Skip to main content
Download PDF

Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) as a potential predictor and intervention target for perioperative ischemic stroke: a retrospective cohort study

BMC Anesthesiology volume 23, Article number: 268 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The prognostic nutritional index (PNI) is a nutritional indicator and predictor of various diseases. However it is unclear whether PNI can be a predictor of perioperative ischemic stroke. This study aims to evaluate the association of the preoperative PNI and ischemic stroke in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery.

Methods

The retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent noncardiac surgery between January 2008 and August 2019. The patients were divided into PNI ≥ 38.8 and PNI < 38.8 groups according to the cut-off value of PNI. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to explore the association between PNI and perioperative ischemic stroke. Subsequently, propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed to eliminate the confounding factors of covariates and further validate the results. Subgroup analyses were completed to assess the predictive utility of PNI for perioperative ischemic stroke in different groups.

Results

Amongst 221,542 hospitalized patients enrolled, 485 (0.22%) experienced an ischemic stroke within 30 days of the surgery, 22.1% of patients were malnourished according to PNI < 38.8, and the occurrence of perioperative ischemic stroke was 0.34% (169/49055) in the PNI < 38.8 group. PNI < 38.8 was significantly associated with an increased incidence of perioperative ischemic stroke whether in univariate logistic regression analysis (OR = 1.884, 95% CI: 1.559—2.267, P < 0.001) or multivariate logistic regression analysis (OR = 1.306, 95% CI: 1.061—1.602, P = 0.011). After PSM analysis, the ORs of PNI < 38.8 group were 1.250 (95% CI: 1.000–1.556, P = 0.050) and 1.357 (95% CI: 1.077–1.704, P = 0.009) in univariate logistic regression analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis respectively. The subgroup analysis indicated that reduced PNI was significantly associated to an increased risk of perioperative ischemic stroke in patients over 65 years old, ASA II, not taking aspirin before surgery, without a history of stroke, who had neurosurgery, non-emergency surgery, and were admitted to ICU after surgery.

Conclusions

Our study indicates that low preoperative PNI is significantly associated with a higher incidence of ischemic stroke in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery. Preoperative PNI, as a preoperative nutritional status evaluation index, is an independent risk factor useful to predict perioperative ischemic stroke risk, which could be used as an intervenable preoperative clinical biochemical index to reduce the incidence of perioperative ischemic stroke.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Perioperative ischemic stroke is an under-recognized but life-threatening complication of surgery resulting in high rates of disability and mortality [1]. Epidemiologic data suggests that postoperative stroke occurs approximately between 0.1% and 9.7% of patients undergoing surgery [2]. The risk of death is 26% for patients after general surgery, which could increase to up to 60% in those who previously had a stroke, and perioperative ischemic stroke is associated with a high mortality rate of patients [3, 4]. Due to delays in obtaining diagnostic imaging, narrow thrombolysis time window, and the reduced use of thrombolysis given the risk of recent surgery, perioperative ischemic stroke is often associated with poor outcomes. Therefore, it is crucial to identify the optimal risk factors to predict perioperative ischemic stroke risk, so as to intervene in time and actively provide treatment to reduce the incidence of perioperative ischemic stroke in clinical practice.

Emerging evidence shows that inflammation is key in the pathophysiology of the development, acute damage cascades, and chronic course after ischemic stroke in clinical and animal studies [5]. The chronic inflammatory process, caused by the persistence of factors that contribute to the inflammatory process, is a long-term physiological response to elements such as malnutrition, stress, viral infections, and environmental toxins [5]. Nutrition may play a central role in the regulation of chronic inflammation in perioperative ischemic stroke. Thus researching appropriate nutritional parameters is critical for evaluating the inflammatory process effectively in patients diagnosed with perioperative ischemic stroke.

The prognostic nutritional index (PNI), which is an index calculated by serum albumin concentration and lymphocyte value of peripheral blood, reflects both nutritional and inflammatory status, and prognosis in patients [6]. Unlike other screening tools, PNI can be easily evaluated in laboratory tests during preoperative diagnosis. To date PNI is generally used to evaluate the various cancers [7,8,9] and carprognosis of diovascular diseases [10,11,12]. High preoperative PNI might be a predictor of postoperative AKI and surgical prognosis in patients who underwent open hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma [13]. In addition, PNI has been reported as a predictor of long-term mortality in older adults who had an ischemic stroke [14]. It’s worth noting that a large number of studies evaluating PNI have focused on disease outcomes such as survival and mortality, rather than predictors of disease occurrence. Besides, leucocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (LLR) is an inflammatory factor which is closely associated with postoperative outcomes in patients with various clinical conditions [15]. However so far PNI has not been used to predict the risk of ischemic stroke in patients after surgery.

In this study, we hypothesized that the primary outcome is decreased preoperative PNI could be associated with the increase of perioperative ischemic stroke after non-cardiac surgery, and the secondary outcome is that lower preoperative PNI was significantly associated with a higher incidence of perioperative ischemic stroke in certain subgroups such as patients over 65 years old, neurosurgery, and postoperative ICU admission. This study aims to test the hypothesis and determine the threshold value of preoperative PNI for predicting the occurrence of perioperative ischemic stroke.

Materials and methods

Study design and patients

We retrospectively reviewed perioperative data for 221,542 hospitalized patients from the First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital from January 2008 to August 2019. The study included patients who underwent non-cardiac surgery with anesthesia. The exclusion criteria were the followings: (1) age < 18 years old, (2) duration of surgery ≤ 60 min, (3) regional anesthesia, (4) American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification ≥ IV, and (5) missing data for any confounders.

Ethical approval

The study was following the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by Ethics Committee of Chinese PLA General Hospital (No. S2021-496–01), and the date of the research proposal was 1 March 2022. The requirement of written informed consent for patients was waived by Ethics Committee of Chinese PLA General Hospital, because the study was retrospective and all data were anonymous.

Definitions of outcomes

The primary outcome was defined as a diagnosis, in the 30 days following the surgery, of perioperative ischemic stroke, an episode of neurological dysfunction caused by focal cerebral, spinal, or retinal infarction, with imaging or other objective evidence of ischemia in a vascular distribution ultimately manifesting as motor, sensory, or cognitive impairment [16, 17]. We identified hospitalized patients who were billed for any ICD-9-CM/ICD-10-CM diagnosis of ischemic stroke within 30 postoperative days.

Data collection

We used clinical data on perioperative variables from the electronic medical record system. Patient demographic data includes age, sex, body mass index (BMI), American Society of Anesthesiologists physical score (ASA), the presence of comorbid diseases —such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, coronary heart disease, arterial fibrillation, arrhythmology, previous ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), peripheral vascular disease, and renal dysfunction—, and preoperative mean arterial pressure (MAP). Preoperative medication use includes β-blockers, ACEI, ARB, aspirin, and glucocorticoid. Laboratory tests (in the 3 days prior to surgery) include hemoglobin, albumin, total bilirubin, and prothrombin time, as well as leucocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (LLR) = total leucocyte count / total lymphocyte count, PNI = 10 × serum albumin (g/dL) + 0.005 × total lymphocyte count (per mm3) [18].

The intraoperative data are emergency status, type of surgery, malignant tumor surgery, duration of procedures, estimated blood loss, bleeding volume, crystalloid or colloid infusion, non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) use, and use of glucocorticoid medication. In addition, data on ICU admission after surgery was also collected.

Association between PNI and perioperative ischemic stroke

We used the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve to calculate the optimal cut-off value of PNI and LLR. The ROC analysis showed the optimal cut-off value of PNI should be set at 38.8 for predicting risk of perioperative ischemic stroke. Subsequently, we performed univariable and multivariable logistic analyses to evaluate the association between perioperative ischemic stroke and PNI as categorical variables. We adjusted multivariable logistic models for age, sex, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, prior ischemic stroke, β-blockers medication, aspirin medication, preoperative glucocorticoid, preoperative MAP, preoperative LLR, facility, surgical types, bleeding volume, and ICU admission after surgery.

Propensity score‑matching analysis and adjustment

To address potential residual confounding, we performed propensity score-matching (PSM) to further assess the prognostic value of the PNI [19]. Propensity scores were calculated via a multivariate logistic regression analysis for baseline differences. Patients with PNI ≥ 38.8 and PNI < 38.8 were matched at a 2:1 ratio based on their propensity scores using nearest-neighbor matching, with a matching tolerance of 0.01%. We then used Kernel density plots of propensity scores to examine equivalence between matched patients. The baseline differences in clinical covariates between the PNI ≥ 38.8 and PNI < 38.8 groups were balanced using a PSM analysis. We calculated the standardized mean differences (SMD) to compare baseline differences before and after PSM, with minor differences being defined as an absolute value lower than 0.10 (small effect size).

Subgroup analyses

We conducted subgroup analyses to explore the association between PNI and perioperative ischemic stroke in different subgroups organized by age, sex, ASA, aspirin, neurosurgery department, emergency status, ICU admission after surgery, and previous ischemic stroke. We generated a forest plot to summarize PNI predictions for perioperative ischemic stroke in subgroups.

Statistical analysis

Continuous variables presented as mean (SD) or median (interquartile range, IQR) were compared using Student t test or Manne-Whitney U test as appropriate. Categorical variables presented as n (%) were compared using χ2 test or Fisher exact test.

To examine the association between preoperative PNI and perioperative ischemic stroke, we treated PNI as a categorical variable and conducted univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis. The variables in the multivariable logistic regression analysis were those with statistically significant differences between groups in the univariate logistic regression analysis and in clinical practice. Results are presented as the odds ratio (OR) with the 95% confidence interval (CI). The optimal cut-off value of PNI was calculated according to the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. To further reduce or eliminate the bias between the two groups (PNI ≥ 38.8 and PNI < 38.8), we performed a PSM analysis to further assess the prognostic value of the PNI using cut-offs in perioperative ischemic stroke. In PSM analysis, patients in the two groups were matched by propensity score (PS) at a 2:1 ratio. To further explore the association between PNI and perioperative ischemic stroke in different subgroups, we conducted subgroup analyses with multivariable logistic regression stratified by several key variables (age, sex, ASA, preoperative aspirin, neurosurgery department, emergency treatment, postoperative ICU, previous ischemic stroke).

The logistic regression model was performed using R version 4.0.1 (R Foundation, Vienna, Austria). Statistical significance was set at a two-tailed P-value < 0.05. Odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were displayed for all models.

Results

Clinical characteristics of the study cohort

A total of 376,933 hospitalized patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery from January 2008 to August 2019 were enrolled in the study. After excluding 155,391 patients based on the described exclusion criteria, 221,542 eligible patients were enrolled in the analyses (Fig. 1). The median age of the enrolled patients was 52 years old (IQR: 41, 62), and 50.7% of the enrolled patients (112,315/221,542) were male. The incidence of perioperative ischemic stroke was 0.21% (485/221,542) in the overall cohort study.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Study flow diagram. ASA, American Society of Anesthesiologists; PNI, prognostic nutritional index; PSM, propensity score matching

Full size image

Baseline characteristics of patients

In order to accurately predict perioperative ischemic stroke risk, we completed the ROC curve, which showed the optimal cut-off value of PNI to be 38.8, with an area under the ROC curve of 0.589 (Supplementary Fig. 1), and the optimal cut-off value of LLR as 3.3, with an area under the ROC curve of 0.644 (Supplementary Fig. 2). The baseline characteristics of the patients are presented according to PNI ≥ 38.8 and PNI < 38.8 groups in Table 1. All baseline characteristics differed between PNI ≥ 38.8 and PNI < 38.8 groups except for preoperative ARB. Compared to patients in the PNI ≥ 38.8 group, patients in PNI < 38.8 group were more likely to be older, male, have a lower BMI, and showed more comorbidities (hypertension, diabetes mellitus, coronary heart disease, arterial fibrillation, arrhythmology, previous ischemic stroke, TIA, COPD, peripheral vascular disease, renal dysfunction) and longer ICU admissions after surgery. We also observed a trend of patients in PNI < 38.8 group having higher levels of preoperative LLR, surgery duration, blood loss, crystalloids and colloids infusion than patients in PNI ≥ 38.8 group.

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of unadjusted sample and propensity score-matched sample
Full size table

Association between PNI and perioperative ischemic stroke

We initially explored the association between PNI as categorical variable and perioperative ischemic stroke using univariate and multivariate logistic analyses. The univariate analysis showed that age, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, prior ischemic stroke, β-blockers medication, aspirin medication, preoperative glucocorticoid, preoperative MAP, preoperative LLR, facility, surgical procedures, bleeding volume, and ICU admission after surgery were associated with a greater risk of perioperative ischemic stroke (Supplementary Table 1). The odds ratio (OR) of the PNI < 38.8 group was 1.884 (95% CI: 1.559—2.267, P < 0.001) in the univariate analysis, that is, the decreased PNI (PNI < 38.8) was significantly associated with an increased incidence of perioperative ischemic stroke (Table 2).

Table 2 Association between PNI with Perioperative Ischemic Stroke after non-cardiac surgery
Full size table

Statistically significant factors in univariate analysis were then included in the multivariate regression analysis to investigate the significant predictors of perioperative ischemic stroke. Patients in PNI < 38.8 group showed a higher OR of perioperative ischemic stroke (OR = 1.306, 95% CI: 1.061—1.602, P = 0.011). In addition, the variables that acted as independent risk factors for predicting perioperative ischemic stroke in the multivariate logistic regression analysis are shown in the Supplementary Table 1.

Propensity score-matching analysis and adjustment

We performed further PSM analysis to omit unmatched variables. In the PSM cohort study, we matched 15 variables between PNI ≥ 38.8 and PNI < 38.8 groups which are shown in Supplementary Table 2. A total of 80,106 patients in the PNI ≥ 38.8 group were matched at a ratio of 2:1 with 40,052 patients in the PNI < 38.8 group. The distribution of propensity scores of patients before and after PSM is shown in Fig. 2. After matching, the baseline characteristics of the two groups were generally well balanced, with SMDs less than 0.10 for most of the covariates. In the univariate logistic regression analysis after PSM, the OR of the PNI < 38.8 group was 1.250 (95% CI: 1.000–1.556, P = 0.050). Following multivariate logistic regression adjustment after PSM, the OR significantly increased to 1.357 (95% CI: 1.077–1.704, P = 0.009), while the association between PNI and perioperative ischemic stroke remained robust (Supplementary Table 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Distribution of propensity scores before and after matching

Full size image

Subgroup analyses

In our subgroup analyses, the reduced PNI was significant associated to an increased risk of perioperative ischemic stroke in patients for age ≥ 65 years old (OR = 1.41, 95% CI: 1.04–1.90, P = 0.03), female (OR = 1.35, 95% CI: 0.10–1.82, P = 0.05), and ASA II (OR = 1.39, 95% CI: 1.07–1.78, P = 0.01). In addition, the reduced PNI was significantly associated with perioperative ischemic stroke in patients who were not taking aspirin before surgery (OR = 1.41, 95% CI: 1.12–1.77, P = 0.00), didn’t have a history of stroke (OR = 1.24, 95% CI: 0.86–1.79, P = 0.01), and had neurosurgery (OR = 1.98, 95% CI: 1.39–2.78, P = 0.00) and non-emergency surgery (OR = 1.24, 95% CI: 0.994–1.541, P = 0.05). This increased risk was also significant in patients admitted to the ICU after surgery (OR = 1.46, 95% CI: 1.08–1.96, P = 0.01) (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Subgroup analyses of the association between PNI and perioperative ischemic stroke. PNI, prognostic nutritional index; OR, odds ratio; CI, Confidence interval; ASA, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification

Full size image

Discussion

In this study the PNI cut-off value is determined to be 38.8 for predicting perioperative ischemic stroke risk in patients after non-cardiac surgery. The cut-off value for LLR, which had a different significance level between the PNI ≥ 38.8 group and the PNI < 38.8 group, was found to be 3.28. Our analysis suggests that reduced preoperative PNI is an important nutritional risk factor for perioperative ischemic stroke.

We first used univariate logistic analysis to investigate the association between perioperative ischemic stroke and PNI as categorical variable with a cut-off value of 38.8, and PNI < 38.8 was a significant predictor for perioperative ischemic stroke (OR = 1.884, 95% CI: 1.559—2.267, P < 0.001). We then performed a multivariate logistic regression analysis with a model including preoperative, intraoperative, and other variables, to further explore the association between perioperative ischemic stroke and PNI. In a similar way, the results revealed PNI < 38.8 to be an independent nutritional risk factor for ischemic stroke in patients after surgery (OR = 1.306, 95% CI: 1.061—1.602, P = 0.011). Though the studies reported that the risk for perioperative stroke depends on type of surgery and previous medical history [17, 20], we did not exclude patients with previous/recent cerebrovascular events and select type of surgery, the reason is that we want to prove that preoperative PNI is an independent risk factor useful to predict perioperative ischemic stroke risk in the whole population. To eliminate the potential residual confounding variables, we subsequently performed PSM analysis to further identify the relationship between perioperative ischemic stroke and PNI using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. After matching, the results revealed that reduced PNI was significantly associated with an increased risk of perioperative ischemic stroke. In our subgroup analysis we found that PNI < 38.8 is a powerful nutritional predictor of perioperative ischemic stroke in patients of age ≥ 65 years old, ASA II, not taking aspirin before surgery, without a history of stroke, who had neurosurgery, non-emergency surgery, and were admitted to ICU after surgery.

Chronic inflammation plays a vital role in the pathology and development of ischemic stroke. PNI, an index calculated using the serum albumin and lymphocyte count, is a biological marker that indicates a patient’s chronic inflammatory and nutritional status [6]. Serum albumin, a unique multifunctional protein, is reported to exert significantly neuroprotective effects against ischemic stroke via reducing the hematocrit level and inhibiting oxidizing agents [21, 22]. An important clinical trial published in Stroke found that relatively low serum albumin level is associated with poor outcome in patients with ischemic stroke [23]. Lymphocytes are also known to play a pivotal role in ischemic stroke [24], and one study showed that lower lymphocyte counts correlate with poor functional outcomes after acute ischemic stroke [25]. LLR is associated with inflammatory processes and believed to be involved in the pathogenesis of ischemic stroke [15, 26]. Taking into account that LLR ≥ 3.28 is significantly associated with the increase of perioperative ischemic stroke in univariate analysis and LLR is considered to be involved in the development of ischemic stroke, we included LLR in multivariate analysis in the study, and further identified that the decreased PNI is an independent risk factor to predict perioperative ischemic stroke. Therefore, a decreased PNI value indicates that patients are in a malnourished and inflammatory status, which has the potential to become a risk predictor for perioperative ischemic stroke.

To our knowledge this is the first study to evaluate the association between the preoperative PNI and ischemic stroke in patients with non-cardiac surgery. Screening the nutritional status plays a vital role in patients with perioperative ischemic stroke after non-cardiac surgery. However common malnutrition screening tools, such as the malnutrition universal screening tool for malnutrition, may be unsuitable for use in clinical practice due to complex measurement procedures and the need for professional assistance [27]. PNI could be used as a screening tool for nutritional status in clinical settings, as it can be easily calculated from parameters that are routinely measured in the case record: serum albumin concentration and lymphocytes count. We believe, given our incorporation in the study of data from a large-scale database, that the experimental results are relatively accurate. In our study we observed that decreased PNI was an independent predictor of perioperative stroke. These results suggest that preoperative PNI may be a biological marker to predict perioperative ischemic stroke risk.

Previous studies have reported that poor nutrition increases the risk of ischemic stroke [28,29,30], and a recent randomized clinical trial of medically hospitalized patients at nutritional risk found that the use of individualized nutritional support during hospitalization improved important clinical outcomes, including survival, compared to standard hospital food [31]. Since preoperative PNI is a biological marker that reflects a patient’s nutritional status, we could intervene and provide treatments —treating the preoperative underlying diseases (hypertension, diabetes, atrial tremor, etc.), enhancing care, individualizing nutritional support for patients before surgery to prevent perioperative ischemic stroke— to improve the preoperative PNI. Preoperative PNI could be used as an intervenable preoperative clinical biochemical index to reduce the incidence of perioperative ischemic stroke. That is, PNI < 38.8 was significantly associated with an increased incidence of perioperative ischemic stroke in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery. Monitoring the PNI indicators is helpful to predict the occurrence of malnutrition before operation, so as to provide guidance for the prevention of malnutrition and reduce the incidence of perioperative ischemic stroke in patients. Addressing poor nutrition requires collaborative efforts across various sectors, including healthcare providers, nursing, and availability of nutritious food. However further studies including prospective studies are required to help verify the preoperative PNI is an intervenable clinical indicator. Future research is crucial to advance the understanding and improvement of the preoperative PNI.

We identified some limitations in our study: firstly, our study was conducted on a retrospective cohort in a single institute, which may have generated biases for the differences between groups and variability in diagnostic testing. Secondly, an evaluation was made between the preoperative laboratory parameters and the incidence of perioperative ischemic stroke, but there are other factors such as frailness and sarcopenia which have not been considered in this study, and could be taken into account to evaluate the nutritional status. Lastly, we were not able to determine the relationship between the specified parameters and the nutritional therapy given to the patients. Thus we recommend further studies to assess these issues.

Our study shows that low preoperative PNI is significantly associated with a higher incidence of ischemic stroke in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery. Preoperative PNI, a preoperative nutritional status evaluation index, is an independent risk factor to assess perioperative ischemic stroke risk, and could be used as an intervenable preoperative clinical biochemical index to reduce the incidence of perioperative ischemic stroke.

Conclusion

The preoperative PNI is an independent factor to predict perioperative ischemic stroke risk. PNI may be a biological marker to assess a patient’s chronic inflammatory and nutritional status, and it could be a useful predictive information and intervention target on perioperative ischemic stroke in non-cardiac surgery patients.

Availability of data and materials

The data supporting the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Abbreviations

OR:

Odds ratio

CI:

Confidence interval

PNI:

Prognostic nutritional index

SMD:

Standardized mean difference

PSM:

Propensity Score Matching

BMI:

Body mass index

COPD:

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

ASA:

American Society of Anaesthesiologists classification system

ACEI:

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors

ARB:

Angiotensin receptor blockers

LLR:

Leucocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio

E.N.T:

Otolaryngology head, and neck surgery

MAP:

Mean arterial pressure

NSAIDs:

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

References

  1. Woo SH, Marhefka GD, Cowan SW, Ackermann L. Development and validation of a prediction model for stroke, cardiac, and mortality risk after non-cardiac surgery. J Am Heart Assoc. 2021;10(4): e018013.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Selim M. Perioperative stroke. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(7):706–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Parikh S, Cohen JR. Perioperative stroke after general surgical procedures. N Y State J Med. 1993;93(3):162–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Landercasper J, Merz BJ, Cogbill TH, et al. Perioperative stroke risk in 173 consecutive patients with a past history of stroke. Arch Surg. 1990;125(8):986–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Endres M, Moro MA, Nolte CH, Dames C, Buckwalter MS, Meisel A. Immune pathways in etiology, acute phase, and chronic sequelae of ischemic stroke. Circ Res. 2022;130(8):1167–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Onodera T, Goseki N, Kosaki G. Prognostic nutritional index in gastrointestinal surgery of malnourished cancer patients. Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi. 1984;85(9):1001–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee JY, Kim HI, Kim YN, et al. Clinical significance of the prognostic nutritional index for predicting short- and long-term surgical outcomes after gastrectomy: a retrospective analysis of 7781 gastric cancer patients. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95(18): e3539.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Yang Y, Gao P, Song Y, et al. The prognostic nutritional index is a predictive indicator of prognosis and postoperative complications in gastric cancer: a meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016;42(8):1176–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Okada S, Shimada J, Kato D, Tsunezuka H, Teramukai S, Inoue M. Clinical significance of prognostic nutritional index after surgical treatment in lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2017;104(1):296–302.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cheng YL, Sung SH, Cheng HM, et al. Prognostic nutritional index and the risk of mortality in patients with acute heart failure. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017;6(6): e004876.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Raposeiras Roubín S, Abu Assi E, Cespón Fernandez M, et al. Prevalence and prognostic significance of malnutrition in patients with acute coronary syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;76(7):828–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hayashi J, Uchida T, Ri S, et al. Clinical significance of the prognostic nutritional index in patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020;68(8):774–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sim JH, Jun IG, Moon YJ, et al. Association of preoperative prognostic nutritional index and postoperative acute kidney injury in patients who underwent hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma. J Pers Med. 2021;11(5):428.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Yuan K, Zhu S, Wang H, et al. Association between malnutrition and long-term mortality in older adults with ischemic stroke. Clin Nutr. 2021;40(5):2535–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Starzer AM, Steindl A, Mair MJ, et al. Correction: Systemic inflammation scores correlate with survival prognosis in patients with newly diagnosed brain metastases. Br J Cancer. 2022;126(6):968.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Haller G, Bampoe S, Cook T, et al. Systematic review and consensus definitions for the standardised endpoints in perioperative medicine initiative: clinical indicators. Br J Anaesth. 2019;123(2):228–37.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Sacco RL, Kasner SE, Broderick JP, et al. An updated definition of stroke for the 21st century: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American heart association/American stroke association. Stroke. 2013;44(7):2064–89.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Diefenbach CS, Li H, Hong F, et al. Evaluation of the International Prognostic Score (IPS-7) and a Simpler Prognostic Score (IPS-3) for advanced Hodgkin lymphoma in the modern era. Br J Haematol. 2015;171(4):530–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Austin PC. An Introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies. Multivariate Behav Res. 2011;46(3):399–424.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Kristensen SD, Knuuti J, Saraste A, et al. 2014 ESC/ESA Guidelines on non-cardiac surgery: cardiovascular assessment and management: the joint task force on non-cardiac surgery: cardiovascular assessment and management of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Society of Anaesthesiology (ESA). Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2014;31(10):517–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Belayev L, Liu Y, Zhao W, Busto R, Ginsberg MD. Human albumin therapy of acute ischemic stroke: marked neuroprotective efficacy at moderate doses and with a broad therapeutic window. Stroke. 2001;32(2):553–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Mendes RS, Martins G, Oliveira MV, et al. Iso-Oncotic albumin mitigates brain and kidney injury in experimental focal ischemic stroke. Front Neurol. 2020;11:1001.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Seet RC, Lim EC, Chan BP, Ong BK. Serum albumin level as a predictor of ischemic stroke outcome. Stroke. 2004;35(11):2435–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Li S, Huang Y, Liu Y, et al. Change and predictive ability of circulating immunoregulatory lymphocytes in long-term outcomes of acute ischemic stroke. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2021;41(9):2280–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Kim J, Song TJ, Park JH, et al. Different prognostic value of white blood cell subtypes in patients with acute cerebral infarction. Atherosclerosis. 2012;222(2):464–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Tsai NW, Chang WN, Shaw CF, Jan CR, Lu CH. Leucocyte apoptosis in patients with acute ischaemic stroke. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2010;37(9):884–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kang MK, Kim TJ, Kim Y, et al. Geriatric nutritional risk index predicts poor outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke - automated undernutrition screen tool. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(2): e0228738.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Spence JD. Nutrition and Risk of Stroke. Nutrients. 2019;11(3):647.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Lock K, Smith RD, Dangour AD, et al. Health, agricultural, and economic effects of adoption of healthy diet recommendations. Lancet. 2010;376(9753):1699–709.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Dans A, Ng N, Varghese C, Tai ES, Firestone R, Bonita R. The rise of chronic non-communicable diseases in Southeast Asia: time for action. Lancet. 2011;377(9766):680–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Schuetz P, Fehr R, Baechli V, et al. Individualised nutritional support in medical inpatients at nutritional risk: a randomised clinical trial. Lancet. 2019;393(10188):2312–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Wei Wei and Yuting Zhou of Hangzhou Le9 Healthcare Technology Co., Ltd., for help in the clinical data collection of this study.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018YFC2001901), the Capital Health Research and Development of Special Fund (2022–4-5025).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Min Liu, Miao Sun and Ting Zhang contributed equally to this study.

  2. Yulong Ma, Weidong Mi and Guyan Wang contributed equally to this study.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Anesthesiology, The First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, China

    Min Liu, Miao Sun, Ting Zhang, Yanhong Liu, Yuxiang Song, Huikai Yang, Zhikang Zhou, Dandan Chang, Weidong Mi & Yulong Ma

  2. Department of Anesthesiology, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100730, China

    Min Liu & Guyan Wang

  3. Nation Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Diseases, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100730, China

    Min Liu, Weidong Mi & Yulong Ma

  4. Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jinzhou Medical University, Jinzhou, 121000, China

    Miao Sun

  5. Department of Anesthesiology, The Sixth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing , 100048, China

    Peng Li

  6. Hangzhou Le9 Healthcare Technology Co., Ltd, Hangzhou, 311200, China

    Jin Liu

  7. Department of Anesthesiology, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, 226001, China

    Siyuan Liu

Authors
  1. Min Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Miao Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ting Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Peng Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jin Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yanhong Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Yuxiang Song
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Siyuan Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Huikai Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Zhikang Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Dandan Chang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Guyan Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Weidong Mi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Yulong Ma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

YM, WM and GW designed this study and edited the manuscript. ML, MS and TZ conducted most of the experiments and drafted the manuscript. JL, YL and YS interpreted data and contributed to the statistical analysis. SL, HY, ZZ and DC prepared figures. PL contributed to the manuscript editing and statistical analysis. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Guyan Wang, Weidong Mi or Yulong Ma.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was following the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by Ethics Committee of Chinese PLA General Hospital (No. S2021-496–01), and the date of the research proposal was 1 March 2022. The requirement of written informed consent for patients was waived by Ethics Committee of Chinese PLA General Hospital, because the study was retrospective and all data were anonymous.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1:

Fig. S1. ROC curve of PNI for perioperative ischemic stroke. ROC, receiver operating characteristics curve; PNI, prognostic nutritional index. Fig. S2. ROC curve of LLR for perioperative ischemic stroke. ROC, receiver operating characteristics curve; LLR, leucocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio. Table 1. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses for perioperative ischemic stroke in the Model 1 and Model 2. Table 2. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses for perioperative ischemic stroke in the PS matching.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, M., Sun, M., Zhang, T. et al. Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) as a potential predictor and intervention target for perioperative ischemic stroke: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Anesthesiol 23, 268 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-023-02216-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-023-02216-8

Keywords

BMC Anesthesiology

ISSN: 1471-2253

Contact us