Skip to main content
Download PDF

Polymorphism and selection of rpoS in pathogenic Escherichia coli

BMC Microbiology volume 9, Article number: 118 (2009) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Though RpoS is important for survival of pathogenic Escherichia coli in natural environments, polymorphism in the rpoS gene is common. However, the causes of this polymorphism and consequential physiological effects on gene expression in pathogenic strains are not fully understood.

Results

In this study, we found that growth on non-preferred carbon sources can efficiently select for loss of RpoS in seven of ten representative verocytotoxin-producing E. coli (VTEC) strains. Mutants (Suc++) forming large colonies on succinate were isolated at a frequency of 10-8 mutants per cell plated. Strain O157:H7 EDL933 yielded mainly mutants (about 90%) that were impaired in catalase expression, suggesting the loss of RpoS function. As expected, inactivating mutations in rpoS sequence were identified in these mutants. Expression of two pathogenicity-related phenotypes, cell adherence and RDAR (r ed d ry a nd r ough) morphotype, were also attenuated, indicating positive control by RpoS. For the other Suc++ mutants (10%) that were catalase positive, no mutation in rpoS was detected.

Conclusion

The selection for loss of RpoS on poor carbon sources is also operant in most pathogenic strains, and thus is likely responsible for the occurrence of rpoS polymorphisms among E. coli isolates.

Background

Adaptation is important for survival of bacteria in various natural environments, but the underlying mechanisms are not fully understood. Bacteria are often present in large communities (e.g., biofilm [1]) in nature, and adaptation can occur at population levels. An important adaptive strategy is the generation of variants to maximize bacteria fitness at the population level in response to fluctuating environments [2, 3]. These variants may result from spontaneous mutations selected within a population or from non-genetic changes. For example, to evade host immune system, some pathogens can alter surface antigen structure [4], termed phase variation [4, 5], through revertible high frequency mutation of genes encoding surface proteins [2, 5]. Bacteria also exhibit cell-to-cell variation in gene expression, termed individuality [2], even in an isogenic population. For example, under suboptimal induction conditions, the lac operon in Escherichia coli exhibits two distinct expression states, either fully induced or non-induced, but not an intermediate [6]. Gene expression noise due to stochastic events also results in phenotypic variation within isogenic E. coli populations [2, 7]. Both genetic selection and individuality are likely important for bacterial adaptation in natural environments [2].

An important adaptation regulator is the alternative sigma factor RpoS widely found in E. coli and many other proteobacteria [8, 9]. RpoS controls a large regulon [10–14] and plays a critical role in survival against stresses, such as prolonged starvation [15], low pH [16], thermal stress [17], near-UV exposure [18] and oxidative stress [18]. Despite the importance of RpoS, many attenuating mutations in the rpoS gene have been identified in both laboratory and natural E. coli strains. For example, some K12 strains possess an amber mutation (TAG) at codon 33 [19], while others have Glu (GAG), Tyr (TAT), or Gln (GAG) at the same position [19, 20]. GAG is commonly found in natural non-K12 E. coli isolates [19, 20]. Mutations in rpoS have also been identified in Shiga-like toxin-producing E. coli strains [21].

Polymorphism of rpoS appears to be paradoxical to the central role that RpoS plays in survival. Mutants of rpoS can be selected under nutrient limitation and exhibit enhanced metabolic potential [22], suggesting a regulatory trade-off for fitness between stress resistance and nutrient scavenging [22]. Growth on weak acids, including succinate [23] and acetate [24], strongly selects for mutations in rpoS in laboratory E. coli strains [23]. Considering that the weak acid (e.g., acetate) concentration is relatively high in human colon (80 mM) where E. coli colonize [25, 26], E. coli may face a similar selective pressure within the host environment. Selection for loss and gain of RpoS function may be an important adaptive mechanism, like phase variation, to ensure that E. coli can survive in complex natural environments.

However, whether this selection is responsible for the observed rpoS polymorphism in natural E. coli isolates remains unclear, primarily because most studies have been done with laboratory E. coli K12 strains. The genomes of E. coli isolates differ substantially and constitute a pangenome consisting of 13,000 genes, of which 2,200 genes are conserved among all isolates [27]. Since RpoS mostly controls expression of genes encoding non-essential functions [8, 9, 12, 13], RpoS likely plays a considerable role in the expression of non-conserved genes in the pangenome. Given that E. coli K12 strains only possess about 1/3 of all genes found in the pangenome of E. coli [27], it is possible that rpoS selection is limited to laboratory strains. Interestingly, selection for rpoS could not be observed in a natural E. coli isolate ECOR10 under nutrient limitation (see Fig 5 in [22]).

In this study, we wished to address three outstanding questions. First, can rpoS mutants be selected in clinical strains isolated from natural environments? Of particular interest is whether this selection occurs in pathogenic strains, which may have important medical relevance because of the potential role of RpoS in bacterial pathogenesis. Second, are there other factors involved in the selection for enhanced metabolic abilities in natural strains? Finally, is there any evidence that this selection occurs in natural environments? To address these questions, we employed a succinate selection strategy as a tool [23] and examined the selection using a group of ten representative verocytotoxin-producing E. coli (VTEC) strains from all five identified seropathotypes as our model strains. VTEC strains, including the O157:H7 serotype, are responsible for most E. coli foodborne outbreaks and can cause severe diseases, including diarrhea, hemorrhagic colitis and the hemolytic uremic syndrome [28]. Our results show that the selection for loss of RpoS is operant in most pathogenic E. coli strains. Virulence traits including RDAR morphotype and cell adherence were attenuated as a result of rpoS mutations. In addition, although rpoS mutants constituted most of the metabolic enhanced mutants, there was a small fraction of mutants that had intact RpoS function, indicating that other factors can also increase metabolic potential under conditions examined. Interestingly, three of ten tested VTEC strains grew well on succinate, and no growth-enhanced mutants could be selected. One of these three strains possessed a null rpoS mutation. This indicates that an adaptation to poor carbon source may have occurred in natural E. coli populations.

Results

Polymorphisms of rpoS in wild type VTEC strains

The ten representative VTEC strains examined in this study (Table 1) belong to five seropathotypes that have been categorized on the basis of virulence and outbreak frequency [29]. To test whether selection for loss of RpoS function can occur in these isolates, we first examined the rpoS sequences of these strains. Many nucleotide base substitutions were found in rpoS (Table 2). However, these substitutions did not result in changes in protein sequence, except for a single transversion (G to T) in strain N99-4390 which formed a premature stop codon, resulting in a loss of 86 amino acids at the C-terminal end of RpoS. As expression of catalase HPII encoded by katE is highly RpoS-dependent [30, 31], catalase production in all strains could be used to assess RpoS activity using plate catalase assays. Only N99-4390 exhibited a low catalase activity, consistent with the expected effect of the identified mutation in this strain. All tested VTEC strains were found to have a GAG at codon 33, in contrast to CAG in the laboratory K12 strain MG1655 (Table 2).

Table 1 Suc++ mutants selected from VTEC strains with attenuated or intact RpoS functions.
Full size table
Table 2 Polymorphic codons in rpoS among VTEC strains.
Full size table

Selection of Suc++ mutants

Our primary goal was to determine if loss of RpoS in VTEC strains can be selected by growing cells on non-preferred carbon sources. Mutants forming large colonies (Suc++) were readily isolated from seven of ten tested strains at a frequency of 10-8 per cell plated on succinate media, consistent with the frequencies obtained for laboratory strains [23]. Interestingly, strains CL3, R82F2 and N99-4390 grew uniformly well on succinate plates, much better than the other wild type strains, thus no Suc++ mutants were obtained. Similar results were obtained by growing cells on fumarate, another TCA cycle intermediate (data not shown), indicating that this selection is not limited to succinate alone.

A group of 12 independent representative Suc++ mutants were selected from each strain to test their RpoS status using catalase plate assays [23]. Most of the Suc++ mutants (depending on parental strain background) were impaired in catalase production (Table 1). In E. coli, there are two catalases, HPI (KatG) and HPII (KatE), but only catalase HPII (KatE) is highly RpoS-dependent [23]. To confirm the plate assay results and to differentiate between the expression of KatE and KatG, we tested the catalase activity in the isolated catalase-negative Suc++ mutants from three representative VTEC strains EDL933, CL106, and EC3-377 using native-PAGE gels. As expected, all Suc++ mutants exhibited substantially reduced HPII catalase activity (Figure 1A). The higher expression of HPI in Suc++ mutants (Figure 1A) is not entirely unexpected. Low levels of HPII may lead to higher accumulation of intracellular hydrogen peroxide which can activate OxyR, the main regulator of HPI [32].

Figure 1
figure 1

Catalase activity and RpoS expression in representative Suc++ mutants of VTEC strains EDL933, CL106 and EC3-377. (A) Samples were separated by native PAGE and stained for catalase activity. Catalase HPI (KatG) and HPII (KatE) are indicated. (B) Expression of RpoS and RpoS-regulated AppA by Western analysis. Mutations in rpoS were identified in these tested Suc++ mutants by sequencing, and sequences are provided in Supplemental material Figure S1 and Figure S2. To confirm equal protein loading, identical gels were run in parallel and stained by Coomassie Blue R-250 [14, 71].

Full size image

The enhanced growth of Suc++ mutants was assessed in liquid media by comparing the growth of wild type EDL933 and the derived mutants. There was no difference between growth of mutants and wild type cultures on glucose. However, growth of wild type strains on succinate was much lower compared with that of mutant strains, with a 10-fold longer generation time (Table 3). In addition, the Suc++ mutants grew similarly to an rpoS-null deletion mutant on succinate and glucose (Table 3).

Table 3 Growth of EDL933 and isogenic mutants in M9 minimal media with glucose, succinate, fumarate or malate as the sole carbon source.
Full size table

Characterization of rpoS mutations in Suc++ mutants

To determine if the loss of RpoS function in Suc++ mutants resulted from acquired mutations in rpoS, the rpoS region of VTEC Suc++ mutants exhibiting catalase deficiency was amplified and sequenced in both directions. Inactivating mutations, predicted to result in premature termination of RpoS, were identified in the rpoS gene in all the Suc++ catalase deficient mutants (see Additional files 1 and 2). These acquired mutations included transitions, transversions, deletions and duplications (see Additional files 1 and 2). To ensure that enhanced growth on succinate was attributable to acquisition of rpoS mutations (rather than to secondary mutations), selected Suc++ mutants carrying rpoS null mutations were complemented with a plasmid-borne functional rpoS [33]. As expected, the growth of transformed cells on succinate was much slower than that of the Suc++ parental strains, confirming that acquired mutations in rpoS are responsible for the enhanced growth of Suc++ mutants (data not shown). To examine the effect of mutation on RpoS levels, Western analysis using polyclonal antisera to RpoS was performed. In the selected representative Suc++ mutants (see Additional file 2), RpoS protein was absent (Figure 1B). In addition, the expression of AppA, a RpoS-dependent protein which has both acid phosphatase and phytase activities [34, 35], was substantially decreased in Suc++ mutants to about 25% of the expression level in isogenic wild type strains (Figure 1B).

Growth of VTEC strains and derivative Suc++ mutants under aerobic and anaerobic conditions

Effective utilization of succinate as a carbon source depends on the availability of an external electron receptor such as oxygen. However, in the human intestine, low oxygen tension permits E. coli to grow by fermentation or respiration using an alternative electron acceptor. As nitrate is readily available in the human intestine (14 μmol/kg [36]) and can be readily utilized by intestinal bacterial flora including E. coli [37, 38] we examined succinate selection using this alternate electron receptor. Interestingly, host nitrate synthesis can be stimulated in response to infections caused by gastroenteric pathogens [38]. To test if selection for loss of RpoS can occur under low oxygen conditions, cultures were grown in anaerobic jars (see Methods). We first compared the anaerobic growth of wild type and aerobically-selected Suc++ mutants on glucose and succinate plates. Wild type EDL933 grew as well as an isogenic rpoS knockout mutant and derivative Suc++ mutants on glucose, while the rpoS and Suc++ mutants grew much better than wild type on succinate under both aerobic and anaerobic conditions (Figure 2). The growth of Suc++ mutants was similar to that of the control rpoS null mutant under all conditions tested.

Figure 2
figure 2

Growth of EDL933 and derivative Suc++ mutants on M9 glucose (Glu) and succinate (Suc) media. Colony size (diameter) was determined under a light microscope at 40× magnification.

Full size image

All VTEC strains were then tested for selection on succinate under anaerobic conditions. As under aerobic conditions, Suc++ mutants could be selected from all tested strains, except for CL3, R82F2 and N99-4390. Most (87%) of the Suc++ had reduced catalase activity. We sequenced the rpoS region of 15 Suc++ mutants isolated from EDL933 and found mutations in rpoS, resulting in impaired RpoS function, in 13 mutants while the rpoS gene in the other two Suc++ mutants remained unchanged (data not shown).

Expression of virulence-related traits, RDAR and cell adherence

Mutations in rpoS may affect virulence factor expression in pathogenic strains [39, 40]. To test this, we examined two virulence-related traits, the RDAR morphotype and cell adherence. Extracellular components, such as curli fimbriae and cellulose, are correlated with biofilm formation and virulence in Salmonella sp. and E. coli strains [41–43]. The expression of curli and cellulose can be visualized by staining with Congo Red dye to produce a red, dry and rough morphotype (RDAR) [43, 44]. Biosynthesis of both curli and cellulose is positively regulated by RpoS through a transcriptional regulator CsgD in E. coli K12 [45, 46]. However, to our knowledge, the role of RpoS in expression of RDAR has not been previously tested in pathogenic E. coli isolates. Wild type EDL933 exhibited a more pronounced RDAR morphotype than an isogenic rpoS null deletion mutant and Suc++ mutants (Figure 3A), suggesting that RpoS is important for RDAR development. Similar results were also obtained for other VTEC strains (data not shown). Cell adherence assays were performed using human liver epithelial cell HepG2. The adherence of wild type EDL933 to HepG2 cells in tissue culture was two-fold higher than that of rpoS and Suc++ mutants (P < 0.05) (Figure 3B), indicating that Suc++ mutants are impaired in cell adherence due to loss of RpoS function. This is consistent with previous results that over-expression of RpoS stimulates cell adherence [47].

Figure 3
figure 3

Virulence-related traits, RDAR and cell adherence. (A) Development of RDAR morphotype is impaired in Suc++ mutants. Cells were replica-plated on CR (Congo Red) plates and incubated at 25°C for 48 h. (B) Cell adherence to epithelial cells. The adherence was expressed as the percentage of cells surviving the washing process. rpoS designates the constructed rpoS null-deletion mutant.

Full size image

Suc++ mutants with an intact RpoS function (rpoS+)

During the screening for the Suc++ phenotype, we found that a small proportion of Suc++ mutants from strains EDL933 (8%), CL106 (16%), and EC6-484 (33%) were catalase-positive, a presumptive indication that RpoS was functional. To confirm this, we sequenced the rpoS region of five such Suc++ mutants (three aerobically isolated and the other two anaerobically isolated) of strain EDL933. As expected, there was no mutation in the rpoS gene in these mutant strains. However, these grew much better than wild type when grown on succinate (generation time: 240 ± 31 min) and fumarate (generation time: 306 ± 33 min) (Table 3). These data suggest that non-rpoS mutations are a minor component in the poor carbon selection process.

Effect of the rpoS mutation on metabolism by Phenotype Microarray analysis

RpoS is known to negatively control many genes involved in metabolism [10, 12, 48], and therefore, mutations in rpoS are likely to exert pleiotropic effects on metabolism. To test this, we compared wild type MG1655 and its derivative rpoS deletion mutants [12] using Phenotype Microarray analysis (Biolog, Hayward, CA). The rpoS mutants exhibited better respiration on 8 carbon sources and 92 nitrogen sources but less respiration on four carbon sources and one nitrogen source (Table 4). The substantial impact of rpoS mutations on nutrient utilization suggest that the beneficial effect of loss of RpoS in one selection condition may be extended to other conditions as well.

Table 4 Phenotypic Microarray (PM) analyses of growth changes resulted from rpoS mutations.
Full size table

Enhanced growth of Suc++ (rpoS+ and rpoS-) mutants is not limited to the TCA cycle intermediates

To extend the phenotype screening results to pathogenic E. coli, we tested the growth of EDL933 and derivative rpoS and Suc++ (rpoS+ and rpoS-) mutants on selected carbon sources (20 mM each) that best supported differential respiration of rpoS mutants relative to wild type (Figure 4). Glucose and succinate were also tested as controls for comparison. As expected, compared with wild type, the rpoS and Suc++ mutants grew similarly on glucose but much better on succinate. Among the Biolog compounds tested, the rpoS and Suc++ mutants, including the Suc++(rpoS+) mutants, grew better than wild type on D-glucuronic acid or glutamine as the sole carbon source. However, none of these strains could grow on threonine or proline as the sole carbon source, which is likely due to differences in strain background and experimental conditions. The enhanced growth of mutants on D-glucuronic acid and glutamine confirmed that mutations selected on succinate have pleiotropic effects on utilization of other nutrient sources.

Figure 4
figure 4

Growth of EDL933 and derivative mutants on different carbon sources. "ND": not detected. Cells were grown in LB media to OD600 0.6, washed and inoculated to fresh media to a starting OD600of 0.05. Cultures were then grown at 37°C with vigorous shaking (200 rpm) and sampled every hour for 10 hours to monitor growth. D-glucuronic acid, threonine, glutamine or proline were added to M9 minimal media as the sole carbon source to a final concentration of 20 mM.

Full size image

Discussion

Understanding how pathogens adapt and mutate in response to growth environments is critical in deciphering many of the unknowns regarding pathogenesis, such as the emergence of new pathogens, the increased resistance to antibiotics, and the long-term persistence in host environment. In this study, we report that a metabolic selection mechanism for loss of RpoS, a central stress and adaptation regulator, in representative verocytotoxin-producing E. coli strains, may be responsible for the occurrence of rpoS mutations among pathogenic E. coli isolates. In surveying the rpoS gene among E. coli isolates, we found many mutations in rpoS, some of which result in loss of RpoS function. Among the VTEC strains tested, most grow poorly on succinate (like laboratory K12 strains) but some strains grow well. Those that grow poorly all have intact rpoS. In contrast, strains that grow well on succinate can be distinguished into two groups, one with intact rpoS and the other with truncated rpoS. The difference in utilization of succinate and rpoS status of these natural isolates is likely the result of certain selection that has occurred in natural environments. By testing growth-enhanced mutants (Suc++) selected from strains with intact rpoS on succinate, we identified two groups of mutants, one with impaired RpoS while the other with functional RpoS, a finding that is in agreement with the two parallel groups found in natural VTEC isolates. This correlation provides support that metabolic selection is a natural process relevant to pathogenic strains.

Most of the selected Suc++ mutants had lost RpoS function, confirmed by both DNA sequencing and Western analyses. The positive selection pressure for rpoS mutations may result from the known negative effect of RpoS on a large group of genes including those in the TCA cycle [10, 12, 48, 49]. In E. coli, the number of sigma factors greatly exceeds the number of RNA core polymerase, and thus there is a strong competition among sigma factors for binding to the core polymerase [50]. Genes involved in the TCA cycle are primarily transcribed by RpoD, the vegetative sigma factor [50]. The absence of RpoS, caused by rpoS mutation or low levels of expression, may thus result in an increase in RpoD-associated RNA polymerase, thereby leading to enhanced expression of the TCA cycle genes [12, 51, 52].

Mutations in rpoS result in substantial phenotypic modification. A previous study using similar Biolog screening technology has shown that the mutation of rpoS stimulates metabolism of about 20 carbon compounds in some E. coli strains but only has a minor effect in MG1655 [22]. By comparing respiration rates instead of final OD employed in the previous study, we extended previous results and found that the respiration of the rpoS deletion mutant [12] increased in over 100 new compounds compared with wild type MG1655. Thus, we suggest that RpoS, known as a master stress regulator, can be also envisioned as a central metabolism repressor, whose inactivation results in enhanced nutrient utilization abilities. RpoS, therefore, is a critical control in cellular fitness, which can be defined as better survival or growth depending on environmental conditions. During stress conditions, activation of RpoS promotes survival by protecting cells from multiple stresses. During growth on poor carbon sources, however, mutating RpoS results in better growth by conferring cells enhanced metabolic abilities. In either case, cell fitness is effectively achieved through modulation of a single factor, RpoS.

What are the potential effects for loss of RpoS in pathogenic E. coli? On one hand, mutations in rpoS in Suc++ mutants may attenuate RpoS-mediated stress resistance and virulence functions. Suc++ mutants were deficient in RDAR morphotype development, an indicator for expression of extracellular components that are important for bacterial pathogenesis [41]. We also found that adherence to epithelial cells was impaired in rpoS and Suc++ mutants, indicating a decrease in pathogenesis. On the other hand, because rpoS mutants can better utilize non-preferred carbon sources [23], rpoS mutations may help E. coli compete with other bacteria in the human intestine, a highly-competitive environment harboring at least 1,000 different species [53]. It has been reported that rpoS mutants outcompete wild type strains in colonizing mouse intestine [54]. Although mutations in rpoS may increase the sensitivity of E. coli cells to exogenous stresses (due to the loss of protective functions such as catalase), enhanced metabolism of less-preferred carbon sources may offset this deficiency and lead to, on the whole, selection for rpoS mutations even in a competitive environment [52]. This has led to the proposal by Ferenci and co-workers that the loss of RpoS may be viewed as an increase in metabolic fitness at the expense of a loss of protective functions [55]. A slightly different scenario may be operant in VTEC strains where loss of pathogenic functions, such as curli fimbriae, may occur during selection for enhanced metabolic fitness (this study), even in the host environment where rpoS mutants can be isolated [21]. It is also important to note that mutants of rpoS were isolated at a low frequency close to spontaneous mutation frequency (10-8), suggesting that naturally occurred rpoS mutants would constitute, at least initially, only a small fraction of E. coli population unless there is a prolonged strong selective condition (i.e., poor carbon source).

Although loss of RpoS appears to be the usual consequence of selection for metabolic fitness, clearly other mutation(s) can also occur and result in an enhanced growth phenotype (e.g., five of 30 EDL933-derived Suc++ mutants characterized did not acquire mutations in rpoS). The occurrence of non-rpoS mutations may be strain-specific, since such mutations could not be selected from K12 strains [23] or from some of the tested VTEC strains in this study. The non-rpoS mutations may represent another adaptation strategy of E. coli in natural environments, in which metabolic fitness is achieved without the cost of RpoS-controlled stress resistance system (Figure 5). Of the ten tested wild type VTEC strains, three grew well on succinate, among which two strains (CL3 and R82F2) are RpoS+ and one (N99-4390) is RpoS-. It is possible that both rpoS and non-rpoS mutations for enhanced growth could have occurred in nature among E. coli isolates. Given the importance of RpoS in cell survival, growth-enhanced mutations that retain RpoS functions may be better preserved among E. coli natural populations. Using representative natural commensal E. coli isolates from the ECOR collection [56], we recently found that seven of ten wild type ECOR strains can utilize succinate well; six of them were RpoS+ and one was RpoS- (Dong and Schellhorn, unpublished data).

Figure 5
figure 5

Dynamic view of RpoS status and metabolic fitness in natural E. coli populations. It is postulated that the ancestral E. coli strain possesses a functional rpoS allele (RpoS+) but cannot grow well on poor nutrient sources (Suc--). Upon exposure to nutrient limitation, mutants (Suc++) exhibiting enhanced metabolic activity can be selected and become dominant among the population. These mutants consist of two groups, RpoS+ and RpoS-. Under stress conditions, however, the proportion of RpoS- mutants decreases because of the loss of protection by RpoS-controlled functions, and the abundance of strains with functional RpoS increases. Because cells likely are constantly facing selection between nutrient limitation and stress in nature, the population of E. coli isolates is in a dynamic status in terms of RpoS function and metabolic fitness.

Full size image

Conclusion

In summary, non-preferred carbon sources can select for rpoS mutations in pathogenic VTEC E. coli strains. The resultant Suc++ mutants also exhibited growth advantages on succinate minimal media under anaerobic conditions with nitrate as a respiratory electron receptor. Suc++ mutants harboring rpoS mutations were impaired in the development of RDAR morphotype and the ability of adherence to epithelial cells. Heterogeneity of rpoS as a result of the selection may thus contribute to differences in pathogenesis among pathogenic E. coli strains.

Methods

Bacterial strains, media, and growth conditions

Pathogenic strains examined in this study are listed in Table 1. Strains were routinely grown in Luria-Bertani (LB) broth aerobically at 37°C with shaking at 200 rpm. Cell growth was monitored spectrophotometrically at 600 nm. M9 minimal media was supplemented with glucose (0.4% wt/vol), succinate (1%), fumarate (1%) or malate (1%) as a sole carbon source [57]. Media was supplemented with ampicillin (100 μg/ml) and chloramphenicol (25 μg/ml) as indicated. All chemicals and media were supplied by Invitrogen, Fisher Scientific, or Sigma-Aldrich. The generation time was determined using exponential phase cultures (g = t/(3.3 (log N-log N0)); g = generation time; t = time of exponential growth; N0 = initial cell number; N = final cell number) [58].

HepG2 cell growth

HepG2 cells were grown at 37°C in 5% CO2 in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% (v/v) heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS).

Selection of Suc++ mutants

Cultures were inoculated into LB broth from single colonies. After overnight incubation, cells were washed 3 times with M9 minimal salts to eliminate media carryover, plated on succinate minimal media (approximately 109 cells) and incubated at 37°C for 48 h. Several large colonies (Suc++) from each plate were picked and purified by serial streaking on succinate plates. The selection for Suc++ mutants was performed in triplicate using independent colonies to ensure isolated mutants were not clones descended from single variants. Three independent mutants, selected from independently-grown cultures of each strain, were sequenced using rpoS flanking primers as described below.

Amplification of the rpoS region and sequencing

The rpoS region of wild type strains and putative rpoS mutants that were catalase-deficient was amplified using primers FP1 (CAACAAGAAGTGAAGGCGGG) and RP1 (TGGCCTTTCTGACAGAT GCTTAC) by whole colony PCR. A single colony from each strain was resuspended into 30 μl ddH2O, heated at 95°C for 5 min, and 4 μl was used in a standard 20 μl PCR reaction. PCR products were purified by QIAquick Purification Kit (Qiagen, Inc.) and sequenced by MOBIX lab (McMaster University).

Construction of EDL933 rpoS deletion mutant

A precise rpoS deletion mutant of EDL933 was constructed using the Red recombination system [59], and served as a negative control for the following experiments. The rpoS gene was replaced by homologous recombination with the chloramphenicol resistant gene cat, which was amplified using pKD3 plasmid (the template) and primers FP2 (CCTCGCTTGAGACTG GCCTTTCTGACAGATGCTTACGTGTAGGCTGGAGCTGCTTC) and RP2 (ATGTTC CGTCAAGGGATCACGGGTAGGAGCCACCTTCATATGAATATCCTCCTTAG). The cat gene was further removed from the chromosome by recombination with the FLP recombinase. The resultant mutant lost the entire rpoS ORF. The mutation was confirmed by PCR using primers flanking the deleted region.

Catalase assay

Native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) was performed to examine the catalase activity in selected Suc++ mutants. Overnight cultures were harvested by centrifugation at 4,000 × g for 15 min at 4°C, and washed three times in potassium phosphate buffer (50 mM, pH 7.0). Cells were resuspended to OD600 nm= 15 in potassium phosphate buffer (50 mM, pH 7.0) and disrupted by sonication using a Heat Systems sonicator (Misonix, Inc., Farmingdale, New York). Cell debris was removed by centrifugation for 15 min at 12,000 × g at 4°C. Protein concentration was determined by the Bradford assay using bovine serum albumin as a standard [60]. Ten μg of each protein sample were loaded on a 10% native polyacrylamide gel and resolved at 160 V for 50 min. The gel was then stained with horseradish peroxidase and diaminobenzidine as described by Clare et al. [61]. Parallel gels were stained with Coomassie Blue R-250 to verify equal protein loading. Plate catalase assays were used to qualitatively test the Suc++ mutants for loss of catalase activity by dropping 10 μl of 30% H2O2 on the plates, an indicator for rpoS status because catalase production is highly-RpoS dependent [30].

Western blot analysis

Protein samples were prepared as described for catalase staining. Samples (10 μg) were boiled for 5 min, loaded on a 10% SDS-PAGE gel, and fractioned at 160 V for 50 min. Protein samples were then transferred from the gel onto a PVDF membrane by electrophoresis at 90 V for 1 h. The PVDF membrane was incubated with anti-RpoS (a gift from R. Hengge, Freie Universität Berlin) or anti-AppA sera (a gift from C.W. Forsberg, University of Guelph) and secondary antibody of goat anti-rabbit immunoglobulin (Bio-Rad). Signals were detected using enhanced chemiluminescence (Amersham Bioscience).

Growth under aerobic and anaerobic conditions

Culture samples were collected after overnight incubation in LB media, and washed 3 times in M9 salts. To obtain isolated mutant colonies, serial dilutions were plated on M9 minimal media with either glucose (0.4%) or succinate (1%) as the sole carbon source, and incubated for 72 h at 37°C under aerobic or anaerobic conditions as indicated. Anaerobic conditions were maintained in Brewer anaerobic jars (Becton Dickinson) using the BBL GasPak anaerobic system as described previously [62]. Potassium nitrate (40 mM) was supplemented to all the media to provide an electron receptor for respiration under anaerobic conditions [62]. The diameter of individual colonies was determined at 40× magnification.

Test of pathogenicity-related traits

(a) RDAR morphotype

To visualize RDAR (red, dry and rough) cell morphotype [44], a single colony of each strain was resuspended in non-salt LB media (1% tryptone and 0.5% yeast extract) in a 96-well microtiter plate, transferred to Congo Red (CR) plates (non-salt LB media with 1.5% agar, 40 μg/ml of Congo Red dye, and 20 μg/ml of Coomassie Blue R-250) by replica plating, and grown at 25°C for 48 h [44].

(b) Adherence assay

Quantitative adherence assays were performed as described by Torres and Kaper [63]. Wild type E. coli EDL933 and derivative rpoS and Suc++ mutants were tested for adherence to human liver epithelial HepG2 cells. Confluent HepG2 cultures grown in DMEM were incubated with 108 CFU E. coli overnight grown cells for 6 h at 37°C in 5% CO2. Adhered E. coli cells were washed with PBS buffer, released by 0.1% Triton X-100 and enumerated by serial plating on LB media. The adherence is reported as the percentage of cells that remain adherent following the washing process. The statistical significance of differences between treatment groups was determined using an unpaired Student's t-test [64].

Phenotype Microarray analysis

To assess the effect of RpoS on metabolism, we compared wild type MG1655 E. coli strain and a derivative null-rpoS mutant [12] using a commercial high-throughput phenotype screening service, Phenotype Microarray (PM) analysis (Biolog, Hayward, CA), that permits evaluation of about 2,000 cellular phenotypes including utilization of carbon, nitrogen, phosphate and sensitivity to various stresses [65, 66]. PM analysis assesses substrate-dependent changes in cell respiration using tetrazolium as an electron acceptor and has been widely used to test growth phenotypes [67–69].

Sequence alignment

The rpoS sequences of VTEC E. coli strains and isolated mutants were aligned by ClustalW [70] and graphically depicted using Vector NTI 10 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA).

References

  1. Stoodley P, Sauer K, Davies DG, Costerton JW: Biofilms as complex differentiated communities. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2002, 56: 187-209.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Davidson CJ, Surette MG: Individuality in bacteria. Annu Rev Genet. 2008, 42: 253-268.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wolf DM, Vazirani VV, Arkin AP: Diversity in times of adversity: probabilistic strategies in microbial survival games. J Theor Biol. 2005, 234: 227-253.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lederberg J, Iino T: Phase Variation in Salmonella. Genetics. 1956, 41: 743-757.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hallet B: Playing Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde: combined mechanisms of phase variation in bacteria. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2001, 4: 570-581.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tolker-Nielsen T, Holmstrom K, Boe L, Molin S: Non-genetic population heterogeneity studied by in situ polymerase chain reaction. Mol Microbiol. 1998, 27: 1099-1105.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ozbudak EM, Thattai M, Kurtser I, Grossman AD, van Oudenaarden A: Regulation of noise in the expression of a single gene. Nat Genet. 2002, 31: 69-73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dong T, Joyce C, Schellhorn HE: The Role of RpoS in Bacterial Adaptation. Bacterial Physiology – A Molecular Approach. Edited by: Walid M El-Sharoud. 2008, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 313-337.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Hengge-Aronis R: The general stress response in Escherichia coli. Bacterial stress response. Edited by: Storz G, Hengge-Aronis R. 2000, Washington, D.C.: ASM press, 161-178.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dong T, Kirchhof MG, Schellhorn HE: RpoS regulation of gene expression during exponential growth of Escherichia coli K12. Mol Genet Genomics. 2008, 279: 267-277.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lacour S, Landini P: SigmaS-dependent gene expression at the onset of stationary phase in Escherichia coli: function of sigmaS-dependent genes and identification of their promoter sequences. J Bacteriol. 2004, 186: 7186-7195.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Patten CL, Kirchhof MG, Schertzberg MR, Morton RA, Schellhorn HE: Microarray analysis of RpoS-mediated gene expression in Escherichia coli K-12. Mol Genet Genomics. 2004, 272: 580-591.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Weber H, Polen T, Heuveling J, Wendisch VF, Hengge R: Genome-wide analysis of the general stress response network in Escherichia coli: sigmaS-dependent genes, promoters, and sigma factor selectivity. J Bacteriol. 2005, 187: 1591-1603.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Dong T, Schellhorn HE: Control of RpoS in global gene expression of Escherichia coli in minimal media. Mol Genet Genomics. 2009, 281: 19-33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lange R, Hengge-Aronis R: Identification of a central regulator of stationary-phase gene expression in Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol. 1991, 5: 49-59.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Small P, Blankenhorn D, Welty D, Zinser E, Slonczewski JL: Acid and base resistance in Escherichia coli and Shigella flexneri: role of rpoS and growth pH. J Bacteriol. 1994, 176: 1729-1737.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hengge-Aronis R, Klein W, Lange R, Rimmele M, Boos W: Trehalose synthesis genes are controlled by the putative sigma factor encoded by rpoS and are involved in stationary-phase thermotolerance in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1991, 173: 7918-7924.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sammartano LJ, Tuveson RW, Davenport R: Control of sensitivity to inactivation by H2O2 and broad-spectrum near-UV radiation by the Escherichia coli katF (rpoS) locus. J Bacteriol. 1986, 168: 13-21.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Atlung T, Nielsen HV, Hansen FG: Characterisation of the allelic variation in the rpoS gene in thirteen K12 and six other non-pathogenic Escherichia coli strains. Mol Genet Genomics. 2002, 266: 873-881.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Subbarayan PR, Sarkar M: A comparative study of variation in codon 33 of the rpoS gene in Escherichia coli K12 stocks: implications for the synthesis of sigma(S). Mol Genet Genomics. 2004, 270: 533-538.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Waterman SR, Small PL: Characterization of the acid resistance phenotype and rpoS alleles of shiga-like toxin-producing Escherichia coli. Infect Immun. 1996, 64: 2808-2811.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. King T, Ishihama A, Kori A, Ferenci T: A regulatory trade-off as a source of strain variation in the species Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 2004, 186: 5614-5620.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Chen G, Patten CL, Schellhorn HE: Positive selection for loss of RpoS function in Escherichia coli. Mutat Res. 2004, 554: 193-203.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Spira B, Hu X, Ferenci T: Strain variation in ppGpp concentration and RpoS levels in laboratory strains of Escherichia coli K-12. Microbiology. 2008, 154: 2887-2895.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Cummings JH, Pomare EW, Branch WJ, Naylor CP, Macfarlane GT: Short chain fatty acids in human large intestine, portal, hepatic and venous blood. Gut. 1987, 28: 1221-1227.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Rosenthal AZ, Hu M, Gralla JD: Osmolyte-induced transcription: -35 region elements and recognition by sigma38 (rpoS). Mol Microbiol. 2006, 59: 1052-1061.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Rasko DA, Rosovitz MJ, Myers GS, Mongodin EF, Fricke WF, Gajer P, Crabtree J, Sebaihia M, Thomson NR, Chaudhuri R, et al.: The pangenome structure of Escherichia coli: comparative genomic analysis of E. coli commensal and pathogenic isolates. J Bacteriol. 2008, 190: 6881-6893.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Karmali MA: Infection by verocytotoxin-producing Escherichia coli. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1989, 2: 15-38.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Karmali MA, Mascarenhas M, Shen S, Ziebell K, Johnson S, Reid-Smith R, Isaac-Renton J, Clark C, Rahn K, Kaper JB: Association of genomic O island 122 of Escherichia coli EDL 933 with verocytotoxin-producing Escherichia coli seropathotypes that are linked to epidemic and/or serious disease. J Clin Microbiol. 2003, 41: 4930-4940.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Schellhorn HE, Hassan HM: Transcriptional regulation of katE in Escherichia coli K-12. J Bacteriol. 1988, 170: 4286-4292.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Mulvey MR, Sorby PA, Triggs-Raine BL, Loewen PC: Cloning and physical characterization of katE and katF required for catalase HPII expression in Escherichia coli. Gene. 1988, 73: 337-345.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Christman MF, Morgan RW, Jacobson FS, Ames BN: Positive control of a regulon for defenses against oxidative stress and some heat-shock proteins in Salmonella typhimurium. Cell. 1985, 41: 753-762.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kitagawa M, Ara T, Arifuzzaman M, Ioka-Nakamichi T, Inamoto E, Toyonaga H, Mori H: Complete set of ORF clones of Escherichia coli ASKA library (A Complete Set of E. coli K-12 ORF Archive): Unique Resources for Biological Research. DNA Res. 2005, 12: 291-299.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Atlung T, Knudsen K, Heerfordt L, Brondsted L: Effects of sigmaS and the transcriptional activator AppY on induction of the Escherichia coli hya and cbdAB-appA operons in response to carbon and phosphate starvation. J Bacteriol. 1997, 179: 2141-2146.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Golovan S, Wang G, Zhang J, Forsberg CW: Characterization and overproduction of the Escherichia coli appA encoded bifunctional enzyme that exhibits both phytase and acid phosphatase activities. Can J Microbiol. 2000, 46: 59-71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Saul RL, Kabir SH, Cohen Z, Bruce WR, Archer MC: Reevaluation of nitrate and nitrite levels in the human intestine. Cancer Res. 1981, 41: 2280-2283.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Witter JP, Gatley SJ, Balish E: Evaluation of nitrate synthesis by intestinal microorganisms in vivo. Science. 1981, 213: 449-450.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Forte P, Dykhuizen RS, Milne E, McKenzie A, Smith CC, Benjamin N: Nitric oxide synthesis in patients with infective gastroenteritis. Gut. 1999, 45: 355-361.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Fang FC, Libby SJ, Buchmeier NA, Loewen PC, Switala J, Harwood J, Guiney DG: The alternative sigma factor katF (rpoS) regulates Salmonella virulence. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1992, 89: 11978-11982.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Norel F, Robbe-Saule V, Popoff MY, Coynault C: The putative sigma factor KatF (RpoS) is required for the transcription of the Salmonella typhimurium virulence gene spvB in Escherichia coli. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1992, 78: 271-276.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Uhlich GA, Keen JE, Elder RO: Variations in the csgD promoter of Escherichia coli O157:H7 associated with increased virulence in mice and increased invasion of HEp-2 cells. Infect Immun. 2002, 70: 395-399.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Bian Z, Brauner A, Li Y, Normark S: Expression of and cytokine activation by Escherichia coli curli fibers in human sepsis. J Infect Dis. 2000, 181: 602-612.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Romling U: Characterization of the rdar morphotype, a multicellular behaviour in Enterobacteriaceae. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2005, 62: 1234-1246.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Bokranz W, Wang X, Tschape H, Romling U: Expression of cellulose and curli fimbriae by Escherichia coli isolated from the gastrointestinal tract. J Med Microbiol. 2005, 54: 1171-1182.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Weber H, Pesavento C, Possling A, Tischendorf G, Hengge R: Cyclic-di-GMP-mediated signalling within the sigma network of Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol. 2006, 62: 1014-1034.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Romling U, Bian Z, Hammar M, Sierralta WD, Normark S: Curli fibers are highly conserved between Salmonella typhimurium and Escherichia coli with respect to operon structure and regulation. J Bacteriol. 1998, 180: 722-731.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Bhagwat AA, Chan L, Han R, Tan J, Kothary M, Jean-Gilles J, Tall BD: Characterization of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli strains based on acid resistance phenotypes. Infect Immun. 2005, 73: 4993-5003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Rahman M, Hasan MR, Oba T, Shimizu K: Effect of rpoS gene knockout on the metabolism of Escherichia coli during exponential growth phase and early stationary phase based on gene expressions, enzyme activities and intracellular metabolite concentrations. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2006, 94: 585-595.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Jung IL, Kim SK, Kim IG: The RpoS-mediated regulation of isocitrate dehydrogenase gene expression in Escherichia coli. Curr Microbiol. 2006, 52: 21-26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Ishihama A: Functional modulation of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2000, 54: 499-518.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Farewell A, Kvint K, Nystrom T: Negative regulation by RpoS: a case of sigma factor competition. Mol Microbiol. 1998, 29: 1039-1051.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Ferenci T: What is driving the acquisition of mutS and rpoS polymorphisms in Escherichia coli?. Trends Microbiol. 2003, 11: 457-461.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Sears CL: A dynamic partnership: Celebrating our gut flora. Anaerobe. 2005, 11: 247-251.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Krogfelt KA, Hjulgaard M, Sorensen K, Cohen PS, Givskov M: rpoS gene function is a disadvantage for Escherichia coli BJ4 during competitive colonization of the mouse large intestine. Infect Immun. 2000, 68: 2518-2524.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. King T, Seeto S, Ferenci T: Genotype-by-environment interactions influencing the emergence of rpoS mutations in Escherichia coli populations. Genetics. 2006, 172: 2071-2079.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Ochman H, Selander RK: Standard reference strains of Escherichia coli from natural populations. J Bacteriol. 1984, 157: 690-693.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Miller JH: A short course in bacterial genetics: A laboratory manual and handbookfor Escherichia coli and related bacteria. 1992, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.: Cold Spring Harbor Press

    Google Scholar 

  58. Madigan MT, Martinko JM, Parker J: Brock Biology of Microorganisms. 2003, Prentice Hall International; New Jersey, 10

    Google Scholar 

  59. Datsenko KA, Wanner BL: One-step inactivation of chromosomal genes in Escherichia coli K-12 using PCR products. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000, 97: 6640-6645.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Bradford MM: A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976, 72: 248-254.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Clare DA, Duong MN, Darr D, Archibald F, Fridovich I: Effects of molecular oxygen on detection of superoxide radical with nitroblue tetrazolium and on activity stains for catalase. Anal Biochem. 1984, 140: 532-537.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Chang L, Wei LI, Audia JP, Morton RA, Schellhorn HE: Expression of the Escherichia coli NRZ nitrate reductase is highly growth phase dependent and is controlled by RpoS, the alternative vegetative sigma factor. Mol Microbiol. 1999, 34: 756-766.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Torres AG, Kaper JB: Multiple elements controlling adherence of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7 to HeLa cells. Infect Immun. 2003, 71: 4985-4995.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Bliss CI: Statistics in Biology. 1970, New York, USA: McGraw Hill Book Company

    Google Scholar 

  65. Bochner BR: New technologies to assess genotype-phenotype relationships. Nat Rev Genet. 2003, 4: 309-314.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Bochner BR, Gadzinski P, Panomitros E: Phenotype microarrays for high-throughput phenotypic testing and assay of gene function. Genome Res. 2001, 11: 1246-1255.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Loh KD, Gyaneshwar P, Markenscoff PE, Fong R, Kim KS, Parales R, Zhou Z, Inwood W, Kustu S: A previously undescribed pathway for pyrimidine catabolism. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006, 103: 5114-5119.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Zhou L, Lei XH, Bochner BR, Wanner BL: Phenotype microarray analysis of Escherichia coli K-12 mutants with deletions of all two-component systems. J Bacteriol. 2003, 185: 4956-4972.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Ihssen J, Egli T: Global physiological analysis of carbon- and energy-limited growing Escherichia coli confirms a high degree of catabolic flexibility and preparedness for mixed substrate utilization. Environ Microbiol. 2005, 7: 1568-1581.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG: The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997, 25: 4876-4882.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Dong T, Coombes BK, Schellhorn HE: Role of RpoS in the virulence of Citrobacter rodentium. Infect Immun. 2009, 77: 501-507.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by grants from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) and Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) to H.E.S. We are grateful to M.A. Karmali for providing the VTEC strains, R. Hengge for the RpoS antisera and C.W. Forsberg for the AppA antisera. We thank R.A. Morton for critical review of the manuscript and E. Diakun for technical assistance. C.J. and R.Y. were supported by NSERC scholarships.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biology, Life Sciences Building, Rm. 433, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada

    Tao Dong, Sarah M Chiang, Charlie Joyce, Rosemary Yu & Herb E Schellhorn

Authors
  1. Tao Dong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sarah M Chiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Charlie Joyce
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Rosemary Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Herb E Schellhorn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Herb E Schellhorn.

Additional information

Authors' contributions

TD performed most of the experiments and wrote the first draft. RY aided in sequencing the rpoS region of selected mutants. SMC, CJ, and HES helped in the design of several experiments and revision of the manuscript. HES is the principal investigator and supervised the project. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Electronic supplementary material

12866_2009_789_MOESM1_ESM.pdf

Additional file 1: Alignment of rpoS gene sequences of Suc++ mutants with parental strains. The alignment data show the location of mutations within the rpoS gene in the selected Suc++ mutants in comparison with parental strains. (PDF 349 KB)

12866_2009_789_MOESM2_ESM.pdf

Additional file 2: Alignment of predicted RpoS protein sequences of Suc++ mutants with parental strains. The protein alignment data show the predicted mutant forms of RpoS resulting from the identified mutations in the rpoS gene of Suc++ mutants. (PDF 128 KB)

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dong, T., Chiang, S.M., Joyce, C. et al. Polymorphism and selection of rpoS in pathogenic Escherichia coli. BMC Microbiol 9, 118 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-9-118

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-9-118

Keywords

BMC Microbiology

ISSN: 1471-2180

Contact us