高级检索
李新建, 姜垣, 李强, 徐继英, 姚海宏, 焦淑芳, 赵建华, 朱国平, 罗不凡, 李恂. 烟盒健康警语对6个城市吸烟者警示效果分析[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2009, 25(10): 1193-1195. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2009-25-10-22
引用本文: 李新建, 姜垣, 李强, 徐继英, 姚海宏, 焦淑芳, 赵建华, 朱国平, 罗不凡, 李恂. 烟盒健康警语对6个城市吸烟者警示效果分析[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2009, 25(10): 1193-1195. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2009-25-10-22
LI Xin-jian, JIANG Yuan, LI Qiang, . Warning effects of health labeling on cigarette packet on smokers in six cities[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2009, 25(10): 1193-1195. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2009-25-10-22
Citation: LI Xin-jian, JIANG Yuan, LI Qiang, . Warning effects of health labeling on cigarette packet on smokers in six cities[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2009, 25(10): 1193-1195. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2009-25-10-22

烟盒健康警语对6个城市吸烟者警示效果分析

Warning effects of health labeling on cigarette packet on smokers in six cities

  • 摘要: 目的了解现行的烟盒包装健康警语对北京、沈阳、上海、长沙、广州、银川等6个城市吸烟者的警示效应。方法采用多阶段抽样方法,在6个城市抽取4815名成年吸烟者进行入户调查,测量健康警语对其的警示效应,采用多因素Logistic回归分析健康警语对吸烟者警示作用的影响因素。结果6个城市调查对象中男性占94.9%。警示效应平均得分为1.38分(≥2分为有警示作用);过去1个月经常因健康警语而没有吸烟的比例为2.15%;只有13.31%的吸烟者会在吸烟时回避健康警语;因健康警语而经常考虑吸烟对健康危害的比例为8.26%,因烟盒上的健康警语很想戒烟的比例为5.29%。多因素分析提示,不同城市和吸烟时间长短是警语对吸烟者警示效应的影响因素。结论现行的烟盒健康警语已经失去应有的警示效应。6城市中大部分吸烟者不会回避烟盒上的健康警语或因健康警语而停止吸烟。也不会因警语而经常考虑吸烟危害或很想戒烟。

     

    Abstract: ObjectiveTo examine the effects of health warning on cigarette package on smokers in Beijing,Shenyang,Shanghai, Changsha,Guangzhou,and Yinchuan.MethodsMultistage sampling was used to select 4815 smokers in six cities.Face to face interview was conducted to colledtrelated information.Multivariate logistic regression models were used to explore factors associated with warning effects.ResultsAmong the participants,94.9% was male.Average score of warning effects was 1.38(effective score≥2).Only 2.15% of respondents often stop smoking because of warning labels, and 13.31% avoided warnings during the past one month.The proportion of considering the harm of smoking and planning to quit smoking because of noticing the warning label were only 8.26% and 5.29%,respectively.Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that different cities and smoking years were associated with warning effects of health labels on cigarette package.ConclusionCurrent health warning on cigarette package had no designed warning effects for smokers.It is necessary to renew the form of the warnings.

     

/

返回文章
返回