Skip to main content
Download PDF

Association between APOE-ε4 allele and cognitive function is mediated by Alzheimer’s disease pathology: a population-based autopsy study in an admixed sample

Acta Neuropathologica Communications volume 11, Article number: 205 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Apolipoprotein E ε4 allele (APOE-ε4) is the main genetic risk factor for late-onset Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and may impact cognitive function also via other neuropathological lesions. However, there is limited evidence available from diverse populations, as APOE associations with dementia seem to differ by race. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the pathways linking APOE-ε4 to cognitive abilities through AD and non-AD neuropathology in an autopsy study with an admixed sample.

Methods

Neuropathological lesions were evaluated following international criteria using immunohistochemistry. Participants were classified into APOE-ε4 carriers (at least one ε4 allele) and non-carriers. Cognitive abilities were evaluated by the Clinical Dementia Rating Scale sum of boxes. Mediation analyses were conducted to assess the indirect association of APOE-ε4 with cognition through AD-pathology, lacunar infarcts, hyaline arteriosclerosis, cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA), Lewy body disease (LBD), and TAR DNA-binding protein 43 (TDP-43).

Results

We included 648 participants (mean age 75 ± 12 years old, mean education 4.4 ± 3.7 years, 52% women, 69% White, and 28% APOE-ε4 carriers). The association between APOE-ε4 and cognitive abilities was mediated by neurofibrillary tangles (β = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.45; 1.38, p < 0.001) and neuritic plaques (β = 1.36, 95% CI = 0.86; 1.96, p < 0.001). Lacunar infarcts, hyaline arteriosclerosis, CAA, LBD, and TDP-43 were not mediators in the pathway from APOE-ε4 to cognition.

Conclusion

The association between APOE-ε4 and cognitive abilities was partially mediated by AD-pathology. On the other hand, cerebrovascular lesions and other neurodegenerative diseases did not mediate the association between APOE-ε4 and cognition.

Introduction

The apolipoprotein E gene ε4 allele (APOE-ε4) is the main genetic risk factor for late-onset Alzheimer’s disease (AD) [1]. Compared to the APOE-ε3/ε3 genotype, having at least one APOE-ε4 allele increases the risk of cognitive decline and dementia [2,3,4]. According to previous evidence, the association of APOE-ε4 with cognition and dementia seems to be mediated by an increased burden of AD-pathology: neurofibrillary tangles (NFT) formed by hyperphosphorylated tau proteins and neuritic plaques (NP) composed of β-amyloid peptides [5,6,7]. However, the APOE alleles are also associated with a higher risk of cerebrovascular lesions, including atherosclerosis, brain infarcts, hyaline arteriosclerosis, and cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) [8,9,10]. In addition, APOE is related to non-AD neuropathological alterations, such as Lewy body dementia (LBD) characterized by aggregates of the α-synuclein protein and limbic-predominant age-related TAR DNA-binding protein 43 (TDP-43) encephalopathy [10,11,12,13,14,15]. Thus, these lesions could mediate the APOE association with cognitive function.

Few population-based studies have investigated these pathways through cerebrovascular lesions and non-AD neuropathology using causal mediation approaches, which estimate direct and indirect effects considering the interactions between the exposure and the mediator [16]. APOE-ε4 was related to an increased risk of hippocampal sclerosis mediated by the burden of TDP-43 pathology in an autopsy study with 1042 older adults [17]. In 17,244 participants from five longitudinal studies, the APOE-ε4 allele was associated with a higher AD risk through their indirect effects on increasing body mass index (BMI) [18]. Recently, it was demonstrated that the association of APOE-ε4 with lower late-life global cognitive scores was mediated by a higher burden of AD-pathology, as well as the presence of CAA, LBD, and TDP-43 in 1,671 participants, while cerebrovascular lesions were not mediators of the association between APOE alleles and cognitive function  [19].

Most studies so far included predominantly White participants with high educational attainment. However, studies suggested that the association between APOE-ε4 and cognition may differ by race, highlighting the need to understand the pathways through which APOE influences cognitive function in diverse populations [3, 4]. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the direct and indirect effects of neurodegenerative and cerebrovascular lesions on the association between APOE alleles and cognitive abilities by using data from a community-based sample of ethnically diverse participants.

Methods

Participants

We used data from the Biobank for Aging Studies of the University of Sao Paulo Medical School [20]. In Sao Paulo, individuals who die from a non-traumatic death of an unknown cause are submitted to an autopsy exam. Autopsies were performed at the Sao Paulo Autopsy Service, and the brains were donated by the deceased’s next of kin (NOK) [20, 21]. The NOK signed an informed consent allowing the brain collection and provided sociodemographic and clinical information about the deceased. The local ethics committee approved this study.

We included individuals aged 50 years or older at the time of death whose NOK had at least weekly contact with the deceased in the six months before death and with complete APOE data (n = 1151). Then, we excluded individuals with missing data for neuropathological variables (n = 482) and for sociodemographic and clinical information (n = 21). We analyzed data from 648 participants (Additional file 1: Fig. S1).

Neuropathological assessment

Brains were obtained within 24 h after death (mean post-mortem interval of 14.2 ± 4.8 h), and the brainstem and cerebellum were removed before further processing, after which the brain was separated into two hemispheres. Selected areas were collected from the right hemisphere and frozen at − 80 °C for future studies. The brainstem, left hemisphere of the brain, and the cerebellum were fixed in 4% buffered paraformaldehyde. The fixation time is 15 days, but in exceptional cases, this time can range from 15 to 45 days, based on the quality assessment of the brain fixation after 15 days by our neuropathologists. Then, the fixed hemisphere was sectioned into the following areas: middle frontal gyrus, middle and superior temporal gyri, angular gyrus, superior frontal and anterior cingulate gyrus, visual cortex, hippocampal formation at the level of the lateral geniculate body, amygdala, basal ganglia at the level of the anterior commissure, thalamus, midbrain, pons, medulla oblongata, and cerebellum [21]. All brain regions were embedded in paraffin, sectioned into 5-μm-thickness sections, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. To analyze the neuropathological lesions, we performed immunohistochemistry with antibodies against β-amyloid (4G8, 1:10.000; BioLegend #800,701), phosphorylated tau (AT8, 1:400; Invitrogen MN1020), TDP-43 (1:500, BioLegend #829,901), and α-synuclein (LB509, 1:500; Sigma-Aldrich MABN824) in the selected brain regions (Additional file 1: Table S1)  [20, 21].

AD-pathology was scored using the Braak and Braak staging system for NFT and the CERAD criteria for NP. The Braak and Braak staging is a system to measure the progression of NFT into six stages. The NFT changes start in the transentorhinal regions (stage I) and spread to the cornu ammonis (CA) 1 of the hippocampus (stage II). As the pathology progresses, the lesions extend to the subiculum, basal ganglia, and amygdala (stage III); and accumulate in the isocortex, mainly the temporal region (stage IV). Then, the lesions extend widely into the whole CA region, and the thalamus and hypothalamus are committed (stage V). Finally, the pathology reaches the occipital lobe and the fascia dentata of the hippocampus (stage VI) [22, 23]. According to these stages, NFT accumulation was categorized into 0-II, III-IV, or V-VI [24]. CERAD criterion is a semiquantitative approach that categorizes the frequency of neocortical NP into the following stages: none (0), sparse (I), moderate (II), and frequent (III) [25]. We categorized these frequencies into none or sparse, moderate, and frequent.

LBD was classified according to the presence of α-synuclein using the Braak staging for Parkinson's disease (PD) [26]. Therefore, we used the term LBD for all diseases related to Lewy bodies, such as PD, PD dementia, and Lewy body dementia. The diagnosis of LBD was considered when the Braak staging for PD ≥ III [21, 27]. The presence of TDP-43 was determined using immunostaining to detect TDP-43 in the hippocampal formation and amygdala.

Cerebrovascular lesions were evaluated microscopically using hematoxylin and eosin-stained slides in all sampled areas. Lacunar infarcts were registered by topography, stage, size, and number. The presence of lacunar infarcts was defined as one or more infarcts measuring ≤ 1.5 cm in any of the regions of the brain described above. Hyaline arteriosclerosis was classified according to the presence of moderate and/or severe microvascular changes in three or more cortical regions. The evaluation of CAA was made according to the localization, as well as the severity and presence of capillary amyloid deposition. CAA was classified as present when it was widespread in the parenchyma in at least three different cortical areas [21].

Cognitive assessment

Cognitive abilities were evaluated using the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) [28]. CDR is a semistructured interview that is applied to the informant and the participant. However, we used only the informant section of the CDR. The NOK, who had at least weekly contact with the deceased during the six months prior to death, answered questions regarding the cognitive abilities of the deceased three months before death to avoid the cognitive changes that are usually present next to the moment of death. Cognitive abilities were assessed in six domains (memory, orientation, judgment and problem-solving, community affairs, home, hobbies, and personal care). Each domain is scored on a five-point scale used to rate dementia severity: normal cognition (CDR = 0); cognitive impairment (CDR = 0.5); mild dementia (CDR = 1); moderate dementia (CDR = 2); and severe dementia (CDR = 3). The global CDR score is obtained through an algorithm [28]. We also computed the CDR sum of boxes (CDR-SOB), which is the sum of the scores in each domain that ranges from 0 to 18, with higher scores indicating worse cognitive abilities [29].

APOE Genotyping

DNA samples were obtained from blood or brain tissue. The APOE polymorphism was genotyped using either Illumina OmniExpress 700 k microarray or Illumina BeadXpress custom genotyping panel. APOE common alleles (ε2, ε3, and ε4) were genotyped directly by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using allele-specific amplification or after imputation of rs429358 to compose haplotypes [30].

Other variables

Other study variables were age at death, sex, education, and race, categorized as White, Black, Brown (admixed of Black and White), and Asian. Black and Brown participants were analyzed as Black. We also collected information on previous diagnoses of diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and heart disease (cardiac failure and/or coronary artery disease). The NOK reported all the sociodemographic and clinical variables except BMI, which was calculated using the measured height and weight before the autopsy exam. Physical activity was defined as present when the NOK reported that the deceased had regularly engaged in physical activities, such as household chores, walking, and practicing physical exercises. Smoking status and alcohol use were also reported by the NOK and classified as never, current, or former use. Age and sex were obtained from government-issued documents.

Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics were presented as mean and standard deviation (SD) for quantitative variables and relative frequencies for categorical variables. Participants were categorized into APOE-ε4 carriers and non-carriers according to the presence of at least one ε4 allele. Then, we compared the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of the two groups (APOE-ε4 carriers vs. non-carriers) using the unpaired t-test for quantitative variables and the Chi-squared or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables.

Estimates of the mediation models were calculated based on the product-of-coefficients method [16]. According to this approach, the direct effect represents the difference in the outcome when the exposure changes (APOE-ε4 carriers vs. non-carriers) and the mediator is held constant. The indirect effect represents the expected difference in the outcome when the mediator changes in the function of the values of the APOE categories (APOE-ε4 carriers vs. non-carriers) while the exposure (APOE categories) is held constant. In addition, the mediation model also estimated the total effect and the mediated proportion. The total effect is the effect of the APOE-ε4 on cognitive abilities, summing the direct and indirect effects. Mediated proportion represents the proportion of the total effect that is due to the APOE allele's effect on cognitive abilities through the mediators. [16, 31]

The causal mediation analysis was conducted using the ‘mediate’ function of the R package mediation [32]. First, we fitted the mediator and outcome models separately. In the mediator models, each of the mediators (lacunar infarcts, hyaline arteriosclerosis, CAA, TDP-43, LBD, Braak score, and CERAD score) was entered as the outcome variables, and the APOE categories as the predictor in a linear regression model adjusted for sociodemographic (age, sex, race, and education) and clinical factors (hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, heart disease, BMI, alcohol, smoking, and physical activity). In the outcome model, the CDR-SOB was the outcome variable, and the APOE categories and the mediators were predictors in a linear regression model adjusted for the set of confounders described above. Then, we entered these two models as arguments of the mediate function that decomposed the associations between APOE alleles and CDR-SOB into direct and indirect paths represented by the average direct effects (ADE) and the average causal mediation effects (ACME), respectively (Fig. 1). We verified the assumptions of the linear regression models, including normal quantile–quantile (Q–Q) plots and histograms of the residuals. In addition, the mediation effects were estimated with the default quasi-Bayesian Monte Carlo method and bootstrapping with 1000 simulations. We considered an alpha level of 5% in two-tailed tests.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Directed acyclic graph showing the conceptual causal mediation model of the associations between the apolipoprotein E gene ε4 allele (APOE-ε4) and cognitive abilities decomposed into a direct (blue line) and indirect pathway (red line). Confounder variables were age, sex, race, education, hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, heart disease, body mass index, alcohol use, smoking, and physical activity

Full size image

Results

In 648 participants, the mean age was 74.7 ± 12.0 years old, the mean education was 4.4 ± 3.7 years, 52% were women, and 69% were White. Subjects with at least one APOE-ε4 allele (n = 182) had fewer years of education (p = 0.01) and were more frequently Black (p = 0.001) than the APOE-ε4 non-carriers (n = 466) (Table 1).

Table 1 Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of the sample (n = 648)
Full size table

APOE-ε4 carriers had a higher frequency of cognitive impairment (CDR score ≥ 0.5) (Fig. 2A), higher scores of Braak staging for NFT (Fig. 2B) and CERAD score for NP (Fig. 2C), and a higher frequency of CAA (Fig. 2D) than APOE-ε4 non-carriers. However, no differences were found between the APOE groups for lacunar infarcts, hyaline arteriosclerosis, TDP-43, and LBD (Table 1).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Associations of the Apolipoprotein E gene ε4 allele (APOE-ε4) with Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) and neurodegenerative lesions. Compared to APOE ε4 non-carriers, APOE-ε4 carriers had A more cognitive impairment (CDR = 0.5) and probable dementia (CDR ≥ 1) (p < 0.001), B higher frequency of Braak staging ≥ III (p < 0.001), C moderate and frequent neuritic plaques (p < 0.001), and D cerebral amyloid angiopathy (p < 0.001). Chi-square tests were used for all comparisons

Full size image

Neuropathological lesions as mediators of the association between apolipoprotein E gene and cognitive abilities

Participants with the APOE-ε4 allele had higher CDR-SOB scores mediated by a higher burden of NFT (Braak score) and NP (CERAD score) in mediation analysis adjusted for age, sex, race, and education (Fig. 3, Panels A and B; Table 2). Forty percent and 62% of the association between APOE-ε4 and cognitive abilities were explained by the burden of NFT and NP measured respectively by Braak and CERAD scores. TDP-43, lacunar infarcts, hyaline arteriosclerosis, and CAA did not mediate the association between APOE-ε4 and cognitive abilities (Table 2). The direct pathway between APOE-ε4 and cognition remained significant in the presence of all mediators except TDP-43 (p = 0.07) and NP (p = 0.13), indicating that the APOE-ε4 allele can influence cognition through other paths independent of NFT, NP, TDP-43, lacunar infarcts, hyaline arteriosclerosis, and CAA (Table 2). Similar results were found in mediation analysis adjusted for sociodemographic and clinical factors (Additional file 1: Table S2).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Estimates (points) and 95% confidence intervals for the direct and indirect effects through neurodegenerative lesions of the association between Apolipoprotein E gene ε4 allele (APOE-ε4) and Clinical Dementia Rating sum of boxes (CDR-SOB). A The Braak staging for neurofibrillary tangles (NFT) and B the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer’s Disease (CERAD) criteria for neuritic plaques (NP) were significant mediators of the association between APOE-ε4 and cognitive abilities (p < 0.001). Direct paths remained significant in the model with the Braak score (p = 0.002) but were not significant when the CERAD score was entered as a mediator (p = 0.13)

Full size image
Table 2 Decomposition of the total, direct, and indirect effects through neurodegenerative and cerebrovascular lesions of the association between Apolipoprotein E gene ε4 allele (APOE-ε4) and cognitive abilities (n = 648)
Full size table

Discussion

In an admixed sample, NFT and NP mediated, respectively, 40% and 62% of the association between the presence of at least one APOE-ε4 allele and poor cognitive abilities. Cerebrovascular lesions and non-AD neuropathologies were not significant mediators on the pathway linking APOE-ε4 to cognitive abilities.

Our results agree with prior studies that have found an association of APOE-ε4 with increased β-amyloid pathology, tau neurotoxicity, and cognitive impairment. However, the majority of these studies did not use mediation approaches and included non-diverse populations [7, 19, 33, 34]. Results from 272 Koreans who underwent PET scans showed that APOE-ε4 carriers had an increased burden of β-amyloid in cortical regions and progressive accumulation of tau pathology in parietal, occipital, lateral, and medial temporal cortices than APOE-ε4 non-carriers [34]. In addition, the interaction between APOE-ε4 and higher levels of tau pathology evaluated by positron emission tomography was associated with memory impairment independently of the burden of β-amyloid in 297 participants without dementia from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) database [6]. In another study, the presence of APOE-ε4 and high levels of plasma p-tau 181 was associated with poor cognitive performance among 630 older individuals without dementia from the ADNI database, independent of the burden of β-amyloid pathology [7]. Moreover, having at least one APOE-ε4 allele was also associated with a high risk of AD in 267 Catholic sisters included in the Nun Study. In addition, the severity of NP and NFT included as covariates in the regression model were also independent predictors of AD. However, similarly to our findings, cerebrovascular risk factors, such as macro and microinfarcts and atherosclerosis in the Circle of Willis, were not significant predictors of cognitive impairment [5].

One prior study using mediation analysis to evaluate the indirect pathway from which APOE alleles impact late-life cognitive impairment via cerebrovascular lesions, AD-pathology, and non-AD neuropathologies was conducted using autopsy data from 1671 individuals who had a different sociodemographic profile compared to our sample (93.2% of APOE-ε4 carriers were White and had a mean education of 16.8 years). In this study, AD-pathology also mediated the association between APOE-ε4 and late-life cognitive impairment. In addition, the association between APOE-ε4 and cognition was also mediated through LBD, TDP-43, and CAA, but only among those with clinical dementia by the time of death. Cerebrovascular lesions were not significant mediators, and the protective effects of the APOE-ε2 allele against dementia were mediated only by the AD-pathology [19].

According to these findings from different populations, the APOE allele association with cognition is probably mainly via AD-pathology [5, 17, 18, 35, 36]. APOE-ε4 enhanced the burden of oligomeric β-amyloid at the synapse, which in turn is associated with synapse shrinking and loss, a known cause of the cognitive decline in AD [33]. Furthermore, APOE-ε4 has been related to reduced β-amyloid clearance and tau spreading [34, 36]. The clearance of β-amyloid from the brain is a critical process for maintaining cognitive function, and impairment of this process has been considered one of the main links between APOE-ε4 and AD [37]. However, recent data showed that an old woman with presenilin 1 mutation (PSEN1-E280A) and APOE3 Christchurch mutation in homozygosis had only mild cognitive impairment in the presence of a high burden of β-amyloid in the brain, but a very low level of tau pathology when compared with other cases with this presenilin mutation [38]. This finding brings doubt to the hypothesis of the significance of the relationship between reduced β-amyloid clearance in AD associated with APOE-ε4.

In addition, experimental studies with animals suggest that β-amyloid and tau are associated with blood vessel dysfunction and blood–brain-barrier (BBB) damage, which could facilitate the entrance of neurotoxic plasma-derived components into the brain [39]. In humans, BBB disruption is also related to cognitive dysfunction [40]. These mechanisms could explain the association between APOE-ε4 and worse cognitive abilities via the NFT and NP.

While our findings did not reveal an indirect association between APOE alleles and cognitive abilities via non-AD-related lesions, autopsy studies suggest that the APOE-ε4 allele is associated with an increased burden of α-synuclein, which is a pathological hallmark of LBD [41, 42]. One prior study also found an association between APOE and hippocampal sclerosis through TDP-43 [17, 18]. Future studies with larger samples will be important to confirm the underlying mechanisms linking APOE to cognition through these non-AD neuropathologies.

Although APOE alleles are related to lipid metabolism, atherosclerosis, inflammation processes, and oxidative stress, prior studies have not found mediation effects of cerebrovascular lesions on the relationship of APOE alleles with cognition, which is in line with our results [5, 19, 43, 44].

Finally, we need to consider some limitations of our study. Although we applied a causal mediation approach to evaluate the indirect and direct associations of APOE alleles with cognitive abilities, we used cross-sectional data unsuitable for causal inference. Longitudinal studies will be essential to confirm these causal pathways. Moreover, the frequency of APOE-ε2 alleles, as well as each of the six APOE genotypes (ε2/ε2, ε2/ε3, ε2/ε4, ε3/ε3, ε3/ε4, ε4/ε4), was small, which preclude the use of individual genotypes in our analysis. Also, we had missing data for TDP-43, which may have brought imprecision to these estimations due to the small sample size. Furthermore, we used a dichotomous classification for LBD, TDP-43, and cerebrovascular pathologies, while the NFT and NPs were classified as ordinal variables using established staging systems. Although the binary classifications for LBD, TDP-43, and cerebrovascular pathologies were based on their strong association with cognitive abilities, the absence of mediation effects between APOE and these lesions could be due to these dichotomous classifications. In addition, although our Biobank has implemented the ABC scoring system for the neuropathologic assessment of AD [45], most cases included in this study did not have this information.

On the other hand, we used autopsy material from an admixed sample of a low-to-middle-income country with many people with low educational attainment. Moreover, the Biobank for Aging Studies is the largest in Latin America, with a community-based sample with participants with different levels of dementia severity. These characteristics allowed us to compare our findings with previous results on less diverse and higher educated populations.

Conclusion

The association between the APOE-ε4 allele and cognitive abilities was mediated by the burden of NFT and NP, the hallmarks of AD. Non-AD neurodegenerative and cerebrovascular lesions did not mediate the pathway linking APOE to cognition. These findings shed light on pathological mechanisms that may explain the relationship between APOE-ε4, the main genetic risk factor for late-onset AD, and cognitive impairment in an ethnically diverse population and confirm previous results observed in other studies with mainly White participants. In addition, it provides evidence to support future disease-modifying drug development targeting APOE-ε4, which seems to modulate biological processes associated with key AD neuropathological markers.

References

  1. Bertram L, McQueen MB, Mullin K, Blacker D, Tanzi RE (2007) Systematic meta-analyses of Alzheimer disease genetic association studies: the AlzGene database. Nat Genet 39(1):17–23

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Corder EH, Saunders AM, Strittmatter WJ, Schmechel DE, Gaskell PC, Small GW, Roses AD, Haines JL, Pericak-Vance MA (1993) Gene dose of apolipoprotein E type 4 allele and the risk of alzheimer’s disease in late onset families. Science 261(5123):921–923

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sawyer K, Sachs-Ericsson N, Preacher KJ, Blazer DG (2009) Racial differences in the influence of the APOE epsilon 4 allele on cognitive decline in a sample of community-dwelling older adults. Gerontology 55(1):32–40

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Farrer LA, Cupples LA, Haines JL, Hyman B, Kukull WA, Mayeux R, Myers RH, Pericak-Vance MA, Risch N, van Duijn CM (1997) Effects of age, sex, and ethnicity on the association between apolipoprotein E genotype and Alzheimer disease. A meta-analysis APOE and alzheimer disease. Meta Analysis Consortium. JAMA 278(16):1349–1356

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mortimer JA, Snowdon DA, Markesbery WR (2009) The effect of APOE-ε4 on dementia is mediated by alzheimer neuropathology. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 23(2):152–157

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Weigand AJ, Thomas KR, Bangen KJ, Eglit GML, Delano-Wood L, Gilbert PE, Brickman AM, Bondi MW (2021) Alzheimer’s disease neuroimaging initiative APOE interacts with tau PET to influence memory independently of amyloid PET in older adults without dementia. Alzheimer’s Dementia: J Alzheimer’s Assoc 17(1):61–69

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang S, Ke S, Liu S, Wang E, Pan T, on the behalf of Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (2023) APOE ε4 status and plasma p-tau181 interact to influence cognitive performance among non-demented older adults. Neurosci Lett, 796:137052

  8. Lamar M, Yu L, Rubin LH, James BD, Barnes LL, Farfel JM, Gaiteri C, Buchman AS, Bennett DA, Schneider JA (2019) APOE genotypes as a risk factor for age-dependent accumulation of cerebrovascular disease in older adults. Alzheimer’s Dementia: J Alzheimer’s Associat 15(2):258–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yu L, Boyle PA, Nag S, Leurgans S, Buchman AS, Wilson RS, Arvanitakis Z, Farfel JM, De Jager PL, Bennett DA, Schneider JA (2015) APOE and cerebral amyloid angiopathy in community-dwelling older persons. Neurobiol Aging 36(11):2946–2953

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Schneider JA, Bienias JL, Wilson RS, Berry-Kravis E, Evans DA, Bennett DA (2005) The apolipoprotein E epsilon4 allele increases the odds of chronic cerebral infarction [corrected] detected at autopsy in older persons. Stroke 36(5):954–959

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fyfe I (2018) APOE*ε4 - a risk factor for TDP43 pathology? Nat Rev Neurol 14(10):570–571

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Jin Y, Li F, Sonoustoun B, Kondru NC, Martens YA, Qiao W, Heckman MG, Ikezu TC, Li Z, Burgess JD, Amerna D, O’Leary J, DeTure MA, Zhao J, McLean PJ et al (2022) APOE4 exacerbates α-synuclein seeding activity and contributes to neurotoxicity in Alzheimer’s disease with Lewy body pathology. Acta Neuropathol 143(6):641–662

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Jung JH, Jeon S, Baik K, Lee YH, Chung SJ, Yoo HS, Jeong SH, Sohn YH, Lee PH, Ye BS (2021) Apolipoprotein E4, amyloid, and cognition in Alzheimer’s and Lewy body disease. Neurobiol Aging 106:45–54

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Nelson PT, Pious NM, Jicha GA, Wilcock DM, Fardo DW, Estus S, Rebeck GW (2013) APOE-ε2 and APOE-ε4 correlate with increased amyloid accumulation in cerebral vasculature. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 72(7):708–715

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Itoh Y, Yamada M, Suematsu N, Matsushita M, Otomo E (1996) Influence of apolipoprotein E genotype on cerebral amyloid angiopathy in the elderly. Stroke 27(2):216–218

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. VanderWeele TJ (2016) Mediation analysis: a practitioner’s guide. Annu Rev Public Health 37:17–32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Yang H-S, Yu L, White CC, Chibnik LB, Chhatwal JP, Sperling RA, Bennett DA, Schneider JA, De Jager PL (2018) Evaluation of TDP-43 proteinopathy and hippocampal sclerosis in relation to APOE ε4 haplotype status: a community-based cohort study. The Lancet Neurol 17(9):773–781

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Loika Y, Feng F, Loiko E, Kulminski AM (2022) Mediation of the APOE associations with Alzheimer’s and coronary heart diseases through body mass index and lipids. GeroScience 44(2):1141–1156

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Nichols E, Brickman AM, Casaletto KB, Dams-O’Connor K, George KM, Kumar RG, Palta P, Rabin JS, Satizabal CL, Schneider J, Pa J, La Joie R (2023) AD and non-AD mediators of the pathway between the APOE genotype and cognition. Alzheimer’s Dement: J Alzheimer’s Assoc 19(6):2508–2519. https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.12885

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Grinberg LT, Ferretti RE de L, Farfel JM, Leite R, Pasqualucci CA, Rosemberg S, Nitrini R, Saldiva PHN, Filho WJ, Brazilian Aging Brain Study Group (2007) Brain bank of the Brazilian aging brain study group - a milestone reached and more than 1600 collected brains. Cell Tissue Banking, 8(2):151–162

  21. Suemoto CK, Ferretti-Rebustini REL, Rodriguez RD, Leite REP, Soterio L, Brucki SMD, Spera RR, Cippiciani TM, Farfel JM, Chiavegatto Filho A, Naslavsky MS, Zatz M, Pasqualucci CA, Jacob-Filho W, Nitrini R et al (2017) Neuropathological diagnoses and clinical correlates in older adults in Brazil: a cross-sectional study. PLoS Med 14(3):e1002267

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Braak H, Braak E (1991) Neuropathological stageing of Alzheimer-related changes. Acta Neuropathol 82(4):239–259

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Braak H, Alafuzoff I, Arzberger T, Kretzschmar H, Del Tredici K (2006) Staging of Alzheimer disease-associated neurofibrillary pathology using paraffin sections and immunocytochemistry. Acta Neuropathol 112(4):389–404

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Murayama S, Saito Y (2004) Neuropathological diagnostic criteria for Alzheimer’s disease. Neuropathology 24(3):254–260

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Mirra SS, Heyman A, McKeel D, Sumi SM, Crain BJ, Brownlee LM, Vogel FS, Hughes JP, van Belle G, Berg L (1991) The consortium to establish a registry for Alzheimer’s disease (CERAD). Part II. Standardization of the neuropathologic assessment of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology. 41(4):479–486

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Braak H, Del Tredici K, Rüb U, de Vos RAI, Jansen Steur ENH, Braak E (2003) Staging of brain pathology related to sporadic Parkinson’s disease. Neurobiol Aging 24(2):197–211

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Jellinger KA (2008) A critical reappraisal of current staging of Lewy-related pathology in human brain. Acta Neuropathol 116(1):1–16

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Morris JC (1993) The clinical dementia rating (CDR): current version and scoring rules. Neurology 43(11):2412–2414

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. O’Bryant SE, Waring SC, Cullum CM, Hall J, Lacritz L, Massman PJ, Lupo PJ, Reisch JS, Doody R (2008) Staging dementia using clinical dementia rating scale sum of boxes scores. Arch Neurol 65(8):1091–1095

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Naslavsky MS, Suemoto CK, Brito LA, Scliar MO, Ferretti-Rebustini RE, Rodriguez RD, Leite REP, Araujo NM, Borda V, Tarazona-Santos E, Jacob-Filho W, Pasqualucci C, Nitrini R, Yaffe K, Zatz M et al (2022) Global and local ancestry modulate APOE association with Alzheimer’s neuropathology and cognitive outcomes in an admixed sample. Mol Psychiatry 27(11):4800–4808

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Lee H, Cashin AG, Lamb SE, Hopewell S, Vansteelandt S, VanderWeele TJ, MacKinnon DP, Mansell G, Collins GS, Golub RM, McAuley JH, AGReMA group (2021) A Guideline for Reporting Mediation Analyses of Randomized Trials and Observational Studies: The AGReMA Statement. JAMA, 326(11):1045–1056.

  32. Tingley D, Yamamoto T, Hirose K, Keele L, Imai K (2014) Mediation: R package for causal mediation analysis. J Stat Softw 59(1):1–38

    Google Scholar 

  33. Koffie RM, Hashimoto T, Tai H-C, Kay KR, Serrano-Pozo A, Joyner D, Hou S, Kopeikina KJ, Frosch MP, Lee VM, Holtzman DM, Hyman BT, Spires-Jones TL (2012) Apolipoprotein E4 effects in Alzheimer’s disease are mediated by synaptotoxic oligomeric amyloid-β. Brain 135(7):2155–2168

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Baek MS, Cho H, Lee HS, Lee JH, Ryu YH, Lyoo CH (2020) Effect of APOE ε4 genotype on amyloid-β and tau accumulation in Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimer’s Res Therapy 12(1):140

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Gavett BE, John SE, Gurnani AS, Bussell CA, Saurman JL (2016) The role of alzheimer’s and cerebrovascular pathology in mediating the effects of age, race, and apolipoprotein E genotype on dementia severity in pathologically-confirmed alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimer’s Disease: JAD 49(2):531–545

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Hanseeuw BJ, Betensky RA, Jacobs HIL, Schultz AP, Sepulcre J, Becker JA, Cosio DMO, Farrell M, Quiroz YT, Mormino EC, Buckley RF, Papp KV, Amariglio RA, Dewachter I, Ivanoiu A et al (2019) Association of amyloid and tau with cognition in preclinical alzheimer disease: a longitudinal study. JAMA Neurol 76(8):915–924

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Cai W, Wu T, Chen N (2023) The amyloid-beta clearance: from molecular targets to glial and neural cells. Biomolecules 13(2):313

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Arboleda-Velasquez JF, Lopera F, O’Hare M, Delgado-Tirado S, Marino C, Chmielewska N, Saez-Torres KL, Amarnani D, Schultz AP, Sperling RA, Leyton-Cifuentes D, Chen K, Baena A, Aguillon D, Rios-Romenets S et al (2019) Resistance to autosomal dominant Alzheimer’s disease in an APOE3 christchurch homozygote: a case report. Nat Med 25(11):1680–1683

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Montagne A, Zhao Z, Zlokovic BV (2017) Alzheimer’s disease: a matter of blood-brain barrier dysfunction? J Exp Med 214(11):3151–3169

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Nation DA, Sweeney MD, Montagne A, Sagare AP, D’Orazio LM, Pachicano M, Sepehrband F, Nelson AR, Buennagel DP, Harrington MG, Benzinger TLS, Fagan AM, Ringman JM, Schneider LS, Morris JC et al (2019) Blood–brain barrier breakdown is an early biomarker of human cognitive dysfunction. Nat Med 25(2):270–276

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Ruffmann C, Calboli FCF, Bravi I, Gveric D, Curry LK, de Smith A, Pavlou S, Buxton JL, Blakemore AIF, Takousis P, Molloy S, Piccini P, Dexter DT, Roncaroli F, Gentleman SM et al (2016) Cortical Lewy bodies and Aβ burden are associated with prevalence and timing of dementia in Lewy body diseases. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 42(5):436–450

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Davis AA, Inman CE, Wargel ZM, Dube U, Freeberg BM, Galluppi A, Haines JN, Dhavale DD, Miller R, Choudhury FA, Sullivan PM, Cruchaga C, Perlmutter JS, Ulrich JD, Benitez BA et al (2021) APOE genotype regulates pathology and disease progression in synucleinopathy. Science Translational Medicine. 12(529):eaay3069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Eichner JE, Dunn ST, Perveen G, Thompson DM, Stewart KE, Stroehla BC (2002) Apolipoprotein E polymorphism and cardiovascular disease: a huge review. Am J Epidemiol 155(6):487–495

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Riddell DR, Graham A, Owen JS (1997) Apolipoprotein E inhibits platelet aggregation through the L-arginine: nitric oxide pathway implications for vascular disease. J Biol Chem. 272(1):89–95

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Montine TJ, Phelps CH, Beach TG, Bigio EH, Cairns NJ, Dickson DW, Duyckaerts C, Frosch MP, Masliah E, Mirra SS, Nelson PT, Schneider JA, Thal DR, Trojanowski JQ, Vinters HV et al (2012) National institute on aging-Alzheimer’s association guidelines for the neuropathologic assessment of Alzheimer’s disease: a practical approach. Acta Neuropathol 123(1):1–11

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The article was funded by University of Sao Paulo–PIPAE,2021.1.10424.1.9, Regina Silva Paradela, Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo,06/55318-1, Claudia Kimie Suemoto,09/09134-4,Claudia Kimie Suemoto,16/24326-0, Claudia Kimie Suemoto, Alzheimer’s Association, AARG-20-678884, Claudia Kimie Suemoto, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, Level 2 research productivity grant, Claudia Kimie Suemoto.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Geriatrics, University of São Paulo Medical School, 455 Doutor Arnaldo Avenue, room 1355, São Paulo, SP, Brazil

    Regina Silva Paradela, Alberto Fernando Oliveira Justo, Wilson Jacob-Filho & Claudia Kimie Suemoto

  2. Department of Pathology, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil

    Vítor Ribeiro Paes, Renata E. P. Leite & Carlos A. Pasqualucci

  3. Memory and Aging Center, University of California, San Francisco, USA

    Lea T. Grinberg

  4. Human Genome and Stem Cell Center, Biosciences Institute, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

    Michel Satya Naslavsky & Mayana Zatz

  5. Department of Neurology, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil

    Ricardo Nitrini

Authors
  1. Regina Silva Paradela
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alberto Fernando Oliveira Justo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Vítor Ribeiro Paes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Renata E. P. Leite
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Carlos A. Pasqualucci
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Lea T. Grinberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Michel Satya Naslavsky
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Mayana Zatz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Ricardo Nitrini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Wilson Jacob-Filho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Claudia Kimie Suemoto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

RSP: study concept and design, analysis, interpretations of data, and manuscript drafting. AOJ: interpretations of data, manuscript drafting, and critical revision of the manuscript for intellectual content. VPB: acquisition of the data and critical revision of the manuscript for intellectual content. RPL: critical revision of the manuscript for intellectual content. CAP: critical revision of the manuscript for intellectual content. LTG: critical revision of the manuscript for intellectual content. MSN: critical revision of the manuscript for intellectual content. MZ: critical revision of the manuscript for intellectual content. RN: critical revision of the manuscript for intellectual content. WJF: critical revision of the manuscript for intellectual content. CKS: study concept and design, interpretations of data, critical revision of the manuscript for intellectual content, and study supervision.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Regina Silva Paradela.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

None.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Fig 1.

Flowchart of the study participants. Table 1. Brain tissue staining protocol of the Biobank for Aging Studies. Table 2. Decomposition of the total, direct, and indirect effects through neurodegenerative and cerebrovascular lesions of the association between Apolipoprotein E gene ε4 allele (APOE-ε4) and cognitive abilities (n = 648).

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Paradela, R.S., Justo, A.F.O., Paes, V.R. et al. Association between APOE-ε4 allele and cognitive function is mediated by Alzheimer’s disease pathology: a population-based autopsy study in an admixed sample. acta neuropathol commun 11, 205 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40478-023-01681-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40478-023-01681-z

Keywords

Acta Neuropathologica Communications

ISSN: 2051-5960

Contact us