Phonetica was published by Karger Publishers up to and including 2020. If you or your institution subscribed to Phonetica during that period, you might still have access to the full text of this article on the Karger platform if you cannot access it here.
Abstract
The Estonian language with its elaborate system of contrasts in quantity, whose essentials are described in the paper, is used to investigate human perception of distinctive contrasts in the duration of vowels, consonants and larger units. In the experiments reported, the speaking rate of a preceding or following syllable was manipulated in addition to that of a target V, C or VC sequence that carried a quantity distinction in disyllabic words. The results confirmed that the second syllable in such words, in particular the duration of its vowel, serves as a reference, but they showed segments of additional syllables to contribute in the same direction. The results provided no support for ascribing quantity to any larger units than phonetic segments. Speech rate effects of similar magnitude have been observed in Japanese, while effects of the same kind were found to be smaller in Dutch. These differences may be linked with the functions durational contrasts have in the different languages. It appears that listeners have to adapt more fully to variations in the local speaking rate when there are no additional cues and the functional load of quantity distinctions is high.
verified
References
1 Dommelen, W. A. van: Auditory accounts of temporal factors in the perception of Norwegian disyllables and speech analogs. J. Phon. 27: 107–123 (1999).10.1006/jpho.1999.0087Search in Google Scholar
2 Eek, A.: Observations on the durations of some word structures. I. Estonian Papers Phonet., pp. 18–37 (Academy of Sciences of the Estonian SSR, Tallinn 1974).Search in Google Scholar
3 Eek, A.: Observations on the durations of some word structures. II. Estonian Papers Phonet., pp. 7–54 (Academy of Sciences of the Estonian SSR, Tallinn 1975).Search in Google Scholar
4 Eek, A.: Further information on the perception of Estonian quantity. Estonian Papers Phonet., pp. 31–56 (Academy of Sciences of the Estonian SSR, Tallinn 1980).Search in Google Scholar
5 Eek, A.: Units of temporal organization and word accents in Estonian. Linguistica Uralica 26: 251–263 (1990).Search in Google Scholar
6 Eek, A.; Meister, E.: Simple perception experiments on Estonian word prosody; in Lehiste, Ross, Estonian prosody: papers from a symposium, pp. 71–99 (Institute of Estonian Language and Authors, Tallinn 1997).Search in Google Scholar
7 Engstrand, O.; Krull, D.: Durational correlates of quantity in Swedish, Finnish and Estonian: cross-language evidence for a theory of adaptive dispersion. Phonetica 51: 80–91 (1994).10.1159/000261960Search in Google Scholar
8 Fox, R.; Lehiste, I.: Discrimination of duration ratios in bisyllabic tokens by native English and Estonian listeners. J. Phon. 17: 167–174 (1989).10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30427-9Search in Google Scholar
9 Fujisaki, H.; Nakamura, K.; Imoto, T.: Auditory perception of duration of speech and non-speech stimuli; in Fant, Tatham, Auditory analysis and perception of speech, pp. 197–219 (Academic Press, London, 1975).Search in Google Scholar
10 Krull, D.: Word-prosodic features in Estonian conversational speech: some preliminary results. Proc. ASCA Workshop on Prosody, Working Papers, vol. 41, pp. 148–151 (Department of Linguistics, Lund University 1993).Search in Google Scholar
11 Krull, D.: Perception of Estonian word prosody in whispered speech, in van Dommelen, Fretheim, Nordic prosody. Proc. 8th Conf., pp. 153–164 (Lang, Frankfurt am Main, 2000).Search in Google Scholar
12 Krull, D.; Traunmüller, H.: Perception of quantity in Estonian. Proc. Fonetik 2000, pp. 85–88 (Department of Languages, University of Skövde, 2000).Search in Google Scholar
13 Lehiste, I.: Segmental and syllabic quantity in Estonian. Am. Stud. Uralic Ling., vol. 1 (Indiana University, Bloomington 1960).Search in Google Scholar
14 Lehiste, I.: The function of length in Finnish and Estonian. Language 41: 447–456 (1965).10.2307/411787Search in Google Scholar
15 Lehiste, I.: Experiments with synthetic speech concerning quantity in Estonian; in Hallap, Congressus Tertius Internationalis Fenno-Ugristarum Tallinnae habitus 17–23, VIII, 1970, pars I: Acta linguistica, pp. 254–269 (Valgus, Tallinn 1975).Search in Google Scholar
16 Lehiste, I.: Current debates concerning Estonian quantity. FUSAC ’88, Proc. 6th Ann. Meet. Fenno-Ugric Stud. Ass. Canada, pp. 77–86 (University Press of America, Lanham 1989).Search in Google Scholar
17 Lehiste, I.: Search for phonetic correlates in Estonian prosody; in Lehiste, Ross, Estonian prosody: papers from a symposium, pp. 11–33 (Institute of Estonian Language, Tallinn 1997).Search in Google Scholar
18 Lehiste, I.; Danforth, D.G.: Foneettisten vihjeiden hierarkia viron kvantiteetin havaitsemisessa (Summary: The hierarchy of phonetic cues in the perception of Estonian quantity). Eripainos Virittajasta 4: 404–411 (1977).Search in Google Scholar
19 Liiv, G.: On the quantity and quality of Estonian vowels of three phonological degrees of length. Proc. 4th Int. Congr. Phonet. Sci., pp. 683–687 (The Hague 1962).Search in Google Scholar
20 Miller, J.L.; Dexter, R.R.: Effects of speaking rate and lexical status on phonetic perception. J. exp. Psychol. hum. Percept. Perform. 14: 369–378 (1988).10.1037/0096-1523.14.3.369Search in Google Scholar
21 Miller, J.L.; Liberman, A.M.: Some effects of later-occurring information on the perception of stop consonant and semivowel. Percept. Psychophys. 25: 457–465 (1979).10.3758/BF03213823Search in Google Scholar
22 Nooteboom, S.G.: Speech rate and segmental perception or the role of words in phoneme identification; in Myers, Laver, Anderson, The cognitive representation of speech, pp. 143–150 (North-Holland, Amsterdam 1981).10.1016/S0166-4115(08)60188-0Search in Google Scholar
23 Nooteboom, S.G.; Brokx, J.P.L.; de Rooij, J.J.: Contributions of prosody to speech perception; in Levelt, Flores d’Arcais: Studies in the perception of language, pp. 75–107 (Wiley, Chichester 1978).Search in Google Scholar
24 ÕS 1999: eesti keele sõnaraamat. Erelt, T. ed. (Eesti Keele Sihtasutus, Tallinn 1999).Search in Google Scholar
25 Pickett, J.M.; Decker, L.R.: Time factors in the perception of a double consonant. Lang. Speech 3: 11–17 (1960).10.1177/002383096000300103Search in Google Scholar
26 Saareste, A.: Eesti keele mõisteline sõnaraamat (Dictionnaire analogique de la langue estonienne), vol. 2 (Vaba Eesti, Stockholm 1968), accessible on the Web: http://www.eki.ee/dict/saareste/.Search in Google Scholar
27 Summerfield, Q.; Haggard, M.P.: Speech rate effects in perception of voicing. Speech Synthesis Percept., Rep. Speech Res. Progr., vol. 6, pp. 1–12 (Department of Psychology, The Queen’s University of Belfast 1972).Search in Google Scholar
28 Tauli, V.: On quantity and stress in Estonian. Acta ling. Hafnensia 9: 145–162 (1966).10.1080/03740463.1966.10411446Search in Google Scholar
29 Traunmüller, H.: Conventional, biological, and environmental factors in speech communication: a modulation theory. Phonetica 51: 170–183 (1994).Search in Google Scholar
30 Trubetzkoy, N.S.: Grundzüge der Phonologie. Travaux du cercle linguistique de Prague 7 (1939).Search in Google Scholar
© 2003 S. Karger AG, Basel
