Skip to main content
Log in

Determinants of sports sponsorship response

  • Published:
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite the growing role of sponsorship in the marketing activities of firms worldwide, academic research in this area has been limited. Adopting a classical conditioning framework, this research examines the effects of consumers’ attitudes about a sports event, their perceptions of sponsor-event fit, and their attitudes about the sponsor on a multidimensional measure of sponsorship response. The results suggest that sponsor-event fit, perceived sincerity of the sponsor, perceived ubiquity of the sponsor, and attitude toward the sponsor are key factors in generating a favorable response from sponsorship. Liking of the event and perceived status of the event have differing significance depending on how response is measured. Sponsorevent fit also has interaction effects with perceived status of the event and personal interest in the event. The implications of these findings for sponsors and event managers are examined, and future research directions are outlined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aaker, Jennifer L. 1997. “Dimensions of Brand Personality.”Journal of Marketing Research 34: 347–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, Chris T. and Chris A. Janiszewski. 1989. “Assessing the Role of Contingency Awareness in Attitudinal Conditioning With Implications for Advertising Research.”Journal of Marketing Research 26: 30–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, Clive 1987. “Sports Sponsorship: A Case-Study Approach to Measuring Its Effectiveness.”European Research 16(2): 97–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacharach, Samuel B. 1989. “Organizational Theories: Some Criteria for Evaluation.”Academy of Management Review 14(4): 496–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, Richard P. and Youjae Yi 1988. “On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 16: 74–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bornstein, R.F. 1989. “Exposure and Affect: Overview and Meta-Analysis of Research.”Psychological Bulletin 106 (2): 265–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, Gordon C. and Paul J. Hensel 1992.Marketing Scales Handbook. Chicago: American Marketing Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, Marian Chapman and Julie A. Edell. 1989. “The Impact of Feelings on Ad-Based Affect and Cognition.”Journal of Marketing Research 26: 69–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornwell, T. Bettina and Isabelle Maignan 1998. “An International Review of Sponsorship Research.”Journal of Advertising 27(1): 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cortez, John P. 1992. “Julius Keeps the Score for Sports Promotion.”Advertising Age 63 (22): 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crimmins, James and Martin Horn 1996. “Sponsorship: From Managerial Ego Trip to Marketing Success.”Journal of Advertising Research 36(4): 11–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Astous, Alain and Pierre Bitz 1995. “Consumer Evaluations of Sponsorship Programmes.”European Journal of Marketing 29(12): 6–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donovan, Rob J., C. D’arcy J. Holman, Billie Corti, and Geoffrey Jalleh. 1997. “Evaluating Sponsorship Effectiveness: An Epidemiological Approach to Analysing Survey Data.”Australiasian Journal of Marketing Research 5(2): 9–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerbing, D. W., and J. C. Anderson. 1988. “An Updated Paradigm for Scale Development Incorporating Unidimensionality and Its Assessment.”Journal of Marketing Research 25: 186–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glazer, B. and A. Strauss 1967.The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grunert, Klaus G. 1996. “Automatic and Strategic Processes in Advertising Effects.”Journal of Marketing 60(4): 88–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, Joseph F., Rolph E. Anderson, Ronald L. Tatham, and William C. Black. 1992.Multivariate Data Analysis. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, Flemming and Lene Scotwin 1995. “An Experimental Enquiry Into Sponsoring: What Effects Can Be Measured?.”Marketing and Research Today 23(3): 173–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermanns, Arnold, Norbert Drees, and Edgar Wangen 1986. “Zur Wahrnehmung von Werbebotschaften auf Rennfahrzeugen” (On the Recognition of Advertising Messages on Racing Vehicles).Marketing: Zeitschrift für Forschung und Praxis 8(2): 123–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Javalgi, Rajshekhar G., Mark B. Traylor, Andrew C. Gross, and Edward Lampman. 1994. “Awareness of Sponsorship and Corporate Image: An Empirical Investigation.”Journal of Advertising 23(4): 47–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahle, Lynn R. and Pamela M. Homer. 1985. “Physical Attractiveness of the Celebrity Endorser: A Social Adaption Perspective.”Journal of Consumer Research 11: 954–961.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamins, Michael 1990. “An Investigation Into the Match-up Hypothesis of Celebrity Advertising.”Journal of Advertising 19(1): 4–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kate, Nancy Ten. 1995. “And Now, a Word From Our Sponsor.”Marketing Tools, June, pp. 46–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lance, Charles E. 1988. “Residual Centering, Exploratory and Confirmatory Moderator Analysis, and Decomposition in Path Models Containing Interactions.”Applied Psychological Measurement 12(2): 163–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCracken, Grant 1989. “Who Is the Celebrity Endorser? Cultural Foundations of the Endorsement Process.”Journal of Consumer Research 16 (December): 310–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meenaghan, Tony 1983. “Commercial Sponsorship.”European Journal of Marketing 17(7): 5–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1996. “Ambush Marketing—A Threat to Corporate Sponsorship.”Sloan Management Review 38(1): 103–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1998. “Current Developments and Future Directions in Sponsorship.”International Journal of Advertising 17(1): 328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyers-Levy, Joan and Alice M. Tybout 1989. “Schema Contigruity as a Basis for Product Evaluation.”Journal of Consumer Research 16(1): 39–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, Andrew A. and Jerry C. Olsen 1981. “Are Product Attribute Beliefs the Only Mediator of Advertising Effects on Brand Attitude?.”Journal of Marketing Research 28: 318–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, Deborah J., Barbara E. Kahn, and Susan C. Knasko 1995. “There’s Something in the Air: Effects of Congruent or Incongruent Ambient Odor on Consumer Decision Making.”Journal of Consumer Research 22(2): 229–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohanian, Roobina 1991. “The Impact of Celebrity Spokespersons’ Image on Consumers’ Intentions to Purchase.”Journal of Advertising Research 31 (February–March): 46–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otker, Ton and Peter Hayes 1987. “Judging the Efficiency of Sponsorship.”European Research 15 (4): 53–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petty, Richard E., John T. Cacioppo, and David Schumann 1983. “Central and Peripheral Routes to Advertising Effectiveness: The Moderating Role of Involvement.”Journal of Consumer Research 10 (September): 135–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, S., S. Durvasula, and William Dillon 1989. “Some Results on the Behavior of Alternate Covariance Structure Estimation Procedures in the Presence of Non-Normal Data.”Journal of Marketing Research 26: 214–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shimp, Terence A. 1981. “Attitude Toward the Ad as a Mediator of Consumer Brand Choice.”Journal of Advertising 10(2): 9–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1991. “Neo-Pavlovian Conditioning and Its Implications for Consumer Theory and Research.” InHandbook of Consumer Behaviour. Eds. Thomas S. Robertson and Harold H. Kassarjian. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 162–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shoebridge, Neil 1995. “Selling Sponsorships an Olympian Task.”Business Review Weekly 17(22): 76–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stipp, Horst and Nicholas P. Schiavone 1996. “Modeling the Impact of Olympic Sponsorship on Corporate Image.”Journal of Advertising Research 36(4): 22–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuart, Elnora W., Terence A. Shimp, and Randall W. Engle 1987. “Classical Conditioning of Consumer Attitudes: Four Experiments in an Advertising Context.”Journal of Consumer Research 14 (December): 334–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Till, Brian D. and Michael Busler 1998. “Matching Products With Endorsers: Attractiveness Versus Expertise.”Journal of Consumer Marketing 15(6): 576–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treadgold, Tim 1997. “A Master Stroke for Heineken and Sanwa.”Business Review Weekly 19 (3): 36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zajonc, Robert B. 1980. “Feeling and Thinking: Preferences Need No Inferences.”American Psychologist 35 (2): 151–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Richard Speed is an associate professor of marketing in the Melbourne Business School at the University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia. He received his Ph.D. from the Loughborough University of Technology, United Kingdom. In addition to sponsorship, he researches and publishes on decision-making for marketing strategy and the use and management of brands.

Peter Thompson is principal of Et2 Sponsorship Strategy and a visiting research fellow of the Melbourne Business School at the University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia. He holds a B.D.Sc. and an MBA from the University of Melbourne. His reserch of sports marketing, personality management, and sports broadcasting.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Speed, R., Thompson, P. Determinants of sports sponsorship response. J. of the Acad. Mark. Sci. 28, 226–238 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070300282004

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070300282004

Keywords

Navigation