高级检索
钟韵, 袁红, 钟朝晖, 潘建平, 李群英, 钟引. 中国西部两省市农村小学生忽视现状调查[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2015, 31(6): 713-716. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2015-31-06-06
引用本文: 钟韵, 袁红, 钟朝晖, 潘建平, 李群英, 钟引. 中国西部两省市农村小学生忽视现状调查[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2015, 31(6): 713-716. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2015-31-06-06
ZHONG Yun, YUAN Hong, ZHONG Zhao-hui.et al, . Child neglect among rural primary school students in two regions of western China[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2015, 31(6): 713-716. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2015-31-06-06
Citation: ZHONG Yun, YUAN Hong, ZHONG Zhao-hui.et al, . Child neglect among rural primary school students in two regions of western China[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2015, 31(6): 713-716. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2015-31-06-06

中国西部两省市农村小学生忽视现状调查

Child neglect among rural primary school students in two regions of western China

  • 摘要: 目的 了解中国西部两省市(重庆市和陕西省)农村小学生忽视状况, 为制定该人群健康促进策略与措施提供科学依据。方法 根据多阶段分层整群抽样原则, 从重庆市和陕西省共抽取1 874名农村小学生, 采用中国农村儿童忽视评价常模规定的量表和评价方法进行调查和评价。结果 重庆市和陕西省农村小学生总忽视率为53.2%, 忽视度为(47.56±9.90), 男、女生忽视率和忽视度差异无统计学意义;除社会层面的忽视率、忽视度和教育层面的忽视度外, 9~11岁儿童其他层面忽视率和忽视度均高于6~8岁儿童, 且差异有统计学意义;非独生子女、独生子女的忽视率分别为58.7%、39.1%, 忽视度分别为(48.57±9.80)、(45.21±9.75), 差异均有统计学意义;除社会层面的忽视率, 三代同堂和核心家庭的忽视率和忽视度均低于单亲家庭和再婚家庭, 留守儿童均高于非留守儿童, 且差异均有统计学意义。重庆市农村儿童的忽视率(66.4%)和忽视度(50.53±9.80)均明显高于陕西省农村儿童的忽视率(38.8%)和忽视度(44.87±9.20)。结论 重庆市和陕西省农村小学生忽视状况较严重, 应高度重视小学生忽视问题, 家庭、学校、政府和社会应合力打造良好的成长环境, 促进儿童身心健康发展。

     

    Abstract: Objective To examine neglect status among rural primary school students in Chongqing municipality and Shaanxi province of western China and to provide a basis for health promotion in the students.Methods Using multistage stratified cluster sampling, a total of 1 874 primary school students at the age of 6-11 years were selected from rural areas of Chongqing municipality and Shaanxi province for the survey.Scales and evaluation methods in the Chinese Rural Children Neglect Survey were adopted in this Study.Results The overall neglect rate and overall neglect degree were 53.2% and 47.56±9.90 among the pupils.No significant difference was found in the prevalence of neglect between the boys and girls.The neglect rate and degree of all domains among the pupils aged 9-11 years were significantly higher than those of the pupils aged 6-8 years except for the degree of social and educational neglect.The neglect rates were 58.7% and 39.1% and the neglect degrees were 48.57±9.80 and 45.21±9.75 among the only child and non-only child pupils, with significant differences between the two groups.The neglect rate and degree of all domains among the pupils from the family of three generations under one roof and nuclear family were significantly lower than those among the pupils from single-parent family and remarried family except for social neglect rate.The neglect rate and degree among left-behind children were higher than those among non-left-behind children.The neglect rate and degree were significantly higher among the rural pupils in Chongqing municipality than those in Shaanxi province(66.4% vs.38.8% and 50.53±9.80 vs.44.87±9.20).Conclusion The neglect status in rural primary school students in Chongqing municipality and Shaanxi province is serious and more attentions should be paid to this situation.

     

/

返回文章
返回