Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.
Skip to main content
Download PDF

Assessment of quality of life, treatment practices, and associated factors among children of atopic dermatitis patients at all Africa leprosy, TB and rehabilitation training center (A.L.E.R.T): a prospective observational study

BMC Pediatrics volume 25, Article number: 241 (2025) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is the most common chronic skin disease in children. It adversely affects child’s physical health, daily functioning, and overall quality of life (QoL), impacting not only the child but also their families. There is a paucity of data in Ethiopia about treatment practices and QoL among children with AD. Thus, this study aimed to assess QoL, treatment practice, AD symptom control statues and associated factors for QoL among children with AD at ALERT dermatovenerology unit, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Method

Prospective observational study was employed on 403 patients. Structured questionnaire and Child Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) tool were used to collect the data. Descriptive statistics and multivariable logistic regression model were used to analyze the data.

Results

The mean (± SD) age of participants was 8.04 (± 3.40) years. Topically applied readymade medicine, antihistamine and emollient were given for (55.6%, n = 224), (24.3%, n = 98) and (75.8%, n = 305) participants, respectively. The mean (± SD) QoL was 8.42(± 3.57) indicating moderate effect. Domain of itching, dressing and sleeping was the utmost affected QoL. Three-fourths (76.9%, n = 310) of patients had their AD symptoms controlled. Caregivers who were government employees [AOR = 4.9, 95% CI: 1.22, 19.71, P = 0.02], daily labourer caregivers [AOR = 7.3, 95% CI: 1.15, 45.7, P = 0.03] and, those with moderate AD [AOR = 2.8, 95 % CI: 1.59, 4.96, P = <0.001] were significantly associated with QoL, as well as caregivers with very low (≤ 860) [AOR = 0.09, 95% CI: 0.01, 0.68, P = 0.02], low (861–1500) monthly income [AOR = 0.20, 95% CI: 0.05, 0.90, P = 0.03].

Conclusion

Patients with AD had a moderate QoL based on their CDLQL score. Three-fourths of the study participants who experienced AD-related symptoms had them controlled after 4 weeks of treatment. Among the CDLQI domains, itching and scratching, dressing problems and sleeping problems were the most affected. Caregiver employment status, monthly income, moderate type of AD and facial involvement were significantly associated with QoL outcomes.

Peer Review reports

Background

According to the definition of the American Academy of Dermatology (AAD), Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a widespread, persistent, itchy, inflammatory skin disease that impacts individuals of all age group. However, it is more common in children [1,2,3] with a wide range of severity and skin barrier defects [4]. AD ranked as the 15th nonfatal with the largest disease burden among skin diseases [5]. It impacted up to 2.4% of the world’s population. According to the recent findings, the prevalence of AD is increasing in Africa, and ranges from 4.7 to 23% [6, 7].

AD doesn’t respond to various treatment approach, and many patients will experience a chronic course of the disease. However, various treatment approaches exist to alleviate the exacerbations of the disease, reducing the duration, and degree of the flare [8]. In most patients with mild-to-moderate case of AD, management can be achieved by restoration of the skin through emollient use, avoidance of typical AD triggers, employing specific behavioural strategies to reduce scratching, implementing antibacterial measures, and using of topical and/or systemic anti-inflammatory drugs. Overall, the use of emollient is essential and fundamental of effective approach for managing AD [8, 9].

Results from multiple studies demonstrated that AD has a large impact on social functioning, mental health, physical health, emotional health and vitality regardless of the age of the patient. In generally, AD has as large impact on QoL of patients as other common chronic illness and dermatologic disease [10]. This ailment has a notably clinical and humanistic burden on patient-reported symptoms and QoL measures. It also demonstrated that AD can lead to anxiety and depression. Alongside its significant economic burden [11]. The existing global treatment practices and the unmet needs of individual with moderate-to-severe AD managed with systemic therapies are inadequately reported [12].

Western nations have carried out substantial research on various treatment options and HRQoL (Health-Related Quality of Life) among AD patients and provided their recommendations. Nonetheless, these findings cannot be directly extrapolated to the Africa context, particularly in Ethiopia, due to differences in genetic composition, environmental condition, economic statues, cultural influences, health care access, and medicine availability [13].

AD is becoming a rising public health issue in developing countries, like those in Africa. Nevertheless, these continents are not sufficiently depicted in dermatology literature, and there is limited information available regarding the increasing burden of AD. Consequently, this disease place strain on health care resources, access to treatment, and patient QoL [14]. Moreover, AD patients and their families encountered challenges in their social, clinical, and academic achievements [15], as well as in their economic, occupational, personal and emotional aspects [16]. Collectively, these factors increase both direct and indirect health care expenses and lower national productivity [17]. On top of that, there remains a lack of adequate data regarding the impact of AD on the QoL patients [14], as well as the efficacy standard anti- AD treatment in non-white ethnic populations [18]. Moreover, in Ethiopia, little is known regarding the treatment practices, impact of AD on patients’ QoL, as well as contributing factors for QoL among individuals with AD. Therefore, since the necessary data is lacking, this study aims to evaluate the treatment practices, QoL, status of AD symptom control, and accompanying factors that impact the quality of life among patients with AD at the A.L.E.R.T centre Dermatovenerology Unit.

Materials and methods

Study setting

This study was carried out at ALERT Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, Dermatovenerology Unit. It is located at the capital city of Ethiopia, Addis Ababa at 7 km southwest on the way to Jimma Road in Kolfe Keranio sub city in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. This Hospital delivers extensive clinical services in traumatology, gynaecology, tuberculosis, dermatovenerology, leprosy treatment, plastic and reconstructive surgery, ophthalmology, paediatric and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), orthopaedics surgery in the country.

Study design and period

A prospective observational study was designed using a two-pronged approach. The first step involved patient interviews and chart reviews, followed by an evaluation of AD symptom improvement after 4 weeks of treatment. The study was conducted from December 1, 2022 to May 30, 2023.

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

All children with AD who were receiving treatment at the ALERT Dermatovenerology Unit during the study period, aged 5 to 16 years old, had active follow-up and had been receiving anti-AD treatment for the last 4 weeks were included in the study. However, children under five years old, and those with mental health problems, hearing impairments or any other serious health problems, as well as those with chronic skin disease like psoriasis, acne vulgaris, seborrheic dermatitis, vitiligo and dermatophytosis, who didn’t respond ≥ 2 CDLQI questions and were unable to give consent and assent to participate were excluded from this study.

Sample size determination and sampling techniques

The sample size was calculated using a single population proportion formula. Since no previous study had been conducted on the HRQoL among children with AD in Ethiopia, the proportion was assumed to be 50%. Therefore, the sample size was determined to be 384, with an additional 10% of contingency for non-response, drop outs and refusals to participate, bringing the final sample size to 422. To select study participants, we used a systematic random sampling method. The sampling interval (K th) was calculated by dividing the total number of children with AD seen at Dermatovenerology Unit before the study period (January1st to June 31, 2022) by the intended sample size (1728/ 422). The first child was then selected at every fourth interval of study participants. After excluding participants who did not meet the inclusion criteria, 403 study participants were included in the final analysis.

Data collection instruments

Data was collected by using an interviewer administered questionnaire. Moreover, the data collection tool was designed by reviewing related published articles to capture the relevant socio-demographic and clinical characteristics, therapeutic intervention, and AD pruritus pattern and overall AD symptoms improvement and quality of life. The QoL was assessed using child dermatology life quality index (CDLQI) questionnaires.

Children’s Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) tool is applicable for 5 to 16 years old. This tool demonstrated high validity and reliability ranging from good to excellent and also the first instrument to assess skin related QoL. It was widely used for more than 80 countries and was translated into more than 110 languages including Amharic [19]. It contains a 10 QoL inquiry with 6 subdomains; symptoms and feelings (questions 1 and 2), leisure (questions 4, 5 and 6), school or holidays (question 7), personal relationships (questions 3 and 8), sleep (question 9) and treatment (question 10). Every question of the CDLQI is responded to with ‘only a little,’ ‘quite a lot,’ or ‘very much’, and assigned scored 0, 1, 2 or 3, respectively. The sole exception to this scoring method is question 7, where the possible responses ‘very much’ is substituted with ‘prevented school,’ and the question is scored in the same manner from, 0–3 [20, 21]. The proposed classification for the score reflecting impairment in QoL due to AD includes: no effect (0–1 score), small effect (2–6 score), moderate effect (7–12 score), very large effect (13–18 effect), and extremely large effect (19–30 score).CDLQI scores ranging from 0 to 5 were viewed as indicating no effect on QOL, whereas scores of 6 or higher were seen as indicating an “impact on QOL.” [22]. The severity of AD was evaluated using objective SCORAD, which contain extent and intensity of the AD lesions, divided into three levels: < 15 mildly sever, 15–40 moderately sever, > 40 severely affected [23].

Data collectors and quality assurance

One trained clinical pharmacist was supervisor, and one dermatologist trainer working in Dermatovenerology Unit was involved in data collection procedure. The CDLQI questionnaire was validated on 200 AD children before conducting this study. To keep the quality of data, supervisor and data collectors was trained for 2 days with regard to data collection, sampling strategy, ethical principles and data handling methods before the actual involvement of data collection. Pre-test was done on 5% (n = 15) of AD patients, before 2 weeks of real time periods for data collection to secure the consistency and understandability of the checklist. After pretest, the final data collection tool was advanced with some correction after a deep evaluation of feedbacks obtained during the pre-test periods. The pre-tested patients were excluded from the analysis.

Data analysis and interpretation

Collected data were initially checked manually for completeness and consistency by supervisors during data collection and then rechecked at the office by the principal investigator before data entry. The data were entered into the Epi Info Version 7 database and exported to Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) version 25 for analysis. Descriptive statistics in SPSS were used to compute mean and standard deviation for continuous variables and frequency and percentage for categorical variables to summarize the results. Results were presented using texts, tables and figures.

All statistical methods for variables were checked to ensure they met test assumptions using Pearson correlation test. Variables with a correlation coefficient of > 0.7 were considered for the final model. Missing data were handled using the list-wise deletion method. Variables with P-values < 0.2 in the univariate analysis were included in the multiple binary logistic regressions to control for confounders. The significance level was set at a p–value ≤ 0.05 and results were reported as odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals.

Results

Sociodemographic characteristics of study participants

Overall, 422 children with AD were recruited for this study, of which 19 patients (4.5%) were lost to follow up. A total of 403 study subjects were included in the final analysis (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Patient disposition flow chart of AD patients attending at ALERT comprehensive specialized hospital, Dermatovenerology Unit, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, from September 01, 2022 to February 28, 2023 (n = 403)

Full size image

Female patients accounted for more than half (53.6%, n = 216) of the study participants. The mean (± SD) age of the participants was 8.04 (± 3.40) years, ranging from 5 to 16 years. Within this age group, the most commonly affected age was 5 years (41.2%, n = 166). More than three-fourth of the study participants (77.9%, n = 314) lived in urban areas. Among the caregivers, 63.3%, (n = 255) were mothers. Regards to educational level, nearly half of the study participants (46.7%, n = 188) and caregivers (49.9%, n = 201) were attending preschool and higher education, respectively. Of the total, 39.5% ( n = 159) of the caregivers were government employees and 36.5% (n = 147) caregivers earned a monthly income of ≥ 5001 birrs (Table 1).

Table 1 Socio-demographic characteristics of AD patients attending at ALERT comprehensive specialized hospital, dermatovenerology unit, addis Ababa, Ethiopia, from September 01, 2022 to February 28, 2023 (n = 403)
Full size table

Clinical characteristics of study participants

As depicted in Table 2, the mean (± SD) age of study participants at the time of AD diagnosis was 4.79 (± 3.85) years with ages ranging from 1 to 16 years. Nearly half (49.1%, n = 198) of the AD diseases occurred at a mid-onset (beginning at 3–7 years) and the three-fourths (76.4%, n = 308) of cases of AD had a duration of less than 5 years. The majority (84.6%, n = 341) of had the pure AD, (37.5%, n = 75) had the sub-acute type, and 71.7% (n = 289) had non-lesion type of AD. Regarding disease severity, more than half (57.6%, n = 232) had moderate AD. Moreover, concerning to the affected body parts, 45.2% (n = 182) of AD patients had mixed body site involvement which was the most predominantly affected sites.

Table 2 Clinical characteristics of AD patients on observation at ALERT comprehensive specialized hospital, dermatovenerology unit, addis Ababa, Ethiopia, from September 01, 2022 to February 28, 2023 (n = 403)
Full size table

In Table 2, a positive family history of atopy was reported in 27.8% (n = 112) of the participants’ parents. Nearly one-third (30%, n = 121) had a family history of bronchial asthma. The majority (83.1%, n = 335) of participants and caregivers (80.1%, n = 323) had no history of medical illness at the time of presentation (Table 2).

Atopic dermatitis treatment approach

Table 3 shows the Atopic dermatitis treatment approach of the study participants. More than half (55.6%, n = 224) of participants used topically applied non- compounded medicine, while the remaining participants (44%, 179) used topically applied compounded medicine. Out of users of topically applied non-compounded medicine, a total of 34.2% (n = 138) used it with emollients, and 7.9% (n = 32) used it without emollients. Among the users of topically applied non-compounded medicine, nearly half (49.4%, n = 199) used topical corticosteroids and a small number (6.2%, n = 25) were used topical calcineurin inhibitor. Mometasone furoate was the most frequently utilized topical corticosteroid (26.8%, n = 108) (Fig. 2).

Table 3 Anti-atopic dermatitis treatment pattern of AD patients on attending at ALERT comprehensive specialized hospital, dermatovenerology unit, addis Ababa, Ethiopia, from September 01, 2022 to February 28, 2023 (n = 403)
Full size table
Fig. 2
figure 2

Topically applied non-compounded medicine among AD patient attending at ALERT comprehensive specialized hospital, Dermatovenerology Unit, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, from September 01, 2022 to February 28, 2023 (n = 403)

Full size image

Regarding the topically applied compounded medicine, salicylic acid with betamethasone (15.6%, n = 63) was the most commonly prescribed treatment approach while the least often prescribed treatment approach was urea with betamethasone and salicylic acid with clobetasol, each accounting for 0.2% of participants.

Systemic antihistamine therapy along with other treatment modalities was prescribed for 24.4% ( n = 98) of study participants as reported in Table 3. Among these treatment approaches, second generation antihistamine medications, including Loratadine (8.9%, n = 36), Desloratadine (8.7%, n = 35), and Cetirizine (6.0%, n = 24) were the most often prescribed systemic treatment modalities, while chlorpheniramine (0.7%, n = 3) was the least utilized.

Of the total participants, three-quarters (75.8%, n = 305) were prescribed emollients. Out of those who received emollients, half of the study participants were prescribed paraffin-based emollient (53.3%, n = 215), liquid paraffin (19.1%, n = 77), white soft paraffin (1.0%, n = 4), and other types of emollients with different dosage forms were prescribed for 2.2% (n = 9) of study participants.

Health related quality of life domains

The overall mean (± SD) score of CDLQI was 8.42 (± 3.57) out of 30. 62% (n = 248) of study participants experienced a moderate effect, while only 2% (n = 7) had an extremely large effect. This signifies that children with AD had a moderate effect on their QoL (Fig. 3). The current study’s findings showed that the Q1 domain (itchy, scratchy, sore or painful) had the highest impact on QoL, with a mean (± SD) score of 1.83 (± 0.78) out of 3. Three-fifths of participants (40.7%) reported that their QoL impact was “only a little”, while 35.7% reported it was “quite a lot”. Conversely, the Q6 domain (avoided swimming or other sports activities) showed the lowest QoL impact with a mean score of 0.27 (± 0.48), and the highest percentage (74.2%) of study participants indicated that its QoL impact was “Not at all”. Similarly, the impact of AD on the Q8 domain (teasing /bullying) recorded the lowest score, with a mean score of 0.35 (± 0.50) out of 3. More than three-fifths (65.5%) of study participants indicated that their QoL impact was “Not at all “. In comparison, the highest percentage (37.2%) of study participants described that having AD had only a little impact on the Q4 domain (dressing clothes/shoes), with a mean (± SD) score of 1.76 (± 0.92). Similar results were observed regarding the impact on sleeping. Nearly half (51.4%) of the study participants reported that their QoL impact was “only a little” with a mean score of 1.47 (± 0.84). These data, along with the remaining question scores and percentages are shown in Table 4.

Fig. 3
figure 3

The overall effect of CDLQI distribution among AD patient attending at ALERT comprehensive specialized hospital, Dermatovenerology Unit, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, from September 01, 2022 to February 28, 2023 (n = 403)

Full size image
Table 4 Mean and response rate of CDLQI score among AD patient attending at ALERT comprehensive specialized hospital, dermatovenerology unit, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, from September 01, 2022 to February 28, 2023 (n = 403)
Full size table

AD symptoms pattern and improvement statues

According to the Hanifin & Rajka diagnostic criteria, all study participants were assessed for symptoms of pruritis. Localized pruritus (75.7%, n = 305) was the most commonly observed symptom, followed by generalized pruritus (24.3%, n = 98). According to the severity of AD-related pruritus, acute and chronic types were observed in 49.4% (n = 199) and 50.6% (n = 204) of study participants, respectively. Dry skin (70.7%, n = 285) and inflamed skin (6.5%, n = 26) were also observed at the initial presentation (Fig. 4). After a 4-week treatment observation period, 76.9% (n = 310) of study participants had their AD related symptoms controlled, while 23.1% experienced uncontrolled AD symptoms.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Observed AD symptoms pattern among AD patient attending at ALERT comprehensive specialized hospital, Dermatovenerology Unit, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, from September 01, 2022 to February 31, 2023 (n = 403)

Full size image

Factors associated with quality of life

Bivariate logistic analysis revealed that caregiver educational level, job level, monthly income, AD classification and severity, affected body site, types of medicine use, pruritus distribution and severity have all passed with a p- value < 0.25 to the multivariable logistic regression analysis model. Variables such as being a government employee, daily laborer, having a low, very low and above average monthly income, moderate AD and facial involvement were declared statistically significant at P < 0.05 in association with QoL. The likelihood of having poor QoL among government workers [AOR = 4.9, 95% CI: 1.22, 19.71, P = 0.02] and daily laborers [AOR = 7.3, 95% CI: 1.15, 45.7, P = 0.03] were 4.9 and 7.3 times higher compared to housewives, respectively. Caregivers who earned very low (≤ 860 birr) [AOR = 0.09, 95% CI: 0.01, 0.68, P = 0.02], low (861–1500 birr) [AOR = 0.20, 95% CI: 0.05, 0.90, P = 0.03] and above average (3001–5000 birr) [AOR = 0.18, 95% CI: 0.04, 0.75, P = 0.03] were less likely to have poor quality of life compared to those who were highly paid (> 5001 birr). Patients with moderate AD [AOR = 2.8, 95% CI: 1.59, 4.96, P = < 0.001] had, on average, 2.8 times lower quality of life compared to those with mild AD (Table 5).

Table 5 Factors associated with QoL among AD patient attending at A.L.E.R.T comprehensive specialized hospital, dermatovenerology unit, addis Ababa, Ethiopia, from September 01, 2022 to February 31, 2023 (n = 403)
Full size table

Discussion

This observational study, conducted in aspecialized dermatology setting, provides information on the quality of life, treatment practices, status of AD symptom control, and associated factors among children with AD using the validated CDLQI instrument. The study revealed that, the total mean (± SD) CDLQI score was 8.44(± 4.20), indicating a moderate impact on patients’ QoL. This finding is consistent with studies conducted in Thailand 7.5 [24], China 7.7 [25], Malaysia 8.0 [26], Singapore 8.5 [27], Turkey 8.97 [28], Iran 9.44 [29], and Ivory Coast 9.9 [30]. Furthermore, our results are also consistent with a meta-analysis conducted by Olsen et al. [31]. Conversely, our finding was lower than the study done in Serbia, which found an average of 17.11, indicating a very large effect [20]. One potential explanation may be that the current study included all AD patients, while in Serbia, only patients with moderate to severe forms of AD were included. On the other hand, our finding was higher than that of studies done in Brazil 5.4 [32], the USA 5.8 [33], and Korea 6.6, indicating to small effects. One reason for this discrepancy could be that the number of study participants in Brazil and Korea was small and only mild to moderate participants were enrolled in the USA. Another possible reason for the discrepancy might be the limited accessibility of dermatology centers, dermatology experts, essential medicines, and devices for AD diagnosis and care in our context [14].

As per the domain of the CDLQI questionnaire, 72% of the study participants found that AD had a considerable impact on their QoL. Of those, 62% experienced a moderate effect, 8% a very large effect and 2% an extreme very large effect.This finding is consistent with a study done in Brazil, where 72% of participants were affected (38% with a moderate effect, 34% with a large effect) [34], and in Iran, where 65% of participants were affected (38% with a moderate effect, 27% with a large effect) [29].

When it comes to the CDLQI sub scale responses, different studies have reported varying results. The majority of studies have showed that feelings and educational activities were the most and least reported sub scales, respectively [35]. In this study, the highest reported CDLQI subscales were feelings and sleeping problems. However, disturbances in swimming/sports activities were the least affected CDLQI components. This result is in line with studies done in Iran [29] and Malaysia [26].

Different types of medicated and non-medicate therapeutic approaches were prescribed for the management of AD. Emollient therapy is a cornerstone for the management and prevention of AD [36]. In this study, two- thirds (78.9%, n = 318) of the study participants were found to be prescribed emollient therapy along with other therapeutic approaches. This finding was higher than that of a study done in Brazil (56.9%) [32].This discrepancy might be due to the fact that two third of the current study participants had dryness and crusted skin.

Regarding the pharmacological therapeutic approach, more than half (55.6%) of the study subjects utilized topically applied non compounded medicine. Of this therapeutic approach, almost half (49.4%) of the study participants were prescribed topical steroids. This finding is in line with observational studies done in Italy (45.7%) [37], Egypt (45.9) [38] and Brazil (51%) [32]. This is due to the fact that topical steroids are the first line therapeutic approach for both adults and children to treat inflammatory symptoms, acute flares and pruritus symptoms of AD [39].

Extemporaneous compounding of medicine is a commonly utilized therapeutic approach for paediatric dermatological patients in developing countries [40]. Evidence has showed that compounding corticosteroids with emollients is an effective treatment modality for paediatrics AD [41]. Our study revealed that the most common and least prescribed topical compounded medicines contained salicylic acid with corticosteroids (15.6%, n = 63) and urea with corticosteroids (0.2%, n = 1), respectively. This might be because both salicylic acid and urea have penetration enhancing and water retaining effects, which influence the skin’s pH and enhance the effectiveness of topically administered steroid medication [42]. In addition, prescribing compounded medicine plays an important role in managing chronic and unresponsive cases of AD [43]. Antihistamines are frequently prescribed to manage AD related pruritus symptoms and improve patient sleep quality [44]. In this study, second generation antihistamines were prescribed for 17.6% (n = 71) of study participants. This finding is consistent with a retrospective study done in the USA (19.9%) [45] and a cross-sectional study conducted in Brazil (21.6) [32].

In this study, 71.9% (n = 310) of study participants had their AD symptoms controlled with different types of anti- AD treatment approaches. This finding closely aligns with a retrospective study done in Korea ( 70.6%) [46]. However, a 6 month prospective study and multicenter retrospective analysis in Japan [47, 48] showed that the rate of AD symptom control among children using topical corticosteroids and emollients was 52% and 40%, respectively. This discrepancy may be due attributed to the use of different therapeutic approaches. In our research, a variety of treatment approaches were utilized, while the study in Japan focused solely on topically applied corticosteroids. Another reasons for the differences may be the characteristics of the study participants such as avoidance of triggering factors, compliance status, and the dosage form in which the corticosteroids are delivered.

Identifying of possible indicators of poor QoL in children with AD is crucial for comprehending the whole picture of the disease and developing effective monitoring strategies. In this study, multivariable analysis demonstrated that caregiver employment status (government employee and daily laborer) were independent factors associated with poor QoL compared to house wives. This finding was supported by study in Nigeria [49]. Nevertheless, it contradicts a study conducted in Singapore [50, 51]. The differences observed may be attributed to variations in socioeconomic status, caregiver life style and QoL measurement.

According to this study, having moderate AD was found to be an independent factor for having a poorer QoL than mild AD. This finding is consistent with studies conducted in Singapore and Thailand [50, 52], which suggest that moderate to severe AD patients experience sleep deprivation and marked pruritus.

We found that caregivers with low, very low and above average monthly income were less likely to have a poorer quality of life as compared to highly paid caregiver. This is in line with a study done in Nigeria [49]. Indicating that the QoL of children is associated with family socio-economic status. Caregivers who earn low monthly incomes may have a greater financial burden in covering the expenses of medical care. Consequently, when creating a treatment strategy for children with AD and enhancing their QoL, particular attention must be paid to families from low-income households. Aside from the above associated variables, our study did not find any age related, clinical related or treatment related factors association with QoL. However, a study done in Singapore revealed that older children are associated with poor QoL [50]. This discrepancy may be linked to adjustments in confounding variables, variations in sample size and differences in participant age groups.

This study has several strengths. The large sample size provides a good representation of children with atopic dermatitis in Ethiopia. To the best of our knowledge, this is one of the first studies on the QoL in children with atopic dermatitis. However, it also has a few limitations. Firstly, the study was conducted at a single specialized dermatology center, which may limit the generalizability of the findings to other settings or populations. Secondly, the study was unable to compare the QoL of children with atopic dermatitis to that of children without the condition. Thirdly, there is a possibility of information bias during data collection on QoL, as it was reported by a proxy (parent/ caregiver). Therefore, future multicenter and follow-up studies are needed to reassess our findings in a larger cohort of patients.

Conclusions

The finding of this study indicate that AD has moderate effects on children’s quality of life. Among the CDLQI domains, the feeling of itching and scratching, dressing problems and sleeping problems were the most affected. However, disturbances in swimming/sports activities were the least affected components of the CDLQI. Symptom control for AD was observed in three-fourths of the study participants after 4 weeks of treatment. Caregiver employment status, caregiver monthly income, moderate types of AD, and facial involvement were significantly associated with QoL outcomes.

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Abbreviations

AAD:

American Academy of Dermatology

AD:

Atopic dermatitis

ALERT:

All Africa Leprosy, Tuberculosis and Rehabilitation Training

AOR:

Adjusted Odds Ratio

CDLQI:

Child dermatology life quality index

HRQoL:

Health related quality of life

MRN:

Medical record number

NICU:

Neonatal intensive care unit

QoL:

Quality of life

SCORAD:

Scoring atopic dermatitis

SPSS:

Statistical Package for Social Sciences

References

  1. Fleming P, Yang YB, Lynde C, O’Neill B, Lee KO. Diagnosis and management of atopic dermatitis for primary care providers. J Am Board Family Med. 2020;33(4):626–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Krakowski AC, Eichenfield LF, Dohil MA. Management of atopic dermatitis in the pediatric population. Pediatrics. 2008;122(4):812–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Correale CE, Walker C, Murphy L, Craig TJ. Atopic dermatitis: a review of diagnosis and treatment. Am Family Phys. 1999;60(4):1191.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Giam YC, Hebert AA, Dizon MV, Van Bever H, Tiongco-Recto M, Kim K-H, Soebono H, Munasir Z, Diana IA, Luk DCK. A review on the role of moisturizers for atopic dermatitis. Asia Pac Allergy. 2016;6(2):120–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Laughter M, Maymone M, Mashayekhi S, Arents B, Karimkhani C, Langan S, Dellavalle R, Flohr C. The global burden of atopic dermatitis: lessons from the global burden of disease study 1990–2017. Br J Dermatol. 2021;184(2):304–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Nutten S. Atopic dermatitis: global epidemiology and risk factors. Annals Nutr Metabolism. 2015;66(Suppl 1):8–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Sendrasoa F, Ranaivo I, Razanakoto N, Andrianarison M, Raharolahy O, Ratovonjanahary V, Sata M, Rakotoarisaona M, Ramarozatovo L, Rapelanoro Rabenja F. Epidemiology and associated factors of atopic dermatitis in Malagasy children. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2020;16(1):1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Thomsen SF. Atopic dermatitis: natural history, diagnosis, and treatment. Int Sch Res Notices. 2014;2014

  9. Nygaard U, Deleuran M, Vestergaard C. Emerging treatment options in atopic dermatitis: topical therapies. Dermatology. 2017;233(5):333–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lifschitz C. The impact of atopic dermatitis on quality of life. Annals Nutr Metabolism. 2015;66(Suppl 1):34–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bruin-Weller Md, Pink AE, Patrizi A, Gimenez-Arnau AM, Agner T, Roquet-Gravy P-P, Ferrucci SM, Arenberger P, Svensson A, Schuttelaar ML. Disease burden and treatment history among adults with atopic dermatitis receiving systemic therapy: baseline characteristics of participants on the EUROSTAD prospective observational study. J Dermatological Treat. 2021;32(2):164–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wei W, Ghorayeb E, Andria M, Walker V, Schnitzer J, Kennedy M, Chen Z, Belland A, White J, Silverberg JI. A real-world study evaluating adequacy of existing systemic treatments for patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (QUEST-AD): baseline treatment patterns and unmet needs assessment. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2019;123(4):381–8. e382.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Torrelo A. Atopic dermatitis in different skin types. What is to know? J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2014;28:2–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Al-Afif KAM, Buraik MA, Buddenkotte J, Mounir M, Gerber R, Ahmed HM, Tallman AM, Steinhoff M. Understanding the burden of atopic dermatitis in Africa and the middle East. Dermatology Therapy. 2019;9(2):223–41.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Schmidt SAJ, Mailhac A, Darvalics B, Mulick A, Deleuran MS, Sørensen HT, Riis JL, Langan SM. Association between atopic dermatitis and educational attainment in Denmark. JAMA Dermatology. 2021;157(6):667–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Marron S, Cebrian-Rodriguez J, Alcalde-Herrero V, de Aranibar FG-L, Tomas-Aragones L. Psychosocial impact of atopic dermatitis in adults: a qualitative study. Actas Dermo-Sifiliográficas (English Edition). 2020;111(6):513–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Drucker AM, Wang AR, Li W-Q, Sevetson E, Block JK, Qureshi AA. The burden of atopic dermatitis: summary of a report for the National eczema association. J Invest Dermatology. 2017;137(1):26–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kaufman BP, Guttman-Yassky E, Alexis AF. Atopic dermatitis in diverse Racial and ethnic groups—variations in epidemiology, genetics, clinical presentation and treatment. Exp Dermatol. 2018;27(4):340–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. university C: Children’s Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI). In.; 1995.

  20. Ražnatović Đurović M, Janković J, Tomić Spirić V, Relić M, Sojević Timotijević Z, Ćirković A, Đurić S, Janković S. Does age influence the quality of life in children with atopic dermatitis? PLoS ONE. 2019;14(11):e0224618.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Puddicombe O, Odusote O, Lesi F, Ayanlowo A. Impact of atopic dermatitis on the quality of life of Nigerian children: A hospital-based cross-sectional study. South Afr J Child Health. 2018;12(4):137–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mohta A, Singh A, Nyati A, Agrawal A, Nahar D, Lal M, Gupta D, Jain SK. Evaluation of impact of Tinea capitis on quality of life in pediatric patients using children’s dermatology life quality index and its correlation with disease duration. Int J Trichology. 2020;12(5):213.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Sur M, Boca AN, Ilies RF, Floca E, Tataru A, Sur L. Correlation between quality of life and disease severity of pediatric patients with atopic dermatitis. Experimental Therapeutic Med. 2020;20(6):1–1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wisuthsarewong W, Nitiyarom R, Ngamcherdtrakul P. The validity and reliability of the Thai version of children’s dermatology life quality index (CDLQI). J Med Assoc Thai. 2015;98(10):968–73.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Chuh AA. Validation of a Cantonese version of the children’s dermatology life quality index. Pediatr Dermatol. 2003;20(6):479–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ghani AAA, Noor NM, Muhamad R, Ismail Z. Quality of life and its associated factors among children with atopic eczema in Kelantan, Malaysia. Int J Collaborative Res Intern Med Public Health. 2012;4(11):0–0.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ho RC, Giam Y, Ng T, Mak A, Goh D, Zhang MW, Cheak A, Van Bever HP. The influence of childhood atopic dermatitis on health of mothers, and its impact on Asian families. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2010;21(3):501–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Balcı DD, Sangün Ö, İnandı T. Cross validation of the Turkish version of children’s dermatology life quality index. J Turk Acad Dermatol. 2007;1(4):71402a.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Mohammadi S, Khalili M, Farajzadeh S, Safizadeh H, Amiri R, Aflatoonian M, Shahabi S. Evaluation of reliability and validity of Persian version of children’s dermatology life quality index (CDLQI) questionnaire and practical use. J Skin Stem Cell. 2020; 7(4).

  30. Kouassi YI, Ahogo K, Bia O, Kouassi K, Kourouma H, Allou A, Gbandama K, Kassi K, Ecra E, Kaloga M. Assessment of the quality of life of African black children with atopic dermatitis by the CDLQI score. J Portuguese Soc Dermatology Venereol. 2021;79(1):33–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Olsen JR, Gallacher J, Finlay AY, Piguet V, Francis NA. Quality of life impact of childhood skin conditions measured using the children’s dermatology life quality index (CDLQI): a meta-analysis. Br J Dermatol. 2016;174(4):853–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Campos ALB, Araújo FMd S, MALd S, AdASd, Pires CAA. Impact of atopic dermatitis on the quality of life of pediatric patients and their guardians. Revista Paulista De Pediatria. 2017;35:05–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Fivenson D. The effect of atopic dermatitis on total burden of illness and quality of life on adults and children in a large managed care organization. J Managed Care Pharm. 2002;8(5):333–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Amaral CSFd M, MdFBP, Sant’Anna CC. Quality of life in children and teenagers with atopic dermatitis. An Bras Dermatol. 2012;87:717–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Salek M, Jung S, Brincat-Ruffini L, MacFarlane L, Lewis‐Jones M, Basra M, Finlay AY. Clinical experience and psychometric properties of the children’s dermatology life quality index (CDLQI), 1995–2012. Br J Dermatol. 2013;169(4):734–59.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Dhadwal G, Albrecht L, Gniadecki R, Poulin Y, Yeung J, Hong C-h, Gooderham MJ. Approach to the assessment and management of adult patients with atopic dermatitis: a consensus document. Section IV: treatment options for the management of atopic dermatitis. J Cutan Med Surg. 2018;22(1suppl):S21–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Geat D, Giovannini M, Barlocco G, Pertile R, Pace M, Mori F, Novembre E, Girolomoni G, Cristofolini M, Baldo E. Assessing patients’ characteristics and treatment patterns among children with atopic dermatitis. Ital J Pediatr. 2021;47(1):1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Hossny EM, Shousha GA, Wassif GO, Hana SM. A study of health-related quality of life in pediatric atopic dermatitis. Egypt J Pediatr Allergy Immunol (The). 2020;18(2):61–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Maliyar K, Sibbald C, Pope E, Sibbald RG. Diagnosis and management of atopic dermatitis: a review. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2018;31(12):538–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Yuliani SH, Putri DCA, Virginia DM, Gani MR, Riswanto FDO. Prevalence, risk, and challenges of extemporaneous Preparation for pediatric patients in developing nations: A review. Pharmaceutics. 2023;15(3):840.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Eichenfield LF, Hanifin JM, Luger TA, Stevens SR, Pride HB. Consensus conference on pediatric atopic dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2003;49(6):1088–95.

  42. Van Vloten W. Therapeutic implications of corticosteroid formulations. J Dermatological Treat. 1990;1(sup3):S11–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Beebeejaun M, Brown M, Hutter V, Kravitz L, McAuley W. The effect of Dilution of fusidic acid cream and betamethasone dipropionate cream in complex extemporaneous mixes on formulation performance. Int J Pharm. 2022;624:121988.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Langeland T, Fagertun H, Larsen S. Therapeutic effect of Loratadine on pruritus in patients with atopic dermatitis: A multi-crossover‐designed study. Allergy. 1994;49(1):22–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Anderson P, Austin J, Lofland JH, Piercy J, Joish VN. Inadequate disease control, treatment dissatisfaction, and quality-of-life impairments among US patients receiving topical therapy for atopic dermatitis. Dermatology Therapy. 2021;11(5):1571–85.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Chung Y, Kwon JH, Kim J, Han Y, Lee S-I, Ahn K. Retrospective analysis of the natural history of atopic dermatitis occurring in the first year of life in Korean children. J Korean Med Sci. 2012;27(7):723–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Fukaya M, Sato K, Yamada T, Sato M, Fujisawa S, Minaguchi S, Kimata H, Dozono H. A prospective study of atopic dermatitis managed without topical corticosteroids for a 6-month period. Clin Cosmet Invest Dermatology 2016:151–8.

  48. Furue M, Terao H, Rikihisa W, Urabe K, Kinukawa N, Nose Y, Koga T. Clinical dose and adverse effects of topical steroids in daily management of atopic dermatitis. Br J Dermatol. 2003;148(1):128–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Kayode OB, Mokoatle CM, Rathebe PC, Mbonane TP. Factors Associated with Atopic Dermatitis among Children Aged 6 to 14 Years in Alimosho Local Government, Lagos, Nigeria. Children. 2023; 10(5):893.

  50. Xu X, van Galen LS, Koh MJA, Bajpai R, Thng S, Yew YW, Ho VPY, Alagappan U, Järbrink KSA, Car J. Factors influencing quality of life in children with atopic dermatitis and their caregivers: a cross-sectional study. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Xu X, Olsson M, Bajpai R, Aan MKJ, Yew YW, Wong S, Foong A, Thng S, Järbrink K, Car J. Concordance between physician-rated and caregiver-perceived disease severity in children with atopic dermatitis: a cross-sectional study. Acta Dermato-Venereologica. 2020;100(18):1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Wisuthsarewong W, Nitiyarom R, Boonpuen N. Childhood atopic dermatitis: impact on quality of life in Thai children and their families. Astrocyte. 2017;4(3):144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge ALERT comprehensive specialized hospital for allowing us to conduct this study. In addition, I would like to thank Professor Andrew Y Finlay for allowing us to validate and use the Amharic version of CDLQI questionnaire. The authors also would like to acknowledge all participants, data collectors and ALERT comprehensive specialized hospital dermatovenerology unit staffs for their voluntary help in the data collection process.

Funding

The study was done with the financial support of Addis Ababa University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

    Minychel Wale Aynalem & Alemseged Beyene Berha

Authors
  1. Minychel Wale Aynalem
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alemseged Beyene Berha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

H.T designed and conducted the study, analyzed and interpreted results and drafted the manuscript. A.B.B were contributed to conception and design of the study, analysis, interpretation, supervision, drafting the manuscript and its critical review. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript to be published.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alemseged Beyene Berha.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval was received from the Ethical Review Board of the School of Pharmacy, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, (Ref.no; ERB/SOP/479/14/2022). Permission was also obtained from ALERT Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, Dermatovenerology unit with Ref.No 10.015.1/Po-56.22. In addition, informed consent was obtained from the caregiver and study participants. For the sake of anonymity, the participant’s name and medical record number were not used during data collection, and all other personnel information was kept entirely secret throughout the study period.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aynalem, M.W., Berha, A.B. Assessment of quality of life, treatment practices, and associated factors among children of atopic dermatitis patients at all Africa leprosy, TB and rehabilitation training center (A.L.E.R.T): a prospective observational study. BMC Pediatr 25, 241 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-025-05616-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-025-05616-6

Keywords

BMC Pediatrics

ISSN: 1471-2431

Contact us