Skip to main content
Download PDF

Dedifferentiated fat cells: current applications and future directions in regenerative medicine

Stem Cell Research & Therapy volume 14, Article number: 207 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Stem cell therapy is the most promising treatment option for regenerative medicine. Therapeutic effect of different stem cells has been verified in various disease model. Dedifferentiated fat (DFAT) cells, derived from mature adipocytes, are induced pluripotent stem cells. Compared with ASCs and other stem cells, the DFAT cells have unique advantageous characteristics in their abundant sources, high homogeneity, easily harvest and low immunogenicity. The DFAT cells have shown great potential in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine for the treatment of clinical problems such as cardiac and kidney diseases, autoimmune disease, soft and hard tissue defect. In this review, we summarize the current understanding of DFAT cell properties and focus on the relevant practical applications of DFAT cells in cell therapy in recent years.

Introduction

In recent years, stem cell-based therapeutics have gained great attention due to their wide applications in various degenerative diseases, injuries, and other health-related conditions. Stem cells from different origins, including bone marrow stem cells (BMSCs), cord blood- or adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells (ASCs), embryonic stem cells (ESCs), and more recently, induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), have been widely reported in many preclinical and clinical studies with some promising results. [1,2,3]. BMSCs and ASCs are the most popular source of stem cells in current stem cell therapy and tissue engineering research [4]. Yet, BMSCs and ASCs still have their own limitations. For example, the process of bone marrow aspiration is invasive and yields a limited quantity of cells, which is far from adequate for therapy [1,2,3,4], and BMSCs are prone to aging after in vitro passage [5]. In the meantime, ASCs can be harvested in a minimally invasive manner. However, ASCs are a heterogeneous cell population [6]. Using a heterogeneous cell population that contains cells at various differentiation stages leads to variations in research and transplantation outcomes.

Dedifferentiated fat (DFAT) cells are derived from the most abundant mature adipocytes in the human body by in vitro “ceiling culture” and have characteristics similar to those of adult stem cells [7,8,9]. Existing studies have shown that DFAT cells have the characteristics of abundant sources, high homogeneity, strong proliferation ability, adipogenic and osteogenic abilities, low requirements for donor age, and low immunogenicity [8,9,10,11]. Compared with adult stem cells such as BMSCs and ASCs, it can better meet the needs of stem cell transplantation therapy and industrial production. This article summarizes the research progress of DFAT cells from the aspects of the source, biological characteristics, and related application research of cell therapy.

Mature adipocyte

The source of DFAT cells is mainly mature adipocytes (MAs) distributed in subcutaneous adipose tissue throughout the body. Subcutaneous white adipose tissue (WAT) could be harvested easily through liposuction and processed into DFAT cells (Fig. 1) [12]. MAs constitute approximately one-third of the cells within WAT that form a storage unit for energy in the form of triglycerides (synthesized from fatty acids) that are packaged into lipid droplets, and that secrete adipokines to regulate animal physiology [13,14,15,16]. Adipocytes are plastic and, in response to changes in metabolism, they may change their size, cellular function and even their identity [17,18,19]. Notably, numerous studies in recent years have observed that adipocyte dedifferentiation and transdifferentiation occur under certain pathophysiological conditions [20,21,22]. For instance, it has been observed that MAs can be triggered to undergo a thermogenic transformation, resulting in the emergence of beige adipocytes, through exposure to prolonged cold or stimulation of beta-adrenergic receptors, a process commonly referred to as "browning" [23]. Conversely, under conditions of ischemic hypoxia or mechanical stress, MAs are capable of undergoing dedifferentiation into preadipocyte-like cells. [24,25,26]. Under physiological conditions, adipocytes in mammary glands can undergo lipid loss and revert to preadipocyte-like cells during late pregnancy and lactation [27]. These findings demonstrate that MAs have high plasticity and could undergo dedifferentiation under certain stimuli and induction.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Subcutaneous white adipose tissue (WAT) harvesting and white adipocyte isolation. a Harvesting WAT from the clinic; b Enzymatic digestion; c Centrifuge fat; d Isolating white adipocyte. In Fig. 1, all the images except for "the skin structure" sourced from https://biorender.com/ were self-described

Full size image

Induction and identification of DFAT cells

Induction of DFAT cells

The “ceiling culture” of MAs for the induction of DFAT cells was first proposed by Sugihara in 1986 [28]. Unlike most cell types, MAs are floating cells during in vitro culturing, and the adipocytes would adhere to the upper wall of the culture flask. During ceiling culturing, it was found that adipocytes gradually shed lipid droplets and become fibroblast-like DFAT cells [11].

Different culture systems to induce DFAT cells are shown in Fig. 2. In the standard celling protocol (Fig. 2A), adipose tissue is minced into small pieces and then dissociated in a 0.1% (w/v) collagenase type I solution at 37 °C for 1 h with gentle agitation. The cell suspension is filtered with a nylon mesh to allow cells to pass through and exclude unwanted tissue remnants. The cell filtrate is centrifuged at 135 g for 3 min to separate cells of the adipose tissue into an upper layer containing MAs and a bottom layer containing cells of the stromal vascular fraction (SVF). MAs remaining afloat on the top layer are collected and seeded in a cell culture flask that is completely filled with Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium supplemented with 20% (v/v) fetal bovine serum (FBS). The fat cells are then incubated at 37 °C with 5% CO2. After the cells were firmly attached and fibroblast-like cells were observed (about 7d), fresh medium is added to barely cover the bottom of the flask to allow cells to continue their expansion [8, 11, 29,30,31]. According to a previous study [11], it was found that 5 × 104 mature adipocytes can be expanded to produce 3 × 106 DFAT cells. Considering clinical and feasibility aspects, it is possible to isolate sufficient DFAT cells from less than 0.1 g (or 100 mg) of subcutaneous adipose tissue in humans, which yields 4–6 × 106 mature adipocytes. The doubling time of DFAT cells was observed to be 65 h at passage 2, which decreases to 48 h at passage 10. DFAT cells demonstrate persistent proliferative potential even at passage 11, with a low frequency of cellular senescence. However, the proliferative capacity of DFAT cells isolated from donors over the age of 70 years old may be decreased. Despite this, successful expansion of DFAT cells has been reported for a wide range of donor ages, ranging from 4 to 81 years old [11].

Fig. 2
figure 2

The method of classic “ceiling culture” and its offshoots. A system “ceiling culture”: mature adipocytes (MAs) are seeded in a cell culture flask that is completely filled with medium. After 7 days of cell attachment, the flask was inverted and fresh medium was added to barely cover the bottom of the flask to allow cells to continue to grow; B Preincubation and filter: After a 24-h floating culture period, MAs were transferred to a new petri dish equipped with a 70-μm cell filter. Subsequently, the DFAT cells gradually migrated through the filter and adhered to the bottom of the dish, where they grew and expanded; C Early differential plating: After 1–2 d of ceiling culture, mature adipocytes will be floating in the medium but non–lipid containing cells will attach to the bottom surface. Then floating mature adipocytes in the medium are transferred to the new flask leaving the attached contaminating cells behind; D Late differential plating: Mature adipocytes adhere to the top surface after 3–4 d of ceiling culture. Then the medium is removed and the trypsin of the adherent mature adipocytes are digested and centrifuged, to eliminate the contaminating cells culturing along with mature adipocytes by the buoyant nature of adipocytes. The images presented in Fig. 2 were generated and illustrated by the author

Full size image

Besides the standard “ceiling culture” system described previously, several groups developed modified approaches to study DFAT cells. Jumabay et al. described an alternative method for isolating DFAT cells that does not involve the use of ceiling culture (Fig. 2B). Adipocytes were harvested from the tissue and incubated in culture medium for 24 h, following which the cells were transferred to a new dish with a 70 mm insert filter. The DFAT cells derived from the adipocytes were allowed to sink through the filter and were collected after 5 days. The inclusion of these additional steps not only enhances the purity of DFAT cells but also significantly increases the early expression of pluripotency markers [33].

Prior to this, Fernyhough et al. had investigated several techniques, including differential plating (Fig. 2C, D), to improve the purity of DFAT cells. Differential plating is based on the differential attachment times of mature adipocytes and other cell types to the culture flask, thereby enabling the separation of contaminating cells. After 1–2 days of ceiling culture, mature adipocytes are suspended in the medium while non-lipid-containing cells attach to the bottom surface. In early differential plating (Fig. 2C), the mature adipocytes in the medium are transferred to a new flask, leaving the attached contaminating cells behind. Following 3–4 days of ceiling culture, mature adipocytes adhere to the top surface. In late differential plating (Fig. 2D), the cells attached to the ceiling are trypsinized and centrifuged after 3–4 days of ceiling culture to eliminate the contaminating cells that have been culturing along with the mature adipocytes due to the buoyant nature of adipocytes [32]. This protocol, by taking advantage of the increased time needed for adipocyte adherence compared to the contaminating SVF, allows the generation of a pure population of DFAT cells. The models developed by Jumabay [33] and Fernyhough [32] are likely to increase the homogeneity of DFAT cells. Despite the advancements in isolation techniques, obtaining a pure population of adipocytes for downstream DFAT cell production remains a challenge. Ensuring high purity of DFAT cells is essential for their clinical application in the future.

Identification of DFAT cells

At present, the phenotype and specific surface markers for DFAT cells are controversial. Current studies suggested that DFAT cells are positive for CD13, CD29, CD44, CD49d, CD73, CD90, and CD105, and negative for CD11b,CD14, CD31, CD34, CD45, CD106, and HLA-DR [34] (Table 1). DFAT cells, ASCs, and other types of MSCs have similar surface markers, but there may be some differences in their expression levels. MSCs, including adipose-derived stem cells, express CD105, CD73, and CD90, but lack the expression of CD45, CD34, CD14, CD11b, CD79a, CD19, and HLA-DR. These markers are considered to be characteristic of MSCs and are used to identify them [34]. DFAT cells are a subtype of adipose-derived stem cells that have been dedifferentiated from mature adipocytes. DFAT cells have been found to express similar surface markers to adipose-derived stem cells, including CD105, CD73, and CD90, but may also express some markers that are not typically found in other MSCs, such as CD36 and CD10 [7]. In addition, DFAT cells have a higher expression of the hematopoietic progenitor marker CD34 and pericyte markers NG2 and α-SMA compared to ASCs, possibly due to their origin from the vascular stromal fraction of adipose tissue that is enriched in pericytes [35, 36].

Table 1 Surface markers for identification of DFAT cells
Full size table

Overall, while there is some overlap in surface marker expression between DFAT cells, ASCs, and other types of MSCs, there are also differences that reflect their tissue-specific origin and potentially different functional properties.

DFAT cells have been reported to express several markers typically associated with ESCs, including Oct4, SOX2, c-Myc, and Nanog, which are known to play a critical role in maintaining pluripotency [37]. Moreover, DFAT cells also exhibit high alkaline phosphatase and telomerase activity, providing additional evidence of their similarities to undifferentiated pluripotent stem cells. However, it has been observed that the expression of pluripotency markers in DFAT cells decreases significantly after being cultured for more than two weeks. Previous studies that have focused on specific lineages may have overlooked the early expression of pluripotency markers in DFAT cells, potentially leading to the underestimation of their pluripotent potential [38,39,40]. Matsumoto et al. discovered that, similar to BMSCs and ASCs, DFAT cells express only HLA-ABC and not HLA-DR [11].

Thus, owing to their favorable safety profile and diminished immunogenicity, DFAT cells may present an appealing mesenchymal source for a range of cell-based therapies and tissue engineering applications.

Function of DFAT cells

Multilineage potential of DFAT cells

It is widely believed that DFAT cells could redifferentiate in cells belonging to this lineage (adipocytes, osteoblasts, chondrocytes) and therefore might be characterized as multipotent [41,42,43].In addition to the above differentiation directions, the study by Kazama et al. shows that the regulatory region of MYOD1, a master regulator for skeletal myogenesis, in DFAT cells is highly methylated [44]. However, treatment with a demethylating agent, 5-azacytidine, led to the expression of MYOD1 and MYOG in DFAT cells, as well as the formation of multinucleated cells expressing MUTYH, indicating muscle lineage differentiation [44]. Another study demonstrated that DFAT cells could differentiate into smooth muscle cells when cultured with DMEM containing 5% FCS and 5 ng/ml TGF (transforming growth factor)-β1. The expressions of TAGLN2, α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA), and smooth muscle-myosin heavy chain were increased in DFAT cells during the first week of differentiation culture [45]. Furthermore, the article discusses how DFAT cells could differentiate into cardiomyocytes when cultured alongside neonatal cardiomyocytes or grown on semi-solid methylcellulose medium. DFAT cells were found to express specific markers indicative of cardiomyocyte differentiation, including GATA4 and Nkx2.5 nuclear proteins, cardiac sarcomeric actin, and troponin-T [46]. Taken together, the findings suggest that DFAT cells have the potential to differentiate into multiple cell lineages, indicating that DFAT cells are pluripotent [35, 47, 48].

Secretory abilities of DFAT cells

Similar to other stem cells, DFAT cells have a powerful secretory function. Perrini et al. demonstrated that DFAT cells from obese individuals were able to secrete multiple cytokines and growth factors, including interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-1ra, IL-6, IL-8, IL-15, IL-17, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), interferon (IFN)-γ, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, eotaxin, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP1), and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) [49]. Poloni et al. obtained similar results using DFAT cells from nonobese individuals [50]. The secretome of DFAT cells would be altered under different conditions. Watanabe et al. found that DFAT cells could secrete large amounts of angiogenic factors such as VEGF and hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) when cultured under hypoxic conditions, and the secretion amount was significantly higher than that of ASCs and fibroblasts. When co-cultured with endothelial cells, DFAT cells further enhanced the expression of several angiogenic factors like HGF, TGF-β, and fibroblast growth factor 2 while the gene expression of mature pericyte-specific markers (α-SMA, NG2 and PDGFRβ) was largely increased [51]. The secretory profile of DFAT cells includes a wide range of cytokines[49], and under specific media conditions, DFAT cells secrete related proteins to promote recovery from lesion models, demonstrating the potential therapeutic effect of DFAT cells for regenerative medicine and tissue engineering.

Regenerative medicine based on DFAT cells

Owing to their capacity for multilineage differentiation and secretory activities, DFAT cells hold great promise for therapeutic applications in a range of degenerative and injury-related disorders. Here, we summarized the recent research developments concerning the use of DFAT cells in diverse animal models of disease, as presented in Table 2. Table 2 covers the application indication, cell sources (adipocytes from rat, mouse, rabbit, and human), routes of administration (surgical implantation, local injection, intravenous injection, etc.), and therapeutic results. Despite the encouraging preclinical results, clinical trials of DFAT cells remain limited at present.

Table 2 Summary of in vivo application of DFAT cells in animal disease model
Full size table

Bone regeneration

The bone regeneration strategies based on DFAT cells have great potential as DFAT cells can differentiate into osteoblasts [52]. Compared with ASCs isolated from BFP, the DFAT cells had higher osteoblastic differentiation markers such as bone- specific alkaline phosphatase (ALP), osteocalcin, and calcium deposition [53]. Tsurumachi et al. found that the dedifferentiation efficiency of mature adipocytes was size-dependent. DFAT cells from small adipocytes exhibited higher osteogenic potential than those from large adipocytes [54]. Bone regeneration involves a complex interaction between DFAT cells and biological factors [55]. DFAT cells undergo osteogenic differentiation by the stimulated of retinoic acid, an analogue of retinol that interacts with bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) to limit adipogenesis and promote osteogenesis [43]. Fujisaki et al. found that in the process of osteogenesis, BMP-2 stimulated DFAT cells and ASCs in different pathways, respectively. BMP-2 activated the phosphorylation for the expression of ERK1/2 and Smad2 in DFAT cells during osteogenesis, instead of Smad1/5 in ASCs [56]. Additionally, epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) also affected the production of osteogenic factors [57]. To be ideal bone graft substitutes, scaffolds must be biodegradable and biocompatible and exhibit strong osteoinductive properties. Some studies reported that DFAT cells maintained well osteogenic differentiation ability in polylactic acid-glycolic acid/hydroxyapatite (PLGA/HA), β-tricalcium phosphate/type I collagen, and gelatin sponges [58,59,60]. Even without scaffolding, DFAT cells promote osteoblast differentiation and new bone formation by establishing three-dimensional (3D) spheroid [61].

Cartilage repair

Repair of cartilage injury or intervertebral disc degenerative disease is a major problem owing to the weak self-healing ability of cartilage tissue [62]. DFAT cells with chondrogenic differentiation potential have attracted the attention of researchers. In vitro studies have showed that chondrogenic induction was facilitated by the addition of L-ascorbic acid-2-phosphate, proline, pyruvate, and TGF-β3 [60]. However, in the process of inducing DFAT cells to differentiate into cartilage, there is no effective induction method so far. Okita et al. found that adding an appropriate amount of strontium ions (Sr) to the chondrogenesis-inducing medium significantly promoted the early differentiation of DFAT cells into chondrocytes [63]. This may be a feasible method to enhances the differentiation of DFAT cells into cartilage for cartilage regeneration therapy. Nakayama et al. found that DFAT cells injected into the intervertebral disc could form a nucleus pulposus (NP)-like matrix in the outer layer of the annulus fibrosus. DFAT cells directly differentiated into NP-like cells and induce ectopic formation of NP-like tissue to enhance the regeneration of the intervertebral disc [64]. Currently, few studies tried to combine DFAT cells with scaffolds, which will be a potential direction of cartilage regeneration medicine in the future.

Myocardium repair

Cardiovascular disease(CVD) is the leading cause of death globally and can lead to ischemia in critical regions [65]. DFAT cells expressed cardiac phenotype markers (Nkx2.5, troponin-T, GATA4, and cardiac actin) when co-cultured with cardiomyocytes and also when grown in MethoCult medium in the absence of cardiomyocytes. In a mouse model of acute myocardial infarction, intramyocardially injected DFAT cells accumulated and expressed myocardial sarcomeric proteins in the infarcted myocardium and form myotube-like structures. Concurrently, there was a significant increase in capillary density within the infarcted area. [46]. These results demonstrated that DFAT cells have the ability to differentiate to cardiomyocyte-like cells in vitro and in vivo, suggesting that DFAT cells represent a promising candidate cell source for cardiomyocyte regeneration in severe ischemic heart disease [46].

Muscle regeneration

Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is a common type of incontinence in women [66]. Rat models of vaginal distension (VD) have been utilized to replicate the symptoms of SUI, as this technique leads to the destruction and degeneration of the urethral sphincter, which is composed of both striated and smooth muscle [67]. DFAT cell transplantation has been shown to recruit macrophages to facilitate the thickening of the striated muscle layer, and to directly differentiate into smooth muscle cell (SMC) phenotypes to promote the thickening of the smooth muscle layer [68]. DFAT cells could differentiate into smooth muscle cells in cryo-injured bladder, which was helpful for the regeneration of the injured bladder tissue [43]. Ikado et al. found in a severe vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) model (the model did not cause damage to the smooth muscle tissue at the vesicoureteral junction) that transplanted DFAT cells effectively inhibited VUR-induced tissue damage, such as ureteral dilatation and renal cell apoptosis to exerted nephro protective effects [69].

Blood vessel regeneration

The lack of blood perfusion ultimately limits tissue function. Watanabe et al. confirmed the possibility that DFAT cells could differentiate into pericyte-like cells via the TGF-β1-Smad2/3 signal transduction pathway and secretion of angiogenic factors when co-cultured with endothelial cells [51]. Blood flow to ischemic muscle tissue was significantly improved after DFAT cell transplantation. This was accompanied by an increase in the density of mature blood vessels that are positive for both IB4 and α-SMA, indicating that DFAT cells have the potential to augment neovascularization and promote vessel maturation [36, 51]. The capacity of DFAT cells to differentiate directly into SMC phenotype might also underlie the observed functional recovery of ischemic muscle tissue [68]. Soejim et al. and Asami et al. both demonstrated that mixing DFAT cells with basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) in artificial dermis (AD) transplantation/full-thickness skin grafts considerably shortened the time required for angiogenesis and skin regeneration [70, 71]. What’s more, DFAT cells can directly differentiate into endothelial cells, which greatly enhance the vascularization of the flap graft area and promotes flap survival [72].

Nervous system regeneration

Cerebral ischemia is a common clinical disease in which partial or complete interruption of local blood flow in the brain and a series of pathological and biochemical events lead to neurological and motor dysfunction [73]. Studies showed that DFAT cells may have a better ability to differentiate into oligodendrocytes, astrocytes, and neuron-like cells in comparison with ASCs [74]. Mikrogeorgiou et al. found that, DFAT cells can cut down acute injury markers, and release of neurotrophic factors (IGF-1 and NGF) to reduce neuronal apoptosis. Intravenously injected DFAT cells restores a part of cerebral cortical function, but does not reduce the cerebral infarct area [75]. Moreover, labeled DFAT is mainly distributed in other organs, such as spleen, lung and liver, considering future transplantation methods such as intra-arterial or intracerebral administration rather than intravenous administration [75, 76]. Yamada et al. pointed out that DFAT cells may enhance neuroremyelination and inhibit glial scar formation in spinal cord injury (SCI) mice through cell-autonomous and non-autonomous effects while improving the limb movement ability after SCI [77].

Recent studies have reported that DFAT cells can differentiate into Schwanncells and facilitate native Schwann cell activity [78]. To bridge nerve defects, scientists have focused on nerve conduits combined with DFAT cells [79]. Matsumine et al. filled DFAT cells in silicone tubes and transplanted them into a rat model with a 7 mm defect in the buccal branch of the facial nerve. The nerve fiber diameter, axon diameter and myelin thickness in the DFAT cell transplantation group were significantly higher than those in the control group. Moreover, the immunocolocalization results indicated that the regenerated nerves in the DFAT cell group had Schwann-like supportive cells that were double positive for S100 and GFP [78]. Now polyglycolic acid (PGA) conduit can further promote the neurite regeneration ability of DFAT cells [80].

Regulation of autoimmune diseases

Autoimmune diseases are a class of diseases in which the immune balance of the body is disrupted, causing damage to the body, including systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), etc. [81]. Various studies have demonstrated the potential role of DFAT cells in regulating inflammation. Ishioka et al. conducted co-culture experiments involving CD3 + T cells and DFAT cells, where they observed that DFAT cells could inhibit T cell proliferation in a density-dependent manner. The expression of genes responsible for immunosuppression, namely HGF, TRAIL, IDO1, Ptgs2, and NOS2, was significantly increased in DFAT cells when exposed to proinflammatory factors like IFNγ, IFNβ, or TNFα, particularly TNFα. These findings suggest that DFAT cells possess the potential to modulate the immune response and suppress T cell proliferation [82]. In the context of lupus nephritis, abnormal regulation of renal inflammation can lead to glomerular damage and reduced renal function [83]. To evaluate the therapeutic potential of DFAT cells in treating kidney injuries, a study was conducted where DFAT cells were transplanted into a kidney injury model. The results showed that transplantation of DFAT cells could reduce tissue inflammatory response and improve renal insufficiency by inhibiting the TNF-stimulated gene (TSG-6)-mediated immune response [84]. Furthermore, in another study, the positive therapeutic effect of DFAT cell transplantation was investigated in the context of renal dysfunction induced by habu snake venom (HSV). The findings indicated that transplantation of DFAT cells could alleviate the adverse effects of HSV-induced renal dysfunction [85].

Application of dentistry

Periodontal defects are primarily caused by periodontal disease and trauma, resulting in the loss of cementum and alveolar bone tissue [86]. Recent studies have investigated the potential of utilizing DFAT cells to promote periodontal tissue regeneration. Specifically, when DFAT cells were transplanted into a periodontal tissue defect model in combination with atelocollagen scaffolds or PLGA, the transplanted DFAT cells demonstrated active proliferation and were able to promote the regeneration of alveolar bone, periodontal ligament, and cementum. As a result, the regenerated periodontium exhibited a similar architectural arrangement to the original tissue [87, 88]. Notably, DFAT cells were found to have greater potential for promoting periodontal tissue regeneration than ASCs [88].

Conclusion

DFAT cells are derived from mature adipocytes and can be conveniently obtained via standard or optimized “ceiling culturing” techniques. DFAT cells demonstrate a high degree of homogeneity and express typical stem cell surface markers such as CD13, CD29, CD44, CD49d, CD73, CD90, and CD105. With the ability of multilineage differentiation and potent secretory function, DFAT cells will be the promising candidates for tissue regeneration engineering and regenerative medicine, applied to the treatment of clinical problems such as cardiac and kidney diseases, autoimmune disease, soft and hard tissue defects (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Schematic representation of the potential uses of DFAT cells in regenerative medicine. CVD: cardiovascular disease; IBD: inflammatory bowel disease; SUI: stress urinary incontinence; VUR: vesicoureteral reflux; SCI: spinal cord injury. In Fig. 3, all the images except for "the skin structure" sourced from https://biorender.com/ were self-described

Full size image

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

DFAT:

Dedifferentiated fat

BMSCs:

Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells

ASCs:

Adipose-derived stem cells

ESCs:

Embryonic stem cells

iPSCs:

Induced pluripotent stem cells

MAs:

Mature adipocytes

SVF:

Stromal vascular fraction

FBS:

Fetal bovine serum

UC-MSCs:

Umbilical cord-derived MSCs

TGF:

Transforming growth factor

CD:

Clusters of differentiation

α-SMA:

α-Smooth muscle actin

IL:

Interleukin

G-CSF:

Granulocyte colony stimulating factor

FN:

Interferon

TNF:

Tumor necrosis factor

MCP1:

Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1

VEGF:

Vascular endothelial growth factor

HGF:

Hepatocyte growth factor

BTE:

Bone tissue engineering

BFP:

Buccal fat pad

ALP:

Alkaline phosphatase

BMP:

Bone morphogenetic protein

aPRP:

Activated platelet-rich plasma

PLGA/HA:

Polylactic acid-glycolic acid/hydroxyapatite

TEB:

Tissue engineered bone

2D/3D:

Two or three-dimensional

IFP:

Infrapatellar fat pad

SC:

Subcutaneous adipose tissue

Sr:

Strontium ions

NP:

Nucleus pulposus

IDD:

Intervertebral disc degeneration

CVD:

Cardiovascular disease

MI:

Myocardial infarction

LPP:

Leak point pressure

VD:

Vaginal dilation

SMC:

Smooth muscle cell

VUR:

Vesicoureteral reflux

GFP:

Green fluorescence protein

IB4:

Isolectin β4

PAD:

Peripheral artery disease

ASO:

Atherosclerosis obliterans

CLI:

Limb ischemia

bFGF:

Basic fibroblast growth factor

AD:

Artificial dermis

IGF-1:

Insulin-like growth factor

NGF:

Nerve growth factor

SCI:

Spinal cord injury

SLE:

Systemic lupus erythematosus

RA:

Rheumatoid arthritis

IBD:

Inflammatory bowel disease

Th17:

T helper cell 17

Treg:

T regulatory cells

TSG:

TNF-stimulated gene

HSV:

Habu snake venom

PGA:

Polyglycolic acid

References

  1. Cable J, Fuchs E, Weissman I, et al. Adult stem cells and regenerative medicine-a symposium report. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2020;1462(1):27–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Guess AJ, Daneault B, Wang R, et al. Safety profile of good manufacturing practice manufactured interferon γ-primed mesenchymal stem/stromal cells for clinical trials. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2017;6(10):1868–79.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Carriel V, Geuna S, Alaminos M. Ex vivo and in vivo stem cells-based tissue engineering strategies for their use in regenerative medicine. Stem Cells Int. 2018;2018:7143930.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Luzzani CD, Miriuka SG. Pluripotent stem cells as a robust source of mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cell Rev Rep. 2017;13(1):68–78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rebelatto CK, Aguiar AM, Moretão MP, et al. Dissimilar differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells from bone marrow, umbilical cord blood, and adipose tissue. Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2008;233(7):901–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kunze KN, Burnett RA, Wright-Chisem J, Frank RM, Chahla J. Adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cell treatments and available formulations. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2020;13(3):264–80.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Ong WK, Chakraborty S, Sugii S. Adipose tissue: understanding the heterogeneity of stem cells for regenerative medicine. Biomolecules. 2021;11(7):918.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Kishimoto N, Honda Y, Momota Y, Tran SD. Dedifferentiated fat (DFAT) cells: a cell source for oral and maxillofacial tissue engineering. Oral Dis. 2018;24(7):1161–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wei S, Du M, Jiang Z, et al. Bovine dedifferentiated adipose tissue (DFAT) cells: DFAT cell isolation. Adipocyte. 2013;2(3):148–59.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Wei S, Zan L, Hausman GJ, et al. Dedifferentiated adipocyte-derived progeny cells (DFAT cells): potential stem cells of adipose tissue. Adipocyte. 2013;2(3):1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Matsumoto T, Kano K, Kondo D, et al. Mature adipocyte-derived dedifferentiated fat cells exhibit multilineage potential. J Cell Physiol. 2008;215(3):210–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rosen ED, Spiegelman BM. What we talk about when we talk about fat. Cell. 2014;156(1–2):20–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Farmer SR. Transcriptional control of adipocyte formation. Cell Metab. 2006;4(4):263–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Rosen ED, MacDougald OA. Adipocyte differentiation from the inside out. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2006;7(12):885–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cao H, Gerhold K, Mayers JR, Wiest MM, Watkins SM, Hotamisligil GS. Identification of a lipokine, a lipid hormone linking adipose tissue to systemic metabolism. Cell. 2008;134(6):933–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Olefsky JM. Fat talks, liver and muscle listen. Cell. 2008;134(6):914–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tchoukalova YD, Votruba SB, Tchkonia T, Giorgadze N, Kirkland JL, Jensen MD. Regional differences in cellular mechanisms of adipose tissue gain with overfeeding. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(42):18226–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Cinti S, Mitchell G, Barbatelli G, Murano I, Ceresi E, Faloia E, Wang S, Fortier M, Greenberg AS, Obin MS. Adipocyte death defines macrophage localization and function in adipose tissue of obese mice and humans. J Lipid Res. 2005;46(11):2347–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Spalding KL, Arner E, Westermark PO, Bernard S, Buchholz BA, Bergmann O, Blomqvist L, Hoffstedt J, Näslund E, Britton T, Concha H, Hassan M, Rydén M, Frisén J, Arner P. Dynamics of fat cell turnover in humans. Nature. 2008;453(7196):783–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Marangoni RG, Korman BD, Wei J, Wood TA, Graham LV, Whitfield ML, Scherer PE, Tourtellotte WG, Varga J. Myofibroblasts in murine cutaneous fibrosis originate from adiponectin-positive intradermal progenitors. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015;67(4):1062–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Bi P, Yue F, Karki A, Castro B, Wirbisky SE, Wang C, Durkes A, Elzey BD, Andrisani OM, Bidwell CA, Freeman JL, Konieczny SF, Kuang S. Notch activation drives adipocyte dedifferentiation and tumorigenic transformation in mice. J Exp Med. 2016;213(10):2019–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Plikus MV, Guerrero-Juarez CF, Ito M, et al. Regeneration of fat cells from myofibroblasts during wound healing. Science. 2017;355(6326):748–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Boström P, Wu J, Jedrychowski MP, et al. A PGC1-α-dependent myokine that drives brown-fat-like development of white fat and thermogenesis. Nature. 2012;481(7382):463–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Liao Y, Zeng Z, Lu F, Dong Z, Chang Q, Gao J. In vivo dedifferentiation of adult adipose cells. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(4): e0125254.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Aitken KJ, Tolg C, Panchal T, et al. Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) induces proliferation and de-differentiation responses to three coordinate pathophysiologic stimuli (mechanical strain, hypoxia, and extracellular matrix remodeling) in rat bladder smooth muscle. Am J Pathol. 2010;176(1):304–19.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Lafont JE. Lack of oxygen in articular cartilage: consequences for chondrocyte biology. Int J Exp Pathol. 2010;91(2):99–106.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Wang QA, Song A, Chen W, Schwalie PC, Zhang F, Vishvanath L, Jiang L, Ye R, Shao M, Tao C, Gupta RK, Deplancke B, Scherer PE. Reversible de-differentiation of mature white adipocytes into preadipocyte-like precursors during lactation. Cell Metab. 2018;28(2):282-288.e3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Sugihara H, Yonemitsu N, Miyabara S, Yun K. Primary cultures of unilocular fat cells: characteristics of growth in vitro and changes in differentiation properties. Differentiation. 1986;31(1):42–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kaida K, Honda Y, Hashimoto Y, Tanaka M, Baba S. Application of green tea catechin for inducing the osteogenic differentiation of human dedifferentiated fat cells in vitro. Int J Mol Sci. 2015;16(12):27988–8000.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Okita N, Honda Y, Kishimoto N, Liao W, Azumi E, Hashimoto Y, Matsumoto N. Supplementation of strontium to a chondrogenic medium promotes chondrogenic differentiation of human dedifferentiated fat cells. Tissue Eng Part A. 2015;21(9–10):1695–704.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Sakamoto F, Hashimoto Y, Kishimoto N, Honda Y, Matsumoto N. The utility of human dedifferentiated fat cells in bone tissue engineering in vitro. Cytotechnology. 2015;67(1):75–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Fernyhough ME, Vierck JL, Hausman GJ, Mir PS, Okine EK, Dodson MV. Primary adipocyte culture: adipocyte purification methods may lead to a new understanding of adipose tissue growth and development. Cytotechnology. 2004;46(2–3):163–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Jumabay M, Abdmaulen R, Ly A, Cubberly MR, Shahmirian LJ, Heydarkhan-Hagvall S, Dumesic DA, Yao Y, Boström KI. Pluripotent stem cells derived from mouse and human white mature adipocytes. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2014;3(2):161–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Mohamed-Ahmed S, Fristad I, Lie SA, et al. Adipose-derived and bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells: a donor-matched comparison. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2018;9(1):168.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Saler M, Caliogna L, Botta L, Benazzo F, Riva F, Gastaldi G. hASC and DFAT, multipotent stem cells for regenerative medicine: a comparison of their potential differentiation in vitro. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18(12):2699.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Planat-Benard V, Silvestre JS, Cousin B, et al. Plasticity of human adipose lineage cells toward endothelial cells: physiological and therapeutic perspectives. Circulation. 2004;109(5):656–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Gao Q, Zhao L, Song Z, Yang G. Expression pattern of embryonic stem cell markers in DFAT cells and ADSCs. Mol Biol Rep. 2012;39(5):5791–804.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Zuk PA. The intracellular distribution of the ES cell totipotent markers OCT4 and Sox2 in adult stem cells differs dramatically according to commercial antibody used. J Cell Biochem. 2009;106(5):867–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Sun N, Panetta NJ, Gupta DM, et al. Feeder-free derivation of induced pluripotent stem cells from adult human adipose stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(37):15720–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Sachs PC, Francis MP, Zhao M, et al. Defining essential stem cell characteristics in adipose-derived stromal cells extracted from distinct anatomical sites. Cell Tissue Res. 2012;349(2):505–15.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Kou L, Lu XW, Wu MK, Wang H, Zhang YJ, Sato S, Shen JF. The phenotype and tissue-specific nature of multipotent cells derived from human mature adipocytes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2014;444(4):543–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Shigematsu M, Watanabe H, Sugihara H. Proliferation and differentiation of unilocular fat cells in the bone marrow. Cell Struct Funct. 1999;24(2):89–100.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Oki Y, Watanabe S, Endo T, Kano K. Mature adipocyte-derived dedifferentiated fat cells can trans-differentiate into osteoblasts in vitro and in vivo only by all-trans retinoic acid. Cell Struct Funct. 2008;33(2):211–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Kazama T, Fujie M, Endo T, Kano K. Mature adipocyte-derived dedifferentiated fat cells can transdifferentiate into skeletal myocytes in vitro. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2008;377(3):780–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Sakuma T, Matsumoto T, Kano K, et al. Mature, adipocyte derived, dedifferentiated fat cells can differentiate into smooth muscle-like cells and contribute to bladder tissue regeneration. J Urol. 2009;182(1):355–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Jumabay M, Matsumoto T, Yokoyama S, et al. Dedifferentiated fat cells convert to cardiomyocyte phenotype and repair infarcted cardiac tissue in rats. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2009;47(5):565–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Witkowska-Zimny M, Walenko K. Stem cells from adipose tissue. Cell Mol Biol Lett. 2011;16(2):236–57.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Tallone T, Realini C, Böhmler A, et al. Adult human adipose tissue contains several types of multipotent cells. J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2011;4(2):200–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Perrini S, Ficarella R, Picardi E, et al. Differences in gene expression and cytokine release profiles highlight the heterogeneity of distinct subsets of adipose tissue-derived stem cells in the subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue in humans. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(3): e57892.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Poloni A, Maurizi G, Leoni P, et al. Human dedifferentiated adipocytes show similar properties to bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells. 2012;30(5):965–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Watanabe H, Goto S, Kato R, et al. The neovascularization effect of dedifferentiated fat cells. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):9211.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Khare D, Basu B, Dubey AK. Electrical stimulation and piezoelectric biomaterials for bone tissue engineering applications. Biomaterials. 2020;258: 120280.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Kishimoto N, Momota Y, Hashimoto Y, et al. The osteoblastic differentiation ability of human dedifferentiated fat cells is higher than that of adipose stem cells from the buccal fat pad. Clin Oral Investig. 2014;18(8):1893–901.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Tsurumachi N, Akita D, Kano K, et al. Small buccal fat pad cells have high osteogenic differentiation potential. Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2016;22(3):250–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Tsurumachi N, Akita D, Kano K, et al. Effect of collagenase concentration on the isolation of small adipocytes from human buccal fat pad. J Oral Sci. 2018;60(1):14–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Fujisaki S, Kajiya H, Yanagi T, Maeshiba M, Kakura K, Kido H, Ohno J. Enhancement of jaw bone regeneration via ERK1/2 activation using dedifferentiated fat cells. Cytotherapy. 2021;23(7):608–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Kaida K, Honda Y, Hashimoto Y, Tanaka M, Baba S. Application of green tea catechin for inducing the osteogenic differentiation of human dedifferentiated fat cells in vitro. Int J Mol Sci. 2015;16(12):27988–8000.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Nakano K, Kubo H, Nakajima M, Honda Y, Hashimoto Y. Bone regeneration using rat-derived dedifferentiated fat cells combined with activated platelet-rich plasma. Materials (Basel). 2020;13(22):5097.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Shirakata Y, Nakamura T, Shinohara Y, et al. An exploratory study on the efficacy of rat dedifferentiated fat cells (rDFATs) with a poly lactic-co-glycolic acid/hydroxylapatite (PLGA/HA) composite for bone formation in a rat calvarial defect model. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2014;25(3):899–908.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Kikuta S, Tanaka N, Kazama T, et al. Osteogenic effects of dedifferentiated fat cell transplantation in rabbit models of bone defect and ovariectomy-induced osteoporosis. Tissue Eng Part A. 2013;19(15–16):1792–802.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Yanagi T, Kajiya H, Fujisaki S, et al. Three-dimensional spheroids of dedifferentiated fat cells enhance bone regeneration. Regen Ther. 2021;18:472–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Yang J, Zhang YS, Yue K, Khademhosseini A. Cell-laden hydrogels for osteochondral and cartilage tissue engineering. Acta Biomater. 2017;57:1–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Okita N, Honda Y, Kishimoto N, et al. Supplementation of strontium to a chondrogenic medium promotes chondrogenic differentiation of human dedifferentiated fat cells. Tissue Eng Part A. 2015;21(9–10):1695–704.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Nakayama E, Matsumoto T, Kazama T, Kano K, Tokuhashi Y. Transplantation of dedifferentiation fat cells promotes intervertebral disc regeneration in a rat intervertebral disc degeneration model. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2017;493(2):1004–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Soppert J, Lehrke M, Marx N, Jankowski J, Noels H. Lipoproteins and lipids in cardiovascular disease: from mechanistic insights to therapeutic targeting. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2020;159:4–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Vaughan CP, Markland AD. Urinary incontinence in women. Ann Intern Med. 2020;172(3):ITC17-ITC32.

  67. Cannon TW, Wojcik EM, Ferguson CL, Saraga S, Thomas C, Damaser MS. Effects of vaginal distension on urethral anatomy and function. BJU Int. 2002;90(4):403–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Obinata D, Matsumoto T, Ikado Y, et al. Transplantation of mature adipocyte-derived dedifferentiated fat (DFAT) cells improves urethral sphincter contractility in a rat model. Int J Urol. 2011;18(12):827–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Ikado Y, Obinata D, Matsumoto T, et al. Transplantation of mature adipocyte-derived dedifferentiated fat cells for the treatment of vesicoureteral reflux in a rat model. Int Urol Nephrol. 2016;48(12):1951–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Soejima K, Kashimura T, Asami T, Kazama T, Matsumoto T, Nakazawa H. Effects of mature adipocyte-derived dedifferentiated fat (DFAT) cells on generation and vascularisation of dermis-like tissue after artificial dermis grafting. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2015;49(1):25–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Asami T, Soejima K, Kashimura T, Kazama T, Matsumoto T, Morioka K, Nakazawa H. Effects of combination therapy using basic fibroblast growth factor and mature adipocyte-derived dedifferentiated fat (DFAT) cells on skin graft revascularisation. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2015;49(4):229–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Kashimura T, Soejima K, Asami T, Kazama T, Matsumoto T, Nakazawa H. The effect of mature adipocyte-derived dedifferentiated fat (DFAT) cells on a dorsal skin flap model. J Invest Surg. 2016;29(1):6–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Bagheri-Mohammadi S. Protective effects of mesenchymal stem cells on ischemic brain injury: therapeutic perspectives of regenerative medicine. Cell Tissue Bank. 2021;22(2):249–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Figiel-Dabrowska A, Radoszkiewicz K, Rybkowska P, Krzesniak NE, Sulejczak D, Sarnowska A. Neurogenic and neuroprotective potential of stem/stromal cells derived from adipose tissue. Cells. 2021;10(6):1475.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. Mikrogeorgiou A, Sato Y, Kondo T, et al. Dedifferentiated fat cells as a novel source for cell therapy to target neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. Dev Neurosci. 2017;39(1–4):273–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Kakudo T, Kishimoto N, Matsuyama T, Momota Y. Functional recovery by application of human dedifferentiated fat cells on cerebral infarction mice model. Cytotechnology. 2018;70(3):949–59.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  77. Yamada H, Ito D, Oki Y, Kitagawa M, Matsumoto T, Watari T, Kano K. Transplantation of mature adipocyte-derived dedifferentiated fat cells promotes locomotor functional recovery by remyelination and glial scar reduction after spinal cord injury in mice. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2014;454(2):341–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Matsumine H, Takeuchi Y, Sasaki R, et al. Adipocyte-derived and dedifferentiated fat cells promoting facial nerve regeneration in a rat model. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;134(4):686–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Rinker B, Zoldos J, Weber RV, et al. Use of processed nerve allografts to repair nerve injuries greater than 25 mm in the hand. Ann Plast Surg. 2017;78(6S Suppl 5):S292-S295.

  80. Fujimaki H, Matsumine H, Osaki H, et al. Corrigendum to "Dedifferentiated fat cells in polyglycolic acid-collagen nerve conduits promote rat facial nerve regeneration" [Regen Ther 11 (2019) 240–248]. Regen Ther. 2020;15:35–43. Published 2020 Jun 10.

  81. Scheinecker C, Göschl L, Bonelli M. Treg cells in health and autoimmune diseases: New insights from single cell analysis. J Autoimmun. 2020;110: 102376.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Ishioka S, Hosokawa T, Ikeda T, et al. Therapeutic potential of mature adipocyte-derived dedifferentiated fat cells for inflammatory bowel disease. Pediatr Surg Int. 2020;36(7):799–807.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  83. Yu F, Haas M, Glassock R, Zhao MH. Redefining lupus nephritis: clinical implications of pathophysiologic subtypes. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2017;13(8):483–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Maruyama T, Fukuda N, Matsumoto T, et al. Systematic implantation of dedifferentiated fat cells ameliorated monoclonal antibody 1–22–3-induced glomerulonephritis by immunosuppression with increases in TNF-stimulated gene 6. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2015;6(1):80. Published 2015 Apr 16.

  85. Nur R, Fukuda N, Matsumoto T, et al. Implantation of dedifferentiated fat cells ameliorates habu snake venom-induced chronic renal dysfunction in tenascin-C-deficient mice. Nephron Exp Nephrol. 2008;110(3):e91–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Cortellini P, Tonetti MS. Clinical concepts for regenerative therapy in intrabony defects. Periodontol. 2015;68(1):282–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Sugawara A, Sato S. Application of dedifferentiated fat cells for periodontal tissue regeneration. Hum Cell. 2014;27(1):12–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Akita D, Kano K, Saito-Tamura Y, et al. Use of rat mature adipocyte-derived dedifferentiated fat cells as a cell source for periodontal tissue regeneration. Front Physiol. 2016;7:50.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Nature Science Foundation of China (81971852, 81901976) and the Administrator Foundation of Nanfang Hospital (2018Z010).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, China

    Zhuokai Liang, Yufei He, Haojing Tang, Jian Li, Junrong Cai & Yunjun Liao

Authors
  1. Zhuokai Liang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yufei He
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Haojing Tang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jian Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Junrong Cai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yunjun Liao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors contributed to the conception and the main idea of the work. ZL, YH, HT and JL drafted the main text, figures, and tables. YL and JC supervised the work and provided the comments and additional scientific information. ZL also reviewed and revised the text. All authors read and approved the final version of the work to be published.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Junrong Cai or Yunjun Liao.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liang, Z., He, Y., Tang, H. et al. Dedifferentiated fat cells: current applications and future directions in regenerative medicine. Stem Cell Res Ther 14, 207 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-023-03399-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-023-03399-0

Keywords

Stem Cell Research & Therapy

ISSN: 1757-6512