Skip to main content
Download PDF

Characteristics, treatments, in-hospital and long-term outcomes among inpatients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in China: sex differences in a large cohort study

BMC Pulmonary Medicine volume 24, Article number: 125 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Data related to the characteristics, treatments and clinical outcomes of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) patients in China are limited, and sex differences are still a neglected topic.

Methods

The patients hospitalized for AECOPD were prospectively enrolled from ten medical centers in China between September 2017 and July 2021. Patients from some centers received follow-up for 3 years. Data regarding the characteristics, treatments and in-hospital and long-term clinical outcomes from male and female AECOPD patients included in the cohort were analyzed and compared.

Results

In total, 14,007 patients with AECOPD were included in the study, and 11,020 (78.7%) were males. Compared with males, female patients were older (74.02 ± 10.79 vs. 71.86 ± 10.23 years, P < 0.001), and had more comorbidities (2.22 ± 1.64 vs. 1.73 ± 1.56, P < 0.001), a higher frequency of altered mental status (5.0% vs. 2.9%, P < 0.001), lower diastolic blood pressure (78.04 ± 12.96 vs. 79.04 ± 12.47 mmHg, P < 0.001). In addition, there were also significant sex differences in a range of laboratory and radiographic findings. Females were more likely to receive antibiotics, high levels of respiratory support and ICU admission than males. The in-hospital and 3-year mortality were not significantly different between males and females (1.4% vs. 1.5%, P = 0.711; 35.3% vs. 31.4%, P = 0.058), while female smokers with AECOPD had higher in-hospital mortality than male smokers (3.3% vs. 1.2%, P = 0.002) and male smokers exhibited a trend toward higher 3-year mortality compared to female smokers (40.7% vs. 33.1%, P = 0.146).

Conclusions

In AECOPD inpatients, females and males had similar in-hospital and long-term survival despite some sex differences in clinical characteristics and treatments, but female smokers had significantly worse in-hospital outcomes than male smokers.

Clinical Trial Registration

Retrospectively registered, registration number is ChiCTR2100044625, date of registration 21/03/2021. URL: http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=121626.

Peer Review reports

Background

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is characterized by persistent respiratory symptoms and progressive airflow obstruction, which remains a major cause of morbidity, mortality, and healthcare use worldwide [1, 2]. COPD has a prevalence of 10.1% and affects close to 400 million people worldwide [1, 3]. In China, COPD was the third leading cause of mortality and accounted for approximately 68 deaths per 100 000 population in 2017 [4]. Acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD) is defined as acute, abnormal deterioration of respiratory symptoms, resulting in the need for more radical treatments [5]. It has been reported that 22–40% of patients with COPD experience at least one moderate or severe exacerbation every year, while 9–16% experience more than one [6]. AECOPD has a negative impact on quality of life, accelerates lung function decline and can result in an increased risk of subsequent cardiovascular events and thromboembolic events [7,8,9,10]. Additionally, AECOPD is associated with significant hospitalization and mortality, as well as health and socioeconomic burden [6].

Patients with AECOPD have specific clinical characteristics, including more serious respiratory symptoms, worse clinical outcomes, and higher medication expenditure [11]. It is imperative to identify the characteristics and clinical outcomes to optimize clinical management and improve prognosis. Several studies have explored the characteristics, clinical outcomes and economic burden among AECOPD patients [12,13,14,15]. However, there are limited available data regarding this topic in China. Although COPD is more common among males, its prevalence is rapidly increasing among females [16]. Some studies have reported both long-term physiologic and quality-of-life differences between males and females with stable COPD [17, 18]. However, none have focused on gender-related differences during the treatments of AECOPD.

The present study provides an overview of the characteristics, treatments, in-hospital and long-term clinical outcomes among inpatients with AECOPD by using a larger longitudinal cohort from 10 hospitals in China. We additionally aimed to elucidate more clearly sex differences in patients hospitalized for AECOPD.

Patients and methods

Study design and participants

The MAGNET AECOPD (MAnaGement aNd advErse ouTcomes in inpatients with acute exacerbation of COPD) Registry study was a prospective, noninterventional, multicenter, real-world cohort study. Patients admitted into hospital for AECOPD was consecutively enrolled from 10 medical centers in China between September 2017 and July 2021. The admission and treatment of patients were at the discretion of the attending physicians. The major aims of the MAGNET AECOPD study were to investigate the characteristics, treatments and adverse outcomes (including intensive treatments usage; in-hospital venous thromboembolism (VTE); short- and long-term mortality, readmission, etc.) of inpatients with AECOPD and to establish and validate early warning models of these adverse outcomes, as described previously [19]. The diagnosis of AECOPD was based on the following criteria: (1) a history of COPD, including (i) exposure to risk factors (e.g., tobacco smoking, specific environment exposure); (ii) long-term dyspnea, chronic cough, or sputum production; (iii) postbronchodilator spirometry testing showing a forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1)/forced vital capacity (FVC) ratio less than 70%; and (2) an acute worsening of respiratory symptoms resulting in additional therapy. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of West China Hospital of Sichuan University, and written informed consent was obtained from participants.

Data collection

A standardized case report form was completed for every enrolled patient, including baseline demographics, comorbidities, symptoms and signs on admission, laboratory and radiologic findings, treatments and in-hospital outcomes. Smoking status was dichotomized into smokers and non-smokers. Smokers referred to former or current smokers with at least 10 pack-years of smoking history. In terms of treatments, we evaluated the use of inhaled/nebulized bronchodilators, inhaled/nebulized corticosteroids, systemic corticosteroids (oral or intravenous), antibiotics, and theophylline drugs during hospitalization. We also recorded respiratory support usage including noninvasive mechanical ventilation and invasive mechanical ventilation. The enrolled individuals from 2 medical centers were followed up for 3 years by telephone, outpatient visits, or rehospitalization when necessary. The variables collected in MAGNET AECOPD study are shown in Supplementary Table 1.

Clinical outcomes

We determined in-hospital and long-term outcomes, including all-cause in-hospital mortality, discharge against medical advice, clinical improvement at discharge, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, length of stay (LOS), total hospitalization expenses and 3-year mortality among inpatients with AECOPD. Total hospitalization costs were transformed to US dollars using the average exchange rate in 2017 (one US dollar was equivalent to 6.75 yuan).

Statistical analysis

Categorical data are expressed as percentages, and the chi-square test was used for comparisons between male and female groups. After the normal distribution test, the normally distributed data are expressed as the “mean ± standard deviation,” with a t test used for comparisons, while the abnormally distributed data are expressed as median values with interquartile ranges with a nonparametric test applied to carry out comparisons between the two groups. We additionally compared the in-hospital outcomes and 3-year mortality between female and male smokers with AECOPD. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and log-rank test were used to describe and compare 3-year mortality between male and female patients in the overall cohort and in smokers. Two-tailed P < 0.05 was deemed statistically significant. All analyses were conducted using SPSS version 25.0.

Results

Baseline clinical characteristics

In total, 14,007 patients with AECOPD were included in the MAGNET AECOPD study. The mean age of all study patients was 72.32 ± 10.39 years, and 11,020 (78.7%) were male (Fig. 1). The baseline characteristics and comorbidities of the study patients according to sex are shown in Table 1. Male patients were younger and had a lower BMI than female patients. As expected, smokers were more frequently observed in male patients than in female patients and male smokers had more pack-years of smoking history. There was no significant difference in the frequency of hospitalization due to AECOPD in the past year between male and female patients. Regarding pulmonary function, female patients tended to have a higher FEV1/FVC ratio and FEV1% predicted. The most common complications in the overall cohort were hypertension, chronic pulmonary heart disease, diabetes, and heart failure. There were significant differences in the prevalence of comorbidities, including heart failure, arrhythmia, bronchiectasis, asthma, chronic pulmonary heart disease, hypertension, diabetes, chronic renal insufficiency, venous thromboembolism, and anxiety-depression, between the two groups, which were more frequently observed in female patients than in male patients (all P < 0.05). Pulmonary tuberculosis and active cancer were more prevalent in males. There were no significant differences in the prevalence of coronary heart disease, heart valve problems, interstitial lung disease (ILD), obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS) or stroke between the male and female patients. On average, females showed more numerous comorbidities per patient than males (2.22 ± 1.64 vs. 1.73 ± 1.56, P < 0.001).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flow chart of the study

Full size image
Table 1 Baseline characteristics and comorbidities of the study patients according to sex
Full size table

Clinical manifestations (symptoms and signs)

The most commonly observed clinical manifestations of AECOPD were cough (94.3%), followed by expectoration (91.7%), dyspnea (61.0%), and wheeze (24.6%) (Table 2). Altered mental status, leg edema and P2 hyperactivity were more prevalent in females, and cough and expectoration were more prevalent in males. Regarding vital signs on admission, female patients tended to have lower diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and slower pulse rate (all P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in systolic blood pressure (SBP) between the two groups. In males, blood oxygen saturation was significantly lower than that in females (P < 0.05).

Table 2 Clinical features of the study patients according to sex
Full size table

Laboratory and radiographic findings

The laboratory and radiographic findings of the study patients are summarized in Table 3. Anemia and increased white blood cell (WBC) counts were more common in males, whereas decreased eosinophil ratios (EOSRs) and platelet (PLT) counts were more common in females (all P < 0.05). Compared to female patients, male patients had higher levels of creatinine and C-reactive protein and had lower levels of albumin in blood. There were no significant differences between the male and female groups in terms of neutrophil ratio (NEUT%), partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2), partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and urea nitrogen (BUN) as well as N-terminal pro-B type natriuretic peptide (NT-pro BNP), troponin T, D-dimer and procalcitonin (PCT). In CT findings, pulmonary bulla and pulmonary interstitial fibrosis were more frequently observed in male patients, and pulmonary artery enlargement, pleural effusion, atelectasis/consolidation, and bronchiectasis were more common in female patients.

Table 3 Laboratory and imaging findings of the study patients according to sex
Full size table

Treatments characteristics

During hospitalization, inhaled/nebulized bronchodilators, inhaled/nebulized corticosteroids, systemic corticosteroids, antibiotics and theophylline drugs were given to 70.4%, 56.0%, 41.0%, 64.9% and 55.1% of the overall cohort, respectively (Table 4). In sex comparisons, inhaled/nebulized bronchodilators, inhaled/nebulized corticosteroids, systemic corticosteroids and theophylline drugs were all prescribed more often to male patients than to female patients. Females were more likely to receive antibiotics than males. For respiratory support, 20.1% and 3.3% of the patients received noninvasive and invasive mechanical ventilation during hospitalization, respectively. Females with AECOPD more often received high levels of respiratory support than males (including noninvasive (22.8% vs. 19.3%, P < 0.001) or invasive mechanical ventilation (4.3% vs. 3.0%, P = 0.001).

Table 4 Usage of treatment in the study patients according to sex
Full size table

In-hospital and long-term clinical outcomes and sex differences in the overall cohort

For all patients enrolled in our study, the overall all-cause mortality during hospitalization was 1.4%, which corresponded to 201 cases of death (Table 5); 469 (3.3%) discharged against medical advice, 13,337 (95.2%) had been discharged from hospitals after showing improvement, and 1035 (7.4%) were admitted into the ICU. The median LOS was 9 days, and the total cost was 1911 (IQR: 1294–2936) US dollars. No statistically significant differences in hospital mortality (1.4% vs. 1.5%, P = 0.711) and incidence of discharge against medical advice (3.3% vs. 3.4%, P = 0.820) were observed between male and female patients with AECOPD (Fig. 2 and Supplementary Fig. 1). ICU admission in female patients was more needed during hospitalization than in male patients (9.1% vs. 6.9%, P < 0.001) (Fig. 3). However, the mean length of stay and total costs during hospitalization showed no significant differences between the two groups.

Table 5 Short-term and long-term clinical outcomes in the overall cohort of AECOPD inpatients according to sex
Full size table
Fig. 2
figure 2

The in-hospital mortality in the overall cohort and the subgroup of smokers according to sex

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure 3

The incidence of ICU admission at discharge in the overall cohort and the subgroup of smokers according to sex

Full size image

A total of 2852 patients from two out of the ten medical centers were followed up for 3 years, 978 patients (752 males and 226 females) died during the follow-up corresponding to a relatively high all-cause mortality of 34.3% (Supplementary Fig. 2). There was no significant difference in the 3-year mortality between male and female patients (35.3% vs. 31.4%, P = 0.058), although a higher trend in males can be observed. Using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, the 3-year survival difference between male and female patients was not found to be significantly different either. (P = 0.06; Fig. 4A).

Fig. 4
figure 4

(A) Survival curve of the overall cohort according to sex. (B) Survival curve of the subgroup of smokers according to sex

Full size image

In-hospital and long-term clinical outcomes and sex differences in smokers

A total of 8652 (61.8%) smokers with AECOPD were included in our study. Among them, 8351 (96.5%) were males, and 301 (3.5%) were females (Supplementary Fig. 3). The in-hospital and long-term clinical outcomes in smokers with AECOPD are shown in Table 6. A total of 112 smokers (1.3%) died during hospitalization, 306 (3.5%) discharged against medical advice, 8234 (95.2%) had been discharged from hospitals after showing improvement, and 586 (6.8%) were admitted into the ICU. Both the in-hospital mortality and incidence of ICU admission in female smokers were significantly higher than those in male smokers (3.3% vs. 1.2%, P = 0.002; 9.6% vs. 6.7%, P = 0.044) (Figs. 2 and 3). However, the incidence of discharge against medical advice (3.5% vs. 4.0%, P = 0.667) showed no significant differences between male and female smokers (Supplementary Fig. 1). The 3-year mortality in female smokers was higher than male smokers, but the difference was not statistically significant (40.7% vs. 33.1%, P = 0.146). Similarly, there was no difference in survival between female and male smokers using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis although females showed a trend towards higher long-term mortality (P = 0.12; Fig. 4B).

Table 6 Short-term and long-term clinical outcomes in smokers with AECOPD according to sex
Full size table

Discussion

Numerous studies have described the clinical features, management and prognosis of patients with stable COPD [12, 13, 20, 21]; however, there are limited available data regarding the characteristics, treatments and in-hospital clinical outcomes among AECOPD patients, especially in China. In our multicenter cohort study that enrolled 14,007 patients with AECOPD, the most common complications in the overall cohort were hypertension, chronic pulmonary heart disease, diabetes and heart failure, and the most commonly observed clinical manifestations of AECOPD were cough, followed by expectoration, dyspnea and wheeze, as expected. During hospitalization, inhaled/nebulized bronchodilators, inhaled/nebulized corticosteroids, systemic corticosteroids, antibiotics and theophylline drugs were given to 70.4%, 56.0%, 41.0%, 64.9% and 55.1% of the overall cohort, respectively. In our study, the overall all-cause mortality, the incidence of discharge against medical advice and ICU admission among the population were 1.4%, 3.3% and 7.4%, respectively. The all-cause mortality was lower than previous findings by investigations conducted in the US and Italy [20, 21]. However, after considering the 469 (3.3%) patients discharged against medical advice in most cases because of clinical deterioration, in whom death probably occurred shortly after discharge, the incidence of adverse outcomes was close to those in previous studies [20, 21]. Additionally, a large multicenter investigation recently conducted in China (ACURE study) reported that the overall rate of mortality was only 0.1% in AECOPD inpatients [22]. Compared with the ACURE study, more patients were included in our study (14,007 vs. 5334), although the sex proportion was almost the same in the two studies. However, the median age was older, and the incidence of noninvasive ventilation, invasive ventilation and ICU admission were more common in our cohort than in the ACURE study.

A growing body of evidence suggests that sex differences exist in clinical manifestations and prognosis in stable COPD [23, 24]. However, much less is known about any sex differences in characteristics, treatments and in-hospital clinical outcomes during AECOPD. Therefore, we yielded evidence on the sex differences in clinical characteristics, management patterns and in-hospital and long-term outcomes in the real-life clinical practice of 14,007 AECOPD patients in China, which may contribute to providing better disease management strategies. In summary, there was no significant difference in in-hospital and long-term mortality rate between male and female patients in the overall cohort, despite different clinical characteristics and treatments being observed between the two groups. Interestingly, we found that the in-hospital mortality in female smokers with AECOPD were much higher than that in male smokers (3.3% vs. 1.2%, P < 0.05). The sex differences in patients with AECOPD varied among countries and regions. In the United States, females had higher rates of asthma and several psychiatric comorbidities, shorter length of stay and lower 30-day readmission rate [25]. In Spain, muscle damage was more often present in female patients compared to male patients with AECOPD [26]. This discrepancy is probably due to the ethnic difference, or socio-environmental factors.

Although male patients were younger, they tended to have worse nutritional conditions, which was manifested by lower BMI and lower albumin levels. In our study, smokers were more common in males than in females (75.8% vs. 10.1%, P < 0.001), and being consistent with this, lung function parameters (FEV1/FVC and FEV1/% predicted) from stable stage of male patients was worse than those of female patients. This reflected the enormous adverse effect of smoking on lung function [27]. Comorbidities have been shown to impair quality of life and contribute to hospital admissions and mortality in COPD patients [28]. Many researchers have studied the sex differences in comorbidities among COPD patients (most were stable COPD); however, a consensus was not reached, which might be attributed to different study populations in those studies [29,30,31]. For example, Agusti et al. found that cardiovascular comorbidity and diabetes were less common among females in the ECLIPSE cohort [29]; Almagro et al. acknowledged that females with COPD had less ischemic heart disease and alcoholism but more chronic heart failure and diabetes in a European study [30]. In the current study, we found significant differences in the prevalence of comorbidities between female and male patients. On average, females showed more numerous comorbidities than males, which was similar to the findings of a prospective investigation conducted in Poland [32]. In particular, disease distribution showed that hypertension, heart failure, arrhythmia, bronchiectasis, asthma, chronic pulmonary heart disease, diabetes, chronic renal disease, venous thromboembolism and anxiety-depression were more frequent in females, but malignancy and pulmonary tuberculosis were more frequent in males.

In terms of the clinical manifestations, altered mental status and lower diastolic blood pressure on admission were more prevalent in females. Male patients with AECOPD had higher level of inflammation indices, such as higher white blood cells and C-reactive protein (CRP), but female patients were more likely to have CT manifestations that indicate pulmonary infection, such as atelectasis/consolidation, pleural effusion, bronchiectasis, etc. Eosinophils have become an important biomarker in the management of stable COPD and AECOPD [33, 34]. Cumulative researches have shown that eosinophil counts could guide the use of corticosteroids, and COPD or AECOPD patients with high eosinophils responded better to corticosteroids [35]. In this study, we found that males had a higher eosinophil ratio than females. In terms of management of AECOPD in this real-world study, drug administration including inhaled/nebulized bronchodilators, inhaled/nebulized corticosteroids, systemic corticosteroids and theophylline drugs were more frequent in males, while antibiotics were more frequently provided to females. Similar to our results, Bade et al. considered that female veterans with AECOPD were less likely to be treated with antimuscarinic or combined bronchodilator/inhaled corticosteroid inhaler [25]. It can be inferred that the medication strategies for AECOPD patients basically corresponded to the characteristics of clinical symptoms and laboratory and radiologic results of male and female patients. Compared with females, male patients had more obvious symptoms of cough, expectoration, dyspnea and higher proportion of eosinophils, so as to be more likely to accept bronchodilators and corticosteroids. However, although male patients had higher level of blood inflammation indices, antibiotics were more frequently provided to females. This may suggest that physicians tended to prescribe antibiotics to patients with lung infection indicated by radiologic findings rather than only indicated by blood inflammation indicators in the real world. In addition to with more comorbidities, being more likely to have altered mental status and lower diastolic blood pressure, female patients also had higher incidence of receiving noninvasive and invasive mechanical ventilation than males, which all suggest that female patients with AECOPD may have more serious illness and worse prognosis.

The differences between males and females in the outcomes of AECOPD have not been clearly identified. In a cohort from the Québec provincial health insurance plan in Canada, Gonzalez et al. observed that male sex was associated with a significantly increased risk of mortality and with a significantly increased risk of rehospitalization for obstructive airways disease [36]. In contrast, Machado et al. believed that females with severe COPD had a greater risk of death than male patients [37]. In our study, no statistically significant differences in hospital and long-term mortality were observed between male and female patients with AECOPD, although female patients were more likely to admitted into ICU during hospitalization. Aryal et al. proposed a possibility that females were less likely to self-medicate with anticholinergic agents and were less likely to seek emergency care within the first 24 h of exacerbation, which could at least in part play a role in more serious illness state on admission and higher incidence of ICU admission [38]. Unfortunately, this proposal is hard to confirm in our study. Interestingly, in the subgroup of smokers, we found the in-hospital mortality in female patients was much higher than that in males. There were two main explanations for this finding. First, females may be more susceptible to the harmful effects of smoking than males, leading to more severe disease for the equivalent quantity of cigarettes consumed [39,40,41]. This perception has been validated in animal studies and human pathology specimens, which have demonstrated a greater burden of small airway disease in females than in males with COPD despite a similar history of tobacco smoke exposure [42, 43]. Second, females are found to quit smoking less frequently and have a lower success rate of long-term smoking cessation than male patients [38], so the long-term tobacco exposure may also aggravates the disease. Being consistent with this explanation, the smoking cessation rate in female smokers was lower than that in male smokers in our study (6.6% vs. 52.4%, P < 0.001).

Our study had several strengths including: (a) We elucidated clear and comprehensive sex differences in the characteristics, treatments and in-hospital clinical outcomes of AECOPD using a large number of AECOPD patients from the prospective multicenter registry study. To our knowledge, this was the first large-scale study to explore sex differences in patients with AECOPD in China. (b) Our findings may provide necessary information to guide intervention planning as a way to minimize the burden caused by AECOPD in the Chinese population (for example, we should strengthen propaganda of smoking cessation among female patients, and pay attention to the changes in the condition of female smokers with AECOPD to reduce the adverse prognosis). This study also has several limitations. First, we were unable to assess the GOLD ABCD classifications among patients because the degree of dyspnea was not measured quantitatively. Second, only a small proportion of patients have completed follow-up in our study, which may prevent us from evaluating the sex differences in the long-term clinical outcomes of AECOPD patients without bias.

Conclusions

Using a large AECOPD cohort, we revealed sex differences in the characteristics, treatments, in-hospital and long-term clinical outcomes of AECOPD. Although there were several sex differences in clinical characteristics and treatments, such as older age, more comorbidities, higher frequency of altered mental status, lower diastolic blood pressure, and receiving higher levels of respiratory support as well as higher incidence of ICU admission in females than in males, there was no sex difference in in-hospital and long-term mortality in patients with AECOPD in the overall cohort. However, the in-hospital mortality in female smokers with AECOPD were much higher than those in male smokers. Our findings may provide necessary information to guide clinical management of AECOPD based on sex differences, and further research is required to understand why potential sex-associated differences exist.

Data availability

The data will be shared on reasonable request to the corresponding author.

References

  1. Labaki WW, Rosenberg SR. Chronic obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Ann Intern Med. 2020;173(3):Itc17–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Christenson SA, Smith BM, Bafadhel M, Putcha N. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Lancet. 2022;399(10342):2227–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Global regional. National age-sex-specific mortality for 282 causes of death in 195 countries and territories, 1980–2017: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2017. Lancet. 2018;392(10159):1736–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhou M, Wang H, Zeng X, Yin P, Zhu J, Chen W, Li X, Wang L, Wang L, Liu Y, et al. Mortality, morbidity, and risk factors in China and its provinces, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the global burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2019;394(10204):1145–58.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Suissa S, Dell’Aniello S, Ernst P. Long-term natural history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: severe exacerbations and mortality. Thorax. 2012;67(11):957–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mathioudakis AG, Janssens W, Sivapalan P, Singanayagam A, Dransfield MT, Jensen JS, Vestbo J. Acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: in search of diagnostic biomarkers and treatable traits. Thorax. 2020;75(6):520–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wedzicha JAEC-C, Miravitlles M, Hurst JR, Calverley PM, Albert RK, Anzueto A, Criner GJ, Papi A, Rabe KF, Rigau D et al. Management of COPD exacerbations: a European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society guideline. Eur Respir J 2017, 49(3).

  8. Kunisaki KM, Dransfield MT, Anderson JA, Brook RD, Calverley PMA, Celli BR, Crim C, Hartley BF, Martinez FJ, Newby DE, et al. Exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and cardiac events. A Post Hoc Cohort Analysis from the SUMMIT Randomized Clinical Trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018;198(1):51–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Donaldson GC, Seemungal TA, Bhowmik A, Wedzicha JA. Relationship between exacerbation frequency and lung function decline in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Thorax. 2002;57(10):847–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Undas A, Jankowski M, Kaczmarek P, Sladek K, Brummel-Ziedins K. Thrombin generation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: dependence on plasma factor composition. Thromb Res. 2011;128(4):e24–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Li L, Zhao N, Ma X, Sun F, He B, Qin Z, Wu K, Wang X, Zhao Q, Zhang S, et al. Personalized variable vs fixed-dose systemic corticosteroid therapy in hospitalized patients with Acute exacerbations of COPD: a prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, open-label clinical trial. Chest. 2021;160(5):1660–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Molinari N, Chanez P, Roche N, Ahmed E, Vachier I, Bourdin A. Rising total costs and mortality rates associated with admissions due to COPD exacerbations. Respir Res. 2016;17(1):149.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Berkius J, Nolin T, Mårdh C, Karlström G, Walther SM. Characteristics and long-term outcome of acute exacerbations in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: an analysis of cases in the Swedish Intensive Care Registry during 2002–2006. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2008;52(6):759–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Nguyen PL, Uddin MM, Mir T, Khalil A, Regmi N, Pervaiz A, Hussain T, Babu MA, Ullah I, Patel P, et al. Trends in Incidence, and mortality of Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in the United States Emergency Department (2010–2018). Copd. 2021;18(5):567–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Jinjuvadia C, Jinjuvadia R, Mandapakala C, Durairajan N, Liangpunsakul S, Soubani AO. Trends in outcomes, Financial Burden, and mortality for Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) in the United States from 2002 to 2010. Copd. 2017;14(1):72–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Viegi G, Scognamiglio A, Baldacci S, Pistelli F, Carrozzi L. Epidemiology of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Respiration. 2001;68(1):4–19.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Silverman EK, Weiss ST, Drazen JM, Chapman HA, Carey V, Campbell EJ, Denish P, Silverman RA, Celedon JC, Reilly JJ, et al. Gender-related differences in severe, early-onset chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000;162(6):2152–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sunyer J, Antó JM, McFarlane D, Domingo A, Tobías A, Barceló MA, Múnoz A. Sex differences in mortality of people who visited emergency rooms for asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998;158(3):851–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhou C, Yi Q, Ge H, Wei H, Liu H, Zhang J, Luo Y, Pan P, Zhang J, Peng L, et al. Validation of Risk Assessment models Predicting venous thromboembolism in inpatients with Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: a Multicenter Cohort Study in China. Thromb Haemost. 2022;122(7):1177–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tabak YP, Sun X, Johannes RS, Gupta V, Shorr AF. Mortality and need for mechanical ventilation in acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: development and validation of a simple risk score. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(17):1595–602.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Montagnani A, Mathieu G, Pomero F, Bertù L, Manfellotto D, Campanini M, Fontanella A, Sposato B, Dentali F. Hospitalization and mortality for acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): an Italian population-based study. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2020;24(12):6899–907.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Liang C, Mao X, Niu H, Huang K, Dong F, Chen Y, Huang K, Zhan Q, Huang Y, Zhang Y, et al. Characteristics, management and In-Hospital clinical outcomes among inpatients with Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in China: results from the Phase I Data of ACURE Study. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2021;16:451–65.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Lopez Varela MV, Montes de Oca M, Halbert RJ, Muiño A, Perez-Padilla R, Tálamo C, Jardim JR, Valdivia G, Pertuzé J, Moreno D, et al. Sex-related differences in COPD in five latin American cities: the PLATINO study. Eur Respir J. 2010;36(5):1034–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. de Torres JP, Cote CG, López MV, Casanova C, Díaz O, Marin JM, Pinto-Plata V, de Oca MM, Nekach H, Dordelly LJ, et al. Sex differences in mortality in patients with COPD. Eur Respir J. 2009;33(3):528–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Bade BC, DeRycke EC, Ramsey C, Skanderson M, Crothers K, Haskell S, Bean-Mayberry B, Brandt C, Bastian LA, Akgün KM. Sex differences in Veterans admitted to the Hospital for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Exacerbation. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2019;16(6):707–14.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Ausín P, Martínez-Llorens J, Sabaté-Bresco M, Casadevall C, Barreiro E, Gea J. Sex differences in function and structure of the quadriceps muscle in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients. Chron Respir Dis. 2017;14(2):127–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Tashkin DP. Smoking Cessation in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2015;36(4):491–507.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Sievi NA, Senn O, Brack T, Brutsche MH, Frey M, Irani S, Leuppi JD, Thurnheer R, Franzen D, Kohler M, et al. Impact of comorbidities on physical activity in COPD. Respirology. 2015;20(3):413–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Agusti A, Calverley PM, Celli B, Coxson HO, Edwards LD, Lomas DA, MacNee W, Miller BE, Rennard S, Silverman EK, et al. Characterisation of COPD heterogeneity in the ECLIPSE cohort. Respir Res. 2010;11(1):122.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Almagro P, López García F, Cabrera FJ, Montero L, Morchón D, Díez J, Soriano JB. Comorbidity and gender-related differences in patients hospitalized for COPD. The ECCO study. Respir Med. 2010;104(2):253–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ekström MP, Jogréus C, Ström KE. Comorbidity and sex-related differences in mortality in oxygen-dependent chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(4):e35806.

    Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Grabicki M, Kuźnar-Kamińska B, Rubinsztajn R, Brajer-Luftmann B, Kosacka M, Nowicka A, Piorunek T, Kostrzewska M, Chazan R, Batura-Gabryel H. COPD Course and comorbidities: are there gender differences? Adv Exp Med Biol. 2019;1113:43–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Wade RC, Wells JM. POINT: are eosinophils useful for the management of COPD? Yes. Chest. 2020;157(5):1073–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Couillard S, Larivée P, Courteau J, Vanasse A. Eosinophils in COPD exacerbations are Associated with increased readmissions. Chest. 2017;151(2):366–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Pascoe S, Barnes N, Brusselle G, Compton C, Criner GJ, Dransfield MT, Halpin DMG, Han MK, Hartley B, Lange P, et al. Blood eosinophils and treatment response with triple and dual combination therapy in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: analysis of the IMPACT trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2019;7(9):745–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Gonzalez AV, Suissa S, Ernst P. Gender differences in survival following hospitalisation for COPD. Thorax. 2011;66(1):38–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Machado MC, Krishnan JA, Buist SA, Bilderback AL, Fazolo GP, Santarosa MG, Queiroga F Jr., Vollmer WM. Sex differences in survival of oxygen-dependent patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006;174(5):524–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Aryal S, Diaz-Guzman E, Mannino DM. COPD and gender differences: an update. Transl Res. 2013;162(4):208–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Ntritsos G, Franek J, Belbasis L, Christou MA, Markozannes G, Altman P, Fogel R, Sayre T, Ntzani EE, Evangelou E. Gender-specific estimates of COPD prevalence: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2018;13:1507–14.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Foreman MG, Zhang L, Murphy J, Hansel NN, Make B, Hokanson JE, Washko G, Regan EA, Crapo JD, Silverman EK, et al. Early-onset chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is associated with female sex, maternal factors, and African American race in the COPDGene Study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011;184(4):414–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Amaral AFS, Strachan DP, Burney PGJ, Jarvis DL. Female smokers are at Greater risk of airflow obstruction Than male smokers. UK Biobank. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017;195(9):1226–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Martinez FJ, Curtis JL, Sciurba F, Mumford J, Giardino ND, Weinmann G, Kazerooni E, Murray S, Criner GJ, Sin DD, et al. Sex differences in severe pulmonary emphysema. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007;176(3):243–52.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Tam A, Churg A, Wright JL, Zhou S, Kirby M, Coxson HO, Lam S, Man SF, Sin DD. Sex differences in Airway Remodeling in a mouse model of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016;193(8):825–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82170013), the Sichuan Science and Technology Program (2022YFS0262) and the National Key Research Program of China (2016YFC1304202).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Jiarui Zhang and Qun Yi contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Guo-xue-xiang 37#, Wuhou District, 610041, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China

    Jiarui Zhang, Qun Yi, Adila Aili, Yu Liu, Lige Peng, Jiaqi Pu & Haixia Zhou

  2. Sichuan Cancer Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China

    Qun Yi

  3. West China School of Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China

    Chen Zhou

  4. State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China

    Yuanming Luo

  5. Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, People’s Hospital of Leshan, Leshan, Sichuan Province, China

    Hailong Wei

  6. Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China

    Huiqing Ge

  7. Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei Province, China

    Huiguo Liu

  8. Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei Province, China

    Jianchu Zhang

  9. Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, the First People’s Hospital of Neijiang City, Neijiang, Sichuan Province, China

    Xianhua Li & Xiufang Xie

  10. Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province, China

    Pinhua Pan

  11. Department of Emergency, First People’s Hospital of Jiujiang, Jiujiang, Jiangxi Province, China

    Mengqiu Yi & Lina Cheng

  12. Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China

    Hui Zhou & Liang Liu

Authors
  1. Jiarui Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Qun Yi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Chen Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yuanming Luo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Hailong Wei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Huiqing Ge
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Huiguo Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Jianchu Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Xianhua Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Xiufang Xie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Pinhua Pan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Mengqiu Yi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Lina Cheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Hui Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Liang Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Adila Aili
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Yu Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  18. Lige Peng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  19. Jiaqi Pu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  20. Haixia Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

JZ, and HZ contributed to the analysis and interpretation of the data, and drafted the manuscript. QY contributed to the design of the study and final approval of the version to be published. All other authors contributed to the acquisition and interpretation of the data and reviewed the manuscript. We appreciate the support and collaboration of the coinvestigators participating in the MAGNET AECOPD Registry study.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Haixia Zhou.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of West China Hospital of Sichuan University. Written informed consent was obtained from all the participants.

Consent for publication

The participant has consented to the submission of this article to the journal.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research had no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

12890_2024_2948_MOESM1_ESM.docx

Supplementary Material 1. Table S1: Variables recorded in MAGNET AECOPD study; Figure S1: The incidence of discharge against medical advice at discharge in the overall cohort and the subgroup of smokers according to sex; Figure S2: The long-term clinical outcomes in patients with AECOPD; Figure S3: The in-hospital clinical outcomes in the smokers with AECOPD

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, J., Yi, Q., Zhou, C. et al. Characteristics, treatments, in-hospital and long-term outcomes among inpatients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in China: sex differences in a large cohort study. BMC Pulm Med 24, 125 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-024-02948-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-024-02948-4

Keywords

BMC Pulmonary Medicine

ISSN: 1471-2466

Contact us