Skip to main content
Log in

Helping International Medical Graduates Engage in Effective Feedback

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Academic Psychiatry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

Timely, specific, behaviorally-based feedback is a cornerstone of medical education. The authors review basic tenets of effective feedback delivery in the context of potential challenges faced by (non-United States) international medical graduates (IMGs).

Method

The authors provide a brief summary of the elements of effective feedback, with illustrations of potential barriers for IMGs.

Results

Many IMGs were trained in a hierarchical system, where feedback was delivered publicly, in a manner associated with shame and embarrassment. These experiences, combined with the challenge of functioning in a second language and anxieties over exposing weaknesses, present some barriers that make it more difficult for them to participate in feedback inquiry, self-reflection, and reciprocal feedback.

Conclusions

These challenges can be mitigated by acknowledging the anxieties that learners may have, fostering a learning culture that values feedback as an expected and important part of all learning, ensuring that all (learners and supervisors) are trained in feedback skills, and clear setting of expectations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Adelle Atkinson, Christopher J. Watling & Paul L. P. Brand

References

  1. Ende J: Feedback in clinical medical education. JAMA 1983; 250:777–781

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Teunissen PW, Stapel DA, van der Vleuten C, et al: Who wants feedback? an investigation of the variables influencing residents’ feedback-seeking behavior in relation to night shifts. Acad Med 2009; 84:910–917

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bates J, Andrew R: Untangling the roots of some IMGs’ poor academic performance. Acad Med 2001; 76:43–46

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Brotherton SE, Etzel SI: Graduate medical education, 2009–2010. JAMA 2010; 304:1255–1270

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. American Psychiatric Association Resident Census 2009–2010

  6. American Association of Medical Colleges: GME Track 2009 au7._Walsh A. Working with IMGS: Delivering Effective Feedback. A Faculty Development Program for Teachers of International Medical Graduates. McMaster University, April 2006

  7. Searight HR, Gafford J: Behavioral science education and the international medical graduate. Acad Med 2006; 81: 164–170

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dorgan KA, Lang F, Floyd M, et al: International medical graduate—patient communication: a qualitative analysis of perceived barriers. Acad Med 2009; 84:1567–1575

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Brinko K: The practice of giving feedback to improve teaching: what is effective? J Higher Ed 1993;64(5):574–593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hewson MG, Little ML: Giving feedback in medical education: verification of recommended techniques. J Gen Intern Med 1998; 13:111–116

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bienstock JL, Katz NT, Cox SM; Association of Professors of Gynecology and Obstetrics Undergraduate Medical Education Committee: To the point: medical education reviews: providing feedback. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 196:508–513

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Boehler M, Rodgers D, Schwinnd C, et al: An investigation of medical student reactions to feedback: a randomized, controlled trial. Med Ed 2006; 40:746–749

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Milan FB, Parish SJ, Reichgott MJ: A model for educational feedback based on clinical communication skills strategies: beyond the “feedback sandwich.” Teach Learn Med 2006; 18:42–47

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Elliott R, Yudkowsky R, Vogel R: Quality in psychiatric training: development of a resident satisfaction questionnaire. Acad Psychiatry 2000; 24:41–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ellencweig N, Weizman A, Fischel T: Factors determining satisfaction in psychiatry training in Israel. Acad Psychiatry 2009; 33:169–173

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, Common Program Requirements, July 2011

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karen E. Broquet M.D..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Broquet, K.E., Punwani, M. Helping International Medical Graduates Engage in Effective Feedback. Acad Psychiatry 36, 282–287 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ap.11020031

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ap.11020031

Keywords

Navigation