Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

A cross-national perspective of migration and cancer: incidence of five major cancer types among resettlers from the former Soviet Union in Germany and ethnic Germans in Russia

BMC Cancer volume 19, Article number: 869 (2019) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Few studies compared cancer incidence among migrants both to their host countries and to their population of origin. We aimed to compare cancer incidence of ethnic Germans who migrated from the former Soviet Union to Germany (resettlers) to those living in Russia as well as to the German and the Russian general populations.

Methods

The cancer registry of North Rhine-Westphalia identified incident cases of stomach, colorectal, lung, breast and prostate cancer in resettlers and the general population of the administrative district of Münster (Germany) between 2004 and 2013. The Tomsk cancer registry collected the same data in ethnic Germans and the general population of the Tomsk region (Russia). We used standardised incidence rate ratios (SIRs) to compare rates of resettlers and ethnic Germans with the respective general populations.

Results

The total number of person-years under risk was 83,289 for ethnic Germans, 8,006,775 for the population of Tomsk, 219,604 for resettlers, and 20,516,782 for the population of Münster. Incidence of the five investigated cancer types among ethnic Germans did not differ from incidence of the general population of Tomsk. Compared to the general population of Tomsk, incidence among resettlers was higher for colorectal cancer in both sexes (females: SIR 1.45 [95% CI 1.14–1.83], males: SIR 1.56 [95% CI 1.23–1.97]), breast cancer in females (SIR 1.65 [95% CI 1.40–1.95]), and prostate cancer (SIR 1.64 [95% CI 1.34–2.01]). Incidence rates of these cancer types among resettlers were more similar to rates of the general population of Münster. Incidence of stomach and lung cancer did not differ between resettlers and the general population of Tomsk.

Conclusions

After an average stay of 15 years, we observed that incidence of colorectal, breast and prostate cancer among resettlers converged to levels of the general population of Münster. Resettler’s incidence of stomach and lung cancer, however, was comparable to incidence in their population of origin. Causes must be investigated in subsequent analytical studies.

Peer Review reports

Background

After guest workers who immigrated to Germany mainly from Italy and Turkey, ethnic German resettlers were the second largest migrant group in Germany in 2017 with around 2.9 million people [1]. Their majority immigrated in the early 1990s from countries of the former Soviet Union with very few formal restrictions [2]. With subsequent introduction of legal restrictions, numbers of immigrants decreased rapidly from 1995 onwards [2, 3]. In 2017, immigration numbers of resettlers in Germany increased for the first time since 2001 with a total of 7000 new registrations [4]. To date, about 400,000 people considering themselves as ethnic Germans still live in Russia according to the 2010 census of the Russian Federation [5]. It had been hypothesised that resettlers imported a high burden of cardiovascular diseases and cancer due to a high exposure to risk factors and low socioeconomic status in countries of the former Soviet Union [6]. Regarding cancer, this hypothesis was not confirmed, when studies found that overall cancer mortality among male resettlers was similar compared to the general German population, and lower among female resettlers. However, mortality ratios showed site-specific cancer differences [7]. Focusing on cancer incidence in comparison to the respective regional populations in Germany, female resettlers had lowered overall, colorectal, lung and breast cancer incidence, while male resettlers showed lowered overall and prostate cancer incidence, but elevated stomach cancer incidence [8, 9]. Furthermore, overall cancer incidence converged since 1994 reaching levels of the general German population in 2013 [8]. Finally, higher odds of having an advanced tumour stage at diagnosis among resettlers compared to the general population are in line with findings of lower health care utilisation of this minority group [8, 10,11,12].

Of all cancer types, incidence rates in Russia in 2018 were highest for breast cancer among females and lung cancer among males, while in Germany breast cancer showed the highest incidence among females and prostate cancer among males [13]. For all cancer types combined, age-adjusted incidence increased globally between 1990 and 2015, however, more rapidly in Germany compared to Russia [14]. In both Russia and Germany in 2018, mortality rates were highest for lung cancer among males and breast cancer among females [15].

The observation of cancer incidence trends among migrant populations is a unique opportunity to add evidence to our understanding of cancer aetiology [16]. Although reasons of changes in cancer incidence rates among migrant populations are poorly understood, past analyses have highlighted the importance of the changing physical and social environment on cancer risk [17]. A summary of cancer incidence among non-western migrants in Europe demonstrated that most migrant populations show lower overall cancer incidence, higher incidence of cervical and stomach cancer and lower incidence of colorectal, breast and prostate cancer compared to general populations of their host countries [18].

Several hypotheses have been proposed to explain migrant’s overall favourable health, which has been extensively documented using mortality data [19]. The widely cited healthy migrant effect assumes that only healthy people migrate and, hence, the migration process describes a form of selection phenomenon. Others have argued that migrants might return to their countries of origin when they fall ill (salmon effect), that living in segregated communities protects from health deterioration (ethnic enclave hypothesis), or that migrants profit from immediate effects of a better healthcare system in the destination country (health transition hypothesis) [20]. Convergence theory states that interaction of migrants with the host population leads to an adoption of health-related behaviours and consequently migrant’s health profile converges to that of the host population [20].

It is evident that the majority of studies on migration and health have put findings in context with the new host population. Comparisons to countries of origin or to the specific populations of origin are scarce. A framework of migrant’s health, which has been derived from the sociological literature suggests intensifying cross-national research in public health in order to understand the health of migrant populations as a result of health in both sending and receiving countries [21].

To our knowledge, there is no study investigating any health outcome among ethnic Germans in Russia, or comparing health outcomes cross-nationally between ethnic Germans that remained in Russia, resettlers in Germany and the corresponding majority populations of both countries.

Methods

The aim of this study was to apply a cross-national framework to compare cancer incidence of five major cancer sites among resettlers living in the administrative district (AD) of Münster in Germany to ethnic Germans living in the region of Tomsk (Tomsk Oblast) in Russia and to both regional general populations.

Cancer cases and population data of resettlers and the general population of the AD Münster

Cancer incidence of resettlers in Germany was determined in a historical registry-based cohort called the AMIN-study [8]. The AMIN-cohort of 32,972 resettlers from countries of the former Soviet Union who immigrated to the AD Münster between 1990 and 2001 was set up by identifying resettlers in historical immigration records of the registry offices in local municipalities. The sample can be considered representative of all resettlers in the AD Münster including 52.9% of resettlers who were originally registered in this region. Incident cancer cases of the AMIN-study were identified by the federal cancer registry of North Rhine-Westphalia (NRW) based on a pseudonymised record linkage [22, 23]. Encrypted personal identifiers of each cohort member were used to identify incident cases of resettlers [8]. Person time at risk of resettlers was approximated using date of immigration and date of diagnosis or the 31st of December 2013 as end of follow-up while estimating mortality and out-migration from a previous cohort study [24].

The NRW cancer registry also provided cancer cases and yearly midyear population figures of the general population of the AD Münster, therefore, cancer incidence rates of the general population of Münster could be estimated.

Cancer cases and population data of ethnic Germans and the general population of the Tomsk Oblast

To date, about 10,000 ethnic Germans reside in the Tomsk Oblast, Russia [5]. The Tomsk cancer registry collects information on self-reported nationality for each cancer diagnosis. The variable self-reported nationality contained no missing data. Based on this information all cancer diagnoses of ethnic Germans were extracted from the registry.

To estimate person time at risk of ethnic Germans, we used population figures of the Russian population census, which reported German ethnicity based on the self-reported categories “German”, “German Mennonite”, and “other German”, where “Mennonite” refers to German members of a protestant free church [25]. Age group- and sex-specific population figures of ethnic Germans in Tomsk were available for the years 2002 and 2010 [5, 26]. Midyear population counts for the years 2004 to 2013 were derived by assuming a linear sex- and age group-specific change from 2002 to 2010, which was then extrapolated to 2013. Because we have no data that supports the assumption of a linear trend, three scenarios of population development among ethnic Germans in Tomsk were applied in a sensitivity analysis to examine robustness of results to different assumptions about the population development. The three scenarios considered were a constant mean population, two periods with constant population, and a linear change until 2010 followed by a constant population after 2010.

Age group- and sex-specific incident cancer cases for the general population of the Tomsk Oblast were provided by the Tomsk cancer registry. They also provided the annual age group- and sex-specific midyear population counts.

Processing of cancer registry data

We analysed cancer incidence between 2004 and 2013 for the following sites: stomach (C16.0–9), colorectum (C18.0–21.8), bronchus and lung (C34.0–9), female breast (C50.0–9) and prostate (C61). These are the most common cancer types among resettlers [8]. Information on date of diagnosis, ICD-O-3 M code, sex, and age was provided. We selected only cases with primary malignant behaviour (ICD-O-3 M code, 5th digit: 3), multiple primaries were determined according to rules of the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) (following recommendation 2: “Cancers which occur in any 4th character subcategory of colon (C18) and skin (C44) should be registered as multiple primary cancers.”) [27]. Cases registered on the basis of death certificate only (DCO) were included into analysis.

The datasets of the Münster and Tomsk cancer registry were checked for data validity using the IARC/IACR crg Tool [28]. The tool indicates cases of missing data, unlikely diagnoses, unlikely combinations of tumour characteristics and multiple primary cancers. Two records were removed from the Tomsk dataset; one due to a missing ID and one due to missing age. There were no implausible diagnoses in the data of the Münster cancer registry.

Statistical methods

All statistical analyses except the calculation of directly age-standardised rates were restricted to ages over 20. Age-standardised rates were not restricted to ages over 20 to enable comparisons with routinely reported age-standardised rates. Age group-specific rates were displayed for each cancer site in each population.

We calculated age-standardised rates (ASRs) per 100,000 person-years for the period 2004–2008 and 2009–2013 among the general populations of Tomsk and Münster. Rates were standardised against the old world standard (Segi, modified by Doll) [29]. Standardised incidence rate ratios (SIRs) were calculated for ethnic Germans in Tomsk and resettlers in Germany compared to both standard populations namely the general populations of the AD Münster and of the Tomsk Oblast. To calculate SIRs, age was categorised in 5 year age groups, starting from the age of 20 until the age of 70. Ages over 70 were grouped together, because this age group was only available in aggregated format for ethnic Germans. The expected number of cases was calculated multiplying the sex-, age group- and calendar year-specific person-years (resettlers) or the midyear populations (ethnic Germans, Tomsk) with the respective rates of the standard population. Additionally, the general population of Tomsk was standardised to the Münster general population. Exact 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of SIRs and ASRs were calculated [30, 31]. Analysis was done using R version 3.5.1.

Results

During the study period from 2004 to 2013, annual person-years were on average 8329 among ethnic Germans, 800,678 among the general population of Tomsk, 21,960 among resettlers and 2,051,678 among the general population of Münster. Numbers of cases and person-years stratified by sex and time period are displayed in Table 1.

Table 1 Number of cases and person-years among ethnic Germans, resettlers and the background populations (from age 20)
Full size table

Age-specific rates of lung cancer among female ethnic Germans and female resettlers were similar to the female population of Tomsk (Fig. 1). Breast cancer rates among ethnic Germans were similar to rates of the general population of Tomsk, however, among resettlers, they were similar to rates of the general population of Münster. Male resettlers’ age-specific rates of prostate cancer was in between rates of the general populations of Tomsk and Münster, while those of ethnic German’s were similar to rates in the general population of Tomsk.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Age group-specific rates among ethnic Germans, resettlers and the respective background populations (from age 20)

Full size image

ASRs in females and males of the general population of Tomsk and Münster in the periods of 2004–2008 and 2009–2013 are displayed in Table 2. ASRs of stomach cancer were 24.9 per 100,000 (95% CI 23.1–26.9) among males in Tomsk and 11.4 per 100,000 (95% CI 10.8–12.1) among males in Münster in the period 2009–2013. ASRs of female lung cancer were 8.6 per 100,000 (95% CI 7.7–9.6) in Tomsk and 24.3 per 100,000 (95% CI 23.4–25.3) in Münster in the same period. Finally, the ASR of female breast cancer was 45.9 per 100,000 (95% CI 43.8–48.2) in Tomsk and 93.9 per 100,000 (95% CI 92.0–95.8) in Münster between 2009 and 2013.

Table 2 Age-standardised incidence rates of the populations of Tomsk and Münster (from age 0)
Full size table

There was some evidence that the incidence of colorectal, breast and prostate cancer among resettlers was higher compared to the general population of Tomsk (Table 3). Incidence among ethnic Germans did not differ from incidence in the general population of Tomsk, all 95% CIs included one.

Table 3 Standardised incidence rate ratios of ethnic Germans and resettlers compared to the background populations (from age 20)
Full size table

Compared to the male population of Münster, stomach cancer incidence was elevated among male ethnic Germans from Tomsk, CIs did not include one (Table 3). On the other hand, there was some evidence that incidence of colorectal cancer among both sexes, female lung cancer, breast and prostate cancer among ethnic Germans from Tomsk were lower compared to the general population of Münster. Male resettlers showed evidence for higher incidence of stomach and lung cancer compared to the male population of Münster. Furthermore, incidence of female lung, female breast and prostate cancer was lower among resettlers compared to the Münster general population and CIs did not include one. SIRs did not change considerably when applying the alternative three scenarios of population development among ethnic Germans in Tomsk (see Additional file 1). In all three scenarios, stomach cancer incidence among male ethnic Germans from Tomsk was elevated compared to the male population of Münster. Finally, colorectal cancer among both sexes, female lung cancer, breast and prostate cancer incidence were lower compared to the general population of Münster. All other rates did not differ from the general population of Münster in any scenario.

Discussion

Ethnic Germans in Tomsk showed similar age-standardised incidence of all studied cancer types in comparison to the general population of Tomsk. Approximately 15 years after the migration of ethnic German resettlers from the former Soviet Union to Germany, a transition of cancer incidence was observed [3]. Among resettlers, incidence of colorectal, breast and prostate cancer was more similar to levels of the general population of Münster and differed from incidence among ethnic Germans in Tomsk. Their incidence rates of stomach and lung cancer were comparable to levels found among a population of ethnic Germans in Russia.

The five investigated cancer types comprise a considerable share of cancer burden in both countries. The estimated proportions of incident stomach, colorectal, lung, breast and prostate cancer cases compared to all cancer cases was 52% in Russia and 55% in Germany [32].

Findings of cancer incidence among resettlers in the Münster cohort have reproduced earlier findings among resettlers in the Saarland [9, 33]. Cancer incidence among resettlers furthermore mirrors incidence patterns of cancers of the respiratory system, breast and prostate among Turkish immigrants in Germany and generally non-western migrants in Europe [18, 34]. Spallek and colleagues investigated cancer mortality among Turkish immigrants in Europe from a cross-national point of view [35]. They found that breast and stomach cancer mortality was in between levels of the host countries and Turkey [35]. Causes of mortality rates among Turkish immigrants may, however, differ from resettlers, as for example dietary patterns among adolescent Russian Germans differed from adolescent immigrants from Turkey [36].

Data of the Tomsk cancer registry was recently used in the CONCORD-3 study [37]. Hence, we consider the data quality of the Tomsk cancer registry to be acceptable. Completeness of cancer registration in the AD of Münster is considered to be high since 1994 and further improved since then. In addition, cancer registration became mandatory by law in 2005 [38].

A limitation of this study was the lack of an individual follow-up of ethnic Germans in Tomsk. Therefore, census data were used to approximate rate denominators. Results assuming three alternative scenarios of population development using these census data did not lead to different conclusions. Furthermore, statistical power to detect differences between ethnic Germans and the general populations of Tomsk or Münster was low for rare cancers like stomach cancer and moderate for more frequent types.

Information bias could have occurred, because data on ethnicity was self-reported in the Russian census and the Tomsk cancer registry data. On the other hand, self-reported ethnicity might be an adequate indicator as people strongly identifying themselves as German might be more likely to report a German ethnicity. Finally, incident cancer cases among ethnic Germans in Tomsk might have been under registered because calculated SIRs in comparison to the general population of Tomsk were below 1 for most cancer types.

Considering resettlers in the AD Münster, our estimation method of person time is based on out-migration rates, which are supposed to be higher among younger age groups. Thus, the procedure described in [24] assumes higher loss-to-follow up among young resettlers (< 30 years of age) compared to older ones. As resettlers mostly immigrated in younger ages (mean age: 29.1 years of age), the estimation procedure may have led to an underestimation of person-years of the AMIN-study and therefore, incidence of resettlers might have been overestimated. However, sensitivity analyses showed only slightly deviating results [9].

Finally, incidence rates of breast cancer among resettlers and the general population in the AD Münster are driven by the introduction of the mammography screening programme (MSP) in 2005 [39]. In 2008, an incidence peak was described before rates stabilised again in 2010 [39]. This might have exaggerated differences of breast cancer incidence between populations in Germany and Russia during the study period.

Having these considerations in mind, differences of incidence between resettlers and ethnic Germans in Russia might have been overestimated. However, as differences of SIRs of colorectal and prostate cancer between ethnic Germans in Russia and resettlers in Germany are large, we consider our findings to be robust. Differences of breast cancer incidence, however, might have been driven by the introduction of the MSP in Germany.

The population of origin of resettlers in Germany are ethnic Germans from former Soviet Union countries. We approximated this population by ethnic Germans living in the Tomsk Oblast, Russia. Resettlers living in Germany come mostly from Kazakhstan and Russia [2]. Therefore, the location of Tomsk close to the Kazakh border might be a good approximation of the population of origin of most resettlers. Ethnic Germans in Russia, furthermore, share the same ancestors who emigrated to the Russian empire in the 18th and 19th century. The German minority lived there until around World War One in relatively closed and privileged communities. Thereafter they faced increasing discrimination and were deported to Kazakhstan and Siberia during the 1930s [40]. After the Second World War until 1990, ethnic Germans have been oppressed by the Soviet regime [40].

The migration process observed in this study has some unique features. First, it is a “back-migration” of a population after about 200–300 years. Second, major restrictions during the migration process were absent. In fact, when most resettlers migrated to Germany during the early 1990s, they were invited to Germany [2]. Therefore, the migration process is different from for example work migration, where one would expect a selection towards young and healthy individuals [20].

Early detection programmes for colorectal, breast and prostate cancer, but not for stomach and lung cancer are covered by the statutory health insurance in Germany [41]. In conclusion, we hypothesise that differences in incidence of colorectal, breast and prostate cancer between resettlers and their population of origin might be due to early detection and screening measures which were accessible to resettlers in Germany. Resettlers obtained the German citizenship immediately after immigration [2]. Furthermore, self-rated language proficiency among resettlers was higher compared to other migrant groups in Germany [2]. It is important to stress, however, that our results do not conflict with earlier studies indicating less preferable health seeking behaviour and advanced stage at diagnosis among resettlers compared to the general German population [10, 11].

Our results support the hypothesis that direct exposure to the health care system of the host country might have had immediate effects on cancer incidence of resettlers [20]. An acculturation of behavioural risk factors has been described for smoking among resettlers in Germany [42]. However, we have observed that lung cancer incidence among both female and male resettlers was similar compared to rates in their country of origin. Hence, we hypothesise that changes in lifestyle do not yet impact on cancer incidence rates of resettlers.

Applying a cross-national perspective, our findings support the hypothesis that both the environment in the country of origin and in the country of destination shape the health of migrants [20, 21]. It would be worthwhile to study whether contacts of ethnic Germans in Tomsk to resettlers in Germany influence health of both populations like suggested by the cross-national framework of migration and health [21].

Conclusion

In conclusion, results of our study suggest that incidence rates of cancer types for which measures of early detection were available converged to rates among the general German population. We reproduced the finding that cancer incidence among migrant populations often mirrors states in between the population of origin and the new host population. Future research should determine risk factors of cancer incidence among migrant populations in order to create more solid evidence. Finally, more evidence on cross-national ties of migrant populations is needed in order to investigate international bounds and their effects on health.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from V. Winkler subject to collaboration agreement.

Abbreviations

AD:

administrative district

ASR:

age-standardised rate

CI:

confidence interval

IARC:

International Agency for Research on Cancer

ICD-O M:

International Classification of Diseases for Oncology, morphology code

MSP:

mammography screening programme

NRW:

North Rhine-Westphalia

SIR:

standardised incidence rate ratio

References

  1. Statistisches Bundesamt. Bevölkerung und Erwerbstätigkeit. Bevölkerung mit Migrationshintergrund - Ergebnisse des Mikrozensus 2017. Wiesbaden: Statistisches Bundesamt; 2018.

  2. Worbs S, Bund E, Kohls M. Babka von Gostomski C. (Spät-)Aussiedler in Deutschland, Eine Analyse aktueller Daten und Forschungsergebnisse. Nürnberg: Bundesamt für Migration und Flüchtlinge; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kaucher S, Deckert A, Becher H, Winkler V. Migration pattern and mortality of ethnic German migrants from the former Soviet Union: a cohort study in Germany. BMJ Open. 2017;7(12):e019213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bundesamt für Migration und Flüchtlinge. Migrationsbericht 2016/2017: Zentrale Ergebnisse. Nürnberg; 2019. Available from: http://www.bamf.de/SharedDocs/Anlagen/DE/Publikationen/Migrationsberichte/migrationsbericht-2016-2017-zentrale-ergebnisse.html. Accessed 9 Feb 2019.

  5. Russian Federal Service of State Statistics (Rosstat). Том 4. Национальный состав и владение языками, гражданство. 10. НАСЕЛЕНИЕ НАИБОЛЕЕ МНОГОЧИСЛЕННЫХ НАЦИОНАЛЬНОСТЕЙ ПО ВОЗРАСТНЫМ ГРУППАМ И ПОЛУ ПО СУБЪЕКТАМ РОССИЙСКОЙ ФЕДЕРАЦИИ; 2010. Available from: http://www.gks.ru/free_doc/new_site/perepis2010/croc/perepis_itogi1612.htm. Accessed 13 Dec 2018.

  6. Becher H, Razum O, Kyobutungi C, Laki J, Ronellenfitsch U, Winkler V. Mortality of immigrants from the former Soviet Union: results of a cohort study. Deutsches Ärzteblatt. 2007;104(23):1655–61.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kaucher S, Leier V, Deckert A, Holleczek B, Meisinger C, Winkler V, et al. Time trends of cause-specific mortality among resettlers in Germany, 1990 through 2009. Eur J Epidemiol. 2017;32(4):289–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kaucher S, Kajuter H, Becher H, Winkler V. Cancer incidence and mortality among ethnic German migrants from the former Soviet Union. Front Oncol. 2018;8:378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Winkler V, Holleczek B, Stegmaier C, Becher H. Cancer incidence in ethnic German migrants from the former Soviet Union in comparison to the host population. Cancer Epidemiol. 2014;38(1):22–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cho AB, Jaehn P, Holleczek B, Becher H, Winkler V. Stage of cancer diagnoses among migrants from the former Soviet Union in comparison to the German population - are diagnoses among migrants delayed? BMC Public Health. 2018;18(1):148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Aparicio ML, Doring A, Mielck A, Holle R. Differences between eastern European immigrants of German origin and the rest of the German population in health status, health care use and health behaviour: a comparative study using data from the KORA-survey 2000. Sozial- und Praventivmedizin. 2005;50(2):107–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wittig U, Merbach M, Siefen RG, Brahler E. Complaints and health care system utilisation of ethnic German migrants from the former Soviet Union to Germany and their families. Gesundheitswesen. 2004;66(2):85–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ferlay J, Colombet M, Soerjomataram I, Siegel R, Torre L, Jemal A. Global and regional estimates of the incidence and mortality for 38 cancers: GLOBOCAN 2018. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer/World Health Organization; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fitzmaurice C, Allen C, Barber RM, Barregard L, Bhutta ZA, Brenner H, et al. Global, regional, and national cancer incidence, mortality, years of life lost, years lived with disability, and disability-adjusted life-years for 32 cancer groups, 1990 to 2015: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study. JAMA oncology. 2017;3(4):524–48.

  15. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Parkin DM, Khlat M. Studies of cancer in migrants: rationale and methodology. Eur J Cancer. 1996;32a(5):761–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Maskarinec G, Noh JJ. The effect of migration on cancer incidence among Japanese in Hawaii. Ethn Dis. 2004;14(3):431–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Arnold M, Razum O, Coebergh JW. Cancer risk diversity in non-western migrants to Europe: an overview of the literature. Eur J Cancer. 2010;46(14):2647–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ruiz JM, Steffen P, Smith TB. Hispanic mortality paradox: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the longitudinal literature. Am J Public Health. 2013;103(3):e52–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Namer Y, Razum O. Convergence Theory and the Salmon Effect in Migrant Health. In: Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Global Public Health. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2018.

  21. Acevedo-Garcia D, Sanchez-Vaznaugh EV, Viruell-Fuentes EA, Almeida J. Integrating social epidemiology into immigrant health research: a cross-national framework. Soc Sci Med. 2012;75(12):2060–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kajuter H, Batzler WU, Krieg V, Heidinger O, Hense HW. Linkage of secondary data with cancer registry data on the basis of encrypted personal identifiers - results from a pilot study in North Rhine-Westphalia. Gesundheitswesen. 2012;74(8–9):e84–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Krieg V, Hense HW, Lehnert M, Mattauch V. Record linkage with cryptographic identification data in a population-based cancer registry. Development, implementation and error rates. Gesundheitswesen. 2001;63(6):376–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Becher H, Winkler V. Estimating the standardized incidence ratio (SIR) with incomplete follow-up data. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017;17(1):55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Russian Federal Service of State Statistics (Rosstat). МЕТОДОЛОГИЧЕСКИЕ ПОЯСНЕНИЯ; 2010. Available from: www.gks.ru/free_doc/new_site/perepis2010/croc/Documents/Vol4/metod4.pdf. [Accessed 13 Dec 2018].

  26. Russian Federal Service of State Statistics (Rosstat). Том 4 - "Национальный состав и владение языками, гражданство". 7. НАСЕЛЕНИЕ ОТДЕЛЬНЫХ НАЦИОНАЛЬНОСТЕЙ ПО ВОЗРАСТНЫМ ГРУППАМ И ПОЛУ ПО СУБЪЕКТАМ РОССИЙСКОЙ ФЕДЕРАЦИИ; 2002. Available from: http://www.perepis2002.ru/index.html. Accessed 13 Dec 2018.

  27. IARC/IACR, WHO, ENCR. International Rules for Multiple Primary Cancers (ICD-O 3rd edition). Lyon: IARC; 2004. Available from: http://www.iacr.com.fr/images/doc/MPrules_july2004.pdf. Accessed 13 Dec 2018.

  28. IARC/IACR. IARCcrgTools package. Lyon: IARC; 2017. Available from: http://www.iacr.com.fr/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=134:updated-iarc-iacr-crgtools&catid=80&Itemid=545. Accessed 13 Dec 2018.

  29. Bray F, Ferlay J. Cancer incidence in 5 countries. Vol. 10: Chapter 7: Age standardization. Lyon: IARC; 2018. Available from: http://ci5.iarc.fr/CI5-XI/Pages/Chapter7.aspx. Accessed 13 Dec 2018.

  30. Fay MP, Feuer EJ. Confidence intervals for directly standardized rates: a method based on the gamma distribution. Stat Med. 1997;16(7):791–801.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Anderson R, Rosenberg H. Age standardization of death rates: implementation of the year 200 standard. Hyattsville: National Center for Health Statistics; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Ervik M, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, et al. Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide: IARC CancerBase No. 11.  Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2014. Available from: http://globocan.iarc.fr.

  33. Winkler V, Ott JJ, Holleczek B, Stegmaier C, Becher H. Cancer profile of migrants from the former Soviet Union in Germany: incidence and mortality. Cancer Causes Control. 2009;20(10):1873–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Spallek J, Arnold M, Hentschel S, Razum O. Cancer incidence rate ratios of Turkish immigrants in Hamburg, Germany: a registry based study. Cancer Epidemiol. 2009;33(6):413–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Spallek J, Arnold M, Razum O, Juel K, Rey G, Deboosere P, et al. Cancer mortality patterns among Turkish immigrants in four European countries and in Turkey. Eur J Epidemiol. 2012;27(12):915–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Kleiser C, Mensink GB, Neuhauser H, Schenk L, Kurth BM. Food intake of young people with a migration background living in Germany. Public Health Nutr. 2010;13(3):324–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Allemani C, Matsuda T, Di Carlo V, Harewood R, Matz M, Nikšić M, et al. Global surveillance of trends in cancer survival 2000–14 (CONCORD-3): analysis of individual records for 37 513 025 patients diagnosed with one of 18 cancers from 322 population-based registries in 71 countries. Lancet. 2018;391(10125):1023–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Bertram H, Hense H, Krieg V, Lehnert M, Mattauch V, Weihrauch B. Epidemiologische Krebsregistrierung in Nordrhein-Westfalen. Erfahrungen, Ergebnisse, Perspektiven Münster: Epidemiologisches Krebsregister NRW; 2006. Available from: http://www.krebsregister.nrw.de/fileadmin/user_upload/dokumente/veroeffentlichungen/15_abschlussbericht2006-krebsregister-muenster.pdf. Accessed 14 Jan 2019.

  39. Simbrich A, Wellmann I, Heidrich J, Heidinger O, Hense HW. Trends in advanced breast cancer incidence rates after implementation of a mammography screening program in a German population. Cancer Epidemiol. 2016;44:44–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Eisfeld A. Vom Stolperstein zur Brücke – Die Deutschen in Russland. In: Bergner C, Weber M, editors. Aussiedler- und Minderheitenpolitik in Deutschland Bilanz und Perspektiven. Oldenburg: Bundesinstitut für Kultur und Geschichte der Deutschen im östlichen Europa; 2009. p. 310.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss. Richtlinie über die Früherkennung von Krebserkrankungen; 2016. Available from: http://www.g-ba.de/downloads/62-492-1108/KFE-RL_2015-10-15_iK-2016-01-19.pdf. Accessed 12 Feb 2016.

  42. Reiss K, Schunck R, Razum O. Effect of length of stay on smoking among Turkish and eastern European immigrants in Germany--interpretation in the light of the smoking epidemic model and the acculturation theory. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015;12(12):15925–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the reviewers of this manuscript. Furthermore, we would like to thank Jamila Nabieva of the Heidelberg Institute of Global Health for her support with translations and Nikolai Loginow, deputy director of the German community in Tomsk, for the support of this study. The German Cancer Aid (Grant Number 111232) funded this study. Furthermore, we acknowledge financial support by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft within the funding programme Open Access Publishing, by the Baden-Württemberg Ministry of Science, Research and the Arts and by Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg.

Funding

The German Cancer Aid (Grant Number 111232) funded this study. Open access publishing was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft within the funding programme Open Access Publishing. The funding bodies were not involved in in the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Institute of Social Medicine and Epidemiology, Hochstraße 15, Brandenburg an der Havel, 14770, Germany

    Philipp Jaehn

  2. University Hospital Heidelberg, Institute of Global Health, Im Neuenheimer Feld 324, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany

    Simone Kaucher, Heiko Becher & Volker Winkler

  3. Tomsk Regional Oncological Hospital, Tomsk Regional Cancer Registry, Lenin str. 115, 634050, Tomsk, Russian Federation

    Lidia V. Pikalova & Sofia Mazeina

  4. Federal Cancer Registry of North Rhine-Westphalia, Gesundheitscampus 1, 44801, Bochum, Germany

    Hiltraud Kajüter

  5. Institute of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Building W34, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany

    Heiko Becher

  6. Department of Radiology, Radiotherapy and Oncology, Northern State Medical University, Trotsky av. 51, Arkhangelsk, Russia

    Mikhail Valkov

Authors
  1. Philipp Jaehn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Simone Kaucher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Lidia V. Pikalova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sofia Mazeina
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Hiltraud Kajüter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Heiko Becher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Mikhail Valkov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Volker Winkler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

PJ conceptualised the research question, analysed and interpreted the data and drafted the manuscript. SK and VW were involved in data interpretation and manuscript preparation. The AMIN study was designed by VW and HB and conducted by SK, HK, VW and HB. LVP and SM provided cancer registry data of Tomsk and HK provided cancer registry data of Münster. MV initiated the cooperation, coordinated partners in Germany and Russia and contributed to the conceptualisation of the study. All authors finalised and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Volker Winkler.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Individual consent for this study was waivered because exclusively routinely collected and pseudonymised data was used to conduct secondary data analyses. The project has been approved by the institutional review board of the Medical Faculty of Heidelberg University, Germany (ref. S-319/2013) and by the institutional review board of the Tomsk Regional Oncological Hospital, Russia (reg. no. 60/2019). We declare that research has been conducted in accordance with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Additional file

Additional file 1:

Sensitivity analysis of standardised incidence rate ratios of ethnic Germans living in Tomsk assuming three different scenarios of underlying population figures. (DOCX 31 kb)

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jaehn, P., Kaucher, S., Pikalova, L.V. et al. A cross-national perspective of migration and cancer: incidence of five major cancer types among resettlers from the former Soviet Union in Germany and ethnic Germans in Russia. BMC Cancer 19, 869 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-6058-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-6058-6

Keywords

BMC Cancer

ISSN: 1471-2407

Contact us