Abelisauroidea (Theropoda, Dinosauria) from Africa: a review of the fossil record

Abstract The Continental African abelisauroid theropod dinosaur fossil record from the Jurassic-Cretaceous periods is becoming increasingly better understood, and offers great insight into the evolution and biogeography of this long-lived group of carnivores. Abelisauroidea is among the most familiar groups of theropod dinosaurs from Gondwana, with fossil records in South America, Australia, India and Africa, along with Europe. The objective of the present study is to review the fossil record of abelisauroids in continental Africa. Based on the literature and records from the online databases “The Paleobiology Database” and “The Theropod Database”, we review the distribution of these theropods in Africa and comment on their evolution. The African continent is a major region of importance when it comes to 26 Abelisauroidea fossil findings, including records of both major subdivisions of the clade: the Abelisauridae and Noasauridae families. The oldest Abelisauroidea fossil record found in Africa dates from the Late Jurassic, while the final records date from the end of the Cretaceous. This indicates that clade was the longest surviving lineage of the large theropods of Africa, and they filled a variety of ecological roles, including apex predators, at the end of the Cretaceous, when tyrannosaurids occupied similar niches in the northern continents.


INTRODUCTION
The Abelisauroidea -the group including the mid-to-large-bodied abelisaurids and the smaller, fast-running noasaurids -are among the most diverse and abundant carnivorous dinosaurs (Theropoda) from the Southern Hemisphere.Their fossils have been found in every modern continent that was once part of Gondwana, with a few records also in Europe (Le Loeuff & Buffetaut, 1991;Tortosa et al., 2014;Hendrickx & Mateus, 2014).The first fossils of abelisaurids from Continental Africa were found at the beginning of the 20 th century, and the noasaurid Elaphrosaurus from Tanzania was named as a new species in 1920 (Janensch, 1920), although it was not recognized as an abelisaur at the time (Rauhut & Carrano, 2016).Much later, Sereno et al. (1996) described and named the putative noasaurid Deltadromeus from Morocco, although it was also not recognized as an abelisaur at the time.Since then, many new fossils from Continental Africa have been discovered, and in the mid-2000s some of these were finally recognized as belonging to abelisaurs, particularly abelisaurids.These included the new species Rugops, Kryptops, Chenanisaurus, and Afromimus (Sereno et al., 2004;Sereno & Brusatte, 2008;Longrich et al., 2017: Sereno, 2017).Although the currently recognized diversity of African abelisaurid species is not as high as it is in South America (Bonaparte & Powell, 1980;Bonaparte & Novas, 1985;Bonaparte, 1985;Bonaparte, 1991;Coria & Salgado, 1998;Coria et al., 2002;Kellner & Campos, 2002;Calvo et al., 2004;Canale et al., 2009;Gianechini et al., 2015Gianechini et al., , 2021;;Filippi et al., 2016;Langer et al., 2019;Cerroni et al., 2020;Aranciaga-Rolando et al., 2021;Méndez et al., 2021;Ortiz David et al., 2021), Africa can now join South America as an area of particular importance for understanding abelisaur diversity and evolution, and thus for understanding what these theropods reveal about dinosaur evolution, distribution, and extinction more broadly.
Currently, records of abelisauroids in mainland Africa come from eight countries, with the largest collection from Morocco.Tunisia has so far yielded a small sample of teeth.The record in Libya consists of parts of vertebrae and part two fossils of legs.Egypt has produced only one tooth crown, and a femur that has been lost.Abelisauroids from Kenya and Zimbabwe have not yet been formally described, but the materials from Kenya are promising and may belong to two new taxa.From Niger, three species of unequivocal abelisauroid have been described, along with at least two problematic taxa.Africa's oldest abelisauroid records come from Middle Jurassic Tendaguru Formation from Tanzania (Fig. 2).
Madagascar also has yielded many records of Abelisauroidea, including two well-known species (Majungasaurus crenatissimus, Masiakasaurus knopfleri).We will not consider these records in this manuscript, instead focusing on fossils from continental Africa because they have not yet received a detailed review.
The holotype MNN GAD1-1 comprises a left maxilla with teeth.Sereno & Brusatte (2008) included several partial vertebrae and ribs (MNN GAD1-3 to GAD1-8) and an articulated pelvic girdle and sacrum (MNN GAD1-2) in the holotype specimen, but the postcrania was shown by Carrano et al. (2012) to belong to a non-abelisaurid theropod, most likely a carcharodontosaurid.We agree with this assessment.Therefore, these bones are no longer considered part of the Kryptops holotype.Sereno, Wilson & Conrad, 2004 -Rugops primus is from the Echkar Formation (Cenomanian), which outcrops near Abangharit, in the Republic of Niger.Rugops was described based on the specimen MNN IGU1, a partially complete cranium.Before the description of Rugops, abelisaurids were not clearly known from Africa, and it was often argued that they may have never lived on the continent.Rugops, therefore, was the first named species, and first well-preserved specimen, of a genuine abelisaurid described from continental Africa (Sereno et al., 2004).

Rugops primus
Afromimus tenerensis Sereno, 2017 -Afromimus comes from the Elrhaz Formation (Aptian-Albian), in the region of "Gadoufaoua", Ténéré Desert, Niger Republic.The holotype MNBH GAD112 is a fragmentary, possibly adult individual and includes a dorsal rib fragment, seven partial mid and distal caudal vertebrae, two partial chevrons, a tibia and incomplete fibula partially coossified with the astragalocalcaneum, and three partial pedal phalanges including an ungual.In the study that described Afromimus tenerensis Sereno (2017) originally identified it as an ornithomimosaur, a type of derived theropod more closely related to birds than were abelisaurids.However, Sereno (2017) also noted features in MNBH GAD112 that are shared with abelisauroids.Because on these resemblances, Cerroni et al. (2019) compared Afromimus with Abelisauroidea in detail and performed an extensive phylogenetic analysis.This resulted in the assignment of Afromimus to Abelisauroidea and possibly to Noasauridae, although its fragmentary condition precludes a confident referral to the latter family.
Undescribed abelisaur (Sereno et al., 2004) -This material is from the Elrhaz Formation (Aptian-Albian), in the region of "Gadoufaoua", in the western part of the Ténéré Desert, Republic of Niger.The specimen was reported as Figure 1.Abelisauroidea phylogeny (modified from Baiano et al., 2021).
an almost complete articulated skeleton, possibly one of the most complete noasaurids ever found (Sereno et al., 2004;Sereno & Brusatte, 2008;Sereno, 2010Sereno, , 2017;;Keillor, 2010).Although it has been mentioned in some papers and briefly described in abstracts and conference proceedings, it has yet to be formally described or named.Fanti et al. (2014) described a number of theropod teeth from the Tataouine Basin, but there is no precise information about the origin of each specimen.Nevertheless, it is known that these fossils were collected in the Oum ed Diab and Chenini Members (Aptian-Albian) of the Ain el Guettar Formation.The abelisauroid teeth from the Tatatouine Basin belong to five dental morphotypes: Morphotype 1 (2 teeth); Morphotype 2 (13 teeth); Morphotype 6 (9 teeth); Morphotype 7 (2 teeth); Morphotype 8 (4 teeth).

Morocco
Abelisauridae indet (Russell, 1996) -NMC 4186 is a fragment of right dentary without teeth.This bone was assigned to Majungasaurus sp. by Russell (1996), but the description does not clarify exactly what features are shared between the Moroccan specimen and M. crenatissimus from Madagascar.Therefore, we will treat NMC 41861 as Abelisauridae indet.The bone is from the Kem Kem beds of the Late Cretaceous (Cenomanian).There is incomplete information regarding the exact locality where this specimen was collected, and it possibly comes from southern Morocco.
Abelisauridae indet (Russell, 1996) -NMC 41859 is from the Cenomanian Kem Kem beds.There is little information about the exact locality where this material was collected and it probably comes from southern Morocco.This specimen is a fragment of a right dentary.
Abelisauroidea indet (Russell, 1996) -CMN 50811 is from the Cenomanian Kem Kem beds.The specimen is a centrum of a cervical vertebra, which is hourglass-shaped.It was initially described by Russell (1996) along with a second cervical vertebra (CMN 50810).
Both were referred to as "Bone 'Taxon' B", identified as an indeterminate small theropod.Recently, McFeeters (2013) revised these specimens and suggested that both cervical vertebrae of "Bone 'Taxon' B" belonged to two different individuals.Thus, CMN 50811 possibly belongs to an abelisaur closely related to noasaurids, and CMN 50810 is another theropod with uncertain phylogenetic affinities.Chiarenza & Cau (2016) suggested that another specimen, "Bone 'Taxon' C" CMN 50403 (Russell, 1996), shares affinities with the vertebral material of the indeterminate abelisauroid PRC.NF.1.21from Libya (see above; Smith et al., 2010).

Abelisauridae indet (Mahler, 2005)
-UCPC-10 is from the Kem Kem beds of the Upper Cretaceous (Cenomanian) and was collected by locals from the region of Erfoud, western Morocco.The material is a fragment of a right maxilla and according to Mahler (2005) exhibits characters that are diagnostic of Abelisauridae.Chenanisaurus barbaricus Longrich, Pereda-Suberbiola, Jalil, Khaldoune & Jourani, 2017 -The holotype of this species is from the region of Sidi Chennane.Although the specimen was not collected by the authors who described it, the pale white color of the bone and the color of the associated matrix are consistent with the preservation of other materials found in the Sidi Chennane locality.

Abelisauridae indet (
The specimens are described as coming from Couche III of the Ouled Abdoun Basin (Maastrichtian).Chenanisaurus was described based on the specimen OCP DEK-GE 772, an anterior fragment of the left dentary.In addition, there are two other specimens: OCP DEK-GE 457 and OCP DEK-GE 458, which are two well-preserved teeth.The well-preserved maxillary tooth WDC-CCPM-005 described by Buffetaut et al. (2005) likely comes from Couche III of the Ouled Abdoun Basin (Maastrichtian).This tooth was identified as belonging to an abelisaurid.Later, Longrich et al. (2017) indicated that this tooth belongs specifically to C. barbaricus.

Egypt
Abelisauridae indet.(Stromer & Weiler, 1930) -This specimen is a proximal portion of a tibia found in the Nubian Sandstone (Campanian) of Egypt.The tibia, which was destroyed in World War II, showed abelisaurian affinities (Buffetaut et al., 2005).
Abelisauridae indet.(Gemmellaro, 1921) -MGUP MEGA002 is a tooth crown from the Duwi Formation (Maastrichtian), which outcrops near Idfu, in the Nile Valley, Egypt.The specimen was originally referred (Gemmellaro, 1921) to "Megalosaurus" crenatissimus, an abelisaurid that is now well-known from the Late Cretaceous of Madagascar and is now called Majungasaurus crenatissimus (Krause et al., 2007).The Duwi specimen remained unmentioned for decades in the scientific literature.During the 1990s, this specimen was mentioned by Sampson et al. (1996) and more recently its phylogenetic affinities were evaluated, which supported the assignment of MEGA002 to Abelisauridae indet.(Smith & Lamanna, 2006).

Kenya
Undescribed Abelisauridae (Sertich et al., 2013)this record refers to a possible giant abelisaurid that was more than 11 meters long (Sertich et al., 2006(Sertich et al., , 2013)).The material includes part of a skull, and axial and appendicular skeleton elements.This theropod is from the Lapurr Mountains, in the sandstones referred to as the "Turkana Grits" (Maastrichtian), Kenya (Fig. 9).This potential new species has only been mentioned in conference abstracts and has yet to be fully described or named in the literature.A second taxon was also apparently found in the Lapurr Mountain, in the "Turkana Grits" sandstones (Maastrichtian) of Kenya (Sertich et al., 2006).However, there is, as of yet, no clear information about which specimens belong to this taxon.In the original report, the authors only comment that the "dental and axial materials suggest the presence of two abelisaurid theropods, a large one and another giant one".

Zimbabwe
Undescribed Abelisauroidea (Woolley et al., 2015) - Woolley et al. (2015) recently mentioned the existence of fossils (teeth and vertebrae) that would indicate the presence of at least one middle-sized abelisauroid taxon in the Gokwe Formation (Cretaceous) (Fig. 10), Zimbabwe.This specimen has only been mentioned in conference proceedings and has not yet been fully described or named in the literature.

Tanzania
Elaphrosaurus bambergi Janensch, 1920 -E.bambergi is from the Middle Dinosaur Member of the Tendaguru Formation (Kimmeridgian), that crops out north of Tendaguru Hill, Tanzania (Fig. 3).Elaphrosaurus was described based on a well-preserved postcranial skeleton.The holotype, MB R 4960, was described by Janensch (1920Janensch ( , 1925) ) and includes 16 presacral vertebrae, 6 sacral vertebrae, 18 caudal vertebrae, a middle caudal chevron, a left humerus, both ilia, the left pubis, both ischia, the left femur, a tibia, a fibula, an astragalus-calcaneum, the left metatarsals II and III, the proximal part of metatarsal IV, and three pedal phalanges.Rauhut & Carrano (2016) reviewed the material described by Janensch (1929) and pointed out that Janensch described a left and a right scapulocoracoid, a right metacarpal II, and a left metacarpal IV (HMN R dd 4960.35,4960.36)that were found in the same locality as the holotype and, therefore, most likely belonged to the same individual.Thus, Rauhut & Carrano (2016) suggested that this material should be included as part of the holotype of Elaphrosaurus, a suggestion made by Sereno (2004) and Carrano & Sampson (2008) as well.
?Abelisauridae indet (Janensch, 1925) -MB.R.3625 is a left tibia from the Middle Dinosaur Member of the Tendaguru Formation (Kimmeridgian).Rauhut (2011) suggested that this fossil is possibly from an abelisaurid.
Abelisauroidea indet (Janensch, 1925) -MB.R.1750 is a tibia described by Janensch (1925) as "Coelurosaurier B".Rauhut (2005) reviewed this fossil and indicated that it likely belonged to a small abelisauroid.The specimen is from the St locality from the Middle Dinosaur Member (Kimmeridgian) of Tendaguru, Tanzania.Upper Dinosaur Member (Tithonian) of the Tendaguru Formation.Janensch (1925) indicated that this fossil shows ceratosaurian characters.Recently, a review of this specimen (among others) argued that it has abelisaurian affinities (Rauhut, 2011).
Abelisauroidea indet (Janensch, 1925) -MB.R.1751 is a tibia described by Janensch (1925) as "Coelurosaurier C".Rauhut (2005) reviewed the material and suggested that it might belong to a small abelisauroid.The specimen was found in the locality from the Upper Dinosaur Member (Tithonian/Berriasian) of Tendaguru, Tanzania.

Problematic taxa
Berberosaurus liassicus Allain, Tykoski, Aquesbi, Jalil & Monbaron, 2007 -B.liassicus is from the upper layers of the continental series of Toundoute, which is Early Jurassic (Pliensbachian-Toarcian) in age, in the region of Douar de Tazouda, near the Toundoute village, High Atlas, Ouarzazate Province, Morocco.Berberosaurus was described based on postcranial material that includes a cervical vertebra (MHNM-Pt9), the anterior part of a sacrum (MHNM-Pt23), a second left metacarpal (MHNM-Pt22), a right femur (MHNM-Pt19), the proximal end of a left tibia (MHNM-Pt21), the distal end of a right tibia (MHNM-Pt16), and a left fibula (MHNM-Pt20).Allain et al. (2007) considered B. liassicus to be a basal abelisauroid.The authors also indicated that the material shows some affinities with Noasauridae.However, later studies suggested that this theropod was a basal ceratosaur (Carrano & Sampson, 2008;Ezcurra et al., 2010).A more recent study (Rauhut & Carrano, 2016) presented two main hypotheses regarding this taxon: B. liassicus may be a basal ceratosaur or a member of the more derived Ceratosauridae.
Deltadromeus agilis Sereno, Dutheil, Larochene, Larsson, Lyon, Magwene, Sidor, Varricchio & Wilson, 1996 -This taxon was collected in the Kem Kem region, southeastern Morocco, and was found in the lower layers (Cenomanian) of the Kem Kem beds.The holotype, SGM Din-2, is an incomplete postcranial skeleton that includes at least a cervical rib, anterior dorsal neural arches, two dorsal ribs, two gastralia, four anterior caudal neural spines, eighteen middle to posterior caudal vertebrae, five chevrons, partial scapulocoracoid, humerus, proximal radius, proximal ulna, an impression of part of a left iliac lamina, ischial shaft, fused distal ischia, a right femur, a right proximal tibia, a right distal tibia with the tarsus, a left fibula, left metatarsals II-IV, metatarsal V, and several pedal phalanges.
In the study that described this taxon, Sereno et al. (1996) included a small phylogenetic analysis which placed D. agilis as a coelurosaur.Later, D. agilis was recovered as sister to Ornithomimosauria (Rauhut, 2000(Rauhut, , 2003)).Other studies placed this taxon in Ceratosauria (Carrano & Sampson, 2002;Sereno et al., 2004;Carrano & Sampson, 2008;Pol & Rauhut, 2012).However, after a recent review of E. bambergi, together with other information, D. agilis was assigned to Noasauridae (Tortosa et al., 2014;Rauhut & Carrano, 2016).Apesteguía et al. (2016), on the other hand, recovered Deltradomeus as a basal carcharodontosaur.Thus, the phylogenetic position of this taxon is still debated.(Lapparent, 1960) Sereno, Wilson & Conrad, 2004 -S.gautieri has a controversial history.Lapparent (1960) described two series of fossils from Tedreft, one a lot of probably unassociated (Carrano & Sampson, 2008) remains and the other an associated skeleton, as the new species Elaphrosaurus gautieri.As noted by Rauhut & Carrano (2016), these are all catalogued as syntypes under the number MNHN 1961-28.The incomplete description and illustration by Lapparent makes it difficult to know which elements belonged to the supposedly associated skeleton, and Carrano & Sampson further state some of the material cannot be located.Sereno et al. (2004) chose a mid-cervical from the unassociated lot (plate XI, fig. 5 in Lapparent) as the holotype, though Rauhut & Carrano noted this did not count as a formal lectotype designation under ICZN rules.Regardless, Sereno et al. proceeded to refer new specimen MNN TIG6 (an articulated axial column preserving the third cervical to the anterior sacrals with complete cervical and fragmentary dorsal ribs) to the species and made it the type of the new genus Spinostropheus.MNHN 1961-28 was found in Tedreft 250 km northwest of Agadez, while MNN TIG6 was found in Fako 100 km southwest of Agadez.Both specimens were found in to the Tiourarén Formation (Bathonian), which outcrops in Niger.A proximal metatarsal from the younger Continental Intercalaire was also assigned to the species by Lapparent; however, as this specimen is fragmentary and cannot clearly be assigned to S. gautieri, were do not consider it further.Sereno et al. (2004) scored MNN TIG6 in their phylogenetic analysis and recovered it as a basal abelisauroid, while Carrano & Sampson (2008) scored the syntype material and MNN TIG6 and recovered it to be a basal ceratosaur.Most recently, Wang et al. (2017) included both specimens and recovered the OTU as a noasaurid.However, while Carrano & Sampson believed the mid cervical and at least one tibia are ceratosaur-like, Rauhut & Carrano (2016) stated it lacked synapomorphies of Ceratosauria and could belong to Tetanurae instead.They provided several differences from Elaphrosaurus, supporting the use of Spinostropheus for MNHN 1961-28, but stated it was quite different from MNN TIG6, so removed the latter specimen from the hypodigm.
The phylogenetic position of the problematic taxon B. liassicus is still debated among researchers (Allain et al., 2007;Carrano & Sampson, 2008;Ezcurra et al., 2010;Rauhut & Carrano, 2016).Supposing that this theropod is a basal member of Abelisauroidea or a ceratosaur with abelisauroid affinities, this would be the oldest record of this lineage in Africa, dating back to the Early Jurassic (Allain et al., 2007).
Once the phylogenetic affinities of Elaphrosaurus and Berberosaurus and their relationships with Abelisauroidea are better understood, these taxa will provide key information regarding the origin of the group.In particular, they have bearing on the hypothesis that Abelisauroidea began to diversify early in the Jurassic and split into Abelisauridae and Noasauridae during the Middle Jurassic (Allain et al., 2007;Pol & Rauhut, 2012;Rauhut & Carrano, 2016).An earlier diversification of Abelisauroidea is also indicated by the appendicular specimens of Tanzania, the tibia MB R 3626 and the femur MB R 3621, both described by Janensch (1925) and assigned to Abelisauridae by Rauhut (2011).The material dates to the end of the Jurassic (Tithonian) and is the oldest Abelisauridae record from Africa.Together with E. bambergi, MB R 3626 and MB R 3621 also support the hypothesis that an African Abelisauroidea fauna formed by two families (Abelisauridae and Noasauridae) was established before the end of the Jurassic.
The fossil record of continental African Abelisauroidea has a great hiatus, spanning from the end of the Late Jurassic (Tithonian) to the end of the Early Cretaceous (Fig. 2).This most likely represents poor sampling, not genuine absence, seeing as we know that abelisauroids persisted until the end of the Cretaceous.After the hiatus, abelisauroids reappear in the Aptian-Albian fossil record of Africa.Kryptops palaios is a basal member of Abelisauridae (Sereno & Brusatte, 2008;Rauhut & Carrano, 2016;Longrich et al., 2017).However, Kryptops is not the only abelisauroid record from the Aptian-Albian.In the same unit where Kryptops was found, in the Elrhaz Formation, Niger, another abelisauroid theropod was also discovered.The specimen has not yet been described, but it is possibly the most complete noasaurid known to date (Sereno et al., 2004;Sereno & Brusatte, 2008;Sereno, 2010;Keillor, 2010).In addition to the material During the Aptian-Albian of Africa, the Abelisauroidea was firmly established as one of the three main groups of medium to large-sized theropods.Along with abelisauroids, this so-called triumvirate of large carnivores also included carcharodontosaurids and spinosaurids (Brusatte & Sereno, 2008).This paleoecological grouping possibly had an earlier origin, but the first quality records of all three groups appearing together occur in the Aptian-Albian.This triumvirate of large theropods remained in Africa until at least the Campanian, and were also present together in other parts of Gondwana during the Mid-Late Cretaceous, particularly South America.
An abundance of abelisauroid fossils is also observed in the Cenomanian of Africa, as demonstrated by the abelisaurid Rugops primus from the Echkar Formation and the potential noasaurids Afromimus and Deltadromeus agilis.These taxa exemplify the evolutionary success of Abelisauroidea during the beginning of the Late Cretaceous.The Kem Kem Formation in Morocco also has yielded many other Cenomanian records: abelisaurid specimens NMC 4186 (Majungasaurus sp. in Russell, 1996), NMC 41859, UCPC -10, MPUR NS153-1, MPUR NS153-2, and OLPH 025, the noasaurid ROM 64666, the abelisaurs CMN 50811, MHNM KK04 and MPCM 13573, and the three teeth with abelisaurid affinities described by Richter et al. (2013).
A decline in the fossil richness of abelisaurids is observed towards the end of the Late Cretaceous, although this also may be an artifact of sampling rather than a genuine taxonomic signal.Indeed, until recently, little was known about the Abelisauroidea from this age, as latest Cretaceous dinosaur-bearing rocks are rare in Africa.There is only one record from the Campanian, a fragment of a tibia (possibly from an abelisauroidoid) that was collected in the Nubian Sandstone of Egypt.This fossil was described by Stromer & Weiler (1930) but was destroyed.Until a few years ago, there was little information about abelisauroids from the Maastrichtian of Africa.The fossil record was limited to a single tooth from the phosphates of the Ouled Abdoun Formation, Morocco (Buffetaut et al., 2005).This material was recently redescribed by Longrich et al. (2017) and assigned to their new taxon Chenanisaurus barbaricus, and is the first abelisaurid named and comprehensively described from the Maastrichtian of Africa.It is possible that two other records from the end of the Cretaceous of Africa may also belong to abelisauroids.These specimens were collected in the Turkana Grits Formation, Kenya, but have not yet been described.The fossils could belong to two taxa: one gigantic abelisaurid and another large-size taxon (Sertich et al., 2006;Sertich et al., 2013).
Abelisaurids have also been reported from the Maastrichtian of South America, along with potentially carcharodontosaurids (Candeiro et al., 2004(Candeiro et al., , 2006(Candeiro et al., , 2012;;Azevedo et al., 2013;Delcourt & Grillo, 2018).Carcharodontosaurids may have also been present in the Maastrichtian of Africa, but are currently unsampled because there are few places to find fossils of this age in Africa.But, based on the current fossil record, we can hypothesize that the Abelisauridae were the last group of large theropods to inhabit Africa.This would mean that abelisauroids were the longest surviving lineage of large-bodied theropods in Africa (Fig. 11).It is also noteworthy that abelisauroids may have evolved giant size at the very end of the Cretaceous in Africa, at the same time that colossal tyrannosaurids like Tyrannosaurus and Tarbosaurus had ascended to the apex predator role in North America and Asia.Abelisauroids also occupied the large-bodied predator role into the Maastrichtian in South America (Novas, 2013), although it may be that the African taxa were even larger-bodied, if the records from Kenya are verified.

CONCLUSION
Abelisauroidea were a major group of small-to-largebodied theropods that lived on Africa during at least the last half of the Mesozoic, from the Late Jurassic until the end of the Cretaceous.Although the African abelisauroid fossils are not as abundant as those from South America, and although the first unequivocal records of abelisauroids on Africa were recognized only in the early 2000s, we can now recognize Africa as not just an important region for abelisauroid fossils, but the region with the second most diverse record of these theropods, after South America.The African fossil record includes two families (Abelisauridae and Noasauridae), into which are assigned five genera (Afromimus, Chenanisaurus, Rugops, Kryptops, and Elaphrosaurus) that are currently considered valid.Further research may elucidate the affinities of the problematic taxa Deltadromeus agilis and Berberosaurus liassicus and future formal descriptions of the materials from Kenya and Niger may increase the number of Abelisauroidea fossils in Africa.
The abelisauroids from Africa were part of the great dispersal and evolution of this group, which began at the end of the Jurassic and ended at the end of the Cretaceous.The oldest abelisauroid fossils from Africa were discovered in Tanzania and date from the end of the Jurassic (Kimmeridgian).If we consider the records from Tanzania with the specimens of Ozraptor (a possible Australian abelisauroid from the Middle Jurassic), Eoabelisaurus (a possible abelisauroid from the Middle Jurassic of South America), CCG 20011 (a noasaurid originally referred to Chuandongocoelurus from the Middle Jurassic of China) and Limusaurus (a noasaurid recorded in the Upper Jurassic of China), it is clear that -regardless of their center of origin -abelisauroids began to evolve and disperse very early.The first appearance of Abelisauroidea possibly occurred during the Early Jurassic, because fossils indicate that abelisauroids already inhabited different regions of Gondwana in the Middle Jurassic.Furthermore, Abelisauridae indet (Fanti et al., 2014) -MGGC 21889 is a fragment of a left dentary without associated teeth.The fossil comes from the Oum ed Diab Member (Aptian-Albian) of the Ain el Guettar Formation, which crops out in the Tataouine Basin in southern Tunisia.Abelisauridae indet (Fanti et al., 2014) -ONM TM 02 is a small fragment of a left dentary without associated teeth.The material is from the Oum ed Diab Member (Aptian-Albian) of the Ain el Guettar Formation, which crops out in the Tataouine Basin in southern Tunisia.Abelisauroidea indet (Fanti et al., 2014) -Recently, Abelisauroidea indet (Smith et al., 2010) -PRC.NF.1.21includes two incomplete dorsal vertebrae, a centrum of a proximal caudal vertebra, the caudal part of a neural arch, the distal part of a right femur, and a well preserved right tibia.The fossils are from the town of Nalut, in Libya, about 30 km east of the border with Tunisia, where the Cabao Formation (Aptian) crops out.

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. Map of the Continental Africa and Arabian Peninsula and the African countries that have abelisaur records.
Porchetti et al., 2011) -The specimens MPUR NS153-1 and MPUR NS153-2 are from the Cenomanian Kem Kem beds and were found in Hammada des Kem Kem, next to the Begaa village, about 10 km northeast of Taouz, Morocco.Both specimens are incomplete main bodies of left maxillae.Abelisauridae indet.(Chiarenza & Cau, 2016) -OLPH 025 is from the Cenomanian Kem Kem beds and was collected next to the Moroccan-Algerian border, in southern Taouz, Errachidia Province, in the region of Meknès-Tafilalt, Morocco.The fossil is a proximal portion of a right femur.Noasauridae indet.(Evans et al., 2015) -ROM 64666 is from the Cenomanian Kem Kem beds and was collected next to Jebel Beg'aa (southeast Taouz, Errachidia Province), in the region of Meknès-Tafilalt, Morocco.The specimen is an almost complete and well-preserved left femur, in which only small parts of the proximal and distal ends are worn by abrasion.Abelisauroidea indet (Novas et al., 2005) -MPCM 13573 is from the Cenomanian Kem Kem beds.It possibly comes from the region of Tafilalt, in the northern region of the Sahara Desert, Morocco.The specimen is an ungual phalanx, probably from the fourth digit of the left foot.Abelisauridae indet (Richter et al., 2013) -The specimens NMB-1672-R, GZG.V.19996, and GZG.V.19999 are three well-preserved teeth from the Cenomanian Kem Kem beds of Morocco.In a recent study, Richter et al. (2013) found that these specimens closely resemble abelisaur teeth.Abelisauroidea indet.(Zitouni et al., 2019) -This fossil was found in the Aferdou region, near the locality of Gara Sbaâ, and belongs the Kem Kem Beds (Cenomanian) of Morocco.The specimen MHNM KK04 is a highly fractured and fragile right ilium.

Table 1 .
Fossil records of Abelisauroidea in Africa.
Fanti et al. (2014)ssils of Aptian-Albian abelisauroids from many other parts of north Africa, which indicates that the group was diverse and occupied a large area at the time.These include specimens from Libya (MPCM 13693 and PRC.NF.1.2) and Tunisia (MGGC 21889, ONM TM 02, and several teeth with Abelisauroidea affinities described byFanti et al. (2014). from