Report of a patient with a de novo non-recurrent duplication of 17p11.2p12 and Yq11 deletion

Background The 17p11.2p12 locus is an unstable region that is predisposed to several known genomic disorders and non-recurrent rearrangements that yield varied and wide-ranging phenotypes. Nearly 1% of male newborns have deletions in the Y chromosome; these events primarily involve the heterochromatic region, but may extend to euchromatic Yq segments containing azoospermia factor regions. Case presentation We describe the occurrence of two independent chromosomal rearrangements that originated as de novo events in a single male patient: a 10.8-Mb duplication of 17p11.2p12 and a 14.7-Mb deletion of Yq11. This individual shares some clinical characteristics with previously described patients having one or the other of these rearrangements, including global developmental delay, short stature, hypotonia, delayed puberty, certain facial features and a generalized demyelinating sensory-motor polyneuropathy without clinical manifestation. Our patient also presents some features that were not previously described in relevant individuals, including camptodactyly, preauricular pits and hypertrichosis of the back and elbows. Conclusions To our knowledge, this is the first patient to be reported with independent de novo deletion/duplication events involving chromosomes 17 and Y. We discuss possible responsible mechanisms and address the phenotype, particularly in light of the clinical features that were not previously reported for patients bearing a duplication of 17p11.2p12 or a deletion of Yq11. We suggest that some of the previously reported patients with Yq11 deletion and clinical manifestations other than male infertility may have additional chromosomal imbalances that could be identified by chromosome microarray analysis, as illustrated by the present case. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s13039-019-0438-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

The genes located on the Y chromosome are mainly related to male gonadal determination and spermatogenesis. The euchromatic long arm includes the azoospermia factor (AZF) region. It has been estimated that structural abnormalities of the Y chromosome affect nearly of 1% of the newborn male population [6]; most involve duplication or deletion of Yq heterochromatin [7], and some could be considered normal variants [8].
To our knowledge, only two patients with concurrent de novo deletion/duplication events involving two chromosomes have been reported in the literature [9,10]; neither case involved both chromosomes 17 and Y, and no pathophysiological mechanism was proposed in either report. Here, we present the first case report of a patient bearing two non-recurrent de novo rearrangements involving a 10.8-Mb duplication of 17p11.2p12 and a 14.7-Mb deletion of Yq11. We show that each arose from the germline of a different parent, discuss possible responsible mechanisms, and address the phenotype, which includes certain clinical features that were not previously described for patients with either mutation alone. Moreover, we suggest that some of the previously reported patients with Yq11 deletion and clinical manifestations other than male infertility may have additional chromosomal imbalances that could be identified by chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA), as illustrated by the present case.

Case presentation
We describe a 15-year old boy who is the second child of healthy and non-consanguineous parents. At the time of pregnancy, his mother was 29 years old and his father was 36 years old. He has two healthy brothers and his family and gestational history are unremarkable. Perinatal attention was performed at 41 weeks of gestation after spontaneous vaginal delivery (birth weight, 3.200 kg; length, 51 cm; occipital-frontal circumference and APGAR, unknown). The parents did not remark upon any complication at birth. He was referred to our institute at 24 months of age due to the presence of developmental delay. Physical examination revealed that his weight was 10.200 kg (Z-3.09) and his height was 80 cm (Z-1.16). His head circumference was 46 cm (Z-2.28), and he exhibited bifrontal narrowing, arched eyebrows, down-slanting palpebral fissures (Fig. 1a), bilateral retroauricular pits, global muscular hypotonia and normal external male genitalia. Our clinical approach for assessing global neurodevelopmental delay included brain computed tomography and a basic metabolic screening Hypertrichosis of back and elbows. f Camptodactyly in dried blood sample, both of which were normal at 2 years of age. At 6 years of age, renal ultrasound and column X-ray were requested because of the presence of retroauricular pits, but the findings were within normal limits. Currently, the patient is 15 years old and has a weight of 31.4 kg (Z-4.17), a height of 1.49 m (Z-2.4) and a head circumference of 51.3 cm (Z-2.9). He has a large and smooth philtrum, thick and everted lips, a wide chin, large ears (Fig. 1b), a high and arched palate (Fig. 1c), hypertrichosis of the elbows and back ( Fig. 1d and e) and camptodactyly (Fig. 1f)

Results
G-band karyotyping of peripheral lymphocytes obtained when the patient was 24 months old revealed 46,X, del(Y)(q11) [20] at a resolution of 450 GTG bands. Multiplex PCR revealed the absence of 21 nonpolymorphic sequence-tagged site (STS) markers located in the AZFa, AZFb and AZFc regions, indicating the presence of a terminal Yq deletion (Additional file 1: Figure S1). To delineate the precise deleted genomic Yq interval and to attempt to a phenotype-genotype correlation for our patient, who exhibited unusual clinical manifestations, we performed CMA (Affymetrix CytoS-can™ HD) when the patient was 14 years old. This analysis corroborated a 14.7-Mb deletion of Yq11 (ChrY:14, 064,952-28,766,705, GRCh37), which included the entire AZFabc region (Fig. 2a). However, unexpectedly, we also identified a 10.8-Mb duplication of 17p11.2p12 (Chr17: 10,701,287-21,504,890, GRCh37), which includes the RAI1 and PMP22 genes (Fig. 2b). A posteriori lymphocyte high-resolution cytogenetic analysis enabled us to visualize the duplication, yielding 46,X,del(Y)(q11), dup(17)(p11.2p12) (600 bands) ( Fig. 2c and d). Chromosome painting by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) of chromosomes 17 and Y yielded normal hybridization [ish (wcpY+,wcp17+); Vysis, USA], ruling out the possibility that both alterations were involved in a structural rearrangement (Fig. 2e). Triple gene dosage of PMP22 in the proband was confirmed by Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA; SALSA® MLPA® P033-B4 CMT1 probemix; MRC Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Fig. 2f). Cytogenetic evaluations of both parents yielded normal karyotypes of 46,XX [15] and 46,XY [15] at 450 GTG bands (Additional file 1: Figure S2), and normal chromosome painting of chromosome 17 (Additional file 1: Figure S3). MLPA also yielded normal results in both parents (Additional file 1: Figure S4). Paternity testing was performed using 15 short tandem repeat markers (13 belonging to the CODIS system), and the results confirmed the proband's maternity and paternity (data not shown). Genotyping of the tetranucleotide short tandem repeat (STR) marker, D17S2226, which is located inside the CMT1A region downstream PMP22, indicated that the 17p12 de novo duplication was of maternal origin (Additional file 1: Figure S5).
Having confirmed duplication of the PMP22 gene, we used directed neurological examination to search for typical clinical manifestations of CMT1A disease, and observed distal hypotrophy without clinical paresthesia, along with a highly arched foot. Nerve conduction velocity (NCV) testing showed that the patient had a generalized demyelinating sensory-motor polyneuropathy (motor con-

Discussion and conclusions
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first published description of a patient with de novo non-recurrent large deletion/duplication events involving both chromosomes 17 and Y. The 10.8-Mb duplication of 17p11.2p12 includes the PMP22 and RAI1 genes, being responsible for Yuan-Harel-Lupski syndrome (YUHAL, MIM #616652). Thirty-one YUHAL patients have been reported to date; of them, 22 have de novo duplications [2,[11][12][13][14][15][16] and the others were not analyzed in this context due to the lack of available parental samples [1]. Clinically, 17/23 YUHAL patients [1] exhibited various symptoms, including demyelinating neuropathy (6/6, not searched in all patients), mild to profound developmental delay (17/17), language delay (15/17), infantile hypotonia (15/17), feeding difficulties (12/17), failure to thrive (11/17), behavioral difficulties (10/17), congenital heart defect (7/17) and renal abnormality (3/17). Facial anomalies were identified in five patients, and included down-slanting palpebral fissures (2/5) with or without hypertelorism (3/5). Additionally, Mendez-Rosado et al. [15] reported a patient sharing this duplication due to an unbalanced insertion in 5p13.1 (Table 1). Our patient shares some clinical characteristics with the above-described patients, including global developmental delay, short stature, hypotonia and some facial features (i.e., down-slanting palpebral fissures); however, he does not present congenital heart disease, renal abnormality or autistic features (he has no clinical difficulty with behavior, social interaction and communication) that have been characteristically reported in 70-100% of patients with PTLS [16]. He also presents some features not previously reported for the relevant patients, such as hypertrichosis of the back and elbows (Fig. 1d and e), camptodactyly (Fig. 1f) and preauricular pits. Our patient does not present obvious symptoms suggestive of peripheral neuropathy despite having a duplication of PMP22. However, his NCV test showed a generalized demyelinating sensory-motor polyneuropathy. This is similar to the findings in two previously reported YUHAL patients [12], in which NCV was tested after a molecularly confirmed PMP22 duplication in the absence of suggestive sensory-motor polyneuropathy manifestations.
Yuan et al. [1] described that non-recurrent duplications involving PMP22 and RAI1 arise because these genes have highly identical LCRs and are located in relatively close proximity to one another (2.5 Mb), and could thus theoretically be involved in a single mutational event that might rely on a mechanism such as FoSTeS/MMBIR. Yuan et al. [1] determined the parental origin of the rearrangements in 14/23 subjects, all of which were found to be de novo [1]. In our patient, D17S2226 STR marker analysis revealed that the 17p12 duplication was maternal in origin, and the absence of a trialellic pattern suggested the occurrence of an intrachromosomal homologous recombination characteristic of a non-recurrent rearrangement, rather    than interchromosomal homologous recombination, which is the main mechanism leading to CMT1A [17]. The 14.7-Mb Yq11 deletion identified in our patient includes the AZF regions necessary to promote and maintain spermatogenesis. The literature includes 23 patients with reported Yq deletions involving the euchromatic region; these patients have other clinical anomalies beyond infertility with a variable clinical spectrum and no clear phenotype-genotype correlation [6][7][8][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29]. The most frequent clinical features are development delay or intellectual disability (15/23), short stature (14/23) and azoospermia (9/23). Other reported characteristics are, in order of frequency: facial dysmorphism (brachycephaly, deep-set eyes, down-slanting palpebral fissures, ptosis, epicanthal folds, high or low nasal bridge, small mouth, high arched or cleft palate, dysmorphic ears; 15/23), cardiac defects (2/23) and hypotonia (2/23) ( Table 2). Our patient shows delayed puberty and other manifestations (short stature, developmental delay, facial dysmorphisms and hypotonia); these features have been previously documented in different Yq deletions patients, but no previously reported patient has shown all of the manifestations seen in the present case. Our patient has not undergone any fertility evaluation, but the extent of his Yq deletion suggests that he would be unable to reproduce [30]. As in our patient, most of the previously reported Yq deletions involving the euchromatic region arose as de novo events. A number of mechanisms may account for Yq deletion, including Xp;Yq or Y; autosome translocations [18], isochromosome of the short arm (Yp) [19], Xq-Yq interchange in the paternal germline [20] and nonhomologous intrachromosomal recombination [21]. However, none of the above-listed mechanisms is thought to explain most Y chromosome deletions, which are non-recurrent, varied in size and do not share a common breakpoint. Few of the previous Yq deletion cases were subjected to a detailed molecular breakpoint analysis, nor were they assessed for other chromosomal aberrations, such as the one found in our patient. Given that infertility is the most frequent (and often the only) manifestation identified in patients with deletions of the Y chromosome, we suggest that some of the previously reported Y-deleted patients with clinical manifestations beyond male infertility (e.g., intellectual disability, short stature and/or dysmorphological features) may have had other chromosomal imbalances. We propose that such imbalances should be searched for with CMA, as they may be missed by conventional cytogenetic analysis, as seen in the present case.
There have been a few reported cases involving the simultaneous deletion/duplication of two autosomes due to the presence of a balanced translocation in one parent [31][32][33]. To our knowledge, there are only two previously published cases of two independent de novo chromosomal rearrangements, such described herein. The first was a child with intellectual disability associated with facial dysmorphism, who exhibited two interstitial rearrangements (16q deletion and 17p duplication) identified by array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH). Microsatellite analysis of his parents revealed that the non-recurrent 16q deletion (6.29 Mb) was of paternal origin and the non-recurrent 17p duplication (5.89 Mb, not including the PMP22 gene) was of maternal origin. The authors concluded that the two independent events originated during maternal and paternal meiosis, and seem to have coincided in the patient by chance [9]. The second case was a 6-year-old boy with speech delay, microcephaly and dysmorphic features. He presented a de novo dup (7) (q36.1q36.3) (9.9 Mb) and a del(9)(p24.3) (1.9 Mb) identified by aCGH. His parents presented normal karyotypes and aCGH results, but no further effort was made to identify the parental origin of each alteration. Both 7q duplication and 9p deletion syndromes have been described, but they are heterogeneous and variable in the sizes of the alterations and their clinical manifestations [10].
In summary, this is the first time a 17p12 duplication and Yq deletion have been described in the same individual. The results of our parental karyotype, FISH, MLPA and D17S2226 analyses suggest that these alterations occurred as independent and de novo events in the proband. However, as we analyzed only leukocytes, we cannot rule out a postzygotic event. Based on our present findings, we suggest that the use of CMA would be justified in patients whose clinical phenotype does not correlate completely with a specific chromosomal rearrangement documented by conventional cytogenetics, as we observed in our patient. This approach could enable researchers to more precisely identify the prevalence of patients with developmental delays and/or dysmorphological phenotypes that should be attributed to two or more independent chromosomal rearrangements. Availability of data and materials All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the published article and its supplementary information files.

Ethics approval and consent to participate
The authors have no ethical conflicts to disclose, and the institutional ethics committee approved this study.

Consent for publication
Patients' parents gave written informed consent and approved photographs.

Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.