Skip to main content
Log in

Technology infusion in service encounters

  • Published:
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Service encounters are critical in all industries, including those that have not been traditionally defined as service industries. The increasing deployment of technology is altering the essence of service encounters formerly anchored in a “low-tech, high-touch” paradigm. This article explores the changing nature of service, with an emphasis on how encounters can be improved through the effective use of technology. The authors examine the ability of technology to effectively (1) customize service offerings, (2) recover from service failure, and (3) spontaneously delight customers. The infusion of technology is examined as an enabler of both employees and customers in efforts to achieve these three goals. Although the infusion of technology can lead to negative outcomes and may not be embraced by all customers, the focus of this article is on the benefits of thoughtfully managed and effectively implemented technology applications. Past research and industry examples are featured and future research directions and managerial implications are highlighted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bettencourt, Lance A. and Kevin Gwinner. 1996. “Customization of the Service Experience: The Role of the Frontline Employee.”International Journal of Service Industry Management 7 (2): 3–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bitner, Mary Jo. 1990. “Evaluating Service Encounters:The Effects of Physical Surroundings and Employee Responses.”Journal of Marketing 54 (April): 69–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1995. “Building Service Relationships: It's All About Promises.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 23 (4): 246–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —, Bernard H. Booms, and Mary Stanfield Tetreault. 1990. “The Service Encounter: Diagnosing Favorable and Unfavorable Incidents.”Journal of Marketing 54 (January): 71–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —,—, and Lois A. Mohr. 1994. “Critical Service Encounters: The Employee's Viewpoint.”Journal of Marketing 58 (October): 95–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — and Amy R. Hubbert. 1994. “Encounter Satisfaction Versus Overall Satisfaction Versus Quality: The Customer's Voice.” InService Quality: New Directions in Theory and Practice. Eds. Roland T. Rust and Richard L. Oliver. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 72–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolton, Ruth N. 1998. “A Dynamic Model of the Duration of the Customer's Relationship With a Continuous Service Provider: The Role of Satisfaction.”Marketing Science 17 (1): 45–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briones, Maricris G. 1999. “Resellers Hike Profits Through Service.”Marketing News 33 (4): 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Stephen W. 1997. “Service Recovery Through IT.”Marketing Management 6 (Fall): 25–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chu, Wujin, Eitan Gerstner, and James D. Hess. 1998. “Managing Dissatisfaction: How to Decrease Customer Opportunism by Partial Refunds.”Journal of Service Research 1 (2): 140–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Czepiel, John A. 1990. “Service Encounters and Service Relationships: Implications for Research.”Journal of Business Research 20 (January): 13–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dabholkar, Pratibha A. 1991. “Using Technology-Based Self-Service Options to Improve Perceived Service Quality.” InAMA Summer Educator's Conference Proceedings. Eds. Mary C. Gilly, Thomas W. Leigh, Marsha L. Richins, Alladi Venkatesh, Roby Roy Dholakia, F.Robert Dwyer, Alan J. Dubinsky, David Curry, Masaaki Kotabe, and Gerald E. Hills. Chicago: American Marketing Association, 534–535.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1994. “Technology-Based Service Delivery: A Classification Scheme for Developing Marketing Strategies.” InAdvances in Services Marketing and Management, Vol. 3. Eds. Teresa A. Swartz., David E. Bowen, and Stephen W. Brown. Greenwich, CT: JAI, 241–271.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • — 1996. “Consumer Evaluations of New Technology-Based Self-Service Options: An Investigation of Alternative Models of Service Quality.”International Journal of Research in Marketing 13 (1): 29–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 2000. “Technology in Service Delivery: Implications for Self-Service and Service Support.” InHandbook of Services Marketing and Management. Eds. Teresa A. Swartz and Dawn Iacobucci. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 103–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eastlick, Mary Ann. 1996. “Consumer Intention to Adopt Interactive Teleshopping.” Marketing Science Institute Working Paper. Report No. 96-113. Cambridge, MA.

  • Fisher, Lawrence M. 1998. “Here Comes Front-Office Automation.”Strategy & Business 13 (4th quarter): 53–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisk, Raymond P., Stephen W. Brown, and Mary Jo Bitner. 1993. “Tracking the Evolution of the Services Marketing Literature.”Journal of Retailing 69 (1): 61–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, Claes, Michael D. Johnson, Eugene W. Anderson, Jaesung Cha, and Barbara Everitt Bryant. 1996. “The American Customer Satisfaction Index: Nature, Purpose and Findings.”Journal of Marketing 60 (October): 7–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gremler, Dwayne D. and Stephen W. Brown. 1999. “The Loyalty Ripple Effect: Appreciating the Full Value of Customers.”International Journal of Service Industry Management 10 (3): 271–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gwinner, Kevin P. 1997. “The Adaptive Behaviors of Boundary-Spanning Service Personnel: Identifying Antecedents and Consequences.” Dissertation. Arizona State University, Tempe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, Christopher W. 1996. “Made to Order.”Marketing Management 5 (2): 11–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, James L. Heskett, and W. Earl Sasser, Jr. 1990. “The Profitable Art of Service Recovery.”Harvard Business Review 68 (July–August): 148–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henkoff, Ronald. 1994. “Service is Everybody's Business.”Fortune, June 27, pp. 48-60.

  • Johnston, Robert. 1995. “Service Failure and Recovery: Impact, Attributes and Process.” InAdvances in Services Marketing and Management. Eds. Teresa A. Swartz, David E. Bowen, and Stephen W. Brown. Greenwich, CT: JAI, 211–228.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Keaveney, Susan M. 1995. “Customer Switching Behavior in Service Industries: An Exploratory Study.”Journal of Marketing 59 (April): 71–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, Scott W. 1993. “Discretion and the Service Employee.”Journal of Retailing 69 (Spring): 104–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotler, Philip and Gary Armstrong. 1997.Marketing: An Introduction. 4th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leaf, Clifton. 1998. “The Death of Customer Service.”Smart Money (October): 131–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovelock, Christopher. 1994.Product Plus. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meuter, Matthew L., Amy Ostrom, Robert Roundtree, and Mary Jo Bitner. Forthcoming. “Self-Service Technologies: Understanding Customer Satisfaction With Technology-Based Service Encounters.”Journal of Marketing.

  • Mick, David Glen and Susan Fournier. 1998. “Paradoxes of Technology: Consumer Cognizance, Emotions, and Coping Strategies.” Marketing Science Institute Working Paper. Report No. 98-112. Cambridge, MA.

  • “Now Are You Satisfied?” 1998.Fortune, February 16, pp. 161-168.

  • Oliver, Richard L. 1997.Satisfaction: A Behavioral Perspective on the Consumer. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Roland T. Rust, and Sajee Varki. 1997. “Customer Delight: Foundations, Findings, and Managerial Insight.”Journal of Retailing 73 (3): 311–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parasuraman, A. 1996. “Understanding and Leveraging the Role of Customer Service in External, Interactive, and Internal Marketing.” Frontiers in Services Conference, Nashville, TN. October 5.

  • —, Valarie A. Zeithaml, and Leonard L. Berry. 1985. “A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and Its Implications for Future Research.”Journal of Marketing 49 (Fall): 41–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —,—, and —. 1994. “Ressessment of Expectations as a Comparison Standard in Measuring Service Quality: Implications for Further Research.”Journal of Marketing 58 (January): 111–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pepper, Don and Martha Rogers. 1997.Enterprise One to One: Tools for Competing in the Interactive Age. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pine, B. Joseph II. 1993.Mass Customization: The New Frontier in Business Competition. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, James Brian. 1996. “The Productivity Paradox Is False: Information Technology Improves Service Performance.” InAdvances in Services Marketing and Management, Vol. 5 Eds. Teresa A. Swatz, David E. Bowen, and Stephen W. Brown. Greenwich, CT: JAI, 71–84.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rayport, Jeffrey F. and John J. Sviokla. 1994. “Managing in the Marketspace.”Harvard Business Review 72 (November–December): 2–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • — and —. 1995. “Exploiting the Virtual Value Chain.”Harvard Business Review 73 (November–December): 14–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rust, Roland. 1998. “What Is the Domain of Service Research?”Journal of Service Research 1 (2): 107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, Benjamin and David E. Bowen. 1995.Winning the Service Game. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, Richard A. 1999. “Handling Customer Service on the Web.”Fortune, March 1, pp. 204–208.

  • Shostack, G. Lynn. 1985. “Planning the Service Encounter.” InThe Service Encounter. Eds. John A. Czepiel, Michael R. Solomon, and Carol F. Surprenant. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 243–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slater, Chuck. 1998. “This Company's Seen the Future of Customer Service.”Fast Company February–March, 34–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smart, Tim. 1996. “Jack Welch's Encore.”Business Week, October 28, pp. 154–160.

  • Smith, Amy K. and Ruth N. Bolton. 1998. “An Experimental Investigation of Customer Reactions to Service Failure and Recovery Encounters: Paradox or Peril?”Journal of Service Research 1 (1): 65–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Surprenant, Carol F. and Michael R. Solomon. 1987. “Predictability and Personalization in the Service Encounter.”Journal of Marketing 51 (April): 73–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tax, Stephen S. and Stephen W. Brown. 1998. “Recovering and Learning From Service Failure.”Sloan Management Review 40 (1): 75–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,—, and Murali Chandrashekaran. 1998. “Customer Evaluations of Service Complaint Experiences: Implications for Relationship Marketing.”Journal of Marketing 62 (April): 60–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winsted, Kathryn Frazer. 1997. “The Service Experience in Two Cultures: A Behavioral Perspective.”Journal of Retailing 73 (3): 337–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahorik, Anthony J. and Roland T. Rust. 1992. “Modeling the Impact of Service Quality on Profitability: A Review.” InAdvances in Services Marketing and Management, Vol. 5. Eds. Teresa A. Swartz, David E. Bowen, and Stephen W. Brown. Greenwich, CT: JAI, 247–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeithaml, Valarie A., Leonard L. Berry, and A. Parasuraman. 1988. “Communication and Control Processes in the Delivery of Service Quality.”Journal of Marketing 52 (April): 35–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —,—, and — 1996. “The Behavioral Consequences of Service Quality.”Journal of Marketing 60 (April): 31–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Mary Jo Bitner is the AT&T Professor of Services Marketing and Management and the research director of the Center for Services Marketing & Management at Arizona State University. Her research focuses on customer evaluations of service, selfservice technologies, and service delivery issues. She has published in theJournal of Marketing, theJournal of the Academy of Marketing Science, theJournal of Business Research, theJournal of Retailing, and theInternational Journal of Service Industry Management. She is coauthor of the textServices Marketing (McGraw-Hill, 2d ed., 2000).

Stephen W. Brown holds the Edward M. Carson Chair of Services Marketing and Management, is Professor of Marketing, and director of the Center for Services Marketing & Management at Arizona State University. His research focuses on services marketing strategy, service delivery, customer loyalty, and service recovery. He has published in theJournal of Marketing, theJournal of Marketing Research, theJournal of the Academy of Marketing Science, theJournal of Business Research, and theJournal of Retailing. He is the coeditor of theAdvances in Services Marketing and Management series.

Matthew L. Meuter is Assistant Professor of Marketing at Villanova University with a Ph.D. in marketing from Arizona State University. His research interests focus on the impact technology has on the marketing function, the changing nature of technologically based service encounters, customer satisfaction with self-service technologies, and customer adoption of technologically based service delivery innovations. His research has been published in the American Marketing Association's (AMA)Educators' Proceedings and has been presented at several national conferences.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bitner, M.J., Brown, S.W. & Meuter, M.L. Technology infusion in service encounters. J. of the Acad. Mark. Sci. 28, 138–149 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070300281013

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070300281013

Keywords

Navigation