Redescription and molecular characterisation of the fish ectoparasite Anilocra capensis Leach, 1818 (Isopoda: Cymothoidae), with description of six new species of Anilocra Leach, 1818 from Africa

Background Anilocra capensis Leach, 1818 is the only named species of Anilocra Leach, 1818 from South Africa. Anilocra is a large genus (> 40 species) with high levels of diversity reported from the Caribbean and Indo-West Pacific. Considering it is highly unlikely that all records of Anilocra from South Africa can be of a single species, the aim of this study was to better understand the diversity of Anilocra from this region and continent. Methods To redescribe A. capensis, the syntypes of A. capensis and specimens recorded as A. capensis from Africa were borrowed from the Natural History Museum, London, UK, and The iZiko South African Museum, Cape Town. Newly collected fresh samples of A. capensis were collected from off Cape Town, South Africa. Morphological redescriptions of the syntypes, and other museum and fresh material were conducted. Fresh samples were used to characterise molecularly A. capensis using the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 gene (cox1). Results Morphological analyses demonstrated that apart from A. capensis there are six Anilocra species new to science from Africa: Anilocra ianhudsoni n. sp., Anilocra bunkleywilliamsae n. sp., Anilocra paulsikkeli n. sp., Anilocra jovanasi n. sp., Anilocra angeladaviesae n. sp. and Anilocra hadfieldae n. sp. Of the species under study, specimens of A. capensis appear to demonstrate the most individual variation, which occurs in pleonite width, pleotelson form and uropod length. We determined that African species of Anilocra can be primarily differentiated by the proportional shape and size of the full body in dorsal view and pereonites 1, 6 and 7. Other defining morphological traits include proportional shape and size of the pereopods, and the antenna and antennula peduncles. Lastly, the molecular characterisation of A. capensis is provided and the interspecific divergence with Mediterranean species is smaller than that with Caribbean species. Conclusions The results of this study provide a detailed redescription of A. capensis and the first molecular barcode for this organism. Six new species of Anilocra from Africa are described, establishing that the diversity of Anilocra in this region is greater than previously known. With this new understanding of species differences, we can accurately conduct detailed molecular and ecological analyses of Anilocra from Africa with certainty of the organism under study.

Background Members of the isopod fish parasitic family Cymothoidae Leach, 1818 conspicuously infest the skin, buccal cavity, or gill chamber of their hosts. This family has a global distribution and there are more than 43 recognised genera [1]. One of the most commonly observed genera is Anilocra Leach, 1818, and it remains one of the best studied ecologically [2][3][4]. In fact, Anilocra was the first genus of a marine fish parasite to be described from South Africa [5].
Leach [6] erected Anilocra to accommodate three species. One of these species was Anilocra capensis Leach, 1818, collected in the Cape region of South Africa. In Schioedte & Meinert's (1879) redescription of A. capensis, the authors provided only two dorsal view drawings of the female, and one dorsal view drawing of the male [7]. Schioedte & Meinert (1879) did not examine Leach's type-material. Since 1879, no further supplemental redescription of A. capensis has been published. As a result, nearly all reports of Anilocra infestation on South African marine fishes have been recorded as A. capensis.
The majority of Anilocra have been reported from tropical environments, e.g. [8][9][10]. Although cymothoids are generally more speciose in tropical than in temperate environments, temperate systems are nonetheless diverse. Accordingly, Anilocra diversity in South Africa should be far greater than the single recorded species. This should particularly be the case as South Africa's coastline encompasses two oceans that span temperate to subtropical ecosystems. Moreover, these ecosystems are suitable for a diversity of potential fish hosts.
To test the aforementioned prediction, a review of A. capensis based on the syntypes and all other available material was warranted. We seek to provide descriptions of species of Anilocra from South Africa and the African continent in order to clarify and describe the diversity of Anilocra from the eastern Atlantic and western Indian Oceans. Moreover, we aim to provide molecular data for A. capensis so that future taxonomic studies can at a minimum describe Anilocra from Africa as A. capensis or a different species of Anilocra.

Specimen collection
In March 2017, specimens identified as Anilocra capensis with locality data from Africa, along with the syntypes of A. capensis were borrowed from the Natural History Museum, London, UK (NHM). We examined other specimens of Anilocra from outside South Africa from NHM to confirm or reject if they were A. capensis. In July 2017, all specimens labelled as Anilocra from The iZiko South African Museum, Cape Town (SAM) were borrowed. In April 2018, live A. capensis were collected from the Hottentot seabream, Pachymetopon blochii Valenciennes, at two localities: Cape Town Harbour wall and the False Bay Yacht Club harbour. Infested fishes were speared on SCUBA under the direction and permitting of Two Oceans Aquarium. The fresh material was preserved in 80% ethanol for later morphological analysis (see Table 1 for sample sizes and locality data). For some specimens, leg tissue was extracted using forceps and placed in 96% ethanol for molecular analysis.

Molecular analysis
Genomic DNA was extracted from 8 of the freshly collected A. capensis. A rapid DNA extraction method as described in the KAPA Express Extract Kit (Kapa Biosystems, Cape Town, South Africa) was used. Polymerase chain reactions (PCR) were used to amplify a 710 bp fragment of the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit gene (cox1) using the primer sets LCO 1490 and HCO 2198 [11]. PCR was performed using 12.5 μl Thermo Scientific DreamTaq PCR master mix (2×) (2× DreamTaq buffer, 0.4 mM of each dNTP, and 4 mM MgCl 2 ), 1.25 μl Table 1 Details of Anilocra species examined a One specimen may be transitional

Morphological data
Specimens of Anilocra were processed according to the techniques described in [13,14]. Dissection was permitted for specimens from SAM but not the NHM. Regarding the museum collection specimens in this study, SAM assigns one accession number per species and collection location, whereas NHM assigned one accession number per individual in most cases. Accession numbers from NHM are indicated with the abbreviation BMNH. Descriptions were prepared using DELTA (Descriptive Language for Taxonomy) [15] using a general character set for the Cymothoidae [16,17]. Ratios and measurements were rounded off to one decimal place and were made using maximum values of the specific measured article. Measurements were taken and ratios determined from ovigerous and non-ovigerous female (♀), and male (♂) specimens. Pleotelson length (TL) and width (W) for all specimens examined are reported as TL × W. All measurements are reported in millimeters (mm). Higher order classification follows Brandt & Poore [18]. Fish nomenclature follows FishBase [19].
To comply with the regulations set out in article 8.5 of the amended 2012 version of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN [20], details of all new taxa have been submitted to ZooBank. For each new taxon, the Life Science Identifier (LSID) is reported in the taxonomic summary.

Specimen summary
We identified from the museum loans and field collection A. capensis and six new species of Anilocra. These specimens can be distinguished using the key provided here. Sample sizes and locality data for each species are given in Table 1.

Molecular analyses
Comparative sequence analysis indicated that the intraspecific divergence of A. capensis was 1-7 nt (0.04%). The interspecific divergence between A. capensis and A. physodes was 63-74 nt (15.5%). The interspecific divergence between A. capensis and Caribbean species of from the Caribbean [24], Chile [25], Lebanon [26] and the Gulf of Mexico [27]. In 2017, using morphological and molecular data, Anilocra brillae [24] from the Caribbean was identified and described based on specimens that were originally thought to be Anilocra haemuli [8]. This revision is an example of the cryptic nature of some Anilocra spp., and the importance of combining morphological and molecular data whenever possible.
Of the skin-attaching cymothoids, species of Anilocra most closely resemble species of Renocila Miers, 1880 and Nerocila Leach, 1818, but generic level differences can be distinguished without dissection or stereoscopic microscope [28][29][30]. Briefly, in Anilocra spp. pereopod 7 is longer than 6, but in Renocila spp. pereopod 6 is similar in length to 7. The rostrum is not ventrally folded between the antennae in Renocila spp., but it is in Anilocra spp. The cephalon of Nerocila spp. is posteriorly strongly trilobed, whereas the cephalon of Anilocra spp. is not tri-lobed to very weakly tri-lobed. Further comparisons among cymothoid genera and generic features are detailed in Welicky et al. [24].
Antennula approximately as stout as antenna, comprised of 8 articles; peduncle articles 1 and 2 distinct, articulated. Antenna comprised of 8 articles.
Uropod more than half the length of pleotelson, peduncle 0.4 times as long as rami, peduncle lateral margin without setae or without medial short acute robust seta; rami extending beyond pleotelson, marginal setae absent, apices broadly rounded. Endopod apically rounded, 3.6 times as long as greatest width, lateral margin weakly convex, medial margin weakly convex. Exopod extending beyond end of endopod, 7.2 times as long as greatest width, apically rounded, lateral margin weakly convex, medial margin weakly convex, terminating without setae.
Uropod more than half the length of pleotelson, peduncle 0.7 times as long as rami, peduncle lateral margin without setae; rami extending beyond pleotelson, marginal setae absent, apices broadly rounded. Endopod apically rounded, 3.8 times as long as greatest width, lateral margin weakly convex, medial margin weakly convex. Exopod extending beyond end of endopod, 7 times as long as greatest width, apically rounded, lateral margin weakly convex, medial margin weakly convex, terminating without setae. terminal article terminating in 1-5 short simple setae, extending to middle of pereonite 1. Mandibular molar process ending in an acute incisor, with 23 simple setae. Maxillula simple, with 4 terminal robust setae. Maxilla medial lobe partly fused to lateral lobe; 2 recurved robust setae; and 2 large recurved robust setae. Maxilliped weakly segmented, with lamellar oostegite lobe or second, smaller oostegite lobe on basal part of article, article 3 with 3 recurved robust setae. Pereopod 1 basis 0.4 times as long as greatest width; ischium 1.9 times as long as basis; merus proximal margin without bulbous protrusion; carpus with straight proximal margin; propodus 2.0 times as long as wide; dactylus stout, 2.4 times as long as basal width. Pereopod 2 propodus 1.8 as long as wide; dactylus 1.3 as long as propodus. Pereopods gradually increasing in size towards posterior. Pereopod 6 basis 2.6 times as long as greatest width, ischium 0.4 times as long as basis, propodus 1.3 as long as wide, dactylus 1.4 as long as propodus. Pereopod 7 basis 2.6 times as long as greatest width; ischium 0.6 as long as basis, without protrusions; merus 1.1 times as long as wide, 0.5 as long as ischium; carpus 1.3 times as long as wide, 1 as long as ischium, without bulbous protrusion; propodus 2.4 times as long as wide, 0.7 as long as ischium; dactylus moderately slender, 1.1 times as long as propodus, 2.9 times as long as basal width.
Uropod more than half the length of pleotelson, peduncle 0.5 times as long as rami, peduncle lateral margin without setae or without medial short acute robust seta; rami extending beyond pleotelson, marginal setae absent, apices broadly rounded. Endopod apically rounded, 3.5 times as long as greatest width, lateral margin weakly convex, medial margin weakly convex. Exopod extending beyond end of endopod, 6 times as long as greatest width, apically rounded, lateral margin weakly convex, medial margin weakly convex, terminating without setae.

Remarks
Anilocra capensis has a proportionally large ovoid and vaulted body with distinctly flexed distolateral margins of the pereonite 7. The pleotelson is wider than long and broadly rounded and the distal-most article of the antenna peduncle has one convex lateral margin. This species has the greatest range in proportional size of adult females and shows the most intrinsic variation with regards to pleonite width and uropod length. This was evident in the syntypes as well as the new fresh material examined. The freshly fixed specimens can be grouped mainly into two categories: specimens where pleonite 3 is most narrow and 5 is widest, and specimens where pleonite 1 and 2 are widest. Within each of these groups, proportional size and uropod length is variable, but no general differences in variability can be discerned between the two groups. There also appears to be colour variation (dark brown to red-brown, or tan) in A. capensis, but all the other characters to this species are observed in both colour types. Given that varying pleon morphology is the only character that can create groups within A. capensis, this is not sufficient to determine that there are two species.
In the present study Anilocra capensis was found attached to the skin of host fish. It was situated below the anterior portion of the dorsal fin, facing anteriorly, and above and not blocking the operculum. This attachment site was consistent among all the freshly collected material.
Anilocra capensis can be differentiated from the other species described below based on body, pereonite, pereopod and/or antenna/antennule form. The body shape of A. capensis is not twisted, whereas Anilocra jovanasi n. sp. and Anilocra hadfieldae n. sp. have weakly twisted bodies. Compared to A. capensis, Anilocra paulsikkeli n. sp. is 0.86 times as wide at the widest point and has notable sub-parallel body margins, and Anilocra ianhudsoni n. sp. is strongly narrowed anteriorly. Anilocra capensis can be distinguished from Anilocra bunkleywilliamsae n. sp., as the latter is proportionally shorter, pereonite 1 is longer, the antenna and antennule are narrower, and it has chromatophores. Anilocra capensis can be differentiated from Anilocra angeladaviesae n. sp., as A. capensis has a pronounced curvature on the lateral margin of the propodus of pereopod 6 that A. angeladaviesae n. sp. lacks. There is an elongated lateral margin of article 3 of the antenna of A. angeladaviesae n. sp. that extends onto article 4, and this does not occur in A. capensis.
We note that the 200-year-old female paralectotypes were similar in shape and form to the fresh material, but their poor and fragile condition, along with missing some articles made it possible to only include a few reliable drawings without further damage. paralectotype examined was significantly larger and likely in a different and later developmental stage than the freshly collected males. There was consistency in size and form of the fresh male material examined, but during our collections and those loaned from SAM, we found no male similar in size to Leach's specimen.
It is important to note that the type-locality for A. capensis is Cape Town, South Africa, and the host is a sparid. Species of Anilocra are regarded as typically host specific to the family or genus level, and some even to the species level. Given this specificity and the general spatial distribution of A. capensis [31], it   Pleotelson 0.9 times as long as anterior width, dorsal surface smooth, lateral margins convex, posterior margin converging to weak caudomedial point.
Antennula more stout than antenna; comprised of 7 articles; peduncle articles 1 and 2 distinct, articulated; article 2 0.6 times as long as article 1; article 3 1 times as long as wide, 0.5 times as long as combined lengths of articles 1 and 2; flagellum with 4 articles, extending to middle of eye, terminal article with 1 plumose seta. Antenna comprised of 9 articles; peduncle article 3 1.4 times as long as article 2; article 4 1.5 times as long as wide, 1.1 times as long as article 3; article 5 1.5 times as long as wide, 1.2 times as long as article 4; flagellum with 4 articles, terminal article terminating in 1-5 short simple setae, extending to middle of pereonite 1. Mandibular molar process ending in an acute incisor, with 13 simple setae. Maxillula simple with 4 terminal robust setae. Maxilla medial lobe partly fused to lateral lobe; 2 recurved robust setae; and 2 large recurved robust setae. Maxilliped weakly segmented, with lamellar oostegite lobe or second, smaller oostegite lobe on basal part of article, palp article 2 with 0 simple setae, article 3 with 3 recurved robust setae.
Pereopod 1 basis 1.7 times as long as greatest width; ischium 0.7 times as long as basis; merus proximal margin without bulbous protrusion; carpus with straight proximal margin; propodus 1.8 times as long as wide; dactylus moderately slender, 1.2 as long as propodus, 2.7 times as long as basal width. Pereopod 2 propodus 1.2 as long as wide; dactylus 1.9 as long as propodus. Pereopods gradually increasing in size towards posterior. Pereopod 6 basis 2.3 times as long as greatest width, ischium 0.5 times as long as basis, propodus 1.2 as long as wide, dactylus 1.8 as long as propodus. Pereopod 7 basis 2.8 times as long as greatest width; ischium 0.6 as long as basis, without protrusions; merus proximal margin without bulbous protrusion, merus 1.5 times as long as wide, 0.6 as long as ischium; carpus 1.7 times as long as wide, 0.5 as long as ischium, without bulbous protrusion; propodus 3.1 times as long as wide, 0.9 as long as ischium; dactylus slender, 1.0 as long as propodus, 4.5 times as long as basal width.

Remarks
Anilocra ianhudsoni n. sp. is among the smaller of the Anilocra species that occur in South Africa. The body shape is unique as it has a diamond-triangulate shape, such that pereonites 1-3 narrow strongly. Unlike the other African species, A. ianhudsoni n. sp. has no flexed pereonite posterolateral margins. The antennula has a plumose seta on the terminal article and a maxilla with simple setae or 3 recurved robust setae. Anilocra ianhudsoni n. sp. also has more slender pereopods and a flatter and broader antenna compared to the other species described herein. Anilocra ianhudsoni n. sp. has a produced curvature on the lateral margin of the propodus of pereopod 6, which is similar to A. capensis and A. bunkleywilliamsae n. sp. Compared to Anilocra ianhudsoni n. sp., A. capensis and A. bunkleywilliamsae n. sp. both have broader, more ovoid pereonites, and a pleotelson that is closer in width to total body width. as long as ischium, without bulbous protrusion; propodus 2.8 times as long as wide, 1 as long as ischium; dactylus slender, 1 as long as propodus, 3.6 times as long as basal width. Dense chromatophores present on 1-7. Exopod larger than endopod. Pleopod 1 exopod 1.4 times as long as wide, lateral margin weakly convex, distally narrowly rounded, medial margin weakly oblique, medial margin weakly convex; endopod 1.6 times as long as wide, lateral margin weakly convex, distally narrowly rounded, medial margin slightly convex, peduncle 2.9 times as wide as long, without retinaculae. Pleopods 2-5 similar to pleopod 1. Pleopods 3-5 endopods proximal borders do not extend below exopod to peduncle. Peduncle lobes absent.

Type-host:
Uropod more than half the length of pleotelson, peduncle 0.5 times as long as rami, peduncle lateral margin without setae; rami extending beyond pleotelson, marginal setae absent, apices narrowly rounded. Endopod apically rounded, 5 times as long as greatest width, lateral margin weakly convex, medial margin weakly convex, terminating with 0 setae. Exopod extending beyond end of endopod, 9.7 times as long as greatest width, apically rounded, lateral margin weakly convex, medial margin weakly convex, terminating without setae.

Remarks
Anilocra bunkleywilliamsae n. sp. is most readily distinguished from all other African species as it has the most anteriorly rounded and arched rostrum, and more setae on the antennula and antenna of the species described herein. It also has large and dense chromatophores on its pereopods. The chromatophores are denser on the left side when in dorsal view.
Compared to A. capensis, the body of A. bunkleywilliamsae n. sp. is more ovoid, and pereopod 2 has robust setae present. Compared to A. ianhudsoni n. sp., A. bunkleywilliamsae n. sp. is generally smaller, its pleotelson converges more and is rounder, and its dactyls are shorter. The ovate and non-twisted body shape of A. bunkleywilliamsae n. sp. makes it distinguishable from A. paulsikkeli n. sp. which is long and narrow, and A. jovanasi n. sp. and A. hadfieldae n. sp. which are weakly twisted. Anilocra bunkleywilliamsae n. sp.is most similar in pereonite shape to A. angeladaviesae n. sp., but these species can be differentiated from each other as A. angeladaviesae n. sp. has no produced curvature on the lateral margin of the propodus of pereopod 6, its pereopods are more slender, and the general shape and form of the antenna and antennula are dissimilar. 2.7 times as long as greatest width, ischium 0.5 times as long as basis, propodus 2.6 as long as wide, dactylus 1 as long as propodus. Pereopod 7 basis 2.4 times as long as greatest width; ischium 0.7 as long as basis, without protrusions; merus proximal margin without bulbous protrusion, merus 1.7 times as long as wide, 0.6 as long as ischium; carpus 1.5 times as long as wide, 0.44 as long as ischium, without bulbous protrusion; propodus 4.3 times as long as wide, 1.1 as long as ischium; dactylus slender, 0.9 as long as propodus, 4.4 times as long as basal width. Pleopods without setae, exopod larger than endopod. Pleopod 1 exopod 2.1 times as long as wide, lateral margin weakly convex, distally narrowly rounded, medial margin weakly oblique, medial margin weakly convex; endopod 2.2 times as long as wide, lateral margin weakly convex, distally narrowly rounded, medial margin slightly convex, peduncle 2.0 times as wide as long, without retinaculae. Pleopods 3-5 endopods proximal borders do not extend below exopod to peduncle. Peduncle lobes absent. Uropod more than half the length of pleotelson, peduncle 0.7 times as long as rami, lateral margin without setae; rami extending to pleotelson apex, marginal setae absent, apices broadly rounded. Endopod apically rounded, 3.3 times as long as greatest width, lateral margin weakly convex, medial margin weakly convex, terminating with 0 setae. Exopod not extending to end of endopod, 6.7 times as long as greatest width, apically rounded, lateral margin weakly convex, medial margin weakly convex, terminating without setae.

Remarks
Anilocra paulsikkeli n. sp. has a distinctive elongate, narrow body, with sub-parallel lateral margins. Pleonite 1 is partly covered by pereonite 7. The lateral margins of the pleotelson are sub-parallel and from the last third of the pleotelson there is a strong convergence to a rounded medial point. The eyes of A. paulsikkeli n. sp. are nearly one-quarter the width of the cephalon. Anilocra paulsikkeli n. sp. is similar to A. leptosoma, but there are multiple differences. Anilocra paulsikkeli n. sp. is larger (3.7 times as long as wide whereas A. leptosoma is 3.4 times as long as wide), the first antenna article 3 is not produced, pleonite 1 is more concealed, and the posterior margin of the pleonites are straighter. Aneesh et al. [34] recently resdescribed A. leptosoma but did not examine the A. leptosoma lectotype material, and the drawings of Aneesh are in disagreement with Bruce 1987's drawings of the lectotype. In Aneesh et al. [34], Fig. 1d, e appear to not resemble A. leptosoma, and are more similar to A. capensis, with respect to body shape and form in dorsal view. Aneesh et al. [34] likely did not identify A. leptosoma. To identify the species these authors report on, specimens should be further examined morphologically, and molecular data should be provided.
Anilocra paulsikkeli n. sp. is also similar to Anilocra caudata Bovallius, 1887 but can be distinguished from A. caudata, by the wider pleotelson, pleonite 1 not being covered by pereonite 7 and the lateral margins of pleonite 5 are more acute.
Compared to the other species described herein, A. paulsikkeli n. sp. and A. jovanasi n. sp. are most similar. Both species have nodules that occur midway on the lateral margins of the dactyls of pereopods 1 and 2, but the nodules are larger on A. paulsikkeli n. sp. Anilocra jovanasi n. sp. also has antennula peduncle article 3 more strongly produced than that of A. paulsikkel n. sp.

Type-host: Unknown.
Type-locality: Delagoa Bay, Mozambique. Type-material: Holotype ♀ (20.0 × 7.0, dissected) (SAMC-A091296). Unknown collector. ZooBank registration: The Life Science Identifier (LSID) for Anilocra jovanasi n. sp. is urn:lsid:zoobank. org:act:DA044D6D-CA90-4E20-9D76-1D6FD636569C. Etymology: This species is named for Professor Jo G. van As (1949-2018), the late aquatic parasitologist and PhD advisor of the second author (NJS). Professor van As revived the field of aquatic parasitology in South Africa in the 1970s and all current active aquatic parasitologists in South Africa are either his former students, or a student of one of his former students. His contribution to the field of aquatic parasitology in South Africa is hereby acknowledged. Antenna comprised of 10 articles; peduncle article 3 1.7 times as long as article 2; article 4 1.4 times as long as wide, 1.4 times as long as article 3; article 5 2.6 times as long as wide, 1.5 times as long as article 4; flagellum with 5 articles, articles 8-9 with setae, terminal article terminating in 1-5 short simple setae, extending to middle of pereonite 1. Mandibular molar process present, with 20 simple setae. Maxilla medial lobe partly fused to lateral lobe; 2 recurved robust setae; and 2 large recurved robust setae. Maxilliped weakly segmented, with lamellar oostegite lobe, palp article 2 with 0 simple setae, article 3 with 3 recurved robust setae. Oostegites margin covered in numerous plumose setae. Pereopod 1 basis 2.7 times as long as greatest width; ischium 0.6 times as long as basis; merus proximal margin without bulbous protrusion; carpus with straight proximal margin; propodus 2 times as long as wide; dactylus slender, 1.2 as long as propodus, 3.2 times as long as basal width. Pereopod 2 propodus 2.15 as long as wide; dactylus 1 as long as propodus. Pereopods gradually increasing in size towards posterior. Pereopod 6 basis 2.91 times as long as greatest width, ischium 0.5 times as long as basis, propodus 2.6 as long as wide, dactylus 1.1 as long as propodus. Pereopod 7 basis 3.1 times as long as greatest width; ischium 0.6 as long as basis, without protrusions; merus proximal margin without bulbous protrusion, merus 2.0 times as long as wide, 0.7 as long as ischium; carpus 1.9 times as long as wide, 0.6 as long as ischium, without bulbous protrusion; propodus 3.2 times as long as wide, 0.9 as long as ischium; dactylus slender, 0.86 as long as propodus, 5.0 times as long as basal width.

Remarks
The body Anilocra jovanasi n. sp. is weakly twisted and narrowly ovoid. In dorsal view, the antennula appears geniculate due to the anterodistal lateral angle of the third article; pereopods 6 and 7 possess few robust setae. Anilocra jovanasi n. sp. is the only species described in southern Africa with the posterolateral margins of the fifth pleonite extending onto the dorsal portion of the pleotelson.
Anilocra jovanasi n. sp. is most similar in body shape to A. leptosoma, and A. paulsikkeli n. sp. However, the body of A. leptosoma is not twisted and the pleotelson converges strongly to a distinct point, whereas in A. jovanasi n. sp., the body is straight and the pleotelson converges broadly to a very weak point. The pleotelsons of A. paulsikkeli n. sp. and A. jovanasi n. sp. are similar in shape until the last third, at which point the lateral margins of the pleotelson of A. jovanasi n. sp. converge broadly to a very weak point, and those of A. paulsikkeli n. sp. converge strongly to a broad medial point. Moreover, pleonite 1 of A. jovanasi n. sp. is substantially more visible than that of A. paulsikkeli n. sp. Whereas A. paulsikkeli n. sp. has distinct nodules on the dactyls of pereopods 1 and 2, this is present only on pereopod 1 of A. jovanasi n. sp. The propodus of pereopod 2 is without a curved produced curvature on the lateral margin, separating it from A. capensis and A. bunkleywilliamsae n. sp. Anilocra ianhudsoni n. sp. has a distinctly different body form and its pereopods 6 and 7 are more dense in robust setae. Anilocra angeladaviesae n. sp. is more robustly ovoid, with a broader pleotelson than A. jovanasi n. sp. Anilocra hadfieldae n. sp. also has a weakly twisted body, but compared to A. jovanasi n. sp., it has a more produced pointed lateral margin of pleonite 7 and a medial indent on the pleotelson.

Anilocra angeladaviesae n. sp.
Syn. Anilocra capensis Monod, 1924 Type-host: Uncertain (see Remarks). Pereopod 1 basis 2.8 times as long as greatest width; ischium 1.9 times as long as basis; merus proximal margin without bulbous protrusion; carpus with straight proximal margin; propodus 1.8 times as long as wide; dactylus stout, 1.1 as long as propodus, 2.3 times as long as basal width. Pereopod 2 propodus 2.3 as long as wide; dactylus 0.9 as long as propodus. Pereopods gradually increasing in size towards posterior. Pereopod 6 basis 3 times as long as greatest width, ischium 0.6 times as long as basis, propodus 1.2 as long as wide, dactylus 2 as long as propodus. Pereopod 7 basis 2.0 times as long as greatest width; ischium 0.7 as long as basis, without protrusions; merus proximal margin without bulbous protrusion, merus 1.3 times as long as wide, 0.6 as long as ischium; carpus 1.4 times as long as wide, 0.5 as long as ischium, without bulbous protrusion; propodus 2.1 times as long as wide, 0.7 as long as ischium; dactylus slender, 1 as long as propodus, 2.9 times as long as basal width.
Pleopods without setae, exopod larger than endopod. Uropod more than half the length of pleotelson, peduncle lateral margin without setae; rami not extending beyond pleotelson, marginal setae absent, apices narrowly rounded. Endopod apically rounded, 3.7 times as long as greatest width, lateral margin weakly convex, medial margin weakly convex, terminating with 0 setae. Exopod extending beyond end of endopod, 6.0 times as long as greatest width, apically rounded, lateral margin weakly convex, medial margin weakly convex, terminating without setae.

Remarks
Anilocra angeladaviesae n. sp. can best be identified by the distinct elongate lateral margin on the third article of the antenna peduncle that appears to partially cover the lateral margin of the fourth article; the antennule is nearly half the length of the antenna; the body is ovoid and pereonites 1-3 narrow weakly towards the cephalon.
It is likely that the specimens examined here are those mentioned by Monod as A. capensis from Morocco [35] because the material examined from NHM was collected by Monod in 1923, and is clearly labelled as A. capensis from Morocco. Monod [35] referenced the genus names, Sama and Dentex, and the species, Morone punctata (current accepted name is Dicentrarchus punctatus Bloch, 1792).
Compared to Schioedte & Meinert's [7] drawings of A. physodes, the pereonite margins and pleotelson of A. angeladaviesae n. sp. are much straighter and less acute, respectively. Compared to A. capensis, A. angeladaviesae n. sp. has a narrower pleonite 1 in some specimens. Anilocra angeladaviesae n. sp. lacks the curved lateral margin of the pereopod 6 propodus, which is present on both A. capensis and A. bunkleywilliamsae n. sp. Anilocra bunkleywilliamsae n. sp. also has large dense chromatophores that are not present on A. angeladaviesae n. sp. Anilocra paulsikkeli n. sp. and A. jovanasi n. sp. are both more elongate and have nodules on pereopods 1 and 2 compared to A. angeladaviesae n. sp. Anilocra angeladaviesae n. sp. has a more rounded rostrum and posterior margin of pereonite 7 and more ovoid body compared to A. hadfieldae n. sp. Antennula approximately as stout as antenna, comprised of 8 articles; peduncle articles 1 and 2 distinct and articulated; article 2 1.3 times as long as article 1; article 3 1 times as long as wide, 0.4 times as long as combined lengths of articles 1 and 2; flagellum with 5 articles, extending to middle of eye. Antenna comprised of 9 articles; peduncle article 3 1.6 times as long as article 2; article 4 1.4 times as long as wide, 0.9 times as long as article 3; article 5  as long as propodus. Pereopod 7 basis 2.8 times as long as greatest width; ischium 0.6 as long as basis, without protrusions; 0.8 as long as ischium; carpus 1.6 times as long as wide, 0.7 as long as ischium, without bulbous protrusion; propodus 1.9 times as long as wide, 0.8 as long as ischium; dactylus stout, 0.9 as long as propodus, 2.9 times as long as basal width. Pleopods without setae, exopod larger than endopod. Uropod peduncle 0.5 times as long as rami, lateral margin without setae; rami not extending beyond pleotelson, marginal setae absent, apices narrowly rounded. Endopod apically rounded, 5 times as long as greatest width, lateral margin weakly convex, medial margin weakly convex, terminating with 0 setae. Exopod extending to end of endopod or extending beyond end of endopod. Male. [BMNH1952.9.9.29-30; Fig. 20.] Size 30.0 × 9.0. Male similar to female but smaller. Body weakly twisted, ovoid, 2.9 times as long as wide. Pleopod 2 appendix masculina with parallel margins, distally narrowed.

Remarks
Anilocra hadfieldae n. sp. has a distinct body shape. The body is more parallel than ovoid and the posterior lateral margins of pereonite 7 are substantially more acute than round and more obviously bent upward; pereopods 7 have small and light pigmentation and the pleotelson has a distinct medial indentation. The eyes are proportionally narrower than the other species described above.
The antenna and antennula of Anilocra hadfieldae n. sp. differ from that of A. capensis, the latter being stouter. The antenna peduncle articles of A. hadfieldae n. sp. have more parallel lateral margins than those of A. angeladaviesae n. sp. Anilocra hadfieldae n. sp. has no nodules or curved lateral produced margins of the pereopods, making it distinct from A. capensis, A. bunkleywilliamsae n. sp., A. paulsikkeli n. sp., and A. jovanasi n. sp.

Discussion
Anilocra capensis has been perhaps the most utilised (but not necessarily correct) name for any species of Anilocra in South Africa and likely in other areas of Africa, too. This is not surprising as only two drawings of adult female A. capensis existed before the present work. With few data on A. capensis and other African species, it was a logical pitfall to identify species of Anilocra collected from South Africa and elsewhere in Africa as A. capensis. This paper provides a detailed description of one of the original named species, and descriptions of six species new to science and thus will aid in the correct identification of these organisms. It is important to note that our molecular findings were unexpected as the nucleotide-and p-distance values between A. capensis and other Anilocra showed at levels more similar to differences observed between genera [24]. In order to better quantify species and genus level differences within the family Cymothoidae, multi-gene phylogenetic analyses of old and new world species that are specifically linked to correct morphological identification are needed.

Conclusions
The findings of this work should greatly reduce further misidentification of A. capensis. We provide morphological drawings and quantitative and qualitative descriptions of this species, as well as relevant comparisons among the six new species of Anilocra from Africa. By providing the first molecular data for A. capensis, we also contribute to improving the identification of cryptic species via molecular analyses. We also demonstrate the value of morphological data as we found an ample number of morphological differences among the closely similar species described herein. In particular, our A. capensis redescription validates the name A. capensis, and provides critical baseline data to understand species differences of African species of Anilocra.