The role of cytoreductive nephrectomy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma in immune-oncology era (SEVURO-CN): study protocol for a multi-center, prospective, randomized trial

Background The role of cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) remains unclear in the immuno-oncology (IO) era. The results of two randomized trials, CARMENA and SURTIME, questioned the role and timing of CN. However, despite the latest advances in the systemic treatment of mRCC, previous trials have only used targeted therapy, and no studies have fully investigated the role of CN in immune checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) settings, and there is an urgent need for future studies to better define the role and timing of CN. Methods This study is an open-label, multi-center, parallel, prospective, randomized, interventional clinical study to evaluate the efficacy of CN in combination with CPIs in mRCC patients with International mRCC Database Consortium (IMDC) intermediate- and poor-risk. Synchronous mRCC patients with ≤ 3 IMDC risk features will be randomly allocated to three groups (1, upfront CN; 2, deferred CN; and 3, systemic therapy [ST] only). For ST, the nivolumab plus ipilimumab combination regimen, one of the standard regimens for intermediate- and poor-risk mRCC, is chosen. The primary endpoint is overall survival. The secondary endpoints are progression-free survival, objective response rate, number of participants with treatment-related adverse events, and number of participants with surgical morbidity. We will analyze the genetic mutation profiles of the tumor tissue, circulating tumor DNA, urine tumor DNA, and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. The gut and urine microbial communities will be analyzed. The study will begin in 2022 and will enroll 55 patients. Discussion This study is one of the few prospective randomized trials to evaluate the benefit of CN in the treatment of synchronous mRCC in the IO era. The SEVURO-CN trial will help identify the role and timing of CN, thereby rediscovering the value of CN. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05753839. Registered on 3 March 2023. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-024-08234-2.


Background
Annually, over 75,000 individuals are newly diagnosed with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in the USA, and its incidence is increasing [1].Although the majority of RCC are diagnosed as localized cases, approximately one-third of patients have synchronous metastasis [2].Nearly 14,000 cancer-specific deaths have been reported in the USA [1], with 5-year survival rates for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) being quite low (0-20%), establishing it as a deadly disease [3][4][5][6].
Based on two randomized trials, cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) was previously considered the standard treatment for the management of patients with mRCC with a good performance status [7,8].However, these studies were performed in the era of interferon therapy [7,8], and dramatic advancements in systemic therapies have questioned the utility of CN.Two prospective randomized trials, CARMENA [9] and SUR-TIME [10], changed the standard first-line treatment for mRCC by downsizing the role of CN.
However, recently updated analyses of the CARMENA trial have suggested that some patients still benefit from CN [11].Furthermore, the development of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has revolutionized the treatment landscape [12], disrupting the treatment paradigm for mRCC and further complicating the definition of the role of CN.ICIs are now the standard of care for patients with intermediate-and poor-risk diseases.However, the CARMENA and SURTIME trials were performed in the tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) era [13]; therefore, current clinical data on ICIs are limited.The role of CN in patients with high-risk localized tumors and favorableto-intermediate-risk metastatic tumors falls into a gray zone [14].Therefore, rather than a black-and-white approach, a combination of surgery and systemic therapy is likely to be beneficial for these patients [15].
The theoretical benefits of CN remain unclear, but the postulated mechanisms include the removal of the immunological sink, reduction in potential interaction between the primary tumor and its metastatic sites, and removal of possible de novo metastatic disease that stems from the renal primary [14,16].
Two ongoing phase 3 randomized clinical trials (RCTs), PROBE (NCT04510597) and NORDICSUN (NCT03977571), are currently investigating the role of deferred versus no CN, and neither trial has included an upfront CN arm.Furthermore, no studies have been presented regarding the association between the analysis of clinical samples from the tumor tissue, blood, urine, and feces, and clinical parameters to develop biomarkers.Finally, a patient selection model for upfront CN in immuno-oncology (IO) era has never been presented.

Objectives
The primary aim of this study is to investigate the role of CN in overall survival (OS).Our secondary aim is to investigate the role of CN in the progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), number of participants with treatment-related adverse events, and number of participants with surgical morbidity.
Furthermore, we will collect samples (tumor tissue, blood, urine, and feces) not only to explore the effects of CN in the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) by analyzing genetic mutations and microbiome profiles but also to establish a biobank for future studies that search for biomarkers focusing on identifying survival outcomes, therapeutic responses, and patient selection.

Study design
The current study is a prospective, randomized, open-label, multicenter, interventional, superiority clinical trial with a parallel-arm design, and will be conducted at the Yonsei University Health System (YUHS), which includes Severance Hospital, Gangnam Severance Hospital, and Yonsei Severance Hospital.After the startup phase, we will expand the study to other South Korean centers.The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov(NCT05753839).This trial complied with Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) guidelines.The SPIRIT checklist can be found in Additional file 1.All data will be anonymized and collected on structured case reporting forms.
This study will investigate whether upfront or deferred CN improves oncological outcomes (OS and PFS) in patients with synchronous mRCC and ≤ 3 International mRCC Database Consortium (IMDC) risk features compared to immune checkpoint inhibitors (nivolumab plus ipilimumab combination) alone.
To understand the role of CN in immuno-oncology, we will collect and analyze clinical data and samples (tumor tissue, blood, urine, and stool samples).

Primary endpoint
The primary endpoint is OS (in months) compared between patients receiving upfront CN, deferred CN, and ICIs only.

Recruitment and consent
Overall patient recruitment will be supervised at Severance Hospital, where the project leader and the research center are located, and each center will recruit patients under the guidance of Severance Hospital.A multidisciplinary team composed of urologists, medical oncologists, and radiologists will determine patient selection under strict inclusion and exclusion criteria and regularly update these criteria as necessary.
Patients diagnosed with synchronous mRCC with clear-cell components and no prior therapy will be recruited.The study information will be provided to the patients during the first consultation and asked for their participation the next day, giving them sufficient time to consider.During patient participation, the most current written informed consent approved by the Ethics Committee (Additional file 2) will be obtained before any project-specific assessment or procedure.No study-related activities will begin before the informed consent form is signed.The participants will be allowed to retire at any point during the study.This information is clearly stated in the consent form.

Compensation
Although no compensation will be provided for patients in this study, future patients would benefit greatly.Participation will be voluntary, and the management of patients will comply with current standards of care.

Patients
Patient selection is based on the following inclusion, dropout, and exclusion criteria.

Inclusion criteria
• Core needle biopsy-proven metastatic renal cell carcinoma-only clear cell histologic subtypes are acceptable.• Synchronous metastatic renal cell carcinoma with a primary tumor in the kidney.• The patient must be willing to provide their humanderived materials.• Age ≥ 19 years.
• Signed written informed consent must be obtained from all patients prior to any study-specific procedures.
• The patient must be willing and able to comply with the protocol.

Dropout criteria
If a subject fulfills any of the following dropout criteria, they will be discontinued from the middle of the study: • Patients who do not want to participate in the study.

• Patients who fall into the exclusion criteria during
the study (such as the patients who need for starting systemic corticosteroids, antibiotics, investigational drugs, etc., during the study).• Patients with severe side effects during the treatment and treatment can no longer be continued according to the schedule.• Patients who do not adhere to the protocol of the study.

Exclusion criteria
If a subject fulfills any of the following exclusion criteria, they may not be included: • Prior systemic treatment for mRCC.

Group-specific criteria
Group A: Upfront CN: cytoreductive nephrectomy ± metastasectomy, followed by induction therapy with nivolumab plus ipilimumab, and maintenance therapy with nivolumab.Group B: Deferred CN: cytoreductive nephrectomy ± metastasectomy after induction therapy with nivolumab plus ipilimumab, followed by maintenance therapy with nivolumab.
Group C: No surgery: induction therapy with nivolumab plus ipilimumab followed by maintenance therapy with nivolumab.

Study timeline
After completing the recruitment procedure, clinical and pathological data were collected (Table 1).A flowchart of the study is shown in Fig. 1.Patients will be evaluated for eligibility for surgery.If they are not eligible for surgery, they will start ICI therapy (induction phase).Then, they will be assessed for whether they are eligible for surgery.If not, they will continue with ICI therapy (maintenance phase) (Group C).If they are eligible for surgery, they will be randomly allocated to the deferred CN group (Group B) or ICIs only.If they are eligible for surgery at the first visit, they will be randomly allocated to the upfront CN Group A (group A) or the deferred CN group (Group B).Patients will be randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio using a computer-generated allocation sequence by a local project nurse.The randomization will be performed on an institutional basis to prevent bias.
Candidates for CN are patients with good performance status (Karnofsky performance status ≥ 80%) and less than three IMDC risk features and whose primary tumor could be surgically removed.Metastasectomy can be performed when the metastatic sites can be surgically removed.All patients eligible for ICI therapy will receive four cycles of intravenous nivolumab (3 mg/kg) plus ipilimumab (1 mg/kg) every 3 weeks as the induction phase, followed by a response evaluation.After the induction phase, intravenous nivolumab (3 mg/kg) will be administered 6 times every 2 weeks as the maintenance phase, followed by response evaluation.Nivolumab monotherapy will be maintained for a maximum of 2 years for those without adverse side effects.During ICI therapy, adverse events will be evaluated once per cycle.Patients will discontinue ICI therapy when they develop serious adverse events, including grade 3 or worse, according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0 (CTCAE v 5.0).In the upfront CN group, the induction phase will be within 6 weeks of surgery, whereas in the deferred CN group, surgery will be performed within 6 weeks of the induction phase.The study will be conducted over a period of 5 years.

Sample collection
Tumor tissue, blood, urine, and stool specimens for translational biomarker research will be sampled at the baseline visit, during surgery, 3 months after induction therapy, and 3 months after maintenance therapy.Embedded future studies will have their specific protocol and will obtain specific approval from the ethics committee separately.The tumor tissue from the participants will be obtained from a core needle biopsy sample (20 mg) or a surgically excised sample (1 g) of the viable tumor portion confirmed by the pathologist.Blood (10 mL for plasma) will be drawn when a medically required blood draw is present.Midstream urine (10 mL) and fecal (2-3 cc) samples will be collected from patients using the information leaflet provided.Samples will be collected 3-4 times, and an overview of the planned sample collection is shown in Tables 2, 3, and 4. All samples will be anonymously labeled with a pseudo-patient study identifier.

Public and patient involvement statement
Neither public nor patients were involved in the protocol development and study design.

Sample size justification
Two prospective RCTs, PROBE (NCT04510597) and NORDICSUN (NCT03977571), are currently ongoing, but do not include an upfront CN arm.We determined the sample size based on the most recent real-world data that analyzed the intermediate/high risk group of mRCC patients stratified into upfront CN, deferred CN, and systemic treatment group [17].To determine the required sample size for the study, we utilized two calculators for two-group survival analysis [18].For Calculator 1, with a two-tailed alpha level (α) set at 0.05 and a beta level (β) of 0.2, along with a proportion of subjects in Group 1 (upfront and deferred CN) of 0.66 and a proportion in Group 0 (ICIs only) of 0.34, the relative hazard was set at 0.37.The calculated number of events needed to achieve 80% power was 35.For Calculator 2, with the total number of events set at 35, and assuming a baseline event rate of 0.53 and a median survival time in Group 0 (ICIs only) of 1.3 years, along with a censoring rate of 0.1 and a planned average length of follow-up of 5 years, the sample sizes required for each group were determined.Therefore, a total of 57 subjects were needed for the study.

Statistical analysis
Descriptive statistics will be used to assess clinicopathological characteristics.Mean values and standard deviation will be provided for continuous variables, whereas frequency and percentage distributions will be provided for categorical variables.Groups will be compared using the chi-square test for categorical variables and the Student's t-test for continuous variables.The Kaplan-Meier and log-rank test method and log-rank test will be used to estimate and compare OS and PFS.Univariate and multivariate survival analyses will be conducted using the Cox proportional hazards model, which will provide hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).For subjects without endpoints or who violate the study protocol will be excluded.Statistical analysis will be performed using SPSS software (version 25.0; IBM, Armonk, NY) and R software [V.3.6.2 (http:// www.R-proje ct.org)].The significance level will be set at P < 0.05, and all statistical tests will be two-sided.Microbiome analyses will be conducted using 16S rRNA sequencing to determine the differences in alpha diversity among the three groups by calculating the Shannon, Chao1, and Simpson indices.Beta diversity will be generated using the weighted UniFrac distance and visualized using a principal component analysis plot.Between-group differences were analyzed using multivariate analysis of variance with permutation.Furthermore, subgroup analysis according to the number and location of metastasis will be performed.

Oversight and monitoring
We have composed a study coordinating center and data management and monitoring team.The study coordinating center is composed of a project general manager (JSP) and project manager at each institution (JK, and JJ) which decides on the study protocol and performance after internal discussion and has responsibility for each study process.The data management and monitoring team consists of WSJ and WKH, which is independent of competing interests, will be composed to monitor data safety and access to the final dataset.
All patient data collected and processed will be managed by the investigators with adequate precautions to ensure the confidentiality of the data.All samples will be saved and stored in a pseudonymized form.

Interim analyses
The data management and monitoring team monitors safety outcomes and provides recommendations regarding the continuation or premature termination of the trial.No interim analyses concerning efficacy are performed.We planned two interim statistical analyses on safety during the course of this study, after approximately 25% and 50% of the inclusion.The only stopping condition is based on safety.The decision to stop or continue is made by the trial team based on the advice of the data management and monitoring team.The risk of lifethreatening immune-related adverse complications will be evaluated.

Data management and checks
The data management and monitoring team will be responsible for overseeing the receiving, entering, cleaning, querying, analyzing, and storing of all data that accrues from the study by designated persons.Each month, this team will randomly check the files in all three centers.Furthermore, daily monitoring of the data will be done by the members of the study coordinating center to minimize entry errors.All data will be stored on accesscontrolled computers and servers in line with data security policies.Databases will be backed up monthly.

Adherence with study protocol
Non-adherence with the trial protocol will be reported and will be dropped out from the study.

Missing data
Missing data will be minimized by performing a thorough data cleaning process until data are either received, confirmed as unavailable or the trial has reached the analysis stage.If missing for less than 5% of participants, these missing values will be imputed using mean or median values (depending on the distribution of non-missing data) for the whole cohort.If missing for more than 5% of participants, then multiple imputation will be considered.

Ethics
The study has been approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the YUHS (approval nos.4-2022-1453, 2023-0318-001, 2022-0618-001) and will be performed in accordance with the principles enunciated in the current version of the Declaration of Helsinki.Each substantial protocol amendment will be notified for approval to the IRB of the YUHS prior to implementation.

Dissemination plan
Upon completion of the study, we intend to present the results as oral communications and abstracts at national and international urological meetings.The results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.Publication policy of this trial has been negotiated and specified in contractual obligations and agreements between involved investigators.

Discussion
The optimal use of CN in mRCC settings remains unclear, especially in ICI therapy settings [19], where the most recent evidence has been generated in the TKI era [19].Although the potential of CN in the primitive IO era has drawn attention, no studies have thoroughly evaluated the role of CN in ICI therapy in patients with mRCC, where recent guidelines have moved away from TKI monotherapy in favor of ICI-based combinations.This is the first study to comprehensively incorporate both upfront and deferred CN and compare both with ICI therapy, redefining the role and timing of surgeries in mRCC.Because oncologic surgery can effectively control cancer by removing tumor cells [20], it should be considered as a treatment option for mRCC in selected patients, weighing the benefits and risks tailored to each patient.Moreover, CN may reduce the cost of ICI therapy, allowing for therapeutic holidays [19].As patient selection is critical for expanding the role of CN in the contemporary IO era [21], the objective of this study is to develop biomarkers for patient selection for CN by analyzing gene mutation profiles and microbiomes.Due to the small number of study population, there could be some difficulties in drawing conclusions for discovery of biomarkers.Therefore, we will first achieve our primary endpoint, OS, and will expand the study for other analysis.Furthermore, the decision to perform CN should be discussed by a multidisciplinary team and clearly explained to the patients during shared decision-making sessions.
This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov on March 3, 2023.Patient accrual began in December 2022.Follow-up will be performed for at least 5 years or until death.

Trial status
Recruitment of participants started in July 2023 and will be completed in December 2027.The manuscript reports protocol version 1.0 (January 2, 2023).

Table 1
Clinical and pathological data BMI body mass index, BSA body surface area, CDC Clavien-Dindo classification, CTCAE Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, EBL estimated blood loss, IMDC International mRCC Database Consortium, ISUP International Society of Urologic Pathologists, KPS Karnofsky Performance Status, OR operating room, RECIST Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumors

Table 2
Study schedule of visits, and sampling of upfront cytoreductive nephrectomy group (Group A)

Table 3
Study schedule of visits, and sampling of deferred cytoreductive nephrectomy group (Group B)

Table 4
Study schedule of visits, and sampling of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy group (Group C)