Skip to main content
Log in

Export marketing, interfunctional interactions, and performance consequences

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Firms with export operations have internal environments that are often geared toward serving the home market. As a result, export marketing and other business functions compete for resources, which thus increases the likelihood of conflict between them. Using survey responses from more than 700 exporting firms, the authors test a model of the antecedents and consequences of two important interaction variables: exporting’s interfunctional connectedness and conflict. The model explains 52 percent and 49 percent of variance in exporting connectedness and conflict, respectively. The authors identify the key drivers of successful interactions as follows: management commitment, organizational training and reward systems, relative functional identification, centralization, and export employee job satisfaction and commitment. The authors also demonstrate that connectedness is most critical for export success when export markets are in a state of turbulence, whereas conflict is most detrimental when the firm’s export environment is stable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, Paul F. and Terry Chambers. 1985. “A Rewards/Measurement Model of Organizational Buying Behavior.”Journal of Marketing 49 (Spring): 7–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, Richard P. and Todd F. Heatherton. 1994. “A General Approach to Representing Multifaceted Personality Constructs: Application to State Self-Esteem.”Structural Equation Modeling 1 (1): 35–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • — and Youjae Yi. 1988. “On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 16(1): 74–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, David E. 1996. “Market-Focused HRM in Service Organizations: Satisfying Internal and External Customers.”Journal of Market Focused Management 1 (1): 31–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cadogan, John W., Adamantios Diamantopoulos, and Charles Pahud de Mortanges. 1999. “Developing a Measure of Export Market Orientation: Scale Construction and Cross-Cultural Validation.”Journal of International Business Studies 30 (4): 689–707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —, and Judy A. Siguaw. 2002. “Export Market-Oriented Activities: Their Antecedents and Performance Consequences.”Journal of International Business Studies 33 (3): 615–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —, Nicola J. Paul, Risto T. Salminen, Kaisu Puumalainen, and Sanna Sundqvist. 2001. “Key Antecedents to ‘Export’ Market-Oriented Behaviors: A Cross-National Empirical Examination.”International Journal of Research in Marketing 18 (3): 261–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Churchill, Gilbert A., N. M. Ford, and Orville C. Walker Jr. 1974. “Measuring the Job Satisfaction of Industrial Salesmen.”Journal of Marketing Research 11 (August): 254–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Czinkota, Michael R. and Ilkka A. Ronkainen. 1995.International Marketing. 4th ed. Fort Worth, TX: Dryden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamantopoulos, Adamantios and John W. Cadogan. 1996. “Internationalising the Market Orientation Construct: An In-Depth Interview Approach.”Journal of Strategic Marketing 4(1): 23–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doucette, William R. and Thanigavelan Jambulingam. 1999. “Pharmacy Entrepreneurial Orientation: Antecedents and Its Effect on the Provision of Pharmacy Services.”Journal of Social and Administrative Pharmacy 16 (1): 26–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dougherty, Deborah. 1992. “Interpretive Barriers to Successful Product Innovation in Large Firms.”Organization Science 3 (May): 179–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, Robert J., Elliot Maltz, and Bernard J. Jaworski. 1997. “Enhancing Communication Between Marketing and Engineering: The Moderating Role of Relative Functional Identification.”Journal of Marketing 61 (July): 54–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • French, Wendell L., Fremont E. Kast, and James E. Rosenweig. 1985.Understanding Human Behavior in Organizations. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gencturk, Esra, Terry L. Childers, and Robert W. Ruekert. 1995. “International Marketing Involvement: The Construct, Dimensionality, and Measurement.”Journal of International Marketing 3 (4): 11–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerbing, David W. and Janet G. Hamilton. 1996. “Viability of Exploratory Factor Analysis as a Precursor to Confirmatory Factor Analysis.”Structural Equation Modeling 3(1): 62–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, K. Douglas and Thomas N. Ingram. 1992. “Service Provider Job Satisfaction and Customer-Oriented Performance.”Journal of Services Marketing 6 (2): 68–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaccard, James and Choi K. Wan. 1996.LISREL Approaches to Interaction Effects in Multiple Regression. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jap, Sandy D. and Shankar Ganesan. 2000. “Control Mechanisms and the Relationship Life Cycle: Implications for Safeguarding Specific Investments and Developing Commitment.”Journal of Marketing Research 37 (May): 227–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaworski, Bernard J. and Ajay K. Kohli. 1993. “Market Orientation: Antecedents and Consequences.”Journal of Marketing 57 (July): 53–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • John, George and John Martin. 1984. “Effects of Organizational Structure of Marketing Planning on Credibility and Utilization of Plan Output.”Journal of Marketing Research 21 (May): 170–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, Karl G. and Dag Sorbom. 1993.LISREL 8: Structural Equation Modeling With the SIMPLIS Command Language. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • — and Fan Yang. 1996. “Nonlinear Structural Equation Models: The Kenny-Judd Model With Interaction Effects.” InAdvanced Structural Equation Modeling: Issues and Techniques. George A. Marcoulides and Randall E. Schumacker. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 57–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, Kenneth B. 2001. “Market Orientation, Interdepartmental Integration, and Product Development Performance.”Journal of Product Innovation Management 18 (5): 314–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katsikeas, Constantine S., Leonidas C. Leonidou, and Neil A. Morgan. 2000. “Firm-Level Export Performance Assessment: Review, Evaluation, and Development.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 28 (4): 493–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —, Nigel F. Piercy, and Chris Ioannidis. 1996. “Determinants of Export Performance in a European Context.”European Journal of Marketing 30 (6): 6–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kearney, Richard C. and Steven W. Hays. 1994. “Labor-Management Relations and Participative Decision Making: Towards a New Paradigm.”Public Administration Review 54 (1): 44–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohli, Ajay K. and Bernard J. Jaworski. 1990. “Market Orientation: The Construct, Research Propositions, and Managerial Implications.”Journal of Marketing 54 (April): 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krohmer, Harley, Christian Homburg, and John P. Workman. 2002. “Should Marketing Be Cross-Functional? Conceptual Development and International Empirical Evidence.”Journal of Business Research 55 (6): 451–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonidou, Leonidas C, Constantine S. Katsikeas, and Nigel F. Piercy. 1998. “Identifying Managerial Influences on Exporting: Past Research and Future Directions.”Journal of International Marketing 6 (2): 74–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, Scott B., Philip M. Podsakoff, and Michael Ahearne. 1998. “Some Possible Antecedents and Consequences of In-Role and Extra-Role Salesperson Performance.”Journal of Marketing 62 (July): 74–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Majchrzak, Ann and Qianwei Wang. 1996. “Breaking the Functional Mind-Set in Process Organizations.”Harvard Business Review 74 (September-October): 93–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maltz, Elliot. 1997. “An Enhanced Framework for Improving Cooperation Between Marketing and Other Functions: The Differential Role of Integrating Mechanisms.”Journal of Market Focused Management 2 (1): 83–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — and Ajay K. Kohli. 2000. “Reducing Marketing’s Conflict With Other Functions: The Differential Effects of Integrating Mechanisms.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 28 (4): 479–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsden, Peter V., Cynthia R. Cook, and Arne L. Kalleberg. 1994. “Organizational Structures: Coordination and Control.”American Behavioral Scientist 37 (7): 911–929.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menon, Ajay, Bernard J. Jaworski, and Ajay K. Kohli. 1997. “Product Quality: Impact of Interdepartmental Interactions.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 25 (3): 187–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menon, Anil, Sundar G. Bharadwaj, and Roy Howell. 1996. “The Quality and Effectiveness of Marketing Strategy: Effects of Functional and Dysfunctional Conflict in Intraorganizational Relationships.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 24 (4): 299–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohr-Jackson, Iris. 1991. “Broadening the Market Orientation: An Added Focus on Internal Customers.”Human Resource Management 30 (4): 455–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, David B. and Frederick E. Webster Jr. 1997. “Marketing’s Interfunctional Interfaces: The MSI Workshop on Management of Corporate Fault Zones.”Journal of Market Focused Management 2 (1): 7–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, Neil A. and Nigel F. Piercy. 1998. “Interactions Between Marketing and Quality at the SBU Level: Influences and Outcomes.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 26 (3): 190–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norburn, David, Mark G. Dunn, Sue Birley, and W. Randy Boxx. 1995. “Corporate Values and the Marketing Concept: Examining Interfunctional Relationships.”Journal of Strategic Marketing 3 (4): 215–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ping, Robert A., Jr. 1995. “A Parsimonious Estimation Technique for Interaction and Quadratic Latent Variables.”Journal of Marketing Research 32 (August): 336–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinto, Mary Beth, Jeffrey K. Pinto, and John E. Prescott. 1993. “Antecedents and Consequences of Project Team Cross-Functional Cooperation.”Management Science 39 (10): 1281–1297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, Lyman W., Richard M. Steers, Richard T. Mowday, and P. V. Boulian. 1974. “Organizational Commitment, Job Satisfaction, and Turnover Among Psychiatric Technicians.”Journal of Applied Psychology 59 (October): 603–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, Michael E. 1985.Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, Thomas W. and Bryan S. Lilly. 1996. “The Effects of Conflict, Trust, and Task Commitment on Project Team Performance.”International Journal of Conflict Management 7 (4): 361–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruekert, Robert W. 1992. “Developing a Market Orientation: An Organizational Strategy Perspective.”International Journal of Research in Marketing 9 (3): 225–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — and Orville C. Walker Jr. 1987. “Marketing’s Interaction With Other Functional Units: A Conceptual Framework and Empirical Evidence.”Journal of Marketing 51 (January): 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — and —, and Kenneth J. Roering. 1985. “The Organization of Marketing Activities: A Contingency Theory of Structure and Performance.”Journal of Marketing 49 (Winter): 13–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlegelmilch, B. B., A. Diamantopoulos, and K. Y. K. Tse. 1993. “Determinants of Export Marketing Research Usage: Testing Some Hypotheses on UK Exporters.”Perspectives on Marketing Management 3:119–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sethi, Rajesh. 2000. “Superordinate Identity in Cross-Functional Product Development Teams: Its Antecedents and Effect on New Product Performance.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 28 (3): 681–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shoham, Aviv. 1998. “Export Performance: A Conceptualization and Empirical Assessment.”Journal of International Marketing 6 (3): 59–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • — and Gerald Albaum. 1994. “The Effect of Transfer of Marketing Methods on Export Performance: An Empirical Examination.”International Business Review 3 (3): 219–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SKOD. 1998. “Scandinavian Kompass on Disc.” Database. Published by Kompass Norway, Finland, Sweden, and Denmark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slater, Stanley F. and John C. Narver. 1994. “Does Competitive Environment Moderate the Market Orientation-Performance Relationship?”Journal of Marketing 58 (January): 46–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tjosvold, Dean. 1988. “Cooperation and Competitive Interdependence: Collaboration Between Departments to Serve Customers.”Group & Organization Studies 13 (3): 274–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1990. “Cooperation and Competition in Restructuring an Organization.”Canadian Journal of Administrative Science 7 (June): 48–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Valerie Dann, and Choy Wong. 1992. “Managing Conflicts Between Departments to Serve Customers.”Human Relations 45 (10): 1035–1054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webster, Frederick E., Jr. 1988. “The Rediscovery of the Marketing Concept”Business Horizons 31 (May-June): 29–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiersema, Margarethe F. and Karen A. Bantel. 1993. “Top Management Team Turnover as an Adaptation Mechanism: The Role of the Environment”Strategic Management Journal 14 (7): 485–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoon, Jeongkoo, Mouraine R. Baker, and Jong-Wook Ko. 1994. “Interpersonal Attachment and Organizational Commitment: Subgroup Hypothesis Revisited.”Human Relations 47 (3): 329–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zinkhan, George M. and James A. Verbrugge. 2000. “Introduction.” The Marketing/Finance Interface [Special Issue].Journal of Business Research 50 (2): 139–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — and Richard T. Watson. 1998. “Electronic Commerce: A Marriage of Management Information Systems and Marketing.”Journal of Market-Focused Management 3 (1): 5–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — and F. Christian Zinkhan. 1997. “The Interface Between Marketing and Finance: Integrated Management in an Unstable World.”Managerial Finance 23 (10): 3–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

John W. Cadogan (j.w.cadogan@lboro.ac.uk), Ph.D., is a professor of marketing in the Business School at Loughborough University, United Kingdom. His primary areas of research interest are international marketing, marketing strategy, and sales management. He has published on these issues in theJournal of International Business Studies, theInternational Journal of Research in Marketing, theJournal of Business Research, Industrial Marketing Management, theEuropean Journal of Marketing, theInternational Marketing Review, theJournal of Marketing Management, theJournal of Strategic Marketing, and other academic journals. He received his degree from the University of Wales (United Kingdom).

Sanna Sundqvist (sanna.sundqvist@lut.fi), Ph.D., is a professor in international marketing in the Department of Business Administration at the Lappeenranta University of Technology (Finland). Her research interests deal with the international diffusion of innovations, market orientation (especially in an international context), and consumers’ adoption behavior. She has published in theJournal of Business Research, theInternational Journal of Research in Marketing, theEuropean Journal of Marketing, theCanadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, and theAustralasian Marketing Journal. She received her degree from the Lappeenranta University of Technology, Finland.

Risto T. Saiminen (risto.salminen@lut.fi), Ph.D., is a professor of industrial engineering and management, especially marketing, in the Department of Industrial Engineering and Management at Lappeenranta University of Technology, Finland. His primary areas of research interest are customer relationships and networks in business marketing, pedagogy in industrial engineering and management, and international marketing. He has published on these issues in theJournal of Business and Industrial Marketing, theJournal of Marketing Management, theEuropean Journal of Engineering Education, theInternational Journal of Research in Marketing, theEuropean Journal of Marketing, and theAustralasian Marketing Journal. He received his degree from Lappeenranta University of Technology, Finland.

Kaisu Puumalainen (kaisu.puumalainen@lut.fi), Ph.D., is a professor in technology research in the Department of Business Administration at Lappeenranta University of Technology, Finland. Her primary areas of research interest are innovation, international marketing, and small businesses. She has published on these issues in theInternational Journal of Research in Marketing, theJournal of Business Research, theEuropean Journal of Marketing, R&D Management, theCanadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, theJournal of International Entrepreneurship, theAustralasian Marketing Journal, and theInternational Journal of Production Economics. She received her degree from the Lappeenranta University of Technology, Finland.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cadogan, J.W., Sundqvist, S., Salminen, R.T. et al. Export marketing, interfunctional interactions, and performance consequences. JAMS 33, 520–535 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070305276148

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070305276148

Keywords

Navigation