Skip to main content
Download PDF

Social connectedness and suicidal ideation: the roles of perceived burdensomeness and thwarted belongingness in the distress to suicidal ideation pathway

BMC Psychology volume 11, Article number: 312 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Suicide is a serious public health issue. Distress has been identified as a common risk factor, with research also suggesting that a lack of social connectedness is involved.

Methods

This quantitative, cross-sectional study investigated the role of perceived burdensomeness and thwarted belongingness in the psychological distress/suicidal ideation pathway in a community sample of 480 Australian adults.

Results

As expected, distress was found to be a strong predictor of suicidal ideation. Perceived burdensomeness and thwarted belongingness both moderated and mediated the relationship between distress and suicidal ideation. Specifically, distress was more strongly linked to suicide ideation when burdensomeness or thwarted belongingness were also high. This moderating effect was stronger for thwarted belongingness than it was for burdensomeness. These variables also mediated the pathway, in that higher distress related to higher burdensomeness and thwarted belonging, which in turn related to higher suicide ideation. This mediating effect was stronger for burdensomeness than for thwarted belonging.

Conclusions

Overall, the findings confirm the importance of our social relatedness in suicide. Increasing belongingness and reducing the perception of being a burden on others may be an important intervention strategy for weakening the link between distress and suicide ideation.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Suicide is a serious public health issue worldwide, with over 700,000 deaths recorded annually. [1] In Australia, suicide is the leading cause of death for young adults, with rates among this group rising over the past decade [2]. A meta-analysis examining 50 years of research has concluded that many currently known risk factors for suicide have a predictive value little better than chance, [3] highlighting the importance of early intervention at the point where suicidal thoughts first emerge. While suicidal thoughts do not always lead to attempts or fatalities, [4] the prolonged presence of suicidal thoughts over time can increase the risk of death by suicide, [5] and are associated with a declining mental and physical health trajectory over multiple years [6]. It has been proposed that universal screening for suicidal thoughts in healthcare settings is a feasible method of detecting people at risk of suicide, [7] however once detected it is crucial to gain an understanding of the psychosocial drivers underlying the suicidal thoughts, so that a treatment plan can be devised to directly address them [8].

Psychological distress, a state of emotional suffering often characterised by depressive and anxious symptoms, [9] has been strongly linked with suicidal thoughts [10, 11]. In Australia, high levels of psychological distress are experienced by at least 1 in 7 people in a four-week period, with rates higher in young adults [12]. However, psychological distress alone does not inevitably lead to the development of suicidal thoughts [13]. The integrated motivational-volitional (IMV) model of suicidal behaviour proposes a motivational phase that can follow elevated levels of distress, a phase which includes feelings of defeat, humiliation, and entrapment as precursors to the development of suicidal thoughts [14]. Whether suicidal thinking develops from these feelings is dependent on the presence of several ‘motivational moderators’ which can strengthen or weaken suicidal intent [14]. These include belongingness, a feeling of being connected to others in mutually satisfying and reciprocal relationships [15]; and perceived burdensomeness, a set of beliefs that one’s presence is a drain on other people and society, leading to thoughts of suicide as a beneficial solution [15].

The concepts of thwarted belonging (TB) and perceived burdensomeness (PB) are also central components in the interpersonal-psychological theory of suicidal behaviour (IPS), which proposes that both these conditions interact to produce suicidal thinking, along with a sense of hopelessness about the possibility of change [15]. There have been three systematic reviews of the IPS processes on suicidal thoughts and behaviours, [16–18] producing mixed results. The review by Ma et al. [16] concluded that PB is more often significantly related to suicidal ideation than TB (significance reached in 83% of studies for PB vs. 40% of studies for TB), while noting that TB has been less studied. The meta-analysis conducted by Chu et al. [17] encompassing 46 studies found that the interaction of TB and PB on suicidal ideation was significant, but modest (r = .14), with stronger effects being found separately for univariate associations between suicidal ideation and TB (r = .37) and PB (r = .48). The final review by Espinosa-Salido et al. [18] focused on the indirect effects of TB and PB, concluding that they each acted as mediators between aspects of psychological distress and suicidal thinking, but again more strongly as individual constructs rather than interacting ones.

The case for examining TB and PB separately makes theoretical as well as practical sense. For example, it is possible to feel a deep sense of connection to other people while simultaneously believing oneself to be a burden on those others, [19] or to have few close relationships where beliefs of perceived burden could be attached [20]. The relatively smaller number of TB studies compared to PB also leaves an important gap in literature, given that the risk of death by suicide is known to decrease as the number of social connections increases [21]. The concept of TB encompasses several aspects of social connectedness, including strength and quality of perceived interpersonal relationships, and frequency of interaction with others. [22] Given that social connectedness is a known protective factor against suicidal ideation, [23] further research is warranted to explore the role of TB in bridging and intensifying the relationship between psychological distress and suicidal ideation.

Worst-point suicidal ideation is predictive of the transition to suicide attempts and fatalities, [24, 25] so understanding how psychosocial factors work to intensify suicidal ideation may additionally help in the development of better targeted and more timely intervention efforts. While a number of studies have explored the role of TB and PB as mediators, [16, 18] moderating effects of TB and PB on the relationship between psychological distress and suicidal ideation appear less explored, presenting a crucial gap from a suicide risk perspective. Experience sampling studies have shown that psychological distress and suicidal ideation can intensify dramatically over the course of a few hours, [26, 27] with interpersonal negative life events predicting greater intensity of next-hour suicidal thoughts [28]. This potentially rapid increase in risk illustrates the importance of exploring how TB and PB may intensify the relationship between distress and suicidal thought processes.

To facilitate the development of more targeted interventions for suicidal ideation in the future, the present study therefore aimed to examine separately the mediating and moderating influence of TB and PB on suicidal ideation, using a community-based sample of Australian adults. It was hypothesised that:

  1. 1.

    Higher levels of psychological distress will be associated with higher levels of suicide ideation;

  2. 2.

    PB will moderate the relationship between psychological distress and suicidal ideation such that higher levels of PB will be associated with higher levels of psychological distress and suicidal ideation (Fig. 1);

  3. 3.

    TB will moderate the relationship between psychological distress and suicidal ideation such that higher levels of TB will be associated with higher levels of psychological distress and suicidal ideation (Fig. 1);

  4. 4.

    PB will mediate psychological distress and suicide ideation (Fig. 2), with increased distress leading to increased feelings of PB which in turn increase suicide ideation; and.

  5. 5.

    TB will mediate psychological distress and suicide ideation (Fig. 3) with increased distress leading to an increase in feelings of TB which in turn increases suicide ideation.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Moderating effect of PB and TB on the Relationship between Psychological Distress and Suicide Ideation (separate analysis for each moderator)

Full size image

Method

Participants

Participants were recruited through Prolific, a paid online survey recruitment platform. International studies on the demographic representation of online samples for statistical studies demonstrate high validity for generating representative population samples [29]. Prolific participant responses were screened and deleted where unusually brief or patterned responses occurred. Participants were required to be 18 years of age or older, and reside in Australia. As the sample required a general representation of the Australian population, a history of mental distress, mental illness, or suicidality was not required to participate. No other inclusion or exclusion criteria were applied. Participants were paid 15AUD per hour (pro rata) for their time taking the survey. Cases with missing data were deleted (n = 16). Data from 480 participants with an average age of 33.7 (range = 18–75 years old) were analysed for this study (Table 1).

Table 1 Demographic data of participants (n = 480)
Full size table

Measures

Suicidal ideation attributes scale (SIDAS)

The SIDAS is a five-item scale assessing frequency of SI (item 1), controllability of ideations (item 2), closeness to an attempt (item 3), level of distress (item 4), and interference with daily activities (item 5) over the past month rated on 10-point scales [30]. Total SIDAS scores are calculated as the sum of the five items, with controllability (item 2) reverse scored. Total scale scores range from 0 to 50. Higher scores are indicative of greater suicidal ideation severity. The internal consistency for the current study was Cα=0.80.

Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K-10)

K-10 is a 10-item questionnaire assessing general psychological distress in the 30 days prior to administration [31]. Items assess symptoms commonly associated with depressive and anxiety disorders. Responses are scored on a five-point scale from 0 to 4, with increasing values corresponding to higher levels of distress. A total score ranging from 10 to 50 is derived by summing all items. The Cronbach alpha for the current study was Cα=0.93.

Interpersonal needs questionnaire (INQ-15)

The Interpersonal Needs Questionnaire is 15-item self-report measure [32]. The INQ-15 includes six questions to measure Perceived Burdensomeness ( item 1 to item 6) and nine questions to assess Thwarted Belongingness. Participants record their responses to the presented statements on a 7-point Likert-type scale, where 1 indicates “Not at all like me”, and 7 indicates “Very true for me”. Items 7, 8, 10, 13, 14, and 15 of the Thwarted Belongingness subscale are reverse-coded. Thus, higher scores reflect higher levels of Thwarted Belongingness and Perceived Burdensomeness. Internal consistency was strong in the current study, PB Cα=0.96, and TB Cα=0.91,

Procedure

Approval was sought and granted for this study by the Victoria University Research Ethics Committee. Data was collected online through the Qualtrics survey platform.

Design and statistical analysis

The current study was guided by a positivist epistemology and utilised a quantitative, correlational design. Descriptive analyses and moderated regressions were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 27 with the PROCESS macro. Moderation and Mediation analysis was tested using PROCESS (Model 1 and 4 respectively). [33] Moderation occurs when the interaction term 95% CI does not contain zero. Mediation occurs when the indirect effect term 95% CI does not contain zero.

Results

Analysis

Descriptive statistics

Mean and standard deviations for the variables are presented in Table 2.

Table 2 Mean scores and standard deviations for the variables
Full size table

An independent sample t-test revealed no significant difference on SIDAS between male and female participants F(472) = 0.866, p = .352. As a result, the variable of gender was not included in any further analysis. Mean distress was in mild distress range, while suicide ideation was low.

A significant negative relationship was found between age and the variables of distress, ideation, PB and TB, suggesting that distress decreases with age. Distress, ideation, PB and TB were all positively interrelated. The correlations matrix results can be seen in Table 3.

Table 3 Correlation Matrix of Age with Psychological Distress, Suicide Ideation, and Interpersonal Needs
Full size table

Hierarchical regression for hypothesis testing

To test the hypotheses that PB and TB moderated the relationship between psychological distress and suicide ideation a hierarchical regression model was conducted using PROCESS macro (Model 1) [33]. In line with recommendations by Espinosa-Salido et al., [18] the variables were entered into separate models. All scores were mean centred as part of the analysis.

Hypothesis 1

Higher levels of psychological distress will predict higher levels of suicide ideation.

Distress was a significant unique predictor in both moderation models, as seen in Table 4.

Table 4 Results of Moderation analysis in PROCESS Procedure for SPSS Version 4.0 for Emotional Distress Predicting Suicide Ideation
Full size table

Hypothesis 2

Perceived burdensomeness will moderate the relationship between psychological distress and suicidal ideation.

For the model incorporating PB, distress and SI, there was significant effect with F(3,466) = 189.23, p < .001, R2 = 0.55 as seen in Table 4. The interaction of psychological distress and PB also showed a significance effect at ΔR2 = 0.02, F(1,466) = 21.25, p < .001.

An analysis of the conditional effects of the focal predictor at values of the moderator revealed as PB increases it strengthens the relationship between distress and suicidal ideation. This effect can be seen in the interaction plot which also showed that high PB is a stronger moderator when present with high distress (Fig. 4).

Hypothesis 3

Thwarted Belongingness will moderate the relationship between psychological distress and suicidal ideation.

For the model incorporating TB, psychological distress and suicidal ideation, there was a significant effect (Table 4), with F(3,397) = 92.41, p < .001, R2 = 0.41. The interaction of psychological distress and TB also showed a significance effect at ΔR2 = 0.05, F(1,397) = 31.49, p < .001.

An analysis of conditional effects of distress at values of TB indicated that the presence of low, medium and high levels of TB were irrelevant when distress was low. Figure 5 displays the enhancing effects of TB on distress showing that the relationship between distress and ideation becomes stronger as TB increases.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Regression coefficients for the relationship between distress and suicide ideation as mediated by PB

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure 3

Regression coefficients for the relationship between distress and suicide ideation as mediated by TB

Full size image
Fig. 4
figure 4

The effect of perceived burdensomeness (PB) on the relationship between psychological distress and suicide ideation. All variables were standardised to mean 0, standard deviation

Full size image
Fig. 5
figure 5

The moderating effect of thwarted belongingness (TB) on the relationship between psychological distress and suicide ideation. All variables were standardised to mean 0, standard deviation ± 1

Full size image

Hypothesis 4 and Hypothesis 5

Perceived burdensomeness and Thwarted Belongingness Will Mediate Psychological Distress and Suicide Ideation.

To test the hypotheses that PB and TB mediated the relationship between psychological distress and suicide ideation an analysis using PROCESS (Model 4) [33] in SPSS was conducted for each of the mediators with 5000 bootstrapped samples. PB was a significant mediator of distress, with an indirect effect of 0.34, 95%CI (0.25, 0.42). The mediating effect of TB was also significant at 0.09, 95%CI (0.04, 0.14), while weaker than PB (see Figs. 4 and 5).

Discussion

The current study investigated whether the relationship between psychological distress and suicidal ideation was mediated and/or moderated by perceived burdensomeness (PB) and thwarted belongingness (TB). All hypotheses were supported. As expected, distress was positively linked to SI. PB and TB both moderated and mediated the relationship between distress and SI. Specifically, distress was more strongly linked to SI when PB or TB were also high. The moderating effect of TB was stronger than PB, while the mediating effect of PB was stronger than TB (very small mediating effect). These findings are consistent with the ‘motivational moderator’ components of the integrated motivational-volitional theory (IMV) of suicidal behaviour [14], as well as the interpersonal and three-step theories of suicide [15, 23]. The results confirm that, in an Australian community sample, feelings of social disconnection and perceived burden intensify the link between distress and SI. Consistent with earlier research, [34–36] age was negatively associated with distress and SI, but also with TB and PB; in contrast with some studies that have associated PB more with older age [37, 38]. Although Australian population health data has shown that levels of distress and SI are higher in women, [2] no gender differences were found here.

These findings add nuance to previous relationships found between distress, TB, PB and SI. Compared to TB, PB formed a stronger bridge between psychological distress and suicidal ideation as a mediator. As suggested by the ‘differential activation hypothesis,’ [39] high levels of distress may prime feelings of perceived burdensomeness, which in turn lead to thoughts of suicide. According to the IMV model of suicide, such pathways can become reinforced over time, such that each new episode of distress facilitates a quicker transition to thoughts of suicide, via the previously-primed PB. [14] Given the negative associations previously found between PB, SI, and help-seeking intent, [13, 40] such findings have important suicide risk implications for people experiencing high levels of PB, which may hinder support-seeking during times of crisis. Cognitive-behavioural interventions that focus on reducing PB may be effective in disrupting these pathways, [41, 42] allowing people experiencing high levels of distress to question their thought processes and marshal alternate coping resources. While TB was a significant mediator, the effect was small. This is consistent with cross-sectional findings where TB is more weakly related to SI than PB [17]. It has also been suggested that the Interpersonal Needs Questionnaire may not fully capture the TB construct [43].

In contrast to the mediation effects found, TB was a stronger moderator of the distress-SI relationship than PB. High distress in combination with high TB was associated with higher SI, suggesting that participants experiencing greater levels of distress regarding the quality of their interpersonal connections feel more intensely suicidal. This relationship may be bi-directional, with higher levels of distress driving an increased sense of isolation, [44] or social withdrawal acting as an expression of distress. For example, distress may cause reduced interaction with others, leading to increased social isolation and the sense of being alone [45]. The odds of a suicide attempt or death are reduced as the number of a person’s social connections increase, [21] highlighting the importance of social supports in reducing suicide risk. While informal supports can sometimes encourage help-seeking, [46] people experiencing high levels of distress and SI may be unwilling to disclose such thoughts to loved ones, out of concerns about being a burden or not fully understood [47]. Online peer support services have the potential to fill this gap, [48, 49] allowing people at risk of suicide to experience a person-centred connection while safely disclosing and working through their suicidal thoughts.

Implications

Our results support the importance of using interpersonal factors to identify and assess risk of suicide more holistically and accurately. This is particularly important in the context of research that shows that about half of patients who attempt or die by suicide do not disclose suicidal thoughts [50, 51]. Clinical screening tools already in use such as K10 could potentially be augmented with brief measures of TB and PB (e.g., INQ-10) [22]. to more readily identify patients and clients with latent suicidal thinking. For services experiencing high levels of demand, such processes could be used as part of a ‘stepped care model’, a hierarchy of interventions matched to the person’s needs [52].

However, practitioners and services should be careful of approaching such assessments in a manner that is perceived by clients and patients as ‘thoughtless box-ticking’ [53]. Our findings emphasise that psychological distress and SI are linked and intensified by psychosocial factors that are intensely interpersonal: feelings of social disconnection, and perceived burden on others. This places an increased importance on the quality and strength of the therapeutic relationship which is encountered while suicidal, as this can have a significant impact on reducing thoughts of suicide [54].

Once suicidal thinking is identified, the most effective interventions focus directly on the drivers of the suicidal cognitions rather than broader symptoms of distress (Tarrier et al., 2008) [8]. A simple, effective intervention that can support the therapeutic alliance while strengthening suicide-related coping skills is the safety plan [55], a prioritised list of warning signs, coping strategies, and social supports that a person can use when suicidal thoughts intensify. Developed collaboratively, such plans have the potential to reduce suicidal thinking by naming and identifying TB and PB thinking patterns as warning signs, alongside internal coping strategies that can improve self-efficacy and counter such thinking [56]. The structured nature of a safety plan also helps practitioners and clients to easily identify gaps in their support network (e.g., lack of social supports or reasons for living) that may be exacerbating suicidal distress [57].

Our results also point to some differences in the ways TB and PB are involved in the distress/ ideation relationship. PB was more strongly involved as a mediator in the pathway, where increased distress lead to increased feeling of burdensomeness, and in turn increased SI. Increased TB was most relevant when distress was high, resulting in increased SI. As such, weakening the link between distress and feelings of burdensomeness may interrupt the pathway to SI, and have preventative benefit. Increasing belonging may be effective in clinical interventions of SI. These differences require further research.

Limitations and conclusions

Although the anonymous nature of the data collection utilised in this study may help to mitigate the potential of under-reporting, severity of ideation may still have been under-reported [57]. Assessments such as SIDAS which measure self-reported ideation over the past month [29] may not capture the full extent of SI when compared to momentary assessments, [58] and may not be an accurate indication of future suicide risk [57]. It must also be stated that as a cross-sectional study, causation cannot be concluded. As such, longitudinal and experimental research is needed.

The prolonged presence of suicidal thoughts is harmful to quality of life, and increases the risk of death by suicide over time. Identifying suicidal thinking patterns and their drivers early therefore forms a crucial part of suicide prevention efforts. The current study’s results shed further light on the important roles played by two motivational moderators of suicidal thinking: thwarted belongingness and perceived burdensomeness. Feelings of social disconnection and being a burden on others can take a person from a state of psychological distress into thinking about suicide, with these relationships becoming particularly strong as feelings of social disconnection increase. Brief screening tools and sensitive, person-centred approaches to explore these interpersonal factors may help to identify people at risk of suicide in situations where suicidal thoughts may not be freely disclosed. With the most effective interventions for suicide directly targeting suicidal cognitions, further research is needed to expand the range of available interventions that can address social disconnectedness and feelings of perceived burden.

Data Availability

Data sets are available on request from the corresponding author.

References

  1. WHO. (2021). Suicide fact sheet: https://www.who.int/news-room/factsheets/detail/suicide.

  2. AIHW. (2023). Suicide and self-harm monitoring: https://www.aihw.gov.au/suicide-self-harm-monitoring.

  3. Franklin JC, Ribeiro JD, Huang X, Musacchio KM, Fox KR, Kleiman EM, Jaroszewski AC, Nock MK, Bentley KH, Chang BP. Risk factors for suicidal thoughts and behaviors: a meta-analysis of 50 years of research. Psychol Bull. 2017;143(2):187–232. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000084.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Nock MK, Borges G, Bromet EJ, Cha CB, Kessler RC, Lee S. Suicide and suicidal behavior. Epidemiol Rev. 2008;30(1):133–54. https://doi.org/10.1093/epirev/mxn002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Simon GE, Rutter CM, Peterson D, Oliver M, Whiteside U, Operskalski B, Ludman EJ. Does response on the PHQ-9 Depression Questionnaire predict subsequent suicide attempt or suicide death? Psychiatric Serv. 2013;64(12):1195–202. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201200587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fairweather-Schmidt AK, Batterham PJ, Butterworth P, Nada-Raja S. The impact of suicidality on health-related quality of life: a latent growth curve analysis of community-based data. J Affect Disord. 2016;203:14–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2016.05.067.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. King CA, Horwitz A, Czyz E, Lindsay R. Suicide risk screening in Healthcare Settings: identifying males and females at risk. J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2017;24(1):8–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10880-017-9486-y.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Tarrier N, Taylor K, Gooding P. Cognitive-behavioral interventions to reduce suicide behavior: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Behav Modif. 2008;32(1):77–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445507304728.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Arvidsdotter T, Marklund B, Kylén S, Taft C, Ekman I. Understanding persons with psychological distress in primary health care. Scand J Caring Sci. 2016;30(4):687–94. https://doi.org/10.1111/scs.12289.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chamberlain P, Goldney R, Delfabbro P, Gill T, Dal Grande L. Suicidal ideation: the clinical utility of the K10. Crisis. 2009;30(1):39–42. https://doi.org/10.1027/0227-5910.30.1.39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. O’Connor SS, Beebe TJ, Lineberry TW, Jobes DA, Conrad AK. The association between the Kessler 10 and suicidality: a cross-sectional analysis. Compr Psychiatr. 2012;53(1):48–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2011.02.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Enticott J, Dawadi S, Shawyer F, Inder B, Fossey E, Teede H, Rosenberg S, Ozols Am I, Meadows G. Mental Health in Australia: psychological distress reported in six consecutive cross-sectional national surveys from 2001 to 2018. Front Psychiatry. 2022;13:815904. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.815904.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Rainbow C, Baldwin P, Hosking W, Gill P, Blashki G, Shand F. Psychological distress and suicidal ideation in australian online help-seekers: the mediating role of perceived burdensomeness. Archives of Suicide Research. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/13811118.2021.2020191.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. O’Connor RC, Kirtley OJ. The integrated motivational-volitional model of suicidal behaviour. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2018;373(1754):20170268. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0268.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Van Orden KA, Witte TK, Cukrowicz KC, Braithwaite SR, Selby EA, Joiner TE Jr. The interpersonal theory of suicide. Psychol Rev. 2010;117(2):575–600. https://doi.org/10.1037/a001869.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Ma J, Batterham PJ, Calear AL, Han J. A systematic review of the predictions of the interpersonal-psychological theory of suicidal behavior. Clin Psychol Rev. 2016;46:34–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2016.04.008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Chu C, Buchman-Schmitt JM, Stanley IH, Hom MA, Tucker RP, Hagan CR, Rogers ML, Podlogar MC, Chiurliza B, Ringer FB, Michaels MS, Patros CHG, Joiner TE Jr. The interpersonal theory of suicide: a systematic review and meta-analysis of a decade of cross-national research. Psychol Bull. 2017;143(12):1313–45. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000123.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Espinosa-Salido P, Perez Nieto MA, Baca-García E, Ortega MP. Systematic review of the indirect relationships of thwarted belongingness and perceived burdensomeness in suicide. Clínica y Salud Investigación Empírica En Psicología. 2021;32(1):29–36. https://doi.org/10.5093/clysa2020a27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Brenner LA, Gutierrez PM, Cornette MM, Betthauser LM, Bahraini N, Staves PJ. A qualitative study of potential suicide risk factors in returning combat veterans. J Mental Health Couns. 2008;30(3):211–25. https://doi.org/10.17744/mehc.30.3.n6418tm72231j606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Farrell AK, Stanton SCE, Sbarra DA. Good theories in need of Better Data: combining clinical and social psychological approaches to study the Mechanisms linking Relationships and Health. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2022;17(3):863–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916211027563.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Milner AJ, Niven H, Page K, LaMontagne AD. Suicide in veterinarians and veterinary nurses in Australia: 2001–2012. Aust Vet J. 2015;93(9):308–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/avj.12358.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hill RM, Rey Y, Marin CE, Sharp C, Green KL, Pettit JW. Evaluating the interpersonal needs questionnaire: comparison of the reliability, factor structure, and predictive validity across five versions. Suicide and Life Threatening Behavior. 2015;45(3):302–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Klonsky ED, May AM. The three-step theory (3ST): a new theory of suicide rooted in the ideation-to-action framework. Int J Cogn Therapy. 2015;8(2):114–29. https://doi.org/10.1521/ijct.2015.8.2.114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Joiner T. Why people die by suicide. Harvard University Press; 2005. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjghv2f.

  25. Law KC, Jin HM, Anestis MD. The intensity of suicidal ideation at the worst point and its association with suicide attempts. Psychiatry Res. 2018;269:524–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2018.08.094.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kleiman EM, Turner BJ, Fedor S, Beale EE, Huffman JC, Nock MK. (2017). Examination of real-time fluctuations in suicidal ideation and its risk factors: Results from two ecological momentary assessment studies. Journal of abnormal psychology, 126(6), 726–738. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn000027327. Kraiss, 2022.

  27. Bagge CL, Lamis DA, Nadorff M, Osman A. Relations between hopelessness, depressive symptoms and suicidality: mediation by reasons for living. J Clin Psychol. 2014;70(1):18–31. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Boas T, Christenson D, Glick D. Recruiting large online samples in the United States and India: Facebook, Mechanical Turk, and Qualtrics. Political Sci Res Methods. 2020;8(2):232–50. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2018.28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Van Spijker BAJ, Batterham PJ, Calear AL, Farrer L, Christensen H, Reynolds J, Kerkhof AJFM. The suicidal ideation attributes scale (sidas): community-based validation study of a new scale for the measurement of suicidal ideation. Suicide Life-Threat Behav. 2014;44(4):408–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kessler RC, Andrews G, Colpe LJ, Hiripi E, Mroczek DK, Normand S-LT, Walters EE, Zaslavsky AM. Short screening scales to monitor population prevalences and trends in non-specific psychological distress. Psychol Med (Print). 2002;32(6):959–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Van Orden KA, Cukrowicz KC, Witte TK, Joiner TE. Thwarted belongingness and perceived burdensomeness: construct validity and psychometric properties of the interpersonal needs questionnaire. Psychol Assess. 2012;24(1):197–215.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Darlington RB, Hayes AF. Regression analysis and linear models: concepts, applications, and implementation. New York: The Guilford Press; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Dennis M, Baillon S, Brugha T, Lindesay J, Stewart R, Meltzer H. The spectrum of suicidal ideation in Great Britain: comparisons across a 16–74 years age range. Psychol Med. 2007;37(6):795–805. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291707000013.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Vanyukov PM, Szanto K, Hallquist M, Moitra M, Dombrovski AY. Perceived burdensomeness is associated with low-lethality suicide attempts, dysfunctional interpersonal style, and younger rather than older age. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2017;32(7):788–97. https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.4526.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Collins KRL, Best I, Stritzke WGK, Page AC. Mindfulness and zest for life buffer the negative Effects of Experimentally-Induced Perceived Burdensomeness and thwarted belongingness: implications for theories of suicide. J Psychopathol Clin Sci. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Cukrowicz KC, Schlegel EF, Smith PN, Jacobs MP, Van Orden KA, Paukert AL, Pettit JW, Joiner TE. Suicide ideation among college students evidencing subclinical depression. J Am Coll Health: JACH. 2011;59(7):575–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2010.483710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Jahn DR, Cukrowicz KC. The impact of the nature of relationships on perceived burdensomeness and suicide ideation in a community sample of older adults. Suicide Life-Threat Behav. 2011;41(6):635–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1943-278X.2011.00060.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Lau MA, Segal ZV, Williams JM. Teasdale’s differential activation hypothesis: implications for mechanisms of depressive relapse and suicidal behaviour. Behav Res Ther. 2004;42(9):1001–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2004.03.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Tang Y, Masicampo EJ. Asian american college students, perceived burdensomeness, and willingness to seek help. Asian Am J Psychol. 2018;9(4):344–9. https://doi.org/10.1037/aap0000137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Allan NP, Boffa JW, Raines AM, Schmidt NB. Intervention related reductions in perceived burdensomeness mediates incidence of suicidal thoughts. J Affect Disord. 2018;234:282–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2018.02.084.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Hill RM, Pettit JW. Pilot randomized controlled trial of LEAP: a selective preventive intervention to reduce adolescents’ perceived burdensomeness. Journal of clinical child and adolescent psychology: the official journal for the society of clinical child and adolescent psychology, american Psychological Association. Division. 2019;53(sup1):45–S56. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2016.1188705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Hunt QA, Weiler LM, McGuire J, Mendenhall T, Kobak R, Diamond GS. Testing basic assumptions of the interpersonal needs questionnaire-15 in a sample of clinically depressed and suicidal youth. Suicide & Life Threat Behavior. 2020;50:372–86. https://doi.org/10.1111/sltb.12594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Mushtaq R, Shoib S, Shah T, Mushtaq S. Relationship between loneliness, psychiatric disorders and physical health ? A review on the psychological aspects of loneliness. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014;8(9). https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2014/10077.4828.

  44. Tajan N. Mental health and social withdrawal in contemporary Japan [electronic resource]. beyond the Hikikomori spectrum / Nicolas Tajan; 2021.

  45. Han J, Batterham PJ, Calear AL, Randall R. Factors influencing professional help-seeking for suicidality. Crisis. 2018;39(3):175–96. https://doi.org/10.1027/0227-5910/a000485.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Frey LM, Fulginiti A. Talking about suicide may not be enough: family reaction as a mediator between disclosure and interpersonal needs. J Ment Health. 2017;26(4):366–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638237.2017.1340592.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. McCosker A, Hartup ME. Turning to online peer forums for suicide and self-harm support. ‘It does help having you guys’; 2018.

  48. Kahl BL, Miller HM, Cairns K, Giniunas H, Nicholas M. (2020). Evaluation of ReachOut. Com, an unstructured digital youth mental health intervention: prospective cohort study. JMIR Mental Health, 7(10), e21280.

  49. Bjureberg J, Dahlin M, Carlborg A, Edberg H, Haglund A, Runeson B. Columbia-suicide severity rating scale screen version: initial screening for suicide risk in a psychiatric emergency department. Psychol Med. 2021;52(16):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291721000751. Advance online publication.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Bryan CJ, Thomsen CJ, Bryan AO, Baker JC, May AM, Allen MH. Scores on the suicide cognitions scale-revised (SCS-R) predict future suicide attempts among primary care patients denying suicide ideation and prior attempts. J Affect Disord. 2022;313:21–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2022.06.070.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Rainbow C, Blashki G, Melvin G. Reducing suicidal ideation in young adults: online tools to address perceived burdensomeness. Australian Psychol. 2023;58(1):1–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/00050067.2022.2135983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. House A. Self-harm and suicide in adults: will safety plans keep people safe after self-harm? BJPsych Bull. 2022;46(1):1–3. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjb.2020.150.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Dunster-Page C, Haddock G, Wainwright L, Berry K. The relationship between therapeutic alliance and patient’s suicidal thoughts, self-harming behaviours and suicide attempts: a systematic review. J Affect Disord. 2017;223:165–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2017.07.040.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Melvin GA, Gresham D, Beaton S, Coles J, Tonge BJ, Gordon MS, Stanley B. Evaluating the feasibility and effectiveness of an australian Safety Planning Smartphone Application: a pilot study within a tertiary mental health service. Suicide Life-Threat Behav. 2019;49(3):846–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/sltb.12490.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Rogers ML. Feasibility and acceptability of ecological momentary assessment in a fully online study of community-based adults at high risk for suicide. Psychol Assess. 2021;33(12):1215–25. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas000105457. Stanley & Brown, 2012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Stanley B, Brown GK. Safety planning intervention: a brief intervention to mitigate suicide risk. Cogn Behav Pract. 2012;19(2):256–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpra.2011.01.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Nock MK. Recent and needed advances in the understanding, Prediction, and Prevention of suicidal behavior. Depress Anxiety. 2016;33(6):460–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Gratch I, Choo T-H, Galfalvy H, Keilp JG, Itzhaky L, Mann JJ, Oquendo MA, Stanley B. Detecting suicidal thoughts: the power of ecological momentary assessment. Depress Anxiety. 2021;38(1):8–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.23043.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

No acknowledgements.

Funding

This research was supported by funding by College of Health and Biomedicine, Victoria University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute for Health and Sport, Victoria University, Footscray Park, Ballarat Rd, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

    Peter Richard Gill, Michael Arena, Warwick Hosking, Kim M Shearson, Gavin Ivey & Jenny Sharples

  2. Centre for Social and Early Emotional Development (SEED), School of Psychology, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia

    Christopher Rainbow

Authors
  1. Peter Richard Gill
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michael Arena
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Christopher Rainbow
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Warwick Hosking
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Kim M Shearson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Gavin Ivey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Jenny Sharples
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

PG, WH, KS, GI, JS, CR designed the study and collected data. MA analysed the data. All authors were involved in preparing drafts and the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Richard Gill.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Victoria University Human Research Ethics Committee (HRE21-051) approved this study, and the study was conducted according to NHMRC guidelines and the Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent was obtained from participants.

Consent to publication

Not applicable.

Conflicts of interests

None to declare.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gill, P.R., Arena, M., Rainbow, C. et al. Social connectedness and suicidal ideation: the roles of perceived burdensomeness and thwarted belongingness in the distress to suicidal ideation pathway. BMC Psychol 11, 312 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-023-01338-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-023-01338-5

Keywords

BMC Psychology

ISSN: 2050-7283

Contact us