Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-04T06:56:53.562Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Crystallinity, Crystallite Size and Lattice Perfection in Fibrous Polymers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

D. J. Johnson
D. J. Johnson*
Affiliation:
Textile Physics Laboratory, Department of Textile Industries, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
Get access

Extract

The X-ray diffraction patterns from fibrous polymers are generally characterized by a small number of relatively broad overlapping peaks often overlaid with a diffuse halo. Single fibres give the same pattern as a parallel bundle of fibres, so that the pattern is equivalent to the rotation pattern of a single crystal. Despite the inherent difficulty of insufficient well-defined reflections, all commercially useful fibres have been indexed, starting with cellulose, through nylon 66 and polyester, to the more recent fibres, such as Nomex and Kevlar. Only the structural complexities of the natural fibres of keratin (wool and hair) remain to be fully determined.

Many sophisticated computations have been carried out to refine unit-cell constants; unfortunately, much of this work is of doubtful value to those interested in fibre characterisation. Fibres are semicrystalline materials and their molecules are insufficiently well ordered for precision calculations of atomic positions. Indeed, there can be significant error involved in evaluating unit-cell constants from overlapping peaks, unless precise profile resolution is carried out.

Type
Research Article
Information
Advances in X-Ray Analysis , Volume 24: Twenty-Ninth Annual Conference on Applications of X-ray Analysis, August 4-8, 1980 , 1980 , pp. 25 - 36
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Heyer, K.H. and Mark, H., Ber.Dtsch.Chem. Ges 61:1939(1928).Google Scholar
2. Bunn, G.W. and Garner, E.V., Proc.Roy.Soc.A, 189:39(1947).Google Scholar
3. Daubeny, R.de P., Eunn, C.W. and Brown, G.J., Proc.Roy.Soc.A, 266:531(1954).Google Scholar
4. Kakida, H., Chatini, Y. and Tadokoro, H., J.Polymer Sci., Polymer Phys.Ed., 14:427(1976).Google Scholar
5. flortholt, M.G., Eur.Polymer J., 10:799(1974).Google Scholar
6. Johnson, D.J., in: “Diffraction Methods fox Structural Determination of Fibrous Polymers”, ACS Symposium Series, to be published.Google Scholar
7. Keller, A.,. Rep.Prog.Phys., 31:623(1968).Google Scholar
8. Hindeleh, A.M. and Johnson, D.J., Polymer, 13:27(1972).Google Scholar
9. Hindeleh, A.M. and Johnson, D.J., Polymer, 13:423(1972).Google Scholar
10. Hindeleh, A.M. and Johnson, D.J., Polymer, 19:27(1978).Google Scholar
11. Vakelin, J.H., Virgin, H.S. and Crystal, E., J.Appl.Phys., 50:1654(1959).Google Scholar
12. Hindeleh, A.M. and Johnson, D.J., Polymer, 11:666(1970).Google Scholar
13. Hermans, P.H. and Weidinger, A., Text.Res.J., 31:558(1961).Google Scholar
14. Hindeleh, A.M. and Johnson, D.J., J.Phys.D., 4:259‘(1971).Google Scholar
15. Kuland, W., Acta Cryst., 14:1180(1961).Google Scholar
16. Sotton, M., Arniaud, A. and Habourdin, C., J.Appl.Polymer Sci., 22:2585(1978).Google Scholar
17. Sotton, M., in: “Diffraction Methods for Structural Determina ion of Fibrous Polymers”, ACS Symposium Series, to be published.Google Scholar
18. Hindeleh, A.M. and Johnson, D.J., Polymer, to be published.Google Scholar
19. Buchanan, D.E. and Miller, R.L., J.Appl.Phys., 37:4003(1966).Google Scholar
20. Sennett, S.C., Johnson, D.J. and Murray, R., Carbon, 14:117(1976).Google Scholar