Inhibition of iNOS as a novel effective targeted therapy against triple-negative breast cancer

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive form of breast cancer with no effective targeted therapy. Inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) is associated with poor survival in patients with breast cancer by increasing tumor aggressiveness. This work aimed to investigate the potential of iNOS inhibitors as a targeted therapy for TNBC. We hypothesized that inhibition of endogenous iNOS would decrease TNBC aggressiveness by reducing tumor initiation and metastasis through modulation of epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT)-inducing factors. iNOS protein levels were determined in 83 human TNBC tissues and correlated with clinical outcome. Proliferation, mammosphere-forming efficiency, migration, and EMT transcription factors were assessed in vitro after iNOS inhibition. Endogenous iNOS targeting was evaluated as a potential therapy in TNBC mouse models. High endogenous iNOS expression was associated with worse prognosis in patients with TNBC by gene expression as well as immunohistochemical analysis. Selective iNOS (1400 W) and pan-NOS (L-NMMA and L-NAME) inhibitors diminished cell proliferation, cancer stem cell self-renewal, and cell migration in vitro, together with inhibition of EMT transcription factors (Snail, Slug, Twist1, and Zeb1). Impairment of hypoxia-inducible factor 1α, endoplasmic reticulum stress (IRE1α/XBP1), and the crosstalk between activating transcription factor 3/activating transcription factor 4 and transforming growth factor β was observed. iNOS inhibition significantly reduced tumor growth, the number of lung metastases, tumor initiation, and self-renewal. Considering the effectiveness of L-NMMA in decreasing tumor growth and enhancing survival rate in TNBC, we propose a targeted therapeutic clinical trial by re-purposing the pan-NOS inhibitor L-NMMA, which has been extensively investigated for cardiogenic shock as an anti-cancer therapeutic.


Introduction
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive and lethal form of cancer that lacks estrogen receptor alpha (ERα), progesterone, and human epidermal growth factor receptors with no approved targeted therapeutic options. Despite numerous advances, treatment resistance and metastasis are the main causes of death in patients with TNBC. Resistance to conventional treatment and onset of metastases may arise from a subpopulation of cancer stem cells (CSCs) with self-renewal and tumorinitiating capacities [1,2]. Thus, combinatorial treatments with conventional chemotherapy and anti-CSC therapies would be necessary to reduce tumor burden, recurrence, and metastasis to distant organs [3,4].

Oncomine gene expression data analysis
Relative levels of NOS2 mRNA expression in human TNBC were investigated by Oncomine Cancer Microarray database analysis [16] of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database (n = 593). Patient survival analysis of two different gene expression data sets was obtained [17,18].
For mammosphere (MS) formation (MSFE), cells were cultured for 96 hours under treatment in 0.5% methylcellulose and MammoCult basal medium (StemCell Technologies, Vancouver, BC, Canada) supplemented with 10% proliferation supplements, 4 μg/mL heparin, and 0.48 μg/mL hydrocortisone. Primary MSs were scanned and counted with GelCount (Oxford Optronix, Abingdon, UK). Secondary MSs were grown in the absence of treatment. For the mouse model of lung metastasis, MDA-MB-231 cells were transfected with a luciferase/ GFP-based dual-reporter plasmid and stable clones (MDA-MB-231 L/G) selected with blasticidin (InvivoGen, San Diego, CA, USA).

Cell proliferation assay
Proliferation of SUM159 and MDA-MB-231 was determined by adding premixed WST-1 reagent (Clontech, Mountain View, CA, USA). For transient knockdown in SUM159 and MDA-MB-231 cells (500 cells per well), proliferation was determined after 72 hours of transfection.

Wound healing assay
Confluent cells were treated in starvation conditions (1% serum) for 72 hours. Medium was changed by regular growth medium in the presence of inhibitors for 24 hours more. For transient knockdown, cells were transfected for 72 hours in growth media. A 'wound' was then created in the cell monolayer with a 100-μL pipette tip. Images were taken at 0 and 14 hours. Data were replicated in three independent experiments.

RNA interference experiments
SUM159 and MDA-MB-231 cells were transiently transfected with Scrambled siRNA, siRNA1, or siRNA2 (100 nM) (Silencer Select; Ambion, Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY 14072 USA) for 96 hours using Lipofectamine RNAiMAX (Invitrogen, Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY 14072 USA) in accordance with the instructions of the manufacturer. GIPZ lentiviral NOS2 (shRNA1 -V3LHS_360691) and empty vector shRNAs were purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific. MDA-MB-231 cells were transduced with lentiviral particles and selected with puromycin. Cells were then harvested and plated for immunocytochemistry of iNOS.

Nitric oxide production
Cells were treated with L-NMMA or 1400 W for 24 hours in phenol red-and serum-free DMEM. Aliquots of cell culture supernatant were taken at 0, 0.5, 2, 6, and 24 hours for total NO production with the nitrate/nitrite fluorometric assay kit (Cayman Chemical) in accordance with the instructions of the manufacturer.
MS formation and limiting dilution assay (LDA) were assayed as previously described [4]. All animal procedures and experimental protocols were approved by the Houston Methodist Research Institute Animal Care and Use Review Office that ensured adherence to the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.

Metabolite profiling by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry
Xenograft tissue as well as plasma samples were prepared as previously described [19]. L-NMMA (200 mg/kg) was orally administered by gavage to female SCID Beige mice (n = 5). Blood was drawn before (baseline, 0 hours) and after (0.5, 2, 12, and 24 hours) L-NMMA administration. Ratiometric quantification of methylarginine (L-NMMA) and citrulline was determined as ion abundance levels in plasma and tumor tissue [19].

Blood pressure
Blood pressure (BP) was measured in 15 female SCID Beige mice for 3 days (basal BP) and subsequently treated with one cycle of the clinically relevant dose regimen (n = 5 per group). The average daily BP was determined by averaging the last 10 of 20 BP measurements for the last three consecutive days of the cycle treatment using a computerized tail cuff monitor (BP-2000 Series II; Visitech Systems, Napa Place, Apex, NC, USA).

Statistical analysis
All data were analyzed by using GraphPad Prism (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA). Data are presented as mean ± standard error of the mean. Statistical significance between two groups was analyzed by two-tailed Student's t test. Experiments with more than three groups were analyzed with one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Bonferroni's post hoc test. Statistical analysis of tumor volume was assessed by twoway ANOVA and Bonferroni's post hoc test. Fisher's exact test was used to determine significant differences in LDA. Survival proportions were assessed by using a Kaplan-Meier method and further analyzed with either Wilcoxon or log-rank test. Proliferation, MSFE, migration index, and Ki67 staining are normalized to the vehicle group (100%). A P value of less than 0.05 was considered significant.

Enhanced iNOS expression correlates with poor patient survival in invasive TNBC
iNOS has been described to be mediator of metastasis in different cancer types [20,21]. Elevated iNOS expression has been linked to poor survival in patients with ERα-negative breast cancer [7]. We hypothesized that enhanced iNOS expression in TNBC correlates with poor patient survival and metastases. Oncomine Cancer Microarray database analysis of NOS2 expression in TCGA breast database showed higher NOS2 expression in invasive TNBC (n = 46) versus non-TNBC (n = 250) (fold change 1.425, P = 3.85 × 10 −5 ) ( Figure 1A). Patient survival analysis demonstrated a correlation between increased NOS2 expression and worse survival at 5 years in patients with invasive ductal breast carcinoma (n = 79) (fold change 1.275, P = 0.037) ( Figure 1B). We further examined whether NOS2 expression correlates with worse survival in two additional databases of TNBC. Analysis of Van de Vijver (n = 69 samples) [17] and Curtis (n = 260 samples) [18] databases confirmed that high NOS2 expression was associated with poor survival in patients with TNBC ( Figure 1C and D).
This stratification was used to analyze the correlation of iNOS expression and patient survival by using the Kaplan-Meier analysis. We confirmed that enhanced iNOS protein levels were associated with worse patient survival when compared with low iNOS expression (P = 0.05) ( Figure 1F). These results demonstrate that increased iNOS by mRNA and protein expression in invasive TNBC is associated with poor patient survival.
Inhibition of iNOS decreases cell proliferation, migration, and mammosphere formation of TNBC cells High concentrations of 1400 W (1, 2, and 4 mM) significantly decreased proliferation in both cell lines (Figure 2A). Similar results were observed for L-NAME (Additional file 1: Figure S1A). L-NMMA at the highest concentration (4 mM) showed anti-proliferative activity in both cell lines ( Figure 2B). Resistance to treatment and metastasis may arise from a subpopulation of CSCs within a heterogeneous primary cancer [22,23]. iNOS inhibition decreased primary MSs in both cell lines ( Figure 2C; Additional file 1: Figure S1B; Additional file 2: Figure S2A; and Additional file 3: Figure S3A). We found reduced secondary MS in both cell lines for all the inhibitors tested ( Figure 2D; Additional file 1: Figure S1C; Additional file 2: Figures S2B; and Additional file 3: Figure S3B). We show enhanced iNOS expression in invasive TNBC ( Figure 1A); we then investigated the role of iNOS in cell migration. Selective iNOS inhibition with 1400 W caused a marked dose-dependent decrease in migration in both cell lines ( Figure 2E and Additional file 1: Figure S1D). L-NMMAtreated cells showed reduction in migration capacity ( Figure 2F and Additional file 1: Figure S1E). Similar results were found for L-NAME (Additional file 4: Figure S4A). These results were further confirmed in siRNA-mediated iNOS (NOS2) knockdown MDA-MB-231 ( Figure 3A-C) and SUM159 cells (Additional file 5: Figure S5A, B, and C). Collectively, the results indicate that basal levels of iNOS have a major role in CSC self-renewal and migrating properties of TNBC cell lines and a less pronounced effect on proliferation.
Suppression of endogenous iNOS could impair EMT and cell migration by impairing HIF1α and the endoplasmic reticulum stress/TGFβ/AFT4/ATF3 crosstalk EMT is evoked during tumor invasion and metastasis [3,24]. We examined the impact on NOS isoforms (iNOS, eNOS, and nNOS) after either selective or pan-inhibition ( Figure 3D and Additional file 4: Figure S4B, C, and F). Selective iNOS blockade with 1400 W caused a reduction in protein levels of the EMT transcription factors Snail, Slug, and Twist1 ( Figure 3D and Additional file 4: Figure S4D). Zeb1 protein levels were decreased at millimolar concentrations ( Figure 3D). Though less consistent, similar results were found for the pan-NOS inhibitors (Additional file 4: Figure S4E and F). iNOS knockdown with siRNA correlated with a decrease of Zeb1 and Twist1 protein levels in both cell lines ( Figure 3E). Overall, these data suggest that selective iNOS inhibition efficiently decreases migration of TNBC cell lines, and this is consistently correlated with a decrease of EMT transcription factors.
Different pathways are responsible for inducing EMT and metastasis of tumor cells; among them, NO is a common denominator of HIF1α and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress [25][26][27]. Our findings indicate that selective iNOS inhibition resulted in a dose-dependent decrease in hypoxia (HIF1α) ( Figure 3F and Additional file 4: Figure S4G) and the ER stress markers IRE1α/splicedXBP1 ( Figure 3F and Additional file 5: Figure S5E) and ATF4 (activating transcription factor 4) in both cell lines (splicedXBP1 was not detected in SUM159 cells; data not shown) ( Figure 3F). Functional protein-protein interaction analysis unveiled a link between iNOS and TGFβ1 (Additional file 5: Figure S5D). We confirmed that 1400 W is able to inhibit transforming growth factor β (TGFβ) signaling in the absence ( Figure 3G) and presence of recombinant TGFβ1 (Additional file 5: Figure S5F) through an undetermined mechanism. Additional protein-protein interaction analyses showed an interaction between ATF4 and ATF3 (activating transcription factor 3) (Additional file 5: Figure S5D), both activating transcription factors that interact with TGFβ [28,29]. We confirmed the crosstalk between ER stress through ATF4/ATF3 and TGFβ (Additional file 5: Figure S5G); similarly, recombinant TGFβ1 induced the PERK/eIF2α/ ATF4/ATF3 axis ( Figure 3H). Our results show that co-treatment of the iNOS inhibitor 1400 W and recombinant TGFβ1 (pretreatment for 7 days) for 24 hours was able to inhibit the stimulation of ATF4 and ATF3 protein levels by TGFβ1 independently of the PERK/eIF2α pathway. This result was further confirmed in siRNAmediated iNOS knockdown cells ( Figure 3I). Overall, our data demonstrate that iNOS inhibition could impair EMT and tumor cell migration by impairing ER stress (IRE1α/XBP1) and the crosstalk between ATF4, ATF3, and TGFβ.
iNOS inhibition reduces tumor growth and tumor-initiating capacity and prevents lung metastases in mouse models of TNBC Considering our in vitro data, we next investigated whether L-NAME was able to prevent tumor initiation and metastasis of MDA-MB-231 L/G cells in mice. L-NAME significantly reduced tumor growth (P = 0.001) ( Figure 4A) as well as primary MS ( Figure 4B). Additionally, tumorinitiating capacity of CSCs was assessed with LDA. All of the animals of the vehicle group developed tumors, but treatment with L-NAME yielded 3/5 tumors at 1.5 weeks with 5 × 10 5 cells. The same results were observed in the vehicle group at 2.5 weeks with 1 × 10 5 cells compared with the L-NAME-treated group (0/5 tumors) (P <0.05) ( Figure 4D). Ex vivo imaging of lungs in the presence of luciferin showed higher fluorescence in the vehicle group compared with the L-NAME group ( Figure 4C). These results suggest that iNOS inhibition with daily L-NAME may prevent metastasis to lungs in a TNBC mouse model.
To translate our results into future clinical trials, we used the pan-NOS inhibitor L-NMMA for further study. This is the first report using this drug re-purposed for this indication, with a paucity of data on the effective preclinical dose as an anti-cancer therapeutic. Thus, daily injections of 80 mg/kg L-NMMA were first given to SUM159 xenograft-bearing mice alone or in combination with docetaxel. After 10 days, no differential effect was observed between groups, and the daily dose was increased to 200 mg/kg. The tumor growth was efficiently blocked by L-NMMA administered alone or in combination with docetaxel (Additional file 6: Figure S6A). Higher proliferating rate (Ki67) in the vehicle and chemotherapy groups compared with the L-NMMA and combination groups (Additional file 6: Figure S6B and C) was observed. L-NMMA efficiently blocked the docetaxelenhanced MSFE (Additional file 6: Figure S6D). LDA showed that the docetaxel and combination groups exhibited 12/12 and 6/12 tumors, respectively, at 7 weeks with 5 × 10 4 cells. At week 9, we observed significant reduction in tumor-initiating capacity as different groups with 2 × 10 4 cells yielded 3/12 and 0/12 tumors in docetaxel  and combination, respectively (P <0.05) (Additional file 6: Figure S6E).
Similarly, docetaxel and L-NMMA (200 mg/kg, daily) were given to MDA-MB-231 xenograft-bearing mice. We found reduced tumor growth in the L-NMMA group compared with vehicle, but there was no change between the docetaxel and combination groups ( Figure 5A). These results were further correlated with lower proliferation rate (Ki67) in the L-NMMA and combination groups ( Figure 5B and C). Additionally, higher apoptosis levels in docetaxel-treated xenografts were found; these results might offset the high proliferation rate relative to the combination group ( Figure 5D). A decrease in MS formation was seen for both L-NMMA and combination compared with vehicle and chemotherapy alone ( Figure 5E). LDA showed that the vehicle-treated and docetaxel-treated groups presented 12/12 and 8/12 tumors, respectively, with a significant decrease in L-NMMA-treated (1/12) and combination-treated (4/12) xenografts at 5 weeks with 5 × 10 4 cells. After 6 weeks, a decrease in both the L-NMMA and combination groups (3/12 and 5/12, respectively) compared with the vehicle and docetaxel groups (6/12 and 8/12, respectively) was observed (P <0.05) ( Figure 5F). Our results in the MDA-MB-231 xenograft model do not show additional benefit over chemotherapy in terms of tumor volume; however, it is clear that the benefits of L-NMMA lie in the ability of this inhibitor to reduce self-renewal and tumor initiation capacities of CSCs.
Our investigations demonstrate that L-NMMA plasma levels are cleared rapidly (Additional file 7: Figure S7A), whereas it accumulates in the tumor tissue (Additional file 7: Figure S7B) and inhibits the conversion of L-arginine to L-citrulline and NO by iNOS (Additional file 7: Figure S7C) 24 hours after completion of treatment. This inhibition led to a decrease in total NO production as seen in SUM159 cells (Additional file 7: Figure S7D). Overall, these results demonstrate that in vivo iNOS inhibition with L-NMMA decreased tumor growth, cell proliferation, and tumorinitiating capacity of CSCs, together with a significant reduction in lung metastases.

Efficient dose regimen of L-NMMA and docetaxel with potential clinical application
Clinically, L-NMMA causes acute BP elevation through inhibition of constitutive eNOS [30]. Here, we propose a regimen with an attenuated duration of L-NMMA, at a dose comparable to that previously described clinically [31], together with the anti-hypertensive amlodipine and docetaxel. Oral L-NMMA significantly increased the mean systolic pressure compared with basal levels in mice, and this elevation was efficiently reversed by amlodipine ( Figure 6A). This elevation in BP was transient and disappeared 24 hours after the last injection of L-NMMA ( Figure 6B).
The combination of L-NMMA, amlodipine, and docetaxel was able to decrease tumor growth in an MDA-MB-231 orthotopic model ( Figure 6C). This dose regimen also improved survival in comparison with the docetaxeltreated group (P = 0.0001) ( Figure 6D). Similar results were found in SUM159 xenografts ( Figure 6E). We tested the effect of amlodipine on tumor volume in MDA-MB-231 tumor-bearing mice (n = 5 per group). A significant reduction in tumor volume was observed in docetaxel + amlodipine + L-NMMA compared with docetaxel (P <0.001), docetaxel + amlodipine (P <0.01), and docetaxel + L-NMMA (P <0.05) ( Figure 6F). Overall, these data show that the dose regimen proposed herein is effective in reducing tumor growth and may result in improved survival.

Discussion
TNBC is an extremely aggressive and lethal form of cancer lacking effective targeted therapies. Patients with TNBC show higher risk of metastasis and tumor relapse [1,2]. We have recently described two novel cancer genes (RPL39 and MLF2) that are important for tumor initiation and metastasis and are regulated by the NO signaling pathway [32]. iNOS predicts for worse survival in patients with basal-like ER-negative breast cancer and has been suggested to increase tumor aggressiveness by modulating CSCs as well as the metastatic propensity of  cells [7]. This is the first report demonstrating that iNOS inhibition decreases tumorigenicity of TNBC cells by affecting cell proliferation, CSC self-renewal, and migration. Our in vivo experiments demonstrate the efficacy of a small-molecule iNOS inhibitor L-NMMA as a potential novel targeted therapy in patients with TNBC with immediate translation into human clinical trials.
We report that NOS2 is commonly increased in invasive TNBC and is associated with poor survival of patients with invasive breast carcinoma. We provide additional data that high iNOS protein levels by immunohistochemistry in samples of patients with TNBC also correlate with worse outcome, consistent with earlier reports in ERα-negative [8] and invasive breast carcinoma [33]. Kaplan-Meier analysis of the Van de Vijver and Curtis databases as well as of the human TNBC patient samples strongly indicate that high iNOS expression is associated with poor overall survival in patients with TNBC. These observations establish that increased iNOS expression may be a marker of poor prognosis in patients with breast cancer [6][7][8][9].
iNOS expression has been correlated with increased tumor grade and aggressiveness of breast cancer cells [7,9]. Here, we describe the effect of iNOS on CSC selfrenewal, tumor initiation, and the migrating capacity of TNBC cells. The anti-tumor activity of iNOS inhibitors has been previously reported in oral [34], glioblastoma [13], and breast cancer [35][36][37][38] and is consistent with our findings. Increased iNOS expression has been described to contribute to resistance to conventional treatment by promoting tumor initiation in glioblastoma cells [13,38]. Additionally, iNOS may influence CSC self-renewal by modulating CD44 and c-Myc in ERα-negative breast cancer [7]. We demonstrate for the first time that iNOS inhibition decreased CSC self-renewal and tumor initiation in TNBC.
NO may either promote or inhibit metastatic events depending on endogenous levels [5]. The role of NOS inhibitors on metastasis has been previously studied, but the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. An early study demonstrated that the pan-NOS inhibitor L-NAME may decrease tumor growth and lung metastasis in a murine breast cancer model (EMT-6 cells) [39]. Similarly, L-NAME inhibited the invasive and migrating potential of two metastatic mammary cell lines (C3L5 and C10) [40].
In a study with the metastatic human adenocarcinoma HRT-18 cells, the invasiveness was substantially decreased by daily treatment with 500 μM of the selective iNOS inhibitor 1400 W [41]. More recently, 1400 W was shown to markedly inhibit spontaneous lung metastasis in a mouse model of adenoid cystic carcinoma of the oral cavity [34]. Our present results demonstrate that iNOS inhibition decreases cell migration and lung metastases in TNBC. It has been suggested that NO and iNOS may lead to early metastasis by inducing IL-8 [7] and the CXC chemokine receptor 4 [42]. CSCs display mesenchymal features [2], resulting in increased cell migration and metastasis. iNOS inhibition decreased CSC self-renewal and tumor initiation, thus indicating that inhibitors against this pathway could reverse the transition of tumor cells to a more mesenchymal-like phenotype. Consistent with the effect on cell migration, selective iNOS inhibition and NOS2 knockdown decreased transcription factors driving EMT in all of the TNBC cell lines tested. EMT may be promoted by different signal transduction pathways like TGFβ, Wnt/β-catenin, Notch, and Hedgehog and multiple growth factors. EMT transcription factors (Snail, Slug, Twist1, or Zeb1) are activated by diverse intermediate effectors like c-Myc, Ets, HIF1α, or NFκB [43]. Additionally, ER stress has been linked to EMT in thyroid, alveolar epithelial, and human renal proximal tubule cells through activation of PERK, XBP1, or Grp78 [27,[44][45][46]. Interestingly, among these disparate signaling networks, iNOS is the common denominator between HIF1α and ER stress [25][26][27]. Inhibition of endogenous iNOS-derived NO production was able to reduce HIF1α stabilization and protein levels in colon carcinoma cells [47]. Transcription factors Twist1, Snail, Slug, and Zeb1, among others, are directly or indirectly influenced by HIF1α [26]. Additionally, hypoxia induces ER stress and unfolded protein response and was recently linked to migration and sphere formation in breast cancer cells by activation of the PERK/ATF4/LAMP3 arm under hypoxic conditions [48]. Our results suggest that iNOS inhibition correlates with an impairment of TGFβ signaling via the ER stress ATF4/ATF3 axis. It is known that TGFβ stimulates ATF4 protein levels to suppress differentiation in calvarial osteoblasts [29]. Certain conditions such as ER stress through the PERK/eIF2α axis may activate ATF4, which in turn induces ATF3 Results were normalized to vehicle. For proliferation and apoptosis, 1,000 cells were counted from 10 different fields, and the percentage was determined. Data are presented as mean ± standard error of the mean. *P <0.05, **P <0.01, ***P <0.001, ****P <0.0001. L-NMMA, N G -monomethyl-L-arginine; MSFE, mammosphere-forming efficiency. transcription [49], whereas ATF3 itself is an activating transcription factor that enhances TGFβ, MS formation, and EMT in cooperation with Twist1 [28].
To determine a safe and effective regimen with clinical applicability was the main challenge of these preclinical studies. L-NMMA is a pan-NOS inhibitor that has been extensively studied in several clinical trials of circulatory shock [30]. In the cardiogenic shock trial, L-NMMA was safe and had few adverse events other than transient reversible hypertension [31]. In normotensive patients, L-NMMA was administered to patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma prior to infusion of IL-2 [31]. Doses of 3 and 6 mg/kg did not induce clinically apparent side effects, and BP remained unchanged. At a dose level of 12 mg/kg, patients experienced an increase in systolic BP up to 25 mm Hg, without any clinical symptoms, which normalized rapidly on stopping the L-NMMA infusion. The dose rate in the present study was chosen, with modifications, on the basis of a previous clinical trial in patients with septic shock [31]. Our results demonstrate that tumor growth can be restrained by an attenuated regimen of 5 days of L-NMMA after chemotherapy, given together with amlodipine. López et al. [50] carried out a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study of L-NMMA in patients with septic shock up to a maximum of 14 days. The regimen followed consisted of an initial dose of 2.5 mg/kg per hour and then was adjusted at different rates (0.5, 1, 2.5, 5, 7.5, 10, 15, and 20 mg/kg per hour). The current proposed dose regimen to be clinically tested as a novel anti-cancer therapeutic is at much lower total doses, which have been described [50]. cancer cells isolated from tumor tissue. (E) Tumor-initiating capacity of tumor cells assayed by the limiting dilution method. Results were normalized to vehicle. Data are presented as mean ± standard error of the mean. *P <0.05, **P <0.01, ***P <0.001, ****P <0.0001. L-NMMA, N G -monomethyl-L-arginine. Competing interests SSG is a partner in Arginox Pharmaceuticals. The other authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors' contributions SG-P performed and designed the majority of the experiments, analyzed the data, and drafted the manuscript. YL assisted in the generation of the metastatic model of MDA-MB-231 L/G xenografts and the acquisition of bioluminescence data. MLG assisted with the in vitro data acquisition and Western blot experiments with L-NMMA. EB and DSC assisted in the treatments and measurement of tumor volume in the animal experiments. WQ performed the immunohistochemistry in TMA of xenograft and patient tissues. TP and AAR managed patients and collected the clinical outcome and patient samples. JC assisted with evaluating and scoring the levels of iNOS in TMAs from xenograft and patient tissues. HLW performed the biostatistics and computational analysis to correlate the iNOS levels in the patients' TMA and the clinical outcome. HZ performed the analysis of NOS2 mRNA expression in human TNBC with the Oncomine Cancer Microarray database of TCGA. MDL and BD assisted in the statistical analysis, interpretation of the clinical data, and review of the manuscript. SSG gave financial support, performed the metabolite profiling by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, provided L-NMMA, and assisted in the interpretation of the animal data and revision of the manuscript. JCC conceived the project, supervised the study, provided financial support, and contributed to the writing and critical reviewing of the final manuscript. All authors have made substantial contributions to the design of experiments, data analysis, and drafting of the manuscript. All authors have reviewed and approved the final version of this manuscript and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work presented herein.