You are here

Article Text

Article menu

Download PDFPDF

XML
Research Article
TNF-α enhances Th9 cell differentiation and antitumor immunity via TNFR2-dependent pathways
  1. Yuxue Jiang1,
  2. Jintong Chen1,
  3. Enguang Bi2,
  4. Yinghua Zhao1,
  5. Tianxue Qin3,
  6. Yiming Wang4,
  7. Alison Wang1,
  8. Sujun Gao3,
  9. Qing Yi1,2,5 and
  10. Siqing Wang1,j
  1. Aff1 grid.430605.4Department of Cancer ImmunologyThe First Hospital of Jilin University 519 Dongminzhu St, ChangChun Jilin China
  2. Aff2 0000 0001 0675 4725grid.239578.2Department of Cancer Biology, Cleveland ClinicLerner Research Institute 44195 Cleveland OH USA
  3. Aff3 grid.430605.4Department of HematologyThe First Hospital of Jilin University 130061 Changchun China
  4. Aff4 0000 0004 1771 3349grid.415954.8Department of OrthopedicsChina-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University Changchun China
  5. Aff5 0000 0004 0445 0041grid.63368.38Center for Hematologic MalignancyResearch Institute Houston Methodist Hospital 77030 Houston TX USA
  1. ↵j 86-15943073518 siw1970{at}yahoo.com

Abstract

Tumor specific Th9 cells are potential effector cells for adoptive therapy of human cancers. TNF family members OX40L, TL1A and GITRL have been shown to promote the induction of Th9 cells and antitumor immunity. However, the role of TNF-α, the prototype of the TNF superfamily cytokines, in Th9 cell differentiation and their antitumor efficacy is not defined. Here, we showed that TNF-α potently promoted naïve CD4+ T cells to differentiate into Th9 cells in vitro. Furthermore, the addition of TNF-α during Th9 cell differentiation increased T cell survival and proliferation. More importantly, the adoptive transfer of TNF-α-treated Th9 cells induced more potent antitumor effects than regular Th9 cells in mouse tumor model. TNF-α signals via two cell surface receptors, TNFR1 and TNFR2. Mechanistic studies revealed that TNF-α drove Th9 cell differentiation through TNFR2 but not TNFR1. In addition, under Th9 polarizing condition, TNF-α activated STAT5 and NF-κB pathways in T cells in a TNFR2-dependent manner. Inhibition of STAT5 and NF-κB pathways by their specific inhibitors impaired TNF-α-induced Th9 cell differentiation. Our results identified TNF-α as a new powerful inducer of Th9 cells and clarified the molecular mechanisms underlying TNF-α-induced Th9 cell differentiation.

  • TNF-α
  • Th9
  • TNFR2
  • STAT5

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40425-018-0494-8

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    Introduction

    Adoptive T-cell therapy (ACT) has shown encouraging results in some cancer types; however, most tumors are refractory to ACT [1]. The efficacy of ACT of cancers relies on the cytolytic activity and the in vivo persistence of the transferred effector T cells [1–4]. Tumor-specific CD8+ T cells have powerful cytolytic activities against tumor cells [1]. However, CD8+ T cells used in ACT of cancers are often terminally differentiated and have a disappointing lack of persistence in vivo [2]. CD4+ T helper (Th) cells are another option of effectors in ACT of cancers. Among Th cell subsets, the cytotoxic Th1 cells are a useful T cell lineage for ACT of cancers [3]. However, Th1 cells display an exhausted phenotype, and have a short-term persistence in vivo [3]. Compared to Th1 cells, the “stem cell-like” memory Th17 cells have reduced cytolytic function in vitro, but persist significantly longer in vivo, resulting in better antitumor efficacy in ACT of cancers [4, 5]. Th9 cells are a unique Th cell subset with a mature T cell phenotype, highly cytolytic activity and prolonged persistence in vivo based on their hyperproliferation, suggesting an excellent effector for ACT of human cancers [6].

    Th9 is a new Th cell subset characterized by the secretion of interleukin 9 (IL-9) [7, 8]. Th9 cells can be generated from naïve T cells by the cytokines IL-4 and TGF-β [7, 8]. However, some other cytokines, such as IL-25, TSLP and IL-1β, have been shown to potently stimulate Th9 cell differentiation [9–11]. In addition, multiple transcription factors, such as PU.1, IRF4, and STAT family members STAT1/5/6, have been reported to regulate Th9 cell differentiation [11–15]. In cancer immunology, tumor-specific Th9 cells possess potent antitumor activity and eradicate large tumors in mouse models, better than other Th cell subsets [6, 16, 17]. Various mechanisms may be involved in the antitumor effects of tumor specific Th9 cells. IL-9 enhances effector T cell proliferation [18, 19] and antitumor CTL responses [6, 16]. Th9 cells secrete cytolytic factors, GzmB and GzmA, which mediate direct tumor cytotoxcity [6, 17]. Interestingly, multiple TNF family members, including OX40L, TL1A and GITRL, have been shown to enhance Th9 cell differentiation and their antitumor efficacy [20–23]. However, the role of TNF-α, the prototype member of the TNF superfamily, in Th9 cell development and their antitumor capability is not defined.

    TNF-α is a potent proinflammatory cytokine, which is implicated in the immunopathology of various inflammatory diseases [24]. TNF-α stimulates inflammatory cytokine production, cell growth, cell survival and paradoxically, cell death [25–27]. In cancer immunology, TNF-α activates antigen-presenting cells and promotes the activation and proliferation of effector T cells [28, 29]. TNF-α impairs the function of regulatory T (Treg) cells [30], which contributes to antitumor immunity. TNF-α has two cell surface receptors TNFR1 and TNFR2 [24]. TNFR1 is widely expressed, whereas the expression of TNFR2 is limited to immune and endothelial cells [24, 31]. The cytoplasmic regions of TNFR1 contain a conserved ‘death’ domain which is essential for triggering cell apoptosis and subsequent activation of NF-κB [27, 31]. In contrast, TNFR2 lacks the cytoplasmic ‘death’ domain and has mainly been linked to cell survival and proinflammatory reactions [31, 32].

    In this study we found that TNF-α profoundly stimulates Th9 cell differentiation. And the adoptive transfer of TNF-α-treated Th9 cells induces more potent inhibition on melanoma tumor growth than regular Th9 cells in mouse models. In addition, we clarified the TNFR2-dependent signaling pathways of TNF-α-induced Th9 cell differentiation.

    Materials and methods

    Mice and cell lines

    C57BL/6 (H-2b), TNFR1−/− (B6.129-Tnfrsf1atm1Mak/J) and TNFR2−/− (B6.129S2-Tn frsf1btm1Mwm/J) mice were purchased from the Jackson Laboratory. Mice were housed in specific pathogen-free conditions at the First Hospital Animal Center of Jilin University. Mice at 6–8 weeks of age were used in experiments. All animal experiments were approved by the Animal Ethical Committee of First Hospital of Jilin University.

    B16 and B16-OVA melanoma cells were purchased from ATCC (Rockville, MD). Cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS, Hyclone), 100 U/mL penicillin and 100 mg/mL streptomycin (both from Invitrogen).

    Reagents

    Recombinant mouse IL-4, TNF-α and human TGF-β were purchased from R&D Systems. CFSE (carboxylfluorescein diacetate, succinimidyl ester) was purchased from Invitrogen. Functional anti-mouse CD3e and CD28 antibodies (mAbs) were purchased from eBioscience. Anti-TNFR1 and anti-TNFR2 blocking mAbs and control IgG were purchased from Biolegend. STAT5 inhibitor and Bortezomib (a NF-κB inhibitor) were purchased from Santa Cruz and Selleckchem respectively.

    In vitro Th9 cell differentiation

    Naive CD4+ T cells (CD4+CD25−CD62Lhi) were purified from spleen cells by fluorescence activated cell sorter (FACS). Naïve CD4+ T cells (1 × 105 per well) were cultured in the presence of plate-bound anti-CD3 (2 μg/mL) plus soluble anti-CD28 (2 μg/mL) and Th9-polarizing cytokines TGF-β (3 ng/mL) and IL-4 (10 ng/mL). Cells from cultures without addition of TGF-β and IL-4 were used as Th0 cells. In some cell cultures, TNF-α (50 ng/mL) was added. After 3 days of culture, the cells and culture supernatants were harvested and analyzed by flow cytometry, ELISA and/or qPCR.

    To examine the role of TNFR1 and TNFR2 in TNF-α-induced Th9 cell differentiation, naïve CD4+ T cells were cultured under the Th9-polarizing conditions with or without addition of TNF-α (50 ng/mL). Cell cultures were added with anti-TNFR1 (50 μg/mL), anti-TNFR2 (50 μg/mL) mAbs or control IgG (50 μg/mL). After 3 days of culture, the cells and culture supernatants were harvested and analyzed.

    To explore the signaling pathways involved in TNF-α-induced Th9 cell differentiation, naïve CD4+ T cells were cultured under the Th9-polarizing conditions in the presence or absence of TNF-α. In some cell cultures, STAT5 Inhibitor (10 μg/mL) or Bortezomib (1 nM) was added. After 3 days of culture, the cells and culture supernatants were harvested and analyzed.

    Flow cytometry

    Flow cytometry analysis was performed as described previously [23]. PE-Cy7-, FITC-, or Alex Fluor 700-conjugated mAbs against CD4 (cat #: 552775), CD25 (cat #: 553072), CD62L (cat #: 560517) and CD44 (cat #:561859) were purchased from BD Biosciences. PE- or APC-conjugated mAbs against IL-9 (cat #: 514103), TNFR1 (cat #: 113005) and TNFR2 (cat #: 113405) were purchased from Biolegend. Intracellular staining was performed by using a Cytofix/Cytoperm kit (BD Biosciences) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. Cells were acquired and analyzed by a BD LSRFortessa™ cytometer.

    Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR)

    Cellular RNA was extracted with the EasyPure RNA Kit (TransGen Biotech) and cDNA was amplified with an All-in-One First-Strand cDNA Synthesis SuperMix (TransGen Biotech). The expression of Il9, Ifng, Il4, Il5, Il13, Il17, Spi1, Irf4, Tbx21, Gata3, Rorc and Foxp3 by Th cells were analyzed with SYBR Green real-time PCR (Applied Biosystems). Gene expression was normalized to Gapdh. Primer sets were shown in the previous publication [23].

    Western-blot analyses

    Western-blot assay was performed as previously described [23]. Anti-mouse phosphorylated (p)-STAT1, p-STAT3, p-STAT5, p-STAT6, p-IKKα/β, IκB-α and β-actin antibodies were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (CST). p-STAT2 was purchased from Abcam. And p-STAT4 was purchased from Invitrogen.

    Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)

    Concentrations of IL-9 in culture supernatant were detected by ELISA as previously described [23]. IL-9 Capture/detection antibodies were purchased from BD Biosciences. Recombinant mouse IL-9 used as the standards in ELISA were purchased from R&D Systems. Avidin-HRP was purchased from Biolegend.

    RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq)

    Mouse naïve CD4+ T cells were cultured under Th9 polarizing conditions with or without addition of TNF-α for 6 h and cells were collected for RNA extraction. Total RNA was extracted with the Trizol (ThermoFisher) and RNA-Seq was done by the genomics core of Lerner Research Institute in Cleveland Clinic with Illumina HiSeq2500.

    Co-immunoprecipitation (co-IP) and mass spectrometry (MS)

    Naïve CD4+ T cells were cultured under Th9 polarizing conditions with or without addition of TNF-α for 3 h. Cells were collected and cell lysates were prepared in non-denaturing lysis buffer. Cell lysates were incubated with anti-TNFR2 antibody for 2 h at 4 °C, and subjected to immunoprecipitation (IP) using protein A-sepharose beads. The beads were washed with IP buffer. The proteins were eluted with SDS sample buffer and heated at 98 °C for 5 min. IP samples were then separated using SDS-PAGE and visualized by Coomassie Blue staining. The immunoreactive bands were excised from stained gels and digested overnight with trypsin (10 ng/μL) at room temperature. Peptides in the digested sample were analyzed using liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LC-MS) provided by Mass Spectrometry Laboratory for Protein Sequencing (Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA).

    Luciferase reporter assays

    The luciferase reporter vector pGL4.10, a control vector pGL4.74 and expression vectors for NF-κB molecules p50, p65, c-Rel, p52 and RelB were purchased from Addgene. A 2500-bp mouse Il9 promoter was inserted into pGL4.10 (mIl9-pGL4.10). HEK293T cells were transiently transfected with mIl9-pGL4.10 (0.25 μg per well), or pGL4.74 (0.05 μg per well) and expression vectors (0.5 μg per well) for NF-κB molecules by Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen). Promoter activity was measured with Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay System (Promega) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Values are normalized to internal control and expressed as the Mean ± SD of relative luciferase units.

    Adoptive tumor immunotherapy

    2 × 105 B16-OVA cells were injected subcutaneously into C57BL/6 mice. To generate Th9 cells, naïve CD4+ T cells from OT-II mice were cultured under Th9 polarizing conditions in the presence or absence of TNF-α for 2 days. On Day 2 after tumor injection, the mice were randomly divided into groups and transfused with Th9 or TNF-α-treated Th9 cells (1 × 106) via tail vein injection. Mice treated with PBS served as controls. Tumor development was monitored over time. The mice were killed when the tumor diameter reached between the range of 1.5 and 2 cm. Tumor volume was calculated by the formula: 3.14 × (mean diameter)3/6.

    Statistical analysis

    The Student t test (2 groups) and one-way ANOVA (> = 3 groups) were used to compare various experimental groups. A P value of less than 0.05 was considered significant.

    Results

    TNF-α promotes Th9 cell differentiation in vitro

    To examine the role of TNF-α in Th9 cell differentiation, naïve CD4+ T cells were cultured in the presence of anti-CD3/28 antibodies plus TGF-β, IL-4 and/or TNF-α for 3 days. The addition of TNF-α combined with Th9 polarizing cytokines TGF-β and IL-4 increased Th cell expression of IL-9 mRNA and protein (Fig. 1a, b), and the frequency of Th9 cells (Fig. 1c). However, TNF-α alone or TNF-α plus TGF-β or IL-4 could not induce Th9 cell differentiation (Fig. 1a-c). Interestingly, TNF-α did not increase the expression of Spi1 or Irf4 in Th9 cells (Fig. 1d), suggesting that TNF-α may drive Th9 cell differentiation through other Th9-related transcription factors. We also examined the expression of the other Th cell-related cytokines and transcription factors and found that TNF-α-treated Th9 cells did not express most of Th1-, Th2-, Th17- and Treg-related cytokines and transcription factors, such as Ifng, Il4, Il17, Tbx21, Gata3, Rorc and Foxp3 (Fig. 1d, e), although Il5 and Il13 were increased (Fig. 1e) in TNF-α-treated Th9 cells compared to regular Th9 cells. We also examined the effects of TNF-α on the expression of Il9 in Th9 cells at different time points. We found that the expression of Il9 in TNF-α-treated Th9 cells increased on Day 1, reached the highest level on Day 2 or Day 3, and then slightly decreased from the highest level on Day 4 (Fig. 1f). Together, these results demonstrated that TNF-α promotes Th9 cell differentiation in vitro.

    Fig. 1
    Fig. 1

    TNF-α drives Th9 cell differentiation in vitro. (a, b) Mouse naïve CD4+ T cells were cultured in the presence of anti-CD3/28 with the addition of TGF-β, IL-4, TNF-α or their combinations for 3 days. Cultures without the addition of any cytokines were used as controls. (a) qPCR analysis of Il9 gene expression in CD4+ T cells. Expression was normalized to Gapdh and set at 1 in cells treated with TGF-β plus IL-4 (Th9 cells). (b) ELISA assessment of IL-9 secretion in the cultures. (c-e) Naïve CD4+ T cells were cultured under Th9 polarizing conditions with or without addition of TNF-α for 3 days. Cell cultures without (Th0) addition of Th9-polarizing cytokines TGF-β and IL-4 were used as controls. (c) Flow cytometry analysis of IL-9-expressing CD4+ (IL-9+CD4+) T cells. Numbers in the dot plots represent the percentages of IL-9+CD4+ T cells. Right, summarized results of three independent experiments obtained as at left. (d, e) qPCR analysis of the indicated transcription factors (d) and cytokines (e). (f) Naïve CD4+ T cells were cultured under Th9 polarizing conditions in the presence or absence of TNF-α. Th0 cells were used as controls. Cells were collected at the indicated time points and qPCR analyzed the expression of Il9 in CD4+ T cells. Expression was normalized to Gapdh and set at 1 in Th9 cells collected on Day 1. Expression was normalized to Gapdh and set at 1 in Th9 cells. Data are representative of three (c) independent experiments or presented as mean ± SD of three (a-f) independent experiments. NS, non-significant; *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01

    TNF-α increases the survival and proliferation of Th9 cells in vitro

    The survival and proliferation of tumor-specific T cells are crucial for their persistence and therapeutic potential in vivo. We next examined the effects of TNF-α treatment on Th9 cell survival and proliferation. Naïve CD4+ T cells were cultured under Th9-polarizing conditions in the presence or absence of TNF-α for 6 h. RNA-seq analysis of the cultured T cells revealed that the addition of TNF-α decreased T cell expression of Casp9, Tradd, Tnfsf10, Dffb, Bid, Traf2, Cflar and Casp8 (Fig. 2a), the genes related to cell apoptosis, and increased the expression of Bcl2, Birc2, Birc3 and Nfkbia (Fig. 2a), the genes related to cell survival, suggesting that the addition of TNF-α during Th9 cell differentiation inhibits T cell apoptosis and promotes T cell survival.

    Fig. 2
    Fig. 2

    TNF-α increases the survival and proliferation of Th cells in vitro. (a) Mouse naïve CD4+ T cells were cultured under Th9 polarizing conditions with or without the addition of TNF-α for 6 h. The experiments were repeated three times. Cell samples (S1–3) were analyzed by RNA-seq. Pink-blue heatmap shows the log2-fold change of the differentially regulated expression of genes related to cell death pathways. Pink, higher expression; blue, lower expression. (b) Mouse naïve CD4+ T cells were cultured under Th0 or Th9 polarizing conditions in the presence or absence of TNF-α for 3 days. Flow cytometry analyzed Annexin V+ T cells. Numbers in the histograms represent the percentages of Annexin V+ T cells. Right, summarized results of three independent experiments obtained as the left. (c) Naïve CD4+ T cells were labeled with CFSE and cultured under Th0 or Th9 polarizing conditions in the presence or absence of TNF-α for 3 days. Flow cytometry analyzed CFSE-stained T cells. Numbers in the histograms represent the fluorescence intensity (FI) of CFSE-stained T cells. Right, summarized results of three independent experiments obtained as the left. MFI, mean fluorescence intensity. (d, e) Naïve CD4+ T cells were cultured as shown in (b). (d) qPCR assessed the expression of Pdcd1 in cultured T cells. (e) Flow cytometry analyzed the expression of CD44 by T cells. Numbers in the histograms represent the percentages of CD44+ T cells. Right, summarized results of three independent experiments obtained as the left. Data are representative of three (b, c, e) independent experiments or presented as mean ± SD of three (b-e) independent experiments. *P < 0.05

    To further exploit the role of TNF-α in Th9 cell survival and proliferation, Th9 cells with or without TNF-α-treatment were generated and cell death was assessed by Annexin V staining. While Th9 cells showed less cell apoptosis than Th0 cells (Fig. 2b), TNF-α treatment further reduced the apoptosis of Th9 cells (Fig. 2b). In addition, TNF-α treatment increased Th9 cell proliferation (Fig. 2c). These results demonstrated that TNF-α enhances T cell survival and proliferation during Th9 cell differentiation.

    PD-1 is an immune-checkpoint and PD-1 up-regulation promotes CD4+ T cell apoptosis [33]. We next examined the role of TNF-α on the expression of PD-1 by Th9 cells. While Th9 cells expressed lower mRNA levels of Pdcd1 than Th0 cells (Fig. 2d), TNF-α treatment further decreased the expression of Pdcd1 in Th9 cells (Fig. 2d). Furthermore, TNF-α treatment increased Th9 cell expression of CD44 (Fig. 2e), a marker for effector and memory T cells which contribute to T cell survival and proliferation [34]. Together, these results demonstrated that TNF-α enhances Th9 cell survival and proliferation in vitro.

    TNF-α treatment improves the antitumor efficacy of Th9 cells in vivo

    To assess the antitumor efficacy of TNF-α-treated Th9 cells, naïve CD4+ T cells from OT-II mice were differentiated into Th9 cells in the presence or absence of TNF-α. Cells were used to treat B16-OVA-bearing C57BL/6 mice. While Th9 cells mediated a higher inhibition on melanoma tumor growth than PBS control (Fig. 3a), the addition of TNF-α during Th9 cell differentiation further improved their antitumor efficacy (Fig. 3a), demonstrating that TNF-α improves the antitumor efficacy of Th9 cells.

    Fig. 3
    Fig. 3

    TNF-α-treated Th9 cells exhibit increased antitumor efficacy in vivo. (a) Naïve CD4+ T cells from OT-II mice were cultured under Th9 polarizing conditions with or without the addition of TNF-α for 2 days. C57BL/6 mice (five mice/group) were injected s.c. with 2 × 105 B16-OVA cells. On Day 2 after tumor challenge, Th9 or TNF-α-treated Th9 cells (1 × 106) were injected i.v. into the B16-OVA tumor-bearing mice. Mice treated by PBS served as controls. Shown are the tumor growth curves. The experiments were performed twice with a total of 10 mice per group (n = 10). (b-d) C57BL/6 mice were injected s.c. with 5 × 105 B16-OVA cells. OT-II Th9 cells and TNF-α-treated Th9 cells were generated in vitro as in (A). On Day 5 after tumor challenge, mice (n = 3/group) were given i.v. with Th9 or TNF-α-treated Th9 cells (3 × 106) or PBS control. On Day 3 after T cell transfusion, cells were isolated from tumor-draining lymph nodes (TDLNs). (b) Flow cytometry analysis of IL-9-producing CD4+ T cells. Numbers in the dot plots represent the percentages of double-positive T cells. Right, summarized results of three independent experiments obtained as at left. (c, d) CD4+ T cells were isolated from TDLNs by MACS. qPCR examined the expression of Il9 (c), Il5 and Il13 (d) in CD4+ T cells. (e) C57BL/6 mice were injected i.v. with 5 × 105 B16-OVA cells. OT-II Th9 and TNF-α-treated Th9 cells were generated in vitro as in (a). On Day 5 after tumor challenge, mice (n = 3/group) were given i.v. with Th9 or TNF-α-treated Th9 cells (3 × 106) or PBS control. On Day 3 after T cell transfusion, CD4+ T cells were separated from the lung tumor tissues by MACS. qPCR assessed the expression of Il9 in CD4+ T cells. Data are representative of three (b) independent experiments or presented as mean ± SD of three (b-e) independent experiments. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01

    The infiltration of effector T cells into tumor sites is associated with their antitumor effects. We next examined the tumor-infiltrating capability of TNF-α-treated Th9 cells. OT-II Th9 cells and TNF-α-treated Th9 cells were transfused to B16-OVA-bearing C57BL/6 mice, and cells from tumor-draining lymph nodes (TDLNs) were collected and analyzed. While mice transfused with Th9 cells had higher frequencies of IL-9+CD4+ T cells in TDLNs than PBS control mice (Fig. 3b), the percentages of IL-9+CD4+ T cells in TDLNs further increased in mice receiving TNF-α-treated Th9 cells compared to regular Th9 cells (Fig. 3b). In addition, TDLN CD4+ T cells from mice receiving TNF-α-treated Th9 cells expressed higher levels of Il9 (Fig. 3c), Il5 and Il13 (Fig. 3d) than mice transfused with Th9 cells or PBS control. We also examined CD4+ T cells isolated from pulmonary tumor tissues. As shown in Fig. 3e, cells from mice receiving TNF-α-treated Th9 cells expressed higher levels of Il9 than mice transfused with Th9 cells or PBS controls. These results indicated that TNF-α treatment increases the tumor-infiltrating capability of Th9 cells.

    TNF-α enhances Th9 cell differentiation through TNFR2

    There are two cell surface receptors for TNF-α, TNFR1 and TNFR2 [24]. CD4+ T cells expressed both TNFR1 and TNFR2 (Fig. 4a). We next explored the contribution of TNFR1 and TNFR2 to TNF-α-induced Th9 cell differentiation. TNFR1 (αR1) or TNFR2 (αR2) blocking antibodies were used during the in vitro differentiation of Th9 cells with or without the addition of TNF-α. The addition of αR1 did not affect the expression of IL-9 mRNA and protein in TNF-α-treated Th9 cells as compared to control IgG (Fig. 4b, c), whereas the addition of αR2 abolished TNF-α-induced up-regulation of IL-9 expression in Th9 cells (Fig. 4b, c). In addition, the addition of αR2 but not αR1 abolished the up-regulation of Il5 and Il13 expression induced by TNF-α in Th9 cells (Fig. 4d). These results indicated that TNFR2 but not TNFR1 mediates the stimulatory activity of TNF-α in Th9 cell differentiation.

    Fig. 4
    Fig. 4

    TNF-α enhances Th9 cell differentiation through TNFR2 but not TNFR1. (a) Flow cytometry examined analysis of TNFR1 and TNFR2 in mouse CD4+ T cells. (b-d) CD4+ naïve T cells were cultured under Th9 polarizing conditions in the presence of TNFR1 (αR1) or TNFR2 (αR2) blocking antibodies or an isotype control IgG (IgG) with or without (−) addition of TNF-α for 3 days. (b) ELISA assessed IL-9 secretion in the culture. (c, d) qPCR assessed the expression of Il9 (c) and Il5 and Il13 (d) in CD4+ T cells. (E-H) Naïve CD4+ T cells were isolated from wild type (WT), TNFR1−/− (R1−/−) or TNFR2−/− (R2−/−) mice and cultured under Th9 polarizing conditions with or without addition of TNF-α for 3 days. (e) Flow cytometry analysis of IL-9+CD4+ T cells. Numbers in the dot plots represent the percentages of IL-9+CD4+ T cells. Right, summarized results of three independent experiments obtained as at left. (f, g) qPCR analysis of Il9 (f), Il5 and Il13 (g) in CD4+ T cells. (h) qPCR analysis of Pdcd1 in T cells. (i) Naïve CD4+ T cells from WT, R1−/− and R2−/− mice were labeled with CFSE and cultured under Th9 polarizing conditions with or without the addition of TNF-α for 3 days. Flow cytometry analyzed CFSE-stained T cells. Numbers in the histograms represent the fluorescence intensity of CFSE-stained T cells. Right, summarized results of three independent experiments obtained as the left. Data are representative of three (a, e, i) independent experiments or presented as mean ± SD of three (b-i) independent experiments. NS, non-significant; *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01

    To further confirm the functional role of TNFR1 and TNFR2 in TNF-α-induced Th9 cell differentiation, naïve CD4+ T cells were isolated from WT, R1−/− and R2−/− mice and differentiated into Th9 cells in the presence or absence of TNF-α. As compared to WT cells, TNFR1-deficiency displayed minor effects on or even slightly increased TNF-α-induced Th9 cell production and Il9 expression by R1−/− Th9 cells (Fig. 4e, f). However, the capability of TNF-α in promoting R2−/− Th9 cell differentiation was completely abolished as demonstrated by significantly lower cell frequencies of R2−/− Th9 cells and lower Il9 expression by R2−/− Th9 cells as compared to TNF-α-treated WT Th9 cells (Fig. 4e, f). Notably, as compared to WT cells, R1−/− cells developed into more IL-9-expressing Th9 cells and R1−/− Th9 cells expressed higher levels of Il9 mRNA (Fig. 4e, f) in the cultures without the addition of TNF-α, indicating that the endogenously produced TNF-α reinforced R1−/− Th9 cell differentiation and suggesting that the TNF-α/TNFR1 signaling may counteract the signaling of TNF-α/TNFR2 in the induction of Th9 cells. Similarly, the deficiency of TNFR2 but not TNFR1 abolished the up-regulation of Il5 and Il13 expression in both Th9 cells and TNF-α-treated Th9 cells (Fig. 4g). Interestingly, while TNF-α-treated R1−/− Th9 cells had comparable expression of Pdcd1 as compared to TNF-α-treated WT Th9 cells (Fig. 4h), TNFR2 deficiency abolished TNF-α-induced inhibition of Pdcd1 expression in Th9 cells (Fig. 4h). Furthermore, the deficiency of TNFR2 but not TNFR1 abrogated TNF-α-induced stimulation of Th9 cell proliferation (Fig. 4i). Collectively, these results demonstrated that TNF-α stimulates Th9 cell differentiation through TNFR2 but not TNFR1.

    TNF-α enhances Th9 cell differentiation through TNFR2-STAT5 signaling

    We next exploited the downstream signaling pathways of TNFR2 that are responsible for TNF-α-induced Th9 cell differentiation. RNA-seq assay showed that the addition of TNF-α during Th9 cell differentiation decreased the expression of Stat1 and increased the expression of Nfkb2, Traf6, Irf1 and Irf4 (Fig. 5a), genes related to cytokine-induced signaling pathways. To exploit the proteins that may interact with TNFR2, naïve CD4+ T cells were cultured under Th9 polarizing conditions in the presence or absence of TNF-α and immunoprecipitation (IP) of the cell lysates was performed by using an anti-TNFR2 antibody, followed by mass spectrometry (MS) analysis of the immune precipitates. Interestingly, higher levels of STAT1 were detected in TNF-α-treated cells as compared to untreated control cells (Fig. 5b), suggesting that STAT signaling pathways may be involved TNF-α-induced Th9 cell differentiation.

    Fig. 5
    Fig. 5

    TNF-α enhances Th9 cell differentiation through STAT5. (a) The RNA-seq data mentioned in Fig. 2a were used. Pink-blue heatmap shows the log2-fold change of the differentially expressed genes of signaling pathways that are potentially involved in TNF-α-induced Th9 cell differentiation. (b) Naïve CD4+ T cells were cultured under Th9 polarizing conditions with or without addition of TNF-α for 3 h. Immunoprecipitation (IP) was performed by using anti-TNFR2 and proteins in the immune precipitate were analyzed by mass spectrometry (MS). Shown are the fold changes (TNF-α-Th9/Th9) of proteins with 2-fold cut-off. (c) Naïve CD4+ T cells were cultured under Th9 polarizing conditions with or without addition of TNF-α for 1 or 3 h. Western-blots examined the protein levels of the phosphorylated STAT family members (pSTAT1–6). β-actin was used as a loading control. (d) Naïve CD4+ T cells from WT, R1−/− or R2−/− mice were cultured under Th9 polarizing conditions with or without the addition of TNF-α for 3 h. Western-blots analyzed pSTAT5 and β-actin in T cells. (e, f) Naïve CD4+ T cells were cultured under Th9 polarizing conditions in the presence or absence of TNF-α with or without (DMSO) addition of STAT5 inhibitor (STAT5i) for 3 days. IL-9 expression was examined by qPCR (e) and ELISA (f). Data are representative of three (c, d) independent experiments or presented as mean ± SD of three (e, f) independent experiments. *P < 0.05

    We next explored the effects of TNF-α on the activation of STAT family members in T cells cultured under Th9 polarizing condition. Western-blots detected increased levels of phosphorylated (p) STAT1 (pSTAT1), pSTAT3 and pSTAT5 in T cells at Hour 3 compared to Hour 1 (Fig. 5c); whereas only pSTAT5 increased further in TNF-α-treated T cells compared to untreated controls at Hour 3 (Fig. 5c). These results indicated that TNF-α enhances STAT5 activation during Th9 cell differentiation.

    To determine the role of TNFR1 and TNFR2 in TNF-α-induced activation of STAT5, naïve CD4+ T cells were isolated from WT, R1−/− and R2−/− mice and cultured under Th9 polarizing conditions in the presence or absence of TNF-α. The addition of TNF-α remarkably increased pSTAT5 in R1−/− T cells as compared to the untreated control (Fig. 5d); however, TNF-α treatment exhibited minor effects on the protein levels of pSTAT5 in R2−/− T cells as compared to the untreated control (Fig. 5d). These results demonstrated that TNF-α activates STAT5 via TNFR2 but not TNFR1.

    To investigate the role of STAT5 signaling in TNF-α-induced Th9 cell differentiation, a STAT5 specific inhibitor (STAT5i) was used during Th9 cell differentiation. The inhibition of STAT5 significantly decreased IL-9 mRNA and protein expression in both TNF-α-treated Th9 cells and regular Th9 cells (Fig. 5e, f), indicating that TNF-α-induced Th9 cell differentiation relies on STAT5 signaling pathways. Collectively, these results demonstrated that TNF-α induces Th9 cell differentiation through TNFR2-mediated activation of STAT5.

    TNF-α enhances Th9 cell differentiation through NF-κB pathway

    RNA-seq assay showed that TNF-α increased the expression of Nfkb2 and Traf6 in T cells (Fig. 5a), genes related to NF-κB signaling pathway. To further determine the role of TNF-α in the activation of NF-κB pathway in T cells, naïve CD4+ T cells were treated with TNF-α under Th9 polarizing conditions and cells were analyzed by Western-blots. TNF-α treatment increased the protein levels of p-IKKα/β in T cells (Fig. 6a), indicating that TNF-α activates NF-κB pathway during Th9 cell differentiation.

    Fig. 6
    Fig. 6

    TNF-α enhances Th9 cell differentiation through NF-κB signaling pathway. (a) Naïve CD4+ T cells were cultured under Th9 polarizing conditions with or without addition of TNF-α for 3 h. Western-blots examined the protein levels of phosphorylated IKKα/β (p-IKKα/β) and IκB-α in cells. β-actin was used as a loading control. (b) 293 T cells were transiently transfected with vectors contained Il9 promoter or empty vector, followed by transfecting with vectors expressing the indicated NF-κB molecules. Luciferase reporter assay showed NF-κB-dependent activation of Il9 promoter in 293 T cells. (c, d) Naïve CD4+ T cells were cultured under Th9 polarizing conditions in the presence or absence of TNF-α with or without (DMSO) the addition of NF-κB inhibitor bortizomib (Bor) for 3 days. IL-9 expression was examined by qPCR (c) and ELISA (d). Data are representative of three (a) independent experiments or presented as mean ± SD of three (b-d) independent experiments. *P < 0.05

    To determine the role of TNFR1 and TNFR2 in TNF-α-induced activation of NF-κB, naïve CD4+ T cells from WT, R1−/− and R2−/− mice were treated with TNF-α under Th9 polarizing conditions. R1−/− CD4+ T cells treated with TNF-α have higher levels of p-IKKα/β than untreated controls (Fig. 6a); whereas TNF-α treatment exerted minor effects on the expression of p-IKKα/β in R2−/− CD4+ T cells (Fig. 6a), indicating that TNF-α activates NF-κB pathway mainly through TNFR2.

    We next explored the role of NF-κB pathway in TNF-α-induced Th9 cell differentiation. We first performed luciferase reporter assays to examine whether these NF-κB molecules could bind directly to Il9 promoters and stimulate its expression. We found that p50, c-Rel-p50, p50-RelB and p52-RelB dimmers could bind to and activate Il9 promoter (Fig. 6b). Bortezomib was used as an inhibitor of NF-κB pathway [11]. To further determine the role of NF-κB pathway in TNF-α-induced Th9 cell differentiation, Bortezomib was used during TNF-α-induced Th9 cell differentiation. Th9 cells treated by TNF-α plus bortezomib expressed lower levels of IL-9 mRNA and protein than those treated by TNF-α alone (Fig. 6c, d). These results indicated that TNF-α induces Th9 cell differentiation through NF-κB signaling pathway.

    Discussion

    Tumor-specific Th9 cells are potential effector cells for adoptive therapy of human cancers [6]. Therefore, identifying factors that can stimulate Th9 cell development may have important clinical significance. Recently, TNF family cytokines OX40L, TL1A, and GITRL have been shown to promote Th9 formation and their antitumor effects [20–23]. However, the role of TNF-α in Th9 cell differentiation and their antitumor functions remains unknown. In this study, we found that TNF-α potently promotes Th9 cell differentiation and IL-9 production. In addition, TNF-α stimulates IL-9 expression in T cells at multiple time-points between Day 1 and Day 4 during Th9 cell differentiation. More importantly, the adoptive transfer of TNF-α-treated Th9 cells induces more potent antitumor effects than regular Th9 cells in mouse tumor models. Multiple mechanisms may be involved in the increased antitumor capability of TNF-α-treated tumor specific Th9 cells. The addition of TNF-α increases Th9 cell expression of IL-9, which is a mediator of antitumor immunity [6, 16]. TNF-α increases the expression of IL-2 in T cells [35] and the survival and proliferation of Th9 cells, which may prolong their persistence in vivo [6]. Furthermore, the high tumor-infiltrating capability of TNF-α-treated tumor-specific Th9 cells may also contribute to their antitumor efficacy. Thus, our data identify TNF-α as a new powerful inducer of Th9 cells.

    TNF-α has two cell surface receptors TNFR1 and TNFR2 [24]. And T cells express both TNFR1 and TNFR2. In this study, we discovered that the blockade or depletion of TNFR2 in T cells abrogates the stimulatory effects of TNF-α on Th9 cell formation, indicating that TNFR2 downstream signaling is required for TNF-α-induced stimulation of Th9 cell formation. Compared to TNF-α/TNFR1 signaling, which has been shown to activate NF-κB, MAPK and caspase 8-mediated cell apoptotic pathways [36–38], the TNF-α/TNFR2 downstream signaling is not well characterized. Recent studies indicated that TNFR2 can interact with TRAF proteins TRAF1, 2 and 3 [39] and activate both the canonical and the noncanonical NF-κB signaling pathways [40, 41]. In this study, we found that TNF-α activates NF-κB signaling by increasing the expression of TRAF6 and p-IKKα/β in T cells. In addition, we discovered that TNF-α/TNFR2 signaling activates STAT5 pathway in T cells. And, blocking NF-κB or STAT5 by their specific inhibitors partially abrogates TNF-α-induced stimulation of Th9 cell formation. Therefore, TNF-α/TNFR2 signaling contributes to Th9 differentiation via two different mechanisms: the activation of (i) the transcription factor STAT5 and (ii) the TRAF6–NF-κB pathway. These two mechanisms may act synergistically to promote Th9 cell differentiation. Interestingly, published studies showed that STAT5 and NF-κB pathways are also involved in the stimulation of Th9 cell differentiation by other TNF family cytokines OX40L, TL1A, and GITRL [20–22], indicating that the TNF family cytokines may promote Th9 cell differentiation via some common signaling pathways.

    TNF-α stimulates T cell to express IL-2, IL-5 and IL-9, which activate STAT5 pathway [42–44], suggesting the potential of TNF-α to indirectly activate STAT5 in Th9 cells. However, we found that TNF-α/TNFR2 activates STAT5 at the early stage of Th9 differentiation, and we did not observe increased expression of IL-2, IL-5 and IL-9 in T cells during that stage (Fig. 5A). These observations indicate that TNF-α/TNFR2 signaling can directly activate STAT5 during Th9 cell differentiation.

    IL-5 and IL-13 are type-2 cytokines expressed primarily in Th2 and mast cells [45]. GATA3 is the master transcription factor for Th2 cells and controls the expression of Th2-derived cytokines, including IL-5 and IL-13 [45]. In this study, we found that TNF-α increases the expression of IL-5 and IL-13 in Th9 cells. However, TNF-α/TNFR2 signaling does not increase GATA3 expression, but activates the STAT5 and NF-κB pathways in T cells during Th9 cell differentiation. Interestingly, a previous study showed that STAT5 and NF-κB stimulate the expression of IL-5 and IL-13 in Th cells [46]. These observations suggest that TNF-α/TNFR2 signaling enhances the expression of IL-5 and IL-13 in Th9 cells through STAT5 and NF-κB pathways.

    Cytokine milieu is the major determinant for Th cell differentiation [47]. In this study, we observed that TNF-α/TNFR2 signaling promotes Th9 cell differentiation and increases the antitumor capability of tumor-specific Th9 cells. However, previous studies also showed that TNFR2 signaling enhances the differentiation, expansion and function of Treg cells [48–50], suggesting inhibitory effects on antitumor immunity. These observations imply that the TNFR2 signaling promotes the differentiation and functions of not only Th9 cells but also Treg cells, which suggests that TNF-α/TNFR2 signaling may exert both beneficial and detrimental effects on tumor immunotherapy. Detailed mechanisms underlying the different role of TNF-α/TNFR2 signaling in the induction of Th9 cells and Treg cells need to be defined. Further studies will be necessary to investigate strategies of converting the TNF-α/TNFR2 signaling to the induction of Th9 cells but not Treg cells in tumor immunotherapy.

    In summary, our study demonstrates that TNF-α potently promotes the induction of Th9 cells in vitro. And, the addition of TNF-α during Th9 cell differentiation increases T cell survival and proliferation. The adoptive transfer of TNF-α-treated Th9 cells induces potent therapeutic antitumor effects in mouse models. TNF-α drives Th9 cell differentiation via TNFR2 but not TNFR1, and TNF-α/TNFR2 signaling activates STAT5 and NF-κB pathways, which are required for TNF-α-induced Th9 cell differentiation. Our results identified TNF-α as a new powerful inducer of Th9 cells and clarified the molecular mechanisms underlying TNF-α-induced Th9 cell differentiation.

    Acknowledgments

    Not applicable.

    Authors’ contributions

    SW. and QY. initiated the study; SW. designed the experiments and wrote the paper; SW., YJ., JC., YZ., EB., TQ., YW. and AW. performed the experiments and statistical analyses; AW. read and edited the manuscript; SG. provided critical suggestions to this study.

    Notes

    Ethics approval and consent to participate

    Not applicable.

    Consent for publication

    Not applicable.

    Competing interests

    The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

    Publisher’s Note

    Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

    References

    1. 1.↵
      Restifo NP, Dudley ME, Rosenberg SA. Adoptive immunotherapy for cancer: harnessing the T cell response. Nat Rev Immunol 2012;12(4):269–281. PubMed PMID: 22437939. Epub 2012/03/23. eng.
    2. 2.↵
      Klebanoff CA, Gattinoni L, Palmer DC, Muranski P, Ji Y, Hinrichs CS, et al. Determinants of successful CD8+ T-cell adoptive immunotherapy for large established tumors in mice. Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research 2011 Aug 15;17(16):5343–5352. PubMed PMID: 21737507. Pubmed Central PMCID: PMC3176721. Epub 2011/07/09. eng.
    3. 3.↵
      Hunder NN, Wallen H, Cao J, Hendricks DW, Reilly JZ, Rodmyre R, et al. Treatment of metastatic melanoma with autologous CD4+ T cells against NY-ESO-1. N Engl J Med 2008 Jun 19;358(25):2698–2703. PubMed PMID: 18565862. Pubmed Central PMCID: PMC3277288. Epub 2008/06/21. eng.
    4. 4.↵
      Muranski P, Borman ZA, Kerkar SP, Klebanoff CA, Ji Y, Sanchez-Perez L, et al. Th17 cells are long lived and retain a stem cell-like molecular signature. Immunity 2011 Dec 23;35(6):972–985. PubMed PMID: 22177921. Pubmed Central PMCID: PMC3246082. Epub 2011/12/20. eng.
    5. 5.↵
      Muranski P, Boni A, Antony PA, Cassard L, Irvine KR, Kaiser A, et al. Tumor-specific Th17-polarized cells eradicate large established melanoma. Blood 2008 Jul 15;112(2):362–373. PubMed PMID: 18354038. Pubmed Central PMCID: PMC2442746. Epub 2008/03/21. eng.
    6. 6.↵
      Lu Y, Wang Q, Xue G, Bi E, Ma X, Wang A, et al. Th9 cells represent a unique subset of CD4(+) T cells endowed with the ability to eradicate advanced tumors. Cancer Cell 2018 Jun 11;33(6):1048–1060 e7. PubMed PMID: 29894691. Pubmed Central PMCID: PMC6072282. Epub 2018/06/13. eng.
    7. 7.↵
      Dardalhon V, Awasthi A, Kwon H, Galileos G, Gao W, Sobel RA, et al. IL-4 inhibits TGF-beta-induced Foxp3+ T cells and, together with TGF-beta, generates IL-9+ IL-10+ Foxp3(−) effector T cells. Nat Immunol 2008 Dec;9(12):1347–1355. PubMed PMID: 18997793. Pubmed Central PMCID: PMC2999006. Epub 2008/11/11. eng.
    8. 8.↵
      Veldhoen M, Uyttenhove C, van Snick J, Helmby H, Westendorf A, Buer J, et al. Transforming growth factor-beta 'reprograms' the differentiation of T helper 2 cells and promotes an interleukin 9-producing subset. Nat Immunol 2008 Dec;9(12):1341–1346. PubMed PMID: 18931678. Epub 2008/10/22. eng.
    9. 9.↵
      Angkasekwinai P, Chang SH, Thapa M, Watarai H, Dong C. Regulation of IL-9 expression by IL-25 signaling. Nat Immunol 2010 Mar;11(3):250–256. PubMed PMID: 20154671. Pubmed Central PMCID: PMC2827302. Epub 2010/02/16. eng.
    10. 10.
      Yao W, Zhang Y, Jabeen R, Nguyen ET, Wilkes DS, Tepper RS, et al. Interleukin-9 is required for allergic airway inflammation mediated by the cytokine TSLP. Immunity 2013 Feb 21;38(2):360–372. PubMed PMID: 23376058. Pubmed Central PMCID: PMC3582776. Epub 2013/02/05. eng.
    11. 11.↵
      Vegran F, Berger H, Boidot R, Mignot G, Bruchard M, Dosset M, et al. The transcription factor IRF1 dictates the IL-21-dependent anticancer functions of TH9 cells. Nat Immunol 2014 Aug;15(8):758–766. PubMed PMID: 24973819. Epub 2014/06/30. eng.
    12. 12.
      Chang HC, Sehra S, Goswami R, Yao W, Yu Q, Stritesky GL, et al. The transcription factor PU.1 is required for the development of IL-9-producing T cells and allergic inflammation. Nat Immunol 2010 Jun;11(6):527–534. PubMed PMID: 20431622. Pubmed Central PMCID: PMC3136246. Epub 2010/05/01. eng.
    13. 13.
      Staudt V, Bothur E, Klein M, Lingnau K, Reuter S, Grebe N, et al. Interferon-regulatory factor 4 is essential for the developmental program of T helper 9 cells. Immunity 2010 Aug 27;33(2):192–202. PubMed PMID: 20674401. Epub 2010/08/03. eng.
    14. 14.
      Liao W, Spolski R, Li P, Du N, West EE, Ren M, et al. Opposing actions of IL-2 and IL-21 on Th9 differentiation correlate with their differential regulation of BCL6 expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2014 Mar 4;111(9):3508–3513. PubMed PMID: 24550509. Pubmed Central PMCID: PMC3948278. Epub 2014/02/20. eng.
    15. 15.↵
      Liu Y, Yu S, Li Z, Ma J, Zhang Y, Wang H, et al. TGF-beta enhanced IL-21-induced differentiation of human IL-21-producing CD4+ T cells via Smad3. PLoS One 2013;8(5):e64612. PubMed PMID: 23741351. Pubmed Central PMCID: 3669387.
    16. 16.↵
      Lu Y, Hong S, Li H, Park J, Hong B, Wang L, et al. Th9 cells promote antitumor immune responses in vivo. J Clin Invest 2012 Nov;122(11):4160–4171. PubMed PMID: 23064366. Pubmed Central PMCID: PMC3484462. Epub 2012/10/16. eng.
    17. 17.↵
      Purwar R, Schlapbach C, Xiao S, Kang HS, Elyaman W, Jiang X, et al. Robust tumor immunity to melanoma mediated by interleukin-9-producing T cells. Nat Med 2012 Aug;18(8):1248–1253. PubMed PMID: 22772464. Pubmed Central PMCID: PMC3518666. Epub 2012/07/10. eng.
    18. 18.↵
      Uyttenhove C, Simpson RJ, Van Snick J. Functional and structural characterization of P40, a mouse glycoprotein with T-cell growth factor activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1988 Sep;85(18):6934–6938. PubMed PMID: 3137580. Pubmed Central PMCID: PMC282093. Epub 1988/09/01. eng.
    19. 19.↵
      Van Snick J, Goethals A, Renauld JC, Van Roost E, Uyttenhove C, Rubira MR, et al. Cloning and characterization of a cDNA for a new mouse T cell growth factor (P40). J Exp Med 1989 Jan 1;169(1):363–368. PubMed PMID: 2521242. Pubmed Central PMCID: PMC2189178. Epub 1989/01/01. eng.
    20. 20.↵
      Xiao X, Balasubramanian S, Liu W, Chu X, Wang H, Taparowsky EJ, et al. OX40 signaling favors the induction of T(H)9 cells and airway inflammation. Nat Immunol 2012 Oct;13(10):981–990. PubMed PMID: 22842344. Pubmed Central PMCID: Pmc3806044. Epub 2012/07/31. eng.
    21. 21.
      Richard AC, Tan C, Hawley ET, Gomez-Rodriguez J, Goswami R, Yang XP, et al. The TNF-family ligand TL1A and its receptor DR3 promote T cell-mediated allergic immunopathology by enhancing differentiation and pathogenicity of IL-9-producing T cells. Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md : 1950). 2015 Apr 15;194(8):3567–3582. PubMed PMID: 25786692. Pubmed Central PMCID: PMC5112176. Epub 2015/03/20. eng.
    22. 22.↵
      Kim IK, Kim BS, Koh CH, Seok JW, Park JS, Shin KS, et al. Glucocorticoid-induced tumor necrosis factor receptor-related protein co-stimulation facilitates tumor regression by inducing IL-9-producing helper T cells. Nat Med 2015 Sep;21(9):1010–1017. PubMed PMID: 26280119. Epub 2015/08/19. eng.
    23. 23.↵
      Zhao Y, Chu X, Chen J, Wang Y, Gao S, Jiang Y, et al. Dectin-1-activated dendritic cells trigger potent antitumour immunity through the induction of Th9 cells. Nat Commun 2016 Aug 5;7:12368. PubMed PMID: 27492902. Pubmed Central PMCID: PMC4980454. Epub 2016/08/06. eng.
    24. 24.↵
      Aggarwal BB. Signalling pathways of the TNF superfamily: a double-edged sword. Nat Rev Immunol 2003 Sep;3(9):745–756. PubMed PMID: 12949498. Epub 2003/09/02. eng.
    25. 25.↵
      Varfolomeev EE, Ashkenazi A. Tumor necrosis factor: an apoptosis JuNKie? Cell 2004 Feb 20;116(4):491–497. PubMed PMID: 14980217. Epub 2004/02/26. eng.
    26. 26.
      Brenner D, Blaser H, Mak TW. Regulation of tumour necrosis factor signalling: live or let die. Nat Rev Immunol 2015 Jun;15(6):362–374. PubMed PMID: 26008591. Epub 2015/05/27. eng.
    27. 27.↵
      Walczak H. TNF and ubiquitin at the crossroads of gene activation, cell death, inflammation, and cancer. Immunol Rev 2011 Nov;244(1):9–28. PubMed PMID: 22017428. Epub 2011/10/25. eng.
    28. 28.↵
      Summers deLuca L, Gommerman JL. Fine-tuning of dendritic cell biology by the TNF superfamily. Nat Rev Immunol. 2012 Apr 10;12(5):339–51. PubMed PMID: 22487654. Epub 2012/04/11. eng.
    29. 29.↵
      Croft M. The TNF family in T cell differentiation and function--unanswered questions and future directions. Semin Immunol 2014 Jun;26(3):183–190. PubMed PMID: 24613728. Pubmed Central PMCID: PMC4099277. Epub 2014/03/13. eng.
    30. 30.↵
      Valencia X, Stephens G, Goldbach-Mansky R, Wilson M, Shevach EM, Lipsky PE. TNF downmodulates the function of human CD4+CD25hi T-regulatory cells. Blood 2006 Jul 1;108(1):253–261. PubMed PMID: 16537805. Pubmed Central PMCID: PMC1895836. Epub 2006/03/16. eng.
    31. 31.↵
      Faustman D, Davis M. TNF receptor 2 pathway: drug target for autoimmune diseases. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2010 Jun;9(6):482–493. PubMed PMID: 20489699. Epub 2010/05/22. eng.
    32. 32.↵
      Vanamee ES, Faustman DL. TNFR2: a novel target for Cancer immunotherapy. Trends Mol Med 2017 Nov;23(11):1037–1046. PubMed PMID: 29032004. Epub 2017/10/17. eng.
    33. 33.↵
      Topalian SL, Hodi FS, Brahmer JR, Gettinger SN, Smith DC, McDermott DF, et al. Safety, activity, and immune correlates of anti-PD-1 antibody in cancer. N Engl J Med 2012 Jun 28;366(26):2443–2454. PubMed PMID: 22658127. Pubmed Central PMCID: PMC3544539. Epub 2012/06/05. eng.
    34. 34.↵
      Baaten BJ, Li CR, Deiro MF, Lin MM, Linton PJ, Bradley LM. CD44 regulates survival and memory development in Th1 cells. Immunity 2010 Jan 29;32(1):104–115. PubMed PMID: 20079666. Pubmed Central PMCID: 2858628.
    35. 35.↵
      McKarns SC, Schwartz RH. Biphasic regulation of Il2 transcription in CD4+ T cells: roles for TNF-alpha receptor signaling and chromatin structure. Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md : 1950). 2008 Jul 15;181(2):1272–1281. PubMed PMID: 18606681. Pubmed Central PMCID: PMC2484123. Epub 2008/07/09. eng.
    36. 36.↵
      Vlantis K, Pasparakis M. Role of TNF in pathologies induced by nuclear factor kappaB deficiency. Curr Dir Autoimmun 2010;11:80–93. PubMed PMID: 20173388. Epub 2010/02/23. eng.
    37. 37.
      van Horssen R, Ten Hagen TL, Eggermont AM. TNF-alpha in cancer treatment: molecular insights, antitumor effects, and clinical utility. Oncologist 2006 Apr;11(4):397–408. PubMed PMID: 16614236. Epub 2006/04/15. eng.
    38. 38.↵
      MacEwan DJ. TNF receptor subtype signalling: differences and cellular consequences. Cell Signal 2002 Jun;14(6):477–492. PubMed PMID: 11897488. Epub 2002/03/19. eng.
    39. 39.↵
      Cabal-Hierro L, Rodriguez M, Artime N, Iglesias J, Ugarte L, Prado MA, et al. TRAF-mediated modulation of NF-kB AND JNK activation by TNFR2. Cell Signal 2014 Dec;26(12):2658–2666. PubMed PMID: 25152365. Epub 2014/08/26. eng.
    40. 40.↵
      Rauert H, Wicovsky A, Muller N, Siegmund D, Spindler V, Waschke J, et al. Membrane tumor necrosis factor (TNF) induces p100 processing via TNF receptor-2 (TNFR2). J Biol Chem 2010 Mar 5;285(10):7394–7404. PubMed PMID: 20038584. Pubmed Central PMCID: PMC2844188. Epub 2009/12/30. eng.
    41. 41.↵
      Fischer R, Maier O, Naumer M, Krippner-Heidenreich A, Scheurich P, Pfizenmaier K. Ligand-induced internalization of TNF receptor 2 mediated by a di-leucin motif is dispensable for activation of the NFkappaB pathway. Cell Signal 2011 Jan;23(1):161–170. PubMed PMID: 20807567. Epub 2010/09/03. eng.
    42. 42.↵
      Yu A, Zhu L, Altman NH, Malek TR. A low interleukin-2 receptor signaling threshold supports the development and homeostasis of T regulatory cells. Immunity 2009 Feb 20;30(2):204–217. PubMed PMID: 19185518. Pubmed Central PMCID: Pmc2962446. Epub 2009/02/03. eng.
    43. 43.
      Zhu Y, Chen L, Huang Z, Alkan S, Bunting KD, Wen R, et al. Cutting edge: IL-5 primes Th2 cytokine-producing capacity in eosinophils through a STAT5-dependent mechanism. Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md : 1950). 2004 Sep 1;173(5):2918–2922. PubMed PMID: 15322148. Epub 2004/08/24. eng.
    44. 44.↵
      Elyaman W, Bradshaw EM, Uyttenhove C, Dardalhon V, Awasthi A, Imitola J, et al. IL-9 induces differentiation of TH17 cells and enhances function of FoxP3+ natural regulatory T cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009 Aug 4;106(31):12885–12890. PubMed PMID: 19433802. Pubmed Central PMCID: Pmc2722314. Epub 2009/05/13. eng.
    45. 45.↵
      Nakayama T, Hirahara K, Onodera A, Endo Y, Hosokawa H, Shinoda K, et al. Th2 cells in health and disease. Annu Rev Immunol 2017 Apr 26;35:53–84. PubMed PMID: 27912316. Epub 2016/12/04. eng.
    46. 46.↵
      Guo L, Wei G, Zhu J, Liao W, Leonard WJ, Zhao K, et al. IL-1 family members and STAT activators induce cytokine production by Th2, Th17, and Th1 cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009 Aug 11;106(32):13463–13468. PubMed PMID: 19666510. Pubmed Central PMCID: Pmc2726336. Epub 2009/08/12. eng.
    47. 47.↵
      2. Zhu J ,
      3. Yamane H ,
      4. Paul W
      . Differentiation of effector CD4 T cell populations (*). Annu Rev Immunol. 2010;28:445–489. doi:10.1146/annurev-immunol-030409-101212
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    48. 48.↵
      2. Mahmud S ,
      3. Manlove L ,
      4. Schmitz H ,
      5. Xing Y ,
      6. Wang Y ,
      7. Owen D , et al
      . Costimulation via the tumor-necrosis factor receptor superfamily couples TCR signal strength to the thymic differentiation of regulatory T cells. Nat Immunol. 2014;15:5 473–481. doi:10.1038/ni.2849
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    49. 49.
      2. Chen X ,
      3. Bäumel M ,
      4. Männel D ,
      5. Howard O ,
      6. Oppenheim J
      . Interaction of TNF with TNF receptor type 2 promotes expansion and function of mouse CD4+CD25+ T regulatory cells. J Immunol. 2007;179:1 154–161. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.179.1.154
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    50. 50.↵
      Torrey H, Butterworth J, Mera T, Okubo Y, Wang L, Baum D, et al. Targeting TNFR2 with antagonistic antibodies inhibits proliferation of ovarian cancer cells and tumor-associated Tregs. Sci Signal. 2017;10(462).

    Footnotes

    • Funding This work was supported by grants from National Natural Science Foundation of China (81372536 to SW and 81602485 to YZ) and the National Cancer Institute of USA (R01CA163881 and R01CA200539 to QY).

    • Availability of data and materials All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.