of feed. Consequently, the investigation of new, nutrient-rich and tolerant forage resources, including amaranth (Amaranthus hypochondriaus), has been initiated. Amaranth is an annual plant, which is suitable for poor soils and areas with infertile rainfall and high temperatures [1, 2]. It is a forage resource with ruminant feed potential [3]. Amaranth has a high growth rate and yield. It has good adaptability and plenty of protein, starch and fat [4, 5]. In the case of amaranth, the thickness of the stalk and moisture content may affect its drying rate, thus limiting its utilization as a hay forage [6, 7]. Ensiling has been applied successfully to preserve fresh amaranth [8, 9]. Amaranth silage preserves the freshness and juiciness, especially during the rainy seasons when it is difficult to produce hay.

The fermentation process of silage can be influenced by temperature, moisture, nutrient content and sugar content of the raw material, microbiome in the raw material and some human factors [10, 11]. In particular, the ecological diversity of microorganisms (epiphytic lactic acid bacteria (LAB)) is closely related to silage preservation [12]. When the fermentation substrate of the forage is insufficient to support LAB fermentation, the fermentation characteristics of the forage are generally enhanced by exogenous addition of silage additives [13]. Numerous additives are widely utilised for their characteristics of improving silage quality with small nutrient losses. Of these, LAB is appreciated for its properties of improving the quality of fermentation and extending the ensiling time of raw materials [10, 14]. LAB inoculants rapidly inhibit complex microorganisms in raw materials. Moreover, new silage inoculants can be isolated and identified from various materials [15]. However, amaranth has a low water-soluble carbohydrate (WSC) content and high moisture content, and natural fermentation may affect the final fermentation of silage. Therefore, the fermentation characteristics of amaranth were improved by adding LAB, which were classified as homofermentative and heterofermentative LAB. It also has been shown in previous studies that homofermentative LAB can use glucose to accelerate the fermentation process of lactic acid (LA) [16]. LA is produced via the Embden Meyerhof pathway (EMP) by strains such as L. plantarum, Pediococcus acidilactici, and Pediococcus pentosaceus, while heterotypic fermentative LAB are also widely used for the production of LA, acetic acid (AA), and ethanol, such as certain strains of Lactobacillus buchneri, Limosilactobacillus fermentum (L. fermentum) [17,18,19,20,21,22].

The diversity of strains implies that there are some variation in their effectiveness on silage, leading to the impossibility of a generic type of LAB production to modulate the fermentation characteristics of different forage silages [23, 24]. The fermentation process of silage can be considered as an ecosystem in which complex and dynamic interactions among microorganisms occur that can drive community structure and functional properties [12, 25]. In addition, there are important priority effects in microbial communities that have been shown to affect microbial community assemblages in various habitats [26,27,28]. Nevertheless, there are fewer studies on how priority effects affect the structural and functional properties of bacterial communities in amaranth silage inoculated with different LAB strains. Consequently, we hypothesised that L. fermentum and Latilactobacillus graminis (L. graminis) would have a positive effect on the fermentation characteristics, bacterial community structure and 16S rRNA gene-predicted metabolic characteristics of amaranth silage, and investigated the preferential effects and mechanisms of action on silage bacterial communities.

Methods

Lactic acid bacteria strains

Based on the method of Wang et al. [29], a total of 2 LAB strains were isolated from native grass and naturally fermented silage samples. Native grasses were harvested in July 2019 and 2020 (milk stage) in meadows, typical and desert steppe of the Inner Mongolian plateau in China. Samples (10 g) of the fresh and fermented material were aseptically mixed with 90 mL of sterile distilled water. Serial dilutions were spread to the de Man, Rugose, Sharpe (MRS) agar (Difco Laboratories, Detroit, MI, USA), and the plates were incubated at 35 ℃ for 2 days under anaerobic conditions for the isolation of LAB. Thereafter, the presumptive homo and heterofermentative LAB strains were purified third by streaking on MRS agar plates and stored at – 80 ℃ in MRS containing 25% glycerol [12].

Physiological and morphological tests

The assays for Gram staining, peroxidase activity and glucose gas production were referred to previous studies [30, 31]. Reference was made to Cai et al. [32] for temperature and acid resistance (pH adjustment with hydrochloric acid or NaOH) tests. Salt tolerance of the strains was determined with reference to the method of Wang et al. [33, 34], and its growth was measured and evaluated using optical density (OD) values. API 50 CH (BioMérieux, Marcy l' Etoile, Lyons, France) for the determination of carbohydrate assimilation [34].

Lactic acid bacteria identification by 16S rRNA sequencing

To extract the DNA of the screened strains, Bacterial DNA kit was used (Tiangen Biotech Co., Ltd., Beijing, China). The primers 27F (5′-AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG-3′) and 1492R (5′-TACGGCTACCTTGTTACGACT-3′) were used in the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) (Cai et al. 1999) [33]. The 16S rRNA sequences were identified using BLAST analysis on GenBank [35].

Experimental design and silage preparation

The test material was red-fruited amaranth, and it was planted on June 9, 2021. The test site was located at the forage trial base of Inner Mongolia Agricultural University (111°430 E, 40°480 N). Three 1-m2 plots were selected for harvesting (mature stage) on August 10. The collected red fruit amaranth was placed on a clean plastic sheet and dried until the moisture content reached about 70%. The raw material was cut into lengths of approximately 2–3 cm using a hand-held guillotine (Mode-8, 200; Minghong Business, Shandong, China). Strains BL1 and BL5, and commercial LAB additive (L. plantarum JYLP-002 was supplied by Shandong Zhongke Jiayi Biological Engineering Company) were used as inoculants. All LAB strains were supplemented separately at 1 × 105 cfu/g fresh material (FM). The control group (YLS) silage was sprayed with an equivalent deionized water. The amaranth (500 g) were packed in polyethylene plastic bags (size: 300 mm × 400 mm; Shenyang Huasheng Plastic Packaging Products Co., Ltd., Shenyang, China), which were then vacuum sealed (DZ400/2D vacuum sealer; Wenzhou Dafeng Machinery Co., Ltd. Wenzhou, China) and ensiled at ambient temperature (24–30 ℃) for 60 days. Chemical and fermentation characteristics, microbial populations, and microbial community of the control (AhSCK), L. plantarum (AhSLP), strain BL1 (AhSLF), and strain BL5 (AhSLG) silage were then measured.

Chemical and fermentation characteristics analysis

Each amaranth silage sample had six replicates. Dry matter (DM) content was measured following the method of Zhang et al. [36]. The crude protein (CP) content was measured according to the method of Patrica [37], utilizing on a Kjeldahl nitrogen tester (Gehart Vapodest 50 s, Germany). Determination of neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and acid detergent fiber (ADF) content was performed according to the method of Van et al. [38] by using the Ankom A2000i fiber analyzer (Ankom Technology, Macedon, NY, USA). The WSC content was measured following the method of Chen et al. [39].

A sample of silage (10 g) was mixed with 90 g deionized water following the description of Cai [40] and stored in a refrigerator at 4 ℃ for 24 h. The leachate was filtered through four layers of gauze and filter paper and the pH, ammonia nitrogen (NH3-N), and organic acids of the leachate were measured. pH was measured using a glass electrode pH meter (Leici pH S-3C, Shanghai, China). The content of LA, AA, propionic acid (PA) and butyric acid (BA) in silage was determined by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC; model: Waters e2695, Milford, USA) [26]. The method of Broderick and Kang [41] was used to determine ammoniacal nitrogen (NH3-N) concentrations. Microbial populations (LAB, yeasts, mold, anerobic bacteria, and coliform bacteria) in the FM were assessed as described in a previous report [42].

Microbial community analysis

The bacterial community composition of amaranth fermented for 60 days was analyzed by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Based on the investigation of Liu et al. [43], total DNA was extracted from fresh and silage samples of amaranth. The procedures of metagenomic DNA extraction and PCR amplification of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene were performed according to Guo et al. [44]. Briefly, DNA was amplified with primers 27F (5′-AGRGTTTGATYNTGGCTCAG-3′) and 1492R (5′-TASGGHTACCTTGTTASGACTT-3′). PCR conditions were an initial denaturation at 98 ℃ for 2 min, 30 cycles of denaturation at 98 ℃ for 30 s, annealing at 50 ℃ for 30 s, and elongation at 72 ℃ for 60 s, followed by a final extension at 72 ℃ for 5 min. The PCR products were purified for sequencing and analysis. Each treatment was performed in six copies. 16S rRNA gene sequence were stored in NCBI with BioProject accession number PRJNA911007.

NGS sequencing was performed by Biomarker Technologies (Beijing, China) on a Pacbio_SMRT platform (Pacbio Sequel II, CA, USA). Coverage of alpha-diversity indicators Chao1 and Good was calculated using QIIME v1.9.1 [45]. Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) was performed using the R program (version 3.2.5) on the basis of beta-diversity unweighted or weighted unifrac distances. The SILVA (version 128) 16S rRNA database was classified by Operational Taxonomic Units (OTUs) using the Ribosomal Database Project (RDP) classifier (version 2.2) with a minimum confidence of 0.7, and then classified by phylum, genus, and species. Mothur (version v.1.30) software was used to evaluate the alpha-diversity indices (ACE, Chao 1, Simpson, and Shannon) of the samples. LEfSe (Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) effect size) was able to find biomarkers that are statistically different between groups [46]. It was performed using a free online platform (https://international.biocloud.net). Phylogenetic Investigation of Communities by Reconstruction of Unobserved States II (PICRUSt2) software was used to predict microbial functions from the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) database.

Statistical analysis

One-way analyses of variance (ANOVA) based on SAS’ General Linear Model (GLM) program (version 9.3; SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, United States) were conducted on fermentation and nutritional characteristics and microbial counts of fresh and silage amaranth. Effects were considered significant when p < 0.05. The graphs of microbial community data were created using the BMK Cloud online platform and GraphPad prism 8.

Results

The selection of isolated lactic acid bacteria based on morphological and physiological tests

Table 1 shows the selection of isolated LAB based on morphological and physiological tests. Two isolated LAB strains were Gram-positive and catalase-negative. And both isolated strains were bacillus-like and gram-positive and peroxide-negative. The optimum growth temperature of strain BL1 was 30 – 45 ℃, and the pH could be reproduced normally in the range of 3.5 – 9.0. And strain BL5 was able to grow normally from 10 – 45 ℃, and the growth was well at pH 4.0 – 9.0. The growth of strain BL1 and BL5 was normal at the concentrations of 3.0% and 6.5% NaCl.

Table 1 The selection of isolated lactic acid bacteria on the base of the morphological and physiological tests
Full size table

Both strains possessed different fermentation patterns based on the results of gas detection on glucose, with strain BL1 being a hetero-fermented LAB and strain BL5 being a homo-fermented LAB, while different ferment carbohydrates are indicated in Table 2. GenBank database was used to analyze the similarity by BLAST in this study. Strain BL1 showed high similarity to L. fermentum (99.93%) and strain BL5 showed high similarity to L. graminis (99.65%). The nucleotide sequences of strains BL1 and BL5 were registered to Genbank under accession numbers OP984707 and OP984708, respectively (Table 3).

Table 2 The characteristics of isolated lactic acid bacteria on the base of carbohydrate fermentation
Full size table
Table 3 The results of isolated lactic acid bacteria on the base of 16S rRNA gene sequences
Full size table

Chemical and microbial composition of pre-ensiled amaranth

Table 4 shows the chemical composition and microbial population of the fresh amaranth. The DM content of the raw material was 32.03% of FW. CP, WSC, NDF, and ADF were all DM-based with 7.99%, 1.35%, 47.39% and 36.70%, respectively. The numbers of LAB, mold, yeast and Escherichia coli attached to the raw material were 3.90, 0.90, 5.26, 4.03, and 4.65 log10 cfu/g FM, correspondingly.

Table 4 Chemical composition and microbial population of amaranth prior to ensiling
Full size table

Chemical and fermentation characteristics, and microbial populations after 60 days of ensiling

The chemical composition, fermentation characteristics and microbial population of silage for 60 days are shown in Table 5. Compared to AhSCK, the additive-treated group showed a reduction in DM content and an increase in CP content (p > 0.05). NDF content was lower than AhSCK in all treatments except AhSLF (p > 0.05), but ADF content was significantly lower in AhSLF than AhSCK (p < 0.05). While the WSC content of AhSLG was significantly higher than AhSCK (p < 0.05), it was not significantly different from AhSLP and AhSLF (p > 0.05). The number of LAB was significantly increased compared to AhSCK (p < 0.05), with AhSLF having the highest number of LAB. The number of yeast and aerobic bacteria was reduced in the additive groups. After ensiling, no molds and Escherichia coli were detected in all treatments. All the amaranth silage was well preserved with low pH (4.16 – 4.51) and acceptable levels of BA (0.00 – 0.86%FM). And LA content of the additive treatments was significantly higher than AhSCK (p < 0.05). The AA content of AhSLF was significantly different from other silage, PA and NH3-N contents were not significantly different between treatments (p > 0.05). In particular, higher BA content was detected in AhSCK and AhSLG (p < 0.05).

Table 5 Chemical compositions, fermentation characteristics, and microbial populations on 60 days of ensiling
Full size table

Bacterial community of high-moisture amaranth silage

This study also analyzed the bacterial diversity in silage (Table 6). The sequencing coverage values for all samples demonstrated that the sequencing depth was sufficient to effectively characterize the bacterial community (coverage values > 99%). The various indices of alpha diversity in silage showed differences compared to the raw material. The OTUs, ACE and Chao1 were significantly (p < 0.05) increased for silage compared to YLS. The highest OTUs and Chao1 indexes were found for AhSLG and the highest ACE index for AhSLP among different silage. There was a significant difference in the Simpson index of AhSCK and AhSLF compared to YLS (p < 0.05). Both AhSLP and AhSLG had significantly higher Shannon indices than AhSCK and AhSLF (p < 0.05), with no significant difference with YLS (p > 0.05).

Table 6 Alpha-diversity of bacterial diversity of amaranth silage
Full size table

For the determination of whether there were differences in bacterial community structure in fresh amaranth and silage, PCoA was performed based on unweighted uniFrac distances (Fig. 1). Figure 1 showed a clear separation of bacterial communities in fresh material and silage. In addition, AhSCK, AhSLP, AhSLF and AhSLG were separated.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) of the bacterial community of fresh material and amaranth on 60 days of ensiling. YLS, fresh amaranth; AhSCK, control group; AhSLP, commercial inoculant group; AhSLF, strain BL1 group; AhSLG, strain BL5 group

Full size image

The relative abundance of bacterial communities in fresh material and 60-day silage is shown in Fig. 2. The dominant phylum of YLS were Proteobacteria and Firmicutes (Fig. 2A). After ensiling, the relative abundance of Firmicutes increased, the relative abundance of Proteobacteria decreased, but remained the dominant phylum for treatments with different inoculants. As shown in Fig. 2B, there was a highly significant difference in the relative abundance of Firmicutes and Proteobacteria between fresh materials and silage at the phylum level (p < 0.01). The relative abundance of Firmicutes of AhSLP, AhSLF and AhSLG was lower than AhSCK. Among them, the relative abundance of AhSLG was quite low (42.21%), and the relative abundance of Proteobacteria was as high as 52.30%.

Fig. 2
figure 2

The bacterial community of fresh material and amaranth on 60 days of ensiling. A The bacterial community was shown at the phylum level. B The extended error bar plot displaying the significant differences among groups at the phylum level. C The bacterial community was shown at the genus level. D The extended error bar plot displaying significant differences among groups at the genus level. E The bacterial community was shown at the genus level. F The extended error bar plot displaying significant differences among groups at the genus level. *Shows that the significant difference was at p < 0.05 level. **Shows that the significant difference was at p < 0.01 level. YLS, fresh amaranth; AhSCK, control group; AhSLP, commercial inoculant group; AhSLF, strain BL1 group; AhSLG, strain BL5 group

Full size image

Relative abundances of bacteria at the genus level are presented in Fig. 2C. The dominant genus of YLS were Pseudomonas, Pantoea, Paucibacter. For AhSCK, the dominant genus were Limosilactobacillus, Lactiplantibacillus, Lentilactobacillus. The dominant genus of AhSLP were Lactiplantibacillus, Levilactobacillus. The predominant genus of AhSLF were Limosilactobacillus, Lactiplantibacillus. For AhSLG, the dominant genus were Xanthomonas, Escherichia and Shigella. As indicated in Fig. 2D, there were significant or highly significant differences (p < 0.05 or p < 0.01) in the relative abundance of Limosilactobacillus, Lactiplantibacillus, Pseudomonas, Levilactobacillus, Pantoea, Paucibacter, Bacillus, Paenibacillus, Enterobacter, and Exiguobacterium for both fresh materials and silage at the genus level.

Relative abundances of bacteria at the species level are presented in Fig. 2E. The predominnant strains of YLS were Pantoea agglomerans, Pseudomonas oryzihabitans, Cenchrus americanus and Pseudomonas coleopterorum. The dominnant strains of AhSCK were L. plantarum and Lentilactobacillus buchneri. The dominant strains of AhSLP were Levilactobacillus brevis and L. plantarum. The dominant strains of AhSLF was L. fermentum. The predominnant strains of AhSLG were Xanthomonas oryzae and L. plantarum. As shown in Fig. 2F, both fresh material and silage, L. fermentum, L. plantarum, Levilactobacillus brevis, Pantoea agglomerans, Pseudomonas oryzihabitans, Cenchrus americanus, Pseudomonas coleopterorum, Priestia aryabhattai, Paenibacillus hordei, Enterobacter cloacae, and Exiguobacterium sibiricum were significantly or highly significantly different in relative abundance (p < 0.05 or p < 0.01).

The LEfSe method was used to evaluate differences in microbial communities between fresh material and silage and to explore specific bacterial species in each group [LDA score, > 5.0]. In YLS, 14 bacteria were significantly enriched, with Proteobacteria (LDA score, 5.94) having the highest LDA score (Fig. 3). There were six bacteria significantly enriched in AhSCK, with Firmicutes (LDA score, 5.95) having the highest LDA score. Levilactobacillus and Levilactobacillus brevis were significantly enriched in AhSLP, with both LDA scores of 5.46. Within AhSLF, Limosilactobacillus and L. fermentum were significantly enriched with an LDA score of 5.87. For AhSLG, only Enterobacteriaceae were significantly enriched with an LDA score of 5.25.

Fig. 3
figure 3

The linear discrimination analysis (LDA) coupled on the bacterial community of fresh material and amaranth on 60 days of ensiling, with effect size (LEfSe) analysis. The significant difference in species was estimated by an LDA score greater at default score = 5. The length of the histogram shows the LDA score of differences in these groups. The circles radiating from the inside to the outside of the evolutionary branching diagram represent the taxonomic levels from phylum to species; each small circle at a different taxonomic level represents a taxon at that level, and the size of the diameter of the small circle is proportional to the size of the relative abundance; the colouring principle is that the species with no significant differences are uniformly coloured in yellow, and the other differences are coloured in accordance with the subgroup of the species with the highest abundance. Different colours indicate different subgroups, and nodes of different colours indicate microbiota that play an important role in the subgroup represented by the colour. YLS, fresh amaranth; AhSCK, control group; AhSLP, commercial inoculant group; AhSLF, strain BL1 group; AhSLG, strain BL5 group

Full size image

KEGG gene function predictions

PICRUSt predicts the bacterial metabolic function in accordance with the KEGG pathway. In total, there were six different metabolic pathways shown in YLS and silage (Fig. 4A). The main predicted genes were assigned to metabolism, accounting for about 70% in the YLS and silage followed by the genetic information processing, environmental information processing and cellular process. The top 20 metabolic functions in level 2 are shown as Fig. 4B, where most of these metabolic pathways (15 pathways) were assigned to metabolism. Figure 4C showed the top 20 metabolic pathways at the third pathway level, carbohydrate metabolism and global and overview maps were the critical metabolic pathways at level 3. More interestingly, pyruvate metabolism, glycolysis/gluconeogenesis, and amino sugar and nucleotide sugar metabolism were enriched after ensiling. It is worth mentioning that the abundance of AhSLP for amino sugar and nucleotide sugar metabolism were significantly increased compared to YLS.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Functional predictions for silage microbiota with significantly different KEGG pathways (p < 0.05) among the three groups of silage (YLS, AhSCK, AhSLP, AhSLF, and AhSLG). KEGG pathways at Level 1 (A), Level 2 (B), and Level 3 (C) are represented. YLS, fresh amaranth; AhSCK, control group; AhSLP, commercial inoculant group; AhSLF, strain BL1 group; AhSLG, strain BL5 group. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01

Full size image

Among the pentose phosphate pathway, the trend of increasing abundance of AhSLF was the most pronounced. Overall, the performance of AhSLG in carbohydrate metabolism was poor compared to other treatments. Biosynthesis of antibiotics and Biosynthesis of amino acids were enriched after anaerobic fermentation process. However, the abundance of microbial metabolism in diverse environments decreased during ensiling. The metabolic pathways of AhSLF were significantly reduced and the biosynthesis of secondary metabolites and biosynthesis of antibiotics were significantly increased compared to fresh samples and silage. Importantly, the abundance of carbon metabolism in the silage without LAB addition was significantly lower than in the YLS and other treatments. Some metabolic pathways of amino acid metabolism, energy metabolism, nucleotide metabolism, and translation remained stable after fermentation.

Disscusion

LAB has been found and identified in forage crops, silage, and dairy products [31].In addition, LAB is the dominant microorganism in forage and silage [32]. Nonetheless, it can be a challenge to identify species among dichotomous species by morphological, physiological and biochemical tests [47]. The 16S rRNA sequence analysis identifies organisms by genus and species [35].

Strain BL1 was able to grow normally at pH 3.5–9.0 and weakly at pH 3.0 in our study. Strain BL5 was able to grow normally at pH 4.0–9.0. It indicated that strain BL1 had a high tolerance to acidity, and it was able to grow in a low pH condition. This conclusion was confirmed earlier in previous studies where L. fermentum showed intentional tolerance to low pH [48, 49]. It was found that both strains differed in the ability to grow in acidic environments, as well as in the temperature of the growth environments. Strain BL5 grew well at 10–45 ℃ and was able to grow weakly at 5 ℃. Nevertheless, strain BL1 was able to grow normally at 30–45 ℃ and weakly at 10 ℃, which can be attributed to long-term evolution and natural selection in a unique environment typical of grasslands [50]. In addition, strain BL1 was able to ferment more products compared to strain BL5.

Amaranth is a high protein forage grass. The CP and WSC contents of fresh amaranth were 9.19 and 0.52% DM, respectively, which were lower than those previously reported by Abbasi et al. [51]. The low levels of CP and WSC in this study may be related to the climate of the experimental area as well as photosynthesis, etc. [52, 53]. Fertilizer application, harvest season, sowing density and irrigation are key factors affecting the nutrient content of forage grasses [54]. The necessary conditions for obtaining high quality silage and high DM recovery are known to be a DM content of 300–350 g/kg and WSC content > 50 g/kg DM of raw material [29]. In this study, the DM content of fresh amaranth was in the range of DM content of high quality silage. While the WSC content of the fresh amaranth failed to satisfy the criteria for high-quality silage. And the amount of LAB attached to fresh amaranth was lower than 105 log10 cfu/g FM [55], the number of other harmful microorganisms attached was low. In previous studies, fresh material of different forage species (e.g. Leymus chinensis, paper mulberry, rice straw and whole-plant quinoa) had higher WSC content than amaranth, but the number of attached molds, yeast, aerobic bacteria, and Escherichia coli was similarly higher than fresh amaranth. However, the fermentation quality of the silage was good in all cases under poorer raw material conditions and by different means of silage [56,57,58,59,60,61], which is consistent with the results obtained in our study. The main explanation of this phenomenon may be due to the fact that when the amaranth enters the anaerobic fermentation stage, the reproductive metabolic activity of the anaerobic microorganisms attached to the surface gradually ceases. Meanwhile, these microorganisms utilise the sugars of amaranth for warmth and metabolic activities. However, the low sugar content of amaranth results in a relatively small amount of available sugar. The available sugar was used by LAB to proliferate and inhibited the reproductive metabolic activities of other aerobic microorganisms, which contributed to the proliferation of LAB and the sustained decrease in pH. It is worth mentioning that fresh amaranth has a low number of harmful micro-organisms (such as molds, yeast, aerobic bacteria, and Escherichia coli) attached to it. In addition, NDF and ADF contents were comparable to the fresh maize and Italian ryegrass [34, 44].

The abundance, taxonomy and characteristics of the attached microorganisms (especially LAB) are crucial for ensiling [32]. The addition of different types of LAB increased the content of fermentation substrates and promoted the growth of LAB to different degrees, and the LA which they produced decreased the pH and inhibited the proliferation of harmful bacteria (yeast and aerobic bacteria). Interestingly, the highest amount of LAB was attached to AhSLF, but LA content generated was lower than AhSLP (p < 0.05). This may be due to the fact that L. fermentum acts as a heterotypic fermenting LAB, producing LA, AA and CO2 through the pentose phosphate pathway, thus creating an acidic environment for silage [62]. This was also confirmed by the high AA content of AhSLF. BA was detected in AhSCK and AhSLG, especially the addition of L. graminis, which did not inhibit the production of spoilage acid and had a higher BA content than control group (p < 0.05). This may be explained by the high abundance of Xanthomonas oryzae which is high enough to be one of the dominant strains of AhSLG for silage fermentation (Fig. 2). pH is one of the key indicators to evaluate the good quality of silage [3]. It has been shown that spoilage bacteria can be inhibited by a lower acidic environment, and silage was considered well fermented when pH reached 4.20 [32, 63]. In this study, the pH of AhSLP and AhSLF were lower than 4.20, indicating that both treatments attained a good level of fermentation quality. The higher pH and lower CP content of AhSCK in comparison to the additive treatment may be due to the high accumulation of alkaline nitrogenous substances (e.g. ammonia and amines). The NH3-N content of silage with additives was lower than the control, while the CP content was higher than the control. Most of the NH3-N in silage is the result of protein degradation, which coincides with why silage without additives had low CP and high NH3-N content [64].

We performed high-throughput sequencing techniques to evaluate bacterial communities and structure, and to predict changes in metabolic function. Both Chao1 and Shannon indices have characteristics that reflect bacterial abundance and species diversity [65]. In this study, a significant difference in bacterial diversity was observed between YLS and different treatments of silage in terms of changes in Shannon’s index, which is consistent with previous reports, as undesirable microorganisms were inhibited by pH and LAB gradually dominated the entire fermentation process [66, 67], hence reduced α-diversity was observed. The coverage of fresh amaranth and silage exceeded 0.99, which indicated that sequencing could accurately screen the bacterial community with high confidence [68]. YLS and all treatments were well separated (Fig. 1), which suggested that the different additives had a definite effect on the bacterial community, which would be similar to the confirmed reports that additives increased the variability of the bacterial community and could explain the differences in silage quality [69].

Proteobacteria was the dominant phylum in YLS, accounting for about 90% of all bacterial species. In amaranth silage, the dominant phylum shifted from Proteobacteria to Firmicutes (Fig. 2), which was consistent with the results of previous studies [70]. At the genus level, there were significant differences between YLS and silage. In general, well-fermented silage were dominated by Lactobacillus, Lactococcus, Pedicoccus, Weissella, and Leuconostoc of the Firmicutes, which had the ability to decrease the initial pH of the silage and accelerate the anaerobic fermentation process. Pseudomonas, Pantoea and Paucibacter are Gram-negative bacteria harmful to silage fermentation [71], and they accounted for most of the epiphytic bacteria in YLS. They can compete with LAB for nutrients and cause deterioration of food and fermented feed. After ensiling, Pseudomonas, Pantoea and Paucibacter are reduced or completely suppressed. Some variation also existed in the strains of bacteria epiphytic in silage containing different LAB. The dominant species of AhSCK were L. plantarum and Lentilactobacillus buchneri, which confirmed that epiphytic harmful bacteria of fresh materials were rapidly inhibited under anaerobic environment and low pH stress. There are differences in the effect of different types of LAB on the silage fermentation. The dominant species of AhSLP was Levilactobacillus brevis. The dominant strains of AhSLG was Xanthomonas oryzae, a phytopathogenic bacterium capable of causing multiple diseases in globally important crops [72]. It successfully attached to the host plant by adhering to the plant surface, invading the cellular interstices of the host tissue, thereby obtaining nutrients and counteracting the plant defense response. It is noteworthy that L. graminis was not seen among the AhSLG-attached isolates, the reason for this being that L. graminis is in the early stages of fermentation, and is not present in sufficient numbers or abundance to be detected in the late stages of silage fermentation [72]. In addition, the abundance of pathogenic bacteria and Escherichia coli accounted for a high percentage of the epiphytic bacteria. These strains competed with LAB for substrate and adversely affected the fermentation of silage, as corroborated by the high BA content of AhSLG. The dominant species of AhSLF was L. fermentum. Antimicrobial activity of L. fermentum is mainly due to its ability to produce organic acids (mainly LA and AA) and antimicrobial peptides [73]. The potential probiotic properties of L. fermentum strains were verified by in vitro digestion techniques. It has also been shown that L. fermentum is capable of fermenting dietary fiber and releasing short-chain fatty acids (including PA, BA, AA, and LA) in the intestine [74, 75]. This is sufficient to show that silage supplemented with L. fermentum had the most epiphytic LAB, the lowest pH and relatively high LA and AA content. The culture supernatant of L. fermentum at low pH showed greater inhibition of Staphylococcus aureus, Listeria monocytogenes, Escherichia coli, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, demonstrated a significant correlation between the inhibition activity of this strain and the low pH caused by organic acids [76], it showed similar results to the present study.

Ensiling is dominated by microbial activity. It degrades substrates or converts metabolites through complex metabolic pathways. The functional characteristics of bacterial communities in raw materials and silage were predicted using PICRUSt software, based on the KEGG databases, and the metabolic pathways of their epiphytic bacteria were analyzed. In KEGG analysis, metabolism was the main metabolic pathway, indicating that bacteria can convert substrates into various metabolites through bacterial activity in the metabolic pathway. Carbohydrate metabolism and global and overview maps were the most important metabolic categories for raw materials and silage. Pyruvate metabolism, glycolysis/gluconeogenesis, amino acid sugar, and nucleotide sugar metabolism were essential components of carbohydrate metabolism. In the present study, the proportion of carbohydrate metabolic pathways was higher in silage than in raw materials, reflecting the community dynamics and metabolic activity of the main LAB. In particular, the propionic acid metabolism, pentose phosphate pathway and glycolytic abundance of AhSLG were lower than other treatments, which suggested that the L. graminis was not as metabolically competent as homozygous fermentative LAB [62], resulting in high pH and low production of LA and AA in L. graminis-containing silage, which consequently failed to inhibit the growth and reproduction of epiphytic harmful microorganisms. The abundance of pentose phosphate pathway was higher in AhSLF than in other silage. This is due to the fact that L. fermentum is a parthenogenic hetero-fermentation LAB that metabolizes pentose through the pentose phosphate pathway to produce LA and AA. The high LA and AA content detected in AhSLF and the high abundance of epiphytic L. fermentum and L. plantarum also corroborate this phenomenon.

Metabolic pathways, biosynthesis of secondary metabolites, biosynthesis of antibiotics, microbial metabolism in diverse environments, biosynthesis of amino acids, and carbon metabolism were the essential parts of global and overview maps. The synthesis of secondary metabolites varies from strain to strain and also controls the synthesis of antibiotics. However, until now, there is no agreement on the physiological functions of secondary metabolites and antibiotics in silage. The abundance of microbial metabolism in different environments was higher in the fresh material and decreased after the fermentation process. It shows that the fermentation process of silage effectively reduced some undesirable microorganisms attached to the environment, which is consistent with the data of microbial diversity (Fig. 2). The high metabolic abundance of AhSLG indicates that the microbial cellular activity at the early stage of silage fermentation in response to changes in the growth environment is rapidly changing metabolic responses. It also can further prove that L. graminis is more active in the early stage of fermentation. Amino acid synthesis occurs primarily through transamination, where the amino group of an amino acid is transferred to a keto acid to form a new amino acid. Microorganisms can consume some amino acids in excess to obtain some amino acids in lesser amounts through transamination. The metabolic abundance of amino acid synthesis was higher for AhSCK and AhSLF than other treatments, which also had relatively high amino acid metabolic abundance. Amino acid metabolism is necessary to promote primary metabolism and plant protein synthesis in plants [77]. The level of metabolic abundance may reflect the ability of the initial microbial population in the silage to synthesize amino acids. In our study, the abundance of cysteine and methionine, glycine, serine and threonine metabolism was higher in AhSCK and AhSLF than in other treatments. This may be related to the high abundance of epiphytic L. fermentum, but it needs further verification. Thus, the dynamics of amino acid metabolism observed in fresh materials and silage may reflect the metabolism of dominant populations throughout the ensiling process.

Conclusions

The bacterial community of fresh amaranth was found to be dominated by Pantoea agglomerans, Pseudomonas oryzihabitans, Cenchrus americanus. The bacterial community of amaranth with and without the addition of LAB underwent significant changes after fermentation. Silage with the addition of strain BL1 (L. fermentum) and strain BL5 (L.graminis) had substantially different fermentation characteristics due to their fermentation pathways. It is noteworthy that in silage containing L.graminis, pathogenic bacteria, Xanthomonas oryzae, became the dominant strain in the silage process. And L.graminis failed to inhibit the growth and reproduction of harmful microorganisms. With the addition of L. fermentum, it dominates and thus reduces the pH. By comprehensive consideration, L. fermentum can be recommended as an additive to improve the quality of amaranth silage, as it regulates the epiphytic microbiota in silage, improving the fermentation quality andmetabolic capacity of the bacterial community.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

References

  1. Simon JE. Essential oils and culinary herbs. In: Janick J, Simon JE, editors. Advances in new crops. Portland: Timber Press; 1990. p. 484–9.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Myers RL. Amaranth: new crop opportunity progress in new crops. Alexandria, VA: ASHS Press; 1996. p. 207–20.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Da Silva NC, Nascimento CF, Nascimento FA, De Resende FD, Daniel JLP, Siqueira GR. Fermentation and aerobic stability of rehydrated corn grain silage treated with different doses of Lactobacillus buchneri or a combination of Lactobacillus plantarum and Pediococcus acidilactici. J Dairy Sci. 2018;101(5):4158–67.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Abbasi D, Rouzbehan Y, Rezaei J. Effect of harvest date and nitrogen fertilization rate on the nutritive value of amaranth forage (Amaranthus hypochondriacus). Anim Feed Sci Tech. 2012;171(1):6–13.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Rezaei J, Rouzbehan Y, Fazaeli H, Zahedifar M. Effects of substituting amaranth silage for corn silage on intake, growth performance, diet digestibility, microbial protein, nitrogen retention and ruminal fermentation in fattening lambs. Anim Feed Sci Tech. 2014;192:29–38.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Stallknecht GF, Schulz-Schaeffer JR. Amaranth rediscovered. New York: New crops. Wiley; 1993. p. 211–8.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rezaei J, Rouzbehan Y, Fazaeli H. Nutritive value of fresh and ensiled amaranth (Amaranthus hypochondriacus) treated with different levels of molasses. Anim Feed Sci Tech. 2009;151(1–2):153–60.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Rabbani H. Study on silage characteristics of two varieties of amaranth forage (amaranthus hypochondriacus) and its comparison with corn silage. Hamadan: Department of Animal Science Bu-Ali Sina University; 2012. p. 81.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rahjerdi NK, Rouzbehan Y, Fazaeli H, Rezaei J. Chemical composition, fermentation characteristics, digestibility, and degradability of silages from two amaranth varieties (Kharkovskiy and Sem), corn, and an amaranth-corn combination. J Anim Sci. 2015;93(12):5781–90.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Puntillo M, Peralta GH, Burgi MDM, Huber P, Gaggiotti M, Binetti AG, Vinderola G. Metaprofiling of the bacterial community in sorghum silages inoculated with lactic acid bacteria. J Appl Microbiol. 2022;133(4):2375–89.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Shah AA, Qian C, Liu Z, Wu J, Sultana N, Mobashar M, Wanapat M, Zhong X. Evaluation of biological and chemical additives on microbial community, fermentation characteristics, aerobic stability, and in vitro gas production of SuMu No. 2 elephant grass. J Sci Food Agr. 2021;101(13):5429–36.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Shah AA, Liu Z, Qian C, Wu J, Zhong X, Kalsoom UE. Effect of endophytic Bacillus megaterium colonization on structure strengthening, microbial community, chemical composition and stabilization properties of Hybrid Pennisetum. J Sci Food Agr. 2020;100(3):1164–73.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Shah AA, Yuan X, Dong Z, Wang S, Shao T. Effects of lactic acid bacteria on ensiling characteristics, chemical composition and aerobic stability of king grass. J Anim Plant Sci. 2017;3:747–55.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Shah AA, Yuan XJ, Dong ZH, Li JF, Shao T. Microbiological and chemical profiles of elephant grass inoculated with and without Lactobacillus plantarum and Pediococcus acidilactici. Arch Microbiol. 2018;200:311–28.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Carvalho BF, Sales GFC, Schwan RF, Avila CLS. Criteria for lactic acid bacteria screening to enhance silage quality. J Appl Microbiol. 2021;130(2):341–55.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Shah AA, Yuan X, Dong Z, Li J, Shao T. Isolation and molecular identification of lactic acid bacteria from king grass and their application to improve the fermentation quality of sweet Sorghum. World J Microb Biot. 2018;34:1–13.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Gallagher D, Parker D, Allen DJ, Tsesmetzis N. Dynamic bacterial and fungal microbiomes during sweet sorghum ensiling impact bioethanol production. Bioresour technol. 2018;264:163–73.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Alhaag H, Yuan X, Mala A, Bai J, Shao T. Fermentation characteristics of Lactobacillus plantarum and Pediococcus species isolated from sweet sorghum silage and their application as silage inoculants. Appl Sci. 2019;9(6):1247.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Cao C, Bao W, Li W, Zhao F, Kwok LY, Zhang W, Zhang H. Changes in physico-chemical characteristics and viable bacterial communities during fermentation of alfalfa silages inoculated with Lactobacillus plantarum. World J Microb Biot. 2021;37:1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  20. da Silva ÉB, Liu X, Mellinger C, Gressley TF, Stypinski JD, Moyer NA, JrL K. Effect of dry matter content on the microbial community and on the effectiveness of a microbial inoculant to improve the aerobic stability of corn silage. J Dairy Sci. 2022;105(6):5024–43.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Xu Z, He H, Zhang S, Guo T, Kong J. Characterization of feruloyl esterases produced by the four lactobacillus species: L. amylovorus, L. acidophilus, L. farciminis and L. fermentum, isolated from ensiled corn stover. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:941.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Shah AA, Qian C, Wu J, Liu Z, Khan S, Tao Z, Zhang X, Khan IU, Zhong X. Effects of natamycin and Lactobacillus plantarum on the chemical composition, microbial community, and aerobic stability of Hybrid pennisetum at different temperatures. RSC Adv. 2020;10(15):8692–702.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Fijalkowska M, Przemieniecki SW, Purwin C, Lipinski K, Kurowski TP, Karwowska A. The effect of an additive containing three Lactobacillus species on the fermentation pattern and microbiological status of silage. J Sci Food Agr. 2020;100(3):1174–84.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Shah AA, Wu J, Qian C, Liu Z, Mobashar M, Tao Z, Zhang X, Zhong X. Ensiling of whole-plant hybrid pennisetum with natamycin and Lactobacillus plantarum impacts on fermentation characteristics and meta-genomic microbial community at low temperature. J Sci Food Agr. 2020;100(8):3378–85.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Cheong JZA, Johnson CJ, Wan H, Liu A, Kernien JF, Gibson ALF, Nett JE, Kalan LR. Priority effects dictate community structure and alter virulence of fungal-bacterial biofilms. ISME J. 2021;15(7):2012–27.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Cheng Q, Li P, Xiao B, Yang F, Li D, Ge G, Jia Y, Bai S. Effects of LAB inoculant and cellulase on the fermentation quality and chemical composition of forage soybean silage prepared with corn stover. Grassl Sci. 2021;67(1):83–90.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Lee SM, Donaldson GP, Mikulski Z, Boyajian S, Ley K, Mazmanian SK. Bacterial colonization factors control specificity and stability of the gut microbiota. Nat. 2013;501(7467):426–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Furman O, Shenhav L, Sasson G, Kokou F, Honig H, Jacoby S, Hertz T, Cordero OX, Halperin E, Mizrahi I. Stochasticity constrained by deterministic effects of diet and age drive rumen microbiome assembly dynamics. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):1904.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Wang S, Dong Z, Li J, Chen L, Shao T. Pediococcus acidilactici strains as silage inoculants for improving the fermentation quality, nutritive value and in vitro ruminal digestibility in different forages. J Appl Microbiol. 2019;126(2):424–34.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Duan Y, Tan Z, Wang Y, Li Z, Li Z, Qin G, Cai Y. Identification and characterization of lactic acid bacteria isolated from tibetan qula cheese. J Gen Appl Microbiol. 2008;54(1):51–60.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. You S, Du S, Ge G, Wan T, Jia Y. Selection of lactic acid bacteria from native grass silage and its effects as inoculant on silage fermentation. Agron J. 2021;113(4):3169–77.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Cai Y, Suyanandana P, Saman P, Benno Y. Classification and characterization of lactic acid bacteria isolated from the intestines of common carp and freshwater prawns. J Gen Appl Microbiol. 1999;45(4):177–84.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Cai Y, Benno Y, Ogawa M, Kumai S. Effect of applying lactic acid bacteria isolated from forage crops on fermentation characteristics and aerobic deterioration of silage. J Dairy Sci. 1999;82(3):520–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Wang S, Sun Y, Zhao J, Dong Z, Li J, Nazar M, Shao T. Assessment of inoculating various epiphytic microbiota on fermentative profile and microbial community dynamics in sterile Italian ryegrass. J Appl Microbiol. 2020;129:509–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Ennahar S, Cai Y, Fujita Y. Phylogenetic diversity of lactic acid bacteria associated with paddy rice silage as determined by 16S ribosomal DNA analysis. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003;69(1):444–51.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Zhang Q, Wu B, Nishino N, Wang X, Yu Z. Fermentation and microbial population dynamics during the ensiling of native grass and subsequent exposure to air. Anim Sci J. 2016;87(3):389–97.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Patrica C. Official Method of Analysis of AOAC International. 16th ed. Washington, DC: AOAC International; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci. 1991;74(10):3583–97.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Chen L, Guo G, Yu C, Zhang J, Shimojo M, Shao T. The effects of replacement of whole-plant corn with oat and common vetch on the fermentation quality, chemical composition and aerobic stability of total mixed ration silage in tibet. Anim Sci J. 2015;86(1):69–76.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Cai Y. Analysis method for silage. Field Lab Methods Grassl Sci; Jpn Soc Grassl Sci, Ed, 2004: 279–282.

  41. Broderick GA, Kang JH. Automated simultaneous determination of ammonia and total amino acids in ruminal fluid and in vitro media. J Dairy Sci. 1980;63(1):64–75.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. You S, Du S, Ge G, Wan T, Jia Y. Microbial community and fermentation characteristics of native grass prepared without or with isolated lactic acid bacteria on the Mongolian Plateau. Front Microbiol. 2021;12:731770.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Liu B, Huan H, Gu H, Xu N, Shen Q, Ding C. Dynamics of a microbial community during ensiling and upon aerobic exposure in lactic acid bacteria inoculation-treated and untreated barley silages. Bioresour Technol. 2019;273:212–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Guo L, Wang X, Lin Y, Yang X, Ni K, Yang F. Effects of delayed harvest and additives on fermentation quality and bacterial community of corn stalk silage. Front Microbiol. 2021;12:687481.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Caporaso JG, Kuczynski J, Stombaugh J, Bittinger K, Bushman FD, Costello EK, Knight R. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat Methods. 2010;7(5):335–6.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Segata N, Izard J, Waldron L, Gevers D, Miropolsky L, Garrett WS, Huttenhower C. Metagenomic biomarker discovery and explanation. Genome biol. 2011;12:1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Chen MM, Liu QH, Xin GR, Zhang JG. Characteristics of lactic acid bacteria isolates and their inoculating effects on the silage fermentation at high temperature. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2013;56(1):71–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Chen X, Zhao X, Wang H, Yang Z, Li J, Suo H. Prevent effects of Lactobacillus Fermentum HY01 on dextran sulfate sodium-induced colitis in mice. Nutrients. 2017;9:545.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Chu-Ky S, Bui TK, Nguyen TL, Ho PH. Acid adaptation to improve viability and X-prolyl dipeptidyl aminopeptidase activity of the probiotic bacterium Lactobacillus fermentum HA6 exposed to simulated gastrointestinal tract conditions. Int J Food Sci Tech. 2014;49(2):565–70.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Cheng Q, Li M, Fan X, Chen Y, Sun H, Xie Y, Zheng Y, Chen C, Li P. Effects of epiphytic and exogenous lactic acid bacteria on fermentation quality and microbial community compositions of paper mulberry silage. Front Microbiol. 2022;13:973500.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Abbasi M, Rouzbehan Y, Rezaei J, Jacobsen SE. The effect of lactic acid bacteria inoculation, molasses, or wilting on the fermentation quality and nutritive value of amaranth (Amaranthus hypochondriaus) silage. J Anim Sci. 2018;96(9):3983–92.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Ding Z, Bai J, Xu D, Li F, Zhang Y, Guo X. Microbial community dynamics and natural fermentation profiles of ensiled alpine grass Elymus nutans prepared from different regions of the qinghai-tibetan plateau. Front Microbiol. 2020;11:855.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Zi X, Li M, Yu D, Tang J, Zhou H, Chen Y. Natural fermentation quality and bacterial community of 12 Pennisetum sinese varieties in Southern China. Front Microbiol. 2021;12:627820.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Vasco-Correa J, Li Y. Solid-state anaerobic digestion of fungal pretreated Miscanthus sinensis harvested in two different seasons. Bioresour Technol. 2015;185:211–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Dong L, Zhan H, Gao Y, Diao Q. Dynamic profiles of fermentation characteristics and bacterial community composition of Broussonetia papyrifera ensiled with perennial ryegrass. Bioresour Technol. 2020;310:123396.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. He L, Zhou W, Xing Y, Pian R, Chen X, Zhang Q. Improving the quality of rice straw silage with Moringa oleifera leaves and propionic acid: fermentation, nutrition, aerobic stability and microbial communities. Bioresour Technol. 2020;299:122579.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Zhang YC, Li DX, Wang XK, Lin YL, Zhang Q, Chen XY, Yang FY. Fermentation quality and aerobic stability of mulberry silage prepared with lactic acid bacteria and propionic acid. Anim Sci J. 2019;90(4):513–22.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Wu B, Hu Z, Wei M, Yong M, Niu H. Effects of inoculation of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum and Lentilactobacillus buchneri on fermentation quality, aerobic stability, and microbial community dynamics of wilted Leymus chinensis silage. Front Microbiol. 2022;13:928731.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Wu C, Sun W, Huang Y, Dai S, Peng C, Zheng Y, Chen C, Hao J. Effects of different additives on the bacterial community and fermentation mode of whole-plant paper mulberry silage. Front Microbiol. 2022;13:904193.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Du S, You S, Jiang X, Li Y, Jia Y. Dynamics of the fermentation quality and microbiotsa in Ephedra sinica treated native grass silage. J Appl Microbiol. 2022;133(6):3465–75.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Fang D, Dong Z, Wang D, Li B, Shi P, Yan J, Zhuang D, Shao T, Wang W, Gu M. Evaluating the fermentation quality and bacterial community of high-moisture whole-plant quinoa silage ensiled with different additives. J Appl Microbiol. 2022;132(5):3578–89.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Gänzle MG. Lactic metabolism revisited: metabolism of lactic acid bacteria in food fermentations and food spoilage. Curr Opin Food Sci. 2015;2:106–17.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Ahmadi F, Lee YH, Lee WH, Oh YK, Park K, Kwak WS. Long-term anaerobic conservation of fruit and vegetable discards without or with moisture adjustment after aerobic preservation with sodium metabisulfite. Waste Manage. 2019;87:258–67.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Van Vuuren AM, Huhtanen P, Dulphy JP. Improving the feeding and health value of ensiled forages Recent developments in the nutrition of herbivores (Clermont Ferrand, September 11–15, 1995). Paris: Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique; 1995. p. 279–307.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Guan H, Yan Y, Li X, Li X, Shuai Y, Feng G, Ran Q, Cai Y, Li Y, Zhang X. Microbial communities and natural fermentation of corn silages prepared with farm bunker-silo in Southwest China. Bioresour Technol. 2018;265:282–90.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Ren H, Sun W, Yan Z, Zhang Y, Wang Z, Song B, Zheng Y, Li J. Bioaugmentation of sweet sorghum ensiling with rumen fluid: fermentation characteristics, chemical composition, microbial community, and enzymatic digestibility of silages. J Clean Pr. 2021;294:126308.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Xu D, Wang N, Rinne M, Ke W, Weinberg ZG, Da M, Bai J, Zhang Y, Li F, Guo X. The bacterial community and metabolome dynamics and their interactions modulate fermentation process of whole crop corn silage prepared with or without inoculants. Microb Biotechnol. 2021;14(2):561–76.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Yang L, Yuan X, Li J, Dong Z, Shao T. Dynamics of microbial community and fermentation quality during ensiling of sterile and nonsterile alfalfa with or without Lactobacillus plantarum inoculant. Bioresour Technol. 2019;275:280–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Ni K, Wang F, Zhu B, Yang J, Zhou G, Pan Y, Tao Y, Zhong J. Effects of lactic acid bacteria and molasses additives on the microbial community and fermentation quality of soybean silage. Bioresour Technol. 2017;238:706–15.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Du Z, Yamasaki S, Oya T, Nguluve D, Euridse D, Tinga B, Macome F, Cai Y. Microbial co-occurrence network and fermentation information of natural woody-plant silage prepared with grass and crop by-product in Southern Africa. Front Microbiol. 2022;13:756209.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Dong Z, Li J, Chen L, Wang S, Shao T. Effects of freeze-thaw event on microbial community dynamics during red clover ensiling. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:1559.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Büttner D, Bonas U. Regulation and secretion of Xanthomonas virulence factors. Fems Microbiol Rev. 2010;34(2):107–33.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Poornachandra Rao K, Sreenivasa M Y. Probiotic lactobacillus strains and their antimicrobial peptides to counteract biofilm-associated infections: a promising biological approach. SM J Bioinform Proteom, 2016;1(2):1009.

  74. Meenakshi Malhotra IK. Identification of Lactobacillus Fermentum strains with potential against colorectal cancer by characterizing short chain fatty acids production, anti-proliferative activity and survival in an intestinal fluid in vitro analysis. J Bioanal Biomed. 2015. https://doi.org/10.4172/1948-593X.1000132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Westfall S, Lomis N, Prakash S. Longevity extension in Drosophila through gut-brain communication. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):8362.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. Halimi S, Mirsalehian A. Assessment and comparison of probiotic potential of four Lactobacillus species isolated from feces samples of Iranian infants. Microbiol Immunol. 2016;60(2):73–81.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Wang S, Li J, Zhao J, Dong Z, Dong D, Shao T. Effect of epiphytic microbiota from napier grass and Sudan grass on fermentation characteristics and bacterial community in oat silage. J Appl Microbiol. 2022;132(2):919–32.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Key Laboratory of Forage Cultivation and the Processing and Highly Efficient Utilization of the Ministry of Agriculture, the Key Laboratory of Grassland Resources of the Ministry of Education, and funded by the National Technical System of Forage Industry for Dry Grass Storage (CARS-34) and Research and Demonstration of Key Technology for Processing, Utilization and Storage of "Double Increase and Double Extraction" of Alfalfa (2021GG0109).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Key Laboratory of Forage Cultivation, Processing and High Efficient Utilization of Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, College of Grassland, Resources and Environment, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, China

    Muqier Zhao, Jian Bao, Zhijun Wang, Shuai Du, Cuiping Gao, Dinghan Nan, Xingquan Yan & Gentu Ge

  2. Key Laboratory of Grassland Resources of Ministry of Education, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, China

    Muqier Zhao, Jian Bao, Zhijun Wang, Shuai Du, Cuiping Gao, Dinghan Nan, Xingquan Yan & Gentu Ge

Authors
  1. Muqier Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jian Bao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zhijun Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Shuai Du
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Cuiping Gao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Dinghan Nan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Xingquan Yan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Gentu Ge
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

MZ: conceptualization, investigation, visualization, methodology, formal analysis, writing—original draft. JB: conceptualization, investigation, formal analysis. ZW: supervision, writing—review & editing. SD: conceptualization, investigation, formal analysis. CG: conceptualization, investigation, formal analysis. DN: conceptualization, investigation, formal analysis. XY: conceptualization, investigation, formal analysis. GG: conceptualization, methodology, validation, investigation, writing—review & editing, funding acquisition.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gentu Ge.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhao, M., Bao, J., Wang, Z. et al. Evaluation of the fermentation performance and functional properties of bacterial communities of amaranth silage supplemented with Limosilactobacillus fermentum and Latilactobacillus graminis. Chem. Biol. Technol. Agric. 10, 103 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40538-023-00476-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40538-023-00476-7

Keywords