Skip to main content
Download PDF

Low levels of circulating methylated IRX3 are related to worse outcome after transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with severe aortic stenosis

Clinical Epigenetics volume 15, Article number: 149 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Aortic stenosis (AS) is one of the most common cardiac diseases and major cause of morbidity and mortality in the elderly. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is performed in such patients with symptomatic severe AS and reduces mortality for the majority of these patients. However, a significant percentage dies within the first two years after TAVI, such that there is an interest to identify parameters, which predict outcome and could guide pre-TAVI patient selection. High levels of cardiac fibrosis have been identified as such independent predictor of cardiovascular mortality after TAVI. Promoter hypermethylation commonly leads to gene downregulation, and the Iroquois homeobox 3 (IRX3) gene was identified in a genome-wide transcriptome and methylome to be hypermethylated and downregulated in AS patients. In a well-described cohort of 100 TAVI patients in which cardiac fibrosis levels were quantified histologically in cardiac biopsies, and which had a follow-up of up to two years, we investigated if circulating methylated DNA of IRX3 in the peripheral blood is associated with cardiac fibrosis and/or mortality in AS patients undergoing TAVI and thus could serve as a biomarker to add information on outcome after TAVI.

Results

Patients with high levels of methylation in circulating IRX3 show a significantly increased survival as compared to patients with low levels of IRX3 methylation indicating that high peripheral IRX3 methylation is associated with an improved outcome. In the multivariable setting, peripheral IRX3 methylation acts as an independent predictor of all-cause mortality. While there is no significant correlation of levels of IRX3 methylation with cardiac death, there is a significant but very weak inverse correlation between circulating IRX3 promoter methylation level and the amount of cardiac fibrosis. Higher levels of peripheral IRX3 methylation further correlated with decreased cardiac IRX3 expression and vice versa.

Conclusions

High levels of IRX3 methylation in the blood of AS patients at the time of TAVI are associated with better overall survival after TAVI and at least partially reflect myocardial IRX3 expression. Circulating methylated IRX3 might aid as a potential biomarker to help guide both pre-TAVI patient selection and post-TAVI monitoring.

Graphical abstract

Background

Aortic stenosis (AS) is a common cardiac disease in the elderly with a prevalence as high as 9.8% in the population older than 80 years [1]. In the advanced stage of AS, the narrowed valve leads to pressure overload of the left ventricular system and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) thus finally to heart failure [2]. Current guidelines recommend transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) as the intervention mode for symptomatic AS patients with increased age and high surgical risk, whereas evidence for intervention to improve outcomes in asymptomatic severe AS is less strong [3]. Thus, the appropriate timing of intervention and risk stratification of AS patients is highly important.

Biomarkers are essential and well established in the diagnosis of cardiovascular diseases, such as heart failure or myocardial infarction (MI) [4, 5]. However, although conventional biomarkers, such as B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels, show associations with mortality in AS patients, they are not fully established and play a minor role in diagnostic guidelines [2, 6]. At the same time, insight into the impact of different epigenetic mechanisms on the pathogenesis of AS is increasing and their potential utility as biomarkers has recently been described [7]. Also, current research showed the impact of cardiac fibrosis (CF) on increased mortality after TAVI, so non-invasive assessment of CF by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) can be considered as a future biomarker for risk stratification in AS patients [8, 9]. However, these approaches are not implemented into clinical routine diagnostics of AS and independent and specific biomarkers to inform on individual risk of AS patients are still needed.

Epigenetics contribute to the development and pathogenesis of numerous diseases [10]. In this respect, the process of DNA methylation leads to silencing of gene expression and is catalyzed by DNA methyltransferases, but can be reactivated via hydroxymethylation catalyzed by TET (ten eleven translocation) enzymes [11,12,13]. This offers the opportunity for a possible therapeutic approach by methylating and demethylating drugs, which have already been investigated in preclinical studies and even some clinical trials for cardiovascular diseases [14]. While the role of DNA methylation has not yet been thoroughly investigated in the pathogenesis of AS, first results showed altered methylation of distinguished genes in both congenital and acquired AS [15, 16].

Epigenetic alterations in circulating DNA were first reported to reflect tumor DNA and might aid as a biomarker to inform on tumor progression [17]. The release of DNA into the peripheral blood occurs by necrosis, apoptosis and active secretion [18, 19]. It could also be observed under inflammatory conditions, raising the possibility to ensue in the inflammatory process in the pathogenesis of AS as well [20]. For other cardiovascular diseases, including heart failure, elevated levels of specific circulating DNA have been described and discussed as potential biomarkers [21, 22]. Moreover, in the search for new epigenetic biomarkers of cardiovascular diseases, high hopes are pinned on the application of powerful research approaches such as network medicine and artificial intelligence, linking molecular findings to clinical parameters and imaging tools [23, 24].

A genome-wide transcriptome and methylome comparison (MeDIP-seq) between cardiac tissue of AS patients and healthy controls by our group identified the Iroquois homeobox 3 (IRX3) protein to be simultaneously downregulated in gene expression and hypermethylated in the promoter region. IRX3 is known to influence embryonic neural development in the ventral neural tube and motor neurons [25, 26]. Recent findings revealed its role in the metabolic system, where deficiency of IRX3 was protective in a mouse model of obesity [27]. The role of IRX3 in the cardiovascular field has not yet been fully identified. It could be shown that a knockout of IRX3 leads to malformations during embryonic and postnatal development, especially in the outflow area and the ventricular conduction system [28, 29]. Even in the adult heart, mutations of IRX3 are associated with idiopathic ventricular fibrillation, which presents a high risk of sudden cardiac death [30].

Here, we aimed to assess if circulating methylated IRX3 is associated with cardiac fibrosis and/or survival in AS patients after TAVI. We first assessed the promoter activity of the differentially methylated region (DMR) identified from the MeDIP-seq analysis by a promoter activity assay and confirmed that there is reduced gene activity due to hypermethylation. In a random subset of 10 out of the 88 patients who received a cardiac biopsy, we next analyzed IRX3 expression in cardiac biopsies in addition to circulating methylated DNA fragments. This analysis demonstrated that patients with low circulating IRX3 promoter methylation had a higher IRX3 expression in the heart, suggesting that circulating IRX3 promoter methylation at least to some extent represents IRX3 expression in the heart. Finally, we examined the circulating IRX3 promoter methylation and its association to cardiac fibrosis and to mortality in 100 AS patients who underwent TAVI and were followed up for two years after TAVI. We found that a lower promoter methylation of IRX3 was associated with a significantly higher all-cause but not cardiovascular mortality within two years after TAVI in both univariable and multivariable analyses, suggesting circulating methylated IRX3 DNA as a novel prognostic biomarker in patients with AS.

Results

Promoter hypermethylation causes downregulation of gene expression in vitro

In order to assess if promoter methylation of IRX3 leads to its downregulation, we performed a promoter activity assay. The DNA sequence of the DMR of IRX3 as identified from the MeDIP-seq analysis (from − 1330 bp to 34 bp) was inserted into the pCpGL-basic vector containing a firefly luciferase encoding region. The construct was then subjected to an in vitro methylation assay, and the methylated construct was delivered into HEK-293 cells by transfection. The luciferase activity of the methylated pCpGL-IRX3 was significantly reduced as compared to the unmethylated control (Fig. 1). This result suggests that the DMR, which was identified from the MeDIP-seq assay, has a strong promoter activity for IRX3 gene. Therefore, the MeDIP-qPCR (methylated DNA immunoprecipitation-real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction) assay was established within this region.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Promoter hypermethylation of IRX3 causes reduction of gene expression in vitro. GC content summary of IRX3 promoter region with the locations for the pCpGL cloning primers and MeDIP primers. Plasmid map of pCpGL-IRX3 (5216 bp) with IRX3 promoter sequence (1364 bp) inserted before the firefly luciferase section. Quantification of normalized luciferase activity showed a 143.4-fold reduction for the methylated construct as compared to the unmethylated control. Red color indicates a high amount of GC content, whereas blue color represents low GC content. One-way ANOVA was used for multiple group comparison. Relative luciferase activity and associated error bars represent mean ± SEM, n ≥ 3, **** p < 0.0001. Plasmid map was created using the SnapGene software (version 4.2.4), Insightful Science, San Diego, CA, USA. TSS: transcription start site

Full size image

IRX3 expression and connection to the promoter methylation in human cardiac biopsies

This study includes 100 study participants who underwent TAVI in the Department of Cardiology and Pneumology at the University Medical Center Göttingen (UMG). Blood samples were available from all patients at the time of TAVI. Biopsies, in which cardiac fibrosis was quantified, were taken during the TAVI procedure and were available from 88 of these patients. To investigate the connection between circulating IRX3 promoter methylation and cardiac IRX3 expression, we isolated the DNA from the buffy coat of the blood samples and performed a MeDIP-qPCR assay. This allowed us to divide the study cohort into a group of high (IRX35mc−high) and low (IRX35mc−low) promoter methylation. We used a random subset of five samples of each group for IRX3 expression analysis by immunohistochemistry staining with IRX3 antibody.

The group of low IRX3 promoter methylation exposed a higher mean IRX3 positive area in the cardiac biopsies (IRX35mc−low, 18.0% ± 2.7%; IRX35mc−high, 10.4% ± 1.4%, Fig. 2 A). Additionally, the IRX3 positive area and the IRX3 promoter methylation showed a significant inverse correlation (p = 0.038, Fig. 2 B). However, the IRX3 positive area and the amount of cardiac fibrosis did not show a significant correlation (Fig. 2C). This result implies a possible correlation between cardiac IRX3 expression and circulating IRX3 promoter methylation.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Immunohistochemical staining of IRX3 and its correlation to the circulating promoter methylation level. A Quantification of IRX3 positive area. Compared to the group of circulating IRX3 promoter methylation above the median (gray), the group of circulating IRX3 promoter methylation below the median (black) showed a higher amount of IRX3 positive stained area. B Correlation analysis between circulating IRX3 promoter methylation and the amount of IRX3 positive stained area revealed a significant inverse correlation (r = − 0.66) C Correlation analysis between cardiac fibrosis and the amount of IRX3 positive stained area showed no significance for the correlative tendency. D Immunohistochemical staining of IRX3 (red color) in a cardiac biopsy of a patient from the low circulating IRX3 promoter methylation group showing a high amount of IRX3. E Immunohistochemical staining of IRX3 (red color) in a cardiac biopsy of a patient from the high circulating IRX3 promoter methylation group showing a low amount of IRX3. Student’s t-test was used for single comparison. IRX3 positive area and associated error bars represent mean ± SEM, n = 5

Full size image

In vivo data of one hundred patients with severe AS

Baseline characteristics

The total cohort which was named above contained 41 women and 59 men with a mean age of 78.4 ± 0.6 years, indicating for advanced age. The number of co-morbidities such as coronary heart disease (70%), diabetes mellitus (39%) and atrial fibrillation (41%) was relatively high in this cohort, as well as the average NYHA-class (New York Heart Association) of 2.78 ± 0.08 (Table 1).

Table 1 Baseline characteristics depending on all-cause mortality
Full size table

After identifying the participants who died in the observation period (all-cause mortality), we observed that the 6-min walking test (6MWT) distance was significantly lower in the group of deaths and the mean NYHA-class was significantly higher in this group. LAVI was significantly increased in the group of deaths. The LVEF tended to be reduced in the group of deaths but didn’t reach a level of significance (death, 47.5% ± 3.6%; no death, 53.4% ± 1.7; p = 0.098) (Table 1). Additionally, peripheral artery disease and atrial fibrillation as co-morbidities were more common in the group of deaths. Interestingly, the promoter methylation of IRX3 in the peripheral blood, which was assessed using MeDIP-qPCR assay, was significantly lower in the group of deaths than in the group of survivors (death, 1.27% ± 0.20%; no death, 1.90% ± 0.18%).

Additional analysis of baseline parameters for cardiac deaths revealed differences regarding several cardiac parameters: The amount of cardiac fibrosis was significantly increased in the cardiac deaths (cardiac death, 33.4% ± 6.3%; no cardiac death, 14.8% ± 2.1%). Additionally, the LVEF was significantly reduced in the group of cardiac deaths (Table 2). The peak aortic jet velocity and the mean pressure gradient between the left ventricle and the ascending aorta were significantly lower and the aortic valve area tended to be smaller in the group of cardiac deaths than in the group of no cardiac deaths, representing a high amount of low-gradient AS in the cardiac deaths (Table 2). Interestingly, a very high number of participants in the group of cardiac deaths suffered from diabetes mellitus (cardiac death, 86%; no cardiac death, 31%). In contrast to the comparison depending on all-cause mortality, the promoter methylation of IRX3 showed no significant difference between cardiac deaths and no cardiac deaths (Table 2).

Table 2 Baseline characteristics depending on cardiac mortality
Full size table

Comparison of baseline characteristics depending on the amount of IRX3 promoter methylation

The division of the study cohort by the IRX3 promoter methylation led to a group of participants with a promoter methylation above (IRX35mc−high) and the other group below (IRX35mc−low) the median (median = 1.39%). No statistical difference between both groups could be detected for the basic characteristic parameters, such as age, body mass index (BMI) or sex, and all other baseline parameters showed no significant difference (Table 3).

Table 3 Baseline characteristics depending on IRX3 methylation level
Full size table

Correlation analysis between IRX3 promoter methylation and distinguished clinical parameters

As basic parameters, age and BMI were included into the correlation analysis. In addition, cardiac fibrosis due to its newly identified role in AS was also included [8]. Interestingly, a significant but very weak inverse correlation between the promoter methylation of IRX3 and the amount of cardiac fibrosis was detected (Table 4, Fig. 3).

Table 4 Correlations between circulating IRX3 promoter methylation level and distinguished clinical parameters
Full size table
Fig. 3
figure 3

Significant inverse correlation between circulating IRX3 promoter methylation level and cardiac fibrosis. The circulating IRX3 promoter methylation and the amount of cardiac fibrosis correlate inversely on a significant level but with a relatively weak correlation coefficient (r = 0.215). Each dot representing one individual (n = 100), regression shown as simple linear regression. Pearson’s correlation coefficient (Pearson’s r) and p value were calculated

Full size image

Survival analysis

To assess the correlation between IRX3 promoter methylation levels and patient mortality, two different analyses were performed: 1. univariable survival analyses on previously defined two groups (IRX35mc−high, IRX35mc−low) and 2. multivariable survival analyses. Both groups were compared based on all-cause (Fig. 4A) and cardiac mortality (Fig. 4B). All-cause mortality was clearly predicted by a low IRX3 promoter methylation (p = 0.0098). For cardiac mortality, no significant difference could be detected.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Survival analysis depending on circulating IRX3 promoter methylation level. Kaplan–Meier curves showing all-cause (A) and cardiac (B) mortality for the first 600 days after TAVI in patients with circulating IRX3 promoter methylation below (green) and above (red) the median. A Patients with promoter methylation above the median show a better survival and outcome after TAVI as compared to those with promoter methylation below the median for all-cause mortality. B Both groups of promoter methylation above and promoter methylation below the median show no significant difference for cardiac mortality after TAVI

Full size image

For the multivariable survival analyses, multivariable Cox-regression was performed. As a first block of the model, age and sex were taken as basic demographic parameters and IRX3 promoter methylation was added as the variable of interest. In the next block, eleven relevant clinical parameters deemed to be related to outcomes (Cardiac fibrosis, LVEF, Vmax, MPG, AVA, Plasma creatinine, NYHA-class, AF, CAD, DM, CRD) were automatically added stepwise using forward covariate selection based on likelihood ratio, until the most suitable model was reached. To compare the different models, − 2 log likelihood was used as a metric for evaluation. The final model (− 2 log likelihood = 140.81, Chi-square = 23.98, p < 0.001***) included AF and DM as statistically significant parameters for the prediction of all-cause mortality and in line with the results from Kaplan–Meier analysis and even though many clinical parameters were included for the analysis, IRX3 promoter methylation was an independent predictor for all-cause mortality as well (Fig. 5A, HR = 0.59, CI = 0.40–0.86, p = 0.006).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Multivariable Cox-regression model for all-cause and cardiac mortality after TAVI. The final multivariable Cox-regression models for all-cause (A) and cardiac (B) mortality. A The final model included AF and DM as independent predictors of all-cause mortality, whereas an increase in IRX3 promoter methylation level was protective. B The final model included AF and DM as independent predictors of cardiac mortality, whereas LVEF was protective. IRX3 promoter methylation level showed no influence on cardiac mortality. CI: confidence interval; HR: hazard ratio; LVEF: left ventricular ejection fraction. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01

Full size image

The model for cardiac mortality was designed and assessed in the same way as for all-cause mortality. The final model for cardiac mortality (− 2 log likelihood = 70.63, Chi-square = 34.16, p < 0.001***) included LVEF, AF and DM as statistically significant parameters for the prediction of cardiac mortality. IRX3 promoter methylation showed no significant influence on cardiac mortality (Fig. 5B, HR = 0.67, CI = 0.37–1.20, p = 0.177). This contrasts the findings from the Cox-regression model on all-cause mortality but is in line with the results from Kaplan–Meier analysis for cardiac mortality.

Discussion

The present study was designed to examine the potential connection between the circulating IRX3 promoter methylation and survival after TAVI. The key findings are: (1) Circulating IRX3 promoter methylation below the median independently predicts all-cause mortality in both univariable and multivariable analyses but not cardiac mortality after TAVI. (2) Patients that died from all-cause death had significantly lower IRX3 promoter methylation, but those that died from cardiovascular causes had no difference in IRX3 promoter methylation. (3) The expression of IRX3 was higher in myocardial biopsies from patients with low levels of circulating IRX3 promoter methylation, whereas there was no correlation between IRX3 positive area in the heart and cardiac fibrosis. (4) Promoter hypermethylation decreases IRX3 gene expression in vitro. (5) There is a significant but very weak inverse correlation between circulating IRX3 promoter methylation and cardiac fibrosis.

This study demonstrates a strong influence of promoter hypermethylation as an epigenetic regulatory mechanism on gene expression of IRX3. Many studies showed a link between promoter hypermethylation and reduction of gene expression, which match our findings [31, 32]. Evidence for the reflection of gene expression by circulating methylated DNA is rarely available, due to its release from different organs by distinctive mechanisms [18, 19]. We are aware that the origin of the circulating methylated DNA in our clinical samples is unspecified. However, cardiomyocyte specific circulating DNA has recently been identified and has shown to be elevated in patients with myocardial damage [33]. Differently methylated regions of DNA were also reported in aortic and mitral valve tissue, and the linked genes are associated with (patho-) physiological pathways [34]. Results from our immunohistochemical staining experiment suggested an inverse correlation between circulating IRX3 promoter methylation and gene expression in myocardial biopsies. Therefore, the connection between circulating IRX3 promoter methylation and IRX3 expression in the heart can be assumed. However, further studies on the release and origin of circulating DNA, especially in cardiac diseases, are needed to further investigate and prove this correlation.

Further, many independent studies described the harmful impact of cardiac fibrosis in patients with AS, where increased cardiac fibrosis is associated with a worse clinical outcome [8, 35,36,37,38]. Our data are in line with this observation, as the amount of cardiac fibrosis was significantly increased in the group of cardiac deaths. Additionally, correlation analysis between cardiac fibrosis and circulating IRX3 promoter methylation showed a weak but significant inverse correlation, as high levels of cardiac fibrosis were associated with less IRX3 promoter methylation. As this is related to a higher genetic expression, a pro-fibrotic influence of high IRX3 expression levels might be possible but had not been discussed in the literature before. In contrast, however, there was no correlation between IRX3 positive area in the biopsies and cardiac fibrosis, so the validity of these observations remains limited. Again, further research on the function of IRX3 in the mammalian heart is needed to uncover a possible connection.

In the present study, univariable and multivariable survival analyses revealed an association between circulating IRX3 promoter methylation and all-cause mortality. Surprisingly, for cardiac mortality, no effect of IRX3 promoter methylation on survival was shown in either univariable or multivariable analysis. A possible explanation for the missing influence on cardiac mortality is the low number of cardiac deaths (n = 14) in comparison with all-cause deaths (n = 25). Additionally, the number of co-morbidities in the study cohort was very high. As IRX3 promoter methylation was only connected to all-cause and not to cardiac mortality, it may be related to factors other than cardiac damage. Since the co-morbidities were not significantly different between the groups of high and low circulating IRX3 promoter methylation, our results suggest that levels of circulating methylation IRX3 promoter fragments can add prognostic value beyond simply indicating co-morbidities. Also in the multivariable Cox-regression model for all-cause mortality, IRX3 promoter methylation remained statistically significant along with diabetes and atrial fibrillation, whereas the other clinical parameters did not.

Additionally, there was no effect of CAD on both cardiac and all-cause mortality, although the influence has already been shown previously [39]. The prevalence of CAD in our cohort was very high (70%), so due to methodical reasons it is likely that it does not show an influence on survival as an important factor. Since we do not have additional information on complexity and severity of CAD, no further statements can be made about the influence of CAD in our cohort.

As nowadays clinical guidelines recommend intervention for every patient with symptomatic severe AS but not for asymptomatic patients, intervention in those patients is performed only in exceptional cases or clinical trials [3]. A recent study showed that early surgical valve replacement in asymptomatic patients compared to standard conservative treatment improved the outcome during follow-up [40]. However, this study had several limitations such as small size of the study cohort and relatively young age (mean = 64 years), so no new principles for treatment were derived from it. The latest guidelines for AS management recommend intervention in asymptomatic patients if the procedural risk is low and BNP levels are elevated more than three times normal range, but usually procedural risk in TAVI patients is elevated due to their amount of co-morbidities, so this might not be applicable to our cohort [3]. Risk scores, as the EuroSCORE II, which was designed for general cardiac surgery, were tested in TAVI cohorts and especially the EuroSCORE II predicted 30-day mortality after TAVI, but only symptomatic patients were included in this study and the authors criticized the lack of gaining additional information by using this score [41]. Further biomarkers which are well established for other cardiac diseases, as MI or heart failure, were examined in patients with severe AS undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). Elevated levels of NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro b-type natriuretic peptide) combined with hsTropT (high-sensitivity troponin T) as well as CRP (C-reactive protein) were associated with a worse outcome after SAVR [42]. Multiple studies investigated novel potential biomarkers, i.e., malondialdehyde, Galectin-3 or specific circulating micro-RNAs, with promising results, but mostly in small cohorts without randomization [43,44,45]. Epigenetic alterations which could potentially be used as biomarkers were also described for other cardiovascular diseases, e.g., methylated DNA of CD4 + cells in pulmonary arterial hypertension or DNA methylation profile of human leukocyte antigen-G in CAD [46, 47]. Our findings add a novel candidate into this emerging and fast-developing field, as low circulating IRX3 promoter methylation predicted a worse outcome after TAVI, and thus might aid as a biomarker for identify AS patients at higher risk and to monitor these patients more closely, even though the increased risk of mortality may not be due to cardiac factors. Therefore, our biomarker should be also studied in other cohorts suffering from diseases outside of the cardiovascular field, to further evaluate its association with mortality.

To target the pathophysiology of AS and slow down or even stop its development by specific drugs is the most desirable method to end the enormous burden caused by this disease. Although many attempts have been made in this regard, no specific pharmaceutical therapy is available today [48]. Previous studies revealed a harmful impact of DNA methylation on disease progression due to the suppression of fibrosis suppressor or tumor suppressor genes [49,50,51]. Since the methylation of DNA is a reversible process, it is a highly promising approach to target therapeutically [52]. Therefore, previous research has focused on the use of demethylating agents as therapeutic approaches, such as 5-azacytidine in cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis, or hydralazine in chronic kidney disease [50, 51]. In contrast, in our study, methylation of IRX3 appears to have a beneficial effect on survival. In case future studies demonstrate a functionally beneficial role of methylated IRX3, this would raise the possibility of a specifically methylating epidrug. Certainly, it is still too early to conclude from these results on clinical application. In order to identify if IRX3 could serve as a therapeutic target or diagnostic marker for future clinical purpose, further studies on its molecular function both inside and outside of the heart are needed.

Conclusions

This study found that low levels of IRX3 methylation in the blood of AS patients at the time of TAVI are associated with poorer survival after TAVI and at least partially reflect higher myocardial IRX3 expression. Therefore, circulating methylated IRX3 might aid as a potential biomarker to help guide both pre-TAVI patient selection and post-TAVI monitoring.

Limitations

Firstly, our study is not a randomized study. The decision to perform TAVI instead of SAVR in patients with AS is biased by age, co-morbidities and the patient’s request. This selection bias resulted in a study cohort of elderly patients with a high number of co-morbidities, thus influencing all-cause and cardiac mortality. Secondly, it was a single-center study with only one hundred participants. Due to the limited size, the validity of the findings for the population is limited. Preferably, to increase the power and validity of the findings, another study with a higher number of participants is needed. In addition, not all patients completed 2-years follow-up, which could lead to the false assumption that subjects are still alive even though they have already died. In order not to allow this false assumption, the date of last visit was assessed for these subjects and Kaplan–Meier analysis and Cox-regression take these censored subjects into account methodically. Lastly, a relatively small number of samples was used for IHC staining of IRX3, and conclusion from this small number may be limited.

Methods

Study cohort

Between January 2017 and May 2019, 100 patients underwent transfemoral TAVI and were enrolled to the study. The university’s ethics committee approved the study and informed consent was obtained from each patient. All procedures were performed conform to the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. All patients had severe AS. Several patients also had other valvular heart disease but those were not severe. All patients were symptomatic and all had dyspnea. Rates of angina, however, were not assessed. At baseline, transthoracic (TTE) and transesophageal (TEE) echocardiography were performed, and 6-min walking test (6MWT), STS score, EuroSCORE II and New York Heart Association (NYHA) status were assessed, and plasma creatinine levels were measured. Follow-up visits were scheduled after six months, one year and two years. The primary endpoint was defined by cardiovascular mortality according to the VARC-2 definition [53] and the secondary endpoint by all-cause mortality.

Human myocardial tissue

During TAVI, cardiac biopsies were harvested from the basal anteroseptum of the left ventricle in 88 out of the 100 patients of our cohort. The samples were placed in 10% paraformaldehyde and embedded in paraffin. The amount of cardiac fibrosis was assessed using the software CellSens (Olympus, Shinjuku, Japan), where fibrotic area was defined as blue area in Masson’s trichrome staining (MTS).

DNA extraction and MeDIP

Evidence can be found for rapid clearance of circulating cell-free DNA from the blood and it has been further described that almost all extracellular nucleic acids in individuals without malignancies are bound at the surface of blood cells including leukocytes [54,55,56]. Additionally, distinguished DNA methylation sites in patients with heart failure which are conserved between cardiac tissue and whole-peripheral blood have recently been identified [57]. Therefore, we decided to investigate the peripheral methylation in the cellular compartment of whole blood containing leukocytes (buffy coat) instead of plasma. Human circulating DNA was isolated from the buffy coat layer of anticoagulated EDTA (ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid) blood samples using the DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Venlo, the Netherlands) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. For maximum DNA yield, 100 µL buffy coat were taken. In the next stage, Methylated DNA immunoprecipitation (MeDIP) was performed using the Methylamp Methylated DNA Capture Kit (Epigentek, Farmingdale, NY, USA). In the first step, 1.2 µg of isolated DNA was sheared by sonication and then denatured to obtain single-stranded DNA. One microgram of the provided DNA was then placed inside each antibody coated well and further treated as described in the manufacturer’s protocol. An input vial was performed for each sample to act as a loading control.

Real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR)

To assess the methylated DNA amplification, 2 µL of immunoprecipitated DNA, 10 µL of Fast SYBR Green Master Mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and 2 µL of primer mix (sequences listed below) were used in a final volume of 20 µL. The reaction was performed in a MicroAmp Fast 96-Well Reaction Plate (Thermo Fisher Scientific) using the StepOnePlus Real-Time PCR System (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The methylation level was quantified in comparison with the input sample using the ∆∆Ct method. Oligonucleotides sequences for MeDIP-qPCR are shown in Table 5.

Table 5 Primers
Full size table

Chromogenic immunohistochemical staining

Since many of the cardiac biopsies were also used for other studies, we selected ten biopsies out of the 88 biopsies randomly and solely based on abundant availability of biopsy tissue in the biobank. These patients did not share any specific characteristics. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded human myocardial samples were sectioned at 3 µm, deparaffinized by xylene and rehydrated by graded ethanol-series with decreasing concentrations. Heat-induced epitope retrieval was performed with citrate buffer (Target Retrieval Solution, Citrate pH 6.1 (10x), Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) for 40 min. The slides were then incubated in a 0.3% peroxidase blocking buffer (Carl Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany) for 30 min, and blocked afterward in diluted normal horse serum (Vectastain Elite ABC-HRP Kit, Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA) for 20 min, followed by overnight incubation at 4 °C with the primary antibody (Rabbit Anti-Human IRX3, 1:50, Biorbyt, Cambridge, UK, Cat-No. orb127001). Next, the slides were incubated with the biotinylated secondary anti-rabbit antibody (1:50, Vectastain Elite ABC-HRP Kit, Vector Laboratories) for 30 min. Afterward, the samples were incubated in the avidin–biotin conjugate (ABC-solution, Vectastain Elite ABC-HRP Kit, Vector Laboratories) for 30 min, followed by incubation with AEC Substrate-Chromogen (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) until the staining’s intensity was sufficiently. Nuclear staining was performed with acid hemalum solution according to Mayer (Carl Roth). Microscopic pictures were taken using the Olympus microscope BX43 and CellSens software. Six representative visual fields were selected randomly and the intensity of staining was assessed using the FIJI software [58]. The amount of IRX3 was defined as red colored area in relation to total image area.

Cloning and in vitro methylation

IRX3 promoter sequence was amplified using the Phusion High-Fidelity PCR kit (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol with the primer sequences listed in Table 5 and an amount of 100 ng genomic DNA. Afterward, electrophoresis was performed on a 1.2% agarose gel and DNA was extracted from the gel using the QIAquick Gel Extraction kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Further, the pCpGL-basic vector and IRX3-promoter insert were digested with HindIII/PstI restriction enzymes. Vector and insert were ligated using T4 DNA ligase (Promega, Fitchburg, MA, USA). To amplify the construct, transformation was performed using the One Shot PIR1 Chemically Competent E. coli (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The ligated DNA was inserted using the heat shock method and selected by the usage of the antibiotic zeocin (25 µg/mL). Miniprep was performed using the Zyppy Plasmid Miniprep kit (Zymo Research, Freiburg, Germany) as described in the manufacturer’s protocol. Transformation efficacy was confirmed by gel electrophoresis and sequencing. For enhanced plasmid yield, Midiprep was performed using the HiSpeed Plasmid Midi kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The pCpGL-IRX3 plasmid was then methylated in vitro using the CpG (cytosine-phosphate-guanine) Methylase (M. Sssl) kit (Zymo Research) according to the manufacturer’s protocol by using 3 µg of isolated plasmid DNA in a total reaction volume of 60 µL. The methylated DNA was isolated using the DNA Clean & Concentrator-5 kit (Zymo Research) as described in the manufacturer’s protocol.

Cell culture and luciferase assay

Human Embryonic Kidney cells (HEK-293, ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA) were maintained in DMEM (Dulbecco's modified eagle medium) low-glucose medium (Thermo Fisher Scientific) supplemented with 10% FBS (fetal bovine serum) (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and 1% penicillin–streptomycin (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). For transfection, 20,000 cells/well were seeded into each well of a 24-well plate. Transfection was performed using Lipofectamine 3000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. 1 µg of plasmid DNA, 1 µL of Lipofectamine 3000, and 2 µL of P3000 Enhancer Reagent were mixed with Opti-MEM I medium (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and added to the cells. Cells were harvested 48 h after transfection and used for luciferase assay by using the Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay System kit (Promega, Fitchburg, MA, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions, but only measuring the firefly luciferase activity. The lysate was transferred into a Lumix 96-multiwell plate (Sarstedt, Nümbrecht, Germany) and 50 µL of Luciferase Assay Reagent II were placed into each well. Luciferase activity was assessed by the Fluorescence Microplate Reader Synergy Mx (Biotek Instruments, Winooski, VT, USA). The reduction of luciferase activity was calculated compared to the unmethylated control and normalized to the empty pCpGL-basic vector.

Statistics

All data were presented as mean ± standard error mean (SEM). P-value less or equal to 0.05 was defined as statistically significant. In vitro experiments were carried out with three or more biological replicates for all experiments. Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 8 software (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA). Unpaired Student’s t-test was used for single comparison and one-way ANOVA for comparing multiple groups. Human data were analyzed using the SPSS Statistics program (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). A median split by IRX3 promoter methylation and by survival was performed to further characterize the study cohort. Continuous variables were compared using unpaired Student’s t-test. Categorical variables were presented as absolute numbers and percentage and compared by Pearson’s Chi2-test. For direct correlation analysis, Pearson’s correlation coefficient was determined. Survival was analyzed using Kaplan–Meier plot and logrank test for univariable analysis in the period up to 600 days after TAVI. Multivariable models were calculated using Cox-regression model. As a first block of the model, age and sex were taken as basic demographic parameters and IRX3 promoter methylation was added as the variable of interest. In the next block, eleven relevant clinical parameters deemed to be related to outcomes (Cardiac fibrosis, LVEF, Vmax, MPG, AVA, Plasma creatinine, NYHA-class, AF, CAD, DM, CRD) were automatically added stepwise using forward covariate selection based on likelihood ratio, until the most suitable model was reached. To compare the different models, − 2 log likelihood was used as a metric for evaluation. No Bonferroni correction was performed due to the study design as a pilot study.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Eveborn GW, Schirmer H, Heggelund G, Lunde P, Rasmussen K. The evolving epidemiology of valvular aortic stenosis. Tromsø Study Heart. 2013;99(6):396–400.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lorell BH, Carabello BA. Left ventricular hypertrophy. Circulation. 2000;102(4):470–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Vahanian A, Beyersdorf F, Praz F, Milojevic M, Baldus S, Bauersachs J, et al. 2021 ESC/EACTS guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease: developed by the task force for the management of valvular heart disease of the european society of cardiology (ESC) and the european association for cardio-thoracic surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2022;43(7):561–632.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bettencourt P. NT-proBNP and BNP: biomarkers for heart failure management. Eur J Heart Fail. 2004;6(3):359–63.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Babuin L, Jaffe AS. Troponin: the biomarker of choice for the detection of cardiac injury. CMAJ. 2005;173(10):1191–202.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Clavel MA, Malouf J, Michelena HI, Suri RM, Jaffe AS, Mahoney DW, et al. B-type natriuretic peptide clinical activation in aortic stenosis: impact on long-term survival. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63(19):2016–25.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gošev I, Zeljko M, Đurić Ž, Nikolić I, Gošev M, Ivčević S, et al. Epigenome alterations in aortic valve stenosis and its related left ventricular hypertrophy. Clin Epigenetics. 2017;9(1):106.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Puls M, Beuthner BE, Topci R, Vogelgesang A, Bleckmann A, Sitte M, et al. Impact of myocardial fibrosis on left ventricular remodelling, recovery, and outcome after transcatheter aortic valve implantation in different haemodynamic subtypes of severe aortic stenosis. Eur Heart J. 2020;41(20):1903–14.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Bing R, Cavalcante JL, Everett RJ, Clavel MA, Newby DE, Dweck MR. Imaging and impact of myocardial fibrosis in aortic stenosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019;12(2):283–96.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Brookes E, Shi Y. Diverse epigenetic mechanisms of human disease. Annu Rev Genet. 2014;48(1):237–68.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Jurkowska RZ, Jurkowski TP, Jeltsch A. Structure and function of mammalian DNA methyltransferases. ChemBioChem. 2011;12(2):206–22.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gao Y, Chen J, Li K, Wu T, Huang B, Liu W, et al. Replacement of Oct4 by Tet1 during iPSC induction reveals an important role of DNA methylation and hydroxymethylation in reprogramming. Cell Stem Cell. 2013;12(4):453–69.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Tahiliani M, Koh KP, Shen Y, Pastor WA, Bandukwala H, Brudno Y, et al. Conversion of 5-methylcytosine to 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in mammalian DNA by MLL partner TET1. Science. 2009;324(5929):930–5.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Schiano C, Benincasa G, Franzese M, Della Mura N, Pane K, Salvatore M, et al. Epigenetic-sensitive pathways in personalized therapy of major cardiovascular diseases. Pharmacol Ther. 2020;1(210):107514.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Radhakrishna U, Albayrak S, Alpay-Savasan Z, Zeb A, Turkoglu O, Sobolewski P, et al. Genome-wide DNA methylation analysis and epigenetic variations associated with congenital aortic valve stenosis (AVS). PLoS ONE. 2016;11(5):e0154010.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Nasu T, Satoh M, Ohmomo H, Shiwa Y, Komaki S, Ono K, et al. Epigenome-wide association study identifies a novel DNA methylation in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis. Circ Genom Precis Med. 2020;13(1):e002649.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Schwarzenbach H, Hoon DSB, Pantel K. Cell-free nucleic acids as biomarkers in cancer patients. Nat Rev Cancer. 2011;11(6):426–37.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Jahr S, Hentze H, Englisch S, Hardt D, Fackelmayer FO, Hesch RD, et al. DNA fragments in the blood plasma of cancer patients: quantitations and evidence for their origin from apoptotic and necrotic cells. Cancer Res. 2001;61(4):1659–65.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Stroun M, Maurice P, Vasioukhin V, Lyautey J, Lederrey C, Lefort F, et al. The origin and mechanism of circulating DNA. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2000;906(1):161–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Frank MO. Circulating cell-free DNA differentiates severity of inflammation. Biol Res Nurs. 2016;18(5):477–88.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Yokokawa T, Misaka T, Kimishima Y, Shimizu T, Kaneshiro T, Takeishi Y. Clinical significance of circulating cardiomyocyte-specific cell-free DNA in patients with heart failure: a proof-of-concept study. Can J Cardiol. 2020;36(6):931–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Mansueto G, Benincasa G, Della Mura N, Nicoletti GF, Napoli C. Epigenetic-sensitive liquid biomarkers and personalised therapy in advanced heart failure: a focus on cell-free DNA and microRNAs. J Clin Pathol. 2020;73(9):535–43.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Benincasa G, Marfella R, Della Mura N, Schiano C, Napoli C. Strengths and opportunities of network medicine in cardiovascular diseases. Circ J. 2020;84(2):144–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Napoli C, Benincasa G, Donatelli F, Ambrosio G. Precision medicine in distinct heart failure phenotypes: focus on clinical epigenetics. Am Heart J. 2020;1(224):113–28.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Briscoe J, Pierani A, Jessell TM, Ericson J. A homeodomain protein code specifies progenitor cell identity and neuronal fate in the ventral neural tube. Cell. 2000;101(4):435–45.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lu QR, Sun T, Zhu Z, Ma N, Garcia M, Stiles CD, et al. Common developmental requirement for olig function indicates a motor neuron/oligodendrocyte connection. Cell. 2002;109(1):75–86.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Smemo S, Tena JJ, Kim KH, Gamazon ER, Sakabe NJ, Gómez-Marín C, et al. Obesity-associated variants within FTO form long-range functional connections with IRX3. Nature. 2014;507(7492):371–5.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Gaborit N, Sakuma R, Wylie JN, Kim KH, Zhang SS, Hui CC, et al. Cooperative and antagonistic roles for Irx3 and Irx5 in cardiac morphogenesis and postnatal physiology. Development. 2012;139(21):4007–19.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Kim KH, Rosen A, Hussein SMI, Puviindran V, Korogyi AS, Chiarello C, et al. Irx3 is required for postnatal maturation of the mouse ventricular conduction system. Sci Rep. 2016;6(1):19197.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Koizumi A, Sasano T, Kimura W, Miyamoto Y, Aiba T, Ishikawa T, et al. Genetic defects in a His-Purkinje system transcription factor, IRX3, cause lethal cardiac arrhythmias. Eur Heart J. 2015;37(18):1469–75.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Xu X, Tan X, Tampe B, Nyamsuren G, Liu X, Maier LS, et al. Epigenetic balance of aberrant Rasal1 promoter methylation and hydroxymethylation regulates cardiac fibrosis. Cardiovasc Res. 2015;105(3):279–91.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Curradi M, Izzo A, Badaracco G, Landsberger N. Molecular mechanisms of gene silencing mediated by DNA methylation. Mol Cell Biol. 2002;22(9):3157–73.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Zemmour H, Planer D, Magenheim J, Moss J, Neiman D, Gilon D, et al. Non-invasive detection of human cardiomyocyte death using methylation patterns of circulating DNA. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):1443.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Halawa S, Latif N, Tseng YT, Ibrahim AM, Chester AH, Moustafa A, et al. Profiling Genome-Wide DNA Methylation Patterns in Human Aortic and Mitral Valves. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022;9:840647.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Weidemann F, Herrmann S, Störk S, Niemann M, Frantz S, Lange V, et al. Impact of myocardial fibrosis in patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis. Circulation. 2009;120(7):577–84.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Dweck MR, Joshi S, Murigu T, Alpendurada F, Jabbour A, Melina G, et al. Midwall fibrosis is an independent predictor of mortality in patients with aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58(12):1271–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Milano AD, Faggian G, Dodonov M, Golia G, Tomezzoli A, Bortolotti U, et al. Prognostic value of myocardial fibrosis in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012;144(4):830–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Galat A, Guellich A, Bodez D, Lipskaia L, Moutereau S, Bergoend E, et al. Causes and consequences of cardiac fibrosis in patients referred for surgical aortic valve replacement. ESC Heart Fail. 2019;6(4):649–57.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Minten L, Wissels P, McCutcheon K, Bennett J, Adriaenssens T, Desmet W, et al. The effect of coronary lesion complexity and preprocedural revascularization on 5-year outcomes after TAVR. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022;15(16):1611–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Kang DH, Park SJ, Lee SA, Lee S, Kim DH, Kim HK, et al. Early surgery or conservative care for asymptomatic aortic stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(2):111–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Sedaghat A, Sinning JM, Vasa-Nicotera M, Ghanem A, Hammerstingl C, Grube E, et al. The revised EuroSCORE II for the prediction of mortality in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Clin Res Cardiol. 2013;102(11):821–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Spampinato RA, Bochen R, Sieg F, Weiss S, Kornej J, Haunschild J, et al. Multi-biomarker mortality prediction in patients with aortic stenosis undergoing valve replacement. J Cardiol. 2020;76(2):154–62.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Parenica J, Nemec P, Tomandl J, Ondrasek J, Pavkova-Goldbergova M, Tretina M, et al. Prognostic utility of biomarkers in predicting of one-year outcomes in patients with aortic stenosis treated with transcatheter or surgical aortic valve implantation. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(12):e48851.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. White M, Baral R, Ryding A, Tsampasian V, Ravindrarajah T, Garg P, et al. Biomarkers associated with mortality in aortic stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Sci (Basel). 2021;9(2):29.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Villar AV, García R, Merino D, Llano M, Cobo M, Montalvo C, et al. Myocardial and circulating levels of microRNA-21 reflect left ventricular fibrosis in aortic stenosis patients. Int J Cardiol. 2013;167(6):2875–81.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Benincasa G, Maron BA, Affinito O, D’Alto M, Franzese M, Argiento P, et al. Association between circulating CD4(+) T cell methylation signatures of network-oriented SOCS3 gene and hemodynamics in patients suffering pulmonary arterial hypertension. J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2023;16(1):17–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Schiano C, Benincasa G, Infante T, Franzese M, Castaldo R, Fiorito C, et al. Integrated analysis of DNA methylation profile of HLA-G gene and imaging in coronary heart disease: pilot study. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(8):e0236951.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Zheng KH, Tzolos E, Dweck MR. Pathophysiology of aortic stenosis and future perspectives for medical therapy. Cardiol Clin. 2020;38(1):1–12.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Esteller M. CpG island hypermethylation and tumor suppressor genes: a booming present, a brighter future. Oncogene. 2002;21(35):5427–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Watson CJ, Horgan S, Neary R, Glezeva N, Tea I, Corrigan N, et al. Epigenetic therapy for the treatment of hypertension-induced cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2016;21(1):127–37.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Tampe B, Steinle U, Tampe D, Carstens JL, Korsten P, Zeisberg EM, et al. Low-dose hydralazine prevents fibrosis in a murine model of acute kidney injury–to–chronic kidney disease progression. Kidney Int. 2017;91(1):157–76.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Shi Y, Zhang H, Huang S, Yin L, Wang F, Luo P, et al. Epigenetic regulation in cardiovascular disease: mechanisms and advances in clinical trials. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2022;7(1):200.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Kappetein AP, Head SJ, Généreux P, Piazza N, van Mieghem NM, Blackstone EH, et al. Updated standardized endpoint definitions for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the valve academic research consortium-2 consensus document. Eur Heart J. 2012;33(19):2403–18.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Kustanovich A, Schwartz R, Peretz T, Grinshpun A. Life and death of circulating cell-free DNA. Cancer Biol Ther. 2019;20(8):1057–67.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Laktionov PP, Tamkovich SN, Rykova EYu, Bryzgunova OE, Starikov AV, Kuznetsova NP, et al. Cell-surface-bound nucleic acids: free and cell-surface-bound nucleic acids in blood of healthy donors and breast cancer patients. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2004;1022(1):221–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Tamkovich SN, Bryzgunova OE, Rykova EY, Permyakova VI, Vlassov VV, Laktionov PP. Circulating nucleic acids in blood of healthy male and female donors. Clin Chem. 2005;51(7):1317–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Meder B, Haas J, Sedaghat-Hamedani F, Kayvanpour E, Frese K, Lai A, et al. Epigenome-wide association study identifies cardiac gene patterning and a novel class of biomarkers for heart failure. Circulation. 2017;136(16):1528–44.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, Kaynig V, Longair M, Pietzsch T, et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods. 2012;9(7):676–82.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Annika Erdmann, Sarah Rinkleff and Anika Krueger for their technical assistance. We further thank Christine Meisinger and Dennis Freuer from Augsburg University, Chair of Epidemiology, for their critical opinion and advice on the Cox-regression analysis.

Funding

Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. This study was supported by German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK) grant MD23 to EZ, German Research Foundation (DFG) grant ZE524/2-3 to MZ and by the DFG under Germany's Excellence Strategy - EXC 2067/1-390729940 to EZ and GH. LK was supported by the Promotionskolleg of the University Medical Center Göttingen. We further acknowledge support by the Open Access Funds/transformative agreements of the Göttingen University.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Leon Kanwischer and Xingbo Xu have contributed equally to this work. Miriam Puls and Elisabeth M. Zeisberg have contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Cardiology and Pneumology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Georg-August-University, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37075, Göttingen, Germany

    Leon Kanwischer, Xingbo Xu, Afifa Binta Saifuddin, Sabine Maamari, Fouzi Alnour, Gerd Hasenfuss, Miriam Puls & Elisabeth M. Zeisberg

  2. Department of Nephrology and Rheumatology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Georg-August-University, Göttingen, Germany

    Xiaoying Tan, Björn Tampe & Michael Zeisberg

  3. Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Göttingen, Georg-August-University, Göttingen, Germany

    Thomas Meyer

  4. DZHK German Center for Cardiovascular Research, Partner Site Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany

    Leon Kanwischer, Xingbo Xu, Afifa Binta Saifuddin, Sabine Maamari, Xiaoying Tan, Fouzi Alnour, Thomas Meyer, Michael Zeisberg, Gerd Hasenfuss, Miriam Puls & Elisabeth M. Zeisberg

Authors
  1. Leon Kanwischer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xingbo Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Afifa Binta Saifuddin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sabine Maamari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Xiaoying Tan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Fouzi Alnour
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Björn Tampe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Thomas Meyer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Michael Zeisberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Gerd Hasenfuss
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Miriam Puls
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Elisabeth M. Zeisberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

LK conceived the experiments, collected and analyzed data, wrote the manuscript. XX conceived the experiments, collected and analyzed data, edited the manuscript. ABS collected and analyzed data. SM gave conceptual advice. XT collected and analyzed data. FA provided cardiac fibrosis data. BT edited the manuscript and gave conceptual advice. TM analyzed data. MZ edited the manuscript and gave conceptual advice. GH provided the dataset from which IRX3 was identified. MP provided clinical data of the patients. EMZ conceived the experiments and edited the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elisabeth M. Zeisberg.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The ethics committee of the University Medical Center Göttingen approved the study (application number: 10/5/16), and informed consent was obtained from each patient. All procedures were performed conforming to the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kanwischer, L., Xu, X., Saifuddin, A.B. et al. Low levels of circulating methylated IRX3 are related to worse outcome after transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with severe aortic stenosis. Clin Epigenet 15, 149 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13148-023-01561-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13148-023-01561-2

Keywords

Clinical Epigenetics

ISSN: 1868-7083

Contact us