Toward a Criminology of Sexual Harassment

Literature Cited

1. Adler C. 1984. The convicted rapist: a sexual or a violent offender?. Crim. Justice Behav. 11:157–77
   [Google Scholar]
2. Am. Psychol. Assoc. Zero Toler. Task Force. 2008. Are zero tolerance policies effective in the schools? An evidentiary review and recommendations. Am. Psychol 63:9852–62
   [Google Scholar]
3. Atwater LE, Tringale AM, Sturm RE, Taylor SN, Braddy PW 2019. Looking ahead: how what we know about sexual harassment now informs us of the future. Organ. Dyn. 48:4100677
   [Google Scholar]
4. Begany JJ, Milburn MA. 2002. Psychological predictors of sexual harassment: authoritarianism, hostile sexism, and rape myths. Psychol. Men Masculinity 3:2119–26
   [Google Scholar]
5. Berdahl JL, Moore C. 2006. Workplace harassment: double jeopardy for minority women. J. Appl. Psychol. 91:2426–36
   [Google Scholar]
6. Bernburg JG, Krohn MD, Rivera CJ 2006. Official labeling, criminal embeddedness, and subsequent delinquency: a longitudinal test of labeling theory. J. Res. Crime Delinquency 43:167–88
   [Google Scholar]
7. Berrey E, Nelson RD, Nielsen LB 2017. Rights on Trial: How Workplace Discrimination Law Perpetuates Inequality Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
   [Google Scholar]
8. Blackstone A, Houle J, Uggen C 2014. “I didn't recognize it as a bad experience until I was much older”: age, experience, and workers’ perceptions of sexual harassment. Sociol. Spectr. 34:314–37
   [Google Scholar]
9. Blackstone A, Uggen C, McLaughlin H 2009. Legal consciousness and responses to sexual harassment. Law Soc. Rev. 43:631–68
   [Google Scholar]
10. Bobbitt-Zeher D. 2011. Gender discrimination at work: connecting gender stereotypes, institutional policies, and gender composition of workplace. Gender Soc 25:6764–86
    [Google Scholar]
11. Brassel ST, Settles IH, Buchanan NT 2019. Lay (mis)perceptions of sexual harassment toward transgender, lesbian, and gay employees. Sex Roles 80:76–90
    [Google Scholar]
12. Brownmiller S. 1999. In Our Time: Memoir of a Revolution New York: Dell
    [Google Scholar]
13. Burke T. 2017. #MeToo was started for black and brown women and girls. They're still being ignored. Washington Post Novemb. 9. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-nation/wp/2017/11/09/the-waitress-who-works-in-the-diner-needs-to-know-that-the-issue-of-sexual-harassment-is-about-her-too/
    [Google Scholar]
14. Cantor D, Fisher BS, Chibnall S, Bruce C, Townsend R et al. 2015. Report on the AAU campus climate survey on sexual assault and sexual misconduct Rep., Westat Rockville, MD:
15. Clarke RV. 1983. Situational crime prevention: its theoretical basis and practical scope. Crime Justice 4:225–56
    [Google Scholar]
16. Clinard MB, Yeager PC. 1980. Corporate Crime New York: Free Press
17. Cohen LE, Felson M. 1979. Social change and crime rate trends: a routine activity approach. Am. Sociol. Rev. 44:4588–608
    [Google Scholar]
18. Collinson M, Collinson D. 1996. “It's only Dick”: the sexual harassment of women managers in insurance sales. Work Employ. Soc. 10:129–56
    [Google Scholar]
19. Connell RW. 1987. Gender and Power: Society, the Person, and Sexual Politics Stanford: Stanford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
20. Cortina LM, Berdahl JL. 2008. Sexual harassment in organizations: a decade of research in review. Handbook of Organizational Behavior L Cooper, J Barling 469–97 Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE
    [Google Scholar]
21. DeKeseredy WS. 1988. Woman Abuse in Dating Relationships: The Role of Male Peer Support Toronto: Can. Sch. Press
    [Google Scholar]
22. DeKeseredy WS, Schwartz MD. 1993. Male peer support and woman abuse: an expansion of Dekeseredy's model. Sociol. Spectr. 13:4393–413
    [Google Scholar]
23. DeKeseredy WS, Schwartz MD. 2013. Male Peer Support and Violence Against Women: The History and Verification of a Theory Boston: Northeastern Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
24. DeLisi M. 2001. Extreme career criminals. Am. J. Crim. Justice 25:2239–52
    [Google Scholar]
25. Dellinger K, Williams CL. 2002. The locker room and the dorm room: workplace norms and the boundaries of sexual harassment in magazine editing. Soc. Probl. 49:2242–57
    [Google Scholar]
26. Dobbin F, Kalev A. 2019. The promise and peril of sexual harassment programs. PNAS 116:2512255–60
    [Google Scholar]
27. Duwe G, Donnay W. 2008. The impact of Megan's Law on sex offender recidivism: the Minnesota experience. Criminology 46:2411–46
    [Google Scholar]
28. Duwe G, Donnay W, Tewksbury R 2008. Does residential proximity matter? A geographic analysis of sex offense recidivism. Crim. Justice Behav. 35:4484–504
    [Google Scholar]
29. Edelman LB. 2016. Working Law: Courts, Corporations, and Symbolic Civil Rights Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
    [Google Scholar]
30. Edelman LB, Uggen C, Erlanger HS 1999. The endogeneity of legal regulation: grievance procedures as rational myth. Am. J. Sociol. 105:2406–54
    [Google Scholar]
31. EEOC (Equal Employ. Opport. Comm.). 2016. Select task force on the study of harassment in the workplace: report of co-chairs Chai R. Feldblum & Victoria A. Lipnic Rep., EEOC Washington, DC: https://www.eeoc.gov/select-task-force-study-harassment-workplace
    [Google Scholar]
32. EEOC (Equal Employ. Opport. Comm.). 2020. Federal #MeToo: examining sexual harassment in government workplaces Rep., US Comm. Civ. Rights Washington, DC: https://www.usccr.gov/pubs/2020/04-01-Federal-Me-Too.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
33. Farley L. 1978. Sexual Shakedown: The Sexual Harassment of Women on the Job New York: McGraw-Hill
    [Google Scholar]
34. FBI (Fed. Bur. Investig.). 2014. Crime in the United States, 2013 Rep., Dep. Justice Washington, DC:
    [Google Scholar]
35. Felson RB. 2002. Violence and Gender Reexamined Washington, DC: Am. Psychol. Assoc.
36. Fitzgerald LF, Drasgow F, Hulin CL, Gefland MJ, Magley VJ 1997. Antecedents and consequences of sexual harassment in organizations: a test of an integrated model. J. Appl. Psychol. 82:578–89
    [Google Scholar]
37. Fitzgerald LF, Shullman SL, Bailey N, Richards M, Swecker J et al. 1988. The dimensions and extent of sexual harassment in higher education and the workplace. J. Vocat. Behav. 32:152–75
    [Google Scholar]
38. Folke O, Rickne J, Tanaka S, Tateishi Y 2020. Sexual harassment of women leaders. Daedalus 149:1180–97
    [Google Scholar]
39. Gelfand M, Fitzgerald LF, Drasgow F 1995. The latent structure of sexual harassment: a cross-cultural confirmatory analysis. J. Vocat. Behav. 47:2164–77
    [Google Scholar]
40. Giuffre PA, Williams CL. 1994. Boundary lines: labeling sexual harassment in restaurants. Gender Soc 8:3378–401
    [Google Scholar]
41. Gutek BA, Morasch B. 1982. Sex-ratios, sex-role spillover, and sexual harassment of women at work. J. Soc. Issues 38:455–74
    [Google Scholar]
42. Halper LR, Rios K. 2019. Feeling powerful but incompetent: fear of negative evaluation predicts men's sexual harassment of subordinates. Sex Roles 80:247–61
    [Google Scholar]
43. Harris RJ, McDonald DP, Sparks CS 2018. Sexual harassment in the military: individual experiences, demographics, and organizational contexts. Armed Forces Soc 44:125–43
    [Google Scholar]
44. Hart CG. 2019. The penalties for self-reporting sexual harassment. Gender Soc 33:4534–59
    [Google Scholar]
45. Hersch J. 2011. Compensating differentials for sexual harassment. Am. Econ. Rev. 101:3630–34
    [Google Scholar]
46. Hodson R, Roscigno VJ, Lopez SH 2006. Chaos and the abuse of power: workplace bullying in organizational and interactional context. Work Occup 33:4382–416
    [Google Scholar]
47. Hollis-Peel ME, Reynald DM, van Bavel M, Elffers H, Welsh BC 2011. Guardianship for crime prevention: a critical review of the literature. Crime Law Soc. Change 56:153–70
    [Google Scholar]
48. Houle J, Staff J, Uggen C, Mortimer JT, Blackstone A 2011. The impact of sexual harassment on depressive symptoms during the early occupational career. Soc. Ment. Health 1:89–105
    [Google Scholar]
49. Huebner BM, Kras KR, Pleggenkuhle B 2019. Structural discrimination and social stigma among individuals incarcerated for sexual offenses: reentry across the rural-urban continuum. Criminology 57:4715–38
    [Google Scholar]
50. Hulin CL, Fitzgerald LF, Drasgow F 1996. Organizational influences on sexual harassment. Sexual Harassment in the Workplace: Perspectives, Frontiers, Response Strategies MS Stockdale 127–50 Women Work Res. Policy Ser. 5 Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE
    [Google Scholar]
51. Jouriles EN, Krauss A, Vu NL, Banyard VL, McDonald R 2018. Bystander programs addressing sexual violence on college campuses: a systematic review and meta-analysis of program outcomes and delivery methods. J. Am. Coll. Health 66:6457–66
    [Google Scholar]
52. Kearney LK, Rochlen AB, King EB 2004. Male gender role conflict, sexual harassment tolerance, and the efficacy of a psychoeducative training program. Psychol. Men Masculinity 5:172–82
    [Google Scholar]
53. Khan S, Greene J, Mellins CA, Hirsch JS 2020. The social organization of sexual assault. Annu. Rev. Criminol. 3:139–63
    [Google Scholar]
54. Konik J, Cortina LM. 2008. Policing gender at work: intersections of harassment based on sex and sexuality. Soc. Justice Res. 21:3313–37
    [Google Scholar]
55. Kruttschnitt C, Uggen C, Shelton K 2000. Predictors of desistance among sex offenders: the interaction of formal and informal social controls. Justice Q 17:61–87
    [Google Scholar]
56. Labhardt D, Holdsworth E, Brown S, Howat D 2017. You see but you do not observe: a review of bystander intervention and sexual assault on university campuses. Aggress. Violent Behav. 35:13–25
    [Google Scholar]
57. Latané B, Darley JM. 1969. Bystander “apathy. .” Am. Sci. 57:2244–68
    [Google Scholar]
58. Lengnick‐Hall ML. 1995. Sexual harassment research: a methodological critique. Pers. Psychol. 48:4841–64
    [Google Scholar]
59. Levenson JS, D'Amora DA. 2007. Social policies designed to prevent sexual violence: the emperor's new clothes. Crim. Justice Policy Rev. 18:2168–99
    [Google Scholar]
60. Lim S, Cortina LM. 2005. Interpersonal mistreatment in the workplace: the interface and impact of general incivility and sexual harassment. J. Appl. Psychol. 90:3483–96
    [Google Scholar]
61. Link BG, Cullen FT, Struening E, Shrout PE, Dohrenwend BP 1989. A modified labeling theory approach to mental disorders: an empirical assessment. Am. Sociol. Rev. 54:3400–23
    [Google Scholar]
62. Lucero MA, Middleton KL, Finch WA, Valentine SR 2003. An empirical investigation of sexual harassers: toward a perpetrator typology. Hum. Relat. 56:121461–83
    [Google Scholar]
63. Lussier P. 2005. The criminal activity of sexual offenders in adulthood: revisiting the specialization debate. Sex Abuse 17:3269–92
    [Google Scholar]
64. Lussier P, LeBlanc M, Proulx J 2005. The generality of criminal behavior: a confirmatory factor analysis of the criminal activity of sex offenders in adulthood. J. Crim. Justice 33:2177–89
    [Google Scholar]
65. Lussier P, Mathesius J. 2018. Integrating general and specific theories of sex offending: a path-breaking perspective. Sexual Offending: A Criminological Perspective P Lussier, E Beauregard 12–43 New York: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
66. Lynch M. 2002. Pedophiles and cyber-predators as contaminating forces: the language of disgust, pollution, and boundary invasions in federal debates on sex offender legislation. Law Soc. Inq. 27:3529–57
    [Google Scholar]
67. MacKinnon CA. 1979. Sexual Harassment of Working Women: A Case of Sex Discrimination New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
68. Mancini C, Barnes JC, Mears DP 2013. It varies from state to state: an examination of sex crime laws nationally. Crim. Justice Policy Rev. 24:2166–98
    [Google Scholar]
69. Mansfield PK, Koch PB, Henderson J, Vicary JR, Cohn M, Young EW 1991. The job climate for women in traditionally male blue-collar occupations. Sex Roles 25:1–263–79
    [Google Scholar]
70. Marshall A-M. 2001. A spectrum in oppositional consciousness: sexual harassment plaintiffs and their lawyers.. Oppositional Consciousness: The Subjective Roots of Social Protest J Mansbridge, A Morris 99–145 Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
    [Google Scholar]
71. Matsueda RL. 1992. Reflected appraisals, parental labeling, and delinquency: specifying a symbolic interactionist theory. Am. J. Sociol. 97:61577–611
    [Google Scholar]
72. McCann C, Tomaskovic-Devey D, Lee Badgett MV 2018. Employers’ responses to sexual harassment Work. Pap., Univ. Mass. Cent. Employ. Equity Amherst: https://www.umass.edu/employmentequity/employers-responses-sexual-harassment
73. McLaughlin H, Uggen C, Blackstone A 2012. Sexual harassment, workplace authority, and the paradox of power. Am. Sociol. Rev. 77:4625–47
    [Google Scholar]
74. McLaughlin H, Uggen C, Blackstone A 2017. The economic and career effects of sexual harassment on working women. Gender Soc 31:333–58
    [Google Scholar]
75. Meritor v. Vinson 477 U.S. 57 1986.)
76. Miner-Rubino K, Cortina LM. 2004. Working in a context of hostility toward women: implications for employees’ well-being. J. Occup. Health Psychol. 9:2107–22
    [Google Scholar]
77. Natl. Acad. Sci. Eng. Med. 2018. Sexual Harassment of Women: Climate, Culture, and Consequences in Academic Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine Washington, DC: Natl. Acad. Press
    [Google Scholar]
78. Nelson CG, Halpert JA, Cellar DF 2007. Organizational responses for preventing and stopping sexual harassment: effective deterrents or continued endurance. Sex Roles 56:11811–22
    [Google Scholar]
79. O'Leary-Kelly AM, Bowes-Sperry L, Bates CA, Lean ER 2009. Sexual harassment at work: a decade (plus) of progress. J. Manag. 35:3503–36
    [Google Scholar]
80. Page T, Pina A. 2015. Moral disengagement as a self-regulatory process in sexual harassment perpetration at work: a preliminary conceptualization. Aggress. Violent Behav. 21:73–84
    [Google Scholar]
81. Pellegrini AD. 2002. Bullying, victimization, and sexual harassment during the transition to middle school. Educ. Psychol. 37:3151–63
    [Google Scholar]
82. Pickett JT, Mancini C, Mears DP 2013. Vulnerable victims, monstrous offenders, and unmanageable risk: explaining public opinion on the social control of sex crime. Criminology 51:3729–59
    [Google Scholar]
83. Pina A, Gannon TA, Saunders B 2009. An overview of the literature on sexual harassment: perpetrator, theory, and treatment issues. Aggress. Violent Behav. 14:2126–38
    [Google Scholar]
84. Pryor JB, Giedd JL, Williams KB 2017. A social psychological model for predicting sexual harassment. J. Soc. Issues 51:69–84
    [Google Scholar]
85. Pryor JB, LaVite CM, Stoller LM 1993. A social psychological analysis of sexual harassment: the person/situation interaction. J. Vocat. Behav. 42:168–83
    [Google Scholar]
86. Quinn BA. 2002. Sexual harassment and masculinity: the power and meaning of “girl watching. .” Gender Soc 16:3386–402
    [Google Scholar]
87. Rennison CM. 2002. Rape and sexual assault: reporting to police and medical attention, 1992–2000 Rep. NCJ 194530, Bur. Justice Stat. Washington, DC: https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/rsarp00.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
88. Reynald DM. 2009. Guardianship in action: developing a new tool for measurement. Crime Prev. Community Saf. 11:11–20
    [Google Scholar]
89. Reynald DM. 2010. Guardians on guardianship: factors affecting the willingness to supervise, the ability to detect potential offenders, and the willingness to intervene. J. Res. Crime Delinquency 47:3358–90
    [Google Scholar]
90. Rospenda KM, Richman JA, Nawyn SJ 1998. Doing power: the confluence of gender, race, and class in contrapower sexual harassment. Gender Soc 12:140–60
    [Google Scholar]
91. Ryder NB. 1965. The cohort as a concept in the study of social change. Am. Sociol. Rev. 30:843–61
    [Google Scholar]
92. Saguy AC. 2000. Employment discrimination or sexual violence? Defining sexual harassment in American and French law. Law Soc. Rev. 34:41091–128
    [Google Scholar]
93. Saguy AC. 2003. What Is Sexual Harassment? From Capitol Hill to the Sorbonne Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
94. Sampson RJ, Laub JH. 1992. Crime and deviance in the life course. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 18:63–84
    [Google Scholar]
95. Sandler JC, Freeman NJ, Socia KM 2008. Does a watched pot boil? A time-series analysis of New York State's sex offender registration and notification law. Psychol. Public Policy Law 14:4284–302
    [Google Scholar]
96. Schultz V. 1998. Reconceptualizing sexual harassment. Yale Law J 107:1683–805
    [Google Scholar]
97. Schultz V. 2003. The sanitized workplace. Yale Law J 112:82061–93
    [Google Scholar]
98. Schultz V. 2018. Open statement on sexual harassment from employment discrimination law scholars. Stanford Law Rev 71:17–48
    [Google Scholar]
99. Schwartz MD, DeKeseredy WS, Tait D, Alvi S 2001. Male peer support and a feminist routine activities theory: understanding sexual assault on the college campus. Justice Q 18:3623–49
    [Google Scholar]
100. Shannon S, Tinkler J. 2020. Sexual harassment and the rationales for punishment. ASA Footnotes 48:15–7
     [Google Scholar]
101. Simon LMJ. 1997. Do criminal offenders specialize in crime types. Appl. Prev. Psychol. 6:135–53
     [Google Scholar]
102. Simpson SS. 2019. Reimagining Sutherland 80 years after white-collar crime. Criminology 57:2189–207
     [Google Scholar]
103. Soothill K, Francis B, Sanderson B, Ackerley E 2000. Sex offenders: specialists, generalists—or both. Br. J. Criminol. 40:156–67
     [Google Scholar]
104. Starr B. 2019. Shanahan wants to criminalize sexual harassment in the military. CNN Politics May 1. https://www.cnn.com/2019/05/01/politics/shanahan-sexual-harassment-miltary/index.html
     [Google Scholar]
105. Stock SR, Tissot F. 2012. Are there health effects of harassment in the workplace? A gender-sensitive study of the relationships between work and neck pain. Ergonomics 55:147–59
     [Google Scholar]
106. Sutherland EH. 1940. White‐collar criminality. Am. Sociol. Rev. 15:801–3
     [Google Scholar]
107. Sutherland EH. 1949. White Collar Crime Hinsdale, IL: Dryden
108. Tappan P. 1947. Who is the criminal. Am. Sociol. Rev. 12:1096–102
     [Google Scholar]
109. Tenbrunsel AE, Rees MR, Diekmann KA 2019. Sexual harassment in academia: ethical climates and bounded ethicality. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 70:245–70
     [Google Scholar]
110. Tewksbury R, Mustaine EE, Covington M 2010. Offender presence, available victims, social disorganization and sex offense rates. Am. J. Crim. Justice 35:11–14
     [Google Scholar]
111. Tinkler JE. 2012. Resisting the enforcement of sexual harassment law. Law Soc. Inq. 37:11–24
     [Google Scholar]
112. Tinkler JE. 2013. How do sexual harassment policies shape gender beliefs? An exploration of the moderating effects of norm adherence and gender. Soc. Sci. Res. 42:51269–83
     [Google Scholar]
113. Tinkler JE, Li YE, Mollborn S 2007. Can legal interventions change beliefs? The effect of exposure to sexual harassment policy on men's gender beliefs. Soc. Psychol. Q. 70:4480–94
     [Google Scholar]
114. Uggen C, Blackstone A. 2004. Sexual harassment as a gendered expression of power. Am. Sociol. Rev. 69:164–92
     [Google Scholar]
115. Uggen C, Shinohara C. 2009. Sexual harassment comes of age: a comparative analysis of the United States and Japan. Sociol. Q. 50:201–34
     [Google Scholar]
116. Welsh S. 1999. Gender and sexual harassment. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 25:169–90
     [Google Scholar]
117. Williams v. Saxbe 413 F. Supp 654 1976.)
118. Williams CL. 1997. Sexual harassment in organizations: a critique of current research and policy. Sex. Cult. 1:19–43
     [Google Scholar]
119. Williams MJ, Gruenfeld DH, Guillory LE 2017. Sexual aggression when power is new: effects of acute high power on chronically low-power individuals. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 112:2201–23
     [Google Scholar]
120. Willis GM, Levenson JS, Ward T 2010. Desistance and attitudes towards sex offenders: facilitation or hindrance. J. Fam. Violence 25:6545–56
     [Google Scholar]