Skip to main content
Log in

Development of Interactive Software for Bayesian Optimal Phase 1 Clinical Trial Design

  • Statistics
  • Published:
Drug information journal : DIJ / Drug Information Association Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Perevozskaya I. Constrained Bayesian Optimal Designs for Phase / Clinical Trials. Baltimore: University of Maryland; 2001 (doctoral dissertation).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Haines LM, Perevozskaya I, Rosenbergcr WF. Bayesian optimal designs for phase I clinical trials. Biometrics. 2003;59:591–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Rosenberger WF. Haines LM. Competing designs for phase I clinical trials: a review. Stat Med. 2002;21:2757–2770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Atkinson AC. Donev AN. Optimum Experimental Designs. Oxford, United Kingdom: Clarendon: 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Clyde M, Chaloner K. The equivalence of constrained and weighted designs in multiple objective problems. J Am Stat Assoc. 1996;91:1236–1244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Babb J, Rogalko A, Zacks S. Cancer phase I clinical trials: efficient dose escalation with overdose control. Stat Mad. 1994;17:1103–1120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Whitehead J. Brunier H. Bayesian decision procedures for dose determining experiments. Stat Med. 1995;14:885–893.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Whitehead J. Williamson D. Bayesian decision procedures based on logistic regression models for dose-finding studies. Stat Med. 1998;8:445–467.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Pukelsheim F. Optimal Design of Experiments. New York: Wiley; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Flournoy N. A clinical experiment in bone marrow transplantation: estimating a percentage point of a quantal response curve. In Case Studies in Bayesian Statistics. Gatsonis C, Hodges JS, Kass RE, Singpurwalla ND, eds. New York: Springer; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tsutakawa RK, Bayesian inference for bioassay. Technical Report 52. Columbia, MO: University of Missouri; 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Whitehead J, Zhou Y, Patterson S, Webber D, Francis S. Easy-to-implement Bayesian methods for dose-escalation studies in healthy volunteers. Biostatistics. 2001;2:47–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. McLeish DL, Tosh D. Sequential designs in bioassay. Biometrics. 1990;46:103–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Silvapulle M. On the existence of maximum likelihood estimators for the binomial response models. J Roy Stat Soc. B. 1981;43:310–313.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William F. Rosenberger PhD.

Additional information

Grant support: Rosenberger, Canfield, and Hausner were supported by grant RO1-CA 87746 from the National Cancer Institute. Haines was supported by the University of Natal and the National Research foundation of South Africa.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rosenberger, W.F., Canfield, G.C., Perevozskaya, I. et al. Development of Interactive Software for Bayesian Optimal Phase 1 Clinical Trial Design. Ther Innov Regul Sci 39, 89–98 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1177/009286150503900112

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/009286150503900112

Key Words

Navigation