Assessment of Human Intraoral Thermal Sensitivity with Simple Devices in the Clinic: Implications for Orofacial Pain Conditions

Aims: To use simple thermal devices with different diameters and temperatures to investigate reliability and magnitude of human intraoral thermal sensitivity. Methods: Sixteen healthy volunteers participated. Six thermal devices with tapered circular ends (stimulus diameter 3, 5, and 10 mm) were used. Three different temperatures (room temperature, heat, and cold) were applied with each of the three diameters, ie, nine combinations. Participants were stimulated in randomized order at nine different sites: tongue, lip, maxillary attached gingiva adjacent to the left and right central incisors (without touching the lip) and to the left and right premolars (with or without touching the lip), and the left and right cheeks extraorally. Participants rated the perceived stimulus intensity on 0-50-100 numeric rating scales (NRS). The number of paradoxical thermal sensations was also recorded. Ten volunteers were examined twice on the same day and recalled for a second session for assessment with the 5-mm-diameter device of within- and between-session reliability (interclass correlation coefficients [ICC]). The results were analyzed using a three-way analysis of variance. Results: Reliability of NRS scores ranged from poor (ICC = 0.09, with cold stimulation at the premolar region) to excellent (ICC > 0.92, with cold stimulation at the cheek or tongue). NRS values varied with stimulus diameter (P < .050), temperature (P < .001), and sites (P < .001), with significant size × site and temperature × site interactions (P < .001). The tongue was the most sensitive site (P < .001) and the gingiva was the least sensitive site (P < .050). The 10-mm-diameter device produced higher NRS scores than the 3-mm-diameter device. Conclusion: The reliability of intraoral thermal sensitivity recorded with the 5-mm-diameter device varied greatly between different sites. Nonetheless, with this caveat in mind, the study did document that semiquantitative assessment of intraoral thermal sensitivity is feasible and applicable for clinical studies in different intraoral pain conditions.

intraoral; quantitative sensory testing; somatosensory sensitivity; thermal

1. Melis M, Lobo SL, Ceneviz C, et al. Atypical odontalgia: A re-view of the literature. Headache 2003;43:1060–1074.

2. Pigg M, Baad-Hansen L, Svensson P, Drangsholt M, List T. Reliability of intraoral quantitative sensory testing (QST). Pain 2010;148:220–226.

3. Geber C, Klein T, Rolke R, et al. Test/retest- and interobserv-erreliability in quantitative sensory testing according to the protocol on the German network on neuropathic pain (DFNS). Eur J Pain 2007;11:587.

4. Baad-Hansen L, Jensen TS, Svensson P. A human model of intraoral pain and heat hyperalgesia. J Orofac Pain 2003;17: 333–340.

5. Svensson P, Baad-Hansen L, Pigg M, et al. Guidelines and recommendations for assessment of somatosensory function in orofacial pain conditions: A taskforce report. J Oral Rehabil 2011;38:366–394.

6. Baad-Hansen L, List T, Jensen TS, Svensson P. Increased pain sensitivity to intraoral capsaicin in patients with atypical odontalgia. J Orofac Pain 2006;20:107–114.

7. Rolke R, Baron R, Maier C, et al. Quantitative sensory testing in the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain (DFNS): Standardized protocol and reference values. Pain 2006; 123:231–243.

8. Thygesen TH, Nørholt SE, Jensen J, Svensson P. Spatial and temporal assessment of orofacial somatosensory sensitivity: A methodological study. J Orofac Pain 2007;21:19–28.

9. Naganawa T, Iida T, Baad-Hansen L, Ando T, Svensson P. Application of a new palpometer for intraoral mechanical pain sensitivity assessment. J Orofac Pain 2013;27:336–342.

10. Jensen TS, Baron R. Translation of symptoms and sighs into mechanisms in neuropathic pain. Pain 2003;102:1–8.

11. Wasner GL, Brock JA. Determinants of thermal pain thresholds in normal subjects. Clin Neurophysiol 2008;119:2389–2395.

12. Defrin R, Sheraizin A Malichi L, Shachen O. Spatial summation and spatial discrimination of cold pain: Effect of spatial config-uration and skin type. Pain 2011;152:2739–2745.

13. Green BG, Zaharchuk R. Spatial variation in sensitivity as a factor in measurements of spatial summation of warmth and cold. Somatosens Mot Res 2001;18:181–190.

14. Defrin R, Givon R, Raz N, Urca G. Spatial summation and spatial discrimination of pain sensation. Pain 2006;126:123–131.

15. Price DD, McHaffie JG, Larson MA. Spatial summation of heat-induced pain: Influence of stimulus area and spatial separation of stimuli on perceived pain sensation intensity and unpleasantness. J Neurophysiol 1989;62:1270–1279.

16. Pigg M, Svensson P, List T. Orofacial thermal thresholds: Time-dependent variability and influence of spatial summation and test site. J Orofac Pain 2011;25:39–48.

17. Svensson P, Bjerring P, Arendt-Nielsen L, Nielsen JC, Kaaber S. Comparison of four laser types for experimental pain stimulation on oral mucosa and hairy skin. Lasers Surg Med 1991;11:313–324.

18. Svensson P, Bjerring P, Arendt-Nielsen L, Kaaber S. Quantitative determinations of sensory and pain thresholds on human oral mucosa by argon laser stimulation. Pain 1992; 49:233–239.

19. Stohler CS, Kowalski CJ. Spatial and temporal summation of sensory and affective dimensions of deep somatic pain. Pain 1999;79:165–173.

20. Susser E, Sprecher E, Yarnitsky D. Paradoxical heat sensation in healthy subject: Peripherally conducted by Aδ or C fibers?Brain 1999;122:239–246.

21. Fruhstorfer H, Detering I. A simple thermode for rapid temperature change. Pflugers Arch 1974;349:83–85.

22. Kenshalo DR, Bergen DC. A device to measure cutaneous temperature sensitivity in humans and subhuman species. J Appl Physiol 1975;39:1038–1040.

23. Morrow TJ, Casey KL. A contact thermal stimulator for neuro-behavioral research on temperature sensation. Brain Res Bull 1981;6:281–284.

24. Taylor JD, McGillis SL, Greenspan JD. Body site variation of heat pain sensitivity. Somatosens Mot Res 1993;10:455–465.

25. Nielsen J, Arendt-Nielsen L. Spatial summation of heat induced pain within and between dermatomes. Somatosens Mot Res 1997;14:119–125.

26. Baad-Hansen L, Pigg M, Ivanovic SE, et al. Intraoral somato-sensory abnormalities in patients with atypical odontalgia—A controlled multicenter quantitative sensory testing study. Pain 2013;154:1287–1294.

27. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 1979;86:420–428.

28. Cathcart S, Pritchard D. Reliability of pain threshold measurement in young adults. J Headache Pain 2006;7:21–26.

29. Meh D, Denislic M. Quantitative assessment of thermal and pain sensitivity. J Neurol Sci 1994;127:164–169.

30. Wasner GL, Brock JA. Determinants of thermal pain thresholds in normal subjects. Clin Neurophysiol 2008;119:2389–2395.

31. Heldestad V, Linder J, Sellersjö L, Nordh E. Reproducibility and influence of test modality order on thermal perception and thermal pain thresholds in quantitative sensory testing. Clin Neurophysiol 2010;121:1878–1885.

32. Verdugo R, Ochoa JL. Quantitative sensory thermotest. A key method for functional evaluation of small calibre afferent channels. Brain 1992;115:893–913.

33. Yarnitsky D. Quantitative sensory testing. Muscle Nerve 1997; 20:198–204.

34. Baron R, Wasner G. Quantitative thermotest—Investigations of thermal and nociceptive afferents in neuropathy. Is a multicentric approach useful to investigate rare painful neuropathies? Schmerz 1998;12:209–211.

35. Klein T, Magerl W, Rolke R, Treede RD. Human surrogate mod-els of neuropathic pain. Pain 2005;115:227–233.

36. Douglass DK, Carstens E, Watkins LR. Spatial summation in human thermal pain perception: Comparison with and between dermatomes. Pain 1992;50:197–202.

37. Price DD, Mchaffle JG, Larson MA. Spatial summation of heat-induced pain: Influence of stimulus area and spatial separation of stimuli on perceived pain sensation intensity and unpleasantness. J Neurophysiol 1989;62:1270–1279.

38. Hämäläinen H, Vartiainen M, Karvanen L, Järvilehto T. Paradoxical heat sensations During moderate cooling of the skin. Brain Res 1982;251:77–81.

39. Hansen C, Hopf HC, Treede RD. Paradoxical heat sensation in patients with multiple sclerosis. Evidence for a supraspinal integration of temperature sensation. Brain 1996;119:1729–1736.