Skip to main content
Download PDF
Download ePub

Widening or narrowing income inequalities in myocardial infarction? Time trends in life years free of myocardial infarction and after incidence

Population Health Metrics volume 19, Article number: 47 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Despite substantial improvements in prevention and therapy, myocardial infarction (MI) remains a frequent health event, causing high mortality and serious health impairments. Previous research lacks evidence on how social inequalities in incidence and mortality risks developed over time, and on how these developments affect the lifespan free of MI and after MI in different social subgroups. This study investigates income inequalities in MI-free life years and life years after MI and whether these inequalities widened or narrowed over time.

Methods

The analyses are based on claims data of a large German health insurance provider insuring approximately 2.8 million individuals in the federal state Lower Saxony. Trends in income inequalities in incidence and mortality were assessed for all subjects aged 60 years and older by comparing the time periods 2006–2008 and 2015–2017 using multistate survival models. Trends in the number of life years free of MI and after MI were calculated separately for income groups by applying multistate life table analyses.

Results

MI incidence and mortality risks decreased over time, but declines were strongest among men and women in the higher-income group. While life years free of MI increased in men and women with higher incomes, no MI-free life years were gained in the low-income group. Among men, life years after MI increased irrespective of income group.

Conclusions

Income inequalities in the lifespan spent free of MI and after MI widened over time. In particular, men with low incomes are disadvantaged, as life years spent after MI increased, but no life years free of MI were gained.

Peer Review reports

Background

Myocardial infarction (MI) is one of the leading diseases in the elderly causing high mortality and serious health impairments [1, 2]. As a result of progressive arteriosclerosis, MI often results in rapid deterioration of cardiovascular health and is associated with long-term impairments in functional health, poor quality of life, and increased risks of recurrent MI and stroke [3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11]. Despite substantial improvements in prevention and treatment, population ageing and increased long-term survival after infarction are expected to lead to an increasing number of individuals living with impaired health after MI [7, 12]. Previous studies mainly focus on the development of incidence risks over time, but research on trends in average lifespan spent without and after MI is sparse and little is known about these trends with regard to social inequalities.

Due to the considerable progress in prevention and therapy, MI incidence has declined in recent decades [13,14,15,16,17]. According to Fries’ morbidity compression hypothesis [18, 19], improved prevention may lead to postponements of disease onset over time and to prolonged periods spent in good health. A recent study reported decreasing incidence rates and increasing age at MI onset among men, pointing towards morbidity compression [20]. On the other hand, improvements in therapy have increased survival rates after MI substantially [10, 13, 21, 22], thus leading to prolonged periods spent after MI and contributing to an expansion of morbidity [23]. For Germany, both decreasing incidence rates and mortality rates after MI onset have been reported [16, 24]. Therefore, it largely remains unclear whether a compression or an expansion has taken place among the German population and whether these developments depend on socioeconomic characteristics.

Numerous studies have emphasised the important role of social status in determining differences in the risk of MI between population subgroups [25,26,27,28,29,30]. Social inequalities in MI incidence and MI mortality were also reported for Germany [31,32,33]. The development of social inequalities in MI incidence over time in Germany has rarely been examined. One of the few existing studies found narrowing income inequalities in MI incidence risks in men aged 18 years and older, while no changes were reported in women [34].

However, research is still lacking on how the average lifespan spent free of MI and life years affected by MI developed over time and whether these trends differ between social subgroups. This study steps into this gap by investigating time trends in the number of life years free of MI and after MI incidence by income group. Special attention is paid to whether these time trends differ between income groups, causing narrowing or widening inequalities over time. The analyses are based on the data of a large German health insurance provider. The high case numbers make it possible to analyse the interplay between MI incidence and mortality developments over time in different income groups. In detail, the study was guided by the following research questions:

  • Are there income inequalities in MI incidence risks and mortality risks after MI and without MI? How did these inequalities develop over time?

  • Are there income inequalities in the number of life years spent free of MI and after MI incidence? Have these inequalities widened or narrowed over time?

Methods

Data

The study is based on claims data of a large German statutory health insurance provider, the AOK Niedersachsen (AOKN) insuring approximately one third of the total population of the federal state Lower Saxony [35]. The data were collected for accounting purposes and include in- and outpatient diagnoses coded according to the International Classification of Disease 10th revision (ICD-10), demographic and socioeconomic information and the date of death for all individuals deceased during the observation period. Previous analyses have shown that the data are representative for the total German population in terms of sex and age distribution, while individuals with higher incomes are underrepresented [36].

In Germany, health insurance (private or publicly-funded statutory insurance) is mandatory for all residents. Below a legally determined income threshold, private health insurance is only accessible to self-employed individuals and to government officials. Since this income limit is considerably higher than the average income in Germany, the vast majority (approximately 90%) is insured with one of the providers of the statutory health insurance system [37]. Within the statutory health insurance system, the health care coverage is the same for all individuals. Since all rendered medical services have to be reported to the insurer as a prerequisite for payment, claims data of the statutory health insurances depict health care activities fairly complete.

The data were available for the years 2005 to 2017. As the number of incident cases in MI and deaths after MI by income group is limited, single years of observation were combined into time periods. Therefore, time trends in incidence and mortality were analysed by comparing the two time periods 2006–2008 and 2015–2017. Since the number of deaths after MI and MI incident cases are limited in younger ages, the analyses are based on the insurance population aged 60 years and older.

Incidence

MI incidence was determined on the basis of the ICD-10 inpatient diagnoses I21.0 to I21.9. Incident cases were defined for individuals having a MI diagnosis in 2006–2008 or 2015–2017. To distinguish between incident and recurrent cases, look-back periods of 1 year preceding this diagnosis were applied that had to be free of MI in incident cases. Recurrent cases were excluded from all analyses performed in this study.

Income

In Germany, employers are obligated to report the pre-tax incomes of their employees to the statutory health insurance provider. Furthermore, the data contain information on pension payments received from the German Pension Fund and on unemployment benefits. Income groups were defined relative to the average pre-tax income in Germany of a given year reported by the Federal Statistical Office. In this way the grouping is taking varying income levels over time into account. Since the number of incident cases and deaths within the different subgroups is limited, the study population was classified into two groups. The low income group includes all individuals with an annual income ≤ 60% of the average income in Germany. Individuals having > 60% of the average income were assigned to the higher income group. Furthermore, incomes were adjusted for inflation, which allows direct comparability between years, as purchasing power is kept constant over time. Taking both periods together, the proportion of individuals with missing information on income amounted to 8%.

Statistical analyses

The analyses are based on multistate survival analyses using a three-state illness-death model. Within this model, three types of events are possible, which are defined by the following transitions: (1) MI-free to MI (the event of MI incidence), (2) MI-free to death (death without MI), and (3) MI to death (death after MI incidence).

In a first step, general income inequalities in incidence and mortality risks were analysed by proportional hazard models with constant baseline hazard over time. The models were stratified by sex and controlled for time period and age. Time trends of income inequalities in incidence and mortality risks were analysed in two steps: First, trends within income group were estimated separately for income group and sex. The models include a covariate for time period. Furthermore, changes in income inequalities in incidence and mortality risks were analysed. These analyses were based on interaction models (time period*income group) and were stratified by sex. Finally, time trends in the number of life years spent free of MI and after MI were calculated by multistate life table (MSLT) analyses. The development of the expected number of life years spent free of MI and after MI depends on the complex interplay between the development of incidence, mortality after MI and mortality without previous MI. Therefore, age-specific hazard rates of all three transitions have to be included in the MSLT analyses. These age-specific hazard rates were predicted from proportional hazard models with constant baseline hazard over time and included as input for the MSLT. The models are stratified by sex, income group, and time period and were fitted separately for each type of transition. All models contain a covariate for age in single-years age groups (centered to the middle of the age interval 60 to 95+ and included as second-degree polynomial), which varies with calendar year. The data management and the estimation of the survival models were performed with Stata MP 14.2 [38], the MSLT were calculated with R 3.5.1 [39]. All confidence intervals were estimated by drawing 1000 bootstrap samples (with replacement).

Results

In both periods, 35,037 MI incidences with 4,120,195 person-years at exposure and 169,980 deaths without MI with 4,120,227 person-years at exposure were observed. Among the MI incident individuals, a total number of 12,771 deaths occurred over an exposure time of 36,696 person-years. Age-unadjusted crude incidence rates per 1000 person-years of exposure remained largely stable between periods in men (10.99 in 2006–2008 to 11.03 in 2015–2017) but decreased in women (6.95 to 6.64). The crude death rates after MI decreased for both sexes (335.10 to 297.32 in men and 409.01 to 350.00 in women) (Table 1). Since the study population is limited to individuals aged 60 years and older and includes many individuals after retirement age, a considerable proportion of the individuals belong to the low-income group. This applies particularly to women reflecting the overall lower income level than in men (Table 1).

Table 1 Descriptive statistics on the number of insured individuals, exposures in person-years, and events by type of transition, sex, income group, and period
Full size table

Income inequalities in incidence and mortality risks

Overall, income inequalities in MI incidence and mortality risks are more pronounced in men than in women (Table 2). Compared to the low-income group, men in the higher-income group had a 14% lower risk of MI incidence, a 26% lower mortality risk without previous MI, and an 18% lower risk of death after MI. Among women, inequalities between income groups were small and were most pronounced in mortality without MI (HR = 0.94) (Table 2).

Table 2 Risks (HR) of myocardial infarction incidence, death without myocardial infarction, and death after myocardial infarction of the higher-income group compared to the low-income group by sex
Full size table

Time trends in incidence and mortality risks

Incidence risks decreased in all groups, with the exception of low-income men, for whom the risks remained quite constant over time (Fig. 1). Mortality risks without MI decreased in both income groups and for both sexes. The same holds for death after MI, where the decreases over time were strongest. In general, the decline of event risks tends to be stronger in the higher- than in the low-income group (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Time trends in risks of myocardial infarction incidence, death without myocardial infarction, and death after myocardial infarction by sex and income group (Hazard Ratios of time periods, reference: period 1 (2006–2008)). Hazard Ratios estimated by multistate survival models; 95%-CI bootstrapped (with replacement) using 1000 replications; all analyses are controlled for age in single-year age groups (as second-degree polynomial); MI myocardial infarction

Full size image

With respect to income inequalities in MI incidence risks, the gap tended to widen in women but remained largely constant in men. Widening income inequalities were also found in mortality without MI in both sexes. Despite a tendency towards increasing inequalities in death after MI, the change over time remained limited leading to rather constant inequalities over time (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Income inequalities in risks of myocardial infarction incidence, death without myocardial infarction, and death after myocardial infarction by sex (Reference: low income, period 1 (2006–2008)). Hazard Ratios were estimated from multistate survival models including the interaction income group*period; 95%-CI bootstrapped (with replacement) using 1000 replications; * significant interaction term (income group*period) based on 95% CIs; all analyses are controlled for age in single-year age groups (as second-degree polynomial); MI myocardial infarction

Full size image

Time trends in life years free of MI and after MI

Calculations of the number of life years free of MI and after MI incidence are based on age-specific hazard rates predicted by multistate survival models of the three transitions to smooth fluctuations. Additional files 1 and 2 allow for a comparison between the observed rates and the predicted rates. Overall, the predicted rates fit the observed rates pretty well. Due to the limited number of cases at older ages, the observed rates fluctuated more strongly above age 80. These fluctuations were smoothed by the predicted rates (Additional files 1 and 2).

Figure 3 shows the expected number of remaining life years free of MI and after MI at age 60. While the expected number of MI-free life years in the first period is similar in women of both income groups, considerable inequalities were found among men. Between the periods, the number of MI-free life years increased by 0.8 years for men of the higher-income group (18.8 to 19.6), while it remained stable in low-income men. Among women, these time trends are very similar, since only women with higher incomes benefitted from an increase in life years free of MI (23.1 to 23.9). The number of life years after MI incidence is almost identical in both income groups. This applies to both sexes. Due to the increased survival after MI, the number of life years after MI increased in men of both income groups (0.78 to 1.04 in the low- and 0.79 to 1.02 in the higher-income group). For women, no changes over time were found.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Expected number of life years free of myocardial infarction and after myocardial infarction at age 60 by sex, income group and time period. Period 2006–2008 in darker colours, period 2015–2017 in lighter colours, 95%-CI bootstrapped (with replacement) using 1000 replications; * Significant difference in the number of life years between the two periods based on 95%-CIs (bootstrapped, using 1000 replications); MI myocardial infarction

Full size image

Discussion

This study investigated time trends in income inequalities in MI-related health expectancies of individuals aged 60 years and older based on German health insurance data. The study has shown that income inequalities in the expected length of life spent free of MI and after disease onset have widened over time. Driven by the stronger decline in incidence in women and mortality risks without previous MI in both sexes, the number of MI-free life years increased among the higher-income group while no life years free of MI were gained among individuals belonging to the low-income group. Due to the clear decline in mortality rates after MI, the expected lifespan after incidence increased for men irrespective of income group. As no MI-free life years were gained among men with low incomes, the relative proportion of life years after MI increased more strongly than in men with higher incomes. In contrast, the number of life years after MI remained constant in women as the decreases in incidence rates were counterbalanced by the declining mortality rates after MI.

Our results are in line with the general trend towards declining MI incidence rates and improved survival after MI reported in many other studies [10, 13,14,15,16,17, 21, 22]. While the trend towards decreasing incidence and general mortality leads to gains in life years spent free of MI, the decline in mortality after MI fosters extended periods in ill health. Studies aimed at analysing whether compression or expansion has occurred over time need therefore to focus on the interplay of trends in incidence and mortality without and after disease onset. With respect to income inequalities, our findings indicate that differences in MI incidence and mortality between income groups are substantial in men but less pronounced in women, which is in accordance with a recent study on inequalities among individuals aged 18 years and older of the same insurance population [34]. However, the analyses also show that time trends in MI incidence and mortality risks tend to differ by income group, leading to different trends in life years spent free of MI and after MI incidence between income groups. Due to the decline in mortality risks after MI among men, the number of life years spent after MI increased in both income groups. This expansion was most pronounced among men belonging to the low- income group as no life years free of MI were gained. Among women, the number of life years after MI remained largely the same in both income groups. However, due to the increase in MI-free life years, the relative proportion of years spent after MI decreased among women belonging to the higher-income group, pointing towards morbidity compression. Due to these differences between income groups, inequalities also widened in women.

The trend towards widening inequalities may be driven by differing trends in cardiovascular risk factors and health-related behaviour. For Germany, decreasing prevalence of hypertension, hyperglycaemia, hyperlipidaemia, smoking, and physical inactivity have been reported [40,41,42]. So far, research investigating changes in cardiovascular risk factors with respect to socio-economic status (SES) group among the German population is rare, but increasing inequalities were reported for smoking in men [43] and physical inactivity in both sexes [44], which may have fostered the stronger increase in MI-free life years among higher-income groups. Sharing similar risk factors and pathomechanisms, increasing inequalities in stroke-free life years have also been found for German men [45]. Over the last decades, the income gap in Germany has been rising constantly [46]. This suggests that in the future a growing proportion of the population will fall into the low-income group and will therefore be particularly disadvantaged in terms of health and life expectancy [47]. This additionally exacerbates the effect of growing inequalities in health expectancies and stresses the importance of further research on trends in risk factors and public health efforts aiming to reduce health inequalities and harmful health behaviour in vulnerable social groups.

Our findings on income gradients are in line with a previous study of Geyer et al. based on the same data source that reported strong inequalities in MI incidence among men but not in women [34]. With respect to differences in time trends in the low and higher income groups, however, the results differ for men as the strongest declines in incidence risks were found in men with low incomes [34]. This discrepancy may be explained by differences in the study population. While Geyer et al. focused on the full age range of the adult population (age 18 and above), the present study examines population health among the elderly and therefore depicts trends in the population subgroup carrying the main burden of MI morbidity. The results of the two studies suggest, however, that premature MIs also contribute significantly to inequalities in cardiovascular health in the population and that time trends between premature MIs and MIs in the main disease age may differ. However, due to the limited number of incident cases below age 60, differences in trends in the number of life years free of MI and after incidence could not be analysed in this study. Further research should investigate these differences in more detail.

Previous research has shown that trends in incidence and the general mortality after MI differ between ST segment elevation (STEMI) and non-STEMI MIs [13]. However, since the ICD-10 classification system does not allow a precise distinction between STEMI and non-STEMI MIs, these differences could not be considered in our study. Previous results also suggest that the degree of long-term impairments caused by MI may not be the same between SES groups as functional recovery was found to be greatest in patients with high SES [48]. Including analyses on social inequalities in functional impairments or quality of life after MI would have provided a deeper insight into trends in the burden of MI. However, as claims data do not contain the information needed to determine one of the common indices for measuring long-term functional impairments or self-perceived health-related quality of life, this issue could not be addressed.

Strengths and limitations

The study is based on large numbers of incident cases and deaths with and without previous MI, which allowed robust estimates of the risks of all three events, even if the analyses are performed separately for income group and sex. The precise information on dates of MI and death available in the data allows to determine the exact order of events, which is necessary when performing multistate survival analyses. Moreover, the data include the complete insurance population, irrespective of health condition. Therefore, the analyses are unaffected by health-related non-response, which may occur in survey data if individuals do not participate in the study due to ill health.

With respect to age and sex distributions, the data are representative for the total German population [36] but differ in terms of social structure as individuals with high incomes are underrepresented. This has been taken into account since all analyses are stratified by income group. As premium payments depend on income level, information on individual income is available for the insured individuals being an active part of the labour force, receiving unemployment benefits, or receiving pension payments from the German Pension Fund. Individuals who are not part of the labour force and are not retired were excluded from the analyses as information on income is missing. However, as the study population is limited to the age group 60 and above and the majority belongs to the group of retired individuals, income information is available for the vast majority of the study population (92%).

In our study, recurrent cases of MI were identified using a look-back period of one year. Previous research shows that most of the recurrent MIs occur in the first year after the first MI [10, 49] and it can therefore be assumed that a substantial share of recurrent MIs was identified. Nevertheless, using this approach a certain proportion of recurrent MIs cannot be identified. Longer look-back periods would have reduced this proportion. However, a recent study has shown that there is always a trade-off between the length of look-back periods and the resulting shift in the socio-demographic structure of the insurance population [50]. This shift is caused by more rigorous preconditions on the length of the observation time, which must be met when longer look-back periods are applied. Therefore, individuals with shorter insurance histories would have to be excluded, leading to an increasingly selective study population. However, the shift in the sociodemographic distribution remains minor when look-back periods of one year are applied [50].

Conclusions

This study shows that the general trend of declining MI incidence and mortality rates is accompanied by increasing social inequalities in the length of life free of MI and in the life years affected by MI. While incidence and mortality risks declined in all income groups, decreases were most pronounced in the higher-income group. This led to a growing disadvantage of individuals with low SES. This applies especially to men with low incomes, as the lifespan spent after MI expanded but no healthy years were gained over time. Further research is needed on social inequalities in long-term functional limitations and quality of life after MI and on whether the burden of these impairments developed similarly in the different SES groups.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and analysed during the current study are not publicly available due to protection of data privacy of the insured individuals by the Statutory Local Health Insurance of Lower Saxony (AOK Niedersachsen).

Abbreviations

MI:

Myocardial infarction

AOKN:

AOK Niedersachsen

ICD-10:

International Classification of Disease 10th revision

MSLT:

Multistate life table

STEMI:

ST segment elevation

SES:

Socio-economic status

References

  1. Johansson S, Rosengren A, Young K, Jennings E. Mortality and morbidity trends after the first year in survivors of acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2017;17(1):53. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-017-0482-9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Smolina K, Wright FL, Rayner M, Goldacre MJ. Determinants of the decline in mortality from acute myocardial infarction in England between 2002 and 2010: linked national database study. BMJ (Clinical research ed.). 2012;344:d8059. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d8059

  3. Quinones PA, Seidl H, Holle R, et al. New potential determinants of disability in aged persons with myocardial infarction: results from the KORINNA-study. BMC Geriatr. 2014;14:34. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2318-14-34.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Dodson JA, Arnold SV, Reid KJ, et al. Physical function and independence 1 year after myocardial infarction: observations from the Translational Research Investigating Underlying disparities in recovery from acute Myocardial infarction: Patients’ Health status registry. Am Heart J. 2012;163(5):790–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Levine DA, Davydow DS, Hough CL, Langa KM, Rogers MA, Iwashyna TJ. Functional disability and cognitive impairment after hospitalization for myocardial infarction and stroke. Circ: Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2014;7(6):863–71.

  6. Jernberg T, Hasvold P, Henriksson M, Hjelm H, Thuresson M, Janzon M. Cardiovascular risk in post-myocardial infarction patients: nationwide real world data demonstrate the importance of a long-term perspective. Eur Heart J. 2015;36(19):1163–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Moran AE, Forouzanfar MH, Roth GA, et al. The global burden of ischemic heart disease in 1990 and 2010: the Global Burden of Disease 2010 study. Circulation. 2014;129(14):1493–501. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.113.004046.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Munyombwe T, Hall M, Dondo TB, et al. Quality of life trajectories in survivors of acute myocardial infarction: a national longitudinal study. Heart. 2020;106(1):33–9. https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2019-315510.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Morys JM, Bellwon J, Hofer S, Rynkiewicz A, Gruchala M. Quality of life in patients with coronary heart disease after myocardial infarction and with ischemic heart failure. Arch Med Sci: AMS. 2016;12(2):326–33. https://doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2014.47881.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Smolina K, Wright FL, Rayner M, Goldacre MJ. Long-term survival and recurrence after acute myocardial infarction in England, 2004 to 2010. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012;5(4):532–40. https://doi.org/10.1161/circoutcomes.111.964700.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Schweikert B, Hunger M, Meisinger C, König H-H, Gapp O, Holle R. Quality of life several years after myocardial infarction: comparing the MONICA/KORA registry to the general population. Eur Heart J. 2009;30(4):436–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Heidenreich PA, Trogdon JG, Khavjou OA, et al. Forecasting the future of cardiovascular disease in the United States: a policy statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2011;123(8):933–44. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0b013e31820a55f5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Smedegaard L, Charlot MG, Gislason GH, Hansen PR. Temporal trends in acute myocardial infarction presentation and association with use of cardioprotective drugs: a nationwide registry-based study. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2018;4(2):93–101. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjcvp/pvx016.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mozaffarian D, Benjamin EJ, Go AS, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics–2015 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2015;131(4):e29-322. https://doi.org/10.1161/cir.0000000000000152.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gerber Y, Weston SA, Jiang R, Roger VL. The changing epidemiology of myocardial infarction in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1995–2012. Am J Med. 2015;128(2):144–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2014.09.012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dégano IR, Salomaa V, Veronesi G, et al. Twenty-five-year trends in myocardial infarction attack and mortality rates, and case-fatality, in six European populations. Heart. 2015;101(17):1413–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rosamond WD, Chambless LE, Heiss G, et al. Twenty-two-year trends in incidence of myocardial infarction, coronary heart disease mortality, and case fatality in 4 US communities, 1987–2008. Circulation. 2012;125(15):1848–57. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.111.047480.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Fries JF. Aging, natural death, and the compression of morbidity. N Engl J Med. 1980;303(3):130–5. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm198007173030304.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Fries JF. The theory and practice of active aging. Curr Gerontol Geriatr Res. 2012;2012:420637. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/420637.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Geyer S, Eberhard S, Schmidt BMW, Epping J, Tetzlaff J. Morbidity compression in myocardial infarction 2006 to 2015 in terms of changing rates and age at occurrence: a longitudinal study using claims data from Germany. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(8):e0202631. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202631.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Rahimi K, Duncan M, Pitcher A, Emdin CA, Goldacre MJ. Mortality from heart failure, acute myocardial infarction and other ischaemic heart disease in England and Oxford: a trend study of multiple-cause-coded death certification. J Epidemiol Commun Health. 2015;69(10):1000–5. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2015-205689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Szummer K, Wallentin L, Lindhagen L, et al. Improved outcomes in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction during the last 20 years are related to implementation of evidence-based treatments: experiences from the SWEDEHEART registry 1995–2014. Eur Heart J. 2017;38(41):3056–65. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehx515.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Gruenberg EM. The failures of success. The Milbank Memorial Fund quarterly. Health Soc. 1977;55(1):3–24.

  24. Neumann JT, Gossling A, Sorensen NA, Blankenberg S, Magnussen C, Westermann D. Temporal trends in incidence and outcome of acute coronary syndrome. Clin Res Cardiol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-020-01612-1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Manrique-Garcia E, Sidorchuk A, Hallqvist J, Moradi T. Socioeconomic position and incidence of acute myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2011;65(4):301–9. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2009.104075.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Igland J, Vollset SE, Nygard OK, Sulo G, Ebbing M, Tell GS. Educational inequalities in acute myocardial infarction incidence in Norway: a nationwide cohort study. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(9):e106898. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0106898.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Malki N, Koupil I, Eloranta S, et al. Temporal trends in incidence of myocardial infarction and ischemic stroke by socioeconomic position in Sweden 1987–2010. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(8):e105279. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105279.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Kilpi F, Silventoinen K, Konttinen H, Martikainen P. Disentangling the relative importance of different socioeconomic resources for myocardial infarction incidence and survival: a longitudinal study of over 300 000 Finnish adults. Eur J Pub Health. 2015;26(2):260–6. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckv202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Christensen AV, Koch MB, Davidsen M, Jensen GB, Andersen LV, Juel K. Educational inequality in cardiovascular disease depends on diagnosis: a nationwide register based study from Denmark. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2016;23(8):826–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/2047487315613665.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kilpi F, Silventoinen K, Konttinen H, Martikainen P. Early-life and adult socioeconomic determinants of myocardial infarction incidence and fatality. Soc Sci Med. 1982;2017(177):100–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.01.055.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kirchberger I, Meisinger C, Goluke H, et al. Long-term survival among older patients with myocardial infarction differs by educational level: results from the MONICA/KORA myocardial infarction registry. Int J Equity Health. 2014;13:19. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-9276-13-19.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Braig S, Peter R, Nagel G, Hermann S, Rohrmann S, Linseisen J. The impact of social status inconsistency on cardiovascular risk factors, myocardial infarction and stroke in the EPIC-Heidelberg cohort. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:104. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-104.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Hanefeld C, Haschemi A, Lampert T, et al. Social gradients in myocardial infarction and stroke diagnoses in emergency medicine. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2018;115(4):41–8. https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2018.0041.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Geyer S, Tetzlaff J, Eberhard S, Sperlich S, Epping J. Health inequalities in terms of myocardial infarction and all-cause mortality: a study with German claims data covering 2006 to 2015. Int J Public Health. 2019;64(3):387–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-019-01224-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. AOK Niedersachsen. Geschäftsbericht 2018. 2019. https://www.aok.de/pk/fileadmin/user_upload/AOK-Niedersachsen/05-Content-PDF/Geschaeftsbericht-AOK-Niedersachsen.pdf. Accessed 31 March 2020.

  36. Jaunzeme J, Eberhard S, Geyer S. How, “representative” are SHI (statutory health insurance) data? Demographic and social differences and similarities between an SHI-insured population, the population of Lower Saxony, and that of the Federal Republic of Germany using the example of the AOK in Lower Saxony. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2013;56(3):447–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00103-012-1626-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Statistisches Bundesamt. Sozialleistungen. Angaben zur Krankenversicherung (Ergebnisse des Mikrozensus). Wiesbaden2015. https://www.destatis.de/Migration/DE/Publikationen/Thematisch/Bevoelkerung/HaushalteMikrozensus/KrankenversicherungMikrozensus.html. Accessed 15 Feb 2020.

  38. Stata_Corp. Stata statistical software. Release 14: Stata Corp, College Station; 2015.

  39. R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria 2015.

  40. Lampert T, Mensink G, Müters S. Physical and sporting activity among adults in Germany. Results from the "German Health Update 2009" survey. Bundesgesundheitsblatt-Gesundheitsforschung-Gesundheitsschutz. 2012;55(1):102–10.

  41. Finger J, Busch M, Du Y, et al. Time trends in cardiometabolic risk factors in adults—results from three nationwide German examination surveys from 1990–2011 Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2016;113:712–9. doi: https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2016.0712

  42. Zeiher J, Finger JD, Kuntz B, Hoebel J, Lampert T, Starker A. Trends in smoking among adults in Germany: Evidence from seven population-based health surveys from 1991–2015. Bundesgesundheitsblatt-Gesundheitsforschung-Gesundheitsschutz. 2018;61(11):1365–76.

  43. Hoebel J, Kuntz B, Kroll LE, et al. Trends in Absolute and Relative Educational Inequalities in Adult Smoking Since the Early 2000s: The Case of Germany. Nicotine Tobacco Res. 2018;20(3):295–302. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntx087.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Hoebel J, Finger JD, Kuntz B, et al. Changing educational inequalities in sporting inactivity among adults in Germany: a trend study from 2003 to 2012. BMC Public Health. 2017;17(1):547. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4478-2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Tetzlaff J, Geyer S, Tetzlaff F, Epping J. Income inequalities in stroke incidence and mortality: Trends in stroke-free and stroke-affected life years based on German health insurance data. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(1):e0227541. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227541.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung, Statistisches Bundesamt (Destatis). Ein Sozialbericht für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland, Datenreport 2018 Bd. 2018. Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB), Bonn. https://www.destatis.de/DE/Service/Statistik-Campus/Datenreport/Downloads/datenreport-2018.pdf?__blob=publicationFile. Accessed 19 Oct 2020.

  47. Tetzlaff F, Epping J, Sperlich S, Tetzlaff J. Widening income inequalities in life expectancy? Analysing time trends based on German health insurance data. Journal of epidemiology and community health. 2020:jech-2019–212966.

  48. Alter DA, Franklin B, Ko DT, et al. Socioeconomic status, functional recovery, and long-term mortality among patients surviving acute myocardial infarction. PLoS ONE. 2014;8(6):e65130. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065130.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Nedkoff L, Atkins E, Knuiman M, Sanfilippo FM, Rankin J, Hung J. Age-specific gender differences in long-term recurrence and mortality following incident myocardial infarction: a population-based study. Heart Lung Circ. 2015;24(5):442–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Epping J, Geyer S, Tetzlaff J. The effects of different lookback periods on the sociodemographic structure of the study population and on the estimation of incidence rates: analyses with German claims data. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020;20(1):229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the AOK Niedersachsen (Statutory Local Health Insurance of Lower Saxony) for providing the data. In particular, the support of Dr. Jürgen Peter, Dr. Jona Stahmeyer, and Dr. Sveja Eberhard made it possible to carry out this study.

Funding

Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. JT’s work is supported by the AOK Niedersachsen (Statutory Local Health Insurance of Lower Saxony) [grant number: not applicable] as part of an ongoing project on morbidity compression. JE’s work is supported by the German Research Foundation (DFG) [grant number: GE 1167/15–1].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Medical Sociology Unit, Hannover Medical School, Hanover, Germany

    Juliane Tetzlaff, Siegfried Geyer, Stefanie Sperlich & Jelena Epping

  2. Institute for General Practice, Hannover Medical School, Hanover, Germany

    Fabian Tetzlaff

Authors
  1. Juliane Tetzlaff
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Fabian Tetzlaff
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Siegfried Geyer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Stefanie Sperlich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jelena Epping
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization: JT, JE, FT. Formal analysis: JT, JE, FT. Methodology: JT, FT. Supervision: JE. Validation: JT, FT, SSp. Visualization: JT. Writing – original draft: JT. Writing—review & editing: JT, JE, FT, SG, SSp. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juliane Tetzlaff.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Our study is based on claims data, i.e., on routinely collected data of a statutory health insurance provider. We confirm that all data are fully anonymised before we accessed them. The use of this sort of data for scientific purposes is regulated by federal law. The data protection officer of the Statutory Local Health Insurance of Lower Saxony (AOK Niedersachsen) has approved its use.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1

. Observed and predicted hazard rates of (a) incidence of myocardial infarction, (b) death without myocardial infarction, and (c) death after myocardial infarction for men of the low-income group (≤60% of the average income in Germany, left) and of the higher-income group (>60% of the average income in Germany ,right) by period. Predicted hazard rates are derived from proportional hazard multistate survival models with constant baseline hazards; all survival models are controlled for age in single-year age groups (as second-degree polynomial)

Additional file 2.

Observed and predicted hazard rates of (a) incidence of myocardial infarction, (b) death without myocardial infarction, and (c) death after myocardial infarction for women of the low-income group (≤60% of the average income in Germany, left) and of the higher-income group (>60% of the average income in Germany ,right) by period. Predicted hazard rates are derived from proportional hazard multistate survival models with constant baseline hazards; all survival models are controlled for age in single-year age groups (as second-degree polynomial)

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tetzlaff, J., Tetzlaff, F., Geyer, S. et al. Widening or narrowing income inequalities in myocardial infarction? Time trends in life years free of myocardial infarction and after incidence. Popul Health Metrics 19, 47 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12963-021-00280-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12963-021-00280-1

Keywords

Population Health Metrics

ISSN: 1478-7954