Skip to main content
Download PDF

Negative associations between folate and bacterial vaginosis in the NHANES 2001 to 2004

BMC Infectious Diseases volume 23, Article number: 483 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is one of the most common infections among women of reproductive age and accounts for 15–50% of infections globally. The role played by folate in the pathogenesis and progression of BV is poorly understood. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between serum folate, red blood cell (RBC) folate, and BV in American women.

Methods

1,954 participants from the 2001-2004 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) program were included in this study. Multiple logistic regression was used to analyze the association between serum folate, RBC folate, and BV, and covariates including race, age, education level, and body mass index were used to construct adjusted models. Stratified analysis was used to explore the stability of the above associations in different populations.

Results

In the present cross-sectional study, we found that serum folate and RBC folate were inversely associated with the risk of BV. In the fully adjusted model, the risk of BV was reduced by 35% (OR=0.65, 95% CI: 0.51~0.83, p=0.0007) in the highest serum folate group and 32% (OR=0.68, 95% CI: 0.53~0.87, p=0.0023) in the highest RBC folate group compared to the lowest group.

Conclusions

The results of this study indicated that serum folate and RBC folate were inversely associated with the risk of BV folate supplementation may play an important role in the prevention and management of BV.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is a syndrome caused by mixed infection of Gardnerella vaginalis and some anaerobic bacteria that causes an imbalance in the vaginal microbiome, resulting in increased vaginal discharge, fishy vaginal odour, itching, and burning of the vulva. Women with BV infection are at increased risk of certain sexually transmitted diseases (e.g., HIV, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Chlamydia trachomatis, and HSV-2), complications after gynaecological surgery, pregnancy complications, and recurrence of BV [1, 2]. BV also increases the risk of HIV transmission to their sexual partners [3].

Treatment is usually effective, but it is prone to recur after cessation of medications [4,5,6,7]. Prevalence rates of BV are varied considerable from the geographic regions of the world, within the same country, and even within the same population, ranging from 4 to 75%, depending on the population studied, with an intermediate level in the USA (29%) [8, 9].

Theoretically, susceptibility to BV may be increased by factors that compromise the immune system, including folate deficiency. An American study found that the folate antagonist methotrexate, used to treat autoimmune and chronic inflammatory diseases, inhibits thymidine synthesis and induces apoptosis of activated T lymphocytes [10]. Weinstein's studies have shown that low serum and red blood cell folate are associated with an increased risk of invasive cervical cancer, but no studies have demonstrated the effects of serum folate and RBC folate on BV [11]. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the association of serum folate and folate with the risk of BV and to further explore folic acid supplementation as an intervention strategy to reduce the risk of BV.

Materials and methods

Data sources

Source of our datas were selected from The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) with survey cycle from 2001-2002 and 2003-2004, a program of studies intended for assessing the health and nutritional status of noninstitutionalized U.S. citizens [12, 13]. Missing data on BV status, serum folate, and RBC folate (n = 18,628) were first excluded, and then other variables including age, race, education level, BMI, uric acid, serum vitamin B12, total cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, calcium, and physical activity (n = 579) were dislodged, 1,954 female participants fit the selection criteria were included in our analysis. A flowchart of the screening process is depicted in Fig. 1. Datas from this study are accessible through publicly available NHANES data files.

Fig. 1
figure 1

The flow chart of the study

Full size image

Determination of serum folate concentrations

The serum folate concentration was measured using the Bio-Rad Laboratories' Quantitative Phase II Folate Radioassay Kit. The method was to combine the serum sample with 125I-folate in a liquor consisting of dithiothreitol (DTT) and cyanide. The mixture was heated to collect to devitalize folate-binding protein from endogenesis. During heating, DTT stabilized reduced folate and its analogues. The mixture was cooled and bound to the affinity-purified porcine inherent factor with immobilization and folinic acid binding protein, and the pH of the reactants was adjusted until it reached 9.2. Then, the mixture was reacted at room temperature for one hour.

Endogenous folate and marked folate compete on a relative concentration basis for a limited binding site. After centrifugation and decantation, the reaction mixtures were analysed. Marked and unmarked folate bound to the immobilized protein was deposited as particles at the bottom of the test tube. Unbound folate in the supernatant was cast off, and the radioactivity from the granules was calculated. The criteria curve was drawn adopting a precalibrated folate/B12 standard in the human serum albumin base. Participants' serum folate concentrations were calculated from standard curves.

Determination of RBC folate concentrations

Procedure for the RBC folate that samples were first diluted 1:11 with 1 g/dL ascorbic acid in an aqueous solution. Then, an incubation period of 90 min followed before the assay or immediately frozen to hemolyze RBC for subsequent assay. By both methods, the endogenous folate conjugate hydrolyzed the conjugated pteryla polyglutamate before the assay. Samples and the protein diluent, human serum albumin, were diluted 1:2 to give matrices similar to the standard and serum samples.

Diagnosis of BV

BV measurement procedures can be found easily in NHANES documentation [14]. Self-collected vaginal swabs were received from participants aged 16–49 in the Mobile Examination Center. Subsequently, these swabs were applied to pH paper and attached to a glass slide, which was Gram-stained and evaluated by NHANES personnel at their central laboratory according to Nugent's criteria. The Nugent scoring system interprets Gram-stained vaginal smears according to the morphological type of bacteria, reflecting the overall characteristics of the vaginal flora [15]. The slides were scanned for 964 d under a microscope with a low magnification objective to locate clusters of epithelial cells. BV outcome was recognized as positive when the score was graded from 7 to 10, and a score of 0 to 6 was considered normal [15]. We omitted women without Nugent scoring system results.

Covariates

As the results may be influenced by multiple factors, we selected participants' age, education, race, BMI, serum vitamin B12 [16], uric acid [17], total cholesterol [18, 19], lipoprotein cholesterol, calcium [19], marital status [20, 21], and physical activity as potential covariates for this study. Classification of Mexican American, other Hispanic, non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black, and other races (including Multi-Racial) was used to describe the race. Education was categorized into lower than high school, high school graduate, or higher than high school. BMI was calculated based on height and weight. Marital status was rated as married, widowed, divorced, separated, never married, and living with a partner. Physical activity was classified by activity level as no activity, moderate activity, vigorous activity, and both. Specific information on serum vitamin B12, uric acid, total cholesterol, lipoprotein cholesterol, and calcium content was extracted from NHANES laboratory test data.

Statistical analysis

R Statistical Package (The R Foundation; http://www.r-project.org; version 3.6.3) and Empower Stats (www.empowerstats.net, X&Y solutions, Inc. Boston, Massachusetts) for our data analyses to perform data processing. When describing the research population, we represent continuous variables with the mean and standard deviation and classified variables with weighted percentages (%) in descriptive analysis. For statistical significance, the χ2 test and the Kruskal‒Wallis test were used separately for categorical variables and continuous variables. OR values reflect the correlation between clinical outcome and exposure [22]. To determine the relationship between serum folate and RBC folate and the incidence of BV, we conducted stratified analysis and multiple logistic regression analysis and fitted smooth curves. We calculated a 95% confidence interval. All statistical analyses in this study were statistically significant when p < 0.05.

Results

Baseline characteristics of the study participants

Two cycles of NHANES, 2001–2002 and 2003–2004, were utilized in this study. 21,161 potentially eligible participants were screened; of these, those who completed both the interview and the MEC exam were included in our study. Participants with missing data on BV (n = 18,493) and serum folate and RBC folate concentrations (n = 135) were excluded. After further excluding those with missing data on critical covariates, 1,954 participants were enrolled in our analysis. Figure 1 depicts the flowchart of the exclusion criteria. Based on BV, the descriptive characteristics of the participants are listed in Table 1. Compared to those who were negative for BV, participants with positive BV were more likely to be non-Hispanic black, never married, had lower BMI, had lower serum folate, RBC folate, HDL-cholesterol, calcium, higher uric acid, serum vitamin B12, received less than high school education, and took part in both moderate and vigorous physical activity. No statistically significant differences were detected in age or total cholesterol (p > 0.05).

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of participants (N = 1954)
Full size table

Association between serum folate and BV

Table 2 shows the association between the three groups of serum folate levels and BV. The crude model is an unadjusted model with no adjustments made for any variables. Adjusted model 1 was an incompletely adjusted model, adjusting mainly for demographic variables, including age, race, education level, and BMI. Adjusted model 2 was a fully adjusted model, with all included covariates adjusted. The group with the highest serum folate levels had the lowest risk of BV compared to the remaining two groups, with a 35% risk reduction in incidence compared to the low-level group, which was statistically significant (p = 0.0007). A negative association between serum folate levels and the incidence of BV was stable in all three models. Smoothing curves were used to visualise the association between serum folate levels and the incidence of BV, and Fig. 2 depicts the results.

Table 2 Association between serum folate and BV
Full size table
Fig. 2
figure 2

Correlation between serum folate and BV

Full size image

Association between RBC folate and BV

Table 3 shows the association between the three groups of RBC folate levels and BV, adjusting the model to be consistent with Table 2. The group with the highest RBC folate levels had the lowest risk of BV compared to the remaining two groups, with a 32% risk reduction in incidence compared to the low-level group, which was statistically significant (p = 0.0023) and consistent with the above results. A negative association between RBC folate levels and the incidence of BV was found to be stable in all three models. Smoothing curves were used to visualize the association between RBC folate levels and the incidence of BV, and the results are shown in Fig. 3.

Table 3 Association between RBC folate and BV
Full size table
Fig. 3
figure 3

Correlation between RBC folate and BV

Full size image

Stratification analysis between serum folate and BV

As shown in Fig. 4, stratified analyses were conducted for age, race, education level, BMI, marital status, physical activity, and relevant biochemical indicators such as uric acid, vitamin B12, HDL-cholesterol, and total cholesterol. The results of the stratified analysis showed that although the OR values fluctuated across the subgroups, the direction of the results was mostly consistent (OR < 1), indicating that the results of this study were stable and sensitive. Additionally, high heterogeneity was observed in terms of race, BMI, education, and marital status. However, it was relatively stable in the age stratification.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Stratification analysis between serum folate and BV

Full size image

Stratification analysis between RBC folate and BV

As shown in Fig. 5, the stratified analysis revealed greater fluctuations in OR values across subgroups compared to Fig. 4. However, the directions of the results were all equally consistent (OR < 1), indicating that the results of this study remained stable and sensitive. Nevertheless, a high degree of heterogeneity was also found between the different strata of factors, and results were mostly significant.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Stratification analysis between RBC folate and BV

Full size image

Discussion

The cross-sectional analysis was carried out using two consolidated datasets of NHANES surveys from 2001 to 2004. Based on the outcomes of different models, a significant negative correlation was found between RBC folate concentrations and BV, as well as between serum folate concentrations and BV.

According past researches, this is the first study is to assess the relationship between folate and BV. Only Anne L. Dunlop et al. [23] supposed that folic acid deficiency is closely related to BV during pregnancy. The results showed that with the increase in RBC folate, the incidence of BV decreased significantly. This is consistent with the research results of Neggers YH et al. [19] and Dunlop AL et al. [23], which confirmed that folate was negatively correlated with BV. The risk of BV decreased with the increase in serum folate and RBC folate, indicating that serum folate and RBC folate may affect the occurrence of BV. However, it remains unclear whether the exact mechanism of BV is affected by folic acid.

Common general understanding that supposed immune factors may play a vital role in the pathogenesis of BV [19, 24, 25]. Studies have revealed that folic acid intake might improve immune function [26], thereby reducing the risk of severe BV [19]. Meanwhile, the capacity of folic acid is to improve indirectly mucosal immune of the female subgenital through intestinal immune regulation [27].

Mucosal immunity of the female subgenital system plays an innate immune role through neutrophils, dendritic cells, natural killer cells, and other common innate immune cells [28]. The capacity of folic acid is to maintain or enhance the cellular activity of NK cells [29]. In contrast, the role of NK cells is to enhance innate non-specific immune function, thereby improving human immune function and reducing the incidence of BV.

In addition to playing a barrier role in the innate immune response, vaginal mucosa also mediates the adaptive immune response of vaginal mucosa through IgG and secretory IgA (sIgA) [28, 30]. The ability of sIgA is to enhance the activity of neutrophils that secrete chemokines that attract macrophages, T cells, and DCs and inhibit proteolysis [31, 32]. Part of the IgG that plays an immune role is locally secreted by the vaginal mucosa, and part of it is transferred to the genital tract mucosa through the circulatory system to play a role. The role of CD8+ T cells is to promote the Th1-cell-mediated immune response to intracellular pathogens [28]. The specific immune function of folic acid is to support and promote the Th1-mediated immune response and to play a significant role in antibody production and metabolism. Its advantage is facilitating the adaptive immune response of the body and reducing the incidence of BV [29].

For the assessment of folate levels, the National Pathology Alliance benchmarking review in the UK [33] and Christopher-John L, Farrell et al. [34] recommend measurement of serum folate, whereas traditionally, studies of folate status have used serum/plasma or RBC folate, both of which are widely available in the laboratory. Among them, RBC folate is favored by many clinicians and is a more labor-intensive test [35]. Therefore, serum folate and RBC folate concentrations were used as research indicators. The results showed that serum folate and RBC folate concentrations were negatively correlated with the risk of BV, because high serum folate and RBC folate concentrations indicated high folate levels in the body, as high folate levels help to enhance the body's immune response, thereby reducing the risk of BV.

In vitro experiments in quantity and epidemiological investigations have shown that the causes of BV are very complex. No research has revealed the connection between serum or RBC folic acid and the risk of BV. Therefore, further research on the association between serum folate and RBC folate and the risk of BV will play a positive role in the treatment, prevention, and reduction of the recurrence of BV. The aim of this study was to further research the relationship between serum or RBC folic acid, and BV risk and to display the study results more comprehensively and intuitively by adjusting the methods of confounding, hierarchical analysis, multiple regression analysis, curve fitting, etc. The findings that serum or RBC folate concentrations are negatively correlated with BV provided biological rationality for the relationship between people's nutritional status and BV and could be used to guide clinical prevention, treatment, and prognosis.

However, there are limitations to the current study. First, as a cross-sectional observational study, it is difficult to determine the temporal relationship of antecedents and consequences. The results may be influenced by other unmeasured variable quantities even after multiple adjustments. Second, although many samples were used, datas were collected from 2001 to 2004. Therefore, when extrapolating to today's environment, there may be some bias It is necessary to consider biases caused by the passage of time.

Conclusions

In conclusion, our study show that both serum folate and RBC folate are negatively associated with BV. Increasing the amount of serum folate and RBC folate in the body may boost our immune function and thereby reduce the risk of BV.

Availability of data and materials

Original data generated and analyzed during this study are included in this published article or in the data repositories listed in References. The dataset supporting the conclusions of this article is available in the NHANES repository, https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/index.htm.

References

  1. Nelson DB, Hanlon A, Hassan S, Britto J, Geifman-Holtzman O, Haggerty C, Fredricks DN. Preterm labor and bacterial vaginosis-associated bacteria among urban women. J Perinat Med. 2009;37(2):130–4.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Laxmi U, Agrawal S, Raghunandan C, Randhawa VS, Saili A. Association of bacterial vaginosis with adverse fetomaternal outcome in women with spontaneous preterm labor: a prospective cohort study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012;25(1):64–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cherpes TL, Wiesenfeld HC, Melan MA, Kant JA, Cosentino LA, Meyn LA, Hillier SL. The associations between pelvic inflammatory disease, Trichomonas vaginalis infection, and positive herpes simplex virus type 2 serology. Sex Transm Dis. 2006;33(12):747–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Workowski KA, Bolan GA. Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, 2015. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2015;64(Rr-03):1–137.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. AbouChacra L, Fenollar F, Diop K. Bacterial Vaginosis: What Do We Currently Know? Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021;11:672429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bautista CT, Wurapa E, Sateren WB, Morris S, Hollingsworth B, Sanchez JL. Bacterial vaginosis: a synthesis of the literature on etiology, prevalence, risk factors, and relationship with chlamydia and gonorrhea infections. Mil Med Res. 2016;3:4.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cohen CR, Lingappa JR, Baeten JM, Ngayo MO, Spiegel CA, Hong T, Donnell D, Celum C, Kapiga S, Delany S, et al. Bacterial vaginosis associated with increased risk of female-to-male HIV-1 transmission: a prospective cohort analysis among African couples. PLoS Med. 2012;9(6):e1001251.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bitew A, Abebaw Y, Bekele D, Mihret A. Prevalence of Bacterial Vaginosis and Associated Risk Factors among Women Complaining of Genital Tract Infection. Int J Microbiol. 2017;2017:4919404.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kenyon C, Colebunders R, Crucitti T. The global epidemiology of bacterial vaginosis: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;209(6):505–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Courtemanche C, Elson-Schwab I, Mashiyama ST, Kerry N, Ames BN. Folate deficiency inhibits the proliferation of primary human CD8+ T lymphocytes in vitro. J Immunol (Baltimore, Md : 1950). 2004;173(5):3186–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Weinstein SJ, Ziegler RG, Frongillo EA Jr, Colman N, Sauberlich HE, Brinton LA, Hamman RF, Levine RS, Mallin K, Stolley PD, et al. Low serum and red blood cell folate are moderately, but nonsignificantly associated with increased risk of invasive cervical cancer in U.S. women. J Nutr. 2001;131(7):2040–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Woteki CE, Briefel RR, Kuczmarski R. Federal monitoring of the nation’s nutritional status. Contributions of the National Center for Health Statistics. Ame J Clin Nutr. 1988;47(2):320–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ahluwalia N, Dwyer J, Terry A, Moshfegh A, Johnson C. Update on NHANES Dietary Data: Focus on Collection, Release, Analytical Considerations, and Uses to Inform Public Policy. Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md). 2016;7(1):121–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Geller RJ, Brotman RM, O’Brien KM, Fine DM, Zota AR. Phthalate exposure and odds of bacterial vaginosis among U.S. reproductive-aged women, NHANES 2001–2004. Reprod Toxicol. 2018;82:1–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Nugent RP, Krohn MA, Hillier SL. Reliability of diagnosing bacterial vaginosis is improved by a standardized method of gram stain interpretation. J Clin Microbiol. 1991;29(2):297–301.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Yüksel H, Odabasi AR, Cetin G, Eben M, Nergiz S, Onur E. Folate and vitamin B12 levels in abnormal pap smears: a case control study. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2007;28(6):526–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Jakovljević A, Bogavac M, Nikolić A, Tošić MM, Novaković Z, Stajić Z. The influence of bacterial vaginosis on gestational week of the completion of delivery and biochemical markers of inflammation in the serum. Vojnosanit Pregl. 2014;71(10):931–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Pleckaityte M. Cholesterol-Dependent Cytolysins Produced by Vaginal Bacteria: Certainties and Controversies. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2019;9:452.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Neggers YH, Nansel TR, Andrews WW, Schwebke JR, Yu KF, Goldenberg RL, Klebanoff MA. Dietary intake of selected nutrients affects bacterial vaginosis in women. J Nutr. 2007;137(9):2128–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Marconi C, Duarte MT, Silva DC, Silva MG. Prevalence of and risk factors for bacterial vaginosis among women of reproductive age attending cervical screening in southeastern Brazil. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015;131(2):137–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kalinka J, Hanke W, Wasiela M, Laudański T. Socioeconomic and environmental risk factors of bacterial vaginosis in early pregnancy. J Perinat Med. 2002;30(6):467–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Andrade C. Understanding relative risk, odds ratio, and related terms: as simple as it can get. J Clin Psychiatry. 2015;76(7):e857-861.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Dunlop AL, Taylor RN, Tangpricha V, Fortunato S, Menon R. Maternal vitamin D, folate, and polyunsaturated fatty acid status and bacterial vaginosis during pregnancy. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 2011;2011:216217.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. St John E, Mares D, Spear GT. Bacterial vaginosis and host immunity. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2007;4(1):22–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Murphy K, Mitchell CM. The Interplay of Host Immunity, Environment and the Risk of Bacterial Vaginosis and Associated Reproductive Health Outcomes. J Infect Dis. 2016;214 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S29-35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Dhur A, Galan P, Hercberg S. Folate status and the immune system. Prog Food Nutr Sci. 1991;15(1–2):43–60.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ponziani FR, Cazzato IA, Danese S, Fagiuoli S, Gionchetti P, Annicchiarico BE, D’Aversa F, Gasbarrini A. Folate in gastrointestinal health and disease. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2012;16(3):376–85.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Reis Machado J, da Silva MV, Cavellani CL, dos Reis MA, Monteiro ML, Teixeira Vde P, Miranda Corrêa RR. Mucosal immunity in the female genital tract HIV/AIDS. BioMed Res Int. 2014;2014:350195.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Maggini S, Pierre A, Calder PC. Immune Function and Micronutrient Requirements Change over the Life Course. Nutrients. 2018;10(10):1531.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Villa P, Cipolla C, D’Ippolito S, Amar ID, Shachor M, Ingravalle F, Scaldaferri F, Puca P, Di Simone N, Scambia G. The interplay between immune system and microbiota in gynecological diseases: a narrative review. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2020;24(10):5676–90.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Li Y, Jin L, Chen T. The Effects of Secretory IgA in the Mucosal Immune System. Biomed Res Int. 2020;2020:2032057.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Wira CR, Fahey JV, Sentman CL, Pioli PA, Shen L. Innate and adaptive immunity in female genital tract: cellular responses and interactions. Immunol Rev. 2005;206:306–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Galloway M, Rushworth L. Red cell or serum folate? Results from the National Pathology Alliance benchmarking review. J Clin Pathol. 2003;56(12):924–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Farrell CJ, Kirsch SH, Herrmann M. Red cell or serum folate: what to do in clinical practice? Clin Chem Lab Med. 2013;51(3):555–69.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Pillay TS, Oosthuizen NM. Why are we still measuring red cell folate instead of just serum folate? J Clin Pathol. 2014;67(4):289.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We express our sincere gratitude to all the patients and clinical researchers who were involved in the included studies for their wonderful work and valuable participation.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Ting-Ting Cui and Jing Luo contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510150, China

    Ting-Ting Cui, Jing Luo & Xu-Guang Guo

  2. Department of Pediatrics, The Pediatrics School of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 511436, China

    Ting-Ting Cui, Yun-Ting Yang, Ya-Wen Yin & Xing-Fei Chen

  3. Department of Clinical Medicine, The Third Clinical School of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 511436, China

    Jing Luo, Hao-Kai Chen, Ze-Min Huang & Xu-Guang Guo

  4. KingMed School of Laboratory Medicine, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 511436, China

    Rui-Lan Deng, Xiao-Yan Deng & Xu-Guang Guo

  5. Department of Clinical Medicine, The Nanshan College of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 511436, China

    Wan-Zhe Liao

  6. Guangzhou Key Laboratory for Clinical Rapid Diagnosis and Early Warning of Infectious Diseases, KingMed School of Laboratory Medicine, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 511436, China

    Xiao-Yan Deng & Xu-Guang Guo

  7. Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Major Obstetric Diseases, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510150, China

    Xu-Guang Guo

  8. Key Laboratory of Reproduction and Genetics of Guangdong Higher Education Institutes, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510150, China

    Xu-Guang Guo

Authors
  1. Ting-Ting Cui
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jing Luo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rui-Lan Deng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yun-Ting Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ya-Wen Yin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Xing-Fei Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Hao-Kai Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Wan-Zhe Liao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Ze-Min Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Xiao-Yan Deng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Xu-Guang Guo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization, XG, XY, TT and JL; Data curation, TT, JL, HK and WZ; Writing review and editing, TT, JL, RL, YT, YW, XF, and ZM; Supervision, XG and XY. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Xiao-Yan Deng or Xu-Guang Guo.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The authors are liable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the study are appropriately investigated and resolved. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (as revised in 2013). All protocols for the NHANES were approved by the CDC’s National Center for Health Statistics Institutional Research Ethics Review Board. All participants provided written informed consent. All additional materials are available at https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/about_nhanes.htm. All information from the NHANES program is available and free for the public, so the agreement of the medical ethics committee board was not necessary.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cui, TT., Luo, J., Deng, RL. et al. Negative associations between folate and bacterial vaginosis in the NHANES 2001 to 2004. BMC Infect Dis 23, 483 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-023-08318-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-023-08318-5

Keywords

BMC Infectious Diseases

ISSN: 1471-2334

Contact us