Conclusion
David Wilson (1995) has provided us with much grist for thought with his integrated framework for customer-supplier relationship development. In focusing on which constructs are “active” and therefore most meaningful at each stage, he has opened a new vista for research in this area. Our models and empirical research ought to reflect this, but to date they largely have not. I have suggested qualitative, longitudinal research as a preferred next step in gaining the knowledge that we will need to make field-survey, longitudinal research worthwhile.
Wilson also is to be lauded for drawing greater attention to value creation as a central undertaking in customer-supplier relationships. Understanding and actualizing value creation (and value sharing) are critical aspects of the market-sensing and customer-linking capabilities in market-driven organizations (Day 1994), yet the mechanisms underlying them and the methodologies for accurately assessing them remain largely unknown. Here, particularly for tool development research, it would seem to be an opportune time for business marketing academics and practitioners to form their own collaborative relationships for mutual gain.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, James C. and James A. Narus. 1984. “Power Antecedents in Channel Relationships: Equity and Social Exchange Perspectives.” InProceedings of the Division of Consumer Psychology. Ed. James C. Anderson. San Antonio, TX: Division of Consumer Psychology, American Psychological Association, 77–81.
————— and —————. 1991. “Partnering as a Focused Market Strategy.”California Management Review 33 (Spring): 95–113.
————— and —————. 1995. “Capturing the Value of Supplementary Services.”Harvard Business Review 73 (January–February): 75–83.
Anderson, James C., Dipak C. Jain, and Pradeep Chintagunta. 1993. “Customer Value Assessment in Business Markets: A State-of-Practice Study.”Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing 1 (Spring): 3–29.
Anderson, James C., Håkan Håkansson, and Jan Johanson. 1994. “Dyadic Business Relationships Within a Business Network Context.”Journal of Marketing 58 (October): 1–15.
Borys, Bryan and David B. Jemison. 1989. “Hybrid Arrangements as Strategic Alliances: Theoretical Issues in Organizational Combinations.”Academy of Management Review 14 (April): 234–49.
Day, George S. 1994. “The Capabilities of Market-Driven Organizations.”Journal of Marketing 58 (October): 37–52.
“Dreamware.” 1993.The Economist February 13, pp. 68–9.
Dwyer, F. Robert, Paul H. Schurr, and Sejo Oh. 1987. “Developing Buyer-Seller Relationships.”Journal of Marketing 51 (April): 11–27.
Hamel, Gary and C. K. Prahalad. 1993. “Strategy as Stretch and Leverage.”Harvard Business Review 71 (March–April): 75–84.
————— and —————. 1994. “Competing for the Future.”Harvard Business Review 72 (July–August): 122–8.
Kalwani, Manohar U. and Narakesari Narayandas. 1995. “Long-term Manufacturer-Supplier Relationships: Do They Pay Off for Supplier Firms?”Journal of Marketing 59 (January): 1–16.
Leonard-Barton, Dorthy. 1990. “A Dual Methodology for Case Studies: Synergistic Use of a Longitudinal Single Site with Replicated Multiple Sites.”Organization Science 1 (August): 248–66.
Ring, Peter Smith and Andrew H. Van de Ven. 1994. “Developmental Processes of Cooperative Interorganizational Relationships.”Academy of Management Review 19 (January): 90–118.
Schank, Roger C. and Robert P. Abelson. 1977.Scripts, Plans, Goals and Understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Thibaut, John W. and Harold H. Kelley. 1959.The Social Psychology of Groups. New York: Wiley.
Venkatesan, Ravi. 1992. “Strategic Sourcing: To Make or Not to Make.”Harvard Business Review 70 (November–December): 98–107.
‘Why Networks May Fail.” 1992.The Economist October 10, p. 83.
Wilson, David T. 1995. “An Integrated Model of Buyer-Seller Relationships.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 23 (4): 335–345.
Zajac, Edward J. and Cyrus P. Olsen. 1993. “From Transaction Cost to Transactional Value Analysis: Implications for the Study of Interorganizational Strategies.”Journal of Management Studies 30 (January): 131–45.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
His research interests are in working relationships between firms in business markets and measurement techniques. His articles have appeared inHarvard Business Review, Journal of Marketing, Journal of Marketing Research, Management Science, Psychological Bulletin, andPsychometrika, among others. He has been vice president of the Business Marketing Division of the American Marketing Association and is a fellow of the American Psychological Association.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Anderson, J.C. Relationships in business markets: Exchange episodes, value creation, and their empirical assessment. JAMS 23, 346–350 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1177/009207039502300415
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/009207039502300415