Agricultural Expansion-Induced Infiltration Rate Change in a West African Tropical Catchment

Land use and land cover in the Dano catchment is characterized by a rapid conversion from seminatural vegetation (fallow) to agriculture (cropland). -e study compares both the saturated (Ks) and the unsaturated (Kh) hydraulic conductivities under cropland and fallow in the catchment to gain insights into the effect of the current land use on soil water dynamics. Hydraulic conductivity was measured under forty-two (42) pairs of adjacent cropland-fallow plots using a Hood infiltrometer. Ks, Kh, bulk density, and soil texture were further compared using a paired two-tailed Student’s t-test (p � 0.05). -e results showed that both Ks and Kh are highly variable irrespective of the land use type (coefficient of variation> 100%).-e results also showed that Ks was significantly higher (1.16-fold on average) under fallow compared to cropland. As for Kh, the results showed that, from −2 cm to zero tension heads (h),Kh under cropland and fallow is not significantly different; however, as the supplied tension decreases up to the saturation state, Kh under fallow becomes statistically higher compared to cropland. No significant difference was found between soil textures and bulk density under cropland and fallow meaning that the observed differences of Ks and Kh under cropland and fallow were caused by land use and not preexisting difference in texture. -ese results suggest an increasing risk of erosion, soil fertility reduction, and flood in the catchment because of agricultural land expansion.


Introduction
Hydraulic conductivity (K) is a key hydraulic property determining water flow in the soil.It is an essential input for hydrological process analysis and simulation, as well as for crop models.K is potentially influenced by several factors including the topography, soil type and parent material, vegetation, land use, and seasonal change [1][2][3][4][5][6].e combination of these factors makes K a highly variable soil physical property, and measured values may considerably vary for a particular soil [7].A comprehensive understanding of K variability and the contribution of influencing factors thus remain a challenge.However, this understanding is a prerequisite to comprehend any hydrological system behavior, improve infiltration process representation in different applications, and to develop management strategies within agricultural and hydrological systems.
Many studies have increased the understanding of K variation due to (i) soil texture (e.g., [6,[8][9][10][11]), (ii) land use and land cover change [1,3,12], (iii) soil type [13,14], (iv) agricultural practices [15,16], etc.However, insights gained from the effect of agricultural practices (tillage, crop pattern, and fallow duration) on K variation have proved to be context specific.is is consistent with a literature review by Strudley et al. [17] which concluded that the results of the reviewed studies are so contradictory that hardly a general rule can be drawn when comparing the effects of agricultural practices on soil hydraulic properties.Indeed, agricultural management induced-infiltration change may be overshadowed by its high natural spatial and temporal variability of K [15,17].erefore, many authors (e.g., [17]) suggest that research to determine the impact of agricultural management options on the hydraulic conductivity should consequently be designed in a manner to consider the effect of dominant factors affecting soil hydraulic properties such us the soil type, soil local heterogeneity, and topography.
To exclusively quantify the differences in the soil hydraulic conductivity caused by forest conversion to spontaneous grass, Pirastru et al. [4] followed an approach based on the comparison of adjacent forest-grass fields.In this way, they minimized the potentially confounding factors in order to interpret differences in soil hydraulic conductivity as a function of land use alone.To rule out other influencing factors and assess the influence of land use change on soil hydraulic properties, Zimmermann et al. [18] compared native forest, pasture, and trees plantation located on homogenous soil units.Adjacent plots comparison approach was also followed by Pirastru et al. [19] to investigate on soil hydraulic properties and subsurface hydrological dynamics under maquis and grass, as did Agnese et al. [20] to compare native forest and pasture.Although findings achieved by these authors and many others (e.g., [21,22]) might differ, they underline the importance of considering homogenous soil units to overcome the influence of dominant factors (e.g., soil type and topography) affecting K while assessing the impact of land use and land cover change on soil infiltration.
Furthermore, various procedures-field and laboratory-are used to determine the hydraulic conductivity, and each involve a wide range of instruments and solutions.Many studies [23][24][25] highlighted the dependency of the K value on the determination method.e laboratory methods are conducted in a more controlled environment and are generally considered very reliable though sample taking, and transportation might introduce an error factor.Field methods of K measurements may also be subject to some bias.Fodor et al. [26] reported that field measurement of K may lead to air bubbles entrapped in the soil due to the advancing wetting front and results in a field hydraulic conductivity that may be underestimated.Alagna et al. [27] compared six infiltration techniques and concluded that they provided similar estimates of K even if the methods were not perfectly equivalent due to different soil disturbances.Overall, field measurement methods of K are considered to be more representative of soil water conditions [5,7,28].
erefore, the current study adopted a field measurement method.
e abovementioned studies consistently show that land use change potentially alters soil hydraulic conductivity.Furthermore, they underline that changes of soil hydraulic conductivity associated with the conversion from natural vegetation to agriculture depend on the local context (crop types, management practices, etc.).Very few field investigations concerning hydrological processes were made in the tropical African subhumid zones.A very limited number of studies have performed comparative investigations on K values between different land use types.Croplands have progressively replaced natural vegetation and fallow areas in the Dano catchment during the past decades [29].e influence of such a land use dynamics on soil hydraulic conductivity has not yet been investigated.It is hypothesized that cropping and fallowing/natural vegetation differently influence soil hydraulic conductivity and that a decrease of natural vegetation and fallow for the benefit of cropland might modify soil water dynamics and consequently change the hydrological behavior of the catchment.e objective of this study is to determine-at the plot level-the saturated and unsaturated hydraulic conductivities under cropland and fallow/natural vegetation and gain insights into regarding the land use and land cover change impact on soil water dynamics in the Dano catchment.

Study Area and Sampling Design.
e investigations were carried out in the Dano catchment (Figure 1).e Dano catchment is in the Southwest Region of Burkina Faso and covers an area of approximately 195 km 2 .e catchment is located in the Sudanese climate zone; thus, it is characterized by (i) the alternation of two seasons including a dry season of 6 to 7 months (November to April) and a rainy season of 5 months (May to October) and (ii) woody, arboraceous, or scrubby savannah vegetation type.Average annual temperatures in the catchment area are around 27 °C for average monthly temperatures between 24 °C and 32 °C with an average annual rainfall over the last 10 years of 958 mm [29].e main soil groups in the catchments include Gleysols, Cambisols, Lixisols, Stagnosols, Leptosols, and Plinthosols (the latter represents about 73.1% of the area) [31].
e infiltration tests were performed on adjacent plots: one in a cropland and its other counterpart in a fallow area following transect lines.e transect lines were defined in collaboration with the Soil Science and Soil Ecology working group of the university of Bonn. is group produced the local soil map of the Dano catchment.In their approach, they defined lines to ensure an even coverage of the study area.e infiltration plots were performed on those transect lines (Figure 1).To account for local soil heterogeneity, for a given pair of cropland-fallow adjacent plots, the distance between plots was kept as close as possible (0 to 3 m), and three infiltration tests were carried out per plot.e saturated hydraulic conductivity K s and the unsaturated hydraulic conductivity K h values for each plot are calculated as the geometric mean of three replicated infiltration tests.e procedure of adjacent plot selection was repeated forty-two times throughout the catchment, which yielded a set of 42 plots in croplands and related 42 (counterparts) in fallow areas.e infiltration test thus compares a paired sample of the two land use types.e test was carried out in the period of August to October 2012, corresponding to the crop development and midseason stages, i.e., 6 to 8 weeks after ploughing during the rainy season.

Measuring Methods.
A Hood infiltrometer [32,33] was used for the purposes of this study (Figure 2).e Hood in ltrometer is a tension in ltrometer for measuring both soil surface eld K s and K h .Among the advantages of the method are the in-situ measurement of soil hydraulic conductivity, the minimizing of soil disturbance, and the possibility to observe the air entry points during the measurement.In ltration with the Hood in ltrometer starts from a closed hood about three-quarters lled with water and standing on the ground.e control of the hydraulic pressure head in the water volume under the hood is made by adjusting the intake pipe immersion depth in the bubble tower.e di erence of height at the U-tube manometer and the water level in the standpipe indicates the applied pressure head under the hood.e applied hood had a radius of 16 cm.Under both fallow and cropland, the vegetation was shortened when necessary to allow a proper installation of the hood.Saturated ne sand was consistently used to seal the edge of the hood against the soil up to an outer ring.During measurement, the hydraulic head is progressively decreased starting from the value zero up to the air entry point.e in ltration rates were recorded for a pressure head of h ≈ 0, followed by constant stairs of 0.5 cm in the pressure head imposition (i.e., −0.5, −1.5, and −2 cm).At h < −3 cm, the number of measurements reduced, and measurements were measured only where possible.e leakage rate (ΔZ/unit time) was measured on the inltration reservoir.e ow rate was reported (for ΔZ on the in ltration reservoir 1 cm) when an apparent steady state was reached.
Several procedures are available for calculating the hydraulic conductivity from the measured raw data [26].However, hydraulic conductivity from the steady-state inltration in this study was estimated according to Wooding [35] as reported in the instructions manual coming along with the Hood in ltrometer [34].e theoretical principle underling the Hood in ltrometer is summarized in equations (1)(2)(3)(4)(5).
Hydraulic conductivity K h is a function of water pressure head h in the soils [36]: where K s (L•T −1 ) is the saturated hydraulic conductivity, h (L −1 ) is the water head, and α is an empirical tting parameter.
Under steady state and based on equation (1), Wooding [35] found the following approximate solution for the in ltration rate from a shallow circular pond of radius r: where Q(h) is the steady ow rate (L 3 •T −1 ) under a given supply potential h o (L).K s and α are the only unknowns from equation ( 2).ey can be either solved by making measurements at a xed water tension with multiple disc radii or inversely making measurements with a xed disk radius at multiple water tensions.e latter was applied in this study.
e application of equation ( 2), for neighboring values of water tensions (h 1 , h 2 ), gives (note that in this study the di erence of the pressure head between h 1 and h 2 0.5 cm) And by the means of division, α can be derived as follows: Finally, the hydraulic conductivity for h 1 is given by

Soil Physical and Chemical
Properties.Alongside the in ltration measurement test, undisturbed topsoil (1-10 cm) core samples and disturbed topsoil samples were collected for laboratory analyses.e undisturbed soil samples were taken using stainless steel sample rings following the drop hammer method on leveled soil horizons.e core cylinders were 250 cm 3 volume, i.e., 4 cm and 5 cm in radius and height, respectively.e samples were collected on 50% of the in ltration test plots, i.e., 21 disturbed samples and 21 undisturbed soil cores for each land use type.
e bulk density was determined by dividing the oven-dry mass of the core soil by its volume, and the coarse particles content was determined by passing the sample through a 2 mm diameter sieve.e texture analysis was carried out by a combination of wet sieving (sand fractions) and sedimentation (silt and clay fraction) [37], and soil organic carbon (SOC) content was determined by elemental analysis [38,39].

Statistical Analysis of the Collected Data.
Soil hydraulic conductivity is generally reported to be a log-normally distributed property [7,40] and thus needs to be transformed in order to be normally distributed.e Shapiro-Wilk test for normality was performed to determine whether the in ltration data were normally distributed, for the purpose of a transformation, in order to conduct variance analysis on conductivity data.A paired two-tailed Student's t-test was performed on the normal distributed data set to test the statistical di erence of K s and K h and texture between cropland and fallow.

Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity under Cropland and
Fallow.
e Shapiro-Wilk test indicated a nonnormal distribution of saturated hydraulic conductivity values, consistently with the result reported by several authors [41][42][43].erefore, the logarithm-base 10 of the data was calculated, and the resultant log K s showed a normal distribution (Table 1 and Figure 3).e log K s shows a relatively low CV, 13.65% and 24.17% for fallow and cropland, respectively, indicating uniformity in the distribution of log 10 K s .e mean value of K s for both cropland and fallow correspond to the high in ltration class [7].However, both land use types presented single K s values ranging from very low to very high class.
Besides the e ect of factors like topography, a wide range of sand content and soil type/group that a ects K s under both land use types, two elements can underline the high dispersion of K s under fallow: (i) the di erence in the age of the fallow areas under investigation (between 1 and 5 years) and (ii) the fallowing practice (technic).As highlighted by Miranda et al. [44], the both total porosity and macroporosity increase with the extension of the fallowing period, leading to an increase in hydraulic conductivity.Bush fallow or natural regrowth, as commonly done in the catchment, leads to the development of a diversity of plants species on the fallow areas.Di erent fallowing periods associated with herbaceous plants of di erent species may have led to the wide variation of K s within the fallow sample.
Similarly, the variation of K s under cropland can speci cally be attributed, on the one hand, to the di erence of crop species under cultivation in the in ltration plots.e investigated croplands were mainly composed of sorghum, cotton, maize, cowpea, and groundnut, each with a speci c cropping calendar.e di erence in the cropping calendar further implies di erent crop development stages.Alletto and Coquet [41] highlighted the root development stage as a K s temporal variation factor under cropland.On the other hand, variation of K s under cropland can be explained by the ploughing of croplands.All investigated elds were tilled.Tillage is known to have a transient e ect on K s .e saturated hydraulic conductivity generally increases immediately after tillage due to an increase in water-conducting mesopores and macropores but decreases afterward due to settlement and consolidation of the soil [16,43].Osunbitan et al. [45] noticed that, eight weeks after tillage, K s under cropland could decrease to a rate lower than K s under land use without tillage.e in ltration tests were performed over a relatively long period (about two months, Section 2.1), implying that di erent crop development stages were under investigation.Moreover, the crops elds were ploughed at di erent periods.Di erences of the crop type, development phase, and date of plough, as the above authors, may explain the observed high dispersion of K s under cropland.
Figure 4 suggests that saturated hydraulic conductivity is generally higher under fallow compared to cropland.e paired two-tailed Student's t-test shows that there is a difference between log K s under cropland and log K s under fallow (p value 0.007).ese results are in line with the conclusion of several studies [18,46] dealing with land use and land cover change impact on the saturated hydraulic conductivity that is a decreasing hydraulic conductivity with increasing land use intensity (i.e., a conversion from natural vegetation to crop).However, the distribution of the considered sample between di erent crops, especially crop association (Table 2), limits investigating the sole e ect of crop types on K s .Furthermore, as 90% of the sampled points were located on Plinthosols (the dominant soil group), one could not perform a consistent investigation on the e ect that soil type had on the di erence between K s under cropland and fallow.Nevertheless, the results overall evidence that K s is signi cantly higher under fallow compared to cropland, suggesting a di erence in the soil macroporosity under the two land use types.
Macropores have a larger in uence on the hydraulic conductivity at saturation than mesopores even though they generally occupy a much smaller fraction of total soil porosity [16,47,48].Iovino et al. [49] found contribution of micropores to unsaturated ow to be relatively more important in tilled soil than in natural ones.Conversely, close to saturation, ow in the natural, nontilled soils concentrates in a relatively small number of large macropores.Macropores under fallow and natural vegetation are primarily formed by (i) biological activity of earthworms, ants, and termites [3], and (ii) plant roots [48,50].Under ploughed cropland, macropores are formed by (i) the rearrangement of the solid phase by a tillage tool, (ii) plant roots, and (iii) to a lesser extent by earthworms [51][52][53][54].Benjamin [50] reported macroporosity to be reduced under cropland as compared to fallow and other natural vegetation types due to earthworm and termite populations abundance under the latter compared to cropland.Tillage is furthermore a punctual operation with a transient e ect on porosity increment; however, tillage-induced disturbance is reported to have a detrimental impact on preexisting macropores and earthworm and termite population abundance [51][52][53][54].Against this trend of increasing in ltration rate with  Applied and Environmental Soil Science increasing biological activity, Jouquet et al. [55] reported that termite sheetings breakdown generate structural crusts which reduce the in ltration rate under fallow.Mettrop et al. [56] also report a reduction of the in ltration rate due to termite activity in northern Burkina Faso.Field observations during the in ltration test attested a root density much higher under fallow compared to cropland.e decomposition of roots and subsequent formation of root channels may contribute to the higher macroporosity under fallow.No comparative investigation on the earthworm, termite, ant, etc. population density was carried out; however, the systematic annual ploughing of croplands suggests that the fauna activity might be lower under cropland compared to fallow areas.

Unsaturated Hydraulic Conductivity.
Unsaturated hydraulic conductivity was derived from the in ltration rate measurements.At supplied tension heads (h) below −2 cm, unsaturated hydraulic conductivity under cropland and fallow was found to be not statistically di erent (p value 0.05).As the supplied tension decreases up to the saturation state, the hydraulic conductivity under fallow becomes signi cantly higher compared to cropland (Table 3). is ascertains that di erences of hydraulic conductivity between fallow and cropland become greater towards saturation as reported by Kelishadi et al. [57] (Figure 5).e result supports the idea that the di erence in the hydraulic conductivity between fallow and cropland is indeed associated with the di erence of macroporosity as suggested in Section 3.1.Under high water tension (h), whilst water predominantly ows through the soil matrix no di erence between land use types is noted.is ascertains that matrix conductivity is quite similar under the di erent land use types.However, toward saturation, when water starts owing into soil macropores, signi cant di erences are observed between the land use types, implying a predominant function of soil macropores.

Soil Properties and the Hydraulic Conductivity.
e t-test shows no signi cant di erence between the textures of di erent land use types and denotes that the observed di erence of hydrological conductivity was caused by land use and not preexisting di erence in texture (Table 4).e comparison of bulk density and soil carbon content under the two land uses shows a similar trend.ese results suggest that the di erence of K s between cropland and fallow is unlikely to be attributable to the initial arrangement and size in soil pore.Several decades of cultivation the Dano catchment combined with the shortening of fallowing periods do not allow a consequent organic matter accumulation in the topsoil even under fallowing.e rapid rotation between cropland and fallow tends to even the soil texture and organic matter content in the catchment.

Conclusion
rough the comparison of saturated and unsaturated hydraulic conductivity, the study exhibited that, for the same land use type (cropland or fallow), the in ltration rate is a highly variable parameter in the Dano catchment.However,  6 Applied and Environmental Soil Science the adjacent plots comparison approach as performed in the study reveals signi cant di erences of K s and K h for water tension lower than −2 cm between cropland and fallow.is di erence was attributed to abundant macropores under fallow compared to cropland.Soil macroporosity appears to be reduced under cropland as suggested by the measurements of the unsaturated hydraulic conduction at a di erent water tension.erefore, ploughing and other farming activities are likely to negatively a ect soil pore size and arrangement.e results further indicate that a decrease in soil inltration following a conversion from fallow to cropland is not in uenced by texture and depend only on the soil structure that, to some extent, is dependent on land use.As shown in the study, both cropland and fallow areas had very comparable textural composition, bulk density, and organic matter content.Overall, land conversion from fallow to cropland in the Dano catchment shows-at the plot scale-a potential to increase in ltration excess overland ow and consequently exacerbate surface runo generation which could lead to more erosion, loss of soil fertility, or ood in the catchment.

Data Availability
e data set applied in the study is available on request to the corresponding author.

Figure 1 :
Figure 1: Location of sampling points within the Dano catchment.Each sampling point refers to two adjacent cropland and fallow plots.Land use map is after Forkour [30].

Figure 4 :
Figure 4: Boxplot comparison of saturated hydraulic conductivity (log K s ) on cropland and fallow.

Figure 5 :
Figure 5: Mean and 95% con dence interval of unsaturated hydraulic conductivity (K h ) estimated from eld measurement with increasing water tension under cropland and fallow.

Table 1 :
Descriptive statistics of log 10 K s for cropland and fallow (n 42).
CV: coe cient of variation; SWilk p value: Shapiro and Wilk skewness signi cance test p value; n: sample size.

Table 2 :
Descriptive statistics of the K s (cm/d) per crop type (n 42).
Cowpea and groundnut are additionally associated with sorghum and maize in intercropping.

Table 4 :
Soil texture, coarse particles, and bulk density under cropland and fallow at the investigated plots.

Table 3 :
Summary of statistics for the log 10 of unsaturated hydraulic conductivity with increasing water tension (n 42).