The Interplay between Immune System and Microbiota in Diabetes

Moffa, Simona; Mezza, Teresa; Cefalo, Chiara M. A.; Cinti, Francesca; Impronta, Flavia; Sorice, Gian Pio; Santoro, Antonio; Di Giuseppe, Gianfranco; Pontecorvi, Alfredo; Giaccari, Andrea

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/9367404

Mediators of Inflammation

On this page

Abstract Introduction Conclusions Conflicts of Interest Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Special Issue

The Microbiota and Immune System Crosstalk in Health and Disease 2019

View this Special Issue

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2019 | Article ID 9367404 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/9367404

The Interplay between Immune System and Microbiota in Diabetes

Simona Moffa,¹Teresa Mezza,¹Chiara M. A. Cefalo,¹Francesca Cinti,¹Flavia Impronta,¹Gian Pio Sorice,¹Antonio Santoro,¹Gianfranco Di Giuseppe,¹Alfredo Pontecorvi,¹and Andrea Giaccari¹

Guest Editor: Jorg Fritz

Received02 Sept 2019

Accepted03 Dec 2019

Published30 Dec 2019

Abstract

Diabetes is not a single and homogeneous disease, but a cluster of metabolic diseases characterized by the common feature of hyperglycemia. The pathogenesis of type 1 diabetes (T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) (and all other intermediate forms of diabetes) involves the immune system, in terms of inflammation and autoimmunity. The past decades have seen an increase in all types of diabetes, accompanied by changes in eating habits and consequently a structural evolution of gut microbiota. It is likely that all these events could be related and that gut microbiota alterations might be involved in the immunomodulation of diabetes. Thus, gut microbiota seems to have a direct, even causative role in mediating connections between the environment, food intake, and chronic disease. As many conditions that increase the risk of diabetes modulate gut microbiota composition, it is likely that immune-mediated reactions, induced by alterations in the composition of the microbiota, can act as facilitators for the onset of diabetes in predisposed subjects. In this review, we summarize recent evidence in the field of gut microbiota and the role of the latter in modulating the immune reactions involved in the pathogenesis of diabetes.

1. Introduction

Diabetes can be described as a cluster of metabolic diseases characterized by the common feature of hyperglycemia. However, it is not a single and homogeneous disease and is therefore difficult to classify.

In the past, it was categorized on the basis of age at diagnosis and the need for insulin therapy. The latest pathogenetic [1] classification identifies four forms of diabetes; in particular, the subdivision into type 1 (T1D) and type 2 (T2D) diabetes was introduced to replace insulin-dependent and noninsulin-dependent diabetes.

T1D is the most common metabolic disorder in children and young adults, and is due to a progressive autoimmune or idiopathic β-cell destruction, with the end result of absolute insulin deficiency. It is a multifactorial disease, in which a genetic predisposition, combined with a triggering event, initiates the activation of self-reactive lymphocytes. Although in the early stages the disease is clinically silent, it is already possible to detect autoantibodies directed against β-cell antigens. Several factors have been hypothesized to contribute to T1D onset, including chemicals, viruses, commensal bacteria, and diet. T2D, on the other hand, most commonly occurs in adulthood, against a background of obesity and insulin resistance. It is characterized by an initial phase of compensatory hyperinsulinemia, creating an overload for pancreatic β-cells, leading to a progressive loss of insulin secretive function, and consequently to hyperglycemia.

However, several studies have shown that this subdivision does not accurately describe some intermediate forms of diabetes, with overlapping features [2]. It is increasingly common to see obese young people with metabolic characteristics of T2D with autoantibodies for β-cells typical of T1D now defined as “double diabetes” or type 1.5 diabetes [3]. Moreover, there is another well-known type of diabetes, called Latent Autoimmune Diabetes in Adults (LADA), which shares mechanisms belonging to the two abovementioned diseases: a progressive reduction in insulin secretion due to autoimmune destruction of β-cells and, although to a lesser extent than in T2D, insulin resistance.

Over the past decades, there has been an increase in all forms of diabetes, accompanied by changes in eating habits and consequently a structural evolution of gut microbiota [4]. It is likely that all these events could be related and that gut microbiota alterations might be involved in the immunomodulation of diabetes.

Immunomediated pathogenesis is a common feature of almost all forms of diabetes, in terms of inflammation and/or autoimmunity. On the other hand, alterations of gut microbiota seem to be linked to several immune-driven inflammatory diseases [5–7]. These observations have led researchers to hypothesize a possible link between diabetes onset and gut microbiota alterations.

Against this complex background, recent studies have shown that the development of diabetes is closely related to alterations of gut microbiota, an important “organ” consisting of bacteria, viruses, protozoa, and fungi living in the gastroenteric tube [8]. The microbiota provides protection against pathogenic microbes by maintaining local intestinal integrity and regulating intestinal barrier permeability.

All this is possible thanks to a symbiotic relationship favored by the balance between gut microbiota, intestinal epithelial cells, and the mucosal immune system [9]. The disruption of this equilibrium, called dysbiosis, seems to be involved not only in the pathogenesis of several intestinal diseases, such as inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) [10], celiac disease, irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), and colorectal cancer [11], but also in metabolic diseases including obesity, metabolic syndrome, and diabetes [12, 13]. Recently, intestinal microbiota composition has been shown to play a role in obesity [14] and diabetes [15], but the exact molecular mechanisms through which a given intestinal microbiota induces metabolic diseases still need to be clarified. In the case of T2D, increased energy harvesting and the triggering of a low-grade inflammatory status in insulin resistance and obesity [16] are two of the possible mechanisms involved. Therefore, recent studies also suggest that gut microbiota contributes to the risk of developing T1D in genetically predisposed individuals; indeed, environmental factors that may affect the risk of developing T1D, including birth delivery mode [17], diet in early life [18], and possibly the use of antibiotics [19], are all related to the intestine and its microbiota.

Thus, gut microbiota seems to have a direct, even causative role in mediating connections between the environment, food intake, and chronic disease. Whereas many conditions that increase the risk of diabetes modulate gut microbiota composition, it is likely that immune-mediated reactions induced by alterations in the composition of the microbiota can act as facilitators of the onset of diabetes in predisposed subjects.

In this review, we will summarize the recent evidence in the field of gut microbiota and the role of the latter in modulating immune reactions involved in the pathogenesis of diabetes.

2. Gut Microbiota Composition in Diabetes

Intestinal microbiota is made up of five dominant bacterial phyla: Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Actinobacteria, Proteobacteria, and Verrucomicrobia [20]. In particular, Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes are the main bacterial phyla known to be correlated with obesity and T2D. The Firmicutes phylum is composed of Ruminococcus, Clostridium, Lactobacillus, and butyrate-producing bacteria, while the Bacteroidetes phylum consists of Bacteroides, Prevotella, and Xylanibacter [20].

Human and animal studies have been used to demonstrate that gut microbiota composition is altered in diabetes. Comparing the gut microbiota of lean mice and mice with diet-induced obesity, some authors found an increase in the abundance of Firmicutes associated with diet-induced obesity [21]. These observations were supported by the identification of an increase in the Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio in ob/ob mice and in mice fed a high-fat diet compared with lean mice. Furthermore, this increase was more significant in the high-fat diet-fed mice than in the ob/ob mice [22].

Other studies have also demonstrated a strong connection between T2D and changes in the composition of gut microbiota. A study conducted on diabetic patients compared to nondiabetic controls showed that the proportions of phylum Firmicutes and class Clostridia were significantly reduced in the diabetic group compared to the control group, while there was a greater quantity of Bacteroidetes and Proteobacteria. Consequently, the ratios of Bacteroidetes to Firmicutes were found to be significantly and positively correlated with reduced glucose tolerance [15].

In humans, however, there are still doubts as to whether the state of intestinal microbiota is the consequence or the cause of the altered metabolic condition. To clarify this, studies using germ-free mice have demonstrated the central role of intestinal microbiota in triggering metabolic impairments, even though it remains to be demonstrated whether genetic background can influence the development of a specific microbiota.

Diet is one of the main determinants of intestinal microbiota composition and an extremely important causal factor in the development of T2D. Turnbaugh et al., for example, have shown that microbiome structure is rapidly altered in response to a switch from a low-fat, plant polysaccharide-rich diet to a high-fat, high-sugar “Western” diet [23].

In the last decades, human food habits have changed, with fats being preferred over fibers; thus, gut microbiota has changed in response to the new feeding habits. It has therefore been hypothesized that the diabetes epidemic could be related to the structural change of gut microbiota.

Studies have found that in T1D there is an imbalance in intestinal microbiota; thus, children with T1D showed higher levels of Bacteriodetes than controls, who instead had higher levels of Prevotellla [24]. Other studies have found a reduction in beneficial anaerobic bacteria in children with T1D and an increase in Enterobacteriaceae, and proposed this as a possible immune trigger for T1D onset [25]. A Finnish study that evaluated children at high genetic risk for T1D, following them from birth to 2.2 years of age, showed that the species Bacteroides dorei and Bacteroides vulgatus were found in greater numbers in T1D cases compared to controls prior to seroconversion, suggesting that early changes in microbiota composition could be useful in predicting T1D autoimmunity in genetically susceptible infants [26].

Diabetes-related alterations in gut microbiota composition have also been associated with exposure to xenobiotics, such as heavy metals, persistent organic pollutants (POPs), and organophosphate. In the last decades, there has been a massive production and release of toxic chemicals affecting the entire globe. Many of these chemicals interfere with the endocrine system altering hormone production, release, transport, and activities and are known as endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) [27]. EDCs enter the human body mainly through the mouth, and gut microbiota plays a central role in their metabolism, thus contributing to obesity and diabetes [28]. Among heavy metals, arsenic exposure in mice seems to affect gut microbiota composition, not altering Bacteriodetes but decreasing several species of Firmicutes (Eubacterium, Faecalibacterium, and Roseburia), leading to metabolomic changes in gluconeogenesis, adipogenesis, lipogenesis, and inflammation [29]. Regarding POPs, exposure to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzofuran (TCDF) affected gut microbial structure, with a decrease in the Firmicutes/Bacteriodetes ratio. TCDF also increased levels of Flavobacteriia and Butyrivibrio spp. and decreased Clostridia and Oscillobacter spp. resulting in an increase in bile acid metabolites. Increased levels of SCFAs were also observed in fecal and cecal contents of TCDF-exposed mice and may be responsible for altered hepatic lipogenesis, gluconeogenesis, and glycogenolysis [30]. Organophosphates (OPs) are chemical substances used in insecticides, herbicides, etc., which inhibit acetylcholine esterase; animal studies have shown that prolonged intake of the OP insecticide monocrotophos induces hyperglycemia, dyslipidemia, cardiac oxidative stress, and myocardial infarction in rats [31] An altered hepatic gluconeogenesis mediated by OP-degrading gut microbiota has been demonstrated to be the key mechanism underlying OP-induced hyperglycemia. [32]

Hence, structural alterations of gut microbiota seem to characterize all forms of diabetes. In fact, these compositional alterations may play a role in both inducing the onset of autoimmune diabetes in young predisposed subjects and in speeding up the process of β-cell failure in obese/insulin-resistant subjects.

3. Gut Microbiota in Immunopathogenesis of Diabetes

The microbes making up the gut microbiome utilize nutrients and produce metabolites which are able to influence metabolism, leading to obesity, insulin resistance, and diabetes. For example, short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) are produced by fermentation of dietary fibers; these molecules act both as energy substrates used by colonocytes and the host, and as ligands for G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) [33]. These GPCRs, under SCFA stimulation, induce peptide YY (PYY) production, which can modulate intestinal motility and nutrient absorption. A study of murine germ-free and cocolonized Gpr41-/- and +/+ littermates showed that Gpr41-deficiency is associated with reduced expression of PYY, increased intestinal transit rate, and reduced harvest of energy from the diet. These results reveal that Gpr41 is a regulator of host energy balance through effects that are dependent upon the gut microbiota [34].

The obese microbiome has an increased capacity to harvest energy from the diet, and this feature is genetically transmissible: some researchers have shown that colonization of germ-free mice with an obese microbiota led to a greater increase in total body fat than colonization with lean microbiota [21]. Furthermore, germ-free (GF) animals are protected against obesity after consuming a Western-style, high-fat, sugar-rich diet. Two complementary but independent mechanisms that result in increased fatty acid metabolism are involved here: elevated levels of fasting-induced adipose factor (Fiaf), a circulating lipoprotein lipase inhibitor which induces peroxisomal proliferator-activated receptor coactivator (Pgc-1α), and increased phosphorylated AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) activity [35]. These findings suggest that manipulation of the gut microbiota may impact on muscle activity, regulating fatty acid oxidation. Thus, the host energy metabolism may be protected against a high-calorie westernized diet. Furthermore, exercise intervention has been shown to directly affect gut microbiota composition; germ-free mice exhibited worse exercise performance compared to mice colonized by a single bacterial species, while mice colonized by multiple nonharmful bacteria displayed the best exercise performance [36]. Moreover, another study showed that in obese mice, even under high-fat diet conditions, exercise protects gut microbiota by reducing inflammatory markers such as cyclooxygenase 2 (Cox-2) in both the proximal and distal gut [37]. Human studies have also revealed the importance of physical exercise in modulating gut microbiota in order to prevent/ameliorate metabolic diseases. Estaki et al., after normalizing BMI, diet, and age, analyzed fecal microbiota and fecal SCFAs in 39 healthy subjects and found that a higher fitness level correlated with gut microbiome diversity. Furthermore, increased production of butyrate, a marker of gut health, and increased abundance of butyrate-producing species were found in individuals with greater levels of aerobic fitness [38]. Another study showed that in T2D patients, a six-month endurance, resistance, and flexibility training program decreased intestinal mycetes overgrowth, gut permeability, and systemic inflammation, resulting in improved glycemia and functional and anthropometric variables [39].

Obesity and insulin resistance, leading to T2D, are characterized by low-grade inflammation, consequent to a morbid activation of the immune system. Lipopolysaccharides (LPS), which are components of the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria, with their high inflammatogenic properties, were thought to be the precipitators of the inflammatory processes leading to obesity and insulin resistance [40]. LPS are able to cross the intestinal epithelial barrier either via leaky intestinal tight junctions or carried by chylomicrons [41]. Once they reach systemic circulation, LPS bind the plasma LPS-binding protein (LBP), which activates the receptor protein CD14 located in the plasma membrane of macrophages. This complex is able to bind Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) on the membrane of macrophages, triggering the synthesis of several inflammatory effectors, such as nuclear factor κB (NF-κB) and activator protein 1 (AP-1) [42]. This has been confirmed in mice with deletions of the LPS receptor TLR4, or part of the TLR4 machinery such as CD14, that showed attenuated inflammatory response and increased glucose transport; in addition, TLR4 inactivation blunted insulin resistance induced by LPS in differentiated adipocytes [43]. The involvement of gut microbiota has been further demonstrated since, in a study by Cani et al., chronic antibiotic treatment reduced metabolic endotoxemia and the cecal content of LPS in both high-fat-fed and ob/ob mice. This effect was correlated with reduced glucose tolerance and body weight gain. Furthermore, a high-fat diet was shown to greatly increase intestinal permeability and reduce the expression of genes coding for proteins of the tight junctions [44].

Thus, gut microbiota can affect intestinal mucosal permeability, leading to an increased absorption of exogenous antigens [45]. Furthermore, some microbial toxins have been reported to directly impair pancreatic β-cell function [46], which could be one of the mechanisms underlying autoimmune diabetes. In fact, in mice models, the injection of Streptomyces toxin and bafilomycin A1 resulted in smaller islets and reduced the entire pancreatic β-cell mass, concurrently impairing glucose tolerance [46]. Moreover, Lee et al. have also demonstrated that gut barrier disruption induced by C. rodentium infection accelerated insulitis in NOD mice [47]. Therefore, innate immune cells are directly involved in linking gut microbiota and diabetes pathogenesis. Any alteration in the communication between innate immunity components and gut microbiota may lead to diabetes onset, as explained above.

Several studies have investigated the role of the innate immune system at the intestinal level and also in T1D pathogenesis. Deletion of the innate immune adaptor myeloid differentiation primary response gene 88 (MyD88) in a NOD mouse model of T1D provided microbiota-dependent protection from the disease: MyD88-negative mice in germ-free (GF) but not in specific pathogen-free conditions develop the disease. The same authors also found that colonization of GF mice with a variety of intestinal bacteria reduced the occurrence of T1D in MyD88-negative but not wild-type NOD mice, favoring the balanced signal hypothesis: i.e., that both inflammatory and regulatory responses are induced by the microbiota and that TLR4-mediated Trif signaling causes a tolerizing immune response, which protects against T1D development [48].

Going back to talk about T2D, another mechanism involved in dysbiosis-induced immunopathogenesis of obesity and T2D is that of alterations in T helper 17/regulatory T cell (Th17/Treg) balance. Th17 and Treg cells are two CD4⁺ T helper cells; Treg cells regulate and control immune tolerance in healthy individuals, while Th17 cells mainly produce IL-17. Th17 cells have been implicated in the control of adipogenesis and glucose homeostasis in obesity [49]. In a recent study, intestinal RORγt⁺ IL-17⁺CD4⁺ T-cells were shown to participate in energy metabolism in mice, and specifically, a reduction of RORγt⁺ and IL-17-producing CD4⁺ T-cells contributed to the development of insulin resistance [50]. This observation supports the role of the intestinal Th17 lineage in the regulation of insulin sensitivity.

Several studies have shown that gut microbiota alterations are associated with abnormalities of the mucosal immune system, likely involved in the autoimmunity underlying T1D. In a murine study, the transfer of intestinal Lactobacillus johnsonii N 6.2 from diabetes-resistant biobreeding rats to diabetes-prone biobreeding (BBDP) rats resulted in a delay in disease pathogenesis through a mechanism that might involve the upregulation of Th17 cells [51]. These findings concur with those of another study, in which protection from the disease, probably mediated by the upregulation of intestinal T helper 17 cells, was observed after segmented filamentous bacteria were naturally transmitted to NOD mice [52]. These data seem to prove that bacteria provide protection against disease in both BBDP and NOD murine models.

Th17 cells are involved in different ways in T1D pathogenesis. In a spontaneous autoimmune diabetes model, IL-17A and IL-17F expressions in islets are related to insulitis in NOD mice. However, islet antigen-specific Th17 cells need to be transformed into Th1-like cells to induce diabetes [53]. Furthermore, a recent study has revealed that the exposure of nonobese diabetic NOD mice to acidified water was able to delay T1D onset: NOD mice exposed to neutral water, in fact, were more predisposed to the development of diabetes, while exhibiting a decrease in Firmicutes and an increase in Bacteroidetes, Actinobacteria, and Proteobacteria. They also had lower levels of Foxp3 expression in CD4(+)Foxp3(+) cells, as well as decreased CD4(+)IL-17(+) cells, and a lower ratio of IL-17/IFN-γ CD4⁺ T-cells, indicating that a change in liquid acidity dramatically alters the intestinal microbiome, the presence of protective Th17 and Treg cells, and the incidence of diabetes [54]. Moreover, in NOD mice, a Th17/Treg imbalance compromises the ability of Treg cells to suppress self-reactive effector T-cells and to impede the destruction of pancreatic islets, which may potentially induce or aggravate T1D [55].

The balance of Th1/Th2 lymphoid cells also seems to play a role in diabetes onset mediated by gut microbiota. Th1/Th2 lymphoid cells are CD4⁺ T-cells, whose differentiation into Th1 or Th2 depends on stimulation by IFN-γ and IL-4, respectively. Several studies have shown that gut microbiota and its metabolites can modulate the equilibrium of Th1/Th2 cells in the intestinal tract. For example, the polysaccharide A produced by an anaerobic gram-negative bacterium Bacteroides fragilis could promote the expression of proinflammatory cytokines, such as IL-12 and p40, leading to Th1 activation [56]. Furthermore, Pam3 of gram-positive bacteria can activate IFN-γ production, in turn inducing the differentiation of Th1 cells [57]. Commensal A4 bacteria belonging to the Lachnospiraceae family produce an immunodominant microbiota CBir1 antigen by inducing TGF-β production by dendritic cells [58].

IL-12 is also the primary immunoregulatory factor secreted by Th1 cells and plays a key role in the pathogenesis of diabetes. IL-12 is able to bind to IL-12 receptors on pancreatic β-cells and activate proinflammatory cytokines (IL-1β, TNF-α, and IFN-γ), inducing their apoptosis via the STAT4 signaling pathway [59]. In addition, IL-12 is involved in complications of T2D; Ali et al. recently determined that the disruption of IL-12 promotes angiogenesis and increases blood flow in obese type 2 diabetic mice by an endothelial nitric oxide synthase/Akt/vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2/oxidative stress-inflammation-dependent mechanism [60].

The nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-containing protein 2 (Nod2) has been identified as a key factor for T1D susceptibility; Nod2^-/-NOD mice had different gut microbiota compared to Nod2^+/+NOD mice and were protected from diabetes, but only when kept separate from Nod2^+/+NOD mice, suggesting that T1D susceptibility in Nod2^-/-NOD mice is dependent on the alteration of gut microbiota. In fact, colonizing germ-free NOD mice with Nod2^-/-NOD microbiota significantly reduced the number of cells secreting proinflammatory cytokines but increased T-regulatory cells [61].

A recent study also evaluated the ability of human gut microbiota to delay the onset of T1D when transferred into germ-free NOD mice; diabetes onset was significantly delayed in all bacteriome humanized colonies vs. germ-free NOD mice, but the pace of beta cell loss was not transferable to the mouse model [62].

Physical exercise also seems to play a role in the immunomodulation of gut microbiota involved in T1D pathogenesis. A recent study revealed that NOD mice subjected to moderate intensity exercise benefited from glucose-lowering effects in the late stages of diabetes, while control sedentary NOD mice showed larger infiltrates at the end of the 12-week study. These findings suggest that exercise could promote a beneficial immune-modulation in T1D [63].

Thus, gut microbiota can modulate both innate and adaptive immunity, resulting in conditions which facilitate diabetes onset. This is possible due to gut microbiota’s ability to affect glucose metabolism under predisposing conditions such as obesity and metabolic syndrome, and in conditions at risk of autoimmunity.

4. Gut Microbiota as a Novel Therapeutic Target for Prevention and Treatment of Diabetes

4.1. Probiotics

The aforementioned evidence has raised interest in targeting gut microbiota as an effective strategy to prevent and manage diabetes.

Probiotics are living microorganisms that can be ingested either alone or with food, conferring benefits to their host [64]. Yadav et al. showed that a probiotic dahi-supplemented diet, containing Lactobacillus acidophilus and Lactobacillus casei, significantly delayed the onset of glucose intolerance, hyperglycemia, hyperinsulinemia, dyslipidemia, and oxidative stress in high fructose-fed diabetic rats, thus lowering the risk of diabetes and its complications [65]. Other authors have investigated the effects of probiotic yogurt containing Lactobacillus acidophilus La5 and Bifidobacterium lactis Bb12 and conventional yogurt on blood glucose and antioxidant status in type 2 diabetic patients; the probiotic yogurt improved fasting plasma glucose values and HbA1c and antioxidant status in diabetic subjects [66]. Moreover, daily consumption of 200 ml of a shake containing CFU/100 ml of Lactobacillus acidophilus, CFU/100 ml of Bifidobacterium bifidum, and 1 g/100 ml of fructooligosaccharides decreased blood glucose in T2D individuals. Recently, a growing interest for Akkermansia muciniphila developed since it seems to ameliorate gut permeability, obesity, and glucose tolerance [67, 68]. A recent randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study first evaluated metabolic effects of Akkermansia muciniphila administration in overweight/obese insulin-resistant humans. It showed a positive effect on insulin sensitivity and total cholesterol, and it turned out to be safe and well tolerated [69].

Several studies have also investigated fecal transplants as a therapeutic strategy. An animal study showed that the bacterial transfer from MyD88-deficient NOD mice, which are protected from T1D development, reduced insulitis and significantly delayed the onset of diabetes. Moreover, after the oral transfer of fecal bacteria over 3 weeks, the composition of the gut microbiota was stably altered, as it showed an increase in Lachnospiraceae and Clostridiaceae and a decrease in Lactobacillaceae [70]. Furthermore, the TEDDY study, a prospective cohort study that followed children at high risk for autoimmune diabetes, observed a reduction in the risk of islet autoimmunity in children who had received probiotics before or at the age of 27 days compared with those who had first received probiotics after 27 days or not at all [71].

A number of studies in humans have explored the effects of infusing intestinal microbiota from lean donors to male recipients with metabolic syndrome. Vrieze et al. demonstrated that six weeks after infusion of microbiota from lean donors, insulin sensitivity of recipients and levels of butyrate-producing intestinal microbiota increased [72], and they concluded that butyrate-producing bacteria prevent translocation of endotoxic compounds derived from gut microbiota, one of the factors driving insulin resistance. Similarly, another study has suggested that the butyrate synthesizing microbiota could improve insulin sensitivity through signaling pathways and direct effects on glucose metabolism [73]. Thus, intestinal microbiota transplantation, especially F. prausnitzii, from a normal individual to a diabetic one, seems to be able to synthesize abundant quantities of butyrate, which stabilizes the leaky gut and inhibits downstream proinflammatory mechanisms.

Probiotic supplementation or microbiota transplantation are two promising novel therapeutic strategies that could be used to prevent or treat diabetes by modulating the host’s preexisting microbiota.

4.2. Prebiotics

Prebiotics are defined as food able to induce a selective growth and/or activity of one or a limited number of microbial genus(era)/species in the gut microbiota that confer(s) health benefits to the host [74]. Prebiotics are mainly inulin, fructooligosaccharides, galactooligosaccharides, and lactulose [75]. Kim et al. conducted a trial to evaluate the effect on glucose, lipid metabolism, and fecal microbiota composition of a one-month strict vegetarian diet in six obese subjects with T2D and/or hypertension. A strict vegetarian diet reduced body weight and the concentration of triglycerides, total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and HbA1c and improved fasting glucose and postprandial glucose levels. In addition, it determined compositional changes in gut microbiota, such as a reduced ratio of Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes and an increase in the species of Bacteroides fragilis and Clostridium, which decreased intestinal inflammation and SCFA levels [76]. Another randomized, placebo-controlled trial assessed the effects of the administration of high performance inulin on glycemic status and lipid profile in women with T2D. Forty-nine subjects were randomized to receive 10 g/d inulin or 10 g/d maltodextrin for 8 weeks. The inulin-treated group showed a significant reduction in fasting plasma glucose, HbA1c, total cholesterol, and triglycerides and an increase in HDL-C [77]. Furthermore, a cross-sectional study by Beretta et al. revealed that a higher fiber intake in T1D is also associated with lower systolic and diastolic blood pressure [78].

Several antidiabetic drugs act as prebiotics, inducing changes in gut microbiota composition. Metformin, which represents the first-line therapy in T2D management, is able to positively modulate gut microbiota composition, both in humans and animals [79], contrasting the effects of a high-fat diet [80]. The exact mechanism by which metformin acts on gut microbiota composition is still unknown, but it seems to decrease the abundance of Intestinibacter [81] while increasing butyrate production [82]. Some studies have shown that it is able to inhibit bacterial complex I and also has an antimalarial function [83]. The degree to which gut microbiota is altered by metformin depends on host factors, such as the dosage used, the oral availability of the drug, and personal variability in absorption.

Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists (GLP-1RAs), another class of widely used antidiabetic drugs, also seem to have a role in modulating gut microbiota. Wang et al. showed that in mice treated with liraglutide, compared to saxagliptin, a lean-related gut microbiota profile was consistent with the loss of body weight [84]. Other studies have shown that liraglutide prevents diabetes onset in male rats and that this effect seems to be correlated with structural changes in gut microbiota, specifically an increase in SCFA-producing bacteria (Bacteroides, Lachnospiraceae, and Bifidobacterium) [85].

5. Conclusions

It is well known that innumerable pathogenic mechanisms are involved in all forms of diabetes.

Considering the data presented above, it appears evident that structural and functional alterations of intestinal microbiota are present not only in overt diabetes but also in conditions which predispose towards diabetes, such as obesity, metabolic syndrome, and the presence of antibodies associated with immune-mediated diabetes. Moreover, many studies (summarized in Table 1) have shown that these alterations trigger an innate and adaptive immune response which finally leads to overt diabetes. Although not conclusive, the evidence points towards the microbiota inflammation/autoimmunity diabetes hypothesis. It is likely that microbiota alterations facilitate the appearance of diabetes in already predisposed subjects, as explained in Figure 1.

If this is confirmed, attempts to stem the progression of diabetes could begin with preventive nutritional strategies, not only to decrease calorie intake but also to modulate gut microbiota with prebiotic and probiotic supplements or even through fecal transplants.

Treatment for patients who already have diabetes would also change, in that they would receive supplements to modulate the gut microbiota and improve glucose metabolism. In this regard, it would seem that some drugs already used for the treatment of diabetes, such as metformin and GLP-1RAs, are effective in lowering glycemia thanks to their action on intestinal microbiota.

To conclude, we can say that in a not too distant future, prevention and treatment for both T1D and T2D should encompass the modulation of gut microbiota and its immune responses.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Acknowledgments

We thank Serena Rotunno for providing editorial assistance in the preparation of this manuscript. This study was supported by grants from the Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (Fondi Ateneo Linea D.3.2 and Fondi Ateneo Linea D.1, anno 2019) and the Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research (PRIN 2015373Z39_006) and awards from the European Foundation for the Study of Diabetes, Novo Nordisk, Eli Lilly and Company, and AstraZeneca (to T.M.). C.M.A. is the recipient of a fellowship prize from Diabete Ricerca and from Fondazione AMD (Borse di Studio in Memoria di Adolfo Arcangeli).

References

American Diabetes Association, “2. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes: standards of medical care in diabetes—2019,” Diabetes Care, vol. 42, Supplement 1, pp. S13–S28, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Kolb and T. Mandrup-Poulsen, “An immune origin of type 2 diabetes?” Diabetologia, vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 1038–1050, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. M. Libman and D. J. Becker, “Coexistence of type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus: “double” diabetes?” Pediatric Diabetes, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 110–113, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Zhao, T. D. Lieberman, M. Poyet et al., “Adaptive evolution within gut microbiomes of healthy people,” Cell Host & Microbe, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 656–667.e8, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. N. Frank, A. L. St. Amand, R. A. Feldman, E. C. Boedeker, N. Harpaz, and N. R. Pace, “Molecular-phylogenetic characterization of microbial community imbalances in human inflammatory bowel diseases,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 104, no. 34, pp. 13780–13785, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Berni Canani, J. A. Gilbert, and C. R. Nagler, “The role of the commensal microbiota in the regulation of tolerance to dietary allergens,” Current Opinion in Allergy and Clinical Immunology, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 243–249, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. G. Sandler and D. C. Douek, “Microbial translocation in HIV infection: causes, consequences and treatment opportunities,” Nature Reviews. Microbiology, vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 655–666, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Sender, S. Fuchs, and R. Milo, “Revised estimates for the number of human and bacteria cells in the body,” PLOS Biology, vol. 14, no. 8, p. e1002533, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. V. Hooper and A. J. Macpherson, “Immune adaptations that maintain homeostasis with the intestinal microbiota,” Nature Reviews. Immunology, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 159–169, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. B. Sartor, “Microbial influences in inflammatory bowel diseases,” Gastroenterology, vol. 134, no. 2, pp. 577–594, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. M. Uronis, M. Mühlbauer, H. H. Herfarth, T. C. Rubinas, G. S. Jones, and C. Jobin, “Modulation of the intestinal microbiota alters colitis-associated colorectal cancer susceptibility,” PLoS One, vol. 4, no. 6, p. e6026, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. V. Marietta, A. M. Gomez, C. Yeoman et al., “Low incidence of spontaneous type 1 diabetes in non-obese diabetic mice raised on gluten-free diets is associated with changes in the intestinal microbiome,” PLoS One, vol. 8, no. 11, p. e78687, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Burcelin, M. Serino, C. Chabo, V. Blasco-Baque, and J. Amar, “Gut microbiota and diabetes: from pathogenesis to therapeutic perspective,” Acta Diabetologica, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 257–273, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. E. Ley, P. J. Turnbaugh, S. Klein, and J. I. Gordon, “Microbial ecology: human gut microbes associated with obesity,” Nature, vol. 444, no. 7122, pp. 1022-1023, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Larsen, F. K. Vogensen, F. W. J. van den Berg et al., “Gut microbiota in human adults with type 2 diabetes differs from non-diabetic adults,” PLoS One, vol. 5, no. 2, p. e9085, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. S. Hotamisligil, “Inflammation and metabolic disorders,” Nature, vol. 444, no. 7121, pp. 860–867, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. R. Cardwell, L. C. Stene, G. Joner et al., “Caesarean section is associated with an increased risk of childhood-onset type 1 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis of observational studies,” Diabetologia, vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 726–735, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Holmberg, J. Wahlberg, O. Vaarala, J. Ludvigsson, and for the ABIS study group, “Short duration of breast-feeding as a risk-factor for beta-cell autoantibodies in 5-year-old children from the general population,” The British Journal of Nutrition, vol. 97, no. 1, pp. 111–116, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Brugman, F. A. Klatter, J. T. Visser et al., “Antibiotic treatment partially protects against type 1 diabetes in the bio-breeding diabetes-prone rat. Is the gut flora involved in the development of type 1 diabetes?” Diabetologia, vol. 49, no. 9, pp. 2105–2108, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Tremaroli and F. Backhed, “Functional interactions between the gut microbiota and host metabolism,” Nature, vol. 489, no. 7415, pp. 242–249, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. J. Turnbaugh, R. E. Ley, M. A. Mahowald, V. Magrini, E. R. Mardis, and J. I. Gordon, “An obesity-associated gut microbiome with increased capacity for energy harvest,” Nature, vol. 444, no. 7122, pp. 1027–1031, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. F. Murphy, P. D. Cotter, S. Healy et al., “Composition and energy harvesting capacity of the gut microbiota: relationship to diet, obesity and time in mouse models,” Gut, vol. 59, no. 12, pp. 1635–1642, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. J. Turnbaugh, V. K. Ridaura, J. J. Faith, F. E. Rey, R. Knight, and J. I. Gordon, “The effect of diet on the human gut microbiome: a metagenomic analysis in humanized gnotobiotic mice,” Science Translational Medicine, vol. 1, no. 6, p. 6ra14, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. E. Mejía-León, J. F. Petrosino, N. J. Ajami, M. G. Domínguez-Bello, and A. M. C. De La Barca, “Fecal microbiota imbalance in Mexican children with type 1 diabetes,” Scientific Reports, vol. 4, 2014.
View at: Google Scholar
E. Soyucen, A. Gulcan, A. C. Aktuglu-Zeybek, H. Onal, E. Kiykim, and A. Aydin, “Differences in the gut microbiota of healthy children and those with type 1 diabetes,” Pediatrics International, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 336–343, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. G. Davis-Richardson, A. N. Ardissone, R. Dias et al., “Bacteroides dorei dominates gut microbiome prior to autoimmunity in Finnish children at high risk for type 1 diabetes,” Frontiers in Microbiology, vol. 5, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. A. Neel and R. M. Sargis, “The paradox of progress: environmental disruption of metabolism and the diabetes epidemic,” Diabetes, vol. 60, no. 7, pp. 1838–1848, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. M. Snedeker and A. G. Hay, “Do interactions between gut ecology and environmental chemicals contribute to obesity and diabetes?” Environmental Health Perspectives, vol. 120, no. 3, pp. 332–339, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Lu, R. P. Abo, K. A. Schlieper et al., “Arsenic exposure perturbs the gut microbiome and its metabolic profile in mice: an integrated metagenomics and metabolomics analysis,” Environmental Health Perspectives, vol. 122, no. 3, pp. 284–291, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Zhang, R. G. Nichols, J. Correll et al., “Persistent organic pollutants modify gut microbiota-host metabolic homeostasis in mice through aryl hydrocarbon receptor activation,” Environmental Health Perspectives, vol. 123, no. 7, pp. 679–688, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Velmurugan, D. D. Venkatesh Babu, and S. Ramasamy, “Prolonged monocrotophos intake induces cardiac oxidative stress and myocardial damage in rats,” Toxicology, vol. 307, pp. 103–108, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Velmurugan, T. Ramprasath, K. Swaminathan et al., “Gut microbial degradation of organophosphate insecticides-induces glucose intolerance via gluconeogenesis,” Genome Biology, vol. 18, no. 1, p. 8, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Melhem, B. Kaya, C. K. Ayata, P. Hruz, and J. H. Niess, “Metabolite-sensing G protein-coupled receptors connect the diet-microbiota-metabolites axis to inflammatory bowel disease,” Cells, vol. 8, no. 5, p. 450, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. S. Samuel, A. Shaito, T. Motoike et al., “Effects of the gut microbiota on host adiposity are modulated by the short-chain fatty-acid binding G protein-coupled receptor, Gpr41,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 105, no. 43, pp. 16767–16772, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Backhed, J. K. Manchester, C. F. Semenkovich, and J. I. Gordon, “Mechanisms underlying the resistance to diet-induced obesity in germ-free mice,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 104, no. 3, pp. 979–984, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. J. Hsu, C. C. Chiu, Y. P. Li et al., “Effect of intestinal microbiota on exercise performance in mice,” Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 552–558, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. C. Campbell, P. J. Wisniewski, M. Noji et al., “The effect of diet and exercise on intestinal integrity and microbial diversity in mice,” PLoS One, vol. 11, no. 3, p. e0150502, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Estaki, J. Pither, P. Baumeister et al., “Cardiorespiratory fitness as a predictor of intestinal microbial diversity and distinct metagenomic functions,” Microbiome, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 42, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Pasini, G. Corsetti, D. Assanelli et al., “Effects of chronic exercise on gut microbiota and intestinal barrier in human with type 2 diabetes,” Minerva Medica, vol. 110, no. 1, pp. 3–11, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. D. Cani, J. Amar, M. A. Iglesias et al., “Metabolic endotoxemia initiates obesity and insulin resistance,” Diabetes, vol. 56, no. 7, pp. 1761–1772, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. C. E. Vreugdenhil, C. H. Rousseau, T. Hartung, J. W. M. Greve, C. van ‘t Veer, and W. A. Buurman, “Lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-binding protein mediates LPS detoxification by chylomicrons,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 170, no. 3, pp. 1399–1405, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. D. Neal, C. Leaphart, R. Levy et al., “Enterocyte TLR4 mediates phagocytosis and translocation of bacteria across the intestinal barrier,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 176, no. 5, pp. 3070–3079, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Poggi, D. Bastelica, P. Gual et al., “C3H/HeJ mice carrying a toll-like receptor 4 mutation are protected against the development of insulin resistance in white adipose tissue in response to a high-fat diet,” Diabetologia, vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 1267–1276, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. D. Cani, R. Bibiloni, C. Knauf et al., “Changes in gut microbiota control metabolic endotoxemia-induced inflammation in high-fat diet-induced obesity and diabetes in mice,” Diabetes, vol. 57, no. 6, pp. 1470–1481, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Vehik and D. Dabelea, “The changing epidemiology of type 1 diabetes: why is it going through the roof?” Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 3–13, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. A. Myers, K. D. Hettiarachchi, J. P. Ludeman, A. J. Wilson, C. R. Wilson, and P. Z. Zimmet, “Dietary microbial toxins and type 1 diabetes,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1005, pp. 418–422, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. S. Lee, D. L. Gibson, Y. Zhang, H. P. Sham, B. A. Vallance, and J. P. Dutz, “Gut barrier disruption by an enteric bacterial pathogen accelerates insulitis in NOD mice,” Diabetologia, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 741–748, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. P. Burrows, P. Volchkov, K. S. Kobayashi, and A. V. Chervonsky, “Microbiota regulates type 1 diabetes through Toll-like receptors,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 112, no. 32, pp. 9973–9977, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. A. Zúñiga, W.-J. Shen, B. Joyce-Shaikh et al., “IL-17 regulates adipogenesis, glucose homeostasis, and obesity,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 185, no. 11, pp. 6947–6959, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Pomié, L. Garidou, and R. Burcelin, “Intestinal RORrt-generated Th17 cells control type 2 diabetes: a first antidiabetic target identified from the host to microbiota crosstalk,” Inflammation and Cell Signaling, vol. 3, 2016.
View at: Google Scholar
K. Lau, P. Benitez, A. Ardissone et al., “Inhibition of type 1 diabetes correlated to a Lactobacillus johnsonii N6.2-mediated Th17 bias,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 186, no. 6, pp. 3538–3546, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. A. Kriegel, E. Sefik, J. A. Hill, H. J. Wu, C. Benoist, and D. Mathis, “Naturally transmitted segmented filamentous bacteria segregate with diabetes protection in nonobese diabetic mice,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 108, no. 28, pp. 11548–11553, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Martin-Orozco, Y. Chung, S. H. Chang, Y. H. Wang, and C. Dong, “Th17 cells promote pancreatic inflammation but only induce diabetes efficiently in lymphopenic hosts after conversion into Th1 cells,” European Journal of Immunology, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 216–224, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. J. Wolf, J. G. Daft, S. M. Tanner, R. Hartmann, E. Khafipour, and R. G. Lorenz, “Consumption of acidic water alters the gut microbiome and decreases the risk of diabetes in NOD mice,” The Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 237–250, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Marek-Trzonkowska, M. Mysliwiec, A. Dobyszuk et al., “Administration of CD4+CD25highCD127- regulatory T cells preserves beta-cell function in type 1 diabetes in children,” Diabetes Care, vol. 35, no. 9, pp. 1817–1820, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q. Wang, R. M. McLoughlin, B. A. Cobb et al., “A bacterial carbohydrate links innate and adaptive responses through Toll-like receptor 2,” The Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 203, no. 13, pp. 2853–2863, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Imanishi, H. Hara, S. Suzuki, N. Suzuki, S. Akira, and T. Saito, “Cutting edge: TLR2 directly triggers Th1 effector functions,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 178, no. 11, pp. 6715–6719, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Wu, H. P. Liu, F. Chen et al., “Commensal A4 bacteria inhibit intestinal Th2-cell responses through induction of dendritic cell TGF-beta production,” European Journal of Immunology, vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 1162–1167, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. R. Weaver, J. L. Nadler, and D. A. Taylor-Fishwick, “Interleukin-12 (IL-12)/STAT4 axis is an important element for β-Cell dysfunction induced by inflammatory cytokines,” PLoS One, vol. 10, no. 11, p. e0142735, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Ali, V. Mali, S. Haddox et al., “Essential role of IL-12 in angiogenesis in type 2 diabetes,” The American Journal of Pathology, vol. 187, no. 11, pp. 2590–2601, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Y. Li, J. A. Pearson, C. Chao et al., “Nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-containing protein 2 (Nod2) modulates T1DM susceptibility by gut microbiota,” Journal of Autoimmunity, vol. 82, pp. 85–95, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Neuman, O. Cinek, D. P. Funda et al., “Human gut microbiota transferred to germ-free NOD mice modulate the progression towards type 1 diabetes regardless of the pace of beta cell function loss in the donor,” Diabetologia, vol. 62, no. 7, pp. 1291–1296, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Codella, G. Lanzoni, A. Zoso et al., “Moderate intensity training impact on the inflammatory status and glycemic profiles in NOD mice,” Journal of Diabetes Research, vol. 2015, 11 pages, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
WHO - World Health Organization, “Evaluation of health and nutritional properties of probiotics in food including powder milk with live lactic acid bacteria,” Joint WHO/FAO Expert Consultation on Geneva, World Health Organization - WHO, 2001.
View at: Google Scholar
H. Yadav, S. Jain, and P. R. Sinha, “Antidiabetic effect of probiotic dahi containing Lactobacillus acidophilus and Lactobacillus casei in high fructose fed rats,” Nutrition, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 62–68, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. S. Ejtahed, J. Mohtadi-Nia, A. Homayouni-Rad, M. Niafar, M. Asghari-Jafarabadi, and V. Mofid, “Probiotic yogurt improves antioxidant status in type 2 diabetic patients,” Nutrition, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 539–543, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Everard, C. Belzer, L. Geurts et al., “Cross-talk between Akkermansia muciniphila and intestinal epithelium controls diet-induced obesity,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 110, no. 22, pp. 9066–9071, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Plovier, A. Everard, C. Druart et al., “A purified membrane protein from Akkermansia muciniphila or the pasteurized bacterium improves metabolism in obese and diabetic mice,” Nature Medicine, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 107–113, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Depommier, A. Everard, C. Druart et al., “Supplementation with Akkermansia muciniphila in overweight and obese human volunteers: a proof-of-concept exploratory study,” Nature Medicine, vol. 25, no. 7, pp. 1096–1103, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Peng, S. Narasimhan, J. R. Marchesi, A. Benson, F. S. Wong, and L. Wen, “Long term effect of gut microbiota transfer on diabetes development,” Journal of Autoimmunity, vol. 53, pp. 85–94, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
U. Uusitalo, X. Liu, J. Yang et al., “Association of early exposure of probiotics and islet autoimmunity in the TEDDY study,” JAMA Pediatrics, vol. 170, no. 1, pp. 20–28, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Vrieze, E. van Nood, F. Holleman et al., “Transfer of intestinal microbiota from lean donors increases insulin sensitivity in individuals with metabolic syndrome,” Gastroenterology, vol. 143, no. 4, pp. 913–916.e7, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Gao, J. Yin, J. Zhang et al., “Butyrate improves insulin sensitivity and increases energy expenditure in mice,” Diabetes, vol. 58, no. 7, pp. 1509–1517, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Roberfroid, G. R. Gibson, L. Hoyles et al., “Prebiotic effects: metabolic and health benefits,” British Journal of Nutrition, vol. 104, no. S2, pp. S1–S63, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Pineiro, N. G. Asp, G. Reid et al., “FAO technical meeting on prebiotics,” Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology, vol. 42, pp. S156–S159, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. S. Kim, S. S. Hwang, E. J. Park, and J. W. Bae, “Strict vegetarian diet improves the risk factors associated with metabolic diseases by modulating gut microbiota and reducing intestinal inflammation,” Environmental Microbiology Reports, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 765–775, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Dehghan, B. P. Gargari, and M. Asgharijafarabadi, “Effects of high performance inulin supplementation on glycemic status and lipid profile in women with type 2 diabetes: a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial,” Health Promotion Perspective, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 55–63, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
M. V. Beretta, F. R. Bernaud, C. Nascimento, T. Steemburgo, and T. C. Rodrigues, “Higher fiber intake is associated with lower blood pressure levels in patients with type 1 diabetes,” Archives of Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 47–54, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. J. McCreight, C. J. Bailey, and E. R. Pearson, “Metformin and the gastrointestinal tract,” Diabetologia, vol. 59, no. 3, article 3844, pp. 426–435, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. R. Shin, J. C. Lee, H. Y. Lee et al., “An increase in the Akkermansia spp. population induced by metformin treatment improves glucose homeostasis in diet-induced obese mice,” Gut, vol. 63, no. 5, pp. 727–735, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Forslund, F. Hildebrand, T. Nielsen et al., “Disentangling type 2 diabetes and metformin treatment signatures in the human gut microbiota,” Nature, vol. 528, no. 7581, pp. 262–266, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Wu, E. Esteve, V. Tremaroli et al., “Metformin alters the gut microbiome of individuals with treatment-naive type 2 diabetes, contributing to the therapeutic effects of the drug,” Nature Medicine, vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 850–858, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. R. Bridges, A. J. Jones, M. N. Pollak, and J. Hirst, “Effects of metformin and other biguanides on oxidative phosphorylation in mitochondria,” The Biochemical Journal, vol. 462, no. 3, pp. 475–487, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Wang, P. Li, Z. Tang, X. Yan, and B. Feng, “Structural modulation of the gut microbiota and the relationship with body weight: compared evaluation of liraglutide and saxagliptin treatment,” Scientific Reports, vol. 6, no. 1, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q. Zhang, X. Xiao, J. Zheng et al., “Featured article: structure moderation of gut microbiota in liraglutide-treated diabetic male rats,” Experimental Biology and Medicine, vol. 243, no. 1, pp. 34–44, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2019 Simona Moffa et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

2996

Downloads

1844

Citations