Uncertainty Analysis of Energy Production for a 3 × 50 MW AC Photovoltaic Project Based on Solar Resources

Access to solar energy is a prerequisite to remedy CO2 and improve the standard of human living. Green solar energy is only an immediate solution to add its zero emission profile and provide carbon footprint reduction benefits. This energy does not emit greenhouse gases which means it is a renewable free source of energy when producing electricity. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the accurate annul energy production data reducing uncertainty in solar energy estimates. This work investigated the solar energy assessment taking into account a detailed solar resource and energy production assessment for a 3× 50MW PV project with uncertainty analysis. The authors defined a total uncertainty of energy production which is estimated at 9.5% for one year and 8.9% for ten years as well as future variability of 3.4% for one year and 1.1% for ten years. The annual power degradation and expected energy production over the plant lifespan at dissimilar 99%, 90%, 75%, 60%, 50%, and 25% probability of surplus are also observed in this paper.


Introduction
Pakistan is confronting issues of acute shortage of electricity and energy supply demand.About 43% of the total population of Pakistan lives without access to electricity, and approximately 50,000 villages are completely detached from the national grid [1].The GoP has tasked the province's energy department for the provision of a requisite institutional framework to end the shortage of energy supply.The energy department's domain, inter alia, includes the generation of electricity by exploring especially indigenous resources, including solar, wind, biomass, and hydro.A master plan was developed by the GoP to issue many LOIs to solar energy developers for the development of large-scale solar power plants because PV technology is a promising application of renewable energy, widely used in urban and remote areas [2].Within the master plan, first step is an overview of solar information, investigating the resources, rights and general information.According to the PV installation environment, PV power-generating systems are divided into on-grid-connected and off-grid-connected PV systems.The original concept of the master plan is acquired to install an on-grid-connected project and grid-connected solar PV system which is the fastest-growing power-generating technology today [3,4].In this case, an installed capacity of 3 × 50 MW is selected, which would be able to produce electricity energy for about 150,000 homes during peak daytime hours [5].Through this project, the authors intend to create awareness amongst the general public for the use of renewable energy resources to reduce the burden on the national grid and to improve environmental conditions of the province.In the development of PV projects, the major area of risk is quantifying the expected annual energy production and uncertainty analysis whereas the most significant driver is the uncertainty in solar irradiance.Solar project developers require reasonable information in energy yield predictions in order to reduce the cost of financing systems, to understand the PV modeling uncertainty [6].The flow of energy yield in the PV modeling chain is also discussed further.For this purpose, a feasibility study of a project was performed with the aim of performing the following tasks: (i) Review different solar resources and evaluation of energy production of 3 × 50 MW with respect to uncertainty analysis (ii) Provision of the requirements of the photovoltaic systems to meet the identified design profiles and equipment selection The following uncertainly/elements and assemblies are subject to investigation as preparatory work.
1.1.Uncertainty in the PV Modeling Chain.Different performance models are applied in the industry to anticipate the measure of energy amount that the PV system can produce.These diverse models can differ significantly in their underlying mathematical formulations, in the numerical approach, and in the amount of data (assumptions) required for the simulation.The different steps in the PV modeling chain are subject to uncertainties as shown in Figure 1.The uncertainties affect different steps of the whole PV system parameters such as on meteorological, irradiation, PV module temperature, PV array, and inverter.The uncertainties on the environmental conditions are moderately larger while assessing the PV energy yield [7].
1.2.Technical/Financial Risk Factors.The technical risk factors in solar power generation depend on the perspective of the different stakeholders and their physical liability in the socioeconomic sector.When they start the development of renewable energy technology, they go over technical and financial risk assessments in terms of the technology they applied.Herein, we take into consideration technical risk factors for 3 × 50 MW which are an important uncertainty for identification from the perspective of solar developers [8].The uncertainly of solar resource has great impact on financial risk factors.To manage the financial risk assessment of an investment in a grid-connected PV system, the uncertainty quantification of solar energy yield calculation is identified, which is an important case based on the energy flow in the PV modeling chain.These uncertainties in solar resources are subjected to climate variability (σ Clim ), irradiation quantification (σ Irr ), conversion to the plane-of-array (σ POA−conv ), temperature modeling (σ Tmp ), PV array modeling (σ PVarr ), inverter modeling (σ Inv ), PV field-related uncertainties (σ Fld ), DC cabling (σ C−DC ), AC cabling (σ C−AC ), and availability (σ Av ) highlighted in the different steps of the main energy conversion in a PV system.Thus, given the parameters in Figure 2, if we maintain with correct quantification all uncertainties in the PV system modeling, then the financial risk assessment will allow the developers and investors to contain this factor [7].
1.3.PV Yield Assessment.We used the PVsyst package along with internal tools to calculate an energy yield assessment and expected production, which gives the right input data for the PV system [9].
1.4.Project Profile.Pakistan lies at a high potential solar radiation belt, and the land is available in large-scale magnitude for the development of solar power projects.The 3 × 50 MW site has an evacuation facility of 220 kV grid and is located 115 km northeast of Karachi, Pakistan, near the town of Thano Bula Khan and Nooriabad, Sindh.The 3 × 50 MW site is composed of three (3) identical projects which are located in combination in the same parcel of land side by side.Based on land coordinates, the site has a rich sun-radiation impact [5].The physical condition of the project land can be viewed in Figure 3.
The site coordinates with latitude and longitude are given below in Table 1.
1.5.Solar Resource Assessment.The solar energy resource assessment is the key role in the development of large scale-sized solar projects [10,11].The best way to determine the solar irradiation and temperature data at a particular site is by measuring different parameters of interest with the appropriate instruments at the location of the site.On-site measured irradiance data is not available at the project site.Therefore, several meteorological databases with different  2 International Journal of Photoenergy quality of data have been used to determine the long-term annual irradiation at the project site [12].The authors consulted several weather databases as well as data supplied by the client and have obtained irradiation and temperature data from the ones listed in Table 2.The absence of usable on-site irradiance and temperature measurements introduces additional uncertainty in the solar resource assessment.
1.5.1.NASA's Surface Meteorology and Solar Energy Server (NASA-SSE).NASA-SEE can provide the monthly average values from 22 years of collecting data.Irradiation data for global horizontal, diffuse horizontal, and direct normal are provided for the specific coordinates of the site [13].Table 3 presents the monthly values of global horizontal irradiation (GHI) and ambient temperature obtained from the site.
1.5.2.Meteonorm.Meteonorm is primarily a method for the calculation of solar radiation on arbitrarily orientated surfaces at any specific location [14].The Meteonorm database is mainly based on the GEBA ground stations and interpolates between the ground stations which we used to estimate the irradiation at the project site [12].The results of Meteonorm were extrapolated from the Karachi weather station located 105 km from the project site.The coordinates, elevation, and climatic distance are provided in Table 4 below.
Tables 5 and 6 present the average monthly values of the GHI and ambient temperature obtained from Metronome for the project location and the Karachi weather station as well as the period of record of each data, respectively.1.5.3.SolarGIS.We procured SolarGIS irradiance and temperature data from GeoModel which includes 15 years of meteorological history at the project site.Table 7 presents the average monthly values of the GHI and ambient temperature obtained from SolarGIS for the project location including the period of record [15].From this data set, the interannual variability of the project site was calculated to be 3.4%.
1.6.Solar Resource Assessment Results.In the absence of an on-site solar monitoring station, the irradiation data sources referred to present several drawbacks.When compared to a high-quality on-site monitoring station, the data sources are lacking accuracy in terms of spatial distance, spatial resolution, or temporal resolution.It should be noted that there are no measured solar radiation data within 25 km of the project site.The GoP and the relevant department are known in this concept and are relying on satellite data to manifest the solar resource assessment studies.We have analyzed each available GHI data source and utilized the data sources to estimate the global horizontal radiation and temperature for the project site.This is because the energy yield of the PV array Substation 3 International Journal of Photoenergy project site is directly related to the availability of GHI [16].A summary of the decision-making process is given briefly below.
(i) The measured data is not available near the project site, but data from surrounding databases have been considered (ii) NASA-SSE predicts irradiation data at the project site; however, the data are coarse in spatial resolution with relatively high uncertainty (10%) (iii) Meteonorm results are based on extrapolation of data from a weather station located 105 km from the project.The irradiation data have an uncertainty of 11% and with an interannual variability of 4.5% (iv) SolarGIS data are provided at the project site using satellite data interpolated by the GeoModel algorithm which typically has an uncertainty between 3.5% and 7.0%.The irradiation data for the project site has an estimated uncertainty of 6.0% with a calculated interannual variability of 3.4% [5] Based on the conclusions above, SolarGIS irradiation has been retained for the analysis based on its lower relative uncertainty, the long period of record, and the representativeness of the project site.The authors consider this source as the best available source of irradiation data for the site and suitable at this stage in the development of the project.Based on its experience, PV projects have progressed through project development using modeled solar resource data with a similar level of uncertainty as the SolarGIS data chosen for this project site.

Uncertainty Methodology
Solar resource assessment with uncertainly analysis is required to know the mechanism of uncertainty methodology.The methodology of the uncertainty of solar recourse is associated with a modeling chain in which the uncertainty term in this paper refers to the RMSE classified as the estimation of a quantity.The RMSE is framed by a systematic part such as MBE and another nonsystematic part "σ."The σ is the standard deviation of the error which represents random contributions to the error around the mean value [17].The term accuracy measures RMSE, MBE, and MAE are normalized over the average value of θi which are described as P RMSE , P BME , and P MAE , respectively; θi is the actual quantity, θi is the estimated quantity, and P variable is the number of samples which are defined below.
Then, Here, these values are normalized over the average value (N) is presented herein as normalized: Here, we define the combination of uncertainty.The overall role of propagation of uncertainties U x and U y for a given function f x, y can be computed in equation ( 6) when we assume the independent variables or neglecting correlations.The equation U c is an estimation of the standard deviation of the function f x, y , accepting that U x and U y are small compared to the partial derivatives.The combined standard uncertainty U c is computed using equation (7) based on uncertainty sources which shall be considered independent.In this way, combined expanded uncertainty U will be calculated by multiplying the combined standard uncertainty U c with a coverage factor presented in equation (8).We assume the 96% confidence interval of Gaussian distribution, and then this coverage factor Cov Factor is 1.97.Therefore, the final equation to find the expanded uncertainty U is obtained in equation ( 9) [18].
Then, according to equation (7) and Cov Factor , Here, Cov Factor = 1 97 (coverage factor).3, PV facility defined loss factors such as module quality of +0.3%, module degradation loss of −1.0%, soiling of −0.3%, mismatch of −0.1, cabling (ohmic wiring loss) of -0.1%, inverter efficiency of −2.1%, transformer of −1.1%, system availability of 0.0%, and grid availability and parasitic [18,19].Based on the PV correction, the array nominal energy is defined as 9723 MW/h at an STC efficiency of 15.47% as well as array virtual energy at MPPT which is calculated at 83704 MW/h.Before the final energy is injected into the grid, available energy at the inverter output side is assumed significant in whole losses in the PV system; therefore, the energy in the inverter output is calculated as 81938 MW/h.The final energy is injected into grid 80085 MW/h which predicts the estimated Figure 4 after all losses behavior done.The results of Figures 5-8 show the energy flow in the PV system defining the losses at each step and setting the benchmark of energy.Figures 9 and 10 show the energy injected into the grid monthly based on the daily input/output energy diagram.

Uncertainty Analysis.
The uncertainty of the final result is a consequence of the uncertainty of solar radiation in this case (global horizontal irradiation), the inaccuracies of the simulation procedure itself (a choice of model), and        (2) Total Uncertainty.The future variability of GHI should be added to the above uncertainties, in order to obtain the total uncertainty in the solar energy assessment.The one-year or ten-year periods are typically under consideration.It is assumed that all errors are independent and that the Gaussian distribution is applicable.Table 10 resumes the uncertainty figures considered for the project.
The total uncertainty of the energy production estimate could be reduced by considering an on-site solar monitoring station with irradiance data measured for a minimum period of one year.The confidence limits for probabilities of exceeding 99%, 90%, 75%, 60%, and 50% for the one year and ten years are provided in Table 11 for each layout in downside scenarios.Additionally, we have an "upside" probability exceeding 25% in Table 11.
The capacity factor of a PV plant is defined as the ratio of the actual energy produced over a period of time, to the hypothetical maximum possible, which refers to running full time at a rated power [19][20][21].

Power Degradation and Production.
The degradation factors based on the PV module manufacturer's warranty are typically pessimistic, and a more realistic approach on the temperature of the photovoltaic module has an adverse effect on the performance of photovoltaic modules [22].If degradation is less, then good performance depends on the environmental conditions and seasons of the year.Previous research depicts that modules of different technologies have shown par.It has to be based on both the track record and existing information regarding each technology of the PV module's manufacture.For that purpose, the polycrystalline silicon technology track record is taken into consideration.Ideally, module degradation would be further investigated during the technical due diligence process for the project, and the analysis of the specific datasheet would be reviewed by the module manufacturer.The authors have considered the PV module technology track record.Based on this review, the authors applied a linear factor of 0.75% to account for annual degradation due to long-term mechanisms.The degradation factor at the end of a single year is applied at the beginning of the same year, based on a pragmatic approach [5].As a result, the PR for each single year is demonstrated in Table 12.The resulting production figures for a one-year period, with corresponding performance ratios, are also presented in Table 12.In order to reduce the minimum degradation factor in PV panels, a regular cleaning mechanism is required to enhance the good production [23].The PV module degradation losses can reach 5% with a lifespan of 20~25-year warranty period [19,24].

Figure 1 :
Figure 1: Different steps in the PV modeling chain.

Figure 2 :
Figure 2: Energy yield flow in PV modeling chain parameters are subjected to uncertainties.

Figure 3 :
Figure 3: Physical condition of site/land milestone.
wherein U c = combined uncertainty U = expanded uncertainty P = number of samples R Norm a = normally distributed random components R Uni b = uniformly distributed random components Syst Norm c = normally distributed systematic components Syst Uni d = uniformly distributed systematic components 3. Results and Discussion 3.1.PV Energy Production.The main simulation results of the energy production produce 80085 MWh/year, and the

Figure 7 :
Figure 7: First month of global inverter loss and available energy at inverter output.

3. 2 . 1 .
Uncertainty Analysis of the Irradiation Data.Variability of the global horizontal irradiation is not negligible; at this site, the interannual variability of 3.4% of the project area has been calculated based on 15 years of monthly GI data from SolarGIS.In addition to the yearly variability of GHI, we have estimated an uncertainty of 6.0%~6.1% to account for any error in the modeled GHI data.This uncertainty considers the modeling accuracy of GHI data for the project site considering the vendor validation results of the model within this region.

Figure 8 :Figure 9 :
Figure 8: First month AC ohmic loss and external transformer loss.

Figure 10 :
Figure 10: Energy injected into the grid monthly.

Table 2 :
List of meteorological databases consulted for the project.

Table 3 :
Monthly values from NASA-SSE.

Table 4 :
The coordinates of the Meteonorm stations and climatic distance to the site.

Table 5 :
Monthly values of GHI and temperature from Meteonorm from the project site.

Table 6 :
Monthly values of GHI and temperature from the Meteonorm from the nearest weather station.

Table 7 :
Monthly values of GHI and temperature from SolarGIS.

Table 8 :
Energy assessment results through simulation.
Figure 5: First month values of horizontal global irradiation and global incident in coll.plane.Figure 6: First month effective energy at the output of the array and array virtual energy at MPPT.

Table 9 :
The above sources assessed for the project and are presented in the table.

Table 10 :
The uncertainty figures considered for the project.Uncertainty of the Simulation.The main sources of uncertainties, excluding the variability of the global horizontal irradiation, are as shown in Table9.

Table 11 :
Confidence limits for the PV layout of PV plant 1-and 10-year periods, without power degradation.

Table 12 :
Performance ratio and net energy output (MWh/year) for one-year periods.