Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Label versus position in rating scales

  • Published:
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The current study is important for two reasons: First, it demonstrates a procedure for isolating both the label and position effects in rating scales. In addition, it indicates that subjects seem to respond to the actual adjectives employed rather than to their positions relative to the endpoints. Further research should be conducted, in order to determine the relative importance of label and position effects in rating scales, using subjects other than students. Since much research involves the use of rating scales, this is certainly an important area that warrants considerably more investigation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bartram, P. and Yielding, D. 1973. “The Development of an Empirical Method of Selecting Phrases Used in Verbal Rating Scales: A Report on a Recent Experiment.”Journal of the Market Research Society 15, 151–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cliff, N. 1959. “Adverbs as Multipliers.”Psychological Review 66, 27–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, P.E. and Rao, V.R. 1970. “Rating Scales and Information Recovery: How Many Scales and Response Categories to Use?”Journal of Marketing 34, 33–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, J. and Matell, M.s. 1971. “Three-point Likert Scales are Good Enough.”Journal of Marketing Research 8, 495–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, L.V. and Thurstone, L.L. 1955. “The Psychophysics of Semantics: An Experimental Investigation.”Journal of Applied Psychology 39, 31–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, D.R. and Hulbert, J. 1972. “Are Three-point Scales Always Good Enough?”Journal of Marketing Research 9, 444–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mittelstaedt, R.A. 1971. “Semantic Properties of Selected Evaluative Adjectives: Other Evidence.”Journal of Marketing Research 8, 236–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, J.H. and Warner, W.G. 1968. “Semantic Properties of Selected Evaluation Adjectives.”Journal of Marketing Research 5, 409–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wildt, A.R. and Mazis, M.B. 1978. “Determinants of Scale Response: Label Versus Position.”Journal of Marketing Research 15, 261–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worcester, R.M. and Burns, T.R. 1975. “A Statistical Examination of the Relative Precision of Verbal Scales.”Journal of the Market Research Society 17, 181–197.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Fordham University, New York, USA

    Hershey H. Friedman Ph.D.

Authors
  1. Hershey H. Friedman Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Joanna R. Leefer M.B.A.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Interpublic Group of Companies

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Friedman, H.H., Leefer, J.R. Label versus position in rating scales. JAMS 9, 88–92 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02723568

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02723568

Keywords

Search

Navigation