Skip to main content
Log in

Mentoring Increases Connectedness and Knowledge: A Cross-Sectional Evaluation of Two Programs in Child and Adolescent Psychiatry

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Academic Psychiatry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

The authors assess changes in knowledge and feeling connected to the field of child and adolescent psychiatry (CAP) after participation in a brief mentoring program held at two CAP conferences.

Methods

Similar mentorship programs were implemented at two CAP conferences, one national (N = 119 participants), one international (N = 53). The 4-day programs were part of larger travel awards, and included daily small group meetings consisting of a mode of two mentors and six participants. The authors created a survey with 40 quantitative questions designed to measure the change in participants’ perceptions related to the conference and mentoring program, and provided additional fields for narrative comments.

Results

Mean participant ratings were positive for all questions on the survey. Changes in connectedness were rated higher than those in knowledge. The highest mean ratings were related to feeling more connected to the host organization, to CAP, and to other program participants. Outcomes were similar between the two conferences, except for knowledge gained on research, which was higher among participants in the international meeting. Outcomes were similar across demographic variables, except for internationally trained participants rating higher on research knowledge, connectedness, and overall knowledge. Over 75% of participants felt they made a connection with their mentor bonded as a group, and learned new things about CAP and the host organization. A qualitative review of comments revealed several themes, including heightened importance of networking, increased awareness of the field, improved connectedness, a desire for trainee-focused events and mixed feelings about how much structure to provide within the mentorship experience.

Conclusion

A brief group-style mentoring program is logistically feasible within large conferences, and can result in broad positive impact for trainees. Future studies are warranted to determine if these programs have lasting effects on connectedness, career choice and career development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hitchcock MA, Bland CJ, Hekelman FP, et al: Professional networks: the influence of colleagues on the academic success of faculty. Acad Med 1995; 70: 1108–1116

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Rivera JA, Levine RB, Wright SM: Completing a scholarly project during residency training: perspectives of residents who have been successful. J General Internal Med 2005; 20: 366–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Scribner DR Jr, Baldwin J, Mannel RS: Gynecologic oncologists’ perceptions of fellowship training. J Reproductive Med 2005; 50: 29–34

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sambunjak D, Straus SE, Marusi A: Mentoring in academic medicine: a systematic review. JAMA 2006; 296: 1103–1115

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Pincus HA, Haviland MG, Dial TH, et al: The relationship of postdoctoral research training to current research activities of faculty in academic departments of psychiatry. Am J Psychiatry 1995; 152: 596–601

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mrazek DA, Shapiro T, Pincus HA: Current status of research activity in American child and adolescent psychiatry: part II. A developmental analysis by age cohorts. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1991; 30: 1003–108

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Shapiro T, Mrazek D, Pincus HA: Current status of research activity in American child and adolescent psychiatry: part I. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1991; 30: 443–448

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Stubbe DE: Preparation for practice: child and adolescent psychiatry graduates’ assessment of training experiences. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2002; 41: 131–139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Palepu A, Friedman RH, Barnett RC, et al: Junior faculty members’ mentoring relationships and their professional development in U.S. medical schools. Acad Med 1998; 73: 318–323

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sciscione AC, Colmorgen GH, D’Alton ME: Factors affecting fellowship satisfaction, thesis completion, and career direction among maternal-fetal medicine fellows. Obstet Gynecol 1998; 91: 1023–106

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wingard DL, Garman KA, Reznik V: Facilitating faculty success: outcomes and cost benefit of the UCSD national center of leadership in academic medicine. Acad Med 2004; 79(suppl 10): S9–11

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tekian A, Jalovecky MJ, Hruska L: The impact of mentoring and advising at-risk underrepresented minority students on medical school performance. Acad Med 2001; 76: 1264

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Schlozman S, Althoff R, Caplan J, et al: Choosing a child and adolescent psychiatry residency. Acad Psychiatry 2006; 30: 248–256

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Osborn EH: Factors influencing students’ choices of primary care or other specialties. Acad Med 1993; 68: 572–574

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Williams LL, Levine JB, Malhotra S, et al: The good-enough mentoring relationship. Acad Psychiatry 2004; 28: 111–115

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bussey-Jones J, Bernstein L, Higgins S, et al: Repaving the road to academic success: the IMeRGE approach to peer mentoring. Acad Med 2006; 81: 674–679

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Cohen DJ: Research in child psychiatry: lines of personal, institutional, and career development, in Life Is with Others: Collected Papers on Child Psychiatry. Edited by Martin A, King RA. New Haven, Yale University Press, 2006, pp 225–241

    Google Scholar 

  18. Donald J. Cohen Fellows’ Remarks on the XVI Congress (2004). IACAPAP Bulletin XV Suppl. Available online at www.iacapap.org/bulletin

  19. Donald J. Cohen Fellows’ Remarks on the XVII Congress (2006). IACAPAP Bulletin XVIII Suppl. Available at www.iacapap.org

  20. Adler R, Martin A, Park C, et al: Mentoring young researchers: can the IACAPAP’s Donald J. Cohen Fellowships model be applicable and useful to Australasian psychiatry? Australasian Psychiatry 2007; 15: 232–236

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Murr AH, Miller C, Papadakis M: Mentorship through advisory colleges. Acad Med 2002; 77: 1172–113

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Barzansky B, Etzel SI: Educational programs in U.S. medical schools, 2004–2005. JAMA 2005; 294: 1068–1074

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ash AS, Carr PL, Goldstein R, et al: Compensation and advancement of women in academic medicine: is there equity? Ann Internal Med 2004; 141: 205–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. McGuire LK, Bergen MR, Polan ML: Career advancement for women faculty in a U.S. school of medicine: perceived needs. Acad Med 2004; 79: 319–325

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Turban DB, Dougherty TW: Role of protégé personality in receipt of mentoring and career success. Acad Manage J 1994; 37: 688–702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Rodenhauser P, Rudisill JR, Dvorak R: Skills for mentors and protégés applicable to psychiatry. Acad Psychiatry 2000; 24: 14–27

    Google Scholar 

  27. Martin A: Ignition sequence: on mentorship. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2005; 44: 1225–129

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrés Martin M.D., M.P.H..

Additional information

On behalf of all program participants, the authors express their deepest gratitude to the leadership of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and the International Association of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Allied Professions, and in particular to their respective presidents Drs. Thomas Anders and Myron Belfer, for their vision, support, and commitment to the initiatives described herein. The authors also acknowledge the invaluable assistance of Ms. Stacia Hall and the helpful comments from Drs. James F. Leckman, Joseph Rey, and Steven Schlozman on an earlier draft manuscript. Supported in part by the Klingenstein Third Generation Foundation and by Public Health Service grant 5R25 MH077823 (J.F. Leckman, P.I.)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Horner, M.S., Miller, S.M., Rettew, D.C. et al. Mentoring Increases Connectedness and Knowledge: A Cross-Sectional Evaluation of Two Programs in Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. Acad Psychiatry 32, 420–428 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ap.32.5.420

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ap.32.5.420

Keywords

Navigation