Skip to main content
Log in

Building corporate associations: Consumer attributions for corporate socially responsible programs

Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Corporate social responsibility (CSR) is often used as a key criterion in gauging corporate reputation. This research examined the influence of consumers’ attributions on corporate outcomes in response to CSR. Researchers and managers have considered consumers’ beliefs about CSR initiatives to be simplistic, serving either economic ends or reflecting sincere social concerns. The results of two studies established that consumers’ attributions were more complex than traditionally viewed, mirroring many of the motives ascribed to companies by managers and researchers. Rather than viewing corporate efforts along a self- or other-centered continuum, consumers differentiated four types of motives: self-centered motives that are strategic and egoistic and other-centered motives that are values driven and stakeholder driven. Consumers responded most positively to CSR efforts they judged as values driven and strategic while responding negatively to efforts perceived as stakeholder driven or egoistic. Attributions were shown to affect purchase intent as well as mediate the structure of an offer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aaker, David A. 2005.Strategic Market Management (7th ed.). New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albert, Stuart and David A. Whetten. 1985. “Organizational Identity.” InResearch in Organizational Behavior. Eds. L. L. Cummings and B. M. Straw. Greenwich, CT: JAI, 263–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, Reuben M. and David A. Kenny. 1986. “The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51 (6): 1173–1182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barone, Michael J., Anthony D. Miyazaki, and Kimberly A. Taylor. 2000. “The Influence of Cause-Related Marketing on Consumer Choice: Does One Good Turn Deserve Another?”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 28 (2): 248–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker-Olsen, Karen L., B. Andrew Cudmore, and Ronald Paul Hill. 2006. “The Impact of Perceived Corporate Social Responsibility on Consumer Behavior.”Journal of Business Research 59 (1): 46–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Tom J. and Peter A. Dacin. 1997. “The Company and the Product: Corporate Associations and Consumer Product Responses.”Journal of Marketing 61 (January): 68–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —,—, Michael G. Pratt, and David A. Whetten. 2006. “Identity, Intended Image, Construed Image, and Reputation: An Interdisciplinary Framework and Suggested Terminology.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 34(2): 99–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cone, Carol L., Mark A. Feldman, and Alison T. DaSilva. 2003. “Causes and Effects.”Harvard Business Review 81 (July): 95–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drumwright, Minette E. 1996. “Company Advertising With a Social Dimension: The Role of Noneconomic Criteria.”Journal of Marketing 60 (October): 71–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer, F. Robert, Paul H. Schurr, and Sejo Oh. 1987. “Developing Buyer-Seller Relationships.”Journal of Marketing 51 (April): 11–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellen, Pam Scholder, Lois A. Mohr, and Deborah J. Webb. 2000. “Charitable Programs and the Retailer: Do They Mix?”Journal of Retailing 76 (3): 393–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fein, Steven. 1996. “Effects of Suspicion on Attributional Thinking and the Correspondence Bias.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 70 (6): 1164–1184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forehand, Mark R. and Sonya Grier. 2003. “When Is Honesty the Best Policy? The Effect of Stated Company Intent on Consumer Skepticism.”Journal of Consumer Psychology 13 (3): 349–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Gallup Poll Monthly. 1996. 364 (January): 34–35.

  • Gilbert, Daniel T. and Patrick S. Malone. 1995. “The Correspondence Bias.”Psychological Bulletin 117 (1): 21–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurhan-Canli, Zeynep and Rajeev Batra. 2004. “When Corporate Image Affects Product Evaluations: The Moderating Role of Perceived Risks.”Journal of Marketing Research 41 (May): 197–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Handelman, Jay M. and Stephen J. Arnold. 1999. “The Role of Marketing Actions With a Social Dimension: Appeals to the Institutional Environment.”Journal of Marketing 63 (July): 33–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilton, James L., Steven Fein, and Dale T. Miller. 1993. “Suspicion and Dispositional Inference.”Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 19 (October): 501–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoeffler, Steve and Kevin Lane Keller. 2002. “Building Brand Equity Through Corporate Societal Marketing.”Journal of Public Policy and Marketing 21 (1): 78–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lafferty, Barbara A. and Ronald E. Goldsmith. 1999. “Corporate Credibility’s Role in Consumers’ Attitudes and Purchase Intentions When a High Versus Low Credibility Endorser is Used in the Ad.”Journal of Business Research 44 (February): 109–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • L’Etang, Jacquie. 1994. “Public Relations and Corporate Social Respon-sibility: Some Issues Arising.”Journal of Business Ethics 13(2): 111–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenstein, Donald R., Minette E. Drumwright, and Bridgette M. Braig. 2004. “The Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility on Customer Donations to Corporate-Supported Nonprofits.”Journal of Marketing 68 (October): 16–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maignan, Isabelle and David A. Ralston. 2002. “Corporate Social Responsibility in Europe and the U.S.: Insights From Businesses’ Self-Presentation.”Journal of International Business Studies 33 (3): 497–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, Matthew B. and A. Michael Huberman. 1994.Qualitative Data Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohr, Lois A. and Deborah J. Webb. 2005. “The Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility and Price on Consumer Responses.”Journal of Consumer Affairs 39 (1): 121–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, Richard L. and John E. Swan. 1989. “Consumer Perceptions of Interpersonal Equity and Satisfaction in Transactions: A Field Survey Approach.”Journal of Marketing 53 (April): 21–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osterhus, Thomas L. 1997. “Pro-Social Consumer Influence Strategies: When and How Do They Work?”Journal of Marketing 61 (October): 16–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roper Center at the University of Connecticut. 2004. Public Opinion Online, Conducted by Gallup Organization, May 31, 2004. Retrieved from http://web.lexis-nexis.com/universe/document?_m= 4e202c256342110260b891d0795578e6&_docnum=2&wchp= dGLbVzb-zSkVb&_md5=34elbb3d3e600c4f85ee56b392decd46

  • Rust, Roland T. and Bruce Cooil. 1994. “Reliability Measures for Qualitative Data: Theory and Implications.”Journal of Marketing Research 31 (February): 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sengupta, Jaideep, Ronald C. Goodstein, and David S. Boninger. 1997. “All Cues Are Not Created Equal: Obtaining Attitude Persistence Under Low-Involvement Conditions.”Journal of Consumer Research 23 (March): 351–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Craig. 1994. “The New Corporate Philanthropy.”Harvard Business Review 72 (May/June): 105–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, N. Craig. 2003. “Corporate Social Responsibility: Whether or How?”California Management Review 45 (June): 52–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, Diane L. 1995. “Addressing a Theoretical Problem by Reorienting the Corporate Social Performance Model.”Academy of Management Review 20 (1): 43–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varadarajan, P. Rajan and Anil Menon. 1988. “Cause-Related Marketing: A Coalignment of Marketing Strategy and Corporate Philanthropy.”Journal of Marketing 52 (July): 58–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb, Deborah J. and Lois A. Mohr. 1998. “A Typology of Consumer Responses to Cause-Related Marketing: From Skeptics to Socially Concerned.”Journal of Public Policy and Marketing 17 (Fall): 226–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whetten, David A. and Alison Mackey. 2002. “A Social Actor Conception of Organizational Identity and Its Implications for the Study of Organizational Reputation.”Business & Society 41(4): 393–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Patti and Jennifer L. Aaker. 2002. “Can Mixed Emotions Peacefully Coexist?”Journal of Consumer Research 28 (March): 636–649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Pam Scholder Ellen (pellen@gsu.edu) is an associate professor of marketing at the Robinson College of Business at Georgia State University. Her research focuses on perceptual biases in the way consumers respond to marketplace offers, particularly in the public policy arena. In addition to theJournal of the Academy of Marketing Science, her research has been published in theJournal of Consumer Research, theJournal of Public Policy & Marketing, theJournal of Consumer Affairs, and theJournal of Retailing.

Deborah J. Webb (dwebb@westga.edu) is an assistant professor of marketing at the Richards College of Business at the University of West Georgia. Her research interests include consumers’ responses to prosocial corporate behaviors, marketing and society issues, and donation behavior. Her research has been published in theJournal of the Academy of Marketing Science, theJournal of Retailing, theJournal of Public Policy & Marketing, theJournal of Consumer Affairs, andMarketing Education Review, among others.

Lois A. Mohr is a retired associate professor of marketing from the Robinson College of Business at Georgia State University. Her research interests focus on consumer responses to corporate social responsibility and services marketing. She has published in theJournal of Marketing, theJournal of Retailing, theJournal ofBusiness Research, the Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, theJournal of Consumer Affairs, and theJournal of Services Marketing.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ellen, P.S., Webb, D.J. & Mohr, L.A. Building corporate associations: Consumer attributions for corporate socially responsible programs. JAMS 34, 147–157 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070305284976

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070305284976

Keywords

Navigation