A new insight on the genus Pteridium (Dennstaedtiaceae) in Europe based on a revision in the flora of Slovakia

Background The genus Pteridium Gled. ex Scop. was thought to be monotypic with the cosmopolitan species P. aquilinum (L.) Kuhn. for many years. However, morphological variations among these plants in different regions have been noted since the 1940’s, leading to the description of new taxa later. Molecular investigations, while not resolving all taxonomical questions within the genus, have highlighted its rich genetic diversity globally, confirming the status of several previously described species and subspecies. This wealth of data has prompted revisions of the Pteridium genus in regional floras, with Northern Eurasia serving as a central arena for such studies in the last 30 years. Recent data suggest that the European flora comprises a single species, P. aquilinum, with two subspecies, P. a. subsp. aquilinum and P. a. subsp. pinetorum (C.N. Page & R.R. Mill) J.A. Thomson. However, their distribution within the continent remains unclear. Therefore, this study aims to elucidate the representation and distribution of Pteridium taxa in Slovakia with an attempt to describe natural ranges of P. aquilinum subspecies based on herbarium materials and citizen science data within Europe for a whole. Results It is confirmed that the genus Pteridium is represented by the single species with two mentioned subspecies in the flora of Europe, as well as in the flora of Slovakia. The distribution of these subspecies is mapped in the country. Additionally, we discuss the ranges of these subspecies for a whole, and we evidence the growth of P. aquilinum subsp. pinetorum within the Netherlands, Czechia, Austria, Hungary and Romania for the first time. Also, two new combinations of taxa from the Asian part of Russia are offered. Conclusion Our study is a significant contribution in the present knowledge about the distribution and taxonomy of P. aquilinum, however it also shows that many questions concerning this taxon and its infraspecific taxa remain open. Additional field investigations and herbarium processing should be carried out for detailed explorations of biological and ecological peculiarities of the mentioned subspecies, and for the clear understanding of their regional distribution. Such explorations also might become a basis for new syntaxonomic revisions. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40529-024-00423-1.


Background
The Slovak Republic is a relatively small country located in Central Europe, but with a rich flora within the European Union.The study of vegetation cover of the modern territory of Slovakia has been started by Lumnitzer (Lumnitzer 1791), Endlicher (Endlicher 1830) and Reuss (Reuss 1853) since the end of the eighteenth century-the first part of the nineteenth century, and the last sources mention here 4253 taxa of native and alien vascular plants (Medvecká et al. 2012).However, the exploration process of the local flora is actively going on at present: enough many new native and alien species for the country have been recently discovered (Király et al. 2014;Dítě et al. 2019;Kobiv et al. 2022;Eliáš Jr. et al. 2023).Nonetheless, there are a few groups of plants, like leptosporangiate ferns, which are studied sporadically in Slovakia, therefore information about them is rarely updated.So, it was known 44 species of Polypodiidae including their hybrids 57 years ago (Futák et al. 1966), but this number increased until 50 species 32 years later (Marhold and Hindák 1998) that was mostly connected with changes of taxonomic ranks of some subspecies till species.Only one species of ferns, Asplenium platyneuron (L.) Britton, Sterns & Poggenb., was discovered in the country from that time (Ekrt and Hrivnák 2010).However, it cannot be said that the exploration of Polypodiidae is over in the Slovak flora, and our new insight on the genus Pteridium (Dennstaedtiaceae) is a confirmation of this affirmation.
For a long time, the genus Pteridium Gled.ex Scop.was considered in the world flora as monotypic, i.e. with one cosmopolitan species P. aquilinum (L.) Kuhn.But, botanists have paid attention to the differentiation of morphological peculiarities of these plants in different regions of our planet since the 40's of the last century.At that time, Tryon described 2 subspecies and 12 varieties within the species (Tryon 1941).The activation of the study of Pteridium started in the end of the 80's-90's when several subspecies, varieties and a new species (P.pinetorum C.N. Page & R.R. Mill) were described in Europe (Page 1989;Page & Mill 1994, 1995).The next stage in Pteridium exploration is connected with the results of molecular investigations which have not given answers to all taxonomical questions within the genus yet, but they show its rich genetic diversity around the world that allows separating several species and subspecies from the previous single one (Thomson 2000(Thomson , 2004;;Der et al. 2009;Zhou et al. 2014;Wolf et al. 2019).
All these data have become a basis for revisions of Pteridium genus in regional floras, and Northern Eurasia has become a central arena of the processing during last 30 years (Tutin et al. 1993;Tzvelev 2003Tzvelev , 2005Tzvelev , 2010;;Thomson 2004;Gureyeva and Page 2008;Frank 2008;Tikhomirov 2009;Tzvelev and Geltman 2012;Zhou et al. 2014;Zając et al. 2019;Wolf et al. 2019;Zenkteler and Nowak 2019;Zenkteler et al. 2022).Moreover, clarification of the species composition of Pteridium in the flora of Eastern Europe grew into a heated scientific discussion where from 2 to 4 species of the genus were given at different times (Tzvelev 2003(Tzvelev , 2005(Tzvelev , 2010;;Gureyeva and Page 2008;Gureyeva 2011;Tzvelev and Geltman 2012).Though, there is no final agreed conception yet, according to the last published data of morphological and molecular investigations (Thomson 2000(Thomson , 2004;;Der et al. 2009;Tikhomirov 2009;Zhou et al. 2014;Wolf et al. 2019;Zenkteler and Nowak 2019;Zenkteler et al. 2022) only the single species (P.aquilinum) with two subspecies (P.a. subsp.aquilinum (L.) Kuhn and P. a. subsp.pinetorum (C.N.Page & R.R. Mill) J.A. Thomson) is presented in the flora of Europe.But, the question "how are they distributed within the continent?"remains open.
The described situation made us think about the subspecies composition of Pteridium in Central Europe, namely in Slovakia and its some neighboring countries, especially since the two mentioned subspecies of P. aquilinum were noted for Poland (Zając et al. 2019;Zenkteler and Nowak 2019).As well, P. aquilinum, P. latiusculum (Desv.)Hieron.and P. pinetorum were listed for the flora of the Ukrainian Carpathians (Tzvelev 2005;Vasheka and Bezsmertna 2012).Therefore, we set a goal to figure out which taxa of the genus Pteridium are represented in Slovakia, and how it/they is/are distributed within the country.Also, we tried to describe natural ranges of P. aquilinum subspecies based on herbarium materials and citizen science data within Europe for a whole.

Methods
The research was carried out during 2022-2023, but it is based on the results of our long-term field explorations within Slovakia and its neighboring countries, the processing of herbarium materials in BP, BRA, SAV, SLO, ZV (here and beyond herbarium acronyms are given according to the Index Herbariorum: https:// sweet gum.nybg.org/ scien ce/ ih/), as well as data from, a citizen science platform, iNaturalist (https:// www.inatu ralist.org).The list of checked herbarium specimens and citizen science observations are given in Supplementary materials A.
Nowadays there is no the single consensus on the rank of taxa in the genus Pteridium.For example, Eurasian P. pinetorum is being considered as a separated species (Page and Mill 1994), or also as a subspecies of P. aquilinum or P. latiusculum: P. aquilinum subsp.latiusculum (Desv.)Hultér (Karlsson 2000), P. aquilinum subsp.pinetorum (Thomson 2004;Wolf et al. 2019), P. aquilinum subsp.japonicum (Nakai) Á.Löve & D.Löve (Zhou et al. 2014) or P. latiusculum subsp.pinetorum (C.N.Page & R.R. Mill) Fraser-Jenk.(Fraser-Jenkins 1997;Fraser-Jenkins et al. 2015) respectively.No doubt such confusion found its way into the leading taxonomic databases.For example, POWO (https:// powo.scien ce.kew.org), and Euro+Med PlantBase (https:// europ lusmed.org) accept P. pinetorum as an independent species, Tropicos (https:// www.tropi cos.org) gives P. aquilinum subsp.japonicum and/or P. a. var.latiusculum (Desv.)Underw.ex A. Heller as accepted names for this taxon, but World Flora Online (https:// wfopl antli st.org) considers P. pinetorum, P. aquilinum subsp.pinetorum and P. a. var.pinetorum (C.N.Page & R.R.Mill) Perestor.as synonyms of P. latiusculum subsp.pinetorum.Since establishing the status of taxa in the genus Pteridium was not the task of our study, we adopted the most reasonable, in our opinion, point of view on this debatable issue based on the results by Wolf et al. (2019) and partially by Der et al. (2009) with Zhou et al. (2014).So, we suggest that only P. aquilinum with two subspecies (P.a. subsp.aquilinum and P. a. subsp.pinetorum) is presented in the flora of Europe.The identification of these Pteridium subspecies is based on morphological criteria described in literature (Page and Mill 1994;Frank 2008;Tikhomirov 2009;Zenkteler and Nowak 2019;Zenkteler et al. 2022).However, it is worth to note that we considered these mentioned subspecies on the species level on earlier stages of our research, therefore our Notae criticae we left in herbarium collections contain the name "Pteridium pinetorum C.N. Page & R.R. Mill" that actually should be accepted as P. aquilinum subsp.pinetorum.
The maps of currently known locations of P. a. subsp.aquilinum and P. a. subsp.pinetorum in Slovakia was produced by available tools at the website "Simplemappr" (https:// www.simpl emappr.net).
In Supplementary Materials A, Slovak localities of these subspecies of P. aquilinum are included into phytogeographic districts according to Futák (Futák 1984), and there are sorted according to the Guidelines for processing the flora of Slovakia (Futák 1973).The classification of sites is based on the actual location of the site and may not always agree with what is stated on the herbarium item.In the case of old historical names of municipalities, we also mention their current names in parentheses.
New taxonomic combinations are offered regarding the rules of the current edition of the International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (Shenzhen Code), namely Article 41 (Turland et al. 2018).

Results
The genus Pteridium is represented by the single species (P.aquilinum) with two subspecies (P.a. subsp.aquilinum and P. a. subsp.pinetorum in the flora of Slovakia.These subspecies have never been noted for the country either in publications and online databases, therefore to aid in their better identification, we have given the genus system for Slovakia with relevant nomenclature citations, an identification key, and up-to-date information regarding their distribution in the region.Also, some synonyms which have been used in European floras are given additionally to escape misunderstanding.Notes: some previous authors named this taxon as P. aquilinum (L.) Kuhn subsp.latiusculum (Desv.)C.N. Page (Page 1989); P. aquilinum subsp.latiusculum (Desv.)Hultér (Karlsson 2000), P. latiusculum (Desv.)Hieron.ex Fries (Tzvelev 2005;Tzvelev and Geltman 2012), but these names might be correctly applied to a subspecies of P. aquilinum from North America described from Newfoundland (Canada), not occurring in Slovakia and Europe in general.As well, the name, P. aquilinum (L.) Kuhn subsp.japonicum (Nakai) Á. Löve & D. Löve, was used by Zhou & al. (Zhou et al. 2014) for European specimens of this taxon, but this subspecies is distributed only in the North-Eastern Asian region with its lectotype from Japan.Thus, the best name for European plants noted under the mentioned taxa is Pteridium aquilinum subsp.pinetorum.
Distribution: Western, Northern, Central and Eastern Europe (exclude the Crimean Peninsula), Asian part of Russia, Kazakhstan, Mongolia, and China.
Distribution in Slovakia: whole territory, except of agriculture used Pannonian parts of country (more details in Supplementary Materials A, as well as Fig. 2.).

Discussion
The subspecies of Pteridium aquilinum in Slovakia.The occurrence of two subspecies of P. aquilinum in the flora of Slovakia is expected, because P. a. subsp.pinetorum or P. pinetorum has been previously reported in neighboring regions of Poland (Zając et al. 2019;Zenkteler and Nowak 2019) and Ukraine (Tzvelev 2005;Tzvelev and Geltman 2012;Vasheka and Bezsmertna 2012) for several times earlier.However, an unpredicted moment is that P. aquilinum subsp.pinetorum is a common subspecies for the country based on the processed herbarium and citizen science data, meanwhile P. a. subsp.aquilinum is significantly rarer here.Likely, the latter subspecies should be regarded as a rare taxon in Slovakia.However, this suggestion requires additional field investigations.As well, detailed studies of the distribution of the P. aquilinum subspecies should be implemented in the country in the near future, ideally with the use of herbarium data from Austria and Czechia.Moreover, such investigations are needed to establish the common ranges of P. a. subsp.aquilinum and P. a. subsp.pinetorum in details, because presently there is a lack of relevant information.
Also, biology and ecology of these subspecies are not studied well enough in Europe yet.It means that a lot of data exists concerning of P. aquilinum aggr.(Marrs and Watt 2006), however this information only partly describes biological and ecological peculiarities of its subspecies (Gureyeva and Page 2008).According to our field visual observations in Slovakia, habitats of P. a. subsp.pinetorum are coniferous or mixed forests mostly on sandy soils with the domination or co-domination of the Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) and their natural ecotones, but this subspecies can sometimes grow in an anthropogenic transformed places as forest slashes or roadsides.While our current focus is on planning and next conducting specialized studies on the ecologicalcoenotic peculiarities of P. a. subsp.pinetorum, our existing data align with information available from various regions of Europe (Page 1989, p. 19;Frank 2008;Vasheka and Bezsmertna 2012).At the same time, P. a. subsp.aquilinum mostly prefers open and wetter habitats: diverse deciduous forests (with the domination or codomination of Fagus sylvatica L., Betula pendula Roth., Quercus L. species etc.), meadows and their ecotones.However, cases of the joint growth of both Pteridium aquilinum subsp.aquilinum and P. a. subsp.pinetorum within the boundaries of the single biotope are already known (Bridges et al. 1998), although they have not yet been registered in Slovakia.This phenomenon is also observed for other closely related taxa of the Pteridium genus (Dosdall and David 2023).Nevertheless, the biology and ecology of the studied subspecies require additional careful research to detail them.
Images of the subspecies of Pteridium aquilinum in identification guides and floras.An intriguing aspect arises when examining how Pteridium aquilinum is depicted and labeled in scientific literature in Slovakia and some European countries.For instance, the "Flora of Slovakia" and the "Flora of the Czech Republic" present images of a typical P. a. subsp.pinetorum, but they are labeled simply as P. aquilinum (Futák et al. 1966;Hejný and Slavík 1997).A similar situation is observed in the "Ecoflora of Ukraine" (Didukh 2000).A photo of P. a. subsp.aquilinum is featured in an article about P. aquilinum in the "Red Data Book of Moldova" (Duca 2015).At the same time, a typical P. a. subsp.aquilinum is drawn at a Hungarian plant identification guide, but it is labeled simply as P. aquilinum (Király et al. 2011).It is also depicted and labeled in the Flora (Săvulescu 1952), as well as in the latest plant identification guide of Romania (Sârbu et al. 2013).A notable example is found in a periodical edition of the Excursion flora of Germany.A typical P. a. subsp.pinetorum was published there, but it was identified as P. aquilinum (Rothmaler et al. 1995).However, in a more recent edition (Jäger et al. 2017), separate pictures of both subspecies with correct identifications have been included.As well, there are some cases when only a part of a frond or a leaf of plants from the genus Pteridium is imagined in publications (Raciborski and Szafer 1919;Josifović 1970;Hess et al. 1976;Demiri 1983;Dostál and Červenka 1991).Such pictures or photos might be informative in the context of comparing with other genera of ferns, but they do not allow seeing significant differences among infraspecific taxa of P. aquilinum clearly.
Thus, this underscores the need for meticulous attention when preparing images of P. aquilinum and its subspecies for future editions of regional floras, lists of rare and protected plants, field guides, and similar publications, especially taking into account the information about ranges of the subspecies of P. aquilinum given below.
Ranges of the subspecies of Pteridium aquilinum.Taking into account the latest published data (Karlsson 2000;Thomson 2000;Tzvelev 2005Tzvelev , 2010;;Thomson et al. 2005;Gureyeva and Page 2008;Der et al. 2009;Parfenov 2009;Gureyeva 2011;Tzvelev and Geltman 2012;Zhou et al. 2014;Kurtto et al. 2019;Wolf et al. 2019) and our obtained results, it was established that P. a. subsp.aquilinum should now be classified as a European-West Asian subspecies, which was previously erroneously noted for Africa (Thomson et al. 2005).However, it is presumed to be absent in most of Fennoscandia and the Baltic countries, except for the southern parts of Norway and Sweden, as well as possibly Lithuania.The eastern boundary of the subspecies' distribution extends from the central regions of Belarus (Parfenov 2009;Tikhomirov 2009), through the western regions of Ukraine, including the Carpathians (Tzvelev 2005(Tzvelev , 2010; Tzvelev and Geltman 2012; Vasheka and Bezsmertna 2012), continuing through Moldova (Duca 2015), Romania and Bulgaria, avoiding steppe and forest-steppe areas (Fig. 5).It then extends to the north and northwest regions of Western Asia, covering Asia Minor, the Caucasus, and the Alborz.There is also an isolated fragment of its range within the Crimean Mountains (Tzvelev 2005(Tzvelev , 2010;;Tzvelev and Geltman 2012;Vasheka and Bezsmertna 2012).
The most part of P. a. subsp.pinetorum range is located in Forest and Steppe-Forest zones of Asian part of Russia, going a little into the eastern regions of Kazakhstan and the northern regions of Mongolia, until contact zones with P. a. subsp.japonicum (Nakai) Á.Löve & D.Löve and P. a. subsp.wightianum (Wall.ex J.Agardh) W.C.Shieh at Far East and in China (Tzvelev 2005(Tzvelev , 2010;;Gureyeva and Page 2008;Gureyeva 2011;Zhou et al. 2014;Wolf et al. 2019).The distribution of P. a. subsp.pinetorum is studied only fragmentary in Europe at present.The presence of this subspecies is confirmed on the territory of the British Isles, Scandinavian and Baltic countries, Germany, Switzerland, northern Italy, Poland, Belarus, Ukraine, as well as Forest and Forest-Steppe zones of European Russia, including some isolated localities at the northern slopes of the Great Caucasus (Page and Mill 1994;Karlsson 2000;Thomson 2004;Tzvelev 2005Tzvelev , 2010;;Gureyeva and Page 2008;Frank 2008;Tikhomirov 2009;Gureyeva 2011;Tzvelev and Geltman 2012;Vasheka and Bezsmertna 2012;Kurtto et al. 2019;Wolf et al. 2019;Zenkteler and Nowak 2019).Also, it presumably is presented in the flora of Austria and Liechtenstein (Frank 2008).In any way, the western and southern borders of P. a. subsp.pinetorum distribution stays still unclear.Results of our research allow drawing an indicative line describing the boundary of the range of the subspecies in Europe, although without any doubt it should be clarified after regional studies (Fig. 5).So, this border runs approximately between the Steppe and Forest-Steppe zones in Ukraine, then including the Carpathians crossing the Pannonian Basin to the Alps, and after that probably through northern Croatia and Slovenia (where this taxon has never previously been noted), northern Italy and Switzerland to Luxembourg and the Netherlands.Nevertheless, we have no confirmed data on the occurrence of P. a. subsp.pinetorum in France, Luxembourg and Belgium, except for information from several taxonomic databases as POWO (https:// powo.scien ce.kew.org/ taxon/ urn: lsid: ipni.org: names: 17565 260-1) and Euro+Med Plantbase (https:// www.europ lusmed.org/ cdm_ datap ortal/ taxon/ 46d92 9da-2995-4b6b-a8ba-250b1 b0a21 6c), so perhaps its western border might be run a little east to Germany.But, it has been found an evidence of the presence of P. a. subsp.pinetorum in the Netherlands: Nijmegen, písek v borových lesících (sand in pine forests), 31.V.1935, Leg.Ptý, SAV, Rev.: Pteridium pinetorum C.N. Page & R.R. Mill,12.10.2022,M. Peregrym.Also, herbarium samples from Austria, Czechia, Hungary and Romania which clearly confirm the growth of P. a. subsp.pinetorum in these countries were discovered during our study (Supplementary materials B).
Notes regarding taxon naming: P. aquilinum subsp.pinetorum It is important to explain why we use the name P. aquilinum subsp.pinetorum instead of P. aquilinum subsp.latiusculum.At least, this question appeared several times from your colleagues during the preparation of our manuscript.Therefore, this moment needs clear clarifications.Actually, we support A. Thomson's opinion (Thomson 2004) which is presently confirmed by latest molecular data (Zhou et al. 2014;Wolf et al. 2019).Namely, P. aquilinum subsp.latiusculum (Desv.)Hultér, described from Canada as Pteris latiuscula in 1827, is exclusively distributed within North America (Canada, USA, Mexico), therefore the using of this name for the European flora, in particular by Karlsson for the Flora Nordica (Karlsson 2000), was mistaken.Thus, this name is incorrectly to apply to European subspecies of Pteridium aquilinum.
However, there is one more name, P. aquilinum (L.) Kuhn subsp.latiusculum (Desv.)C.N. Page, which could be a priority one for the discussed taxon.But, it appeared as a new combination with a new, lower, rank from Pteris latiuscula (Page 1989), because the combination Pteridium aquilinum subsp.latiusculum (Desv.)Hultén was not accepted initially, because Hultén made no reference to the basionym (Thomson 2004).However, Hultén's combination became to consider valid later under the International Code of Botanical Nomenclature (Saint Louis Code) Arts 33.2 and 33.3 (as it was published before 1 January 1953) (Thomson Fig. 5 The borders of distribution of Pteridium aquilinum subsp.aquilinum ("---") and P. a. subsp.pinetorum ("-") in Europe 2004).Moreover, Page and Mill described P. pinetorum as a new species for science a little bit later, and P. aquilinum (L.) Kuhn subsp.latiusculum (Desv.)C.N. Page has already been specified as a synonym in its description (Page & Mill 1994).Therefore, Thomson had to offer a new combination for this taxon on the subspecies level in his revision of the genus Pteridium (Thomson 2004) to clearly distinguish subspecies of P. aquilinum in North America and Europe.That is why we consider P. aquilinum subsp.pinetorum as a most suitable name in the context of our research.
Infraspecific structure of P. aquilinum subsp.pinetorum.As noted above, the presently accepted subspecies, P. aquilinum subsp.pinetorum, has been considered in diverse taxonomic statuses and under different names in Eurasia earlier: as the mentioned one (Thomson 2004;Wolf et al. 2019), as P. pinetorum (Page and Mill 1994;Gureyeva and Page 2008;Tzvelev 2010;Tzvelev and Geltman 2012), as P. latiusculum (Tzvelev 2005), as P. aquilinum subsp.latiusculum (Page 1989;Karlsson 2000), as P. aquilinum subsp.japonicum (Zhou et al. 2014), and as others less significant in the context of the issue under discussion.Moreover, three subspecies of P. pinetorum have been described: P. p. subsp.pinetorum, P. p. subsp.sibiricum Gureeva et C.N. Page and P. p. subsp.sajanense Stepanov (Gureyeva andPage 2005, 2008;Stepanov 2012).The first one occurs in Europe, the second onein Siberia, and the last one locally meets in the Western Sayan Mountains (Gureyeva and Page 2008;Stepanov 2012).However, the relevancy of the description of P. p. subsp.sibiricum as a new subspecies caused controversy (Tzvelev 2010;Tzvelev and Geltman 2012).Nevertheless, taking into account the latest molecular data which have not confirmed the species' status of P. pinetorum (Thomson 2000(Thomson , 2004;;Der et al. 2009;Zhou et al. 2014;Wolf et al. 2019), and it is accepted as a subspecies of P. aquilinum today, consequently it is not correct to consider the mentioned infraspecific taxa on the level of subspecies of an unaccepted species.Therefore, we offer new taxonomic combinations for them as varieties: Pteridium aquilinum subsp.Considering the high morphological variability in Pteridium populations in the Western Sayan Mountains, as well as the presence of mixed populations of the mentioned intraspecific taxa without clear boundaries of their distribution (Tzvelev 2010;Stepanov 2012), such a taxonomic decision seems absolutely justified.

Conclusions
Thus, it is established that the genus Pteridium is represented by the single species with two subspecies in the flora of Europe, as well as in the flora of Slovakia: P. aquilinum subsp.aquilinum and P. a. subsp.pinetorum.Also, ranges of these subspecies were clarified, mentioning P. a. subsp.pinetorum for the Netherlands, Czechia, Slovakia, Austria, Hungary and Romania for the first time.Besides, new varieties are offered for two taxa from the Asian part of Russia.At the same time, our study shows that many questions according P. aquilinum taxa in Europe and Asia remain open.Additional field investigations and processing of herbarium collections should be carried out for detailed explorations of biological and ecological peculiarities of the mentioned subspecies, as well as for the clear understanding of their regional distribution.Such explorations also might become a basis for new syntaxonomic revisions, because P. aquilinum is a diagnostic species for many vegetation communities.Finally, our study underlines the importance of herbarium collections at the time when researchers cannot use a lot of literature data without checking the original specimens of plants.