Skip to main content
Log in

Relationships in business markets: Exchange episodes, value creation, and their empirical assessment

  • Special Issue On Relationship Marketing
  • Published:
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Conclusion

David Wilson (1995) has provided us with much grist for thought with his integrated framework for customer-supplier relationship development. In focusing on which constructs are “active” and therefore most meaningful at each stage, he has opened a new vista for research in this area. Our models and empirical research ought to reflect this, but to date they largely have not. I have suggested qualitative, longitudinal research as a preferred next step in gaining the knowledge that we will need to make field-survey, longitudinal research worthwhile.

Wilson also is to be lauded for drawing greater attention to value creation as a central undertaking in customer-supplier relationships. Understanding and actualizing value creation (and value sharing) are critical aspects of the market-sensing and customer-linking capabilities in market-driven organizations (Day 1994), yet the mechanisms underlying them and the methodologies for accurately assessing them remain largely unknown. Here, particularly for tool development research, it would seem to be an opportune time for business marketing academics and practitioners to form their own collaborative relationships for mutual gain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, James C. and James A. Narus. 1984. “Power Antecedents in Channel Relationships: Equity and Social Exchange Perspectives.” InProceedings of the Division of Consumer Psychology. Ed. James C. Anderson. San Antonio, TX: Division of Consumer Psychology, American Psychological Association, 77–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————— and —————. 1991. “Partnering as a Focused Market Strategy.”California Management Review 33 (Spring): 95–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————— and —————. 1995. “Capturing the Value of Supplementary Services.”Harvard Business Review 73 (January–February): 75–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, James C., Dipak C. Jain, and Pradeep Chintagunta. 1993. “Customer Value Assessment in Business Markets: A State-of-Practice Study.”Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing 1 (Spring): 3–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, James C., Håkan Håkansson, and Jan Johanson. 1994. “Dyadic Business Relationships Within a Business Network Context.”Journal of Marketing 58 (October): 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borys, Bryan and David B. Jemison. 1989. “Hybrid Arrangements as Strategic Alliances: Theoretical Issues in Organizational Combinations.”Academy of Management Review 14 (April): 234–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day, George S. 1994. “The Capabilities of Market-Driven Organizations.”Journal of Marketing 58 (October): 37–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • “Dreamware.” 1993.The Economist February 13, pp. 68–9.

  • Dwyer, F. Robert, Paul H. Schurr, and Sejo Oh. 1987. “Developing Buyer-Seller Relationships.”Journal of Marketing 51 (April): 11–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamel, Gary and C. K. Prahalad. 1993. “Strategy as Stretch and Leverage.”Harvard Business Review 71 (March–April): 75–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————— and —————. 1994. “Competing for the Future.”Harvard Business Review 72 (July–August): 122–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalwani, Manohar U. and Narakesari Narayandas. 1995. “Long-term Manufacturer-Supplier Relationships: Do They Pay Off for Supplier Firms?”Journal of Marketing 59 (January): 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard-Barton, Dorthy. 1990. “A Dual Methodology for Case Studies: Synergistic Use of a Longitudinal Single Site with Replicated Multiple Sites.”Organization Science 1 (August): 248–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ring, Peter Smith and Andrew H. Van de Ven. 1994. “Developmental Processes of Cooperative Interorganizational Relationships.”Academy of Management Review 19 (January): 90–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schank, Roger C. and Robert P. Abelson. 1977.Scripts, Plans, Goals and Understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thibaut, John W. and Harold H. Kelley. 1959.The Social Psychology of Groups. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesan, Ravi. 1992. “Strategic Sourcing: To Make or Not to Make.”Harvard Business Review 70 (November–December): 98–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘Why Networks May Fail.” 1992.The Economist October 10, p. 83.

  • Wilson, David T. 1995. “An Integrated Model of Buyer-Seller Relationships.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 23 (4): 335–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zajac, Edward J. and Cyrus P. Olsen. 1993. “From Transaction Cost to Transactional Value Analysis: Implications for the Study of Interorganizational Strategies.”Journal of Management Studies 30 (January): 131–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

His research interests are in working relationships between firms in business markets and measurement techniques. His articles have appeared inHarvard Business Review, Journal of Marketing, Journal of Marketing Research, Management Science, Psychological Bulletin, andPsychometrika, among others. He has been vice president of the Business Marketing Division of the American Marketing Association and is a fellow of the American Psychological Association.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Anderson, J.C. Relationships in business markets: Exchange episodes, value creation, and their empirical assessment. JAMS 23, 346–350 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1177/009207039502300415

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/009207039502300415

Keywords

Navigation