Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Proteases secreted by Trichinella spiralis intestinal infective larvae damage the junctions of the intestinal epithelial cell monolayer and mediate larval invasion

Veterinary Research volume 53, Article number: 19 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

The intestinal epithelium is the first natural barrier against Trichinella spiralis larval invasion, but the mechanism of larval invasion of the gut epithelium is not fully elucidated. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the excretory/secretory proteins (ESPs) of T. spiralis intestinal infective larvae (IIL) degrade tight junction (TJ) proteins, to assess the main ESP proteases hydrolysing TJ proteins using various enzyme inhibitors and to define the key invasive factors in IIL invasion of the gut epithelium. The results of immunofluorescence, Western blot and Transwell assays showed that serine proteases and cysteine proteases in the ESPs played main roles in hydrolysing occludin, claudin-1 and E-cad and upregulating claudin-2 expression. Challenge infection results showed that IIL expulsion from the gut at 12 hpi was significantly higher in mice which were infected with muscle larvae (ML) treated with a single inhibitor (PMSF, E-64, 1,10-Phe or pepstatin) or various mixtures containing PMSF and E-64 than in mice in the PBS group or the groups treated with an inhibitor mixture not containing PMSF and E-64 (P < 0.0001). At 6 days post-infection, mice which were infected with ML treated with PMSF, E-64, 1,10-Phe or pepstatin exhibited 56.30, 64.91, 26.42 and 31.85% reductions in intestinal adult worms compared to mice in the PBS group (P < 0.0001). The results indicate that serine proteases and cysteine proteases play key roles in T. spiralis IIL invasion, growth and survival in the host and that they may be main candidate target molecules for vaccines against larval invasion and development.

Introduction

Trichinella spiralis is an important zoonotic parasitic nematode of the genus Trichinella. T. spiralis infection is caused by the ingestion of raw or poorly cooked animal meat infected with encapsulated infective muscle larvae (ML). Adult worms (AWs) and ML lodge in the small intestine and skeletal muscles of a host. Following ingestion, the encapsulated ML in meat are liberated from their collagen capsules with the help of digestive fluids and activated into intestinal infective larvae (IIL) after coming into contact with gut contents or bile [1, 2]. IIL invade intestinal epithelial cells (IECs) and develop into the AW stage after undergoing four molts at 31 h post-infection (hpi). Pregnant AWs deposit newborn larvae (NBL), which migrate via the lymphatic and blood systems to the skeletal muscles, where they develop into encapsulated ML to complete the lifecycle [3, 4]. The gut epithelium is the first natural barrier against IIL intrusion and the principal site of interactions between the host and the nematode T. spiralis [5]. Nevertheless, the mechanism of IIL intrusion into the intestinal epithelium has not been fully elucidated [6, 7]. As T. spiralis larvae do not have oral appendices or a spike, intrusion of the gut epithelium is unlikely to be due to larval mechanical penetration; instead, it might be due to the degradation and destruction of the gut epithelium by various proteases in the excretory/secretory proteins (ESPs) of IIL [8,9,10]. The proteases in IIL ESPs are directly exposed to and contact the gut mucosa, and they might mediate IIL penetration of the gut epithelium [11, 12].

Previous studies have shown that when IIL are co-cultured with IEC monolayers, the IIL invade the monolayer and generate various kinds of proteases that pass into the IECs [13, 14]. The proteases secreted by intestinal parasites disrupt gut epithelial integrity and participate in parasite invasion of the gut mucosa [15,16,17]. The mucus layer secreted by intestinal goblet cells and gut epithelial columnar cells forms the native mechanical defence at the mucosal surface. Gut mucosal permeability is regulated by tight junctions (TJs) localized below the microvilli of adjacent epithelial cells. TJs are composed of claudins, adherens junctions, desmosomes and keratin filaments. Mucin and TJ proteins can be degraded and destroyed by diverse proteases produced by intestinal parasites. Serine proteases produced by the murine gut nematode Trichuris muris degrade the intestinal mucus barrier [18]. A cathepsin B-like (gCatB) enzyme produced by Giardia duodenalis trophozoites induces the degradation of the TJ proteins occludin and claudin-1 in the gut epithelial cell monolayer [19]. A recombinant cysteine protease from Spirometra erinaceieuropaei plerocercoid (rSeCP) hydrolyses fibronectin and collagen I/IV in vitro [20]. An Angiostrongylus cantonensis cathepsin B-like protease (Ac-cathB-1) has the capability to degrade fibronectin, laminin and the extracellular matrix of IEC-6 monolayers, and inhibition of Ac-cathB-1 enzymatic activity with antiserum partly impedes larval penetration of the gut [21]. Our previous studies demonstrated that anti-ESP immune serum inhibited T. spiralis invasion of IECs and larval development, suggesting that the ESPs might contain IEC invasion-related proteases [22]. T. spiralis aspartic protease in the ESPs cleaves several host proteins and facilitates larval invasion of IECs [23]. Specific binding of T. spiralis elastase-1 (TsEla) with host IECs promotes larval intrusion into IECs and the gut mucosa [24].

The aim of the present study was to investigate the degradation of and damage to the tight junctions (TJs) of IEC monolayers by T. spiralis IIL ESPs, to assess the main kinds of natural proteases with enzymatic activity in the ESPs using various enzyme inhibitors and to define the key IIL invasive factors for invasion of the gut epithelium. The various specific protease inhibitors used in this study included the serine protease inhibitor phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF), cysteine protease inhibitor E-64, aspartic protease inhibitor 1,10-phenanthrolin (1,10-Phe), metalloprotease inhibitor pepstatin A (pepstatin) and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA).

Materials and methods

Parasites and experimental animals

A Trichinella spiralis (ISS534) strain was isolated from a naturally infected pig in Henan Province, China. This strain was passaged in BALB/c mice in our department every 6 months. Female BALB/c mice (6–8 weeks old) were obtained from the Experimental Animal Center of Zhengzhou University (No. SCXK 2017-0001).

Collection of IIL and their ESPs

ML were obtained by artificially digesting the carcasses of mice infected with T. spiralis at 42 days post-infection (dpi) [25]. IIL were collected from T. spiralis-infected murine intestines at 6 hpi [26]. IIL ESPs was prepared as described previously [27, 28]. Briefly, after thorough washing with sterile physiological saline and serum-free RPMI 1640 medium (100 U penicillin/mL and 0.1 mg/mL streptomycin), IIL worms were cultured under the conditions of 5000 worms/mL of medium at 37 ℃ and 5% CO2 for 18 h. The supernatant containing IIL ESPs was concentrated at 4 ℃ and 5000 × g with an Amicon Ultra-3 Centrifugal Filter Unit (MW cut-off: 3 kDa).

Gut epithelial cell culture

The human colonic epithelial cell line Caco-2 was purchased from the Cell Resource Center of the Shanghai Institute for Biological Sciences of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. Caco-2 cells were cultured and maintained in Modified Eagle’s Medium (MEM)-ALPHA (Sigma–Aldrich, USA) supplemented with 10% foetal bovine serum (FBS) (Gibco), 100 U/mL penicillin, 0.1 mg/mL streptomycin and 100 mM non-essential amino acids (Solarbio, Beijing, China). Cells were seeded in T25 flasks (NEST, Wuxi, China) and cultured for 7 days. After being digested and isolated, the cells were cultured for 14–21 days to confluence on glass coverslips in 6-well plates. For all cell cultures, the medium was replaced two times weekly, and the cells were incubated at 37 ℃ in a 5% CO2 incubator [29, 30].

In vitro larval invasion of Caco-2 cells

To investigate the inhibitory effects of various protease inhibitors on IIL invasion of the intestinal epithelium, in vitro IIL intrusion into a Caco-2 cell monolayer was performed as previously reported [31, 32]. Briefly, ML were first activated with 5% mouse bile for 2 h at 37 °C to generate IIL [33]. The IIL were pre-incubated at 37 °C for 2 h with various doses of different inhibitors (1.25 mM PMSF, 24 μM E-64, 2.4 mM 1,10-Phe or 10 μM pepstatin) alone or in combination. The inhibitor stock solutions were made with the anhydrous solvent dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), and these solutions were diluted before use in the final cell medium (MEM). The final dilution of DMSO in the cell medium that was used as a negative or basal control was 0.1%. Then, 100 IIL treated with inhibitors were added to a cell monolayer and cultured in semisolid MEM-ALPHA (serum-free MEM and 1.75% agarose) at 37 °C and 5% CO2 for 2 h [34]. Larval invasion of the cell monolayer was examined and quantified under an inverted phase-contrast microscope [35]. The invaded worms were active and migratory in the monolayer and had a remarkable migratory path, whereas non-invaded worms were crimped on the surface of the monolayer [12]. The inhibition rate for larval invasion was calculated based on the mean number of invaded larvae in the inhibitor group compared with that in the PBS control group using the following formula: inhibition rate (%) for larval invasion = (mean number of invaded larvae in the PBS control group—mean number of invaded larvae in the inhibitor group)/mean number of invaded larvae in the PBS control group × 100%. To observe the larval migratory path, the agarose was removed, and the coverslips were washed twice with MEM-10% FBS. The cells were stained with the fluorescent nuclear dye propidium iodide (PI; 0.03 mg/mL in MEM-10% FBS) at 4 °C for 30 min. After being washed twice with MEM-10% FBS, the cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 30 min, washed in PBS, permeabilized and blocked in a blocking solution (PBS containing 0.1% Triton X-100 and 5% normal goat serum) at room temperature (RT) for 20 min. The monolayers were probed with mouse immune serum against IIL ESPs (1:100) at 37 °C for 1 h and then incubated with FITC-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (1:100, Servicebio, Wuhan, China) at RT in the dark for 40 min. Finally, the coverslips were mounted on glass slides and examined under a fluorescence microscope [36].

Indirect immunofluorescence test (IIFT)

To identify which kinds of proteases in IIL ESPs degrade the TJ proteins of the gut epithelium, 20 μg/mL ESPs was pre-treated at 37 °C for 2 h with various inhibitors (1.25 mM PMSF, 24 μM E-64, 2.4 mM 1,10-Phe or 10 μM pepstatin) or various inhibitor mixtures (PMSF + E-64 + 1,10-Phe + pepstatin, E-64 + 1,10-Phe + pepstatin, PMSF + 1,10-Phe + pepstatin, PMSF + E-64 + pepstatin or PMSF + E-64 + 1,10-Phe). Caco-2 cells were grown to confluence on glass coverslips in MEM [37], and the cell monolayers were incubated with treated ESPs at 37 °C for 2 h. Normal Caco-2 cells treated with 0.1% DMSO were used as a negative control, and 20 μg/mL ESPs without inhibitors was used to assess the hydrolysis of TJ proteins. After being washed with PBS, the monolayers were fixed with 4% formaldehyde for 20 min. After washing, the monolayers were permeabilized for 10 min with 0.25% Triton X-100 saponin in PBS and blocked with 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA; Sigma, USA). The monolayers were probed overnight at 4 °C with rabbit anti-human polyclonal antibodies against occludin (1:160), claudin-1 (1:16), and claudin-2 (1:125) (Thermo Fisher, USA) or a rat anti-human monoclonal antibody against E-cad (1:100; Santa Cruz, USA) and then incubated with Cy3-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (1:100) or FITC-conjugated goat anti-rat IgG (1:100; Servicebio) for 1 h at 37 °C. Finally, the monolayers were incubated for 5 min with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) to specifically stain cell nuclei [38, 39]. Upon completion of the staining procedure, the coverslips were transferred to glass slides and observed with fluorescence microscopy. Moreover, the cellular localization of TJ proteins was further examined under a fluorescence microscope and analysed with Olympus Fluoview software [40, 41].

Western blot analysis

Caco-2 cells were cultured in MEM-10% FBS. After being washed fully with PBS, the cell monolayers were incubated at 37 °C for 2 h in serum-free MEM with 20 μg/mL IIL ESPs pre-treated with various inhibitors (1.25 mM PMSF, 24 μM E-64, 2.4 mM 1,10-Phe or 10 μM pepstatin) alone or in mixtures. Normal Caco-2 cells treated with 0.1% DMSO were used as a negative control, and 20 μg/mL ESPs without inhibitors was used to assess the hydrolysis of TJ proteins. The cells were treated with a rubber cell scraper and mixed fully [42]. The cells were lysed in RIPA buffer (40 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.6, 150 mM NaCl, 2 mM EDTA, 10% glycerol, 1% Triton X-100, 0.2% SDS, 1 mM PMSF and a protease inhibitor cocktail), ultrasonicated in an ice bath for 30 s and centrifuged at 12 000 g for 15 min to remove any cell fragments. The cell protein concentration was measured with a Bradford assay. The soluble proteins from the cells were separated by 10% SDS–PAGE [43, 44]. The proteins were transferred to PVDF membranes (Millipore, USA). The membranes were blocked with 5% non-fat milk diluted in TBST at 37 °C for 2 h and cut into strips. The strips were probed using antibodies against occludin (1:500), claudin-1 (1:200), claudin-2 (1:200) or E-cad (1:100) (ThermoFisher, USA) overnight at 4 °C, and an anti-GAPDH antibody (1:1000) was used as an internal control [45]. The strips were incubated with HRP-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG or HRP-conjugated anti-rat IgG (1:5000; Southern Biotech, USA) at 37 °C for 1 h. Three washes with TBST were performed after each incubation. The strips were developed with an enhanced chemiluminescence kit (CWBIO, Beijing, China) [46, 47]. The optical density of each strip was measured with a scanner and quantified with ImageJ software [48]. The corresponding GAPDH expression levels were used as internal controls, and the results are expressed as a percentage relative to the normal Caco-2 cell control group.

Transwell assay

To investigate epithelial barrier breakdown by the main proteases in the ESPs secreted by IIL, a Transwell assay was performed according to the method in a publication on the interaction between the Giardia intestinalis secretome and IECs [49]. Briefly, glass coverslips were first placed in a 12-well Transwell system, and Caco-2 cells were grown to confluence on the glass coverslips in MEM-10% FBS. IIL were first pre-treated at 37 °C for 2 h with various inhibitors (1.25 mM PMSF, 24 μM E-64, 2.4 mM 1,10-Phe or 10 μM pepstatin) alone or in mixtures, as described in the IIFT subsection. Normal Caco-2 cells treated with 0.1% DMSO were used as a negative control, and normal IIL not treated with inhibitors were used to assess the ESP-mediated hydrolysis of TJ proteins. After being washed completely using PBS, two hundred IIL treated with inhibitors were added to the Transwell insert, which was placed in wells containing serum-free MEM and incubated at 37 °C for 2 h. Since the proteases in IIL ESPs could hydrolyse FBS in MEM and to avoid FBS hampering the hydrolysis of cell monolayer-expressed TJ proteins by IIL-secreted proteases, serum-free MEM was used when the IIL were co-cultured with Caco-2 cells in the Transwell system. As shown in Figure 1, the Caco-2 cell monolayer was directly exposed to IIL ESPs through the Transwell insert. After being washed using PBS, the glass coverslips with adhered Caco-2 cells were fixed, blocked, probed, stained and examined under a fluorescence microscope as described above.

Figure 1
figure 1

Transwell experimental system used for identifying direct interactions between the main IIL ESP proteases and Caco-2 cells. Caco-2 cells were cultured on glass coverslips in a 12-well Transwell chamber, and 200 IIL pre-treated with various inhibitors were added to the insert in serum-free MEM medium and incubated at 37 ℃ for 2 h. The inhibitor doses used in the Transwell assay were 1.25 mM PMSF, 24 μM E-64, 2.4 mM 1,10-Phe and 10 μM pepstatin. There was a filter membrane on the inserted sieve to prevent IIL from invading and destroying the Caco-2 cell monolayer, but ESPs could pass through the insert and directly contact the monolayer, thus affecting epithelial TJ proteins.

Full size image

SDS–PAGE analysis

To determine the key proteases in IIL ESPs involved in degrading host proteins, collagen I and fibronectin were used as the hydrolysis-sensitive substrates of proteases in IIL ESPs. Various doses of IIL ESPs (5.50, 8.25, 11.00, 13.75, and 16.50 μg) were first pre-treated at 37 °C for 30 min with various single inhibitors (1 mM PMSF, 10 mM EDTA, 20 μM E-64 or 10 μM pepstatin) or different inhibitor mixtures (EDTA + PMSF + E-64, EDTA + PMSF + pepstatin, EDTA + E-64 + pepstatin, PMSF + E-64 + pepstatin, or EDTA + PMSF + E-64 + pepstatin). A protease inhibitor cocktail (PMSF + E-64 + pepstatin + leupeptin + aprotinin + bestatin; BBI, Canada) was also used in this assay. Then, the ESPs treated with the various inhibitors were incubated with collagen I (4.5 µg) and fibronectin (5 µg) (Sigma, USA) at different pH values (4.5, 5.5, 6.5, and 7.5) overnight at 37 °C. The reactions were stopped by the addition of sample buffer containing 2% SDS and 1% β-mercaptoethanol [20, 23, 30]. IIL ESPs not treated with inhibitors were also used to hydrolyse collagen I and fibronectin, whereas IIL ESPs inactivated at 100 °C for 10 min were used as a negative control for proteases. The total volume of the mixture was 27.5 μL. All samples were denatured at 100 °C for 5 min, and 20 μL of each sample was analysed by SDS–PAGE analysis with 5% stacking gels and 12% resolving gels and Coomassie brilliant blue R-250 staining [50].

Challenge infection with inhibitor-treated T. spiralis larvae

To evaluate larval infectivity (invasive capacity), survival and development in the host gut following inhibitor treatment, T. spiralis ML were pre-incubated at 37 °C for 2 h with various inhibitors (1.25 mM PMSF, 24 μM E-64, 2.4 mM 1,10-Phe or 10 μM pepstatin) alone or in mixtures (PMSF + E-64 + 1,10-Phe + pepstatin, E-64 + 1,10-Phe + pepstatin, PMSF + 1,10-Phe + pepstatin, PMSF + E-64 + pepstatin or PMSF + E-64 + 1,10-Phe). ML treated with 0.1% DMSO or PBS were used as a negative or normal control. A total of 110 mice were divided into 11 groups (10 mice per group). Each mouse was infected orally with 300 ML treated with an inhibitor or mixture [4, 41]. The expelled IIL in faeces were collected within 12 h following challenge and counted as described previously [51]. The following formula was used: larval expulsion rate (%) = (mean number of expelled IIL in faeces/mean number of inoculated ML) × 100%. The infected mice were sacrificed at 6 dpi, intestinal adult worms were recovered and counted, and the reductions in adult worms between the inhibitor-treated group and the PBS control group were ascertained [52].

Statistical analysis

SPSS 22.0 software was used for all the data analyses in this study, and the data for larval invasion, protein expression levels, expelled IIL and intestinal adult burden are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). After being tested by Shapiro–Wilk’s test and Levene’s test to check the normality and homogeneity of the data, one-way ANOVA and Student’s t test were used to analyse inter-group differences. The correlation between inhibitor dose and larval invasion was compared with Spearman’s rank correlation (r) analysis. P < 0.05 was regarded as statistically significant.

Results

Inhibitory effects of various inhibitors on IIL invasion of Caco-2 cell monolayers

After IIL were cultured with a Caco-2 cell monolayer in semisolid MEM for 2 h, IIL invasion of the monolayer was examined by microscopy. The non-invaded larvae were coiled on the surface of the monolayer (Figure 2A), the invaded larvae migrated within the cell monolayer and left a migratory path in the monolayer, and dead cells remained (Figures 2B and C). The cell nuclei were dyed orange with PI, the ESPs secreted by the IIL were recognized with anti-ESP immune serum, and green fluorescence staining in the larval migratory path was observed (Figure 2D). Following agarose removal, the nuclei of damaged cells were intensely and uniformly stained orange by PI, showing the serpentine trail followed by the parasite (Figure 2E), and the IIL ESPs within the migratory path were probed using anti-ESP immune serum (Figure 2F).

Figure 2
figure 2

T. spiralis IIL invasion and migration in a Caco-2 cell monolayer. After a Caco-2 cell monolayer was covered with semisolid MEM containing IIL and cultured at 37 °C for 2 h, IIL invasion and migration were examined by microscopy. A Non-invaded larvae were coiled on the surface of the Caco-2 cell monolayer. B, C Invaded larvae left a migratory path in the monolayer. D The nuclei of dead cells were dyed orange with PI, IIL ESPs were recognized with anti-ESP immune serum, and green fluorescence in the cytoplasm of damaged cells was observed by fluorescence microscopy. E The nuclei of damaged cells were stained intensely and uniformly orange by PI, showing the serpentine trail left by the parasite. F The IIL ESPs within the migratory path were detected using anti-ESP immune serum. Scale bars: 20 μm.

Full size image

After different concentrations (0.25–1.50 mM) of PMSF were added to the semisolid medium and cultured with IIL for 2 h, compared with PBS control treatment, the percent inhibition values for IIL invasion in the monolayer were 3.85, 17.79, 34.97, 49.53, 53.28 and 55.31%, respectively (F = 189.030, P < 0.0001), and the inhibitory effect was dependent on the PMSF concentration (r = 0.972, P < 0.0001) (Figure 3A). The rates of IIL invasion inhibition achieved with various E-64 concentrations (4–24 μM) were 6.15, 9.85, 17.52, 22.65, 33.86 and 40.59%, respectively (F = 122.878, P < 0.0001), and the inhibitory effect was correlated with the E-64 concentration (r = 0.991, P < 0.0001) (Figure 3B). The inhibition of larval invasion by various 1,10-Phe concentrations (0.4–2.8 mM) was significant (F = 53.762, P < 0.0001), and the suppressive efficacy of 1,10-Phe was dose dependent (Figure 3C). When different doses (2–12 μM) of pepstatin were used, larval penetration was inhibited by 7.10, 7.28, 8.96, 10.46, 18.17 and 19.68%, respectively (F = 62.864, P < 0.0001) (Figure 3D). When the suppressive effects of the 4 inhibitors achieved with their optimal concentrations (1.25 mM PMSF, 24 μM E-64, 2.4 mM 1,10-Phe and 10 μM pepstatin) were compared, the rates of IIL invasion inhibition by PMSF, E-64, 1,10-Phe and pepstatin were 53.28, 40.59, 13.83 and 18.17%, respectively (F = 238.988, P < 0.0001) (Figure 3E). When mixtures of various inhibitors (PMSF + E-64 + 1,10-Phe + pepstatin, PMSF + E-64 + 1,10-Phe, PMSF + E-64 + pepstatin, PMSF + 1,10-Phe + pepstatin, and E-64 + 1,10-Phe + pepstatin) were used, the rates of IIL invasion inhibition by the 5 inhibitor mixtures were 75.18, 67.18, 61.83, 57.00 and 51.95%, respectively (F = 2783.849, P < 0.0001) (Figure 3F). The results indicated that PMSF had the strongest inhibitory effect on IIL invasion, followed by E-64, 1,10-Phe and pepstatin, suggesting that the IIL invasion-related proteases are principally serine proteases and cysteine proteases but that aspartic proteases and metalloproteases are also involved in IIL invasion of the gut epithelium.

Figure 3
figure 3

Inhibition of larval invasion of a Caco-2 cell monolayer with different concentrations of PMSF, E-64, 1,10-Phe or pepstatin. Various concentrations of diverse enzyme inhibitors were replenished in semisolid MEM, which was used to co-culture IIL with a Caco-2 cell monolayer for 2 h, and worm intrusion into the Caco-2 cell monolayer was examined under a microscope. The inhibitory effects of the various inhibitors on larval invasion are expressed as the inhibition (%) normalized to the PBS control group, and the results are expressed as the mean ± SD of three independent tests. A Various concentrations of PMSF. B Various concentrations of E-64. C Various concentrations of 1,10-phenanthroline (1,10-Phe). D Various concentrations of pepstatin. E Comparison of the suppressive effects of the 4 kinds of inhibitors on IIL invasion of Caco-2 cell monolayers when the optimal inhibitor concentrations (1.25 mM PMSF, 24 μM E-64, 2.4 mM 1,10-Phe and 10 μM pepstatin) were used. F: Comparison of the suppressive effects of mixtures of the various inhibitors on IIL invasion of Caco-2 cell monolayers. *P < 0.0001 compared with the DMSO control group.

Full size image

Gut epithelial TJ protein disruption caused by various proteases in IIL ESPs

To identify the main proteases in IIL ESPs related to gut barrier disruption, the damage caused by IIL ESPs to epithelial monolayers was investigated. The distribution and integrity of tight (occludin, claudin-1, and claudin-2) and adherens (E-cad) junction proteins were examined under a fluorescence microscope upon the addition of ESPs (20 μg/mL) to Caco-2 cell monolayers. In normal Caco-2 cells, occludin, claudin-1 and E-cad were distributed around the cell border; there was a small quantity of claudin-2 proteins around the cells (Figure 4). Moreover, occludin was also scattered within cell nuclei (Figure 5). However, after cells were treated with ESPs, the quantities of occludin, claudin-1 and E-cad around the cells were clearly reduced, and the continuous cell border staining was lost, showing that ESP treatment accelerated the degradation of occludin, claudin-1 and E-cad in epithelial cells, but claudin-2 expression was increased. Moreover, when ESPs treated with PMSF and E-64 were used, the cell border staining for occludin, claudin-1 and E-cad was more evident than that in the ESP, ESP + 1,10-Phe and ESP + pepstatin groups but was still weaker than that in the normal cell group, and claudin-2 expression was inhibited (Figure 4), indicating that the epithelial monolayer damage caused by IIL ESPs was blocked by pre-incubation with the inhibitors PMSF and E-64. The results suggested that occludin, claudin-1 and E-cad were degraded mainly by serine proteases and cysteine proteases in IIL ESPs, whereas these two types of proteases stimulated and upregulated claudin-2 expression.

Figure 4
figure 4

Immunofluorescence staining to localize tight and adherens junction proteins after Caco-2 cell monolayers were incubated with IIL ESPs treated with various single inhibitors. Caco-2 cell monolayers were incubated at 37 ℃ for 2 h with IIL ESPs pre-treated using various individual inhibitors (1.25 mM PMSF, 24 μM E-64, 2.4 mM 1,10-Phe or 10 μM pepstatin). Normal Caco-2 cells treated with 0.1% DMSO were used as a negative control, and 20 μg/mL ESPs without inhibitors was used to assess the hydrolysis of TJ proteins. The cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, permeabilized for 10 min with 0.25% Triton X-100 and blocked with 1% BSA. The cells were probed with primary antibodies against occludin, claudin-1, claudin-2 or E-cad and then incubated with FITC- or Cy3-conjugated secondary antibodies. Cell nuclei were stained blue with DAPI before being observed under a fluorescence microscope (1000×). Scale bars: 50 μm.

Full size image
Figure 5
figure 5

Immunofluorescence staining to localize tight and adherens junction proteins after Caco-2 cells were incubated with IIL ESPs treated with various inhibitor mixtures. IIL ESPs pre-incubated with different mixtures of 4 inhibitors were added to Caco-2 cell monolayers and incubated at 37 °C for 2 h. The cells were examined under a fluorescence microscope, and the cell nuclei were stained blue with DAPI. When the IIL ESPs were pre-treated with the 4-inhibitor mixtures (PMSF + E-64 + 1,10-Phe + pepstatin), the degradation of occludin, claudin-1 and E-cad by the IIL ESPs was completely blocked, while claudin-2 expression was restored. Scale bars: 50 μm.

Full size image

When IIL ESPs pre-incubated with different mixtures of the 4 inhibitors (PMSF, E-64, 1,10-Phe and pepstatin) were added to Caco-2 cell monolayers, the mixtures of the 4 inhibitors completely inhibited the degradation of occludin, claudin-1 and E-cad by the ESPs and restored claudin-2 expression (Figure 5). When mixtures of 3 inhibitors were used, the suppression of the hydrolysis of occludin, claudin-1 and E-cad was similar to that achieved with the mixtures of the 4 inhibitors only if PMSF and E-64 were included, further demonstrating that the degradation of occludin, claudin-1 and E-cad and damage to gut epithelial integrity in the cell monolayer were mainly caused by serine proteases and cysteine proteases in the ESPs. The results suggested that IIL ESPs have the capacity to destroy the gut epithelial barrier and mediate larval invasion of the gut mucosa.

Western blot analysis of TJ protein damage caused by various proteases in IIL ESPs

Caco-2 cell monolayers were incubated with IIL ESPs pre-treated with various inhibitors at 37 ℃ for 2 h. Western blot results showed that different inhibitors had various suppressive effects on the hydrolysis of Caco-2 cell tight and adherens junction proteins by the IIL ESPs. Compared to those in normal Caco-2 cells, the expression levels of E-cad, occludin and claudin-1 in Caco-2 cells incubated with IIL ESPs were obviously decreased (F = 5589.569, F = 366.977, F = 1428.259, P < 0.0001), but the expression levels of claudin-2 were evidently increased (F = 1817.892, P < 0.0001) (Figure 6). However, when mixtures of the 4 inhibitors were used, the expression levels of E-cad, occludin and claudin-1 were upregulated to the expression levels in normal Caco-2 cells (F = 0.022, F = 0.224, F = 0.024, P > 0.05). When PMSF, E-64 or various 3-inhibitor mixtures containing PMSF and E-64 were used, the suppression of the hydrolysis of occludin, claudin-1 and E-cad was more remarkable than that achieved with pepstatin, 1,10-Phe or the other 3-inhibitor mixtures lacking PMSF and E-64 (F = 68.419, F = 206.189, F = 68.594, P < 0.0001). Moreover, after PMSF, E-64 or various 3-inhibitor mixtures containing PMSF and E-64 were used, the protein expression levels of claudin-2 were reduced compared to those in the IIL ESP, pepstatin and 1,10-Phe groups (F = 88.046, P < 0.0001). The results further indicated that the TJ proteins (occludin, claudin-1 and E-cad) of the gut epithelium were principally hydrolysed by serine proteases and cysteine proteases in IIL ESPs and that these two types of proteases also upregulated claudin-2 expression in the gut epithelium.

Figure 6
figure 6

Western blot analysis of the hydrolysis of TJ and adherens proteins in Caco-2 cells by various proteases in IIL ESPs. A Caco-2 cell monolayers were incubated with IIL ESPs pre-treated with various inhibitors (1.25 mM PMSF, 24 μM E-64, 2.4 mM 1,10-Phe or 10 μM pepstatin) alone or in mixtures at 37 ℃ for 2 h. Normal Caco-2 cells treated with 0.1% DMSO were used as a negative control, and 20 μg/mL ESP without inhibitors was used to assess the hydrolysis of TJ proteins. The expression of TJ and adherens junction proteins was analysed by Western blotting. GAPDH was used as an internal reference control. B–E Densitometric analysis of the bands obtained in A for E-cad (B), occludin (C), claudin-1 (D) and claudin-2 (E) relative to the GAPDH band. *P < 0.05 compared to normal Caco-2 cells.

Full size image

Gut epithelial TJ protein disruption by various proteases in IIL ESPs measured with Transwell assays

The results of a Transwell assay showed that the direct disruption of TJ proteins by IIL ESPs was similar to that achieved with ESPs collected from in vitro-cultured IIL. PMSF and E-64 had obvious inhibitory effects on the IIL ESP-mediated hydrolysis of occludin, claudin-1 and E-cad, and the inhibitors also suppressed the expression-enhancing effect of IIL ESPs on claudin-2 (Figure 7). When IIL were treated with various inhibitor mixtures, the fluorescence intensities of occludin, claudin-1 and E-cad were obviously decreased in the E-64 + 1,10-Phe + pepstatin and PMSF + 1,10-Phe + pepstatin groups compared with the other three groups (PMSF + E-64 + 1,10-Phe, PMSF + E-64 + pepstatin, and PMSF + E-64 + 1,10-Phe + pepstatin). However, claudin-2 staining was increased compared to the staining for the other TJ proteins (Figure 8). The results also demonstrated that the degradation of occludin, claudin-1 and E-cad in cell monolayers was principally mediated by serine proteases and cysteine proteases in IIL ESPs, whereas IIL ESPs increased claudin-2 expression.

Figure 7
figure 7

Immunofluorescence staining to localize TJ and adherens junction proteins after Caco-2 cells were incubated with IIL ESPs treated with various inhibitors in a Transwell system. Caco-2 cells were cultured on glass coverslips in a Transwell system, and 200 IIL pre-treated with various inhibitors (1.25 mM PMSF, 24 μM E-64, 2.4 mM 1,10-Phe or 10 μM pepstatin) were incubated on the insert at 37 ℃ for 2 h. Normal Caco-2 cells treated with 0.1% DMSO were used as a negative control, and normal IIL not treated with inhibitors were used to assess the ESP-mediated -hydrolysis of TJ proteins. The cells were fixed, blocked, and probed with antibodies against occludin, claudin-1, claudin-2 or E-cad followed by FITC- or Cy3-conjugated secondary antibodies. Cell nuclei were dyed blue with DAPI before examination by fluorescence microscopy (1000×). Scale bars: 50 μm.

Full size image
Figure 8
figure 8

Immunofluorescence localization of TJ and adherens junction proteins after Caco-2 cells were incubated with IIL ESPs treated with inhibitor mixtures in a Transwell system. Caco-2 cells were cultured on glass coverslips in a Transwell system, and 200 IIL pre-treated with various inhibitor mixtures were incubated on the insert at 37 ℃ for 2 h. The cells were fixed, blocked, probed with antibodies against occludin, claudin-1, claudin-2 or E-cad and then stained using FITC- or Cy3-labelled secondary antibodies. Cell nuclei were stained blue with DAPI before examination by fluorescence microscopy (1000×). Scale bars: 50 μm.

Full size image

Inhibition of the ESP-mediated hydrolysis of collagen I and fibronectin by various inhibitors

SDS–PAGE analysis revealed that the optimum pH value for the ESP-mediated hydrolysis of collagen I was pH 5.5 (Figure 9A). Different ESP doses (5.50, 8.25, 11.00, 13.75, and 16.50 μg) could degrade 4.5 μg of collagen I (Figure 9B), and the ESP-mediated hydrolysis of collagen I was blocked by EDTA (Figure 9C). Various inhibitor mixtures containing EDTA significantly suppressed the ESP-mediated hydrolysis of collagen I, but a mixture (E-64 + PMSF + pepstatin) without EDTA did not inhibit the hydrolysis of collagen I (Figure 9D). The results suggested that the ESP proteases involved in hydrolysing collagen I were mainly metalloproteases.

Figure 9
figure 9

SDS–PAGE analyses of the main proteases in ESPs capable of hydrolysing collagen I (COI) and fibronectin (Fib). Lane M: protein marker. A ESPs (8.25 μg) hydrolysed COI (4.5 µg) at different pH values. Lane 1: ESPs; Lanes 2, 4, 6 and 8: COI at pH 4.5, 5.5, 6.5 and 7.5, respectively; Lanes 3, 5, 7 and 9: ESPs + COI at pH 4.5, 5.5, 6.5 and 7.5, respectively. B Various ESP doses degraded COI (4.5 µg) at pH 5.5. Lane 1: ESPs; Lane 2: COI; Lanes 3–7: ESPs (5.50, 8.25, 11.00, 13.75 and 16.50 μg, respectively) + COI. C Various inhibitors (1 mM PMSF, 10 mM EDTA, 20 μM E-64 or 10 μM pepstatin) suppressed the ESP-mediated hydrolysis of COI. Lane 1: COI; Lane 2: ESPs + COI; Lane 3: inactivated ESPs + COI; Lane 4: (ESPs + E-64) + COI; Lane 5: (ESPs + PMSF) + COI; Lane 6: (ESPs + pepstatin) + COI; Lane 7: (ESPs + EDTA) + COI. D Inhibitor mixtures suppressed the ESP-mediated hydrolysis of COI. Lane 1: COI; Lane 2: ESPs; Lane 3: ESPs + COI; Lane 4: inactivated ESPs + COI; Lane 5: (ESPs + E-64 + PMSF + pepstatin) + COI; Lane 6: (ESPs + E-64 + PMSF + EDTA) + COI; Lane 7: (ESPs + E-64 + pepstatin + EDTA) + COI; Lane 8: (ESPs + PMSF + pepstatin + EDTA) + COI; Lane 9: (ESPs + E-64 + PMSF + pepstatin + EDTA) + COI; Lane 10: (ESPs + inhibitor cocktail) + COI. E ESPs (8.25 μg) hydrolysed Fib (5 μg) at various pH values. Lane 1: ESPs; Lanes 2, 4, 6 and 8: Fib; Lanes 3, 5, 7, and 9: ESPs + Fib at pH 4.5, 5.5, 6.5 and 7.5, respectively. F Various ESP doses hydrolysed Fib. Lane 1: ESPs; Lane 2: Fib; Lanes 3–8: ESPs (2.5, 5.0, 7.5, 10.0, 12.5 and 15.0 μg, respectively) + Fib. G Inhibitors suppressed the ESP-mediated hydrolysis of Fib. Lane 1: Fib; Lane 2: ESPs + Fib; Lane 3: inactivated ESPs + Fib; Lane 4: (ESPs + E-64) + Fib; Lane 5: (ESPs + PMSF) + Fib; Lane 6: (ESPs + pepstatin) + Fib; Lane 7: (ESPs + EDTA) + Fib. H Inhibitor mixtures suppressed the ESP-mediated hydrolysis of Fib. Lane 1: Fib; Lane 2: ESPs; Lane 3: ESPs + Fib; Lane 4: inactivated ESPs + Fib; Lane 5: (ESPs + E-64 + PMSF + pepstatin) + Fib; Lane 6: (ESPs + E-64 + PMSF + EDTA) + Fib; Lane 7: (ESPs + E-64 + pepstatin + EDTA) + Fib; Lane 8: (ESPs + PMSF + pepstatin + EDTA) + Fib; Lane 9: (ESPs + E-64 + PMSF + pepstatin + EDTA) + Fib; Lane 10: (ESPs + inhibitor cocktail) + Fib.

Full size image

When fibronectin was used as the substrate, the optimal pH for ESP hydrolytic activity was pH 6.5 (Figure 9E). The optimum dose of ESPs for hydrolysis of 5 µg of Fib was 12.5 µg (Figure 9F). None of the 4 protease inhibitors (E-64, PMSF, pepstatin or EDTA) inhibited the ESP-mediated hydrolysis of fibronectin (Figure 9G). Diverse inhibitor mixtures containing PMSF suppressed the ESP-mediated hydrolysis of fibronectin, but a mixture without PMSF did not inhibit fibronectin hydrolysis (Figure 9H). The results suggested that the ESP proteases involved in hydrolysing fibronectin were primarily serine proteases.

Protease inhibitors impaired larval infectivity and survival in the host

After treatment with various inhibitors, the IIL expelled from the gut within 12 h after challenge were recovered. The results showed that the IIL expulsion rates of mice infected with ML treated with various inhibitors (PMSF, E-64, 1,10-Phe, or pepstatin) alone or in mixtures were significantly higher than that of mice in the PBS group (F = 89.311, P < 0.0001), but the solvent DMSO control group did not exhibit any evident worm expulsion compared to the PBS group (P > 0.05) (Figure 10A). Furthermore, when a mixture of the 4 inhibitors and other various inhibitor mixtures containing PMSF and E-64 were used, the IIL expulsion rates were obviously higher than those of the individual inhibitors and inhibitor mixtures without PMSF and E-64 (F = 41.597, F = 19.323, P < 0.0001). Compared to those in the PBS group, the mice which were inoculated with larvae treated with PMSF, E-64, 1,10-Phe or pepstatin showed 56.30, 64.91, 26.42 and 31.85% reductions in gut adult worms at 6 days after challenge (F = 188.163, P < 0.0001). The adult worm burdens of the PMSF and E-64 groups were remarkably lower than those of the 1,10-Phe and pepstatin control group (F = 107.484, F = 86.087, P < 0.0001). Moreover, the adult worm burdens of various mixed inhibitor groups were distinctly inferior to those of the 1,10-Phe and pepstatin control group (F = 258.082, F = 233.951, P < 0.0001) (Figure 10B). The results demonstrated that the protease inhibitors PMSF and E-64 prominently reduced larval infectivity and impeded larval development and survival in the host intestines, suggesting that serine proteases and cysteine proteases play vital roles in T. spiralis larval invasion, growth and survival, while other proteases (aspartic proteases and metalloproteases) also participate in larval invasion and development.

Figure 10
figure 10

The IIL expelled in faeces and intestinal adult worms in mice infected with larvae treated with various inhibitors. A Expelled IIL larvae in faeces within 12 h following challenge infection (n = 10). B Intestinal adult worm burden (n = 10). The data are shown as the mean ± SD of the various inhibitor, DMSO control and PBS control groups. ML treated with 0.1% DMSO or PBS were used as the negative or normal control. *P < 0.0001 relative to the PBS control group.

Full size image

Discussion

The mucosal surfaces of the intestinal tract are the most important site for intestinal parasite entry into the host and are important sites of parasitic diseases. An essential function of the intestinal epithelium is to act as a natural barrier that limits pathogen invasion. IECs, which line the gut mucosal surfaces, are an important mechanical barrier that prevent parasite invasion of host tissues, and they are also the first site of interaction between the parasites and host. Additionally, IECs perform an important function in ion transport and fluid absorption. Gut epithelial barrier function requires a continuous cell layer as well as the junctions that seal the paracellular space between IECs. TJs are intercellular junctions between IECs, which are essential for gut epithelial adhesion and barrier function. This barrier regulates nutrient and water absorption while limiting the invasion of bacteria and other pathogens into the bowel lumen [53]. In the IEC monolayer, there is an apical junction complex (AJC) composed of TJs, adherens junctions and desmosomes. AJCs between cells form a sealed barrier to prevent microbes and antigens from moving between epithelial cells. TJ proteins include many transmembrane proteins. Mammalian TJ proteins are mainly composed of claudin 1-claudin 27, occludin and junction adhesion molecules (JAMs) [54]. The presence of claudins in TJs is considered to determine the “tightness” of the specific epithelium, and adherens junction proteins are mainly cadherin and connective protein. Disruption of TJs can result in gut epithelial barrier damage and facilitate mucosal invasion by Entamoeba histolytica trophozoites [55]. The ESPs of Haemonchus contortus and Teladorsagia circumcincta adults disrupt the TJs of cultured epithelial cells. Gut epithelial permeability is notably elevated, and the degradation of the TJ protein occludin also occurs during T. spiralis infection [56]. During T. spiralis infection, the expression of the gut epithelial TJ proteins occludin and claudin-3 was found to be downregulated beginning at 2 days post-infection, whereas claudin-2 was overexpressed. These changes were associated with increases in in vitro and in vivo epithelial permeability [57].

Proteases play key roles during physiological processes of the gut epithelial barrier, and they are divided into four different kinds, namely, serine proteases, cysteine proteases, aspartic proteases and metalloproteinases [58]. Proteases have received notable attention as important biological molecules in the lifecycle of parasites. Gut proteases produced by intestinal parasites have multiple effects on intestinal barrier function mediated by acting on several elements forming intercellular tight junctions between IECs [18]. They are involved in the processes of host tissue invasion and degradation, larval migration, nutrition, and host immune response escape [15, 16]. Various proteases have been identified in the ESPs and crude antigens of T. spiralis ML and adult worms by zymography, proteomics and immunoproteomics [10, 11, 59]. As IIL are the first invasive stage of the T. spiralis lifecycle, penetrating the host gut mucosa, different proteases produced during the IIL stage were also screened and identified [9, 27]. However, which kinds of IIL proteases play vital roles in IIL penetration of the gut epithelium is not clear. The proteases in the ESPs produced by T. spiralis IIL are first exposed directly to the host gut intestinal mucosa; they might hydrolyse the TJ proteins of IECs, destroy the barrier integrity of the intestinal epithelium, and mediate IIL invasion of the gut mucosa [60]. Therefore, in the present study, the role of IIL ESPs in host gut epithelium invasion was first investigated through an in vitro model of IIL invasion of IEC monolayers, and then which kinds of main proteases are involved in the destruction and invasion of the intestinal epithelium were ascertained by using various enzyme inhibitors and an animal infection experiment.

As shown in Figure 2, IIL invaded and migrated within Caco-2 cell monolayers, leaving a serpentine migratory trail in each monolayer. The migratory paths were probed using anti-ESP immune serum, which suggested that the IIL produced and left ESPs during larval intrusion and migration. When four kinds of inhibitors (PMSF, E-64, 1,10-Phe and pepstatin) were added to the co-culture medium for IIL and Caco-2 cells for 2 h, all four inhibitors suppressed larval invasion of the monolayer, and the suppressive effects were dose dependent. The results also indicated that PMSF had the strongest inhibitory effect on larval invasion, followed by E-64, 1,10-Phe and pepstatin, suggesting that the IIL invasion-related proteases are principally serine proteases and cysteine proteases but that aspartic proteases and metalloproteases are also involved in IIL invasion of the gut epithelium. Previous studies have shown that recombinant serine proteases [61,62,63], cysteine proteases [17, 41, 64], aspartic proteases [23] and metalloproteases [33, 52] from T. spiralis larvae promote larval invasion of IECs and the gut mucosa, whereas specific antibodies and siRNAs specific for these recombinant proteases impede penetration of the gut epithelium. The results suggested the important functions of the IIL ESP proteases in larval invasion of the IEC monolayer.

The IIFT results showed that the gut epithelial TJ proteins occludin, claudin-1 and E-cad were visible around the borders of normal Caco-2 cells, while only a small quantity of claudin-2 was present. After ESP treatment, the quantities of occludin, claudin-1 and E-cad around the cells were remarkably reduced, as they lost their continuous cell border staining, but claudin-2 expression was increased, suggesting that the ESPs degraded occludin, claudin-1 and E-cad but stimulated claudin-2 expression. When IIL ESPs treated with PMSF and E-64 were used, the cell border staining of occludin, claudin-1 and E-cad was more evident than that in the ESP, ESP + 1,10-Phe and ESP + pepstatin groups but was still weaker than that in the normal cell group, and claudin-2 expression was inhibited. When different mixtures of the 4 inhibitors (PMSF, E-64, 1,10-Phe and pepstatin) were used, the mixtures containing all 4 inhibitors completely blocked the degradation of occludin, claudin-1 and E-cad by ESPs and restored claudin-2 expression. When different mixtures of 3 inhibitors were used, the suppression of the hydrolysis of occludin, claudin-1 and E-cad was similar to that achieved with the mixtures of 4 inhibitors only when PMSF and E-64 were included in the mixture. The results suggested that occludin, claudin-1 and E-cad were degraded mainly by serine proteases and cysteine proteases in ESPs, whereas these two types of proteases induced upregulated claudin-2 expression, demonstrating that disruption of gut epithelial integrity and damage to the gut epithelium were mainly caused by serine proteases and cysteine proteases in IIL ESPs, which might destroy the natural gut epithelial barrier and facilitate larval invasion of the gut mucosa. As shown in Figures 7 and 8, when the Transwell assay was performed, the direct disruption of gut epithelial integrity by IIL ESPs was similar to that observed with ESPs added directly to a Caco-2 cell monolayer. The Transwell assay suggests that the degradation of the intestinal epithelial barrier does not require direct contact between IIL and gut epithelial cells; instead, it is the consequence of the action of IIL ESPs. The Western blot results showed that ESPs clearly hydrolysed occludin, claudin-1 and E-cad and increased claudin-2. The hydrolysis of occludin, claudin-1 and E-cad in the gut epithelium was also principally mediated by serine proteases and cysteine proteases in ESPs. Previous studies showed that giardipain-1 (a mature cathepsin B-like enzyme) from Giardia lamblia trophozoites degraded the tight junction proteins occludin and claudin-1 in a rat intestinal epithelial cell (IEC6) monolayer, that the epithelial monolayer damage caused by giardipain-1 was blocked by preincubation with the inhibitor E-64 and that silencing the giardipain-1 gene in trophozoites lowered the proteolytic activity of giardipain-1 and reduced the damage to cell monolayers [19]. Cysteine proteases secreted by G. lamblia disrupt intestinal epithelial cell junctional complexes [29]. These results indicate that cysteine proteases are the main virulence factors of Giardia trophozoites. The recombinant Entamoeba histolytica cysteine protease (rEhCP112) results in in vitro and in vivo damage to TJ functions, and rEhCP112 degrades claudin-1, thus affecting interepithelial adhesion. EhCP112 could be a potential therapeutic target in amoebiasis [38]. The serine proteases of T. spiralis muscle larvae might reduce the expression of TJ proteins via the P38-MAPK signalling pathway and reduce intestinal barrier integrity [65]. The results of this study show that serine proteases and cysteine proteases in ESPs are the main invasive factors of T. spiralis IIL that degrade the TJ proteins of the gut epithelium and mediate larval invasion [37, 44, 66].

Collagen is an important component of the basement membrane, which forms the skeleton of the extracellular matrix. Fibronectin is a component of the extracellular matrix that binds to cells. Tight junctions are the structural connections formed between cells and the extracellular matrix. Collagen, fibronectin and tight junction proteins are important components of the cell-to-cell and cell-to-extracellular matrix networks, which together constitute the cellular barrier system of the intestinal epithelium [67]. To further investigate the IIL EPS-mediated disruption of the cellular barrier function of the intestinal epithelium, the ESP-mediated hydrolysis of collagen I and fibronectin was also evaluated in this study. SDS–PAGE results showed that ESPs could hydrolyse collagen I and fibronectin but that inactivated ESPs did not have a hydrolysing effect on collagen I and fibronectin, suggesting that the proteases in ESPs might act by hydrolysing host proteins. In addition, hydrolysis was blocked by inhibitor mixtures containing EDTA or PMSF. The results demonstrated that the principal proteases in ESPs that degrade collagen I and fibronectin are metalloproteases and serine proteases. Furthermore, as shown in Figure 9A, E, ESPs had high hydrolytic activity resulting in collagen I degradation at pH 5.5 and fibronectin degradation at pH 6.5; these pH values are similar to those of the normal intestinal milieu (pH 6 in the duodenum), suggesting that metalloproteases and serine proteases in ESPs also play a crucial role in the degradation of the extracellular matrix of the gut epithelium. The mouse challenge infection results showed that the gut IIL expulsion at 12 hpi of mice infected with ML treated with various single inhibitors (PMSF, E-64, 1,10-Phe, or pepstatin) or mixtures of the inhibitors was significantly higher than that of mice in the PBS group. When various inhibitor mixtures containing PMSF and E-64 were used, IIL expulsion from the gut was obviously higher than that observed with individual inhibitors and inhibitor mixtures not containing PMSF and E-64. At 6 dpi, the mice which were infected with ML treated with PMSF and E-64 showed 56.30 and 64.91% reductions in intestinal adult worms, which were evidently higher than the 26.42 and 31.85% reductions observed in the 1,10-Phe and pepstatin groups. The results indicated that serine proteases and cysteine proteases play major roles in T. spiralis IIL invasion, growth and survival, but other proteases (aspartic proteases and metalloproteases) also participate in larval invasion and development [17, 23, 66]. The results are similar to those of our previous studies. By using zymography combined with shotgun LC–MS/MS, a total of 30 T. spiralis proteins were identified in IIL ESPs, and they consisted principally of 19 serine proteases as well as 7 metalloproteases and 3 cysteine proteinases. qPCR confirmed that four proteases (two serine proteases, a cysteine protease and a metalloproteinase) were obviously highly expressed in the IIL stage compared to the ML stage [68]. However, in addition to the direct degradation of gut epithelial TJ proteins by the ESP proteases, the proteases might regulate TJ protein expression (downregulation or overexpression) through different signalling pathways and increase paracellular permeability [65], which needs to be investigated in future experiments. The proteases might act as signalling molecules by activating protease-activated receptor (PAR) family members (PAR 1–4). PAR 2 has been confirmed to be activated by a T. spiralis protease and is involved in the regulation of gut inflammation and permeability and ion transport [69]. The results of the animal challenge experiment suggested that serine proteases and cysteine proteases in ESPs also played vital roles in IIL larval invasion, growth and survival in the hosts and that these proteases might be regarded as the main candidate target molecules of vaccines against T. spiralis IIL invasion and development.

Additionally, the Caco-2 cell line does not have a mucus layer, and the influence of the mucus layer on IIL ESP-mediated hydrolysis of TJ proteins was not assessed in this study. Intestinal mucus is mainly derived from gut epithelial goblet cells. The mucus layer covers the surface of IECs and plays vital roles in the immune response against intestinal helminth infection and in preventing parasites from penetrating deep tissues such as the IEC monolayer, mucosa and the submucosal layer. The basic component of mucus is mucin, a glycoprotein secreted by goblet cells that aggregates to form a sticky and elastic gelatinous monolayer. A previous study revealed that the ESPs secreted by Trichuris muris changed the properties of the mucus barrier, making it more porous by degrading the mucin component of the mucus [18]. The results suggested that T. spiralis IIL ESPs might first degrade mucin within the mucus barrier and then pass through the porous mucus layer to disrupt the TJ proteins of the intestinal epithelium. The results of the present study showed that inhibitors of ESP enzymes impeded larval invasion of a cell monolayer, facilitated IIL expulsion from the gut and reduced intestinal adult worm burdens, suggesting that the inhibitors might also interrupt larval biological processes, thereby decreasing larval infectivity, development and survival in hosts [33]. A previous study revealed that 1,10-phenanthroline inhibited the egg production of Schistosoma mansoni adult worm pairs in vitro, achieving a 98% egg reduction at 50 µM. When worm pairs were exposed to the inhibitor, the males detached from the dish and released the females, resulting in unpaired worms, which suggested broad and important functions for metalloproteases in S. mansoni worms [70].

In conclusion, the results of this study showed that T. spiralis IIL ESPs destroyed gut epithelial integrity by degrading the TJ proteins occludin, claudin-1 and E-cad but also stimulated claudin-2 expression. The serine proteases and cysteine proteases in ESPs play vital roles in disrupting gut epithelial integrity and mediating IIL invasion, growth and survival in hosts, and aspartic proteases and metalloproteases also participate in larval invasion and development. The results suggest that serine proteases and cysteine proteases in T. spiralis IIL ESPs have the potential to be regarded as the main candidate target molecules of vaccines against larval invasion and development.

Abbreviations

AW:

adult worm

DAPI:

4′,6-Diamidino-2-phenylindole

DMSO:

dimethyl sulfoxide

dpi:

days post-infection

EDTA:

ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid

ESPs:

excretory/secretory proteins

FBS:

foetal bovine serum

Fib:

fibronectin

hpi:

hours post-infection

IEC:

intestinal epithelial cell

IIL:

intestinal infective larvae

MEM:

Modified Eagle’s Medium

ML:

muscle larvae

NBL:

newborn larvae

pepstatin:

pepstatin A

PI:

propidium iodide

PMSF:

phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride

PVDF:

polyvinylidene fluoride

RT:

room temperature

TBST:

Tris-buffered saline containing Tween

TJs:

tight junctions

1,10-Phe:

1,10-Phenanthrolin

References

  1. Liu RD, Wang ZQ, Wang L, Long SR, Ren HJ, Cui J (2013) Analysis of differentially expressed genes of Trichinella spiralis larvae activated by bile and cultured with intestinal epithelial cells using real-time PCR. Parasitol Res 112:4113–4120

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ren HJ, Cui J, Yang W, Liu RD, Wang ZQ (2013) Identification of differentially expressed genes of Trichinella spiralis larvae after exposure to host intestine milieu. PLoS ONE 8:e67570

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Despommier DD (1998) How does Trichinella spiralis make itself at home? Parasitol Today 14:318–323

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hu CX, Zeng J, Hao HN, Xu YXY, Liu F, Liu RD, Long SR, Wang ZQ, Cui J (2021) Biological properties and roles of a Trichinella spiralis inorganic pyrophosphatase in molting and developmental process of intestinal larval stages. Vet Res 52:6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Long SR, Wang ZQ, Jiang P, Liu RD, Qi X, Liu P, Ren HJ, Shi HN, Cui J (2015) Characterization and functional analysis of Trichinella spiralis Nudix hydrolase. Exp Parasitol 159:264–273

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lei JJ, Hu YY, Liu F, Yan SW, Liu RD, Long SR, Jiang P, Cui J, Wang ZQ (2020) Molecular cloning and characterization of a novel peptidase from Trichinella spiralis and protective immunity elicited by the peptidase in BALB/c mice. Vet Res 51:111

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Bai Y, Ma KN, Sun XY, Dan Liu R, Long SR, Jiang P, Wang ZQ, Cui J (2021) Molecular characterization of a novel cathepsin L from Trichinella spiralis and its participation in invasion, development and reproduction. Acta Trop 224:106112

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Romaris F, Appleton JA (2001) Invasion of epithelial cells by Trichinella spiralis: in vitro observations. Parasite 8:S48–S50

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Liu RD, Cui J, Liu XL, Jiang P, Sun GG, Zhang X, Long SR, Wang L, Wang ZQ (2015) Comparative proteomic analysis of surface proteins of Trichinella spiralis muscle larvae and intestinal infective larvae. Acta Trop 150:79–86

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang L, Cui J, Hu DD, Liu RD, Wang ZQ (2014) Identification of early diagnostic antigens from major excretory-secretory proteins of Trichinella spiralis muscle larvae using immunoproteomics. Parasite Vectors 7:40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Todorova VK, Knox DP, Kennedy MW (1995) Proteinases in the excretory/secretory products (ES) of adult Trichinella spiralis. Parasitology 111:201–208

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Yang DQ, Liu F, Bai Y, Zeng J, Hao HN, Yue X, Hu CX, Long SR, Liu RD, Wang ZQ, Cui J (2021) Functional characterization of a glutathione S-transferase in Trichinella spiralis invasion, development and reproduction. Vet Parasitol 297:109128

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang ZQ, Wang L, Cui J (2012) Proteomic analysis of Trichinella spiralis proteins in intestinal epithelial cells after culture with their larvae by shotgun LC-MS/MS approach. J Proteomics 75:2375–2383

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang L, Wang ZQ, Cui J (2013) Proteomic analysis of the changed proteins of Trichinella spiralis infective larvae after co-culture in vitro with intestinal epithelial cells. Vet Parasitol 194:160–163

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Yang Y, Wen Y, Cai YN, Vallee I, Boireau P, Liu MY, Cheng SP (2015) Serine proteases of parasitic helminths. Korean J Parasitol 53:1–11

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Grote A, Caffrey CR, Rebello KM, Smith D, Dalton JP, Lustigman S (2018) Cysteine proteases during larval migration and development of helminths in their final host. PLoS Neglect Trop Dis 12:e0005919

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hu YY, Zhang R, Yan SW, Yue WW, Zhang JH, Liu RD, Long SR, Cui J, Wang ZQ (2021) Characterization of a novel cysteine protease in Trichinella spiralis and its role in larval intrusion, development and fecundity. Vet Res 52:113

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Hasnain SZ, McGuckin MA, Grencis RK, Thornton DJ (2012) Serine protease(s) secreted by the nematode Trichuris muris degrade the mucus barrier. PLoS Neglect Trop Dis 6:e1856

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ortega-Pierres G, Arguello-Garcia R, Laredo-Cisneros MS, Fonseca-Linan R, Gomez-Mondragon M, Inzunza-Arroyo R, Flores-Benitez D, Raya-Sandino A, Chavez-Munguia B, Ventura-Gallegos JL, Zentella-Dehesa A, Bermudez-Cruz RM, Gonzalez-Mariscal L (2018) Giardipain-1, a protease secreted by Giardia duodenalis trophozoites, causes junctional, barrier and apoptotic damage in epithelial cell monolayers. Int J Parasitol 48:621–639

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Liu LN, Wang ZQ, Zhang X, Jiang P, Qi X, Liu RD, Zhang ZF, Cui J (2015) Characterization of Spirometra erinaceieuropaei plerocercoid cysteine protease and potential application for serodiagnosis of sparganosis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 9:e0003807

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Long Y, Cao BB, Yu L, Tukayo M, Feng CL, Wang YN, Luo DM (2015) Angiostrongylus cantonensis cathepsin B-like protease (Ac-cathB-1) is involved in host gut penetration. Parasite 22:37

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Wang SW, Cui J, Wang ZQ, Wang L (2010) In vitro effect of immune sera on the invasion of Trichinella spiralis infective larvae into intestinal epithelial cells and their development. Zhongguo Ji Sheng Chong Xue Yu Ji Sheng Chong Bing Za Zhi 28:348–352 ((in Chinese))

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Xu J, Liu RD, Bai SJ, Hao HN, Yue WW, Xu YXY, Long SR, Cui J, Wang ZQ (2020) Molecular characterization of a Trichinella spiralis aspartic protease and its facilitation role in larval invasion of host intestinal epithelial cells. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 14:e0008269

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Hu CX, Zeng J, Yang DQ, Yue X, Liu RD, Long SR, Zhang X, Jiang P, Cui J, Wang ZQ (2020) Binding of elastase-1 and enterocytes facilitates Trichinella spiralis larval intrusion of the host’s intestinal epithelium. Acta Trop 211:105592

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Jiang P, Wang ZQ, Cui J, Zhang X (2012) Comparison of artificial digestion and Baermann’s methods for detection of Trichinella spiralis pre-encapsulated larvae in muscles with low-level infections. Foodborne Pathog Dis 9:27–31

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Sun GG, Liu RD, Wang ZQ, Jiang P, Wang L, Liu XL, Liu CY, Zhang X, Cui J (2015) New diagnostic antigens for early trichinellosis: the excretory-secretory antigens of Trichinella spiralis intestinal infective larvae. Parasitol Res 114:4637–4644

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Liu RD, Jiang P, Wen H, Duan JY, Wang LA, Li JF, Liu CY, Sun GG, Wang ZQ, Cui J (2016) Screening and characterization of early diagnostic antigens in excretory-secretory proteins from Trichinella spiralis intestinal infective larvae by immunoproteomics. Parasitol Res 115:615–622

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Wu ZL, Nagano I, Takahashi Y, Maekawa Y (2016) Practical methods for collecting Trichinella parasites and their excretory-secretory products. Parasitol Int 65:591–595

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Liu J, Ma’ayeh S, Peirasmaki D, Lundstrom-Stadelmann B, Hellman L, Svard SG (2018) Secreted Giardia intestinalis cysteine proteases disrupt intestinal epithelial cell junctional complexes and degrade chemokines. Virulence 9:879–894

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Song YY, Zhang Y, Ren HN, Sun GG, Qi X, Yang F, Jiang P, Zhang X, Cui J, Wang ZQ (2018) Characterization of a serine protease inhibitor from Trichinella spiralis and its participation in larval invasion of host’s intestinal epithelial cells. Parasit Vectors 11:499

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Gagliardo LF, McVay CS, Appleton JA (2002) Molting, ecdysis, and reproduction of Trichinella spiralis are supported in vitro by intestinal epithelial cells. Infect Immun 70:1853–1859

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Cui J, Li LG, Jiang P, Liu RD, Yang X, Liu LN, Liu P, Zhang SB, Wang ZQ (2015) Biochemical and functional characterization of the glutathione S-transferase from Trichinella spiralis. Parasitol Res 114:2007–2013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Guo KX, Bai Y, Ren HN, Sun XY, Song YY, Liu RD, Long SR, Zhang X, Jiang P, Wang ZQ, Cui J (2020) Characterization of a Trichinella spiralis aminopeptidase and its participation in invasion, development and fecundity. Vet Res 51:78

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Cui J, Han Y, Yue X, Liu F, Song YY, Yan SW, Lei JJ, Zhang X, Jiang P, Wang ZQ (2019) Vaccination of mice with a recombinant novel cathepsin B inhibits Trichinella spiralis development, reduces the fecundity and worm burden. Parasit Vectors 12:581

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Xu J, Yang F, Yang DQ, Jiang P, Liu RD, Zhang X, Cui J, Wang ZQ (2018) Molecular characterization of Trichinella spiralis galectin and its participation in larval invasion of host’s intestinal epithelial cells. Vet Res 49:79

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Ren HN, Bai SJ, Wang Z, Han LL, Yan SW, Jiang P, Zhang X, Wang ZQ, Cui J (2021) A metalloproteinase Tsdpy31 from Trichinella spiralis participates in larval molting and development. Int J Biol Macromol 192:883–894

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Sun GG, Ren HN, Liu RD, Song YY, Qi X, Hu CX, Yang F, Jiang P, Zhang X, Wang ZQ, Cui J (2018) Molecular characterization of a putative serine protease from Trichinella spiralis and its elicited immune protection. Vet Res 49:59

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Cuellar P, Hernandez-Nava E, Garcia-Rivera G, Chavez-Munguia B, Schnoor M, Betanzos A, Orozco E (2017) Entamoeba histolytica EhCP112 dislocates and degrades claudin-1 and claudin-2 at tight junctions of the intestinal epithelium. Front Cell Infect Mi 7:372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Harrer A, Bucker R, Boehm M, Zarzecka U, Tegtmeyer N, Sticht H, Schulzke JD, Backert S (2019) Campylobacter jejuni enters gut epithelial cells and impairs intestinal barrier function through cleavage of occludin by serine protease HtrA. Gut Pathog 11:4

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Yue X, Sun XY, Liu F, Hu CX, Bai Y, Da Yang Q, Liu RD, Zhang X, Cui J, Wang ZQ (2020) Molecular characterization of a Trichinella spiralis serine proteinase. Vet Res 51:125

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Yan SW, Hu YY, Song YY, Ren HN, Shen JM, Liu RD, Long SR, Jiang P, Cui J, Wang ZQ (2021) Characterization of a Trichinella spiralis cathepsin X and its promotion for the larval invasion of mouse intestinal epithelial cells. Vet Parasitol 297:109160

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Betanzos A, Zanatta D, Banuelos C, Hernandez-Nava E, Cuellar P, Orozco E (2018) Epithelial cells expressing EhADH, an Entamoeba histolytica adhesin, exhibit increased tight junction proteins. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 8:340

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Cui J, Ren HJ, Liu RD, Wang L, Zhang ZF, Wang ZQ (2013) Phage-displayed specific polypeptide antigens induce significant protective immunity against Trichinella spiralis infection in BALB/c mice. Vaccine 31:1171–1177

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Ren HN, Guo KX, Zhang Y, Sun GG, Liu RD, Jiang P, Zhang X, Wang L, Cui J, Wang ZQ (2018) Molecular characterization of a 31 kDa protein from Trichinella spiralis and its induced immune protection in BALB/c mice. Parasit Vectors 11:625

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Yang F, Yang DQ, Song YY, Guo KX, Li YL, Long SR, Jiang P, Cui J, Wang ZQ (2019) In vitro silencing of a serine protease inhibitor suppresses Trichinella spiralis invasion, development, and fecundity. Parasitol Res 118:2247–2255

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Long SR, Wang ZQ, Liu RD, Liu LN, Li LG, Jiang P, Zhang X, Zhang ZF, Shi HN, Cui J (2014) Molecular identification of Trichinella spiralis nudix hydrolase and its induced protective immunity against trichinellosis in BALB/c mice. Parasite Vectors 7:600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Liu CY, Ren HN, Song YY, Sun GG, Liu RD, Jiang P, Long SR, Zhang X, Wang ZQ, Cui J (2018) Characterization of a putative glutathione S-transferase of the parasitic nematode Trichinella spiralis. Exp Parasitol 187:59–66

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Sun GG, Song YY, Jiang P, Ren HN, Yan SW, Han Y, Liu RD, Zhang X, Wang ZQ, Cui J (2018) Characterization of a Trichinella spiralis putative serine protease. Study of its potential as sero-diagnostic tool. PLoS Neglect Trop Dis 12:e0006485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Ma’ayeh SY, Liu JY, Peirasmaki D, Hornaeus K, Mlind SB, Grabherr M, Bergquist J, Svard SG, (2017) Characterization of the Giardia intestinalis secretome during interaction with human intestinal epithelial cells: the impact on host cells. PLoS Neglect Trop Dis 11:e0006120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Hu CX, Xu YXY, Hao HN, Liu RD, Jiang P, Long SR, Wang ZQ, Cui J (2021) Oral vaccination with recombinant Lactobacillus plantarum encoding Trichinella spiralis inorganic pyrophosphatase elicited a protective immunity in BALB/c mice. PLoS Neglect Trop Dis 15:e0009865

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Liu XL, Ren HN, Shi YL, Hu CX, Song YY, Duan JY, Zhang HP, Du XR, Liu RD, Jiang P, Wang ZQ, Cui J (2017) Early detection of Trichinella spiralis DNA in the feces of experimentally infected mice by using PCR. Acta Trop 166:351–355

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Zeng J, Zhang XZ, Zhang R, Yan SW, Song YY, Long SR, Dan Liu R, Wang ZQ, Cui J (2021) Vaccination of mice with recombinant novel aminopeptidase P and cathepsin X alone or in combination induces protective immunity against Trichinella spiralis infection. Acta Trop 224:106125

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Canny GO, McCormick BA (2008) Bacteria in the intestine, helpful residents or enemies from within? Infect Immun 76:3360–3373

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Odenwald MA, Turner JR (2017) The intestinal epithelial barrier: a therapeutic target? Nat Rev Gastro Hepat 14:9–21

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Betanzos A, Javier-Reyna R, Garcia-Rivera G, Banuelos C, Gonzalez-Mariscal L, Schnoor M, Orozco E (2013) The EhCPADH112 complex of Entamoeba histolytica interacts with tight junction proteins occludin and claudin-1 to produce epithelial damage. PLoS ONE 8:e65100

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. McDermott JR, Bartram RE, Knight PA, Miller HRP, Garrod DR, Grencis RK (2003) Mast cells disrupt epithelial barrier function during enteric nematode infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:7761–7766

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Fernandez-Blanco JA, Estevez J, Shea-Donohue T, Martinez V, Vergara P (2015) Changes in epithelial barrier function in response to parasitic infection: implications for IBD pathogenesis. J Crohns Colitis 9:463–476

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Biancheri P, Di Sabatino A, Corazza GR, MacDonald TT (2013) Proteases and the gut barrier. Cell Tissue Res 351:269–280

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Bien J, Cabaj W, Moskwa B (2015) Proteomic analysis of potential immunoreactive proteins from muscle larvae and adult worms of Trichinella spiralis in experimentally infected pigs. Folia Parasitol (Praha) 62(2015):022

    Google Scholar 

  60. Bolas-Fernandez F, Corral Bezara LD (2006) TSL-1 antigens of Trichinella: an overview of their potential role in parasite invasion, survival and serodiagnosis of trichinellosis. Res Vet Sci 81:297–303

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Wang B, Wang ZQ, Jin J, Ren HJ, Liu LN, Cui J (2013) Cloning, expression and characterization of a Trichinella spiralis serine protease gene encoding a 35.5 kDa protein. Exp Parasitol 134:148–154

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Xu J, Liu RD, Long SR, Song YY, Jiang P, Zhang X, Cui J, Wang ZQ (2020) Characterization of a chymotrypsin-like enzyme from Trichinella spiralis and its facilitation of larva penetration into the host’s enteral epithelial cells. Res Vet Sci 128:1–8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Yang DQ, Zeng Y, Sun XY, Yue X, Hu CX, Jiang P, Liu RD, Ciu J, Wang ZQ (2020) Trichinella spiralis: RNAi-mediated silencing of serine protease results in reduction of intrusion, development and fecundity. Trop Biomed 37:932–946

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Li YL, Wang BY, Zhu YX, Tian ZH, Yang Z, Duan JQ, Wang ZQ (2020) The cysteine protease ATG4B of Trichinella spiralis promotes larval invasion into the intestine of the host. Vet Res 51:69

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Li CY, Bai X, Liu XL, Zhang YY, Liu L, Zhang LX, Xu FY, Yang Y, Liu MY (2021) Disruption of epithelial barrier of Caco-2 cell monolayers by excretory secretory products of Trichinella spiralis might be related to serine protease. Front Microbiol 12:634185

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Han Y, Yue X, Hu CX, Liu F, Liu RD, He MM, Long SR, Cui J, Wang ZQ (2020) Interaction of a Trichinella spiralis cathepsin B with enterocytes promotes the larval intrusion into the cells. Res Vet Sci 130:110–117

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Theocharis AD, Skandalis SS, Gialeli C, Karamanos NK (2016) Extracellular matrix structure. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 97:4–27

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Ren HN, Zhuo TX, Bai SJ, Bai Y, Sun XY, Liu RD, Long SR, Cui J, Wang ZQ (2021) Proteomic analysis of hydrolytic proteases in excretory/secretory proteins from Trichinella spiralis intestinal infective larvae using zymography combined with shotgun LC-MS/MS approach. Acta Trop 216:105825

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Fernandez-Blanco JA, Hollenberg MD, Martinez V, Vergara P (2013) PAR-2-mediated control of barrier function and motility differs between early and late phases of postinfectious gut dysfunction in the rat. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 304:G390-400

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Day TA, Chen GZ (1998) The metalloprotease inhibitor 1,10-phenanthroline affects Schistosoma mansoni motor activity, egg laying and viability. Parasitology 116:319–325

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Ms. KN Ma for helping with the experimental techniques in this study.

Funding

This study was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82172300 and 81971952). The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Parasitology, Medical College, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450052, China

    Yan Yan Song, Qi Qi Lu, Lu Lu Han, Shu Wei Yan, Xin Zhuo Zhang, Ruo Dan Liu, Shao Rong Long, Jing Cui & Zhong Quan Wang

Authors
  1. Yan Yan Song
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Qi Qi Lu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Lu Lu Han
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Shu Wei Yan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Xin Zhuo Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ruo Dan Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Shao Rong Long
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Jing Cui
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Zhong Quan Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization: JC, ZQW. Data analysis: YYS. Funding acquisition: JC, ZQW. Investigation: YYS, QQL, LLH, SWY, XZZ, RDL, SRL, JC, ZQW. Methodology: JC, ZQW. Project administration: JC, ZQW. Resources: JC, ZQW. Supervision: JC, ZQW. Writing—original draft: YYS, JC, ZQW. Writing—review and editing: YYS, JC, ZQW. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jing Cui or Zhong Quan Wang.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval was acquired from the Institutional Life Science Ethics Committee of Zhengzhou University (No. SCXK 2017-0001). The experimental animals were raised and cared for according to the National Guidelines for Experimental Animal Welfare of the People’s Republic of China (2006).

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Song, Y.Y., Lu, Q.Q., Han, L.L. et al. Proteases secreted by Trichinella spiralis intestinal infective larvae damage the junctions of the intestinal epithelial cell monolayer and mediate larval invasion. Vet Res 53, 19 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13567-022-01032-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13567-022-01032-1

Keywords

Veterinary Research

ISSN: 1297-9716