Skip to main content
Download PDF

Management of acute metabolic acidosis in the ICU: sodium bicarbonate and renal replacement therapy

Critical Care volume 25, Article number: 314 (2021) Cite this article

A Correction to this article was published on 05 April 2024

This article has been updated

Abstract

This article is one of ten reviews selected from the Annual Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine 2021. Other selected articles can be found online at https://www.biomedcentral.com/collections/annualupdate2021. Further information about the Annual Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine is available from https://link.springer.com/bookseries/8901.

Introduction

Metabolic acidosis is a process caused by an increase in weak acids or a decrease in strong ion difference (SID) [1]. Serum proteins, albumin, and inorganic phosphate are considered as weak acids. Strong ions, such as Na+, K+, Ca2+, Mg2+, and Cl−, exist at a fully ionized status in body fluids. SID is the presence of an excess of strong cations over strong anions, and the normal value in plasma is 42 mEq/l. The method to quantify metabolic acidosis using SID and weak acids was introduced by Stewart in the 1980s and still creates debate in its clinical application [2]. Plasma base excess is widely used to identify a metabolic component of acidosis in clinical practice. The base excess approach was shown to be equivalent to Stewart’s SID approach in quantifying acid–base status in critically ill patients [3].

Metabolic acidosis is classified into acute and chronic. Although it is not clearly defined, acute metabolic acidosis occurs within a few days. Chronic acidosis is a condition that lasts for weeks or even years [4]. In this chapter, we focus on acute metabolic acidosis in intensive care unit (ICU) patients and provide an update from recently published clinical studies.

Epidemiology of metabolic acidosis in the ICU

Acute metabolic acidosis is well-recognized in the ICU. However, epidemiological data are scarce, which has limited our understanding of the approach to metabolic acidosis until recently.

A retrospective observational study using a large bi-national ICU database in Australia and New Zealand examined the incidence, characteristics, and outcomes of patients with various definitions of metabolic acidosis [5]. Severe metabolic acidosis was defined as a pH ≤ 7.20, PaCO2 ≤ 45 mmHg, HCO3−  ≤ 20 mmol/l, and total sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score ≥ 4 or lactate ≥ 2 mmol/l [6] and occurred in 1.5% of the patients in the ICU. The ICU and hospital mortality rates of these patients were 43.5% and 48.3%, respectively. Moderate or severe metabolic acidosis was defined as pH < 7.30, base excess < −4 mmol/l and PaCO2 ≤ 45 mmHg, and occurred in 8.4% of ICU patients. The ICU and hospital mortality rates were 17.3% and 21.5%, respectively [5]. The mortality of patients with moderate or severe metabolic acidosis was higher than that of patients with sepsis observed in the same database [7], suggesting the clinical relevance of improving care for patients with metabolic acidosis.

A French multicenter prospective study described the incidence of severe acidemia in five ICUs [8]. Severe acidemia was defined as pH < 7.2, including respiratory acidosis, metabolic acidosis, and mixed acidosis. This severe acidosis occurred in 8% (200/2550) of the patients within 24 h of ICU admission. After excluding patients with diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA), which is adjudicated to be an entity with a low risk of death, and patients with respiratory acidosis, ICU mortality of patients with metabolic or mixed severe acidosis was as high as 57% (89/155) [8].

A recently published international observational study conducted in 18 ICUs in Australia, Japan, and Taiwan reported that 14% (1292/9437) of critically ill patients had moderate or severe metabolic acidosis [9]. The median incidence of metabolic acidosis at a study ICU was 172.5 patients/year, suggesting that the management of metabolic acidosis is a relevant issue in patient care in the ICU.

Common types of metabolic acidosis in the ICU

The causes of acute metabolic acidosis are diverse in critically ill patients. DKA, lactic acidosis, and hyperchloremic acidosis are responsible for most cases of severe metabolic acidosis cases due to a decreased SID [10].

DKA is a medical emergency in patients with diabetes mellitus as a result of insulin deficiency. The hepatic metabolism of fatty acids produces beta- hydroxybutyrate and acetoacetate, strong anions in the human body. As hyperglycemia induces osmotic diuresis, patients with DKA have a markedly reduced extracellular fluid volume. The available evidence was summarized in a review that revealed the paucity of sufficient data on clinical impact [11]. To date, a comprehensive epidemiological study on DKA investigating its epidemiology and clinical outcomes is still lacking.

Lactate is a strong anion in the human body as more than 99% of lactate is ionized. Lactic acidosis is observed in cardiogenic or hypovolemic shock, severe heart failure, severe trauma, and sepsis [8], with high mortality rates, ranging from 30 to 88% depending on the definition used [12, 13]. The mortality of patients with lactic acidosis was reportedly the highest (56%) amongst patients with metabolic acidosis defined by a SBE (standard base excess) < -2 mEq/l [14].

Recently, hyperchloremic acidosis caused by intravenous fluid products has become widely known and is reported in 19% to 45% of patients in the ICU [14, 15]. Table 1 shows the electrolytes and SIDs of intravenous fluid products commonly used in the ICU. Theoretically, acidosis occurs when intravenous fluid products with a SID lower than that of the patient’s plasma are administered. Balanced crystalloids, i.e., Ringer’s acetate, Ringer’s lactate, and Plasmalyte, contain acetate, lactate, or gluconate to replace chloride. Those strong anions do not contribute to SID as they are metabolized by the liver faster than renal chloride excretion.

Table 1 Electrolytes and strong ion difference (SID) of fluid products commonly used in the intensive care unit (ICU)
Full size table

Why metabolic acidosis matters

Metabolic acidosis can have various adverse effects, but the most critical consequence is its effect on the cardiovascular system. Recognition of this effect dates back to the 1960s when a study reported reduced cardiac contractility at pH < 7.1 when lactic acid was administered to dogs [16]. Animal experiments were also performed on dogs given lactic acid and hydrochloric acid to produce lactic acidosis and hyperchloremic acidosis. The dogs were given epinephrine, norepinephrine, and dobutamine to counteract the shock status. The cardiac index decreased when epinephrine or norepinephrine was administered; however, dobutamine administration increased the cardiac index. This result suggested that acidosis decreased the catecholamine reactivity to norepinephrine or epinephrine [17]. Pedoto et al. reported that when hydrochloric acid was administered to rats to mimic hyperchloremic acidosis, nitric oxide (NO) production increased, provoking vasodilation, and resulting in reduced systemic blood pressure [18]. Fatal arrhythmias induced by acidosis have also been reported in an experimental model [19]. However, clinical studies in humans have not yet demonstrated a causal relationship between metabolic acidosis and cardiovascular dysfunction [20,21,22].

How we manage metabolic acidosis in the ICU

Metabolic acidosis in critically ill patients is not a single disease but a syndrome driven by various underlying conditions. As such, the basic principle is to treat the underlying cause of metabolic acidosis. Sodium bicarbonate may be administered if there is a concern for the suppressed cardiac function that metabolic acidosis may cause. The rationale for using sodium bicarbonate for metabolic acidosis is that the intravenous administration of a high SID solution would increase the pH, resulting in improved cardiac function.

The evidence on the biochemical effects of intravenous sodium bicarbonate in acute metabolic acidosis has been systematically reviewed [23]. The summary of 12 relevant studies showed that pH, serum bicarbonate, base excess, serum sodium, and PaCO2 increased during and after the intravenous administration of sodium bicarbonate [23]. By contrast, serum anion gap and potassium decreased. Some concern was raised about intracellular acidosis due to the back-diffusion of CO2 and decreased ionized calcium that might impair cardiac contraction. However, there was no consistent evidence from the literature review that sodium bicarbonate administration was associated with decreased ionized calcium or decreased cardiac output [20, 24].

The effects of sodium bicarbonate on clinically relevant outcomes should be investigated in RCTs. The systematic review [23] identified only two RCTs that have been conducted [5, 25]. Hoste et al. compared the effect of sodium bicarbonate and tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane, THAM, in 18 patients with mild metabolic acidosis [25]. The trial, published in 2005, did not report clinically important out-comes, perhaps because the trial was conducted as a pilot trial. THAM has not been explored for its effects since this trial and is rarely used in current clinical practice.

An important RCT investigating the effects of sodium bicarbonate for severe metabolic acidosis was published in 2018 [5]. The BICAR-ICU trial was conducted in 26 French ICUs and enrolled 389 patients with severe acidemia (pH ≤ 7.20, PaCO2 ≤ 45 mmHg, HCO3−  ≤ 20 mmol/l, and total SOFA score ≥ 4 or lactate ≥ 2 mmol/l). The trial excluded patients with DKA or chronic kidney disease (CKD). Patients were allocated to an intervention group receiving 4.2% sodium bicarbonate to maintain pH > 7.3 throughout the ICU stay or a control group with usual care. There was no difference in the primary outcome, which was a composite of death by day 28 and at least one organ failure at day 7, between the groups. However, treatment with sodium bicarbonate was associated with a reduced need for renal replacement therapy (RRT) in the ICU. Furthermore, in the pre-specified subgroup of patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) (AKIN score 2 or 3), sodium bicarbonate was associated with improved survival and reduced need for RRT [5].

In a retrospective, observational study using the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC)-III database, sodium bicarbonate administration was not associated with improved survival in patients with metabolic acidosis (pH < 7.3, HCO3−  < 20 mmol/l and PaCO2 < 50 mmHg) but was associated with improved survival in septic patients with stage 2 or 3 AKI and severe acidemia (pH < 7.2) [26].

A recent international observational study revealed that 18% of patients with moderate or severe metabolic acidosis receive sodium bicarbonate in current clinical practice [9]. However, the total amount of sodium bicarbonate given during the first 24 h of metabolic acidosis was 110 mmol, which was not adjusted for body weight or base excess. The study also reported that sodium bicarbonate administration was possibly associated with lower ICU mortality in acidotic patients with vasopressor dependency, albeit with a lack of statistical significance. Given that the rationale to use sodium bicarbonate would be to support cardiovascular function, this finding provides a sound basis for further investigation on the effect of sodium bicarbonate in patients with metabolic acidosis and on vasopressors.

Sodium bicarbonate for subtypes of metabolic acidosis

Administration of sodium bicarbonate has been considered for DKA not only because sodium bicarbonate reverses the acidotic status but because acidosis possibly contributes to insulin resistance [27]. However, a retrospective single center study from the USA reported that sodium bicarbonate administration in the emergency department was not associated with time to resolution of acidosis in patients with DKA with a pH < 7.0 [28]. There was also no difference in hospital length of stay [28]. A systematic review in 2011 found that sodium bicarbonate did not shorten the duration of acidosis, ketosis, or glycemic levels [11]. Furthermore, there was a high incidence of hypokalemia that required correction in patients who received sodium bicarbonate [11]. These findings imply that the beneficial effects of sodium bicarbonate administration for DKA might be limited. However, the systematic review by Chua et al. revealed a lack of rigorous randomized clinical trials that assessed patient-centered outcomes in these patients [11].

Sodium bicarbonate for lactic acidosis has been compared with saline in two small-scale randomized, crossover, single center trials [20, 21]. Cooper et al. reported that sodium bicarbonate administration increased pH and PCO2 with no change in blood pressure or cardiac output [20]. Similarly, Mathieu et al. found an increase in pH but no change in hemodynamic parameters, including cardiac index [21].

For cardiac arrest, several observational studies have reported an increase in the rate of return of spontaneous circulation in patients receiving sodium bicarbonate [29,30,31,32]. However, one study found that this treatment was associated with a worse survival rate and neurological outcomes to hospital discharge [33]. A pilot RCT showed no improvement in patient mortality [34], return of spontaneous circulation rate, or neurologically favorable status in treated patients [35]. At present, routine use of sodium bicarbonate is not recommended for cardiopulmonary resuscitation [36].

Renal replacement therapy for metabolic acidosis

There has been no clear consensus of clinical indications for RRT; however, severe acidosis is a commonly accepted indication. In RCTs on the timing of RRT that have been published over the past 5 years, i.e., the AKIKI trial, the IDEAL-ICU trial, and the STARRT-AKI trial, metabolic acidosis with severe acidemia was used as one of the absolute indications [37,38,39].

The AKIKI trial was a multicenter RCT in France, enrolling patients with stage 3 AKI, in which 67% of the patients had septic shock [37]. The trial compared early initiation of RRT in stage 3 AKI and delayed initiation with absolute indications. The absolute indications for RRT included severe acidemia with pH < 7.15, either metabolic acidosis or mixed acidosis. Of note, 21% of the trial participants in the control group received RRT for metabolic acidosis [37].

The IDEAL-ICU trial was another multicenter RCT conducted in France, enrolling patients with septic shock and stage 3 AKI [38]. The absolute indications for RRT included metabolic acidosis with pH < 7.15 and base deficit > 5 mEq/l or HCO3−  < 18 mEq/l. Among the patients who received RRT for the absolute indication, 13.4% met the metabolic acidosis criteria [38].

The STARRT-AKI trial was the largest international RCT, including 3019 patients from 15 countries [39]. The main aim of the trial was to assess whether an accelerated strategy to start RRT at stage 2 or 3 AKI would improve patient-centered outcomes compared with a delayed initiation with absolute indications. The absolute indications for RRT included severe acidemia and metabolic acidosis, defined as pH ≤ 7.2 or HCO3−  < 12 mmol/l. Of the patients treated with RRT, 16.6% met the criteria for severe metabolic acidosis [39].

From the STARRT-AKI trial and the BICAR-ICU trial, patients with stage 2 or 3 AKI should avoid immediate intervention with RRT and may benefit from sodium bicarbonate if severe metabolic acidosis is present despite appropriate treatment for underlying conditions.

Agenda for future research

Recent clinical research, including large RCTs, has provided new evidence and advanced our understanding of the management of metabolic acidosis. However, high-quality data from rigorous clinical research to guide standard practice are still lacking. Research priorities include the following:

  • The benefits and harms of sodium bicarbonate on cardiovascular function

  • Sodium bicarbonate not only for severe metabolic acidosis but for moderate metabolic acidosis

  • Sodium bicarbonate for severe metabolic acidosis with stage 2 or 3 AKI (BICARICU-2, Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT04010630, in progress).

Conclusion

We have reviewed the recent clinical data on epidemiology and management of metabolic acidosis. Metabolic acidosis is common in the ICU, and even moderate metabolic acidosis carries higher mortality than severe sepsis. Sodium bicarbonate or RRT is used occasionally to normalize acid–base imbalance due to metabolic acidosis in the ICU; however, high-quality evidence is still limited. Patients with severe metabolic acidosis and stage 2 or 3 AKI might be a possible target population for sodium bicarbonate administration. Further clinical trials are required to provide more robust information in a clinically relevant patient population.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Change history

References

  1. Stewart PA. How to understand acid–base: a quantitative acid–base primer for biology and medicine. Elsevier; 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Morris CG, Low J. Metabolic acidosis in the critically ill: part 1. Classification and pathophysiology. Anaesthesia. 2008;63:294–301.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Story DA, Morimatsu H, Bellomo R. Strong ions, weak acids and base excess: a simplified Fencl–Stewart approach to clinical acid–base disorders. Br J Anaesth. 2004;92:54–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kraut JA, Madias NE. Metabolic acidosis: pathophysiology, diagnosis and management. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2010;6:274–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mochizuki K, Fujii T, Paul E, Anstey M, Pilcher DV, Bellomo R. Early metabolic acidosis in critically ill patients: a binational multicentre study. Crit Care Resusc. 2021;23:67–75.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Jaber S, Paugam C, Futier E, Lefrant JY, Lasocki S, Lescot T, et al. Sodium bicarbonate therapy for patients with severe metabolic acidaemia in the intensive care unit (BICAR-ICU): a multicentre, open-label, randomized controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2018;392:31–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kaukonen K-M, Bailey M, Suzuki S, Pilcher D, Bellomo R. Mortality related to severe sepsis and septic shock among critically ill patients in Australia and New Zealand, 2000–2012. JAMA. 2014;311:1308–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Jung B, Rimmele T, Le Goff C, Chanques G, Corne P, Jonquet O, et al. Severe metabolic or mixed acidemia on intensive care unit admission: incidence, prognosis and administration of buffer therapy. A prospective, multiple-center study. Crit Care. 2011;15:R238.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Fujii T, Udy AA, Nichol A, Bellomo R, Deane AM, El-Khawas K, et al. Incidence and management of metabolic acidosis with sodium bicarbonate in the ICU: an international observational study. Crit Care. 2021;25:45.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Gabow PA, Kaehny WD, Fennessey PV, Goodman SI, Gross PA, Schrier RW. Diagnostic importance of an increased serum anion gap. N Engl J Med. 1980;303:854–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Chua HR, Schneider A, Bellomo R. Bicarbonate in diabetic ketoacidosis—a systematic review. Ann Intensive Care. 2011;1:23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fall PJ, Szerlip HM. Lactic acidosis: from sour milk to septic shock. J Intensive Care Med. 2005;20:255–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Luft D, Deichsel G, Schmülling RM, Stein W, Eggstein M. Definition of clinically relevant lactic acidosis in patients with internal diseases. Am J Clin Pathol. 1983;80:484–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gunnerson KJ, Saul M, He S, Kellum JA. Lactate versus non-lactate metabolic acidosis: a retrospective outcome evaluation of critically ill patients. Crit Care. 2006;10:R22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Brill SA, Stewart TR, Brundage SI, Schreiber MA. Base deficit does not predict mortality when secondary to hyperchloremic acidosis. Shock. 2002;17:459–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wildenthal K, Mierzwiak DS, Myers RW, Mitchell JH. Effects of acute lactic acidosis on left ventricular performance. Am J Phys. 1968;214:1352–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Huang YG, Wong KC, Yip WH, McJames SW, Pace NL. Cardiovascular responses to graded doses of three catecholamines during lactic and hydrochloric acidosis in dogs. Br J Anaesth. 1995;74:583–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Pedoto A, Caruso JE, Nandi J, Oler A, Hoffmann SP, Tassiopoulos AK, et al. Acidosis stimulates nitric oxide production and lung damage in rats. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999;159:397–402.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Orchard CH, Cingolani HE. Acidosis and arrhythmias in cardiac muscle. Cardiovasc Res. 1994;28:1312–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Cooper DJ, Walley KR, Wiggs BR, Russell JA. Bicarbonate does not improve hemodynamics in critically III patients who have lactic acidosis: a prospective, controlled clinical study. Ann Intern Med. 1990;112:492–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mathieu D, Neviere R, Billard V, Fleyfel M, Wattel F. Effects of bicarbonate therapy on hemodynamics and tissue oxygenation in patients with lactic acidosis: a prospective, controlled clinical study. Crit Care Med. 1991;19:1352–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Khazel AH, McLaughlin JS, Suddhimondala C, Atar S, Cowley RA. The effects of acidosis and alkalosis on cardiac output and peripheral resistance in humans. Am Surg. 1969;35:600–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Fujii T, Udy A, Licari E, Romero L, Bellomo R. Sodium bicarbonate therapy for critically ill patients with metabolic acidosis: a scoping and a systematic review. J Crit Care. 2019;51:184–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Mark NH, Leung JM, Arieff AI, Mangano DT. Safety of low-dose intraoperative bicarbonate therapy: a prospective, double-blind, randomized study. The study of perioperative ischemia (SPI) research group. Crit Care Med. 1993;21:659–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hoste EA, Colpaert K, Vanholder RC, Lameire NH, De Waele JJ, Blot SI, et al. Sodium bicarbonate versus THAM in ICU patients with mild metabolic acidosis. J Nephrol. 2005;18:303–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhang Z, Zhu C, Mo L, Hong Y. Effectiveness of sodium bicarbonate infusion on mortality in septic patients with metabolic acidosis. Intensive Care Med. 2018;44:1888–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Walker BG, Phear DN, Martin FI, Baird CW. Inhibition of insulin by acidosis. Lancet. 1963;2:964–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Duhon B, Attridge RL, Franco-Martinez AC, Maxwell PR, Hughes DW. Intravenous sodium bicarbonate therapy in severely acidotic diabetic ketoacidosis. Ann Pharmacother. 2013;47:970–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Weng YM, Wu S-H, Li WC, Kuo C-W, Chen SY, Chen JC. The effects of sodium bicarbonate during prolonged cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Am J Emerg Med. 2013;31:562–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kim J, Kim K, Park J, Jo YH, Lee JH, Hwang JE, et al. Sodium bicarbonate administration during ongoing resuscitation is associated with increased return of spontaneous circulation. Am J Emerg Med. 2016;34:225–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Wang C-H, Huang CH, Chang WT, Tsai MS, Yu PH, Wu YW, et al. The effects of calcium and sodium bicarbonate on severe hyperkalaemia during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a retrospective cohort study of adult in-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2016;98:105–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Bar-Joseph G, Abramson NS, Kelsey SF, Mashiach T, Craig MT, Safar P, et al. Improved resuscitation outcome in emergency medical systems with increased usage of sodium bicarbonate during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2005;49:6–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kawano T, Grunau B, Scheuermeyer FX, Gibo K, Dick W, Fordyce CB, et al. Prehospital sodium bicarbonate use could worsen long term survival with favorable neurological recovery among patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2017;119:63–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Vukmir RB, Katz L, Sodium Bicarbonate Study Group. Sodium bicarbonate improves out-come in prolonged prehospital cardiac arrest. Am J Emerg Med. 2006;24:156–61.

  35. Ahn S, Kim YJ, Sohn CH, Seo DW, Lim KS, Donnino MW, et al. Sodium bicarbonate on severe metabolic acidosis during prolonged cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled pilot study. J Thorac Dis. 2018;10:2295–302.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Panchal AR, Bartos JA, Cabañas JG, Donnino MW, Drennan IR, Hirsch KG, et al. Part 3: adult basic and advanced life support: 2020 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation. 2020;142:S366-468.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Gaudry S, Hajage D, Schortgen F, Martin-Lefevre L, Pons B, Boulet E, et al. Initiation strategies for renal-replacement therapy in the intensive care unit. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:122–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Barbar SD, Clere-Jehl R, Bourredjem A, Hernu R, Montini F, Bruyère R, et al. Timing of renal-replacement therapy in patients with acute kidney injury and sepsis. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:1431–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. STARRT-AKI Investigators, Canadian Critical Care Trials Group, Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Clinical Trials Group, United Kingdom Critical Care Research Group, Canadian Nephrology Trials Network, Irish Critical Care Trials Group, et al. Timing of initiation of renal-replacement therapy in acute kidney injury. N Engl J Med. 2020;383:240–51.

Download references

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

Publication costs were funded by The Jikei University Research Fund (2019_019SR to TF).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Intensive Care Unit, Jikei University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan

    Kosuke Yagi & Tomoko Fujii

  2. ANZIC-RC, Monash University School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

    Tomoko Fujii

Authors
  1. Kosuke Yagi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tomoko Fujii
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

KY and TF conceived the review article. KY wrote the manuscript with support from TF. TF is a guarantor of the article. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tomoko Fujii.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

None to declare.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original online version of this article was revised: The article did not contain a license text in the published version. The correct license text is updated.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yagi, K., Fujii, T. Management of acute metabolic acidosis in the ICU: sodium bicarbonate and renal replacement therapy. Crit Care 25, 314 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-021-03677-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-021-03677-4

Critical Care

ISSN: 1364-8535