Skip to main content
Log in

Attitudes of Older Americans toward Direct-to-Consumer Advertising: Predictors of Impact

  • Drug Information
  • Published:
Drug information journal : DIJ / Drug Information Association Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To assess the attitudes of Americans over age 60 concerning direct-to-consumer (DTC) advertising of prescription drugs and to determine if gender, race, income, or level of education has an impact on the attitudes of the elderly toward DTC advertising.

Design

A seven-page survey, constructed using the 1992 National Health Interview Survey as a model, was used to assess the attitudes of elderly individuals toward DTC advertising of prescription drugs. Subjects were interviewed by one of four investigators. The face-to-face interview took about 15 minute to complete.

Participants

Two hundred sixty-three subjects over age 60 were recruited from the greater Kansas City metropolitan area for participation in the survey.

Measurements

Responses to survey queries were limited to “true,” “false,” or “don’t know.” Demographic data were collected prior to the start of the survey. Data collected using the instrument were prospectively stratified based upon age, race, gender, estimated total household income, and level of education, and analyzed for statistical significance using Chi-squared and Fisher’s exact methods.

Results

Participants included 185 women and 79 men, with a mean age of 75.5 years. Approximately 50% were African American and approximately 50% were Caucasian. The vast majority (88%) of those interviewed reported having seen ads for prescription drugs on television. Fifty-three percent of participants agreed that DTC advertising of prescription medications was a good idea; however, 60% stated that ads were often confusing and difficult to understand. Subjects who were not high school graduates were less likely to have seen ads on television and to have read ads in magazines. They were, however, more likely to talk with their physician about taking advertised medications. Furthermore, they were less certain for whom the medication was intended or what it was used to treat. Only 38% of those interviewed felt sufficient information was disclosed about side effects. Conclusion: Nearly all Americans over age 60 in our survey were aware of DTC prescription drug advertisements. While half of the older Americans believed DTC advertising was a good idea, they had reservations about the information provided in the ads.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hollon MF. Direct-to-consumer marketing of prescription drugs: creating consumer demand. JAMA. 1999;281:382–584.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bell RA, Kravitz RL, Wilkes MS. Direct-to-consumer prescription drug advertising, 1989–1998. J Fam Pract. 2000;49:329–335.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Pinto MB. On the nature and properties of appeals used in direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription drugs. Psychol Rep. 2000;86: 597–607.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Baylor-Henry M, Drezin NA. Regulation of prescription drug promotion: direct-to-consumer advertising, Clin Ther 1998;20(Suppl C):C86–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hayes TA. The Food and Drug Administration’s regulation of drug labeling, advertising, and promotion: Looking back and looking ahead. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1998;63:607–616.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Pines WL. Direct-to-consumer advertising. Ann Pharmacother. 2000;34:1341–1344.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. National Institute for Health Care Management. Prescription drugs and mass media advertising. September 2000. Available at www.nihcm.org/DTCbrief2001.pdf. Accessed May 21, 2001.

  8. Williams JR, Hensel PJ. Direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription drugs. J Health Care Market. 1995;15:35–41.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Benson V, Marano MA. Current estimates from the National Health Interview Survey. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Stat. 10(189) 194:1994.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wolfe SM. Direct-to-consumer advertising—education or emotion promotion [editorial]? N Engl J Med. 2002; 346:524–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Holmer AF. Direct-to-consumer advertising—strengthening our health care system [editorial]. N Engl J Med. 2002; 346:526–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. American College of Physicians-American Society of Internal Medicine. Governmental affairs and public policy: Direct to consumer advertising for prescription drugs. October 9, 1998. Available at http://www.acponline.org/hpp/pospaper/dtcads.htm. Accessed May 27, 2001.

  13. Food and Drug Administration Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. Attitudinal and behavioral effects of direct-to-consumer (DTC) promotion of prescription drugs. Spring 1999. Available at http://www.fda.gov/cder/ddmac/dtcindex.htm. Accessed May 7, 2001.

  14. Anon. International Survey on Wellness and Consumer Reactions to DTC Advertising of Rx Drugs. Emmaus, Pa: Rodale; 1999.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jacqueline S. Marinac PharmD, BCPS.

Additional information

This study was approved and funded by the University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, Department of Medicine.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Marinac, J.S., Godfrey, L.A., Buchinger, C. et al. Attitudes of Older Americans toward Direct-to-Consumer Advertising: Predictors of Impact. Ther Innov Regul Sci 38, 301–311 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1177/009286150403800310

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/009286150403800310

Key Words

Navigation