Skip to main content
Download PDF

Review immune response of targeting CD39 in cancer

Biomarker Research volume 11, Article number: 63 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

The ATP-adenosine pathway has emerged as a promising target for cancer therapy, but challenges remain in achieving effective tumor control. Early research focused on blocking the adenosine generating enzyme CD73 and the adenosine receptors A2AR or A2BR in cancer. However, recent studies have shown that targeting CD39, the rate-limiting ecto-enzyme of the ATP-adenosine pathway, can provide more profound anti-tumor efficacy by reducing immune-suppressive adenosine accumulation and increasing pro-inflammatory ATP levels. In addition, combining CD39 blocking antibody with PD-1 immune checkpoint therapy may have synergistic anti-tumor effects and improve patient survival. This review will discuss the immune components that respond to CD39 targeting in the tumor microenvironment. Targeting CD39 in cancer has been shown to not only decrease adenosine levels in the tumor microenvironment (TME), but also increase ATP levels. Additionally, targeting CD39 can limit the function of Treg cells, which are known to express high levels of CD39. With phase I clinical trials of CD39 targeting currently underway, further understanding and rational design of this approach for cancer therapy are expected.

Introduction of adenosine pathway in cancer

Adenosine is a key effector molecule that regulates both innate and adaptive immunity. Adenosine functions through type 1 purinergic receptors (A1, A2A, A2B, and A3), which belong to G protein coupled receptors (GPCR) [1]. A1 and A3 receptors inhibit adenylate cyclase and cAMP production, and thus promote immune cell activity. In contrast, A2A and A2B receptors, which are abundantly expressed in various immune cells, such as myeloid cells and lymphocytes, are associated with immunosuppression by triggering intracellular cAMP accumulation. A1 and A2A receptors have high affinity to adenosine and play a dominant role in physiological conditions, while A2B and A3 receptors have low adenosine affinity and are critical in some pathological conditions such as malignancies [2,3,4,5,6]. Adenosine can be generated by adenosine triphosphate (ATP) through the CD39/CD73 pathway, which is particularly prevalent in the tumor microenvironment (TME) [6,7,8,9]. The major energy currency ATP, under normal or physiological conditions, is mainly located inside the cell, with a concentration of about 1 ~ 10 mM, while the extracellular ATP (eATP) concentration is at a very low level (10 ~ 100 nM). However, in the TME, eATP can be released by stressed or dying cells and provides inflammatory signals that are critical for effective innate and adaptive immune responses [10,11,12]. The hypoxia and inflammatory environment in tumors also can induce the expression of CD39 and CD73, two key ecto-enzymes in the ATP-adenosine pathway [13,14,15]. CD39 converts eATP to adenosine diphosphate (ADP) and adenosine monophosphate (AMP), whereas CD73 hydrolyzes AMP into adenosine. Hence, adenosine can be upregulated from low levels (around 1 µM) under normal conditions to high levels (> 100 µM) in the TME, resulting in an immune-suppressive environment and promoting tumor development [10, 16]. Alternative pathways such as CD38/CD203a/CD73 and ALP also can produce adenosine in the TME from NAD+ and ATP, respectively. There are currently studies suggesting that this non-canonical adenosine-generating pathway may also play an important role in cancer [17,18,19]. It is worth mentioning that the ENPP1-CD73 pathway as an alternative adenosinergic loop that could allow cancer cells to evade CD39-targeted therapeutics. However, the CD39/CD73 pathway is considered to be the major source of adenosine in the TME (Fig. 1) [1, 5, 6, 10].

Fig. 1
figure 1

ATP-ADO pathway. The ATP-ADO pathway is critical in regulating immune responses in the tumor microenvironment. Two primary pathways are involved in generating adenosine (ADO): the CD39/CD73 pathway and the CD38/CD203a/CD73 pathway. In the CD39/CD73 pathway, CD39 degrades ATP into ADP and AMP, which is further degraded into ADO by CD73. In the alternative CD38/CD203a/CD73 pathway, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+) is sequentially degraded into ADPR, AMP, and ADO. Adenosine binds to adenosine receptors (i.e., A2AR and A2BR) and inhibits immune cell activation. Additionally, adenosine aminohydrolase (ADA) can convert ADO into inosine. Furthermore, the CD39/CD73 pathway is the predominant mechanism for ADO generation in the TME, and targeting CD39 has emerged as a promising strategy for cancer therapy

Full size image

CD39, as well as the downstream molecules of the ATP-adenosine pathway, such as CD73 and A2AR/A2BR, play critical roles in tumor growth. Their expression is usually elevated in the tumor components, including tumor cells and immune cells, and is associated with poor prognosis in several malignancies. Consequently, several clinical trials are being conducted to target the adenosine pathway for cancer treatment [7, 10, 14, 15]. CD73 and adenosine receptors were the primary targets focused by researchers [8, 20,21,22]. Recent clinical advances in CD73 blocking antibodies or antagonists and inhibitors of A2AR and A2BR have demonstrated the therapeutic potentials of modulating the adenosine pathway in cancer [8, 20, 23,24,25]. Targeting CD39 is also promising in cancer, with a general anti-tumor mechanism that rely not only on preventing the immune-suppressive adenosine level but also on the stabilization and accumulation of pro-inflammatory eATP to restore anti-tumor immunity. Blocking antibodies targeting CD39 are now being investigated for tumor control in clinical trials [10, 26,27,28]. Further understanding of the detailed mechanisms of action of CD39 antagonists, in particular how the immune components responding to CD39 blocking antibody, is now a priority for rational design of targeting CD39 in cancer [10].

CD39 in tumor

CD39 is an ectonucleoside triphosphate diphosphohydrolases (encoded by ENTPD1 gene) and a member of the NTPDase family comprising of four cell-surface members (NTPDase1,2,3 and 8), and NTPDase4,5,6 and 7 being expressed as intracellular enzymes [29, 30]. With the ability to regulate purine metabolism, all the family members, especially CD39, CD73, ENPP1 (also known as CD203a), and CD38, are potential tumor immunotherapy targets [12, 31,32,33].

Human CD39 is a 510-amino-acid protein with 7 N-glycosylation sites and 11 cysteine residues. Structurally, CD39 includes two transmembrane domains, a small cytoplasmic domain, as well as a large extracellular region enriched with hydrophobic residues. The cytoplasmic domain has both N-terminal and C-terminal sections, whereas the extracellular domain contains five ATPase conserved areas [31].

Although CD39 is primarily characterized as an Ecto-(Ca2+, Mg2+)-apyrase [34], it is also a Treg cell marker and is widely expressed in a variety of tissues and organs, particularly in endothelial cells, fibroblasts and numerous subsets of immune cells, including B cells, Treg cells, macrophages, and effector T cells [10, 13, 31, 35]. CD39, CD73 and adenosine receptors are upregulated in pathological and physiological conditions such as tissue growth, tissue damage, tissue remodeling and hypoxia [26, 36,37,38]. In addition, CD39 is also upregulated in response to chronic inflammation (e.g., tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), interleukin (IL)-6, IL-27, and T cell exhaustion) [10, 39, 40]. Moreover, oxidative stress and aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) have been demonstrated to upregulate CD39, which governs the function of tumor-associated macrophages [41].

CD39 expression is increased in various human tumors, including melanoma, colon cancer, ovarian cancer, pancreatic cancer, kidney cancer, lung cancer, thyroid cancer, testicular cancer, sarcoma, lymphoma, and chronic lymphocytic leukemia [42,43,44,45,46]. In the TME, CD39 expression is enriched in vascular endothelial cell, fibroblasts, myeloid cells, T regulatory cells (Tregs), tumor-specific T effector cells and NK cells (Fig. 2) [10, 12, 31]. In very rare circumstances, tumor cells can overexpress CD39 compared with neighboring normal tissues and cells [26, 47]. CD73 is also increased in human tumors, with frequent expression on tumor cells, endothelial cells, fibroblasts, and myeloid cells. Therefore, conversation from pro-inflammatory ATP to immune-suppressive adenosine is active in the TME due to increased expression of CD39 and CD73 in non-immune cells, immune cells, and tumor cells [14, 16, 48]. We will discuss the expression and function of CD39 in immune cells in the TME and how the immune cells respond to CD39 antagonists used to treat cancer in details in the sections below.

Fig. 2
figure 2

CD39 expression in immune cells under different conditions. In normal peripheral blood cells, CD39 is primarily expressed on T regulatory cells (Tregs), myeloid cells, and B cells. However, in the tumor microenvironment (TME), CD39 expression is upregulated in most immune cell populations, including myeloid cells, Tregs, T cells, and NK cells. This increase in CD39 expression leads to the generation of an immunosuppressive microenvironment with high levels of adenosine, which can inhibit immune cell function and promote tumor growth

Full size image

CD39 and myeloid cells

Macrophages

Macrophages co-express CD39 and P2 × 7, the eATP receptor [10, 26]. In the TME, macrophages secrete, hydrolyze, and respond to eATP via increasing expression of CD39 upon P2 × 7 activation [12, 49,50,51]. Consequently, blocking CD39 ATPase activity with antibody or inhibitor on macrophages dramatically boosts their production of IL-12 and TNF-α, while significantly lowering IL-10 secretion. In the LPS-induced sepsis mouse model, CD39-deficient mice consistently have increased levels of inflammatory cytokines. By contrast, suppressing macrophage -expressed P2 × 7 alleviates inflammatory cytokines production [52]. Therefore, CD39 could act as a “molecular switch”, that limits the balance of inflammatory and regulatory macrophage differentiation [10, 12, 31].

ATP released by dead or dying cells in the TME represents a “find me” signal, promoting the chemotaxis of macrophages, monocytes, and neutrophils. Despite the accumulation of extracellular ATP surrounding the cell surface enhances chemotactic signals by triggering P2Y2 receptors, sufficient exogenous ATP has been shown to block chemotaxis of macrophages, indicating that the chemotaxis process of macrophages is governed by eATP gradients [10, 31, 48, 53].

Increased eATP also stimulates macrophage phagocytosis via activation of P2 × 4 and P2 × 7 receptors [54]. In addition, increased levels of eATP lead to increased release of microvesicle from macrophages and monocytes, a major secretory pathway for rapid production of IL-1β and IL-18 which is mediated by P2 × 7 activation [26]. Moreover, microvesicles released from macrophages activate unprimed macrophages partially dependent on TLR4, inducing expression of costimulatory molecules CD80, CD86 and MHC class II, which in turn increases secretion of TNF-α from other macrophages [10, 12, 54].

Extracellular ATP is unstable in the TME and can be hydrolyzed immediately to adenosine by upregulated CD39 and CD73 in macrophages and other cells. It is well documented that adenosine directly suppresses macrophages by signaling through adenosine receptors, which suppresses macrophage differentiation and maturation, reduces expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines, and increases expression of immune-suppressive molecules, such as VEGF, arginase 1 and IL-10 [4,5,6, 55]. Hence, macrophages are potential positive responders for CD39 targeting by reversing their immune suppressive functions to immune activation components in cancer [26].

Myeloid-derived suppressor cells

Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC) are accumulated in the TME and have been identified as a key player in the immune evasion mechanism of cancer cells [10]. CD39- and CD73-expressing MDSCs, which are induced by TGFβ and HIF1α, are often associated with tumor stage, node involvement and metastatic status within non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and colon cancer [56, 57]. MDSCs and CD39 expression on CD8+ T cells, in particular, predict the efficacy of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) in patients with advanced NSCLC [57]. Consistently, tumor -associated MDSCs with high levels expression of CD73, CD39 and PD-L1 are characteristics of increased immunosuppressive activity ex vivo than myeloid cells circulating in peripheral blood [10, 12].

Neutrophils

CD39 is also abundant in neutrophils. In mice, injection of ATP promotes neutrophil recruitment through a caspase-1/11-dependent mechanism. Consequently, CD39 hydrolyzes ATP and activate adenosine receptors to promote neutrophil chemotaxis [58]. However, controversial findings have demonstrated that LPS injection led to increased neutrophil trafficking to the lungs absence of CD39 [59]. In addition, non-hydrolysable ATP inhibits neutrophil chemotaxis, whereas exogenous hydrolysable ATP stimulates neutrophil chemotaxis [5, 10, 60]. Overall, these findings suggest that blocking CD39 may prevent neutrophil chemotaxis when neutrophils migrate to ATP-rich areas.

CD39 and T cells

CD4+ T cells

FOXP3+ Treg cells, an immune-suppressive CD4+ T cell subset with high CD39 expression, modulate immune activities through a variety of mechanisms, including the CD39-dependent production of adenosine [61,62,63,64]. CD39 represents a suppressive function marker in Treg cells. According to the data from CD39-deficient mice, Treg cells rely on CD39 for the suppressive activities in vitro and in vivo [31, 64, 65]. Consistently, CD39 expression on Treg cells restricts experimental colitis model induced by T cell transplantation [66]. Furthermore, in tumor metastasis models, CD39+ Treg cells in mice potently inhibit NK cell -mediated anti-tumor immunity [64, 67]. Human colon cancer -derived CD39+ Treg cells also suppress IFN-γ production and the in vitro proliferation of conventional T cells [67, 68].

Adenosine-stimulated signals may raise intracellular cAMP levels, leading to trans activation of ENTPD1 promoter, and thereby boosting and stabilizing the expression of CD39 in Treg cells. A decrease in the number of CD39+ Foxp3+ Tregs was observed in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), indicating the importance of CD39 expression in Tregs in the management of inflammatory autoimmune diseases [69]. In contrast, circulating CD39+ CD25+ Treg levels increased in cancer patients, while low levels of CD39+ Tregs were associated with improved recurrence-free survival in melanoma patients [70]. In addition, the elevated levels of CD39 in tumor infiltrating Treg cells are usually accompanied by elevated levels of other inhibition/activation markers (i.e., PD-1, CTLA-4 and OX40) [49]. All these observations suggest that CD39, by stabilizing FOXP3+ Tregs, plays a key role in Treg-mediated tumor immunosuppressive response.

Type 1 regulatory T (TR1) cells, a second CD4+ subtype of regulatory lymphocytes, are induced from CD4+ T cells upon exposure to IL-27 [71]. TR1 cells, characterized by IL-10 production and the expression of LAG3 and CD49b, also utilize CD39 for immunosuppression [72, 73]. Interestingly, TR1 cells induced with IL-27 do not express CD73, implying that TR1 cells require the synthesis of adenosine in conjunction with CD73 expressed by other immune components such as effector T cells and DCs [53, 72]. Importantly, TR1 cells, which are FOXP3–, can be induced in the TME with a CD39-dependent manner. It is reported that eATP inhibits TR1 cell differentiation, whereas CD39 mediates TR1 suppressive activity via adenosine, indicating that TR1 could be a potential target for CD39 blocking therapy in cancer [72].

Th17 cells are significant drivers of chronic inflammation because they regulate autoimmunity and commensal microorganisms in the gut. Interestingly, CD39 expression confers suppressive function of Th17 cells via ATPase activity and related increased IL-10 production. In cancer patients, Th17 cells expressing CD39 can be used to predict poor clinical outcome. Th17 cells with low levels of CD39 and CD73, which generated in the absence of TGFβ, are endowed with anti-tumor functions [10, 12, 74].

CD39 is also upregulated in conventional CD4+ T cells in the TME, which have been shown correlated with impaired anti-tumor activity [43, 64, 75]. Consistently, silencing CD39 and/or CD73 increased anti-tumor activity of human CD4+ T cells against ovarian cancer cells. Furthermore, CD39 contributes to apoptosis of CD4+ T cells in vitro. CD39 expression is also increased in T cells during ageing [10].

CD8+ T cells

CD39 is a checkpoint and exhaustion marker in CD8+ T cells [76,77,78,79]. Evidences showed that tumor-reactive CD39+CD8+ T cells isolated from human malignancies exhibit exhaustion phenotypes, including decreased production of IFN-γ, IL-2 and TNF-α and overexpression of several checkpoint receptors such as PD1, TIM3, LAG3, TIGIT and 2B4 [10]. Similar findings have been reported in lung cancer, colorectal cancer, head and neck cancer, breast cancer and liver cancer [36, 38, 76, 79]. In addition, CD39+ CD8+ T cells could also be detected in metastases of lymph nodes and other tissues [80]. Triggering T cell receptor alone induces CD39 expression on CD8+ T cells in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) breast cancer patients [10, 31]. Further evidence also revealed that clinical responses to ICB therapy was accompanied by accumulation of the CD39+CD8+ T cell population in the blood [81]. Besides tumor, chronic viral stimulation has also been linked to CD39 upregulation in CD8+ T cells [10, 82].

However, some studies suggest that CD8+ T cells expressing CD39 have regulatory functions [31, 83]. For example, CD39 has been found to be involved in regulating the inhibitory ability of tumor invasive CD8+ Tregs, and the isolated CD39+CD8+ T cells can indeed limit T cell proliferation in vitro [77]. In addition, CD39 antagonist significantly reduced the inhibitory ability of CD8+ Tregs, highlighting its key role in mediating inhibitory function, which also applies to CD4+ Tregs [65, 84]. These data suggest that antigen-induced CD39 upregulation activates the internal inhibitory function of CD8+ Treg cells, which helps to limits excessive immunopathological response. This regulatory mechanism could be beneficial in the situations where an overwhelming immune response is undesirable, such as following the recovery of infection. On the contrary, it can have a negative impact under tumor conditions by providing tumor-specific CD39+CD8+ T cells with inhibitory abilities [37, 38, 76, 80].

At present, little is known about the mechanism of the upregulation of CD39 in CD8+ T cells under specific circumstances [31]. Compared with circulating cells, the expression of CD39 in tumor-infiltrating CD8+ T cells increased significantly, suggesting that special factors in TME may be responsible for the rise in CD39 level [37, 80]. Cytokines such as IL-6 and TGF-β may contribute to the CD39 upregulation in tumor-infiltrating CD8+ T cells [10]. Expression of CD39 on long-lived memory CD8+ T cell subsets may have distinct cellular metabolic profiles and promotes survival [77]. Furthermore, eATP/CD39 can modulate mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) activation which regulates stress resistance and organism longevity [46, 85]. Hence, it is feasible that regulation of the CD39 pathway and purinergic signaling will affect T cell survival [53].

Based on the expression and function of CD39 on T cell memory and exhaustion, these findings imply that targeting CD39 might represent a novel strategy for the treatment of cancer [10].

CD39 and NK cells

CD39 expression is at low level in NK cells [20, 21, 68, 86]. However, CD39 and CD73 are upregulated in lung tumor-infiltrating NK cells [9, 86]. CD39-mediated immune-suppression of NK cells has recently been reported in various tumor metastasis models. First evidence was shown by utilizing the CD39 inhibitor sodium polyoxotungstate (POM1). The anti-metastatic activity of POM1 was completely dependent on the presence of NK cells and CD39 expressed by hematopoietic cells. There is also observed remarkable decrease in experimental lung metastases in CD39-deficient mice compared with WT mice, with mechanisms of NK cells and IFN-γ-dependent manner. Although adenosine can directly suppress NK cells, it cannot rule out an indirect mechanism involving NK/myeloid cell crosstalk which could also affect NK cell function in tumor settings [86].

A monoclonal antibody specific to CD39 that blocks ecto-enzyme CD39 can suppress both experimental and spontaneous metastases in mice. Furthermore, the CD39-targeting monoclonal antibody show higher antimetastatic activity than the CD39 inhibitor POM1 and antagonists that block other members of the adenosinergic family (e.g., CD73 and A2AR). The CD39-targeting monoclonal antibody relied on myeloid cell -expressed CD39 and NK cell effector function to control metastases, while NK cell CD39 expression was not required [9].

Targeting CD39 in cancer (Mechanisms of action)

Targeting adenosine pathway has shown tremendous promise for tumor immunotherapy [7, 11, 87,88,89]. In the last decade, numerous studies have revealed that antagonists that block the direct adenosine-generating enzyme CD73 and the adenosine receptors A2AR or A2BR in cancer have a strong anti-tumor effect by restricting the adenosine-induced immune-suppressive microenvironment [90,91,92,93]. More than 30 clinical trials targeting CD73 or A2AR/A2BR in cancer are now underway [10, 12, 31]. More recently, study utilizing the CD39 pharmacological inhibitor POM-1 has described therapeutic potential of targeting CD39 in cancer [86]. However, doubts concerning the specificity, pharmacokinetics, therapeutic half-life, and toxicity of the CD39 pharmacological inhibitors prevent its further clinical applications. Thus, effective anti-mouse and anti-human CD39 mAb reagents have been developed in the recent four years and showed therapeutic potential in solid tumors, either as monotherapy or in potential ICB combinations [9, 27, 47, 94]. Moreover, targeting CD39, the rate-limiting ecto-enzyme of the ATP-adenosine pathway, demonstrated more profound anti-tumor effects compared with antagonists that block other members of the adenosinergic family (e.g., CD73 and A2AR/A2BR) [9, 14, 26]. Although the potential for targeting CD39 in cancer is promising, the mechanisms of action are still partially mysterious and need further investigation.

Targeting CD39 offers the theoretical potential to impact anti-tumor immunity in a twofold fashion: firstly, decreasing the extracellular adenosine reverses the adenosine receptor-mediated broadly and long term immune-suppressive TME; secondly, preventing the conversion of ATP to AMP results in the accumulation of eATP, a pro-inflammatory danger signal which will be available at relatively high concentration and thus stimulates immune cells in the TME [95,96,97,98,99].

Although targeting CD39 with a monoclonal antibody that blocks the mouse ecto-enzyme activity reverses the ATP/adenosine pathway in the TME, there are still limited understanding of how the immune cells respond to CD39 targeting therapy. Here we would like to summarize the possible immune cell reactions as potential mechanisms of action for targeting CD39 in cancer [26, 28, 87, 100] (Fig. 3). As further studies are emerging, rational design of targeting CD39 in cancer is expected.

Fig. 3
figure 3

The mechanisms of action of targeting CD39 in cancer. CD39 blocking antibody can increase the level of extracellular ATP (eATP) in the tumor microenvironment (TME) by inhibiting ATP degradation by CD39. The increased eATP levels activate the P2 × 7 receptor on macrophages and dendritic cells (DCs), resulting in inflammasome-mediated release of pro-inflammatory cytokines, including IL-18 and IL-1β, which support effector T cell and natural killer (NK) cell-mediated cytotoxicity. The increased eATP levels not only induce pyroptosis in P2 × 7 + macrophages (A) but also bind to P2 × 7 on DCs, enhancing antigen presentation and maturation, further supporting effector T cell and NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity (B). These are the two known mechanisms of action of targeting CD39 in cancer. Additionally, targeting CD39 may downregulate CD39 expression by binding to the CD39 receptor (C) and directly activate CD39 + tumor-specific T cells or CD39 + NK cells (D), which could be two potential new mechanisms

Full size image
  1. 1.

    Activation of the inflammasome in macrophages. Adenosine directly interacts with macrophages by binding to adenosine receptors, which impairs the differentiation and maturation of macrophages as well as lowers the pro-inflammatory mediators and enhances pro-tumorigenic markers [5, 55]. As a result of the reduced adenosine accumulation caused by blocking CD39, the anti-tumor activity of macrophages will be promoted. Furthermore, ATP accumulation in the TME by CD39 inhibition promotes pyroptosis and inflammatory response of macrophages via a P2 × 7-dependent manner. Moreover, the anti-tumor efficacy of CD39 inhibition is also amplified by intratumoural IL-18 expression by macrophages [10, 26].

  2. 2.

    Increasing APC maturation and antigen presentation. The antigen-presenting capacities and DC maturation are crucial for sustained anti-tumor immunity. Adenosine directly inhibits DC maturation and diminishes DC capacity to prime Th1 cell immunity, resulting in the decreased production of the pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-12 and TNF through the A2AR and/or A2BR pathways on DCs. Furthermore, it was reported that human monocyte-derived DCs exhibit an enhancement of maturation via increasing dosages of eATP using an allosteric modulator of CD39. Similarly, treatment of myeloid-derived DCs with ATP and a CD39 ecto-enzyme activity inhibitor resulted in an upregulation of CD86 expression and inflammatory cytokine production [28, 87]. In addition, POM-1 treatment induced the expansion of cDC1 in the TME in a mouse bladder cancer model, while Batf3-/- cDC1 -deficient mice failed to respond to POM-1 treatment [101]. These indicated that targeting CD39 might promote cDC1 -dependent tumor antigen presentation for anti-tumor CD8+ T cell activation.

  3. 3.

    Downregulating cell surface CD39. CD39 expression is increased in almost all cell types, including tumor cells, endothelial cells, fibroblasts, and immune cells in the TME. CD39 ecto-enzyme inhibitors have already demonstrated perfect functional activity in blocking CD39 phosphohydrolytic processing of ATP. Interestingly, human CD39 mAb significantly downregulates CD39 on both tumor cells and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes by immunohistochemistry and flow cytometry studies, suggesting a new mechanism of action involving additional downregulation of CD39 on cell surface with CD39 targeting antibodies [10, 26].

  4. 4.

    Directly activating exhausted CD8+T cell. Targeting CD39 can improve the anti-tumor efficacy with various immune cells and non-immune cells involved. Hence, determining whether CD39 inhibition, especially with antibodies, can directly activate exhausted CD8+ T cells in the TME is difficult. CD39 is an exhaustion marker that co-expresses with PD-1 in tumor associated CD8+ T cells. CD39 inhibition with a small-molecule or an antibody can increase the proliferation and function of both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in vitro. Moreover, CD39 inhibition with a small molecule or an antibody can strongly activate exhausted CD8+ T cell in the TME. However, more in vivo evidence of the direct activation of CD8+ T cells by CD39 targeting in tumor is still needed [10, 12, 26, 31].

  5. 5.

    Activating exhausted NK cell. In addition to CD8+ T cells, targeting CD39 by POM-1 or an antibody also increased the proportion of NK cells and more mature CD11b+ NK cells in the TME, as well as promoted expression of IFN-γ and CD107a by tumor-infiltrating NK cells [9, 86, 101], suggesting that targeting CD39 might also benefit the functional recovery of tumor -infiltrating NK cells.

CD39 and PD-1 combination therapy

CD39 and PD-1 are highly co-expressed in both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in the TME [10, 12, 26]. Both CD39 and PD-1 are perfect immunotherapy targets for tumor control since they can define the exhaustion phenotype of T cells [31, 38, 76]. Unlike PD-1, CD39 is also upregulated in almost all cells in the TME, including tumor cells, endothelial cells, fibroblasts, and immune cells [10, 12]. The mechanisms of action of ICB for PD-1 mostly rely on the conversion of exhausted T cells to activated T cells in tumor. However, as previously indicated, the mechanisms of action of antagonists that target CD39 are quite complex and almost completely different from ICB for PD-1. Previous research has demonstrated that combined treatment with anti-CD39 and anti-PD1 is more effective in combating tumors than either treatment alone [10, 26]. Anti-CD39 can convert anti-PD1 resistant tumors to sensitive, thereby transforming “cold” tumors to “hot” tumors. Mechanistically, anti-CD39 increases the proliferation of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes, while anti-PD-1 reverses the exhaustion phenotype of these lymphocytes. Together, these treatments achieve a synergistic antitumor effect. Hence, a synergistic anti-tumor effect of combination therapy with ICB for PD-1 and antagonists for CD39 is expected in clinical trials.

Perspective

CD39 is a novel biomarker of exhausted T cells and an immune checkpoint target for tumor immunotherapy [76, 79, 82, 94]. The immune-suppressive effect of CD39 is mainly mediated by promoting the production of adenosine. CD39-targeted monoclonal antibodies have been developed in the last four years and have shown to significantly suppress tumor growth in preclinical cancer models [27, 28, 94]. However, most investigations on CD39 targeting in cancer are still limited to mouse tumor models. Moreover, more research into the mechanisms of action of targeting CD39 is required.

More than 50 therapeutic combination therapies targeting the ATP–adenosine pathway via CD73 or A2AR/A2BR antagonists are being explored in the clinic [3, 10, 14]. The combination therapy trials in clinical landscape are under rapid evolution. Hence, prioritizing strategies that offer a combinatorial benefit when targeting CD39 in cancer is critical. Recently, several CD39-targeting agents have entered clinical trials (Table 1), with additional agents set to follow [11, 28, 87, 94]. As first-in-human studies are now underway, further insights into the mechanisms of action and the sensitive tumor types with anti-CD39 therapy are anticipated in the coming years.

Table 1 Targeting CD39 in clinical trials
Full size table

Data availability

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

ATP:

Adenosine triphosphate

ADP:

Adenosine diphosphate

AMP:

Adenosine monophosphate

cAMP:

Cyclic Adenosine monophosphate

TME:

tumor microenvironment

eATP:

extracellular ATP

CD39:

Ectonucleoside triphosphate diphosphohydrolase-1

CD73:

Ecto-5′-Nucleotidase

A2AR:

Adenosine A2a receptor

A2BR:

Adenosine A2b receptor

PD-1:

ProgrammedDeath-1

ICB:

Immune checkpoint blockade

GPCR:

G protein coupled receptors

NAD+:

Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide

NT5E:

Ecto-5-nucleotidase

ENPP:

Ecto-nucleotide pyrophosphate/phosphodiesterases

ENTPDases:

Ectonucleoside triphosphate diphosphohydrolases

TNF-α:

Tumor necrosis factor-alpha

AHR:

Aryl hydrocarbon receptor

LPS:

Lipopolysaccharide

IL:

Interleukin

Tregs:

T regulatory cells

MDSC:

Myeloid-derived suppressor cells

NSCLC:

non-small-cell lung cancer

FOXP3+:

Forkhead box protein 3

IFN-γ:

Interferon-γ

MS:

Multiple sclerosis

TR1:

Type 1 regulatory T

PBMCs:

Peripheral blood mononuclear cells

mTOR:

Mammalian target of rapamycin

References

  1. Zhulai G, Oleinik E, Shibaev M, Ignatev K. Adenosine-Metabolizing enzymes, Adenosine kinase and Adenosine Deaminase, in Cancer. Biomolecules. 2022;12(3).

  2. Vigano S, Alatzoglou D, Irving M, Menetrier-Caux C, Caux C, Romero P, et al. Targeting Adenosine in Cancer Immunotherapy to enhance T-Cell function. Front Immunol. 2019;10:925.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Hammami A, Allard D, Allard B, Stagg J. Targeting the adenosine pathway for cancer immunotherapy. Semin Immunol. 2019;42:101304.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sek K, Molck C, Stewart GD, Kats L, Darcy PK, Beavis PA. Targeting adenosine receptor signaling in Cancer Immunotherapy. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19(12).

  5. Leone R, Emens L. Targeting adenosine for cancer immunotherapy. J Immunother Cancer. 2018;6(57).

  6. Vijayan D, Young A, Teng MWL, Smyth MJ. Targeting immunosuppressive adenosine in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2017;17(12):709–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Feng LL, Cai YQ, Zhu MC, Xing LJ, Wang X. The yin and yang functions of extracellular ATP and adenosine in tumor immunity. Cancer Cell Int. 2020;20:110.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Young A, Ngiow SF, Barkauskas DS, Sult E, Hay C, Blake SJ, et al. Co-inhibition of CD73 and A2AR Adenosine Signaling improves Anti-tumor Immune responses. Cancer Cell. 2016;30(3):391–403.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Yan J, Li XY, Roman Aguilera A, Xiao C, Jacoberger-Foissac C, Nowlan B, et al. Control of Metastases via myeloid CD39 and NK cell effector function. Cancer Immunol Res. 2020;8(3):356–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Moesta AK, Li X-Y, Smyth MJ. Targeting CD39 in cancer. Nat Rev Immunol. 2020;20(12):739–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Aroua N, Boet E, Ghisi M, Nicolau-Travers ML, Saland E, Gwilliam R, et al. Extracellular ATP and CD39 activate cAMP-Mediated mitochondrial stress response to promote Cytarabine Resistance in Acute myeloid leukemia. Cancer Discov. 2020;10(10):1544–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Allard D, Allard B, Stagg J. On the mechanism of anti-CD39 immune checkpoint therapy. J Immunother Cancer. 2020;8(1).

  13. Eiva MA, Omran DK, Chacon JA, Powell DJ. Jr. Systematic analysis of CD39, CD103, CD137, and PD-1 as biomarkers for naturally occurring tumor antigen-specific TILs. Eur J Immunol. 2022;52(1):96–108.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Battastini AMO, Figueiró F, Leal DBR, Doleski PH, Schetinger MRC. CD39 and CD73 as Promising therapeutic targets: what could be the Limitations? Front Pharmacol. 2021;12.

  15. Wang S, Gao S, Zhou D, Qian X, Luan J, Lv X. The role of the CD39–CD73–adenosine pathway in liver disease. J Cell Physiol. 2020;236(2):851–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Allard B, Longhi MS, Robson SC, Stagg J. The ectonucleotidases CD39 and CD73: novel checkpoint inhibitor targets. Immunol Rev. 2017;276(1):121–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Yegutkin GG, Boison D. ATP and Adenosine Metabolism in Cancer: Exploitation for Therapeutic Gain. Pharmacol Rev. 2022;74(3):797–822.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Losenkova K, Zuccarini M, Karikoski M, Laurila J, Boison D, Jalkanen S et al. Compartmentalization of adenosine metabolism in cancer cells and its modulation during acute hypoxia. J Cell Sci. 2020;133(10).

  19. Chini EN, Chini CCS, Espindola Netto JM, de Oliveira GC, van Schooten W. The pharmacology of CD38/NADase: an emerging target in Cancer and Diseases of Aging. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2018;39(4):424–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Young A, Ngiow SF, Gao Y, Patch AM, Barkauskas DS, Messaoudene M, et al. A2AR Adenosine Signaling suppresses natural killer cell maturation in the Tumor Microenvironment. Cancer Res. 2018;78(4):1003–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Vijayan D, Barkauskas DS, Stannard K, Sult E, Buonpane R, Takeda K, et al. Selective activation of anti-CD73 mechanisms in control of primary tumors and metastases. Oncoimmunology. 2017;6(5):e1312044.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Mittal D, Sinha D, Barkauskas D, Young A, Kalimutho M, Stannard K, et al. Adenosine 2B receptor expression on Cancer cells promotes Metastasis. Cancer Res. 2016;76(15):4372–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hay CM, Sult E, Huang Q, Mulgrew K, Fuhrmann SR, McGlinchey KA, et al. Targeting CD73 in the tumor microenvironment with MEDI9447. Oncoimmunology. 2016;5(8):e1208875.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Piccione EC, Mikesell G, Daine-Matsuoka B, Walter K, Miller R, McCaffery I. A novel CD73-blocking antibody reduces production of immunosuppressive adenosine and restores T cell function [abstract]. Cancer Res. 2017;77:(Suppl. 13),5577.

  25. Young A, Ngiow SF, Madore J, Reinhardt J, Landsberg J, Chitsazan A, et al. Targeting Adenosine in BRAF-Mutant Melanoma reduces Tumor Growth and Metastasis. Cancer Res. 2017;77(17):4684–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Li XY, Moesta AK, Xiao C, Nakamura K, Casey M, Zhang H, et al. Targeting CD39 in Cancer reveals an extracellular ATP- and inflammasome-driven tumor immunity. Cancer Discov. 2019;9(12):1754–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Wei Z, Ren F, Gong S, Shi B, Ouyang K, Wu C. A humanized monoclonal antibody targeting CD39 with novel mechanism for cancer treatment. Med Drug Discovery. 2021;11.

  28. Perrot I, Michaud HA, Giraudon-Paoli M, Augier S, Docquier A, Gros L, et al. Blocking antibodies targeting the CD39/CD73 immunosuppressive pathway unleash Immune responses in Combination Cancer Therapies. Cell Rep. 2019;27(8):2411–25. e9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Yegutkin GG. Enzymes involved in metabolism of extracellular nucleotides and nucleosides: functional implications and measurement of activities. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 2014;49(6):473–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Zimmermann H, Zebisch M, Strater N. Cellular function and molecular structure of ecto-nucleotidases. Purinergic Signal. 2012;8(3):437–502.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Timperi E, Barnaba V. CD39 regulation and functions in T cells. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(15).

  32. Di Virgilio F, Adinolfi E. Extracellular purines, purinergic receptors and tumor growth. Oncogene. 2017;36(3):293–303.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Chen L, Diao L, Yang Y, Yi X, Rodriguez BL, Li Y, et al. CD38-Mediated immunosuppression as a mechanism of Tumor cell escape from PD-1/PD-L1 blockade. Cancer Discov. 2018;8(9):1156–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Wang T-F, Guidotti G. CD39 is an Ecto-(Ca2+,Mg2+)-apyrase. J Biol Chem. 1996;271(17):9898–901.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Diaz-Garcia E, Garcia-Tovar S, Alfaro E, Zamarron E, Mangas A, Galera R, et al. Role of CD39 in COVID-19 severity: Dysregulation of Purinergic Signaling and Thromboinflammation. Front Immunol. 2022;13:847894.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Zou F, Tan J, Liu T, Liu B, Tang Y, Zhang H, et al. The CD39 + HBV surface protein-targeted CAR-T and personalized tumor-reactive CD8 + T cells exhibit potent anti-HCC activity. Mol Ther. 2021;29(5):1794–807.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Tallón de Lara P, Castañón H, Vermeer M, Núñez N, Silina K, Sobottka B et al. CD39 + PD-1 + CD8 + T cells mediate metastatic dormancy in breast cancer. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1).

  38. Dong DN, Fan PW, Feng YN, Liu GH, Peng YC, Dong T, et al. Association between circulating CD39 + CD8 + T cells pre-chemoradiotherapy and prognosis in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Chin Med J (Engl). 2021;134(17):2066–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Parka Y, Ryu H, Kim GC, Hwang B, Sik Kim E. IL-27 confers a protumorigenic activity of regulatory T cells via CD39. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019;116(8):3106–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Bonnefoy N, Bastid J, Alberici G, Bensussan A, Eliaou JF. CD39: a complementary target to immune checkpoints to counteract tumor-mediated immunosuppression. Oncoimmunology. 2015;4(5):e1003015.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Takenaka MC, Gabriely G, Rothhammer V, Mascanfroni ID, Wheeler MA, Chao CC, et al. Control of tumor-associated macrophages and T cells in glioblastoma via AHR and CD39. Nat Neurosci. 2019;22(5):729–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Liu T, Tan J, Wu M, Fan W, Wei J, Zhu B, et al. High-affinity neoantigens correlate with better prognosis and trigger potent antihepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) activity by activating CD39(+)CD8(+) T cells. Gut. 2021;70(10):1965–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Mosaad Zaki E, Mohamed Zahran A, Abdelazeem Metwaly A, Hafez R, Hussein S, Elaiw Mohammed A. Impact of CD39 expression on CD4 + T lymphocytes and 6q deletion on outcome of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Hematol Oncol Stem Cell Ther. 2019;12(1):26–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. d’Almeida SM, Kauffenstein G, Roy C, Basset L, Papargyris L, Henrion D, et al. The ecto-ATPDase CD39 is involved in the acquisition of the immunoregulatory phenotype by M-CSF-macrophages and ovarian cancer tumor-associated macrophages: Regulatory role of IL-27. Oncoimmunology. 2016;5(7):e1178025.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Perry C, Hazan-Halevy I, Kay S, Cipok M, Grisaru D, Deutsch V et al. Increased CD39 expression on CD4 + T lymphocytes has clinical and prognostic significance in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Ann Hematol. 2012(91):1271–9.

  46. Li J, Wang L, Chen X, Li L, Li Y, Ping Y, et al. CD39/CD73 upregulation on myeloid-derived suppressor cells via TGF-beta-mTOR-HIF-1 signaling in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Oncoimmunology. 2017;6(6):e1320011.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Bastid J, Regairaz A, Bonnefoy N, Dejou C, Giustiniani J, Laheurte C, et al. Inhibition of CD39 enzymatic function at the surface of tumor cells alleviates their immunosuppressive activity. Cancer Immunol Res. 2015;3(3):254–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Antonioli L, Pacher P, Vizi ES, Hasko G. CD39 and CD73 in immunity and inflammation. Trends Mol Med. 2013;19(6):355–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. De Marchi E, Orioli E, Pegoraro A, Sangaletti S, Portararo P, Curti A, et al. The P2X7 receptor modulates immune cells infiltration, ectonucleotidases expression and extracellular ATP levels in the tumor microenvironment. Oncogene. 2019;38(19):3636–50.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Puchalowicz K, Tarnowski M, Baranowska-Bosiacka I, Chlubek D, Dziedziejko V. P2X and P2Y receptors-role in the pathophysiology of the nervous system. Int J Mol Sci. 2014;15(12):23672–704.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Eltzschig HK, Sitkovsky MV, Robson SC. Purinergic signaling during inflammation. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(24):2322–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Savio LEB, de Andrade Mello P, Figliuolo VR, de Avelar Almeida TF, Santana PT, Oliveira SDS, et al. CD39 limits P2X7 receptor inflammatory signaling and attenuates sepsis-induced liver injury. J Hepatol. 2017;67(4):716–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Takenaka MC, Robson S, Quintana FJ. Regulation of the T cell response by CD39. Trends Immunol. 2016;37(7):427–39.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Zumerle S, Cali B, Munari F, Angioni R, Di Virgilio F, Molon B, et al. Intercellular Calcium Signaling Induced by ATP Potentiates Macrophage phagocytosis. Cell Rep. 2019;27(1):1–10e4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Young A, Mittal D, Stagg J, Smyth MJ. Targeting cancer-derived adenosine: new therapeutic approaches. Cancer Discov. 2014;4(8):879–88.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Ahlmanner F, Sundström P, Akeus P, Eklöf J, Börjesson L, Gustavsson B, et al. CD39+ regulatory T cells accumulate in colon adenocarcinomas and display markers of increased suppressive function. Oncotarget. 2018;9(97):36993–7007.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Koh J, Kim Y, Lee KY, Hur JY, Kim MS, Kim B, et al. MDSC subtypes and CD39 expression on CD8(+) T cells predict the efficacy of anti-PD-1 immunotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC. Eur J Immunol. 2020;50(11):1810–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Chen Y, Corriden R, Inoue Y, Yip L, Hashiguchi N, Zinkernagel A, et al. ATP release guides neutrophil chemotaxis via P2Y2 and A3 receptors. Science. 2006;15(Electronic):1095–9203.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Reutershan J, Vollmer I, Stark S, Wagner R, Ngamsri KC, Eltzschig HK. Adenosine and inflammation: CD39 and CD73 are critical mediators in LPS-induced PMN trafficking into the lungs. FASEB J. 2009;23(2):473–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Zhao H, Bo C, Kang Y, Li H. What else can CD39 tell us? Front Immunol. 2017;8:727.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Lu Y, Cheng L, Li F, Ji L, Shao X, Wu B, et al. The abnormal function of CD39(+) regulatory T cells could be corrected by high-dose dexamethasone in patients with primary immune thrombocytopenia. Ann Hematol. 2019;98(8):1845–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Sundstrom P, Stenstad H, Langenes V, Ahlmanner F, Theander L, Ndah TG, et al. Regulatory T cells from Colon cancer patients inhibit effector T-cell Migration through an adenosine-dependent mechanism. Cancer Immunol Res. 2016;4(3):183–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Ohta A, Sitkovsky M. Extracellular adenosine-mediated modulation of regulatory T cells. Front Immunol. 2014;5:304.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Sun X, Wu Y, Gao W, Enjyoji K, Csizmadia E, Muller CE, et al. CD39/ENTPD1 expression by CD4 + Foxp3 + regulatory T cells promotes hepatic metastatic tumor growth in mice. Gastroenterology. 2010;139(3):1030–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Borsellino G, Kleinewietfeld M, Di Mitri D, Sternjak A, Diamantini A, Giometto R, et al. Expression of ectonucleotidase CD39 by Foxp3 + Treg cells: hydrolysis of extracellular ATP and immune suppression. Blood. 2007;110(4):1225–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Gibson DJ, Elliott L, McDermott E, Tosetto M, Keegan D, Byrne K, et al. Heightened expression of CD39 by Regulatory T Lymphocytes is Associated with Therapeutic Remission in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2015;21(12):2806–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Guillerey C, Huntington ND, Smyth MJ. Targeting natural killer cells in cancer immunotherapy. Nat Immunol. 2016;17(9):1025–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Kunzli BM, Bernlochner MI, Rath S, Kaser S, Csizmadia E, Enjyoji K, et al. Impact of CD39 and purinergic signalling on the growth and metastasis of colorectal cancer. Purinergic Signal. 2011;7(2):231–41.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Alvarez-Sanchez N, Cruz-Chamorro I, Diaz-Sanchez M, Lardone PJ, Guerrero JM, Carrillo-Vico A. Peripheral CD39-expressing T regulatory cells are increased and associated with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in relapsing patients. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):2302.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Sim GC, Martin-Orozco N, Jin L, Yang Y, Wu S, Washington E, et al. IL-2 therapy promotes suppressive ICOS + Treg expansion in melanoma patients. J Clin Invest. 2014;124(1):99–110.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Chihara N, Madi A, Karwacz K, Awasthi A, Kuchroo VK. Differentiation and characterization of Tr1 cells. Curr Protoc Immunol. 2016;113:3.

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Mascanfroni ID, Takenaka MC, Yeste A, Patel B, Wu Y, Kenison JE, et al. Metabolic control of type 1 regulatory T cell differentiation by AHR and HIF1-alpha. Nat Med. 2015;21(6):638–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Ostapchuk YO, Perfilyeva YV, Kustova EA, Urazalieva NT, Omarbaeva NA, Talaeva SG, et al. Functional heterogeneity of circulating T regulatory cell subsets in breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer. 2018;25(6):687–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Doherty GA, Bai A, Hanidziar D, Longhi MS, Lawlor GO, Putheti P, et al. CD73 is a phenotypic marker of effector memory Th17 cells in inflammatory bowel disease. Eur J Immunol. 2012;42(11):3062–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. Schuler PJ, Schilling B, Harasymczuk M, Hoffmann TK, Johnson J, Lang S, et al. Phenotypic and functional characteristics of CD4 + CD39 + FOXP3 + and CD4 + CD39 + FOXP3neg T-cell subsets in cancer patients. Eur J Immunol. 2012;42(7):1876–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. Qi Y, Xia Y, Lin Z, Qu Y, Qi Y, Chen Y, et al. Tumor-infiltrating CD39(+)CD8(+) T cells determine poor prognosis and immune evasion in clear cell renal cell carcinoma patients. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2020;69(8):1565–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Gallerano D, Ciminati S, Grimaldi A, Piconese S, Cammarata I, Focaccetti C, et al. Genetically driven CD39 expression shapes human tumor-infiltrating CD8(+) T-cell functions. Int J Cancer. 2020;147(9):2597–610.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. van Duijn J, van Elsas M, Benne N, Depuydt M, Wezel A, Smeets H, et al. CD39 identifies a microenvironment-specific anti-inflammatory CD8(+) T-cell population in atherosclerotic lesions. Atherosclerosis. 2019;285:71–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Duhen T, Duhen R, Montler R, Moses J, Moudgil T, de Miranda NF, et al. Co-expression of CD39 and CD103 identifies tumor-reactive CD8 T cells in human solid tumors. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):2724.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  80. Canale FP, Ramello MC, Nunez N, Araujo Furlan CL, Bossio SN, Gorosito Serran M, et al. CD39 expression defines cell exhaustion in Tumor-Infiltrating CD8(+) T cells. Cancer Res. 2018;78(1):115–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Holm JS, Funt SA, Borch A, Munk KK, Bjerregaard AM, Reading JL, et al. Neoantigen-specific CD8 T cell responses in the peripheral blood following PD-L1 blockade might predict therapy outcome in metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):1935.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. Simoni Y, Becht E, Fehlings M, Loh CY, Koo SL, Teng KWW, et al. Bystander CD8(+) T cells are abundant and phenotypically distinct in human tumour infiltrates. Nature. 2018;557(7706):575–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Vieyra-Lobato MR, Vela-Ojeda J, Montiel-Cervantes L, López-Santiago R, Moreno-Lafont MC. Description of CD8(+) Regulatory T Lymphocytes and their specific intervention in graft-versus-host and infectious Diseases, autoimmunity, and Cancer. J Immunol Res. 2018;2018:3758713.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  84. Parodi A, Tardito S, Simonato A, Battaglia F, Stringara S, Traverso P et al. CD39 is highly involved in mediating the suppression activity of tumor-infiltrating CD8 + T regulatory lymphocytes. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2013.

  85. Sun X, Han L, Seth P, Bian S, Li L, Csizmadia E, et al. Disordered purinergic signaling and abnormal cellular metabolism are associated with development of liver cancer in Cd39/ENTPD1 null mice. Hepatology. 2013;57(1):205–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Zhang H, Vijayan D, Li XY, Robson SC, Geetha N, Teng MWL, et al. The role of NK cells and CD39 in the immunological control of tumor metastases. Oncoimmunology. 2019;8(6):e1593809.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  87. Spatola BN, Lerner AG, Wong C, Dela Cruz T, Welch M, Fung W, et al. Fully human anti-CD39 antibody potently inhibits ATPase activity in cancer cells via uncompetitive allosteric mechanism. MAbs. 2020;12(1):1838036.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  88. Schakel L, Schmies CC, Idris RM, Luo X, Lee SY, Lopez V, et al. Nucleotide Analog ARL67156 as a lead structure for the development of CD39 and dual CD39/CD73 ectonucleotidase inhibitors. Front Pharmacol. 2020;11:1294.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  89. Liao J, Zeng DN, Li JZ, Hua QM, Xiao Z, He C, et al. Targeting adenosinergic pathway enhances the anti-tumor efficacy of sorafenib in hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatol Int. 2020;14(1):80–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. de Leve S, Wirsdorfer F, Jendrossek V. Targeting the Immunomodulatory CD73/Adenosine system to improve the therapeutic gain of Radiotherapy. Front Immunol. 2019;10:698.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  91. Allard B, Turcotte M, Spring K, Pommey S, Royal I, Stagg J. Anti-CD73 therapy impairs tumor angiogenesis. Int J Cancer. 2014;134(6):1466–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Terp MG, Olesen KA, Arnspang EC, Lund RR, Lagerholm BC, Ditzel HJ, et al. Anti-human CD73 monoclonal antibody inhibits metastasis formation in human breast cancer by inducing clustering and internalization of CD73 expressed on the surface of cancer cells. J Immunol. 2013;191(8):4165–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Allard B, Pommey S, Smyth MJ, Stagg J. Targeting CD73 enhances the antitumor activity of anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 mAbs. Clin Cancer Res. 2013;19(20):5626–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Geraghty NJ, Watson D, Sluyter R. Pharmacological blockade of the CD39/CD73 pathway but not adenosine receptors augments disease in a humanized mouse model of graft-versus-host disease. Immunol Cell Biol. 2019;97(6):597–610.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. da Silva JLG, Passos DF, Bernardes VM, Leal DBR. ATP and adenosine: role in the immunopathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. Immunol Lett. 2019;214:55–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Bertoni APS, de Campos RP, Tsao M, Braganhol E, Furlanetto TW, Wink MR. Extracellular ATP is differentially metabolized on papillary thyroid carcinoma cells surface in comparison to normal cells. Cancer Microenviron. 2018;11(1):61–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  97. Allard D, Turcotte M, Stagg J. Targeting A2 adenosine receptors in cancer. Immunol Cell Biol. 2017;95(4):333–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Umansky V, Shevchenko I, Bazhin AV, Utikal J. Extracellular adenosine metabolism in immune cells in melanoma. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2014;63(10):1073–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Cekic C, Sag D, Day YJ, Linden J. Extracellular adenosine regulates naive T cell development and peripheral maintenance. J Exp Med. 2013;210(12):2693–706.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  100. Jeffrey JL, Lawson KV, Powers JP. Targeting metabolism of Extracellular Nucleotides via Inhibition of Ectonucleotidases CD73 and CD39. J Med Chem. 2020;63(22):13444–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Liu L, Hou Y, Deng C, Tao Z, Chen Z, Hu J, et al. Single cell sequencing reveals that CD39 inhibition mediates changes to the tumor microenvironment. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):6740.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This study is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82230067, 32200936), the Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Tumor Interventional Diagnosis and Treatment (2021B1212040004). Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (2021A1515110561).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Yao Liu, Zhongliang Li and Xiaoguang Zhao authors contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Tumor Interventional Diagnosis and Treatment, Zhuhai People’s Hospital, Zhuhai Hospital Affiliated with Jinan University, Zhuhai, 519000, Guangdong, P.R. China

    Yao Liu, Zhongliang Li, Xiaoguang Zhao, Xian-Yang Li & Ligong Lu

  2. Institute of Translational Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Macau, Taipa, Macau, China

    Jing Xiao & Guokai Chen

  3. CAS Key Laboratory of Quantitative Engineering Biology, Shenzhen Institute of Synthetic Biology, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China

    Jiacheng Bi

  4. Department of R&D, OriCell Therapeutics Co. Ltd, No.1227, Zhangheng Rd, Pudong, Shanghai, China

    Xian-Yang Li

Authors
  1. Yao Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zhongliang Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xiaoguang Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jing Xiao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jiacheng Bi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Xian-Yang Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Guokai Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Ligong Lu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Y Liu, ZL Li and JC Bi prepared the manuscript. Y Liu, XG Zhao and J Xiao prepared the figures and table. XY Li, GK Chen and LG Lu checked the manuscript for final review. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Xian-Yang Li, Guokai Chen or Ligong Lu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

All authors agree to submit the article for publication.

Competing interest

XY Li is an employee of Oricell Therapeutics. Other authors have no conflict of interests to declare.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, Y., Li, Z., Zhao, X. et al. Review immune response of targeting CD39 in cancer. Biomark Res 11, 63 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40364-023-00500-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40364-023-00500-w

Keywords

Biomarker Research

ISSN: 2050-7771

Contact us